Military Review

In the Russian Federation prepared a final version of the weapons program to 2027 year

28
The Kremlin received the final version of the state armaments program (LG) for 2018 – 2027 years, reports Kommersant.




According to a newspaper source, the HPV-2027 will most likely be signed by the president this week. If that happens, 22 December will be officially announced. The government has made the last amendments to the program on December 14.

“The development of the HPV-2027 has been carried out over the past three years. Initially, the ten-year program was supposed to come into force in 2016, however, due to the unstable economic situation, Vladimir Putin postponed its adoption for two years. The economic situation has not become simpler, but the political situation dictates its own conditions, ”writes the publication with reference to the interlocutor.

It is reported that in the new GPV "the Defense Ministry will receive the most on rearmament - around 19 trillion rubles, the rest of the agencies (Ministry of Internal Affairs, FSB, SVR and Rosgvardiya) - over 3 trillion rubles."

According to the newspaper, among the priorities of the HPV-2027 will be the nuclear deterrence system, high-precision weapon, weapons on the "new physical principles" (hypersound) and the development of general-purpose forces.

The latter “were clearly underfunded in the previous period,” the source said. Ground forces should receive new military air defense systems (including those being developed as part of the Standard Development Design Bureau), Tanks T-90 and T-14 Armata, infantry armored vehicles Kurganets-25, and Boomerang armored personnel carriers. The emphasis will also be placed on “adapting weapons for the Arctic territories, in particular, we will talk about the S-300B4 anti-aircraft missile system and the Tor-M2 anti-aircraft missile system,” the source added.

In terms of nuclear deterrence systems, it is planned to purchase air-launched cruise missiles, submarine-launched ballistic missiles, and ground-based intercontinental carriers.

“So, in 2018–2027, the new strategic solid-fuel complexes RS-26 Rubezh and the heavy liquid RS-28 Sarmat (carrier of hypersonic blocks - product 4202) will be adopted. In part aviation purchases of Su-30SM and Su-35 multi-functional fighters, as well as Su-34 front-line bombers (all of these planes participated in the Syrian campaign) should continue, the first purchase of a batch of promising Su-57 front-line aviation complex, 24 MiG-35 fighters, as well as a batch of Tu-160M2 strategic missile carriers will be acquired, ”the material says.

It is also reported that the purchases of helicopters will be reduced, but mass production of the C-500 Prometheus and Buk-M3 complexes, unmanned aerial vehicles and the new Razdan space optical reconnaissance system will be deployed in the VKS.

In addition, more than ten development projects (R & D) are planned for the creation of promising ships. The construction of submarines, the modernization of ships, and the supply of modern aircraft to naval naval aviation and coastal missile complexes to the naval coastal forces will also continue. Planned further development of groups of ships - carriers of high-precision weapons.

The publication said that in the coming decade, emphasis will be placed on the construction of ships of the near-sea zone, equipped with high-precision weapons, including cruise missiles.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
28 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Teberii
    Teberii 18 December 2017 11: 24
    +3
    While everything looks smooth, time will tell.
    1. 79807420129
      79807420129 18 December 2017 11: 41
      +8
      In Russia, the final version of the arms program until 2027 has been prepared

      It happens smoothly on paper, but forget about the ravines repeat Much depends on funding.
      1. seti
        seti 18 December 2017 11: 57
        +5
        With financing everything will be fine. There is money that they would not say. We must not forget that military production is also an important component of the state economy as a whole. A large number of people and their families are associated with the military-industrial complex, and as long as there is production, these people will not remain without work.
        So we will succeed.
        1. Alex777
          Alex777 18 December 2017 13: 47
          +2
          Ah, well planned ... but not enough! hi
      2. bsk_una
        bsk_una 18 December 2017 17: 04
        +1
        From the development of the economy, which is still lacking in our country
  2. Magic archer
    Magic archer 18 December 2017 11: 26
    +5
    All deadlines for the new technology are apparently shifted. Su-57 has only just mastered the new engine and when it is completely ready, God knows. About PAK-YES nothing is said. There is a clear bias towards strengthening the air defense forces. Yet C-400 is just mastering and already C-500 is on the way. Unfortunately we are late in rearmament
    1. Vlad.by
      Vlad.by 18 December 2017 11: 52
      +4
      The phrase "when it is completely ready, God alone knows" as if copied from a previous training manual ...
      Already flew and thank God!
      1. Magic archer
        Magic archer 18 December 2017 11: 54
        +1
        What does it mean and thank God ?! If the task is to create a full-fledged 5 generation fighter then this formulation does not fit! If we do, then it is better or at least not worse than the Americans!
        1. Vlad.by
          Vlad.by 19 December 2017 11: 21
          +1
          Is he worse? With a thrust of 18 tons and ATS? Is the fuel consumption, allowing in range to give the same penguin twice when loading with weapons also doubled?
          What idolatry is this ?! American is good, ours, sorry, no. Not only that, at least not worse, it’s also much cheaper!
  3. Vadim851
    Vadim851 18 December 2017 11: 42
    0
    It is not said about the re-equipment of small arms, what’s the matter with it? Actual problem too. Replacing decently will cost ...
    1. cannabis
      cannabis 18 December 2017 12: 25
      +1
      Why change what is to what is not yet? That is enough. But in every infantry platoon with a heavy machine gun, it would be just right. But, if you really want to, you can replace the AK-74 with an RPK of 7,62 with night or sniper sights. Vota tuta us and "accuracy" and "accuracy" and "armor penetration" with reliability!
      1. My doctor
        My doctor 18 December 2017 13: 17
        +1
        Quote: cunning
        But in every infantry platoon with a heavy machine gun, it would be just right.

        And to it is a compartment for carrying a machine gun and ammunition.
        1. cannabis
          cannabis 18 December 2017 13: 21
          +1
          Two on a machine gun, two on a tray and equipment of tapes. But what a song!
      2. Vadim851
        Vadim851 18 December 2017 15: 11
        0
        I had in mind AK or AEK, which they are experiencing for a year, it is time to complete it, a lot of labor has been invested in them. The PKK will certainly be heavy.
        1. cannabis
          cannabis 18 December 2017 15: 46
          +1
          The weight is equal to the PCA, and the possibilities are better unspeakable. And all these new crafts from the series “Don’t sew a mare’s tail”. Until there is a new cartridge, there will be no new machine gun.
  4. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 18 December 2017 11: 44
    +1
    Well, as they say in a good way, with God!
  5. cannabis
    cannabis 18 December 2017 11: 54
    +2
    Well, they gave all their planes to adversaries! And I do not like the word "rearmament". I have already seen how "Perestroika" and "Reorganization of the Army" ended.
    1. Going
      Going 18 December 2017 12: 02
      +5
      Our plans are ready to reduce the madness of any adversary, because they will all be reviewed, but I am silent about the implementation, so let them use it. lol
    2. Sergey53
      Sergey53 18 December 2017 12: 58
      0
      Quote: cunning
      Well, they gave all their planes to adversaries! And I do not like the word "rearmament". I have already seen how "Perestroika" and "Reorganization of the Army" ended.

      I already read an article in Vesti where they wrote that we owe the victory to Syria to the dismissed Mr. Serdyukov and the dismissed Russian hero Makarov. Without their invaluable contribution, she would not have competed. Will there still be.
      1. cannabis
        cannabis 18 December 2017 13: 05
        0
        They say that any information should be divided by 49, I suppose yes! Even at 49 and a half!
  6. Mihanishche
    Mihanishche 18 December 2017 12: 12
    +1
    Well done our! A clear, thoughtful plan. Everything is in place, the little things are taken into account. Good luck, with God! Time will tell, while everything looks smooth.
    Have money.
  7. Bastion Eagle
    Bastion Eagle 18 December 2017 12: 13
    +1
    Everything looks the way it should look ... no “death star” is just the most necessary. Unfortunately, I did not see the mention of “zircon,” and this is a key component of Russia's long-term maritime security.
    1. askort154
      askort154 18 December 2017 13: 20
      +1
      Stronghold Eagle ...... Unfortunately I did not see the mention of "zircon", and this is a key component of Russia's long-term maritime security.

      Read carefully .. "(butHypersonic Block Holder - Product 4202) " yes
  8. steelmaker
    steelmaker 18 December 2017 12: 19
    +1
    Judging by international exhibitions, the demand for our weapons is huge! But their implementation lasts for years, because we do not have the capacity for quick production. Especially air defense and aircraft. The budget is very small. To build factories for the production of air defense and aircraft need more money. Judging by the budget, the plants are not going to build!
  9. NEXUS
    NEXUS 18 December 2017 12: 41
    +4
    The publication clarifies that in the coming decade, emphasis will be placed on the construction of ships in the near sea zone,

    That is, before the 27th year, new surface ships of the first rank do not have to wait ... hmm ...
    1. Rushnairfors
      Rushnairfors 18 December 2017 19: 02
      +3
      This moment also upset me, even more than the lack of mention of PAK YES, I wonder if at least 4 Gorshkovs will surrender by the 27th year?
  10. cedar
    cedar 18 December 2017 13: 14
    +2
    Guns, tanks, missiles - this is necessary and good. But .., if we live to the age of 27, what I wish for everyone, we will witness the appearance of a superweapon, which is now being developed under the heading "secretly" in the bowels of the military-industrial complex. No wonder two-thirds of the military budget of the Russian Federation is spent on R&D. The adversary will also not stand still .., which means the world of our children will become even more unstable, dangerous, with an endless series of conflicts on the verge of self-destruction of humanity ...
    Or maybe Russia will find a way to neutralize any self-destruction weapons ..?
  11. Steve57
    Steve57 19 December 2017 08: 13
    0
    Preservation? SAM S-350 "Hero" !!?