Military Review

Bazaar show. When current topics are sacrificed by TV ratings

46
On the “Military Review”, they repeatedly raised the topic of the blatant bazaar of modern talk shows - those programs on the air of the central TV channels, where it would seem that cultural and educated people scream with a good language when discussing almost any topic.


Analysts, all kinds of presidents and directors of various centers of politics, geopolitics, political politics, pseudo-politics and political science, members of the lower house of parliament, members of the upper house. In an attempt to inflict an informational or disinformational blow to opponents, they even get the impression that these people are not from the parliamentary chamber, but from the chamber, excuse me, number six.

Any topic - fists "bald", and often in the literal sense of the word. One expert takes off to put on the physiognomy of another expert. He in turn (and maybe “out of turn”) yells at the whole studio about where he saw this studio along with the host of the ether, rushes in the hearts that he falls under the arm — a glass of water crumpled with paper — and flies out. ” backstage. "
Gentlemen bass and baritones try to drown down the ladies. Ladies, bringing the voice to the utmost top notes, cut through the studio with response informational attacks. In the appendage of one another, and often among themselves - frank insults, rudeness, disregard for the interlocutor. The arguments in favor of their point of view again boil down to the “fool himself!” Option. Nobody is going to give in to anyone in terms of the market level.

Bazaar show. When current topics are sacrificed by TV ratings


Meanwhile, political talk shows are gaining ratings. The viewer spits on the screen, but he can’t do anything with himself, having become very real dependent on this option of discussing a particular topic by respected ladies and gentlemen on the other side of the blue screen.

And it is frankly a rare case when a person appears in the studio of a federal channel who may not draw decibels, but draw considerable attention to his point of view. And to attract so that the studio calms down and goes from the bazaar mode to the mode of a handsome meeting, understanding that it is necessary to listen to each other, at least for propriety ...

You can long resent the fact that political talk shows have long become an analogue of “House-2”. And by and large, nothing to be surprised. If in our country the ex-TV host of the show of orgies to the whole country suddenly finds itself in the list of presidential candidates with the fabulous slogan “Sobchak against all”, it means that the civilized discussion has precisely ordered to live long. Although ordered to live and the discussion as such. There is no discussion. There are shouts, there is hysterics, the desire to slap in the face is also present, but there is more and more often no substantive conversation with conclusions and suggestions.

One recent example is the “discussion” of the removal of the Russian national winter sports team from the Olympic Games in Pyeongchang. Under the white flag - please, under the flag of Russia - nizzzya.

Friends, can anyone give the name of at least one human rights activist who would find in himself even a drop of courage and prepare a report on the violation of the rights of Russian athletes by international bureaucrats from sports? At least one of these human rights advocates uttered a word against the introduction of the principle, in fact, collective responsibility. Against the principle introduced by organizations that position themselves as regulators of relations in the sports and legal environment. Where are all these human rights funds, artels, groups, concilia, teams, etc., which have written in black and white about the need to protect human rights regardless of their nationality, religion, age or attitude towards politics? Everyone is silent, like water in his mouth scored.

Has anyone seen at least one “human rights activist” on the air of the talk shows mentioned, which would also come to millions of audiences voicing the position that WADA and the IOC violate international law and reanimate, in fact, medieval, “Horde” principles - when severe punishment can be obtained for the offense of a person whom you have never met in your life?

These people sit quietly like mice. No incriminating reports and statements. Full disregard for the interests of citizens. They certainly will not appear on the talk show, although it would be very interesting to listen to them. Listening to the babble of “justification” about why they advocate the protection of human rights not as systematic and comprehensive work, but as selective attempts from the “denunciation of the bloody regime” series.

And who saw on the federal channels, in which the colossal information possibilities of talk shows, were broadcast on how officials from Russian sports and sportsmen themselves threw sports arbitration with lawsuits against WADA and the IOC? Statements that “Russia is in our heart,” which looks like complacency and self-indulgence, are heard, and there hasn’t been a legal blow to the high-handed puppets of one “exceptional” superpower. No information about this. And here it would have been possible to start a male conversation in the studio - with the arguments and tension of the vocal cords. But as soon as it comes to domestic interests, honor and dignity of Russia itself - they are silent, you see ... Well, this is about the lack of talent of the economic policy in Ukraine, about the insolvency of Poroshenko or Saakashvili’s ambitions, we have to yell on air to hear each of the viewers. And when it comes to more substantive things, including protecting the interests of Russia from the arbitrariness of bureaucrats in the international arena, everyone here pretends that “my hut is on the edge,” and that Russia, you know, is in his heart. Human rights activists do not find in themselves even a drop of desire to tell us - ordinary citizens - how they stood up for this defense, or at least ready to stand up. Apparently, discussing the gay marriage of Australian deputies or not giving Ukraine the IMF tranche is much more relevant for Russia.
Author:
Photos used:
1 channel
46 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Nix1986
    Nix1986 18 December 2017 07: 06
    22
    Soloviev right now in chocolate, he has a revolving scheme for choosing the theme of programs - Syria, Ukraine, USA shit, Europe - geyropa, GDP the sun. laughing
    1. Nicholas C.
      Nicholas C. 18 December 2017 07: 07
      20
      I have not watched talk shows from the central channels for a long time, more than a year, in view of the senselessness of the shows themselves and the senselessness of spending time on this. Politoluhi on call (except units) tired. I perceive the television channels that are holding Bandera and other bastards in the state or as such political half-ears, as occupational. Such will broadcast the Olympics under the white flag.
      Due to the fact that there is nothing to watch on the so-called central channels, the SPAS channel was discovered. It turns out that discussions in Russia still have not forgotten how to lead.
      1. dSK
        dSK 18 December 2017 07: 22
        +7
        Hello Nikolai
        Quote: Nikolai S.
        discovered the channel "SPAS"
        In 2008, he pleased the Orthodox television channel Soyuz, without annoying advertising. To which I have since sent my modest 500 rubles a year. Then there was the opportunity to watch Spas, to read Constantinople this year. I sometimes look at the "central" news and Putin's live broadcasts. hi
        1. Varyag_0711
          Varyag_0711 18 December 2017 09: 40
          26
          dsk Today, 07:22 ↑ New
          In 2008, he pleased the Orthodox television channel Soyuz, without annoying advertising. To which I have since sent my modest 500 rubles a year.
          Why is it so modest? The ROC will forgive you your sins for such pennies? request
          Then there was the opportunity to watch Spas, to read Constantinople this year.
          God help you! laughing
          I sometimes look at the "central" news and Putin's live broadcasts.
          It happens, but they say that not everyone passes.

          But seriously, I personally was already overwhelmed when I saw the inscription in the center of the hockey court on the goblet of the first channel. # RUSSIA IN MY HEART ... To say that I wanted to break up the TV means to say nothing. From all the airs, from all TV channels in unison, EVERYTHING from Solovyov and Kiselyov, to government officials and athletes were voted as we must be on this humiliation under the name OI 2018, as we will bring “Russia in our heart” and other nonsense that justifies national people shame of our sport. Although what the hell is he ours?
          When I see Sharapova, Kafelnikov, Ovechkin, Kovalchuk and other “our” athletes, it makes no difference to me. I understand perfectly well that these athletes are not ours and they protect their purely personal selfish interests, they wanted to spit on Russia and the fans. Everything is decided by the banal loot, here it is their real homeland and real god.
          Well, if so, then I personally do not give a damn about them and how they will once again make fun of them, moreover, I will rejoice at their next humiliation! The flag is in your hands, Messrs. Athletes (or rather, not a flag, but a shameful white rag) and a drum on your neck, oh yes, and another medal with a twist on the back, so that the IOC could take it harder then! laughing
        2. Alexander War
          Alexander War 18 December 2017 11: 22
          +5
          Constantinople myself watching! hi
      2. Alber
        Alber 18 December 2017 07: 24
        +1
        Quote: Nikolai S.
        I haven’t watched the show from the central channels for more than a year, in view of the senselessness of the shows themselves and the senselessness of spending time on this. Politoluhi on call (except units) tired. I perceive the television channels that are holding Bandera and other bastards in the state or as such political half-ears, as occupational.


        Odessa "Privoz"
      3. forester
        forester 18 December 2017 07: 36
        +4
        Ugh on them - I also do not look this guano! There are other more interesting ones - sports and non-fiction and educational, but from the central ones I only watch the “star”.
        1. Grandfather
          Grandfather 18 December 2017 07: 49
          +6
          television trash. nothing more to say ...
          1. Lexus
            Lexus 18 December 2017 09: 57
            10
            I am joining! Alas, there is nothing to watch ...
      4. AA17
        AA17 18 December 2017 10: 16
        +2
        Dear Nikolay S. Take a look at the OTR channel. There is a program "Reflection". The real folk program. A lot of stories, phone calls from real people from various regions of Russia live. This program must be watched by our Federal Government.
        1. turbris
          turbris 18 December 2017 17: 53
          +1
          AA17 - yes, by the way I confirm, I watched Reflection several times - I liked it!
      5. xetai9977
        xetai9977 18 December 2017 10: 48
        +4
        These talk shows do not cause anything disgust! For the sake of visibility, they give the floor to the opponent for a couple of seconds, and then the leading and specially invited “experts”, whose main task is to shout out those who do not fit into the general “correct” picture, abruptly cut off under the scream and squeal. And the presenters are generally a special case. There’s that presenter in the photo, I don’t know his name and I don’t want to know, the place is not in the studio, but in the gateway, in a cap and with a smoke. The physiognomy speaks for itself about its "intelligence"
    2. siberalt
      siberalt 18 December 2017 08: 26
      +4
      I completely agree with the author. People require spectacles, and therefore the ratings of these bazaar shows. Previously, there was one squealing Malakhov, but now it squeals through all channels from morning to night. Maybe this is considered a political entity for the people? belay You look at these tongue-in-cheek deputies, half-educated, but the herds of home-grown "political scientists" from the HSE or "RSU" become scary for the country. Any idiots like Kovtun and others. "Foreigners" pour dirt on us with impunity, and they also pay money for it. While we do not have a state ideology, we will swim in this fetid slurry.
    3. xetai9977
      xetai9977 18 December 2017 10: 50
      +8
      The essence of these talk shows: fooling the population.
      1. a.sirin
        a.sirin 18 December 2017 13: 16
        +2
        Write for those who do not know - WHO IS IT!
  2. Herculesic
    Herculesic 18 December 2017 07: 10
    11
    Alexey hi - The very concept of "human rights activist" compromised itself in the eyes of the people precisely with anti-people’s rhetoric, when they, in droves, herds, ran to the US embassies for instructions and money! And the show is one of the elements of weaning people from problems, from reality! After all, these kovtuns, amnuels, Suvorovs and others are paid for participation — that means, and then people can be led by the nose, showing dolls, but not showing either the problems of OUR country, or ways to solve them.
    1. Nonna
      Nonna 18 December 2017 10: 06
      +2
      Quote: Herkulesich
      And the show is one of the elements of weaning people from problems, from reality!


      The reality is that all these leading political shows, producers and channel leaders will sell their mother to their mother for fees, not just honor, intelligence and conscience. I do not mean invited Ukrainian "experts" or liberals - Mordovian camps cry for them all. This crowd extras acts as a lightning rod for our vile, corrupt power of the capitalist functionaries. For some reason, all these Scheinins and Norkins are silent about the opening of the board to Solzhenitsyn, why we, the Russian people, should celebrate his 100th birthday, traitor and sexot. This is let Putin personally celebrate with his wife, and not impose on the country and not at the expense of the state. They are silent about neutral athletes, and about sanezhjukovyh with muddy. Afraid - to lose feeders. But all sorts of freaks, such as Saakashvili-is please. Yes, the Russians do not need this Ukraine, just like Syria. But it’s quite safe for Kremlin propagandists to discuss Ukraine than the campaigns of sand on pederast performances at the Bolshoi Theater. If someone on the show starts talking about the case and about the painful, Shcheinin with Strizhenova and another bald one will quickly shut up their mouths and turn the arrows. The problems of Russia and the Russian, Russian people are not interested in power, as well as their propaganda mouthpieces in the form of all kinds of "political shows"
      1. TRex
        TRex 18 December 2017 11: 58
        10
        It would be nice to see how Channel One or Russia would invite an actor like Sechin or Miller, or Chubais to such a show at last ... Where and how will they be sent?
        Personally, I am interested in the topic of taxation in the country ... They introduced "Plato" for long-distance fighting - it's like in Europe, they raise the retirement age - like in Europe ... And you, bl ... b, introduce a progressive income tax like in Europe !! ! What weak?
        Ask Sechin - is he not ashamed to receive such income, being in the public service?
        Ask Chubais - what new technologies have appeared in the domestic industry over the past five to six years and where is the money, Zin?
        No, we are very interested in who else Spartak Mishulin blew 25 years ago, whether they dig up Muslim Magomayev, and how is the old Armenian doing without his young slut ...
        And what kind of audience is on these talk shows .... All the shit surfaced. And, most importantly, the same faces on all channels ... Inflate your cheeks, say all heresy ... Ugh !!!
  3. inkass_98
    inkass_98 18 December 2017 07: 12
    +8
    Again, a lot of words on a hackneyed topic. No need to watch this nonsense, the relevance of these talker contests is usually zero. I don’t watch this circus myself and don’t advise others, don’t wind up the ratings with these shows of the level of Malakhovschina and Toddler’s (even Petrosyanschina is no longer a measure of the bottom).
    It was somehow interesting in 2014 to look at verbal battles, but since then professional clicks have wandered from channel to channel in search of earnings.
  4. Knowing
    Knowing 18 December 2017 07: 12
    +2
    So, after all, those “human rights defenders” feed just from those who exert pressure on all these international committees and federations ... It’s no good to bark at the owner, however, he will take away a sugar bone.
  5. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 18 December 2017 07: 17
    +9
    ... a frank topic bazaar modern talk shows ...
    I completely agree with the author. Moreover, the "bazaar" comes from both sides and is often in favor of the "invitees" (registered) on these talk shows not for free and calmly leading their propaganda. A so-called human rights activists constantly bleat something and for the sake of the opposite side. And the motivation of the organizers of the show is simple to primitive - supposedly let the people see who is who. The people have long set up all the points for themselves over I and are well aware of what is happening. In the run for ratings, a sense of proportion and respect for the viewer is completely lost.
    1. dSK
      dSK 18 December 2017 07: 36
      +4
      Quote: rotmistr60
      In the run for ratings

      "Business and nothing personal." After privatization, the so-called central channels turned into private shops, the amount of advertising goes off scale, in one "advertising break" it is possible to have time ....
  6. parusnik
    parusnik 18 December 2017 08: 09
    +2
    Is this really happening on TV? .. I haven’t been watching and I won’t watch ... There are popular science channels and it’s normal ...
  7. mavrus
    mavrus 18 December 2017 08: 22
    +3
    Quote: Nix1986
    Soloviev right now in chocolate, he has a revolving scheme for choosing the theme of programs - Syria, Ukraine, USA shit, Europe - geyropa, GDP the sun. laughing

    Yes, even if such topics ... But why turn them into a bazaar. If there is no culture of disputation, then invite one and then others. Let them even speak out in turn. And then on all channels ... the same faces at the same time yelling interfering with each other. And the presenters, for some reason, consider it their duty to put the microphone in both one and the other, and the third ... who will overtake whom.
    Thanks to the author for defining the Bazaar Show.
  8. Seraphimamur
    Seraphimamur 18 December 2017 08: 25
    +7
    And who else is watching these bazaar shows? I know my mother-in-law, she’s 81, and after a stroke she watches them, because there they shout loudly and she has hearing problems. Is this the audience of these programs?
    1. sds87
      sds87 18 December 2017 11: 54
      +2
      Quote: Seraphimamur
      I now know my mother-in-law, she is 81

      I have a granny with a hearing - she is 97 years old. He also cuts the TV to the full, listening to all sorts of or-shows. I want to throw this zombie box out of the window. I don’t watch TV myself for a long time. And I do not suffer at all from this.
  9. cannabis
    cannabis 18 December 2017 08: 44
    0
    Idiots should not be given any objects. After all, it all started with the fact that they began to force fighters to watch "Serving the Soviet Union" and celebrate "Kurban Bayram" by unbelievers, Buddhists and Christians. Or maybe it's us that we believe in print, television, FM radio. In the last big war, the warring parties sang enemy songs - the Americans and the British sang "Lily Marlene", and the Germans listened to Negro jazz and Glenn Miller. Puppeteers realized their mistakes and turned off worldwide broadcasting on long and medium waves.
  10. Loess
    Loess 18 December 2017 09: 01
    +2
    The arguments in favor of his point of view again come down to the option "himself ...!"
    Most of the comments on VO are the same ... but someone pluses, probably likes ...
  11. Altona
    Altona 18 December 2017 09: 10
    +1
    I haven’t watched all these pseudo-discussions on the first channels for a long time, and I don’t watch Vladimir Solovyov’s Shabbat show either. I generally went on Twitter and there I discuss and give categorical assessments of what is happening. Since the audience is unique, I write tweets in a different style. I apply even profanity. I am writing in English, the IOC media recently unsubscribed that they are pure Nazis. For some reason, in 280 characters, I manage to fully convey my point of view. If anyone is following the news on Twitter, then I’m there under the name Kysha Russkaya (Kazakh. Russian mustard).
  12. wlkw
    wlkw 18 December 2017 09: 46
    0
    Yes, the bazaar is full, I used to look, now it’s not at all.
    Categorically.
  13. Bastinda
    Bastinda 18 December 2017 09: 48
    +4
    All against the zombie box, but comment in his own style, reading only the first part of the article.
    And then, the idea is pushed again that the IOC and WADA are bad. If I understood correctly, then these organizations, in their decision, tried (not particularly successfully) to show that they are not against athletes, but against official sports in Russia. Hence the slogans and screams on TV. Mutko, Zhukov and co. it is very necessary that they be identified with Russia, it’s easier to save a place in the event of “flight”, because you can rely on patriots!
    But in fact, it is worth deciding what Russia needs? Mutko and Zhukov? Sochi and the World Cup? Many million sports palaces?
    Or sports grounds in every yard, sports sections and circles in every school? Of course, you can’t get to the feeding trough on this, hard and inconspicuous work, because 99.9% of children will never shine on sports success on TV. But they will become a little healthier.
    1. Rimlianin
      Rimlianin 18 December 2017 14: 31
      +2
      And the most interesting thing was that there was doping. Whether this was organized by the state is another matter. Explicitly not proven. And because the chemical sportsmen took the medals, and then they were stripped, Mutko and Zhukov should have been kicked out a long time ago. But alas, he and Putin are guys from the same yard, but he does not abandon his own ..
  14. Overlock
    Overlock 18 December 2017 09: 53
    +6
    The level of mental development of the deputies became clear on the day when they drank champagne for Trump. In which country in the world does parliament drink champagne for someone else's President? Even banderlog did not think of such a thing! Russia is ahead again!
  15. Bulrumeb
    Bulrumeb 18 December 2017 10: 02
    +2
    The viewer spits on the screen, but can already do nothing with itself, having fallen into a real addiction

    I don’t know who and how, but I don’t look at this vomit and I’m not going to watch it, my homework too
  16. andrej-shironov
    andrej-shironov 18 December 2017 10: 25
    +5
    Dear Alexey! And what do you want: society is degrading, TV is degrading. I have not watched the central channels for a long time, especially Pushkov, Solovyov and others like them. Continuous and sometimes not smart propaganda.
  17. Altona
    Altona 18 December 2017 11: 08
    +2
    Quote: Bastinda
    But in fact, it is worth deciding what Russia needs? Mutko and Zhukov? Sochi and the World Cup? Many million sports palaces?

    --------------------------
    The government is already cutting sports spending by 35% in 2018 and 66% in 2019, and that's the whole story. Apparently they already suspect that they will squeeze us out of world sports.
  18. Mihail55
    Mihail55 18 December 2017 12: 04
    +1
    Quote: Bastinda
    But in fact, it is worth deciding what Russia needs? Mutko and Zhukov? Sochi and the World Cup? Many million sports palaces?
    Or sports grounds in every yard, sports sections and circles in every school? Of course, you can’t get to the feeding trough on this, hard and inconspicuous work, because 99.9% of children will never shine on sports success on TV. But they will become a little healthier.

    Absolutely, I agree with you. I’ll just fix it a bit, not “a little”, MUCH healthier! For those who are already over 50, and to someone more, they found factory Olympiads, competitions between enterprises, a game of volleyball at lunch. Winter trips to the sports base, skiing, air ... communication !!! And moreover, everything is FREE! With all the minuses of the USSR, how could this be destroyed for the sake of the current sports BROTHER?
  19. Rimlianin
    Rimlianin 18 December 2017 14: 26
    +1
    Of all the channels of the first ten more or less TVC. Roman Babayan with his voting right can be heard. Smart man, gives everyone a chance to talk. Kovtunov does not invite. Plus topics are not only international, but also about Russia.
  20. Glory1974
    Glory1974 18 December 2017 15: 59
    0
    Guys make money. as they say business and nothing personal. According to media reports, for example, Michael Bom, receives 20 000-30 000 rubles per hour of television. Naturally, he has already received Russian citizenship. Because for a day of working with the tongue, it receives like a week of "plowing" in the USA.
    The well-known Kovtun has long been bought an apartment in Moscow. For this, he will not endure blows to his bald spot two or three times.
    So it turns out that the people suffer, and someone profits. To whom is war, and to whom is mother dear?
  21. turbris
    turbris 18 December 2017 17: 50
    0
    I absolutely agree with the author, the talk show is a failure and further degradation of our television, no matter what ratings they draw for themselves. The same topics, the same invited people who have already expressed everything in previous shows, aggressive presenters who are not at all concerned about the topic under discussion - the main thing is to heat up the situation and create a scandal. I consider absolute degradation programs about famous artists who have died, erasing dirty laundry together with the remaining relatives causes outright disgust and shame.
  22. Olegi1
    Olegi1 18 December 2017 20: 32
    +1
    Soloviev, when he appeared, was interesting. Now - a dull guano. The same faces, the same topics. He himself, of course, burns nothing with a verb, but I definitely did not turn it on for a couple of years. 60 seconds is also a song. Top extravaganza - News of the week with Kiselev.

    On the other hand, the United States is doing the same thing. Well, we need such an answer. In any case, the agenda is positive and patriotic is better than what was broadcast to us in the 90s, who remembers. Although this and that was not true.
  23. leonid-zherebtcov
    leonid-zherebtcov 20 December 2017 17: 50
    0
    Alas ... naked verbiage with roaming channels .... "talkers."
  24. Alexander Ra
    Alexander Ra 20 December 2017 17: 53
    0
    Is it not strange when the same adults have been meeting for years on these shows and do not create something meaningful socially and helping our lives with the help of words and their brains. Opposing interests within society and, please, pluralism of opinions. Is it possible with a pluralism of formulas, calculations, approaches to get a tractor from the conveyor? That word is swan, then cancer, then pike. By carving out emotions from jumping on various topics, an information swill is brewed. TV is a super-tool - like a debilizer. Something is wrong in our house.
  25. tank64rus
    tank64rus 21 December 2017 20: 59
    0
    And who owns the TV channels. That they have analogues Ksenia do not get off the screens see everything. And modern films are so poor in quality that they are obviously designed for patients of ward No. 6. But there’s nothing to say about the premiere of ballet in the Bolshoi. And the throne of one of these figures of "culture" for the embezzlement of the guard. It all rotted in the bud.
  26. Radikal
    Radikal 22 December 2017 01: 16
    0
    Friends, can anyone name the name of at least one human rights activist who would find even a drop of courage and prepare a report on the violation of the rights of Russian athletes by international bureaucrats from sports? At least one of these advocates of human rights made a point against introducing the principle of, in fact, collective responsibility. Against the principle introduced by organizations that position themselves as regulators of relations in the sports and legal environment. Where are all these human rights foundations, artels, groups, councils, teams and so on, etc., which have a black and white text in the charter that says they need to protect human rights regardless of their nationality, religion, age, and attitude to politics?
    As where?! In the Kremlin! State prize from the hands of the Guarantor receive! lol
  27. Kolaaps
    Kolaaps 22 December 2017 12: 40
    0
    "......- You know, but I liked the performance.
    - Seriously?
    - No, not everything is equally good, not everything is smooth ... but there is the main thing - the chairs are intact! " (with)