Bondarev: Russia will not allow the US to destabilize Syria again

84
By training militants in Syria, the US is preparing a new bridgehead to destabilize it, but Russia will help the Syrian authorities to prevent this, said Chairman of the Federation Council Committee on Defense and Security Viktor Bondarev.

Bondarev: Russia will not allow the US to destabilize Syria again




They will not simply leave Syria (Americans), and quietly prepare a springboard to destabilize the situation. For its part, Russia will help. We maintain our base in Hmeimim, and also are going to develop the port in Tartus, turning it into a full-fledged naval base.
- The senator said, expressing confidence in the willingness of the president of the UAR Bashar Assad to resist attempts to shake up the situation in the country.

According to the senator, Washington is dissatisfied with Russia's serious geopolitical successes in the Middle East, and therefore tries again to turn to the tactics of using terrorists to foment a new conflict.

He noted that it was not the first time that Americans support terrorists and other destructive forces. According to the senator, Washington is “not haunted” by the success of Russia in Syria (both military and geopolitical), as well as the normalization of the situation in this country, “which they, like Libya, tried to destroy.”

Earlier media reported that the Russian Center for Reconciliation of the warring parties in Syria announced the creation of US instructors from scattered militant groups of the New Syrian Army armed unit to fight government forces.

Franz Klintsevich, First Deputy Chairman of the Council of the Federation Committee on Defense and Security, believes that Washington’s support of terrorists is drawn to the strategy of the 1980s, when it supported the Afghan Mujahideen weapons and finances in their fight against the Soviet army.
84 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +12
    16 December 2017 20: 02
    The Americans will not begin the next military adventure, but they will not refuse to cutthroats. The question is rather about the restoration of the country, the vertical of power, the system of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Judiciary. The faster the authorities can start the reconstruction process itself, the greater the chance to save the country. The Americans are now likely to put the authorities on the internal opposition, but whether this opposition will become a new beginning of ISIS depends on Assad
    1. +13
      16 December 2017 20: 09
      It seems to me that the United States wants to create an alternative Syria and continue the war.
      1. +7
        16 December 2017 20: 11
        Quote: Going
        It seems to me that the United States wants to create an alternative Syria and continue the war.

        Starting from scratch is very difficult, even for Americans. This will require serious investments, you can try a new adventure, for example with Korea
        1. +14
          16 December 2017 20: 19
          And they do not have an empty place at all, the base of autumn is not even bad and they are already doing it.
          1. +2
            16 December 2017 20: 21
            Quote: Going
            And they do not have an empty place at all, the base of autumn is not even bad and they are already doing it.

            What is the base? Their ISIL team was under occupation of 90% of Syria and 70% of Iraq, and now there is one base, you are so kind, it's just zero!
            1. +8
              16 December 2017 20: 36
              Please admire and there they have been creating a "new Syria" for half a year already .:
              1. +4
                17 December 2017 00: 21
                Quote: Going
                Please admire and there they have been creating a "new Syria" for half a year already .:

                This alignment of forces on the map is already outdated both in green zones and in black. As for the Kurdish jaundice, the mattresses do not feel confident there either, the more the Kurds made a statement that their units will be part of the Syrian Arab army subordinate to Damascus, and this is about 60 thousand bayonets. Turkey for Americans will not be a pillar in the north of Syria because mattresses showed the Turks that for the sake of their interests, they can even put a “bolt” on their NATO ally and bluntly arm the Kurds to the detriment of the Turks. Now the Kurdish issue will be resolved without the participation of Americans, and therefore the number of flags of mattresses in the yellow zone will tend to zero. Of course, they will spoil mattresses everywhere, even without them, but not through their own hands, but through terrorists who have found shelter under a star-striped flag.
              2. 0
                17 December 2017 08: 22
                Quote: Going
                Please admire and there they have been creating a "new Syria" for half a year already .:

                After the Americans refused the Kurds to support the construction of Kurdistan, this card does not work, the Kurds were very offended
      2. +3
        16 December 2017 20: 14
        Quote: Going
        It seems to me that the United States wants to create an alternative Syria and continue the war.

        Or maybe you should not wait for the "creation of a new Syria", but it is worth destroying the birth of the Vyrodoks in the bud, and not look at the "public opinion" of Western noobs!
        1. +6
          16 December 2017 20: 17
          I agree, but for this it is necessary to squeeze the United States out of Syria.
          1. +6
            16 December 2017 21: 37
            Bondarev: Russia will not allow the US to destabilize Syria again

            It is gratifying to read this; I am waiting (and not just me) for reinforcing words with actions. soldier
            1. +5
              16 December 2017 21: 43
              Eh, there are a lot of hoteliers, but the reality is harsh.
              1. +5
                16 December 2017 21: 48
                Victor, below Garik recalled our morning arguments on the United States in Syria and what I advised to do. wink Yes
                1. +6
                  16 December 2017 21: 51
                  This is so, but the USA listens and eats.
                  1. +4
                    16 December 2017 21: 56
                    Victor, don’t worry, let them eat. they need calories_ the road home is long. anyway, the Yankees, under great pressure on the general mood in the BV, will run the devils, probably earlier than the SCAD from the hangar.
                    1. +5
                      16 December 2017 22: 28
                      I don’t worry, I just know that devils need to be finished.
                  2. +5
                    16 December 2017 21: 57
                    And after all, I voiced the most obvious version of the actions, and you can conceive of them a lot ... bully
                    1. +4
                      16 December 2017 22: 04
                      I generally suspect that MO draws fresh thoughts from VO. so, more tips for the ana analytic service of the MO. yo, joking of course. but...
                      1. +5
                        16 December 2017 22: 08
                        There is a joke in every joke, Garik. Sometimes an amateur can express such an idea that the entire General Staff will be protected from delight. Yes
                      2. +4
                        16 December 2017 22: 13
                        Max, modest. you have very good operational thinking.
                    2. +5
                      16 December 2017 22: 40
                      Quote: Jedi
                      There is a joke in every joke, Garik. Sometimes an amateur can express such an idea that the entire General Staff will be protected from delight. Yes


                      We are going the right way.
                      1. +5
                        16 December 2017 22: 42
                        Quote: Going
                        We are going the right way.

                        Judging by the US reaction, it is. Yes
                    3. +5
                      16 December 2017 22: 55
                      Quote: Jedi
                      [Judging by the US reaction, it is. Yes


                      If they pee in boiling water, then we are right.
            2. +4
              16 December 2017 21: 45
              Max, not so long ago as today, you and I told Bondarev the correct vector.
              1. +5
                16 December 2017 21: 46
                But will he actually take advantage of the prepared diversion plan? wink
                1. +3
                  16 December 2017 21: 51
                  Well, I think so. he would not dare to say this if it were not for the general attitude at the top.
                  1. +4
                    16 December 2017 21: 58
                    But you can come up with something else if you wish ... feel
                    1. +4
                      16 December 2017 22: 06
                      of course!
                  2. +5
                    16 December 2017 22: 18
                    Quote: newbie
                    Max, modest. you have very good operational thinking.

                    Well, yes, this is one of my shortcomings - a modest me. I am a tactician, but strategists are sitting in the General Staff.
                    1. +4
                      16 December 2017 22: 29
                      here it is here in the matter of blocking the base (s) of the Yankees need a cold-blooded and stale tactic. after all, you can even arrange mass protests of civilians in the refugee camp near the Yankee camp, all sorts of police and formations controlled by the SAA, to throw the Yankees into a blockade of all communications, naturally, all this under the hood of our air defense / airborne forces.
                      1. +4
                        16 December 2017 22: 33
                        I would have been engaged in sabotage, but the General Staff knows better. wink
                    2. +5
                      16 December 2017 22: 29
                      Our "General Staff" is better, we know better, we are from the outside and generally smart. laughing
                      1. +5
                        16 December 2017 22: 34
                        Yeah, and then slowly go down and reluctantly the whole herd ... feel
                    3. +5
                      16 December 2017 22: 42
                      Quote: Jedi
                      Yeah, and then slowly go down and reluctantly the whole herd ... feel

                      Well, this is not a classic, but we are all strategists.
                      1. +3
                        16 December 2017 22: 53
                        Quote: Going
                        and so we are all strategists.

                        To the best of my education, of course. lol
            3. +3
              16 December 2017 21: 49
              Max, I think, Bondarev is not exaggerating. He saw the whole world, and NATO was dumbfounded by the mobile capabilities of the RF Armed Forces. Well, the possibilities of new weapons can also be considered confirmation of the words of the general
              1. +5
                16 December 2017 21: 53
                Most of all they were surprised by the speed of the transfer of material resources and funds; turnips are still scratched.
                1. +5
                  16 December 2017 22: 01
                  that's right. if we still have a couple of fresh UDC, or BDK in addition to those available as part of the Syrian Express.
                  1. +5
                    16 December 2017 22: 32
                    Even the old people worked on Ur.
          2. +2
            17 December 2017 00: 03
            Quote: Going
            I agree, but for this it is necessary to squeeze the United States out of Syria.

            Skunk does not live where he is not allowed. I repeat, colleague - let Assad look for grandmother and equip the border. Oh, and not the KCC, such a gravitap weighs, but these themselves will begin to bring down the bureaucrats from there. Our border guards will take them to MI-26s, along with "the world's most powerful helicopters."
          3. +1
            17 December 2017 00: 40
            This is just unreal.
        2. +2
          16 December 2017 22: 23
          Do you think anyone is there around the clock with the use of TU-22 in the last three weeks have been hammering? More than one hundred experienced enemies, who now would definitely be in the ranks of these notorious democrats, have been utilized.
      3. +4
        16 December 2017 21: 00
        No one was surprised that suddenly we had such a super Pearist "Bondarev" who, suddenly, knows everything, everything can
    2. +6
      16 December 2017 20: 22
      Again Bondarev PR, Or from the criminal case winds, Or in the editorial office of VO kum or kuma sits
      1. +2
        16 December 2017 21: 08
        Quote: Chertt
        Again Bondarev PR

        the entire news line has become the platform of Bondarev, I just do not know where he was going to run and what position?
  2. +7
    16 December 2017 20: 02
    Franz Klintsevich, First Deputy Chairman of the Federation Council Committee on Defense and Security, believes that Washington is turning to the 1980 strategy when it supported the Afghan mujahideen with weapons and finances in their fight against the Soviet army.


    They will ride on a rake, this is their right.
    1. +2
      16 December 2017 20: 20
      Quote: Going
      Franz Klintsevich, First Deputy Chairman of the Federation Council Committee on Defense and Security, believes that Washington is turning to the 1980 strategy when it supported the Afghan mujahideen with weapons and finances in their fight against the Soviet army.


      They will ride on a rake, this is their right.

      You, the Russians, will ride the rake if the United States and the company begin to realize the Afghan scenario. You quickly forget how the war in Afghanistan ruined the powerful Union. The modern RF near the USSR is just a pale shadow.
      1. +7
        16 December 2017 20: 41
        Quote: katana
        You, the Russians, will ride the rake if the United States and the company begin to realize the Afghan scenario. You quickly forget how the war in Afghanistan ruined the powerful Union. The modern RF near the USSR is just a pale shadow.

        The company with the staff is not the same. The Union was killed, including you, the Armenians and other Natsik from the national republic, and about the shadow, because in the Armenian cartoon "the shadow is not a shadow but a half-city covers" and Russia covers Armenians from Turks and Azerbaijan
        1. +2
          16 December 2017 21: 33
          Hey bijo, you write, but don’t lie - the Soviet Union was destroyed by the leaders of three Slavic countries in 1991, and the USSR withdrew the troops from Afghanistan in 1989. And what does Russia "cover from Turks and Azerbaijanis" by supplying dozens of arms to the Azerbaijani army billions of dollars? You’ll start to write that the Russians conquered Karabakh from the Azerbaijanis and gave the Armenians out of kindness. wassat laughing
          1. 0
            17 December 2017 10: 58
            According to Wikipedia, I was not there, therefore I refer to sources, Armenia in August 1990 declared its independence, and in September, 95 percent of Armenians voted for secession from the USSR at a referendum. You were not the only ones who were Georgians, Moldovans, Balts, did the same. The leaders of the three Slavic states at that time simply stated the fact of the collapse of the country. Does Russia not cover Armenians? Hold a referendum on the expulsion of the military base of the Russian Federation from the territory of Armenia, vote 95 percent against the base, we will leave. And then look at further events.
      2. +6
        16 December 2017 20: 49
        and where did you get such ardent confidence? by chance not from the manuals of the National Liberals? Your comment is simply saturated with cliches. The army is not the same, the Russian Federation is not the same, all the misses of Afghanistan have been taken into account, to which are examples of the actions of the RF Armed Forces.
        1. +5
          16 December 2017 21: 18
          I repeat, but I have the impression that this youngster indulges. Hi Garik! hi
          1. +4
            16 December 2017 21: 39
            Victor, welcome. indeed, the impression is that it sets out the platform of some sort of liberals, from a brochure found somewhere.
            1. +6
              16 December 2017 21: 45
              No need to "feed" him and he will depart.
        2. +2
          16 December 2017 21: 38
          Quote: newbie
          and where did you get such ardent confidence? by chance not from the manuals of the National Liberals? Your comment is simply saturated with cliches. The army is not the same, the Russian Federation is not the same, all the misses of Afghanistan have been taken into account, to which are examples of the actions of the RF Armed Forces.

          Brezhnev and Andropov also thought that everything would be type-top, everything’s taken into account. But Afghanistan turned out to be the straw that broke the camel’s back. fellow Adjus, land.
          1. +5
            16 December 2017 21: 43
            dear man, you still have a lot to read, a lot to study, taking into account your conclusions and theses. in short, you are not right around.
      3. A.
        +1
        16 December 2017 21: 34
        What a pro-Western zhzhlz wound up on the site.
      4. +2
        16 December 2017 21: 42
        katana The Russian Federation next to the USSR is just a pale shadow.

        WHO argues, therefore, the Russian Federation needs to get rid of non-core assets, for example, Armenia, there is no sense for it for the Russian Federation (either economically, politically, or militarily), the Nagorno-Karabakh problem will be resolved immediately, I think fellow countrymen from France and the USA, if that helps you ....
        1. 0
          17 December 2017 12: 13
          Quote: MOSKVITYANIN
          katana The Russian Federation next to the USSR is just a pale shadow.

          WHO argues, therefore, the Russian Federation needs to get rid of non-core assets, for example, Armenia, there is no sense for it for the Russian Federation (either economically, politically, or militarily), the Nagorno-Karabakh problem will be resolved immediately, I think fellow countrymen from France and the USA, if that helps you ....

          There is no hope for fellow countrymen, there even the FBI is looking for our patriot, that on the Internet he urged to start shooting the ruling zionopilniki here ...
          And here we become the 1001st province of the PRC with autonomous rights - oh, how it will help ...
          Moreover, as a familiar kungfuist told me, in China there are wall notes that our Tigran the Great has Chinese roots ...
          1. 0
            17 December 2017 18: 16
            Karen There is no hope for fellow countrymen, there even the FBI is looking for our patriot

            Strange, but in the periodicals I read that Armenians and “gear” have a strong influence on the American government through their diasporas, apparently you slander the FBI orphans ...
            1. 0
              17 December 2017 18: 38
              The USA has been owned by Jews for 240 years, and they will not give their dairy cow to anyone ... Anglo-Saxons can only be content with bits and pieces from their table ...
              I once wrote for Seal - the United States participated in WWI from the very beginning, though implicitly - the Jewish United States sent 5-6 battleships to guard the Turkish coast near the port of Adana from a possible landing of the Anglo-French squadron ... And the goods were transported from Palestine to Istanbul...
    2. +3
      16 December 2017 21: 51
      Or traditional rake ritual dances?
      1. +5
        16 December 2017 22: 33
        There are not even jumps, but jumps from a height.
      2. +5
        16 December 2017 22: 46
        I didn’t suspect that there were such dances ... I’m getting older, I guess - I lagged behind modernity. lol
        1. +3
          16 December 2017 23: 03
          We do not know the traditions of all the peoples of the world, but it is a pity. Maybe someone would help wink
  3. +2
    16 December 2017 20: 10
    Quote: APASUS
    The Americans will not begin the next military adventure, but they will not refuse to cutthroats. The question is rather about the restoration of the country, the vertical of power, the system of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Judiciary. The faster the authorities can start the reconstruction process itself, the greater the chance to save the country. The Americans are now likely to put the authorities on the internal opposition, but whether this opposition will become a new beginning of ISIS depends on Assad

    It’s precisely noticed. Now the whole situation in the country depends on Assad. And for some reason, it seems to me that he will not dare to “face the dirt” after such colossal assistance from Russia. Only together and together can we confront this bunch of hypocritical and deceitful representatives of white at home.
    1. +3
      16 December 2017 20: 15
      Quote: Romanych.by
      Quote: APASUS
      The Americans will not begin the next military adventure, but they will not refuse to cutthroats. The question is rather about the restoration of the country, the vertical of power, the system of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Judiciary. The faster the authorities can start the reconstruction process itself, the greater the chance to save the country. The Americans are now likely to put the authorities on the internal opposition, but whether this opposition will become a new beginning of ISIS depends on Assad

      It’s precisely noticed. Now the whole situation in the country depends on Assad. And for some reason, it seems to me that he will not dare to “face the dirt” after such colossal assistance from Russia. Only together and together can we confront this bunch of hypocritical and deceitful representatives of white at home.

      What, in your opinion, should this tragicomic character Assad do, “after the colossal help of Russia?” How should he act - the person who brought Syria to such a state.
      1. +5
        16 December 2017 20: 32
        Quote: katana
        How should he act - the man who brought Syria to such a state.

        The first one. To shoot and hang all the traitors who are still amused with hopes of revenge.
        The second one. Announce an ultimatum to the Americans and give time for fees from the territory of a sovereign state.
        The third. Shell the territory of military bases with the destruction of everything that is there.
        Fourth. Put AAR state flags on the site of former American bases ...
  4. +2
    16 December 2017 20: 21
    Judging by the photograph, Comrade Bondarev is a stern man. But I tend to trust stern men, however. Because, as in severe muzchin, I did not forget, Uesh, however. It is important!
    1. +2
      16 December 2017 21: 02
      Quote: Petrol cutter
      Judging by the photograph, Comrade Bondarev is a stern man.

      Very similar to the creature of the General Swan, (burn it in hell)
  5. +3
    16 December 2017 20: 27
    Russia will not allow? Who will ask you? Until the end of the century, will you make excuses to the Americans and ask them to leave the illegally occupied territories in Syria ... And, after an ultimatum warning, get out within three days, did you try to clean up with bombs and "Caliber"? What are you looking at them? Soon in the Far East they will occupy the bay (to control the sea communications of Russia) and we will write notes of protest ... crying
    The poor in spirit cannot defeat Russia. They can’t ... The whole world assumes this, it remains to demonstrate ...
    1. +10
      16 December 2017 20: 37
      Quote: Esoteric
      Russia will not allow? Who will ask you?

      Well, how to say ... the first attempt with ISIS (* let it not be named) did not seem to work, right?
      Quote: Esoteric
      ask them to leave the illegally occupied territories in Syria

      IMHO they will be squeezed out by Turks, Iranians and Smriyans. Since neither the first nor the second nor, especially, the third - the presence of the "exceptional" there ... didn’t rest on the side, in general.
      And how they will do it (and with whose help, especially the Syrians) - they will tell you in 50 years ... maybe.
      Quote: Esoteric
      And, after an ultimatum warning to get out in a three-day period, they did not try to clean up with bombs and "Caliber"?

      On what, excuse me, basis? Americans in Syrian territory have a Syrian problem. Not the Russian Federation.
      Quote: Esoteric
      Soon they will occupy the bay in the Far East (to control the sea communications of Russia), and we will write notes of protest ...

      But "this is unlikely" (c) Red Army Sukhov laughing
  6. 0
    16 December 2017 20: 46
    Everything points to the "Afghan" scenario for the development of the situation in Syria. The Americans will be in every possible way: in the political arena, both financially and militarily, to support the "dissatisfied with Assad." Now they will regroup the remnants from the IS, arm them and send small detachments to various cities of Syria for terrorist attacks, recruiting the dissatisfied, creating terrorist enclaves within the country, etc. This is simplified by the fact that Assad’s forces are limited and cannot cover all directions, and the content is large Army is very expensive for a war-ravaged country. Actually, the whole plan of the United States and its allies consists in dragging out the conflict by all means, preventing the country from taking a break from it and regaining its strength; on the contrary, they need to cause the Syrian people to be as tired from this war as possible and point out that it will be so until Assad and his clique are in power.
    1. +1
      16 December 2017 21: 15
      Quote: Monster_Fat
      Everything points to the "Afghan" scenario for the development of the situation in Syria.

      You are exaggerating a little, Putin, as a judoka (I hope you do not need to translate) Will do as always beautiful, But what is softness and strength, This is a new strategy of the Russian Ministry of Defense
  7. 0
    16 December 2017 20: 49
    Type future president
  8. +3
    16 December 2017 20: 56
    “They (Syria - approx.) So simply will not leave Syria and quietly prepare the bridgehead again to destabilize the situation.


    It’s no longer quiet, but they openly say that we won’t leave Syria and built a bunch of bases both in the north and in the south.
  9. A.
    +2
    16 December 2017 21: 40
    Quote: katana
    Quote: Romanych.by
    Quote: APASUS
    The Americans will not begin the next military adventure, but they will not refuse to cutthroats. The question is rather about the restoration of the country, the vertical of power, the system of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Judiciary. The faster the authorities can start the reconstruction process itself, the greater the chance to save the country. The Americans are now likely to put the authorities on the internal opposition, but whether this opposition will become a new beginning of ISIS depends on Assad

    It’s precisely noticed. Now the whole situation in the country depends on Assad. And for some reason, it seems to me that he will not dare to “face the dirt” after such colossal assistance from Russia. Only together and together can we confront this bunch of hypocritical and deceitful representatives of white at home.

    What, in your opinion, should this tragicomic character Assad do, “after the colossal help of Russia?” How should he act - the person who brought Syria to such a state.

    And a character like you should continue to lick all the places to the west and their minions.
    1. +1
      16 December 2017 21: 50
      Which he does on every news thread ...
  10. +5
    16 December 2017 22: 26
    Chairman of the Council of Federation Committee on Defense and securitywho is Bondarev, besides, how will he not allow to destabilize Syria should he undertake a similar concern for his country? If "yes", then why the hell are military Bandera structures throughout Russia and under his nose, in the center of Moscow, chasing their smelly videos ??? But he does not see this and only worry about Syria.
  11. 0
    17 December 2017 02: 06
    Dude hike ratings
    speaking out for every occasion. And all retype it.
    And then again, and the accusation of a bribe, as we practice.)))
  12. 0
    17 December 2017 08: 04
    The man has 400 sorties in the first and second Chechen companies.
    Hero of Russia.
    Retired.
    Now he can say what he thinks
    What could be the claim.
  13. 0
    17 December 2017 13: 29
    The Second World War had not yet ended, and the Americans and the British had already begun to collect Nazi prisoners of war and formed companies, battalions and regiments from them for possible counterattack to the rear of our units. So they did not come up with anything new, but use the old experience. Russia now must resolutely continue the destruction of these nascent formations, despite the opposition of the Americans. An unfinished snake stings harder - as they say in the East.
  14. 0
    17 December 2017 17: 51
    Bondarev: Russia will not allow the US to destabilize Syria again
    Right! I support! I agree!
  15. +4
    17 December 2017 18: 02
    It’s time for Assad to start “wetting” the Yankees on their territory as occupiers, however. UNU will have nothing to say, and our air defense will be trained, if that. drinks