Russia increased investment in US securities

145
Russia in October increased investment in the securities of the United States government from 103, 9 billion to 105 billion, follows from the data of the US Treasury.

Russia increased investment in US securities




In August, Russia's investments in US government bonds amounted to 105,4 billion dollars, in September, this amount fell to 103,9 billion dollars, but in October this figure reached 105 billion dollars. This is one of the most significant figures for the entire 2017 year. Most of the funds in US securities of the Russian Federation kept in May - 108,7 billion dollars.

The Russian Federation is now on the 15 place among other states on investments in bonds of the American government. The first place is occupied by the People's Republic of China, which invested trillion dollars in these assets of 1,189. Japan ranks second - 1,093 trillions of dollars. Ireland rose to the third position - 312,4 billion dollars.

In October, foreign countries owned 6,349 trillion-dollar United States securities.
  • Reuters
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

145 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +34
    16 December 2017 16: 07
    This is some tricky move by our government. what . Asymmetric response request
    1. +50
      16 December 2017 16: 15
      For such a tricky move, one biblical character cut down thirty, as you remember. ...
      1. +54
        16 December 2017 16: 20
        GDP in monetary terms has grown, although the volume of production has not been changed .. Is there money to be spent on? Do you put things in order in medicine in the countryside or in education (they will not give poor returns). .
        Quote: Herkulesich
        For such a tricky move, one biblical character cut down thirty, as you remember. ...
        1. +21
          16 December 2017 16: 25
          Quote: 210ox
          Money then where to put it?

          Yes, in the economy all the way through. Comrades, do you not know the army of Paulus has already been knocked out of Stalingrad, or are there more battles?
          1. +4
            16 December 2017 16: 53
            Well, correctly buy for petrodollars from the Chinese or Belarusians.
          2. +1
            17 December 2017 14: 06
            creepy, and unfortunately there are enough such "landscapes" in the vast expanses of the former Union ... it’s a shame, but to change
        2. +14
          16 December 2017 16: 28
          Quote: 210ox
          Monetary GDP has grown, although output has not changed.

          Not GDP grew, but the ruble depreciated and its volume increased. Mugabe’s GDP was actually expressed in quadrillion local currencies, but what's the point?

          1. +4
            17 December 2017 05: 31
            Quote: Young_Communist
            But what's the point?

            How good is that. For joy. Who else has a car of money? wink
            A man went for bread ...

            And the boy was given a chewing gum ...
    2. +3
      16 December 2017 16: 21
      Russia has a growing volume of trade with the United States: for the first half of 2017 by 22%. Relations develop with them - that’s why they don’t reduce investments.
    3. +4
      16 December 2017 16: 26
      Quote: Aristarkh Lyudvigovich
      This is some tricky move by our government. what . Asymmetric response request

      That’s just the cat .. hehe hell March cats will begin to howl on March 18!
      1. +10
        16 December 2017 16: 32
        Quote: Hunter
        That's so cat .. hehe

        Vitaly, you would have changed the profile picture. And then you’ll go to the bathhouse again. No, well, I understand that you live here. But nonetheless.
    4. +12
      16 December 2017 16: 54
      Quote: Aristarkh Ludwigovich
      This is some tricky move of our government. Asymmetric response

      Here it is ... I’m meaning, in the "economic decisions of the government" I stopped looking, for ten years .... the brain is overheating and requires beer
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. The comment was deleted.
    5. +19
      16 December 2017 16: 55
      No tricky move. Everything is trite. US Treasury Securities (Treasury) - THIS IS REAL US MONEY. Dollars are essentially the Fed’s money. Th Ministry of Finance holds money in the most popular means of payment in the world - dollars, euros, gold, yuan and treasuries. Traders are bought on the secondary market, that is, the money we pay is not the United States, including the tale of our great investments in the American economy - an ordinary PR bike that is fashionable to speculate on. Why is it that we keep the money in dollars and euros too. Also, financiers like to invest in treasury, because they are easy to sell and can be speculated on their course, especially if there is any kind of insider. request
      The Chinese in Treasury hold the most money and no one blames them for this. Are the Chinese stupid according to our "experts"? belay
    6. +1
      16 December 2017 17: 24
      Quote: Aristarkh Ludwigovich
      This is some tricky move of our government. Asymmetric response

      No, this is a global financial system. Yes Do you want to feel confident and always have working capital in the global financial system? Kindly buy highly liquid US paper Yes
      The Russian Federation is now in 15th place among other states for investment in bonds of the US government
      .Ai, yy, yy, if not prestigious, they are not even in the top ten lol
    7. +5
      16 December 2017 17: 42
      So this is zrad !!! Invest in an America you hate
      1. +5
        16 December 2017 20: 22
        Quote: Shiryonay
        Invest in an America you hate

        Vashcheta, this is a ransom of bills. You, as a Jew, should know this move.
    8. Alf
      +8
      16 December 2017 18: 02
      Quote: Aristarkh Ludwigovich
      This is some tricky move by our government.

      To nourish the economy of an enemy state with money so that it takes and bursts.
    9. +8
      16 December 2017 18: 43
      Well, how is it ... Putin said the government works well, the policy is conservative, "so as not to inflate bubbles in the economy," we don’t invest in the economy, we invest in a small pill just in case. the question of their freezing for some reason does not scare. The trouble is that this policy of norms works in conditions of a flow of petrodollars, such as zero, and when there is no money already, squeezing the money supply and, as a result of economic activity, can lead to a default of type 98. Speaking of education in Russia, the “last call” cool movie: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aeEdTZWdx2I
    10. +3
      16 December 2017 19: 15
      Yeah. And Russian banks burst (in fact) one after another. Opening. BIN, Promsvyazbank. One should not even talk about small jars, from 1 to 3 per week, like rotten tomatoes.
      And all a bunch. You are on the right track, comrades.
      1. +6
        16 December 2017 20: 24
        Quote: den3080
        And Russian banks burst (in fact) one after another

        And you still call them "Russian" ?!
    11. +7
      16 December 2017 19: 23
      Our government is doing the right thing. Firstly, it is only 25% of the country's gold and foreign currency reserves, and secondly, gold and foreign currency reserves for gold and foreign currency reserves, which, in addition to gold, also consist of liquid (quickly converted into any money) currencies - dollars, euros, etc., and thirdly, these 105 billion dollars are at 2-3% on average, that is, annually this gives a plus of 3 billion dollars annually, which is enough for example for 100 T-90 tanks ...
      The United States pays Russia %% for these bonds for which you can build 100 tanks per year))) Is this bad ?! I think no...
      1. +1
        17 December 2017 15: 14
        Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
        This is bad?! I think no

        I also think that at this stage at the moment when oil has risen slightly and the dollars from the proceeds must be put off somewhere, then they have fussed. Here we also need to remember that our Bank can issue as many rubles in a certain proportion as we buy dollars (such conditions exist, their mother’s feet). Well, brainwash how much rubles will be invested in our economy with their release?
        As the saying goes, "Caesar is Caesar's, but give to God that which belongs to God." Bucks for partners - get yourself rubles.
        1. +7
          17 December 2017 22: 43
          Quote: Irokez
          our Bank can issue as many rubles in a certain proportion as we buy dollars (such conditions exist, their mother’s feet)

          This is where such a miracle comes from, enlighten?
      2. 0
        17 December 2017 19: 56
        other
        Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
        This is bad?! I think no...

        It does well if you don’t need to develop your own industry, rely on investors (who can come, can they leave, will they share technologies? It’s unlikely), to believe in the untouchability of the eggplant. Do you know how to promote the Maidan? Ukrainian people's deputies were invited to the embassy, ​​foreign accounts were shown, they explained what would happen to them in the event of a force dispersal. How is our situation fundamentally different?
        1. 0
          17 December 2017 22: 33
          Quote: IvanIvanov
          How is our situation fundamentally different?

          Literally everyone.
    12. +2
      16 December 2017 20: 28
      "Gaidar steps ahead!" (from a pioneer song).
      I apologize to the authors. The song is made up for another reason .....
    13. +2
      16 December 2017 20: 38
      And what are you actually proposing to keep the international reserve? It is growing from year to year. And cooperation with dollar states is growing, how to pay with them?
    14. 0
      16 December 2017 21: 59
      I wrote in an article about the IOC’s decision that we it will do. I am shocked that I was right, and now think about why this is happening and .... it's even scary to think if this is so.
    15. +3
      16 December 2017 22: 49
      `` This is some tricky move by our government. '' They just want to pump up the US economy with our money until it bursts. Wise men ept.
    16. +1
      17 December 2017 15: 14
      Quote: Aristarkh Ludwigovich
      Asymmetric response

      In other words it's called am
  2. +2
    16 December 2017 16: 10
    Those. nothing has changed since August? And the headline is loud.
    1. +2
      16 December 2017 18: 07
      Quote: Muvka
      Those. nothing has changed since August? And the headline is loud.

      Let's say more. The volume of investments did not even return by May.
  3. +3
    16 December 2017 16: 11
    What is 6 trillions if the states have already spent 70. Our pay is apparently in order not to wake the beast. And for the sake of stability.
    1. +6
      16 December 2017 16: 29
      it’s not a matter of stability ... well, they will return the money to the Russian Federation and what's the point ???? ... how many new zarchenka with khoroshavins will immediately appear ???? ... because they steal-ssss, scum bastards ... system-ssss ... Myself, and gave birth to her ...
      1. 0
        16 December 2017 17: 15
        They steal !! But the main thing is that it’s not the oligarchs who steal, but the hard workers who steal everything that is valuable.
        Regarding Zakharchenko. Are you aware that the Old Believers were the richest in old Russia?
        On fake money. Think their money has evaporated? Maybe.
        1. Alf
          +11
          16 December 2017 18: 03
          Quote: p-k Oparyshev
          They steal !! But the main thing is that it’s not the oligarchs who steal, but the hard workers who steal everything that is valuable.

          Very true! Workers steal, and the oligarchs master. Feel the difference !
  4. +15
    16 December 2017 16: 11
    Large sum. And they finance the US budget deficit ... And why not the Russian?
    When will this liberalism end? wassat
    1. +15
      16 December 2017 16: 21
      under Putin never ...
      1. +4
        16 December 2017 16: 32
        Quote: kepmor
        under Putin never ...

        Will the dog end?
        1. +12
          16 December 2017 16: 44
          and that she’s already 17 years old the president of the Russian Federation ??? ... one berry field ... liberal ...
      2. +2
        16 December 2017 16: 58
        Your candidate This is not Putin. This is a system against which the president will not trample. He will not have enough strength.
        1. +1
          16 December 2017 17: 02
          Quote: private person
          Your candidate This is not Putin. This is a system against which the president will not trample. He will not have enough strength.

          The fact of the matter is that the system! And with the dog in general in the nineties we’ll return!
        2. +3
          16 December 2017 17: 59
          And the people will not help the President. Vladimir Ilyich correctly said: he got the crappy people!
      3. 0
        16 December 2017 17: 17
        Are you sure? And I'm not.
        1. +8
          16 December 2017 17: 56
          Quote: pp to Oparyshev
          Are you sure? And I'm not.

          That's what Sobchachkina’s mother says!
          1. +4
            16 December 2017 18: 06
            Yes, and this creature is still alive after such statements. That's certainly an apple from an apple tree is not far gone.
            1. +2
              16 December 2017 18: 12
              ABOUT! Let's introduce a new law that the family of an oligarch, without fail, must live a month at a living wage.
          2. -1
            16 December 2017 20: 42
            Well, if she is wrong, then explain to me that the Russians and not only were so scared of fifty Ingush? And where? In the very heart of Russia - Moscow? Here is respect for the Ingush. Well done shuganuli TNT so that I do not even know who there did not have time to apologize to them.
            1. 0
              17 December 2017 20: 04
              Inter-ethnic disagreements try to solder the throne the most I want. Although in many respects you are right in the Russian brotherhood only manifests itself when it is completely pressed.
          3. +2
            16 December 2017 21: 05
            Quote: volodya
            That's what Sobchachkina’s mother says!


            not much wrong

            +

            A statement was published on October 10

            I inform you that I, Lyudmila Borisovna Narusova, are not registered on TWITTER and other social networks! The only official source is my site (http://www.l-narusova.ru/) which contains my reliable comments and information about me, as well as the press service of the Federation Council (http://www.council.gov.ru /). All messages that appear on Twitter and other social networks on my behalf are FALSE!


            ======================
            Of course I am Narusev (Father - Boris Moiseevich Narusovich, after the war he changed his name to “Narusov”) I do not respect in any eye, like her daughter.
            However, I doubt that she could have been such an audience about Russians (the gut is thin, shy)
          4. 0
            17 December 2017 14: 33
            Quote: volodya
            That's what Sobchachkina’s mother says!

            Can I have a video with a quote after all? And then this same tact can be pasted on Putin’s photo and put here.
    2. +4
      16 December 2017 18: 42
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Large sum. And they finance the US budget deficit ... And why not the Russian? When will this liberalism end? wassat
      Only 10% of the volume that China has, but for some reason China is not soared about this. Well, here we will reset this asset, and so what? Will Liberastia End?
      1. 0
        16 December 2017 22: 19
        There are no sanctions against China.
  5. +15
    16 December 2017 16: 14
    This is not Russia — these are officials from the Ministry of Finance and the Central Bank, the people have nothing to do with the feeding of America — Russian people, no one just asks how people will need to manage their funds! So they feed and save the enemy’s economy at the expense of us!
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
  6. +1
    16 December 2017 16: 14
    China knows what it wants. But do we know?
    1. +4
      16 December 2017 16: 17
      Are we the power, or are we the people to whom this power supposedly should serve? ????
      1. +2
        16 December 2017 16: 23
        Do you know countries where power serves the people ?????
    2. +6
      16 December 2017 16: 19
      China cannot live without it, and where to put the surplus.
    3. 0
      16 December 2017 17: 18
      China has dirtied its Earth, Nature, for what? You don’t know, but I know.
  7. +7
    16 December 2017 16: 17
    Russia in October increased investment in the securities of the United States government from 103, 9 billion to 105 billion, follows from the data of the US Treasury.


    We climb into the mousetrap ourselves.
    1. +2
      16 December 2017 16: 35
      Quote: Going
      We climb into the mousetrap ourselves.

      Or Fork Cheese!
      1. +10
        16 December 2017 16: 50
        Quote: Tol100v
        Or Fork Cheese!

        and if default? or do we stubbornly support the striped economy?
        http://webdiscover.ru/v/22301
        1. +1
          16 December 2017 17: 19
          Not default is terrible, but the withdrawal of cash.
          1. +8
            16 December 2017 17: 45
            and what? are you taking cash? or take out cash?
            1. +6
              16 December 2017 17: 48
              It is not possible to seize, but there is such a risk to freeze.
              1. +9
                16 December 2017 17: 49
                Quote: Going
                It is not possible to seize, but there is such a risk to freeze.

                here I am about the same hi
            2. +1
              16 December 2017 18: 01
              Not the main thing, but whatever your cash is taken from you. With electronic money, you will depend on the presence of current in the outlet.
              1. +8
                16 December 2017 18: 16
                Quote: p-k Oparyshev
                you will depend on the presence of current in the outlet.

                so can we build the Vostochny electric wire - what would it be without problems?
  8. +24
    16 December 2017 16: 17
    To invest in securities with a yield of 2,5% maximum and sell your securities with a yield of 7,5% .... it’s kind of .... but, as the GDP said at a “press conference”: he has no questions for the CBR "..... winked

    PS: https://publizist.ru/blogs/6/20708/- what
    1. +5
      16 December 2017 16: 37
      so to "their" what may be questions ...
    2. +6
      16 December 2017 17: 39
      Quote: Monster_Fat
      To invest in securities with a yield of 2,5% maximum and sell your securities with a yield of 7,5% .... it’s kind of .... but, as the GDP said at a “press conference”: he has no questions for the CBR "..... winked

      PS: https://publizist.ru/blogs/6/20708/- what

      He and the government have no questions. He has long been living in his world and he is doing well.
  9. +6
    16 December 2017 16: 20
    it is necessary to legally ban the financing of the American economy by state funds, do we have nowhere to invest $ 105 billion domestically?
    at least a third could buy new production from scratch abroad where we are lagging behind and which the country needs for development, the infrastructure in the regions is in many ways very old and pours
    1. +6
      16 December 2017 18: 49
      Quote: Graz
      it is necessary to legally ban the financing of the American economy by state funds, do we have nowhere to invest $ 105 billion domestically?


      Namely, because our laws and the Constitution were written by amers in the 90s. And in addition, Russia is a member of the IMF, so without investment in green papers we can’t do it, and it’s legislatively.
  10. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. The comment was deleted.
  14. +5
    16 December 2017 16: 32
    They paid tribute - sleep peacefully ...
  15. +19
    16 December 2017 16: 33
    105 Gigabaks - tribute to the victor in the ХV from the defeated ... Laws of war are inexorable.
    With this money, the USA can create its own super-weapon or a new ISIS, equip Ukrainian death battalions, finance the fifth convoy in the Russian Federation, and if necessary, make a coup, etc.
    As Russophobe Brzezinski croaked - "A new world order is being created against Russia, at the expense of Russia and on the wreckage of Russia "...
    See at the root, dear.
    Sovereignty. Russia. Putin
    1. +10
      16 December 2017 17: 10
      Sovereignty! .Russia! ... third-superfluous
      1. 0
        16 December 2017 21: 02
        The communist flag is superfluous here, and Putin is the third and necessary
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. 0
          17 December 2017 05: 23
          Well, many years of brainwashing is paying off sad
          1. 0
            17 December 2017 09: 18
            Also a citizen of a long-gone country? If only you could be sent back to the time machine, we would live there happily.
  16. +4
    16 December 2017 16: 35
    Well, actually, if you think about it like that, there is still a reason for this, namely, during the sanctions. The fact is that for foreign trade it is necessary to reserve a collateral loan in the right western bank, and in view of sanctions, Russian loans do not give, so you have to go a different way — use consumable securities already bought as collateral — of course, this is some loss in value but still better “than nothing” when you really need to buy something very necessary.
    1. 0
      16 December 2017 22: 34
      Sorry))) write nonsense.
      if loans still do not give, so what kind of collateral are we talking about?
      this is trasheris - the yield is minimal, no 2-3% per year ... it doesn’t smell there.
      the Fed rate is so much 1,25% per annum ... so I'm afraid that our financiers - bald, gubastenky and Madame Nabiullina still pay a little more ... for placing Russian money in American treasury. I think there is a yield of 0% per annum +/- some hundredths ... and 8 times out of 10 is a minus, not a plus.
      1. 0
        17 December 2017 00: 52
        "I write nonsense" say .... about the yield of the Treasuries? And here is https://ru.investing.com/rates-bonds/usa-governme
        nt-bonds if you look? wink Well, you need to read a little more about how a large-scale international trade transaction is carried out (this is not an ordinary bank transfer to you like on AliExpress). There is no way to do without a secured loan. Bonds of the US Treasury are highly liquid banking assets and therefore, they can be used as collateral in a trade transaction.
        1. 0
          17 December 2017 06: 32
          He looked and made sure that we were talking about the same thing. Only I'm talking about the beginning / top of this chart / table, and why are you talking about the end / bottom.
          But I am convinced that the Russian financial "gubanchiki":
          1. do not buy "long" securities
          2. they have an agent (s) for the sale of these securities, who get the bulk of the already small income, as a reward for overwork.
          so there is 0% or a slight minus - if you count honestly and directly.

          but 'up' they report something about income, estessna.
          but about the fact that agents / placement assistants ride like cheese in butter - they are modestly silent.
          this is always the case in Russia, with state money and with those who get it to “steer”
  17. +12
    16 December 2017 16: 38
    Quote: Aristarkh Ludwigovich
    This is some tricky move of our government. Asymmetric response

    It’s just a colonial economy, the metropolis sucks from the colony, and our (or rather, not ours) Central Bank, led by a Yale graduate and an assistant from Sberbank, serves it. Therefore, the question of developing our own economy and means of production is not relevant, this is not allowed for the colony.
  18. +9
    16 December 2017 16: 40
    In August, Russian investments in US government bonds amounted to 105,4 billion dollars, in September this amount fell to 103,9 billion dollars, but in October this figure reached 105 billion dollars

    Nothing ...
    “From August to September, blah blah blah was one percent less. And from September to December, it was one percent more.
    In December, blah blah blah was the same as in August. "
    By the way, the most important pests are in the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China - you see how many Amer’s little papers we bought !!!
    To the wall of all, definitely laughing
  19. +6
    16 December 2017 16: 47
    105 yards of evergreen is approximately 6,3 tril. shame on the wooden. The budget of the Russian girl for 18 years (revenue) is 16,5 trillion. of the same tree (the stability of which we believe every year) ... With a budget duofsit of 1,7 tril tree (forecasts) ... Maybe a no-plus budget is better to do? What do you think?
    Or is it such a tricky move by the government - we’ll depreciate the ruble once again by two and that’s all - we have a second budget in reserve ... And let niggas be niggas - there’s nothing to get used to ....
  20. +6
    16 December 2017 17: 04
    We need to call the president, he is them !!! The boyar of these ... Oh, it’s a pity the line will not be soon ...
    1. +1
      16 December 2017 22: 00
      The best comment !!! APPLODING STANDING hi
  21. +5
    16 December 2017 17: 10
    This is all you need to know:
    The US budget deficit is paid by other countries, using the dollar as an international currency. This opinion was expressed by Deputy Prime Minister Arkady Dvorkovich, speaking at an international forum in Yalta. Therefore, the world's most expensive product is not gas, not oil - this is the US budget deficit.
    - The whole world needs the economic development of this country, it is necessary that the American economy remains strong, and we pay for it. We pay a high price, said Dvorkovich.
    1. +5
      16 December 2017 19: 21
      went under the buck in the 90s specifically (thanks to the fuck bought by the Jewish financial elite of the USA). They sold a considerable part of the economic strategic systems, right up to the energy sector (thanks to the redhead Chubais) - that's why you have to maneuver in the global financial markets, this is not the USSR with a self-sufficient internal economy, although because of this there were difficulties with the new technologies of the world, they tried to keep up, went their own way, and all financial speculations, in the good sense of the word, were under state control ...
  22. +3
    16 December 2017 17: 28
    Or am I ... k, or do not ski the skis ??? I can’t understand anything in the actions of our Central Bank. We are generally who and where ???
    1. +1
      16 December 2017 18: 03
      As long as there is cash, you can not bathe, but when instead of it will be a card comes quickly.
    2. +1
      16 December 2017 19: 34
      So what is not clear here? The Central Bank is a foreign company that invests where it is more profitable for it. This is not a Russian bank, at least a commercial one, and not to mention the state one.
  23. +5
    16 December 2017 17: 57
    "Wherever you throw, everywhere a wedge." The global political and financial situation drives the monetary authorities of different countries into only one instrument - US Treasury bonds. sad sad sad


  24. +4
    16 December 2017 18: 06
    Few. All possible money must be invested in American bonds, then it is certain that the Russian economy will grow. You look and the sanctions will be canceled.
  25. +2
    16 December 2017 18: 08
    The mind does not understand Russia .....
    1. +1
      16 December 2017 21: 01
      Just the same, everything is clear, I’m glad that normal people were found in the Russian government since investments are now growing
  26. +3
    16 December 2017 18: 15
    What securities can be called valuable from the state with twenty trillion debt!? fool negative
    1. +2
      16 December 2017 20: 33
      Those that are provided with assets: land, enterprises, technology.
      1. +2
        16 December 2017 20: 38
        “Those that are provided with assets: land, enterprises, technology.” - the Yankees do not provide their “securities” with this good. The guarantee is the word of the gentleman. laughing
        1. +1
          16 December 2017 20: 53
          Quote: pepel
          The guarantee is the word of the gentleman.

          You do not confuse securities with dollars? Oh yes, in your training manual there are no such details.
          1. 0
            17 December 2017 12: 00
            In my training manual it is written that our government invests in debt obligations of the US government, and not in FR banknotes.
            1. 0
              17 December 2017 17: 16
              Quote: pepel
              invested in debt obligations of the US government, and not in FR banknotes.

              How do you imagine "investing in banknotes FR"?
              Vashcheta, school course - the device, functioning and control of the state monetary system. Current do not study?
  27. +10
    16 December 2017 18: 21
    A bike, or maybe not. The US President is told: "Russia has increased investment in US securities by another two billion dollars." President: "We give them eternal sanctions, and they give us endless money! My mind cannot understand Russia ..."
  28. +1
    16 December 2017 18: 23
    Particularly pleased in the era of sanctions. As so, the betcoins should have blinked there too.
  29. 0
    16 December 2017 18: 37
    it smells very bad, domestic financiers once again increase financing for the economy of a potential adversary ... or again, to ensure payment of external current interest on debts?
  30. +7
    16 December 2017 18: 40
    It’s funny to read news such as:
    The development of the new generation combat railway complex Barguzin was not included in the new state armament program for 2018-2027 due to lack of funding, Kommersant writes.
    and here at once
    Russia in October increased investment in the securities of the United States government from 103, 9 billion to 105 billion, follows from the data of the US Treasury.
  31. +4
    16 December 2017 18: 40
    URRRRAAAAAAA ..... last year we set a record and we won’t fail this year, and then we’re obscene ............. at least someone in 15 years of stupid press conferences took an interest in something important
  32. +4
    16 December 2017 18: 43
    "Russia must pay for the US financial stability."
    Graduate of Duke University (North Carolina, USA) with a master's degree in economics. Deputy Prime Minister A. Dvorkovich.
    Russia has paid tax and may continue to receive sanctions.
  33. +1
    16 December 2017 18: 47
    Nabiulina decided to again test false patriots on VO laughing
  34. +6
    16 December 2017 19: 03
    After the death of Zadornov, it seems that his famous slogan is already about the "Russians."
    Well, with the Irish, this is an offering for offshore tax rates, for China, it's a payment for access to the US market.
    Why is this for Russia? ... Probably only a comprehensive mustache of Peskov will explain. wink ...
    1. 0
      16 December 2017 21: 00
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nDW7KbTY6Qs
      1. 0
        16 December 2017 21: 18
        Quote: drunkram
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nDW7KbTY6Qs

        I always try to respect the opinions of others. But, in my opinion, Mr. "Neretin" made 5-6 wrong judgments. The arguments of the author of the article or the comments of Monster Fat are two more convincing than the proposed video.
  35. +2
    16 December 2017 19: 11
    Well, the Americans will soon learn the magnitude of Russian investments with the confiscation of capital stolen in Russia. On the one hand, some thieves invest from others confiscate. Bravo. What does Trump know how to do business. Then it confiscates these capitals. The reason will be.
  36. +2
    16 December 2017 19: 29
    It’s not fate to invest in your economy, they’ve become insolent! They can’t take the debt from Ukraine, but they definitely won’t give the money back, they say they’ll wipe themselves with “valuable” papers. But the Americans are developing their country and collect dividends from the rest. Super! Build up their influence around the world, deploy bases. What will prevent them from imposing sanctions on all our papers?
    1. +1
      16 December 2017 20: 12
      Buying securities is a deterrent. Just think about what happens if, for example, Russia, in retaliation for sanctions, puts up for sale these securities in large quantities. I am not an economist, but I think there will be nothing good for the American economy. And China has so many of these securities, which is why the Americans cannot do anything to them.
      1. 0
        17 December 2017 08: 53
        Well put up for sale, so what? They will buy / not buy. Suppose they buy, the owner has changed. What is the threat then?
  37. +3
    16 December 2017 20: 03
    Russia increased investment in US securities

    Keep it up! Give import substitution and independence!
  38. +4
    16 December 2017 20: 15
    Why not get rid of these US securities for circulation, and don’t invest the proceeds in our development of production, education and medicine?
  39. The comment was deleted.
  40. +4
    16 December 2017 21: 35
    Quote: Herkulesich
    For such a tricky move, one biblical character cut down thirty, as you remember. ...

    And 22 pluses
    Quote: g1v2
    Also, financiers like to invest in treasury, because they are easy to sell and you can speculate on their course, especially if there is any kind of insider.
    The Chinese in Treasury hold the most money and no one blames them for this. Are the Chinese stupid according to our "experts"?

    “Experts” are not stupid, they screamed “sold everything”, “cut down the thirty” and the like on this site like to speculate and earn pluses.
    The foolish lesson, of course, showing only the magnitude of egomania.
  41. +1
    16 December 2017 22: 48
    Delyagin recalled (from an interview a year ago, when they bought 10 billion)
    “However, complete liquidity and an actual guarantee against falling value of securities make Treasury attractive as a means of saving money, a safe haven for capital loosers around the world. The global crisis is growing, instability is growing and zones of bloody chaos are expanding (including carried out by the USA to finance its development with frightened capitals of the whole world) increase the demand for them and, accordingly, reduce their profitability.
    Investments in treasury are carried out by both the Ministry of Finance and the Bank of Russia. Ministry of Finance, reducing the Reserve Fund. The Bank of Russia sells treasuries while reducing its gold and foreign exchange reserves and buys when they increase. Therefore, the growth of investments is caused by the activities of the Bank of Russia, and not the Ministry of Finance.
    according to the internationally recognized “Reddy criterion”, international reserves equal to the sum of quarterly imports and annual payments on foreign debt are sufficient to ensure the stability of the national currency (and, in an open economy, without restricting speculation). All the time the ruble devalued, from January 2014, international reserves exceeded the level required by the Reddy criterion by 1,5-2 times, that is, they were excessive, and the devaluation was completely man-made.
    At the beginning of 2016, Reddy’s criterion for Russia was $ 165,3 billion, and our international reserves were $ 368 billion .. Now they are above $ 379 billion! That is, 200 billion dollars, right now in the pockets of the state, can be used to develop the country without any risk of a weakening ruble. But the Government of the Russian Federation prefers to support countries that are waging a Cold War against Russia with this money. As I recall, Dvorkovich said, “Russia must pay for the financial stability of the United States,” and this maxim is strictly executed.
    - Another weighty argument of liberal economists - China, Japan, the UK are heavily invested in treasury! Is Russia worse?
    - Their economies are rebuilt, they invest extra money in the US debt securities that are not used.
    China, Japan are investing too much, and we are tearing the last from us, something that we ourselves are sorely lacking.
    Our economy is monstrously underinvested, it is suffocating without money, desperately needs them. "
    1. 0
      17 December 2017 17: 21
      Quote: Antares
      Our economy is monstrously underinvested, it is suffocating without money, desperately needs them. "

      And you like that, without any reason, believe in it?
      "No, well, hamsters are hawking" (c) - Do you consider yourself a hamster (office plankton and other names of low-skilled clerks)?
  42. +3
    16 December 2017 23: 46
    What a blessing that local commentators are not in the government.
    With respect to the pseudo-experts and underpatriots squared! hi

    ps Well, what are you predictable and simple, well, you can’t.
    The head is needed not only to eat it.
    1. +2
      17 December 2017 00: 08
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&
      ; v = UAo8QXkh97Y
  43. 0
    17 December 2017 00: 10
    Our people are strange, who still believes information from the United States. 100% sure that this is the imagination of the US Treasury. They want to destabilize the situation in Russia before the election
  44. +1
    17 December 2017 06: 25
    Nobody even mentioned Kudrin, strange even.
    Personally, I would update the machine park, I don’t know the truth, I’m not a financier at all. And these would have responded with a couple of percent of income with interest. In my opinion it is better than looking at the scoreboard with numbers and thinking - I'm rich. request
    1. 0
      17 December 2017 17: 23
      Quote: Fedorov
      Personally, I would update the machine park,

      So, before this pertuberization, the entire machine park was updated - and cut. AND?
  45. +1
    17 December 2017 12: 44
    Quote: Herkulesich
    For such a tricky move, one biblical character cut down thirty, as you remember. ...

    Dear Americans, there is no more money, but you hold on ... As soon as we cut the next billions from Russia, we will immediately send it.
    With fiery greetings, your agents in Russia ...
    The guarantor of the local Constitution and a group of its effective managers.
  46. +2
    17 December 2017 13: 35
    Why isn’t it right to invest in my business - but instead of me, e ... t tax? It’s clear why. Better money allocated by the Central Bank supposedly for lending to the real sector, cranked up on currency speculation or invest in the enemy’s economy .... As long as the scum of the accountant-liberals is in power, nothing will change. It is impossible to boost the economy by dealing only with securities.
  47. +1
    17 December 2017 14: 13
    They squeezed out the real estate from us, we looted them, new sanctions we again looted - reminiscent of such a teenage racket the more you pay off the more you swear.
  48. +1
    17 December 2017 14: 24
    They adopt a law banning trade and the circulation of our securities, new sanctions, and our Central Bank throws money into their papers and economy, subsidizing an increasing military budget, wars, and losses from sanctions against us, and immediately declaring inside the country that there is no money, but you hold on. Is it generally, whose government and the Central Bank, or a graduate of the Yale school work out preferences for the owner? When our servants of the people and the people elected wake up, stop picking up the last pennies from children and the elderly from their pockets, and finally take up their country and Homeland. Maybe it is time to stop the robbery of our long-suffering country, which the whole history of mankind did not know yet, maybe it is time to already take up our own home?
  49. 0
    17 December 2017 23: 18
    ????? belay ?????

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"