President of the oligarchs?

22
Russian President Vladimir Putin held another big press conference. The general impression is that Putin felt confident in matters of Russia's international security. First of all, because there is a specific result in Syria.

However, questions relating to domestic socio-economic problems were left without concrete answers.

For example, journalists offered to take over the control and monitoring of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, which, as many believe, serves the interests of the Western world. After all, while the Bank of Russia and all our reserves are in the hands of our geopolitical adversary, Russia will not be independent.

Colonel-General, President of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems Leonid Ivashov believes that the modern Russian government, the structure of which originates in the 90-ies, is unable to work for the benefit of the ordinary Russian.

    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    22 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +2
      16 December 2017 10: 42
      Those who advise to take control of the Central Bank do not risk their lives. Because of such a step, they may well shoot like Kennedy. This is serious.
      1. +1
        16 December 2017 11: 10
        And what do you suggest?
        1. 0
          16 December 2017 11: 24
          It is possible to propose it when you are not risking anything. England, as the Head of the World lives without a Constitution, so we can cancel the constitution following the example of Britain and Harosha to suffer from state ravings.
          Otherwise, I support the Russian Policy on gold and currencies. Kosyak has no such policy. It is quite possible to trust.
          If only they hadn’t canceled the cash, then the kapets will not poke the kitten anymore.
        2. +3
          16 December 2017 11: 27
          No need to drive horses. Talking that Putin has leaked everyone to the West has long looked silly, another thing is that he is not inclined to act hastily, as many would like. Separate from the West by the new Iron Curtain? And then what? Are you sure it will be better?
          Yes, and constant cries about the oligarchs ... Yes, they are still those "radishes" - this is a fact. But let’s subtract and divide everything - it was already there and the result was not what we wanted. Life without the oligarchs? Fantasy.
          A simple question - people sincerely are outraged when the son of a big cone evades responsibility thanks to daddy, but which of these indignant under the same conditions would not have done everything possible to save his son from prison if he was at least a hundred times to blame?
          1. +4
            16 December 2017 11: 47
            We can assume anything, but the fact is that Vladimir Putin made a career in the KGB under the leadership of Andropov, the most state body that did not defend the state of the SOVIET UNION, but was * under the Council of Ministers *. A lot of strange things were attributed to Andropov himself, and to his nominees and outspoken proteges, one can recall Yeltsin, Gorbachev, Kalugin, and many others, and B PUTIN served under him and then headed this service. Do you think that by chance the Ministry of Internal Affairs suddenly turned out to be controlled by the KGB? And an accident suddenly appeared fraternities with weapons and connections in the administrations and the * security forces *?
            So there is nothing surprising either in the constitution, in the central bank, or in many other things. There is nothing surprising in such a carefully guarded nationalist frenzy of all sorts of different nationalists living in RUSSIA and daring to bark at the RUSSIAN PEOPLE.
            1. +3
              16 December 2017 14: 24
              Quote: Vasily50
              In B Putin made a career in the KGB under the leadership of Andropov

              I know, but hardly everyone who served in the KGB was traitors. GDP was not in those ranks in order to have any influence on what was happening then, and then it simply survived in the collapse that was happening then, working for Sobchak.
              1. +6
                16 December 2017 15: 28
                Quote: Dart2027
                and then he simply survived the collapse that was taking place then, working for Sobchak.

                Why so modest? They would write that Putin simply violating the oath, betrayed the country, which he swore, and went over to the camp of those who destroyed the country. I am wrong?
                1. +1
                  16 December 2017 15: 33
                  Quote: Giants
                  They would write that Putin simply violating the oath, betrayed the country, which he swore

                  Please - show on the map the country which he swore. And at the same time list your merits in the struggle for its preservation.
                  1. +6
                    16 December 2017 15: 53
                    Quote: Dart2027
                    the country which he swore

                    The country is no longer there, but there is a beautiful monument to one of those who killed her: EBN Center. It was opened by Putin. One of Putin's very first decrees brought the entire Ebnov family out of law, making them unchallenged. And in '91 I was too young to have merit in the struggle to preserve the USSR. May I ask about your merits?
                    1. 0
                      16 December 2017 16: 05
                      Quote: Giants
                      There is no country
                      So how could he break the oath?
                      Quote: Giants
                      One of Putin's very first decrees brought the entire Ebnov family out of law
                      But did you have to start a civil war, in addition to all the problems?
                      Quote: Giants
                      And in '91 I was too young
                      I also studied at school. But unlike you, he never blamed everyone who lived then that they had been deceived.
    2. +6
      16 December 2017 11: 16
      Quote: pp to Oparyshev
      Those who advise to take control of the Central Bank do not risk their lives. Because of such a step, they may well shoot like Kennedy. This is serious.

      How serious! To begin with, it is necessary to decide on the Constitution by referendum, remove an article on the insubordination of the Central Bank to the state, and then ... But you can’t find courageous politicians ... And all that revolves in the blue eye is myakina !!!
      1. +8
        16 December 2017 13: 31
        Quote: Evrodav
        To start with the Constitution, it is necessary to decide by referendum, to remove the article on the insubordination of the Central Bank to the state

        The Central Bank is subordinate to the State. According to the Central Bank Law, by the way.
    3. +2
      16 December 2017 13: 16
      Smart man laid out all thoughts on the shelves. I fully support the conclusions.
    4. +2
      16 December 2017 15: 18
      Quote: Dart2027
      No need to drive horses. Talking that Putin has leaked everyone to the West has long looked silly, another thing is that he is not inclined to act hastily, as many would like. Separate from the West by the new Iron Curtain? And then what? Are you sure it will be better?
      Yes, and constant cries about the oligarchs ... Yes, they are still those "radishes" - this is a fact. But let’s subtract and divide everything - it was already there and the result was not what we wanted. Life without the oligarchs? Fantasy.
      A simple question - people sincerely are outraged when the son of a big cone evades responsibility thanks to daddy, but which of these indignant under the same conditions would not have done everything possible to save his son from prison if he was at least a hundred times to blame?

      No iron curtain is needed. You just need to remove all the traitors from everywhere in Russia, Russian Orthodox.
      A simple question - people sincerely are outraged when the son of a big cone evades responsibility thanks to daddy, but which of these indignant under the same conditions would not have done everything possible to save his son from prison if he was at least a hundred times to blame?

      The simple answer is any good and normal person. Even I. I don’t need a son a thug and a thief. And firstly, I wouldn’t raise my son like that! And MY son wouldn’t do that!
      1. 0
        16 December 2017 15: 27
        Quote: Belarus is Russia
        You just need to remove all the traitors from everywhere in Russia

        Sounds good. Here are just a little more complicated.
        Quote: Belarus is Russia
        The simple answer is any good and normal person.

        In theory, yes, but in life, people tend to protect their children, not someone else's. There are exceptions, but exactly exceptions. And so in everything, alas.
        1. +3
          16 December 2017 22: 37
          DART Well, why do you immediately stigmatize opponents. by that. that they want to "select and share everything"? Need a progressive tax and all. My many relatives. uncles and aunt were killed in the war not to fatten a bunch of close ones or maybe the oligarchs fought off the enemies? If they all run to London. then we will not grieve. and factories. they will not take factories and oil and gas fields with them.
          1. 0
            16 December 2017 23: 36
            Quote: Cossack 471
            If they all run to London. then we will not grieve. and factories. factories and
            They will not be taken. There is only such a thing as history, and if we recall its lessons, then any human society consists of different layers. An exception may be a handful of 5-10 people. And those who get upstairs are cynical and cruel people, simply because in order to be upstairs you need to remove all competitors, otherwise they will remove you yourself. But if you remove this layer, it will only get worse, because a fight will begin for warm places, until everything returns to normal. It sounds ugly, but any attempt to ignore this rule ends in nothing good. Why did not one of the elites of that time begin to fight to save the USSR? Yes, because in it they did not have the opportunity to become official oligarchs, and it doesn’t matter what ordinary citizens were dying for - party bonuses wanted just that. It is often said now that we do not have a patriotic elite - it has not been around for 60 years, at least, since the attempt to create a truly Soviet elite failed miserably, and the old one was killed or kicked out.
            Quote: Cossack 471
            DART Well, why do you immediately stigmatize opponents. by that. that they want to "select and share everything"

            But do not they want this? In fact, when it comes to talking about the oligarchs, one way or another it all comes down to the fact that they stole the people's good and Putin is obliged to return it. That is, not to divide literally, but in any case to take action. From the point of view of ordinary morality, this is indeed so, but from the point of view of building a state this will not end in anything good.
    5. 0
      17 December 2017 18: 41
      Quote: Dart2027

      Quote: Belarus is Russia
      The simple answer is any good and normal person.

      In theory, yes, but in life, people tend to protect their children, not someone else's. There are exceptions, but exactly exceptions. And so in everything, alas.
      No Not always. No one needs a killer, a thief, a robber and a maniac.
      1. 0
        17 December 2017 20: 22
        Quote: Belarus is Russia
        No not always.

        Not always, but in most cases. Protecting your offspring is one of the cornerstones of biology.
    6. 0
      23 December 2017 12: 07
      Quote: Dart2027
      Quote: Belarus is Russia
      No not always.

      Not always, but in most cases. Protecting your offspring is one of the cornerstones of biology.

      A murderer, a rapist, a maniac and a thief is no longer offspring, it is a dangerous recidivist who can kill parents too. He is no longer a man. Yes, of course, it’s a pity. But with such a person it’s dangerous to be everyone. Parents, including.
    7. 0
      8 January 2018 21: 39
      Whatever the GDP is doing now, its train leaves forever.
      It is important for Russia that there be a team of like-minded people, so that a new leader appears.
      And all these oligarchs, and other capitalist pranks will go into the analities of history - history itself, time will not leave them a place long enough and long for the existing model.
      Sorry, but they are already a story - which clings to 17 years of rule!
    8. 0
      23 January 2018 19: 24
      Quote: Don Analyst
      Whatever the GDP is doing now, its train leaves forever.
      It is important for Russia that there be a team of like-minded people, so that a new leader appears.
      And all these oligarchs, and other capitalist pranks will go into the analities of history - history itself, time will not leave them a place long enough and long for the existing model.
      Sorry, but they are already a story - which clings to 17 years of rule!

      Or Putin, or Zhirinosvsky then, instead of Putin. If Putin does not suit you.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"