Russian Su-35 vs American F-22. Infographics

Affiliation of the American F-22 fighter to the fifth generation does not guarantee him victory in the air over the Russian Su-35. For a comparison of tactical, technical and combat characteristics of the main fighters of Russia and the United States, see infographics.

Comments

[Same lech]

Well went to the fan ....
F-22 aircraft breakthrough enemy air defense ..
SU-35 aircraft gaining air superiority ...
different tasks and goals ... different approach to the fulfillment of a combat mission ... different tactics of battle.
I doubt that there will be large-scale battles between these two different planes.

[Lock36]

Quote: The same LYOKHA

F-22 aircraft breakthrough enemy air defense ..
SU-35 aircraft gaining air superiority ...

Very interesting. And who now ensures the achievement of air superiority among amers?

[inkass_98]

It would be better with the F-15SE Silent Eagle compared. Much closer to the tasks of the machine.

[tchoni]

I looked and immediately remembered a joke about the competition of two presidents: ours and the American. American won. The next day, the headlines in the newspapers: in the American "our president took first place, Russian last." In our "American president took the last place! Our president is in an honorable second place!"
So here: we take and compare the instrumental range of our radar (for the “bomber” class target) with the range for the real target (epr 1 μV - conditionally) If we take the instrumental range, the American has a little more than 500 km.
Also, the authors modestly remain silent that the f22 radar can accompany a hundred targets - well, ours won’t look at this background, it won’t., And if we mention that the American is capable of producing 30 targets - that’s all.
Moreover, the fact that the f22 radar has a modest mode of operation using noise-like signals in which the operation of the radio is not fixed by our p and rtr means has eluded the great and wise authors.
Well, the last su 35 has an undeniable advantage in close maneuverable combat .. Well, maybe so, the raptor does not have an OLS station, but there is a reduced IR visibility and ovt, so the question of the unconditional advantage of su35 in close combat can be considered very controversial

[Lock36]

Quote: tchoni

the f22 radar has a modest mode of operation using noise-like signals in which the operation of the radio is not recorded by our p and rtr means.

Please give proof on this wonderful info. ShPS does not detect our RTR? Yeah .. well .. yes ...

[tchoni]

Quote: Lock36

Please give proof on this wonderful info. ShPS does not detect our RTR? Yeah .. well .. yes ...

We have two types of STR “pastel” and “birch” standing on airplanes; not one of them does not record stations working with a noise-like signal. At least I did not find information about this in the open press. If you can prove the opposite with an indication of the stations and bands, I will be grateful.

[Lock36]

Hello! So not a single station or a single station on airplanes?
With all due respect, aircraft stations are still not radio-technical intelligence.
RTR are separate divisions and with corresponding stations, for example, in air defense.

[m.cempbell]

30 goals American is able to produce - and in general.

Explain to the ignorant HOW? How can one shell 30 targets at a time with 8 missiles, HOW? From a gun chtol? He pressed the trigger and the shells fanned out like a fan?

[tchoni]

Quote: m.cempbell

Explain to the ignorant HOW? How can one shell 30 targets at a time, with 8 missiles, HOW? From a gun chtol?

Indeed, there is a jamb. not 30, but 20 missiles, leads.
8 of their own and 12 more from f35, who, taking advantage of their low visibility, came up to you for a pistol shot))) Read, they have already worked out this scheme in exercises.

[Graz]

post some garbage and not ashamed of you