Military Review

US Navy abandoned the idea to return to the system of "canned"

35
The US Navy abandoned the idea of ​​returning the Oliver Hazard Perry-launched frigates of the type to the reserve, reports Независимая газета with reference resource USNI News.


Frigate type Oliver Hazard Perry

"The idea of ​​returning to service conserved (on navy such ships are called "canned goods") frigates arose in the light of the promises of President Donald Trump to increase the fleet from 275 to 355 ships. It was assumed that the frigates would be sent to carry out missions in the coastal zone, thus freeing more modern ships from these tasks, ”the material says.

However, the cost of returning to operation only one frigate was estimated at hundreds of millions of dollars. Too high cost of work put an end to the plans of resuscitation of frigates.

The resource specifies that the ships of the type "Oliver Hazard Perry" are designed as "an ocean escort ship capable of providing anti-submarine and anti-aircraft defense of transport convoys, amphibious formations and anti-submarine groups."

It is reported that from 1975-th to 2004 year was built 71 frigate of this type. The last of them was put into reserve in the 2015 year. The United States transfers and sells decommissioned ships to allied countries.

The newspaper reminds that in 1980's the Americans carried out modernization of 4's Iowa type battleships, which were built during World War II. At the same time, each of them, after upgrading, had Tomahawk cruise missiles onboard the 32, as well as modern artillery, torpedo, and other weapons.
Photos used:
https://ru.wikipedia.org
35 comments
Ad

Our projects are looking for authors in the news and analytical departments. Requirements for applicants: literacy, responsibility, efficiency, inexhaustible creative energy, experience in copywriting or journalism, the ability to quickly analyze text and check facts, write concisely and interestingly on political and economic topics. The work is paid. Contact: [email protected]

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Frol 7525
    Frol 7525 14 December 2017 15: 15 New
    +8
    And rightly so. If there is nowhere to put new ones (I envy them in a good way), why are old ones, They have already outlived their age, let them rest in Peace ...
    1. siberalt
      siberalt 14 December 2017 15: 16 New
      +3
      Could these "canned" ferment Ukraine, and now there’s nothing to take from them. lol
      1. Going
        Going 14 December 2017 15: 32 New
        +8
        But they can do so, only sell - for land.
        1. novel66
          novel66 14 December 2017 16: 02 New
          +4
          so they need Crimea, but we won’t give up
          1. Going
            Going 14 December 2017 16: 15 New
            +5
            Crimea is not Ukraine, they cannot see it as their own ears, and land is the only thing that remains valuable in Ukraine.
            1. Mih1974
              Mih1974 18 December 2017 16: 22 New
              +1
              Well, "look at your ears" - we can arrange them laughing , chop off - and sweaty legs give "let them admire." good bully
      2. Alexey RA
        Alexey RA 14 December 2017 15: 55 New
        +2
        Quote: siberalt
        Could these "canned" ferment Ukraine, and now there’s nothing to take from them. lol

        So it seems that in 2008, at Pasechnik, the United States wanted to transfer several ships from the reserve to the Navy.
        Ukraine and the United States are studying the possibility of transferring American warships to the Ukrainian naval forces of the Ukrainian armed forces, said US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates on Wednesday after meeting with Ukrainian Defense Minister Yuri Yekhanurov.

        But, apparently, then they decided not to ruin Ukraine. smile
        1. siberalt
          siberalt 14 December 2017 15: 57 New
          0
          In 2008, the Americans opened their mouths to the Crimea. Yes bummer came out. Now a completely different situevina.
      3. Kurare
        Kurare 14 December 2017 16: 11 New
        +2
        Quote: siberalt
        Could these "canned" ferment Ukraine ...

        And the team also from the USA can be provided as canned goods, since “their own raguli” by their constant jumping, do not let Gd drown the pelvis. wassat
        1. Alexey RA
          Alexey RA 14 December 2017 18: 46 New
          +3
          Quote: Kurare
          And the team also from the USA can be provided as canned goods, since “their own raguli” by their constant jumping, do not let Gd drown the pelvis.

          Except for jokes - Have you seen the insides of “Saigak Dachny”? It seems that this is not the flagship of the fleet, but the ship has just been taken out of sludge, where it stood for about 5 years.
          The funniest thing was to read the claims of the Navy, that the whole thing is that they slipped the junk, and Russia, they say. took the newest swimmer for herself. Given that the Saigak was the last of the completed Soviet ships of the 1135 family. The next 1135s were already built by Russia (for Indians and for themselves).
          1. Kurare
            Kurare 14 December 2017 22: 08 New
            +2
            Quote: Alexey RA
            Have you seen the insides of Saigak Dachny?

            No, I haven’t seen it, but I believe it with pleasure. Therefore, I wrote a post. The ruin now does not need iron, but normal people. But on Sagaidachny set a new kitchen! wassat
    2. Usher
      Usher 14 December 2017 17: 28 New
      0
      Have you read the article? They are short of ships.
  2. Loess
    Loess 14 December 2017 15: 17 New
    +3
    increase the fleet from 275 to 355 ships.
    Why do they need so much? Who scared them again?
    1. Captain Pushkin
      Captain Pushkin 14 December 2017 21: 12 New
      +2
      Quote: Less
      Less Today, 15:17 New
      increase the fleet from 275 to 355 ships.
      Why do they need so much? Who scared them again?

      Over the past few months there have been at least two attacks on US destroyers of the 7th fleet - the enemy both times went into rams, valiant sailors died, ships were put out for lengthy repairs. Can someone guarantee that this does not happen again? To do this, create a stock of approximately 80 ships (8 attacks per year and 10 years for repair). And so it turns out 275 (in formation) +80 = 355
  3. Alexey RA
    Alexey RA 14 December 2017 15: 25 New
    +2
    It was assumed that the frigates would be sent to carry out missions in the coastal zone, thus freeing more modern ships from these tasks

    Yes, yes, yes ... let's withdraw to the reserve UCP and replace them with expensive littoral ships. And then we will re-open the UCP and direct them to carry out part of the tasks of the littoral. smile
    Good change! Cool changed! ©
  4. Altona
    Altona 14 December 2017 15: 35 New
    +4
    Quote: Less
    Why do they need so much? Who scared them again?

    ------------------------
    Like who? DPRK of course. With its strike, the DPRK will deprive the United States of land and will have to completely transfer the US Army to ships. laughing
    1. Captain Pushkin
      Captain Pushkin 14 December 2017 21: 15 New
      +2
      Quote: Altona
      Altona Today, 15: 35 New
      Quote: Less
      Why do they need so much? Who scared them again?

      ------------------------
      Like who? DPRK of course. With its strike, the DPRK will deprive the United States of land and will have to completely transfer the US Army to ships. laughing

      Trump announced the imminent flights to the Moon and Mars, so it seems that America does not need old frigates, the fighters will be transplanted into spaceships.
  5. Altona
    Altona 14 December 2017 15: 39 New
    +4
    Quote: siberalt
    Could these "canned" ferment Ukraine, and now there’s nothing to take from them.

    ----------------------------------------------
    Nooooooooooooo. Do you know why? Because Ukraine adopted the mosquito concept of building its Navy. That is, a conditional swarm of inflatable "conditionally invisible on radar" mattresses of the Navy attacks, for example, the cruiser "Moscow". And the frigate "Oliver Hazard Perry" is too noticeable a target for such a concept. laughing laughing
  6. san4es
    san4es 14 December 2017 16: 28 New
    +3

    Performance characteristics
    Type "Oliver Hazard Perry" (Oliver Hazard Perry)
    Displacement: 2769 t. Standard, 3638-4100 t. Full.
    Dimensions: length 135,6 m (with LAMPS 1 system) or 138,1 m (LAMPS III), width 13,7 m, draft 4,5 m.
    EU: single-shaft gas turbine (two General Electric LM2500 engines) with a capacity of 40000 liters. from.
    Speed: 29 knot
    Navigation range: 5200 miles with 20 ties.
    Armament: PU Mk 13 with one guide for 36 Standard missiles SM-1MR and four anti-ship missiles "Harpoon; single-armed universal 76 mm AU Mk 75,20 mm ZAK Mk 15 "Falanks"; two three-pipe 324 mm TA Mk 32 (24 anti-submarine torpedoes Mk 46 or Mk 50); two SH-2F Sysprite helicopters of the LAMPS I or SH-60B Sea Haw LAMPS III system.
    REV: radar - OVTS SPS-48 (V) 4 or 5, ONTS SPS-55, firing control STIR; weapon control system Mk 92; URN-25 receiver of the TACAN radio navigation system; electronic warfare system SLQ-32 (V) 2; two six-barreled PU systems for setting false targets Mk 36 SRBOC; GAS - SQS-56 and the (Underwood and the following) SQR-19 with a towed antenna.
    Crew: 176-200 people.
    1. avt
      avt 14 December 2017 16: 41 New
      +1
      Quote: san4es
      Type "Oliver Hazard Perry" (Oliver Hazard Perry)

      Extremely unsuccessful project.
      1. san4es
        san4es 14 December 2017 16: 50 New
        +3
        Quote: avt
        Extremely unsuccessful project.

        The largest type of ships in the modern US Navy - URO frigates of the Oliver Hazard Perry type were created to replace the Knox type FR and therefore were mainly intended for combating submarines, although they also had anti-aircraft and anti-ship weapons.
        These ships were often criticized for the same shortcomings that were present in frigates of the Knox type, that is, a single-screw propulsion system and the only main weapon (one missile launcher Mk 13). On the other hand, they have advantages arising from some redundancy of their equipment.

        http://zonwar.ru/morskoj/Fregati/Oliver_Hazard_Pe
        rry.html
      2. Manul
        Manul 14 December 2017 23: 31 New
        +1
        Quote: avt
        Extremely unsuccessful project.

        hi Honestly, a little lazy to delve into the search engines. Can you name a couple of problems offhand? PS Yes, and "live" is much more interesting to learn. Not a dry wiki, but a specific opinion.
  7. Sands Careers General
    Sands Careers General 14 December 2017 16: 30 New
    +6
    Regarding the "canned" I immediately remembered the funny film "Raise the periscope")))
    There they canned one canned food.
    1. Svarog51
      Svarog51 15 December 2017 01: 50 New
      +7
      Zhora, hi You are mistaken, the film is called "Remove the periscope." And the "canned" there SS161 Stingray.
      good
      1. Sands Careers General
        Sands Careers General 15 December 2017 02: 48 New
        +4
        Exactly, remove the periscope)) I remember the lieutenant's phrase - "The boat did not sink just because its birds were for $ raly"))
        1. Svarog51
          Svarog51 15 December 2017 02: 55 New
          +5
          And the captain with a tattoo on the jetty? wassat
          1. Sands Careers General
            Sands Careers General 15 December 2017 03: 06 New
            +4
            The film is of course epic)) And it is true, an experienced person on an ancient pelvis can inject a person on a more modern submarine. There, of course, everything is fiction, but often savvy is more effective than technology.

            I damn need a man with a tattoo on fuy!)))
            1. Svarog51
              Svarog51 15 December 2017 03: 14 New
              +5
              I also like him, I downloaded it to my collection.
              And it's true, an experienced person on an ancient pelvis can inject a person on a more modern submarine. There, of course, everything is fiction, but often savvy is more effective than technology.

              No wonder Varshavyanka was nicknamed the Black Hole.
              R.S. I read in one of your comments about the senior lieutenant, with this title on the site and congratulations. Forgive me, maybe I was mistaken.
              1. Sands Careers General
                Sands Careers General 15 December 2017 15: 25 New
                +4
                Actually now I have the same title on the site with reality))

                Just do not understand why the titles on the site jump almost through one. I was not allowed to be a lieutenant)
                1. Svarog51
                  Svarog51 15 December 2017 17: 55 New
                  +4
                  There is a table of ratings, everything is painted there. I can send, but only by mail. And the fact that through the rank the colonel did not appropriate. Therefore it happened. drinks
                  1. Sands Careers General
                    Sands Careers General 15 December 2017 18: 16 New
                    +4
                    Yes, I am not critical in general)) Received an extraordinary rank))
                    1. Svarog51
                      Svarog51 15 December 2017 19: 32 New
                      +4
                      Well then, I will formulate it this way - For service in the combat environment.
                      1. Sands Careers General
                        Sands Careers General 15 December 2017 20: 56 New
                        +4
                        Serving the Republic!
                2. Svarog51
                  Svarog51 15 December 2017 23: 02 New
                  +5
                  Zhora, write more often, participate in discussions - I hope you will overtake me too. good drinks Both there and here.
  8. nikolaev
    nikolaev 15 December 2017 10: 44 New
    0
    still would! much more profitable to cut into metal and build new ones. And stupid taxpayers let them pay for this "pleasure"!