Military Review

"Shell" and C-400 will remain in Syria

30
The C-400 anti-aircraft systems and the Pantsir-C1 rocket-cannon systems will remain at Hmeimim airbase even after the reduction of the Russian forces in Syria, reports TASS the message of the head of the Federation Council Committee on Defense, Viktor Bondarev.




Will definitely stay on Hmeimim,
said the former commander-in-chief of the VKS, answering the corresponding question.

They can not be removed from there. This means almost instantaneous destruction of air targets. I have already said that it was the appearance of this system that brought order to the Syrian sky. "Carapace" shot down so many UAVs, and that does not count,
he explained.

Answering the question about what other forces will remain in Syria, Bondarev said that “there will be as many military specialists as are needed to service the aircraft and the air defense system”, as well as the personnel who will ensure the operation of the logistics center in Tartus .

There will be a sufficient grouping in order to provide the remaining weapons. Both airplanes and helicopters will remain
added the head of the committee.

All our peacekeeping forces will remain. I think the military police will remain. Plus, the demining force - although the Demining Center will be withdrawn, some specialists will remain, because the Syrians in any case need to be taught,
he concluded.
Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Frol 7525
    Frol 7525 14 December 2017 13: 52
    +3
    Free of Charge?
    1. Muvka
      Muvka 14 December 2017 13: 53
      14
      Is the brain disconnected?
      1. Frol 7525
        Frol 7525 14 December 2017 13: 57
        +3
        I even have it, you have it inside, but outside there is one crinkle from the cap, I read your comments.
        1. Muvka
          Muvka 14 December 2017 14: 00
          +7
          Obviously not, if in this news, you can understand something wrong ...
          1. Frol 7525
            Frol 7525 14 December 2017 14: 03
            +3
            Exactly ... Hollow inside. WHAT-THEN it is spelled correctly, write down, there is nothing to remember. laughing
          2. Alena767
            Alena767 14 December 2017 14: 13
            11
            Yes, this is a cheap Troll this Frol, forget about it ..... e, just registered a week ago, already scribbled comments
            1. Frol 7525
              Frol 7525 14 December 2017 14: 25
              +3
              Dear Alena, how nice it is to meet in the middle of all kinds of movies an intelligent, educated and spiritualized Lady ... laughing laughing laughing love It’s good that I have Sons, I would have such a daughter, I would have nailed.
              1. sabakina
                sabakina 14 December 2017 20: 45
                +2
                In which hospital did you drop your head? Al grandmother took midwife?
    2. d ^ Amir
      d ^ Amir 14 December 2017 14: 00
      +5
      they (means of destruction) do not change the jurisdiction ... as they were ours under the control of our specialists and at our bases, they will remain ....
    3. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 14 December 2017 14: 32
      +5
      Quote: Frol 7525
      Free of Charge?

      And who should pay for them? Khmeimim was given to us, EMNIP, indefinitely and free of charge.
      It’s not for ourselves to pay for the air defense covering our air base and our PMTO. smile
    4. Manul
      Manul 14 December 2017 23: 53
      +1
      Quote: Frol 7525
      Free of Charge?

      And what, Japan pays America, for the sake of honor to host their military bases? Liver completely off the coils.
  2. Jedi
    Jedi 14 December 2017 13: 53
    +4
    S-400 anti-aircraft systems and the Pantsir-C1 missile-cannon systems will remain at the Khmeimim airbase even after the reduction of the group of troops of the Russian Federation in Syria

    Well, that’s the official answer to everyone who worried about the fate of Russian air defense in Syria. Not everyone will be happy with this news. wink
    1. Going
      Going 14 December 2017 14: 20
      +6
      It was only the United States thought that we would take them out of there, or rather dreamed.
      1. Jedi
        Jedi 14 December 2017 14: 22
        +3
        The United States did not yet fully understand that the Oblomingo bird flew to them in Syria and was not going to fly away. lol
      2. Ryazan87
        Ryazan87 14 December 2017 14: 28
        +2
        (with interest) do you think they can seriously threaten US aviation? Not in the technical sense, but in the sense of "decision making."
        Come on, the United States, at least the aviation of Israel or, say, Turkey? Given that the Turks have little to do with field artillery, Khmeimim can cover.
        Unless the Shell can come in handy - to shoot down Barmaley copters. And then, consider nesting a nail with a microscope.
        1. Going
          Going 14 December 2017 15: 20
          +5
          What did you want to say, they need to be removed from there?
          1. Ryazan87
            Ryazan87 14 December 2017 15: 59
            +1
            I want to say that it doesn't matter if they are there or not. For players who have serious aircraft in Syria’s airspace (Israel, Turkey and the USA) this is not a hindrance. If they want it - they bombard Damascus (which the Jews have done and are doing repeatedly), it will be necessary - they will bring down the plane (I hope you don’t believe in Erdogan’s "friendship").
            The entire expeditionary force in Syria hangs on a thin thread of communications, which is supported by several Soviet BDKs and hastily bought civilian vessels. Vulnerability is understandable at first glance at a geographical map.
            Any serious aggravation is fatal for the Syrian group - enough to disrupt the supply.
            1. Going
              Going 14 December 2017 16: 03
              +5
              Do you think that they were put there in vain? My opinion was that they were put to cover our bases, not Syria, the second was our base attacked?
              And God forbid we apply them.
              1. Ryazan87
                Ryazan87 14 December 2017 16: 55
                +1
                (patiently) Well, it supplies the Allied Assadists of the Russian Federation, provides direct military assistance against militants, but categorically does not want to cover it from air strikes. Why so? Maybe because he understands what the answer will be from, for example, the same Israel?
                Or are Americans / Turks / Israelis going to attack the Khmeimim base and are constrained by the presence of the S-400? So what?
                If there is a serious airstrike, then the S-400 dead poultice. If it’s a provocation, then I’m afraid there willn’t be enough eggs for decisive action (the tomato-Turkish history quite clearly demonstrated this).
                1. Shahno
                  Shahno 14 December 2017 16: 59
                  +1
                  Well, you understand. Of course. IDF is one of the strongest armies in the world. Well, what can stop us. Only the desire for good relations with Russia.
                  1. Going
                    Going 14 December 2017 17: 42
                    +5
                    That's right, that's why we signed an agreement on actions in Syria and live peacefully. yes
                2. Going
                  Going 14 December 2017 17: 02
                  +6
                  Or are Americans / Turks / Israelis going to attack the Khmeimim base and are constrained by the presence of the S-400? So what?
                  If there is a serious airstrike, then the S-400 dead poultice.


                  Namely, because they want to live, because if our base is attacked, they will not like the answer. Let them try and the word IF is not appropriate to apply.
                  1. Ryazan87
                    Ryazan87 14 December 2017 17: 29
                    +1
                    "they don’t like the answer"
                    - well, it’s just interesting to hear your opinion, what will happen?
                    Okay, let’s leave the sons of Israel alone (otherwise they’re already pulling up). Well, the United States too.
                    Let's say Turkey attacks the base. AND? Do you propose a massive nuclear strike on Ankara? Or will you scare the Black Sea Fleet (1 cruiser under repair + 2 conventionally modern frigates + 6 diesel submarines + collection of Soviet antiques)?
                    Let me remind you that the Turkish Air Force openly destroyed the Russian military aircraft. What happened? Selling tomatoes for six months banned?
                    1. Going
                      Going 14 December 2017 17: 38
                      +6
                      What you say can only be done by a madman and there is no need to audit weapons because they are fighting not only with weapons, and no one wants to fight. Calm down and return to the subject of S-400 and the Shell, and it’s not possible to start a war in five minutes, and preparation will always be noticed.
            2. dauria
              dauria 14 December 2017 16: 49
              0
              The entire expeditionary force in Syria hangs on a thin thread of communications,


              But it stands on a solid platform of the Strategic Missile Forces of the Russian Federation. Why be smart? So argue, then England zilch with all its armed forces - 15 minutes, and take out the saints. And what for they spend money on the army?
              1. Ryazan87
                Ryazan87 14 December 2017 17: 33
                0
                Please read paragraph 27 of the Military Doctrine of the Russian Federation:

                "27. The Russian Federation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in response to the use of nuclear and other types of weapons of mass destruction against it and (or) its allies, as well as in the case of aggression against the Russian Federation using conventional weapons, towhen the very existence of the state is threatened.
                The decision to use nuclear weapons is made by the President of the Russian Federation. "
  3. san4es
    san4es 14 December 2017 13: 57
    +8
    This means almost instant destruction of air targets.

    ... respond to goals ... live their life soldier
    1. sabakina
      sabakina 14 December 2017 20: 51
      +3
      Sancho, thanks for the video !!!
  4. Old military officer
    Old military officer 14 December 2017 16: 21
    0
    Clear business, it is necessary to cover the. There are too many women who want to be pushed by "friends" from across the ocean. At the same time, both the runway and the berths will be in full combat. Let them be.
  5. Old military officer
    Old military officer 14 December 2017 16: 25
    +1
    Quote: Frol 7525
    there would be such a daughter, would have nailed.

    God did not give the pig a horn. otherwise the whole sky would be picked.