Polish Defense Ministry announced plans to modernize three hundred tanks

34
Polish military began market analysis on possible modernization tanks PT-91, based on the licensed version of the Soviet T-72M1. It is reported by Jane's with reference to the statement of the Deputy Minister of Defense of Poland Bartosz Kownacki, made in an interview with Gazeta Polska Codziennie.

We want to upgrade PT-91
- said the deputy head of the defense department
We focus on the price of about 4 million zlotys for the modernization of one tank (about 1,1 million dollars - ed.). We have about 300 such combat vehicles, so the cost of the program as a whole will exceed 1 billion zł




Polish Defense Ministry announced plans to modernize three hundred tanks


The procedure for analyzing and evaluating offers will last 18 months. Warsaw considers upgrading the PT-91 tanks as an interim solution, before a new generation of tanks will enter the troops. In particular, PT-91 should get new 125-mm ammunition, which will increase their anti-tank capabilities.

In September, at the largest defense exhibition in Poland MSPO, which was held in Kielce, Bumar-Łabędy, part of Polska Grupa Zbrojeniowa (PGZ), presented a possible upgrade package for PT-91.

The improved tank is proposed to equip with the active armor of the new generation ERAWA and equip it with a 2A46MS caliber 125 mm / L46 caliber made in Slovakia with an upgraded automatic loader and SAVAN-15 fire control system.

The driver’s seat will be equipped with a PNK-72 Radomka night vision device and a KDN-1 Nyks round-the-clock camera. Additional equipment will include a TKN-3Z night-vision sight for the commander and a SOD circular viewing system.

Bumar-Łabędy also proposes to strengthen the PT-91 suspension, upgrade the manual gearbox and install the S-12U engine with HP 850 power.

In addition, Jane's learned about the plans of the Polish Ministry of Defense to modernize in Czechoslovakia self-propelled howitzers vz.2018 Dana with the wheel formula 2020х77 in 8-8. At the same time, the local military intend to keep the 152-mm gun and not to replace it with the standard NATO 155-mm howitzer. We intend to focus on improving the Tatra T-815 VT Kolos chassis, reports "Voennoe.RF"
  • Polish Ministry of Defense
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

34 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    13 December 2017 18: 42
    In short, they collect the Polish Frankenstein.
    1. +6
      13 December 2017 18: 49
      Quote: 210ox
      In short, they collect the Polish Frankenstein.

      How is it that they Abrashek were not going to buy 500 pieces. Out of order. The painful tramp did not overlook ............
      1. +5
        13 December 2017 18: 57
        Quote: Pirogov
        How is it that they Abrashek were not going to buy 500 pieces. Out of order. The sickle did not overlook the painful

        Yes, he’ll even squeeze it, at the "market" price (and the "Merkava" are written off in pursuit ..))))
        Poland will still be "meat" in which case ... soldier (We won’t regret Warsaw this time) And we will protect our soldiers, everyone !!!! soldier ,
      2. +1
        13 December 2017 21: 06
        Quote: Pirogov
        How is it they are not going to buy Abrashek pieces 500

        They are buying Leopards 2. Considering them better. and Now, it turns out that way, but Poland has the largest tank fist in NATO in that direction ...
        1. +1
          14 December 2017 06: 19
          Poland has the largest tank fist in NATO in that direction
          I agree .. The Polish army is the most serious of the Euronatists, I don’t understand the silly smiles in the comments .. oh, yes, like for "wit"))
  2. +7
    13 December 2017 18: 42
    possible modernization of the PT-91 tanks, based on the licensed version of the Soviet T-72M1

    The main thing is to have enough mind. And then to create your tank - it turned out to be not enough fool
    1. +8
      13 December 2017 18: 51
      And is it worth every country to have its own tank, TV, computer, etc. ..? In the age of integration we live, the phone is in your pocket, is it not Russian? wink
      1. +4
        13 December 2017 19: 11
        Integration is with friends, or at least not with enemies. And what kind of Poles are friends now, if on every corner Russia is called the main enemy?
        1. +7
          13 December 2017 21: 17
          And I understand integration, Volodymyr, –– it’s not worth it to rest on the creation of your own something, which is not a fact that it’ll turn out good when someone’s possible good buy ... For example, I have a German chainsaw, with which I have prepared several trailers of firewood for the winter ... They all shared with us and Rodney, so I'm not a patriot? smile
          1. +5
            13 December 2017 21: 23
            Completely - for! A good thing can be bought and exchanged for barter. Why reinvent the wheel? But the concept of "integration" implies the interconnection of two entities in any field. Do we have much in common with the Poles? And in the military field - especially. It sometimes seems to me that the last adequate Poles were four tankers and a dog lol
    2. +1
      14 December 2017 01: 19
      not true ! without a single nail the panzer, as the song sings laughing
      1. +1
        14 December 2017 02: 38
        cool cartoon, smiled ...
        But how will the child prodigy be in Polish?
  3. +7
    13 December 2017 18: 46
    Warsaw considers modernization of tanks PT-91
    hi
    Tuning T-72M1
  4. +3
    13 December 2017 18: 55
    Do not understand. Does the T-72 fit into NATO standards?
    1. +5
      13 December 2017 19: 03
      Quote: Piramidon
      Do not understand. Does the T-72 fit into NATO standards?

      ... Full program (with changes)
    2. +5
      13 December 2017 19: 12
      The wrong word fits. It is an ideal to strive for wink
    3. +2
      13 December 2017 21: 06
      Quote: Piramidon
      Do not understand. Does the T-72 fit into NATO standards?

      And not only he, but everything else is our weapon.
  5. +2
    13 December 2017 19: 08
    But what about desovetization? wassat Tanks Poles must immediately get away with it lol Otherwise, at least double standards are on the face! lol
  6. +3
    13 December 2017 19: 24
    Quote: Frol 7525
    And is it worth every country to have its own tank, TV, computer, etc. ..? In the age of integration we live, the phone is in your pocket, is it not Russian? wink

    But the radio stations in the same tanks are Russian.
    Integration...
    Was in Russia with krajina.
    We still disentangle.

    The meaning of the defense cycle in independence.
    And this topic is not about Psheks and Kraintsy.
  7. +1
    13 December 2017 19: 47
    Poles, their brains did not try to upgrade ...
    1. +3
      13 December 2017 20: 36
      Quote: Volka
      Poles, their brains did not try to upgrade ...


      How will they be able to modernize what they don’t have and will not have for a very long time since the brains do not brow, you can’t draw them?
      1. +1
        13 December 2017 22: 38
        oh, yes, the Germans psia krev have not considered people for a long time.
  8. +1
    13 December 2017 19: 49
    and with this junk the Poles are still trying to bark at Russia ...
    1. 0
      13 December 2017 21: 51
      That is, in your opinion, in our “nth” time the modernized t-72 is a cool tank, and the Polish version of this machine is junk? Oh well...
      1. 0
        14 December 2017 04: 46
        Quote: Leader of the Redskins
        we have in the "nth" time the modernized t-72 is a cool tank, and the Polish version of this machine is junk? Oh well...

        T72B3 about. For 16 years he was very fit (this is the one with the relict, 2A46M-5 and V-92S2F from T90). The Polish version looks more modest.
  9. +3
    13 December 2017 20: 35
    How are the Poles still not abandoned tanks developed in the USSR? Only due to lack of funds. Otherwise, they would have taken it and caved in front of the United States by purchasing from them hundreds of 3 new Abrams.
    1. +2
      13 December 2017 21: 12
      Quote: NF68
      How are the Poles still not abandoned tanks developed in the USSR?

      There is no money for another weapon yet
      Quote: NF68
      Otherwise, they would have taken it and caved in front of the United States by purchasing from them hundreds of 3 new Abrams.

      They prefer the German Leopards to buy ...
      1. +3
        13 December 2017 21: 40
        belay ... This is not a parade - Tank Run fellow
        1. +1
          13 December 2017 21: 52
          Quote: san4es
          .This is not a parade - Tank Run

          This is really not the parade itself, but the movement of technology. Our same so "runs"
          1. +4
            13 December 2017 22: 02
            soldier ... in two columns.
  10. +1
    13 December 2017 21: 49
    Isn’t it that dill has recently been contracted by them? Maybe for security features?
  11. +1
    13 December 2017 23: 12
    RT-91 is an abbreviation like Polish tank? laughing
  12. +2
    14 December 2017 00: 02
    300 tanks brought together is already a tank division. Two times to refuel, in Minsk and Smolensk and all arrived, Moscow. Why are all of the Westerners drawn to the east, to us? That’s whom you don’t take from our traitors, because they all break to the west, but as soon as they get used to it in the west, they immediately turn their faces and begin to bark to the east. Inexplicable natural anthropological phenomenon.
  13. 0
    14 December 2017 10: 45
    From the ongoing modernization, it can be understood that the calibers remain the same, not NATO. Modernization itself is also only in the Slavic countries - Slovakia and the Czech Republic. Thus, in which case Poland can be both yours and ours, depending on the current situation.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"