Vojislav Seselj: Serbia must join the CSTO

66
Leader of the parliamentary Serbian Radical Party Vojislav Seselj in an interview RIA News called on the Serbian authorities to apply for membership in the CSTO and to strengthen integration with Russia.

According to Seselj, the visit to Russia of Serbian President Alexander Vucic, scheduled for December 18-20, can be used to strengthen cooperation between Moscow and Belgrade.



Vojislav Seselj: Serbia must join the CSTO


I think he (Vučić - ed.) Should immediately apply for Serbia’s accession to the CSTO and begin deeper integration with Russia and enter into all integration processes in which Russia participates. It is also necessary to provide diplomatic status to the employees of the Nizh center, and ask them to set up a permanent Russian base in Serbia. We want such a degree of integration with the Russian Federation that in case of danger Russia would defend Serbia as itself
- declared Seselj

We would like to join the CSTO, go deeper into integration with Russia, as much as possible, how Belarus is integrated and even more
- he noted.

According to the parliamentary resolution 2007 of the year, Serbia maintains neutrality with regard to military alliances, but the country's parliament ratified 12 of February 2016 of the year a document on diplomatic immunity for NATO representatives and logistic support in the republic.

Serbia's individual partnership plan with NATO (IPAP) came into force in March 2015, the document defines educational and technical cooperation, joint exercises and the creation of a positive image of the alliance in Serbian society. At the same time, in 2013, the Serbian Parliament was granted observer status in the CSTO Parliamentary Assembly.
  • http://www.bbc.com/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

66 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    13 December 2017 11: 38
    Oh, I see
    We want such a degree of integration with the Russian Federation that Russia in case of danger would protect Serbia as itself
    while we squash the seeds aside
    1. +10
      13 December 2017 11: 41
      Who wants to live in harmony with Russia, welcome, only we must defend ourselves together.
      1. +4
        13 December 2017 11: 45
        The leader of the Serbian parliamentary radical party Vojislav Seshel in an interview with RIA Novosti called on the Serbian authorities to apply for membership in the CSTO and strengthen integration with Russia.

        I am afraid that these words will go unanswered, or even be completely drowned out by NATO supporters there, led by the lesbian prime minister.
        1. +1
          13 December 2017 11: 52
          Yes, they have no other way if they wish to live independently. Russia guarantees the inviolability of borders and at the same time does not make it bend.
        2. +3
          13 December 2017 12: 07
          Sheshel looks like Zhirinovsky, and the "ideas" he expressed are not very smart - the CSTO is a loose organization and is basically not able to protect anyone. As far as I can tell, the situation is on the Armenian - Azerbaijani border. It’s just that Mr. Sheshel wants Russians in the 21st century with bayonets to revive Yugoslavia. The sooner the Serbs get rid of imperial mirages and phantoms, the better for them first of all.
          1. +1
            13 December 2017 12: 43
            And what Azeri, Yerevan took ?? Or Karabakh? Or do you think that you are there all “super” wars and Azerbaijanis are afraid of you? Only that Armenia is in the CSTO is saving you. In addition to Russia, there are only "enemies" around ...
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. +1
                13 December 2017 13: 27
                Wow ... menacingly laughing Firstly, on this site, such tips
                Quote: katana
                shove yourself in one place

                They are not welcome ... Secondly, the Azerbaijani troops did not cross the border of Armenia and did not inflict blows on the territory ... And my advice to you. Before commenting, it’s worth thinking, otherwise you will soon, just write .. wink Not wrong ... Read Only lol
              2. +1
                13 December 2017 16: 27
                propose that instead of Armenians Russian soldiers die? interesting for what? Azerbaijanis declared war on Armenians? military operations in Armenia? or is Nagorno-Karabakh recognized as part of Armenia? while you put your tongue in that dark place
                1. +1
                  13 December 2017 20: 48
                  Quote: Not Liberoid Russian
                  that darkest place

                  good I fully support ... And then help for a penny, and the requirements for the ruble ...
      2. +7
        13 December 2017 11: 51
        Vojislav Seshel during the wars in the former Yugoslavia of the 90-s. actively participated in the organization and leadership of Serb volunteer units, took an active part in the hostilities in Croatia and Bosnia as the organizer of armed units of Serb volunteers. The only Serb of this status (leader of the nationalist Serbian party!) Who, in spite of everything, was released from the ICTY, although he was "pressed" severely. Repeatedly ran for the presidency, but the European integrators did everything to prevent him from real power.
        Very interesting, in many ways, personality.
        This is what we need to support in the next Serbian elections, as the United States and Europe do with their proteges.
        The union will be such that the entire former social camp will be envious. CSTO is a real counterweight to the EU and NATO.
        Despite “our” frank betrayal during the Yeltsin-Kozyrev diplomacy, the Serbs are always ready in alliance with Russia to bully NATO.
      3. 0
        13 December 2017 13: 06
        I will say one thing to the Serbs
    2. 0
      13 December 2017 11: 48
      To call for this is one thing, but really joining the CSTO is quite another.
      1. 0
        13 December 2017 12: 26
        So what are we talking about? Russia must deliver its man to lead Serbia. There is no real alternative to Sheshel and never will be.
        Take on the job, help forces and means to win the struggle for power ...
        There will be real power, there will be real things! And now it’s not even a “call”, but a real “guide to action”.
        Otherwise, NATO and the EU, sooner or later, will squeeze the Serbs through European integrators. Civil confrontation is also possible, what globalists need. Montenegro recent as an example to us!
    3. +6
      13 December 2017 11: 49
      Quote: Not Liberoid Russian
      while we squash the seeds aside

      Not certainly in that way
    4. +1
      13 December 2017 12: 00
      That's right .. Do we need it? You can be friends, but you need to shed Russian blood only for Russia.
      1. GRF
        +3
        13 December 2017 12: 17
        Quote: seti
        That's right .. Do we need it? You can be friends, but you need to shed Russian blood only for Russia.

        Clearly, we will not be for the friends of the Slavs, only for Russia.

        We ourselves do not notice how we urge to divide, so that others dominate.
        Do you know a parable about the prodigal son?
        1. +4
          13 December 2017 12: 26
          Let me remind you that Russians are infringed all over the world .. For example, in the country 4о4 is right there .. For all that, 145 million (probably throw other nations out of the account less), while there should be at least 1 billion .. Why are there so few of us? Yes, because the very best perish for strangers I will repeat strangers' interests and countries. Then they themselves are in the chill. Start a new war for Serbia again Russian Vanya die in Geyropa and in 50 years your grave will be leveled with a bulldozer ..? And the leadership is sluggish, it’ll mumble like we’re against something ..
          Serbs need help, arm, provide diplomatic support .. But to fight for them .. Probably not worth it.
          1. GRF
            +1
            13 December 2017 13: 55
            Quote: seti
            But to fight for them .. Probably not worth it.

            It’s not worth fighting at all ... Especially for the interests of others, but since Vanya does not know what his interest is, he will always fight for the universal, such karma ...
            1. +2
              13 December 2017 14: 18
              If Vanya does not know where his interest and the interest of his homeland is, then you need to do so to know. So that our children in the Bundestag would not chew snot for Nazi prisoners, but for the hero of his grandfather who urinated on the destroyed Reichstag. To say how they minted to get to the whole rotten essence of every Russophobe politician.
              Here listen to Zhirik how to say it:
        2. 0
          13 December 2017 12: 47
          Yeah, something the same Yugoslavia and the USSR did not really want to be friends - the same sitters on 2 chairs were. And as you need, so immediately "brothers Slavs" pamagiti.
          1. GRF
            0
            13 December 2017 13: 45
            Quote: Dr_Engie
            Yeah, something the same Yugoslavia and the USSR did not really want to be friends - the same sitters on 2 chairs were. And as you need, so immediately "brothers Slavs" pamagiti.

            Whoever remembers the old, the eye is out.
            And whoever forgets - both.
      2. +3
        13 December 2017 12: 24
        Quote: seti
        You can be friends, but you need to shed Russian blood only for Russia.

        And Belarus, how side?
        It’s not disgusting to write this yourself? negative
        1. +2
          13 December 2017 12: 35
          Quote: LSA57
          And Belarus, how side?
          It’s not disgusting to write this yourself? negative

          Do not be disgusted .. Belarusians are just with us in the CSTO. I did not write anything about them. And it is understandable if Lukashenko did not pull the blanket, then they would live in one country and not in different ones.
          Tomorrow, Cameroon, Angola or Sudan will be asked (their president recently flied one of these days), let’s take them too, well, our brothers are only black .. And the USSR was friends. But this is a joke.
          It is possible and possible to take Serbia .. If only they themselves want to, this is a question. But let me remind you that Serbia has no access to the world, and the same Serbs, now called by the Montenegrins misunderstanding, are already in NATO. So Serbia is surrounded on all (!) Sides by NATO countries.
          How will we supply .. Help .. Even communicate if we are not allowed to go there and the planes will be deployed ...? So here it is necessary to think and not to wave with a saber that we are for everyone and I am Dartanyan.
          1. +2
            13 December 2017 12: 43
            Quote: seti
            Do not be disgusted .. Belarusians are just with us in the CSTO. I did not write anything about them.

            Yes? but this alone is enough
            You can be friends, but you need to shed Russian blood only for Russia.
            1. 0
              13 December 2017 14: 07
              But I do not share Russia and Belarus. The people are one. It's just that our apartments are different. And it's time to live in one. And more reliable and safer.
        2. +1
          13 December 2017 15: 32
          And Belarus, how side?
          - Let them decide for themselves.
      3. +1
        13 December 2017 12: 33
        Badly, however, you understand the allied relations and interests of your Power. Throughout its entire Great History, Russia shed blood for its own friends, and therefore Russia is called the Great. Therefore, we are now those who we are. This is not even geopolitics, but a worldview.
        Otherwise, international and world authority cannot be earned.
        And by the way! Many respond and reciprocate, fulfilling their allied obligations. Including blood.
        1. +3
          13 December 2017 12: 57
          Better try to shed your blood in the Donbass and do not write to me for our interests. From the couch it is certainly more visible.
          We do not need world authority but a strong economy, a decent salary - so that having worked the season at the factory / on the ground, you could also relax with dignity and not think where to squeeze where to borrow. What to feed a child and why put it on its feet .. Housing needs affordable and much more.
          What authority are you talking about if a Russian in Bandera (the former fraternal republic) is oppressed only because he is Russian and communicates (while communicating) in Russian? Russian in the Baltic States is not a citizen .. And on your hands has this if you do not know:

          Where is the indignation of our powers that be?
          And here you are crap for someone’s interests for familiarity .. Yes, enough for us all to help, it's time to help ourselves and everyone Russian worldwide. To create conditions for the returnees by the will of fate and the partition of the USSR left behind the hillock and giving passports to all ethnic Russians who wish to return to the Russian Federation. Help them with the arrangement. What do you know about how a Russian person can obtain citizenship in the Russian Federation? Yes, to anyone who wants to return .. Yes, for any Tajik (just for example) it is much easier to obtain citizenship. I know what I'm writing about.
          When there is a strong country with a well-fed and well-to-do, well-to-do population then we can talk about international respect .. And Russians are caught as animals around the world (the case of Seleznev, the case of Bout, Yaroshenko ...) and judged in the same USA and give the unthinkable timing ..
          1. 0
            13 December 2017 13: 05
            We do not need world authority but a strong economy, a decent salary - so that having worked the season at the factory / on the ground, you could also relax with dignity and not think where to squeeze where to borrow. What to feed a child and why put it on its feet .. Housing needs affordable and much more.
            I would bet 100+, but it is impossible. good
      4. 0
        14 December 2017 09: 43
        If you don’t maintain close enough contact, they will gradually lose faith in the unifying Russian potential, the pro-Russian “craving” will go off the hook, as a result of which there will be a gradual infiltration of liberoids into their parliament (as in 404) and the country will acquire a new vector. It is known what. In fact, another state will gain a deformed independence from "Russian influence" ... Sew cannot be approximated .. Where do we put commas?
    5. 0
      13 December 2017 12: 21
      Only we do not need to exaggerate the role of Serbian supporters of integration with Russia. They face fierce resistance, which is very difficult to counter, since Serbia is territorially isolated from Russia. And the brothers from Bulgaria, the servants of Nata, were very shameful in this.
      Judging by the chronology of the events specified in the article,
      - In 2013, the Serbian parliament received observer status in the CSTO Parliamentary Assembly.
      - The parliament of the country ratified on February 12, 2016 a document on diplomatic immunity for NATO representatives and logistical support in the republic.

      The trend is not very visible in our favor.
    6. The comment was deleted.
  2. +5
    13 December 2017 11: 38
    A sensible thought, but so far no sense has been seen from the CSTO ..
    1. +3
      13 December 2017 11: 44
      but from NATO, it’s a good thing to see that the kopek ...
      1. +5
        13 December 2017 11: 47
        Quote: Alex_Rarog
        but from NATO, it’s a good thing to see that the kopek ...

        Well, at least Nata are fighting together .. and the CSTO is so sick so far .. Although that which is not against us is already good)
      2. +1
        13 December 2017 12: 43
        NATO's task is to eliminate any potential "centers of resistance" in Eastern Europe, the former satellites of the USSR, in the event of a global war.
        And, what really causes respect for the "Balkan Russians" (as the Serbs are called in the EU), they will not break, like the same Ukrainian brothers (who were much closer and were kindly treated by us), and which is typical, Sheshel mentioned Belarusians as well. That integration of RS into international structures of the Russian Federation should be unprecedented.
    2. +1
      13 December 2017 11: 51
      Yeah It is hard to imagine how the Armenians or Kazakhs will go to fight for the Serbian Slavs. belay
      1. +1
        13 December 2017 12: 36
        In principle, this has already happened. They fought along with others in 41-45 for all of Europe.
      2. 0
        13 December 2017 12: 44
        Only volunteers. Donbass to you as an example.
        Ah, the Serbs will go.
  3. +1
    13 December 2017 11: 39
    With all due respect to the shared history, 2% of GDP and please - we will start negotiations.
    1. +5
      13 December 2017 11: 40
      Quote: Astoria
      With all due respect to the shared history, 2% of GDP and please - we will start negotiations.

      I agree, an important point, otherwise there are many who want to neck)
    2. 0
      13 December 2017 11: 45
      Looking at what angle to look
      The CSTO is already an alliance with certain goals of its existence.
      The countries of this union have already found goals for joint business.
      They are not on the side of the opponents of Russia
      Isn't that enough?
    3. 0
      13 December 2017 12: 46
      This is whose standard, 2%? Is it not NATO?
      In Russia, another standard in price is mutual assistance and mutual assistance.
      1. 0
        13 December 2017 13: 02
        In Russia, another standard in price is mutual assistance and mutual assistance.
        It’s not a question - but when the next tax is raised, we will all turn to you laughing
        1. 0
          13 December 2017 14: 49
          Well, and what are you taxing here for? Not a topic at all.
          In Russia, for your information, one of the lowest taxes in the world.
          And, here in battle, mutual assistance and mutual assistance is a vital thing. Contact Yes
          If we are on one side, and judging by your concern only about taxes, it’s not at all a fact.
          And how are we both Chechen companies and the subsequent wars pulled out without thinking about taxes?
          Judging by the name (Dirk Astor) and lack of attachment to your place of residence, are you a citizen of the world?
          1. 0
            13 December 2017 15: 28
            Pax tecum - You are either a child, or you just think at the level of children's trolling, you have already been collectively explained that placing a base in Serbia at a cost is equivalent to placing on the Moon, since it has no access to the sea. You will never be allowed to place a missile base there, since this is tantamount to the introduction of an economic embargo against Serbia with the closure of all borders, and this is for a second 7 * 10 ^ 6 potentially hungry mouths. No reasonable Serb would agree to this.

            Judging by the color of your beret, you are also not a hero of the galaxy laughing
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. +1
    13 December 2017 11: 49
    and ask to organize a permanent Russian base in Serbia
    For a moderate fee or barter? Hearing this (although this is not realistic), Americans will crawl out of their skin to prevent this. On the other hand, what about the participation of Serbia in NATO programs? Who will allow Vucic to contact the CSTO?
    Russia in case of danger would defend Serbia as itself
    But this is purely Serbian - when there is a threat it’s not a sin to recall Russia.
    1. +1
      13 December 2017 12: 51
      Well, why don’t you mention the CIS countries, CSTO, Transcaucasia, Syria? What kind of election policy do you have?
      They also “had a threat” and they “remembered” about Russia. Not?
      1. 0
        14 December 2017 03: 11
        And where is the "election policy"? In the article, the conversation is about Serbia and not a word about the countries belonging to the CSTO. Not?
  6. 0
    13 December 2017 11: 51
    If it were earlier, while they had access to the sea ... Or if in the days of the USSR Yugoslavia would be our ally ... And now I don’t even know if we need it?
  7. +1
    13 December 2017 11: 53
    ... the parliament of the country ratified on February 12, 2016 a document on diplomatic immunity for NATO representatives and logistic support in the republic.

    And for the pussy and the pussy with one hand? This does not happen, with all sympathy for the Serbian Republic. In addition, there are great risks for the CSTO in integration with the republic, which is completely surrounded by NATO countries. Yes
    1. +1
      13 December 2017 13: 05
      This will be the geopolitical defensive line of Russia behind enemy lines, where the NATO machine will simply get stuck in ground battles (remember 1999, where NATO was afraid of ground operations).
      And, if you recall the story (Serbs throughout Europe "met" the German Nazis like the Soviet Union), and even study the basics of geopolitics, then your short-sighted comments will seem inappropriate to you.
      The Soviet Union had global propaganda work, i.e. in many respects he won the very “information war” that you cannot say now about just a weak imitation of this activity, even if “confusion and staggering in the brain” inside the country is in the order of things.
      This is Russia's support for the national leader of Serbia, his coming to power, the integration of Serbia into the international institutions of Russia and should be the very climax of the victory in information wars.
      1. 0
        14 December 2017 12: 29
        Quote: Pax tecum
        This is Russia's support for the national leader of Serbia, his coming to power, the integration of Serbia into the international institutions of Russia and should be the very climax of the victory in information wars.


        Sorry, but Sheshel does not solve anything. Yes, he enjoys authority, but the course of the country is decided by the parliament and the president, and they are “out of the blue” with a greater bias towards the EU and NATO. A similar picture with Moldova (unfortunately). From how we will interpret the situation in VO, it will not become sweeter in the mouth. Yes
  8. +5
    13 December 2017 12: 18
    With Sheshel, everything is clear, because he did not betray himself, his country, his convictions.
    It’s more and more difficult with the Serbs, but they are unlikely to solve the problem, they won’t go ... let them decide for themselves.
    1. +2
      13 December 2017 13: 11
      And, this will be the work of Sheshel himself.
      1. +4
        13 December 2017 13: 58
        That is correct.
        A respected man, as a national hero - he knows better.
        It will be able to avert its people from the temptation of a geyropa, a monument to him during his life can be put !!!
        No, no, not for us to suffer.
  9. +1
    13 December 2017 12: 46
    Ninada.
    They will do more harm than good. As in World War I, well, they entered the war, and as a result, they only superseded RI.
    So here, Belarus will begin to beg for money and weapons, and in response there will be WORDS about loyalty, which practice will not be supported.
    1. 0
      13 December 2017 13: 54
      By entering the war, the Republic of Ingushetia “sucked” as you say, the Romanians, who were defeated instantly and Russia had to urgently create a new - the Southern (Romanian) front. And no one asked the Serbs, they were attacked.
      1. 0
        13 December 2017 14: 37
        Well, yes, just in their ambitions to create a “great Serbia” they fanned the war, giving Casus Belli to Austria-Hungary and drawing RI into the war.
        And yes, well done and a very necessary ally.
        I won’t be surprised if they are now driven by the same daydream about “great Serbia”, or about the revival of Yugoslavia.
        1. 0
          13 December 2017 14: 44
          So I did not say a word that this is a necessary ally) If they had access to the sea, then another thing. And in the conditions when Serbia is surrounded on all sides by the countries of the alliance ... this must be very carefully thought before making a decision.
  10. 0
    13 December 2017 13: 16
    Quote: Svarog
    A sensible thought, but so far no sense has been seen from the CSTO ..

    This does not mean that he is not.
    The teachings are in full swing. So far, no one is encroaching on the borders of the CIS-CSTO. Stsut!
    Isn't that good?
    Or is there a "hot head" in real battles to check this? So after all, it is possible to shrink within the borders from such “courage”.
  11. 0
    13 December 2017 17: 42
    Serbs are climbing into the EU in captivity, and through cooperation with NATO. And they chose Vucic, and not Sheshel, for which about 6% of the voters voted. All talk about the CSTO populism pure water ...
  12. 0
    13 December 2017 20: 41
    Correct solution. And we will not have a superfluous base there. It will be just the place.
  13. 0
    13 December 2017 21: 56
    Vojislav is right. Serbs, geographically far from Russia, but close in spirit!
  14. 0
    13 December 2017 23: 23
    Quote: Shura Perm
    I will say one thing to the Serbs

    Serbia and the like only want to have its own gesheft in disagreement between Russia and others.
  15. 0
    13 December 2017 23: 47
    Quote: Pax tecum
    Badly, however, you understand the allied relations and interests of your Power. Throughout its entire Great History, Russia shed blood for its own friends, and therefore Russia is called the Great. Therefore, we are now those who we are. This is not even geopolitics, but a worldview.
    Otherwise, international and world authority cannot be earned.
    And by the way! Many respond and reciprocate, fulfilling their allied obligations. Including blood.

    I support seti, Serbs us ballast. CSTO is an illusion. The military assistance of the Russian Federation on the part of a member of the community is already very doubtful.
  16. 0
    14 December 2017 00: 00
    hmm, but the animals will still flee from Kosovo, this is not soon, but inevitable, and Vojislav Sheshel’s health was destroyed by creatures, but the CST is like NATO: there is only one army there, if our economy is supported by that .. ..

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"