Beijing and New Delhi have agreed to maintain peace at the border

6
The foreign ministers of India and China Sushma Swaraj and Wang Yi discussed the bilateral relations during the meeting and expressed their readiness to jointly maintain peace on the border, avoid conflicts and strengthen mutual trust, reports RIA News.



Relations between India and China are at a key stage, the parties still need to build mutual trust. If there is mutual trust, then there is hope that individual issues will be settled on the basis of mutual understanding and mutual concessions. In the conditions of lack of mutual trust, any problem will constantly spill over and erode bilateral relations,
The Chinese minister said at the meeting.

He noted that relations between China and India this year “generally supported the development trend, but they are by no means satisfactory.” Wang Yi called the Doblam border violation incident a “serious test” of bilateral relations.

Resolving this incident in a diplomatic way demonstrated the maturity of bilateral relations, but it is necessary to learn a lesson from this and prevent similar incidents from happening in the future.
said the head of the Chinese foreign ministry.

In turn, Indian Foreign Minister Sushma Svaraj noted that New Delhi attaches great importance to relations with Beijing, stressing that "India and China have more common interests than contradictions." In a difficult international situation, India-China relations face certain challenges, “but in general they support the trend of stable development”.

Resolving the incident at the precinct, Doklam fully demonstrated the political wisdom of the two parties. The Indian side proceeds from the fact that the common interests of India and China far exceed the existing contradictions. The parties need to strengthen strategic contacts, strengthen strategic mutual trust and in no way prevent contradictions from becoming a conflict, and the conflict turned into clashes,
she said.

Recall that tensions between China and India around the situation on the Doklam Plateau, a mountainous area at the convergence of the borders of China, India and Bhutan, continued from mid-June to late August. The Chinese workers made their way there, which caused a protest from Bhutan. A few days later, the servicemen of India, with whom Bhutan had friendly relations, crossed the state border and, after a brief skirmish, drove the Chinese military out of the Doklam area.

The Chinese Foreign Ministry later said that the section where the road was being built was once again under the control of the Chinese military.

India claims to have acted in coordination with Bhutan, and considers the main goal to prevent a change in the status quo in the region, since, according to Delhi and Thimphu, the border issue is not settled here.

At the end of August, the foreign affairs agencies of the two countries announced an agreement on the withdrawal of troops in Doklam.
  • http://www.globallookpress.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

6 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    12 December 2017 15: 29
    There, from their "world" from Bhutan, even traces of propane will not be found! !!! what
    1. +3
      12 December 2017 16: 32
      Well, you need to start somewhere, not bad for a start ... The State Department is probably tearing and mosquing, dreaming of pitting these countries, because you can get enough of it in such a slaughter .. (I think it could have done without Russia)
  2. +3
    12 December 2017 16: 01
    Really good news ..... If Pakistan joined in this dialogue .... Then it will be Bobmba for the politics of England and the USA ....
    1. 0
      12 December 2017 16: 16
      Quote: LAWNER
      Really good news ..... If Pakistan has joined this dialogue .... That will be Bobmba for the politics of England and the USA....
      That's for sure, and don’t go to the grandmother. Mattresses will throw all their strength into stirring up a provocation there.
  3. +3
    12 December 2017 16: 03
    Really found the strength to negotiate? It turned out that the war is not at all profitable for them at all? It would be good if this intention was serious on both sides.
  4. AKC
    0
    12 December 2017 16: 04
    as in a joke. will maintain peace so that there will be no stone on stone!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"