Military Review

How many aircraft and helicopters of the Russian Aerospace Forces will leave Syria in the near future

96
Information confirmed earlier in the media about the military equipment and units that were the first to leave the territory of the Syrian Arab Republic was confirmed. Information about the technique of the troops was clarified on the basis of the statement of the General Sergey Surovikin, Commander-in-Chief of the All-Union Military Space Force of the Russian Federation:
Received the task and proceeded to the withdrawal of troops as part of 25 aircraft, including 23 aircraft of various modifications, X-NUMX Ka-2 helicopter, as well as military contingent in the composition of the military police of the Russian Federation, special purpose detachment, military clearance center .



How many aircraft and helicopters of the Russian Aerospace Forces will leave Syria in the near future


In the most active phase of the counter-terrorism operation in Syria, the Russian aviation the group consisted of up to 70 aircraft and helicopters.

Recall that on a permanent basis in Syria remain a military airbase in Lattakia (Hamim), as well as a logistics point in Tartus.

Today, the order to withdraw most of the Russian troops from Syria was personally given by the Supreme Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Armed Forces (President) Vladimir Putin. He arrived on a short working visit to the UAR, where he thanked the Russian military and held a personal meeting with the head of Syria, Bashar Assad.
Photos used:
MO RF
96 comments
Ad

The editorial board of Voenniy Obozreniye urgently needs a proofreader. Requirements: impeccable knowledge of the Russian language, diligence, discipline. Contact: [email protected]

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. shura7782
    shura7782 11 December 2017 19: 03 New
    +4
    The remaining work will be found.
    1. dSK
      dSK 11 December 2017 19: 14 New
      +6
      Hello, Alexander!
      Quote: shura7782
      there is work.

      "Vladimir Vladimirovich noted that"if the terrorists in Syria raise their heads again, we will strike at them such blows that they have not yet seen. "
      Airplanes are not ships, they can return in case of what they can in hours. hi
      1. poquello
        poquello 11 December 2017 19: 26 New
        12
        Quote: dsk
        Airplanes are not ships, they can return in case of what they can in hours.

        and ships to pull and return is not necessary
        1. 210ox
          210ox 11 December 2017 19: 30 New
          +5
          That's for sure .. Maybe right from the raid in the Astrakhan region ..
          Quote: poquello
          Quote: dsk
          Airplanes are not ships, they can return in case of what they can in hours.

          and ships to pull and return is not necessary
          1. Alena Frolovna
            Alena Frolovna 11 December 2017 21: 48 New
            +6
            For a day, three countries, three Presidents, three difficult stages of negotiations. It costs a lot!

            The words of Assad, who told a Russian journalist that Russia has become even stronger than the USSR.

            - Why? - surprised one. - We now have less territory, demographics are worse, the economy is under sanctions.

            And you know what the president of Syria answered him? He said: "You, the Russians, now have a strong spirit".
            1. Kasym
              Kasym 11 December 2017 22: 22 New
              +7
              Assad’s other interesting statement about aviation was a pleasure. I can not literally, but related to the use of aviation and its operation. In fact, one mixed air regiment was able to constantly keep someone in the air and control the situation. Flight time at 5 Amer. generations write that is very large; and the 4th Russian turns out to be very small. This is very important, the plane can make 3-4 flights a day, if only the crews do not "break down". And then the United States must have absolute superiority in 1-2 sorties, more people in order to have parity with the Russian Aerospace Forces. In short, it turns out more expensive, and significantly. hi
            2. igorka357
              igorka357 12 December 2017 02: 57 New
              +2
              The spirit of the Russian people is always in order, and Assad was mistaken in believing that the Russians were once cowardly!
            3. 7gor
              7gor 12 December 2017 06: 22 New
              0
              Frolovna, if you or Assad do not know, then Russians are not fighting in Syria, but Russians!
          2. Xnumx vis
            Xnumx vis 11 December 2017 22: 30 New
            0
            Or from the bay of Sevastopol ..
      2. shura7782
        shura7782 11 December 2017 19: 29 New
        +1
        quote = dsk] Hello Alexander! [quote = shura7782] there is work. [/ quote]
        "Vladimir Vladimirovich noted that"if the terrorists in Syria raise their heads again, we will strike at them such blows that they have not yet seen. "
        Airplanes are not ships, they can return in case of what they can in hours. hi[/ Quote]
        Who could doubt it. Of course, they will not work on empty barrels for them (although they certainly have not yet seen it). Honestly, I’m not sure what he threatened with. [
        1. sabakina
          sabakina 11 December 2017 19: 58 New
          +3
          Quote: shura7782
          Of course, they will not work on empty barrels for them (although they certainly have not yet seen it). Honestly, I’m not sure what he threatened with. [

          I read that during the Second World War, the Luftwaffe was dumped on our empty full of barrels. They said it was very scary from their howling.
          1. Going
            Going 11 December 2017 21: 12 New
            +6
            Vyacheslav hi I don’t know how the Luftwaffe is, but I read that ours did it, because there were simply no bombs.
            1. sabakina
              sabakina 11 December 2017 21: 16 New
              +3
              Victor, anything can be. That was a long time ago. But such a thing really seriously "roars." I haven’t heard it myself, but the Soviet secondary school gives me the right to imagine the physical effects of such a holey barrel.
              1. Going
                Going 11 December 2017 21: 29 New
                +5
                I read that it was not even necessary to make holes, the barrel spinning made sounds from which the blood froze.
                1. sabakina
                  sabakina 11 December 2017 21: 33 New
                  +7
                  Victor, if we reason logically in our conversation, it turns out that the Germans threw holes full of holes, and we without holes. Although not, one hole was a filler neck. Oh, by the way, why our TU-22s will not guess to drop a couple of barrels before dropping the FABs? There is no weight from them, and some would die from a broken heart to the FABs.
                  1. Going
                    Going 11 December 2017 21: 47 New
                    +4
                    Yes, they completely opened one end, then the rotation and wild sounds began, and what about today's events maybe we threw and we just don’t know.
                    1. ver_
                      ver_ 12 December 2017 05: 29 New
                      0
                      ..dyk - and in the stove pipe the wind howls ...
                  2. igorka357
                    igorka357 12 December 2017 02: 59 New
                    0
                    Weights may or may not, but the volume will be occupied by your barrels, decent ..)))
                  3. The comment was deleted.
                  4. shura7782
                    shura7782 13 December 2017 22: 10 New
                    0
                    Quote: sabakina
                    ....... Oh, by the way, why our TU-22s will not guess to drop a couple of barrels before dropping the FABs? .

                    Drive the bomber to such a distance!?. Even for fun, from a height of 7000-8000m, they will be carried away and scattered by the wind to no one knows where. In addition, it is light, as if the effect of a whistle ball in a barrel in an open bomb bay would not work.
            2. jetfors_84
              jetfors_84 12 December 2017 05: 54 New
              0
              Yeah. She also threw sheds at the Germans. wassat
      3. Piramidon
        Piramidon 11 December 2017 20: 30 New
        +1
        Quote: dsk
        Airplanes are not ships, they can return in case of what they can in hours.

        I remember they’ve already taken out once. But, as soon as the barmalei became more active, within a couple of days they returned in double composition.
      4. PalBor
        PalBor 11 December 2017 20: 37 New
        +2
        And how I breathed, how I breathed ... After licking and licking MOKs and VADs, Vladimir Vladimirovich, yes you ... so-so.
        1. igorka357
          igorka357 12 December 2017 03: 00 New
          0
          Where did you get out ..?
    2. Maz
      Maz 11 December 2017 19: 48 New
      0
      Skoko will leave, so much will return
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. 7gor
      7gor 12 December 2017 06: 16 New
      0
      And not a few work left! To them, the remaining good luck, success!
  2. Livonetc
    Livonetc 11 December 2017 19: 08 New
    0
    Will the Syrians leave a bit of technology?
    1. shura7782
      shura7782 11 December 2017 19: 15 New
      0
      This technique will definitely not be left.
      1. Grits
        Grits 12 December 2017 01: 33 New
        +1
        I think that the Su-24 can leave the Syrians. All the same, a decision has already been made to withdraw them from the Air Force. then what reason to drag back?
        1. shura7782
          shura7782 12 December 2017 08: 08 New
          0
          Quote: Gritsa
          I think that the Su-24 can leave the Syrians. All the same, a decision has already been made to withdraw them from the Air Force. then what reason to drag back?

          They will not leave, if only because we ourselves do not have enough of this technique. You noticed that new planes enter the troops for 2-3 pieces per regiment. We received planes in the regiment of squadrons of the same series. Grandfather Su 24 performed his task, is doing it and will still do it perfectly until it is written off.
          1. Valery Saitov
            Valery Saitov 15 December 2017 08: 29 New
            +1
            We continue to purchase, continue to receive it. Factories have reached their design capacity, and today I do not see problems with the supply of equipment. A total of about 140 aircraft and helicopters should enter the VKS this year. Plus, naval aviation, so there are only about 160 units of new equipment. From 1983 to 1990, an average of 175 aircraft were produced each year, of which 110 were military.
    2. skazochnik
      skazochnik 12 December 2017 01: 58 New
      +1
      [quote] [/ quote] What else is Tolik? I know Assad, I know Erdogan, I don’t know Tolik.
      1. iaroslav.mudryi
        iaroslav.mudryi 12 December 2017 16: 01 New
        +3
        Quote: skazochnik
        What else is Tolik? I know Assad, I know Erdogan, I don’t know Tolik.

        laughing drinks laughing drinks laughing drinks
  3. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 11 December 2017 19: 09 New
    +5
    "of which 23 aircraft of various modifications," ////

    Virtually all aircraft? Google pics have never been there
    more than 30 aircraft at a time.
    1. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 11 December 2017 19: 29 New
      11
      Warrior, what are you, how small?))
      1. sabakina
        sabakina 11 December 2017 20: 02 New
        +9
        Sergey, everything is simple here. The warrior takes a smartphone or whatever he says and says: “Oh Kay Google, how many Russian planes are in Syria?” ...
      2. Piramidon
        Piramidon 11 December 2017 20: 34 New
        +3
        Quote: Lord of the Sith
        Warrior, what are you, how small?))

        He is not small, he is a representative of the "promised land." They have long laid eyes on the Syrian lands. They do not wait until we leave. They hope to bomb everything and everything with impunity.
      3. Yuyuka
        Yuyuka 11 December 2017 23: 25 New
        +1
        Quote: Lord of the Sith
        Warrior, what are you, how small?))


        he just doesn’t understand Russian well laughing there is such a purely Russian word "rotation", translated into non-Russian - "withdrawal" (of troops). How many airplanes do we have there? thirty? that means we’ll get somewhere 30-32, let the remaining 33 wassat Russian arithmetic is such, you know, arithmetic hi
    2. kapitan92
      kapitan92 11 December 2017 19: 31 New
      +6
      Quote: voyaka uh
      "of which 23 aircraft of various modifications," ////

      Virtually all aircraft? Google pics have never been there
      more than 30 aircraft at a time.


      According to the RF Ministry of Defense, at certain stages, the base received up to 70 aircraft, including BTA aircraft.
      It is worth noting that the base continues active work on the development of infrastructure and the expansion of its functionality.
    3. Baloo
      Baloo 11 December 2017 20: 20 New
      +4
      Quote: voyaka uh
      "of which 23 aircraft of various modifications," ////

      Virtually all aircraft? Google pics have never been there
      more than 30 aircraft at a time.


      They could not have been there at all if the collective west and the adjoining Israel and Turkey would not have occupied Syria, sponsoring ISIS, without an invitation. :
      Tunisian security officials said one of the main founders of the ISIS terrorist group was an agent of the Israeli Mossad

      and further:
      Tunisian intelligence services have established that Hassan Bin Ali Abdul Salam, nicknamed Abu Abdul Rahman al-Tunisi, was the emir and senior commander of the ISIS terrorist group in Deir ez-Zor, previously served as an Mossad agent.

      al-Tunisi was a resident of Italy suspected of drug trafficking, then went to Sweden and was recruited there by the Israeli national intelligence agency.
      Abu Abdul Rahman al-Tunisi returned to Tunisia in 2012, and then moved to Syria, where he held several posts in the ISIS terrorist group, including the post of ISIS emir in the province of Deir ez-Zor.
      Al-Tunisi tried to escape from the area under ISIS control with a huge amount of money, but was arrested and executed by ISIS.
      The Syrian Permanent Representative to the UN in April told the Security Council that Israel is providing air support to the ISIS terrorist group fighting the Syrian army in Palmyra
      "Israel provided ISIS air support with airstrikes in Palmyra," Bashar al-Jafari said at a meeting of the Security Council on Syria.


      Russia was invited by the legitimate government of Syria to fight the terrorist organization ISIS and others.
    4. Evgeniy667b
      Evgeniy667b 12 December 2017 12: 38 New
      +1
      And dear skaite Warrior wow in Israel, Google images are updated so often? As far as I am in the subject, then each update is a cost, about 15 bucks per square km. Somehow interesting? Once a half year, or even a year, I still understand.
  4. LAWNER
    LAWNER 11 December 2017 19: 09 New
    0
    Hmeimim has already played his part .... But Tartus will be needed for a long time.
  5. Neserg
    Neserg 11 December 2017 19: 10 New
    +3
    Easy way home and good luck.
  6. Sergey Averchenkov
    Sergey Averchenkov 11 December 2017 19: 13 New
    +2
    Up to 70 boards? This is not very much when I served our regiment (three squadrons) - 60 aircraft, two (squadrons) MI-24, one MI-8. I am surprised.
    1. brr1
      brr1 11 December 2017 19: 32 New
      +1
      Up to 70 sides - this is a group that includes sides constantly based on the territory of the Russian Federation (Tu-22m3) and on board the Kuznetsov when he was there
      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 11 December 2017 21: 15 New
        +3
        This, maybe. And at the same time no more than 30 combat aircraft were based at the same time.
        1. Slavin
          Slavin 11 December 2017 23: 49 New
          +1
          30 was enough, or 70, but was it ali enough?
  7. Simon
    Simon 11 December 2017 19: 15 New
    +2
    Well, that - they have completed their work, now forward, to train young people home and train combat pilots experience. wink
  8. Rusland
    Rusland 11 December 2017 19: 18 New
    10
    They are free birds, the decision is political, and the situation is changing, sorry, it didn’t work out, the next time we fly away.
    1. Yuyuka
      Yuyuka 11 December 2017 23: 32 New
      +1
      Quote: Rusland
      They are free birds, the decision is political, and the situation is changing, sorry, it didn’t work out, the next time we fly away.


      for our sworn friends - we have ancient planes - generations somewhere 4 + ---- ++ - + belay we don’t know which one ... we fly only with a fair wind - we’ll blow home, but if suddenly the wind changes, do not blame me ... repeat
  9. Aleksandr21
    Aleksandr21 11 December 2017 19: 22 New
    +2
    I wonder how many aircraft there are .... in October there was information from Senator Franz Klintsevich that there were 34 aircraft on Khmeimin (newspaper source), if the information is reliable, it turns out 34-25 = 9 aircraft will remain.
    1. alexmach
      alexmach 11 December 2017 23: 37 New
      +1
      It’s interesting that they’ll leave it there.
      Several SU-30 or SU-35? In theory, they should also leave a couple of helicopters and attack and transport ones. SU-24 and SU-25 (if any are still there) will probably get everyone out. 12 SU-24 were handed over to the Syrians last year - here they themselves will cope if necessary.

      It is not clear why the sappers and the military police are being taken out. Is their work already finished and then the Syrians themselves? Well, God forbid.
  10. Vitas
    Vitas 11 December 2017 19: 27 New
    +1
    It would be possible to leave doctors and sappers, to help civilians.
  11. Vladimir K.
    Vladimir K. 11 December 2017 19: 31 New
    +1
    Is Putin in a hurry? It is clear that this move has a purely political significance and it is possible to return with interest the flying technique without any pomp for another day. But still - there is still plenty of work for our VKS, and spirits of various stripes can perk up, having decided once again to try the Syrian authorities for a tooth.
    1. PlotnikoffDD
      PlotnikoffDD 11 December 2017 19: 45 New
      +3
      For the first time, are they announcing a withdrawal?
      well, tomorrow some will fly away, and the day after tomorrow others will fly.
      1. Yuyuka
        Yuyuka 11 December 2017 23: 34 New
        0
        Quote: PlotnikoffDD
        For the first time, are they announcing a withdrawal?
        well, tomorrow some will fly away, and the day after tomorrow others will fly.


        good that's why you need to chew? it’s clear - the road, in which case, will take several hours, without traffic jams winked
  12. rudolff
    rudolff 11 December 2017 20: 01 New
    +8
    Cheap populism. Hmeimim and Tartus would have closed quite then and did not pretend to be Macedonian. The Turks and the Americans are in no hurry to get anyone out, but without Russia they will feel much more comfortable.
    1. demo
      demo 11 December 2017 21: 34 New
      +6
      Honestly, I did not understand your skepticism.
      What kind of populism are they talking about?
      Populism was when Putin would have stated that "we have stood where we want, and we will stand, and no one will give a decree." This is populism on the verge of dol ....... isma.
      And here is a different situation.
      The main number of barmalei ditched-kicked out?
      Yes.
      Now what, in the desert, to drive loners on helicopter airplanes?
      Syrian armed forces during the war?
      Snapped up.
      Can they carry out operations on their own?
      They can.
      Why keep the MTR?
      Doctors, sappers and the police - why risk it there?
      And they helped and trained.
      Home. To Russia.
      Not a fan of GDP, but respect.
      Male act. And it doesn’t matter that it arrived not on board No. 1.
      But many of our government were unlikely to have the courage to speak in the open.
    2. Fedya2017
      Fedya2017 11 December 2017 21: 42 New
      0
      Quote: rudolff
      The Turks and the Americans are in no hurry to get anyone out, but without Russia they will feel much more comfortable.

      So let them freely bicker among themselves ... Also with Iran. Another war is brewing in Syria. All the same, Assad himself cannot control his entire former country.
    3. Evgeniy667b
      Evgeniy667b 12 December 2017 12: 47 New
      +1
      You're right rudolff populism and PR at Comrade Supreme are in full swing. And then there are the elections on the nose.
  13. Netzah netzah
    Netzah netzah 11 December 2017 20: 36 New
    +6
    Remind me, this time "the objectives of the operation in Syria have been achieved" and "the Russian troops will be withdrawn in the near future"? I am confused, this is the third or fourth.
    1. Fedya2017
      Fedya2017 11 December 2017 21: 35 New
      +4
      Quote: Netzah Netzah
      I am confused, this is the third or fourth.

      It seems to me that - the third ...
    2. PN
      PN 11 December 2017 21: 54 New
      0
      So then the second. And then in fact the first. There has never been a talk of a complete conclusion, only a large part.
    3. Silkway0026
      Silkway0026 11 December 2017 22: 57 New
      +4
      Quote: Netzah Netzah
      Remind me, this time "the objectives of the operation in Syria have been achieved" and "the Russian troops will be withdrawn in the near future"? I am confused, this is the third or fourth.

      it bites your memory ...
    4. Yuyuka
      Yuyuka 11 December 2017 23: 44 New
      +1
      Quote: Netzah Netzah
      Remind me, this time "the objectives of the operation in Syria have been achieved" and "the Russian troops will be withdrawn in the near future"? I am confused, this is the third or fourth.


      more often you need to go to meetings - you'll be in the knowrepeat some goals are achieved, others appear, some are deduced - as soon as they finish solving their problems, others come. This is the normal situation. The Americans, of course, are stronger than us - they go in with the whole gang and the feast begins, then no one will even remember - why did they come? the main thing is not to leave hi
    5. Baloo
      Baloo 12 December 2017 11: 44 New
      +1
      Quote: Netzah Netzah
      Remind me, this time "the objectives of the operation in Syria have been achieved" and "the Russian troops will be withdrawn in the near future"? I am confused, this is the third or fourth.

      And when will Israel stop interfering in the internal affairs of Syria and sponsor terrorists? Why are you so white and fluffy Arabs hate you?
  14. Fedya2017
    Fedya2017 11 December 2017 21: 34 New
    +5
    Remains about 10 - 15 aircraft and turntables. The Igilovites joyfully announced their offensive on Abu Kemal. This is not counting the fact that expanding its territory in Hama and Idlib ... the Kremlin needs to declare victory before the election. A belligerent lohtorat will guaranteedly vote for the winner ... In general, the decision is right, a more serious war is brewing there. The main goal, because of which Russia entered Syria, has not been achieved. Therefore, it doesn’t matter whether Assad can cope with his Islamists, or end his days as Najibullah in Afghanistan ... Would leave the coastal Alawite territories with our military bases, even under Assad’s rule, at least someone else ... Bomb forever and endlessly The main Sunni population of Syria. for the sake of power over the Alavites, it will not work. Moreover, becoming a monopoly on the supply of our gas to Europe along the Turkish route did not burn out - alas ...
    1. Dwarf with nose
      Dwarf with nose 11 December 2017 21: 49 New
      +1
      I completely agree, the people are already sick of Siri. Now they’ll think of something else
      1. Fedya2017
        Fedya2017 11 December 2017 22: 01 New
        +1
        Quote: Nose dwarf
        from Siri the people are already sick of it. Now they’ll think of something else

        Yes, here they call in Sudan, and in Libya ...
      2. Yuyuka
        Yuyuka 12 December 2017 00: 36 New
        +1
        Quote: Dwarf with a nose
        I completely agree, the people are already sick of Siri. Now they’ll think of something else


        maybe not from Syria, but from the usa? repeat
    2. PN
      PN 11 December 2017 21: 58 New
      0
      What kind of war are we talking about?
      1. Fedya2017
        Fedya2017 11 December 2017 22: 11 New
        +2
        Quote: PN
        What kind of war are we talking about?

        With Iran ... Its consolidation in Syria is like a bone in the throat for Israel-USA. And of course, for neighbors in B. Vostok: the Saudis, Iraq, Qatar, etc., even the Turks do not like it ...
        1. rudolff
          rudolff 11 December 2017 22: 26 New
          +4
          Fedya, a lot depends on where Iran pulls its pipeline from South Pars. If through Syria to Lebanon, wars with Israel and the Sunni kingdoms cannot be avoided. But if instead of the Qatari project through Syria to Turkey ... For such a gesheft, the Turks will kiss the Persians in all places. After all, 8% of the world's gas reserves.
          1. Fedya2017
            Fedya2017 11 December 2017 22: 50 New
            +2
            Quote: rudolff
            a lot depends on where Iran pulls its pipeline from South Pars.

            Yes ... In general, with the pipes and interests of different players, the options are different and confusing ... One thing is clear - Eurogames do not want to depend on the monopoly of gas sellers. They want the Turkish stream to be not one, but connected to others. It is beneficial for them. Russia - not really ...
        2. Shahno
          Shahno 11 December 2017 22: 31 New
          +2
          Don’t worry, Fedya Iran, we’ll collapse our neck without war. They are bold in words.
          1. Fedya2017
            Fedya2017 11 December 2017 22: 53 New
            +1
            Quote: Shahno
            Don’t worry, Fedya Iran, we’ll collapse our neck without war. They are bold in words.

            Yes to health! Of course, without war at all - this is unlikely ... But, good luck! There will be less competitor for Russia, this is good.
        3. LiSiCyn
          LiSiCyn 11 December 2017 22: 33 New
          +2
          And who will fight with Iran? Especially interesting to hear about the "first rows"?
          1. Fedya2017
            Fedya2017 11 December 2017 23: 10 New
            +2
            Quote: LiSiCyn
            And who will fight with Iran? Especially interesting to hear about the "first rows"?

            In the first case, it is enough to knock Iran out of Syria. After this, the Persians will hold their tail for a long time ... Here are the cards in the hands of the USA and Israel. Although everything can be trickier ... For example, the monarchies of B. Vostok will do this, for them, the advance of Iran is dangerous. And we need to stand aside ... No wonder the old man, the king of Saudi, was lugging into the Kremlin, backstage plans can be understood only by the subsequent actions of the players ...
            1. LiSiCyn
              LiSiCyn 12 December 2017 01: 12 New
              +1
              How will they kick Iran out of Syria? To bomb? So the S-400, until it displays ... Ground operation? So the fighters ended ... And our head of state said that if, what ......, as I have never seen ..... wink I'm talking about militants laughing
              1. Fedya2017
                Fedya2017 12 December 2017 17: 50 New
                0
                Quote: LiSiCyn
                I'm talking about militants

                And Putin-about the militants ... Not about Israel and the United States. And the S-400 is not in business here, they will not give a command from the Kremlin, as they did not give for the entire time of the Syrian operation.
  15. Lexus
    Lexus 11 December 2017 21: 45 New
    +1
    But still interesting: what about the Kurds, Idlib and At-Tanf? Will the “partners" perceive this move as a weakness? And, if so, who will prevent the “infection” from creeping out of training camps under their “umbrella” again? Do not judge strictly, because we were so often betrayed.
    1. Fedya2017
      Fedya2017 11 December 2017 23: 25 New
      0
      Quote: lexus
      Will the “partners" perceive this move as a weakness? And, if so, who will prevent the “infection” from creeping out of training camps under their “umbrella” again? Do not judge strictly, because we were so often betrayed.

      They will not perceive ... On the contrary, they will be annoyed. They expected to drag us into the new Afghan version for many years and without a prospect of success. And they themselves only wanted to throw firewood from the side. Now they will have to disassemble themselves what they brewed ... How they climbed into Afghanistan after us for joy, or "defeated" Saddam quickly in Iraq. Now they don’t know how to get out, so as to eat a fish and ... to sit on a Christmas tree with an ass.
      1. Lexus
        Lexus 11 December 2017 23: 41 New
        +2
        On the contrary, they will be annoyed

        But do not underestimate them. In Afghanistan, they built ONE school all the time, pump oil from Iraq (if you do not believe me, you can find the main Iraqi oil operators and their turnover on the Internet). There was also Libya - so there only assets were "frozen" by $ 150 billion, and oil and gas are pumped to this day. Victims of their aggression pay for their wars, and indeed the whole world. Do not look at the waste. All their expenses - the purchase of weapons from their own defense industry and military salaries - everything will be returned to the budget in the form of taxes.
        Now they don’t know how to get out

        They are not chosen because it is profitable (see above), and because these hotbeds of tension are not near at hand (Mexico and Canada), but ours.
        1. Fedya2017
          Fedya2017 12 December 2017 18: 04 New
          0
          Quote: lexus
          They are not selected because it is profitable (see above)

          No. Not profitable ... They have to keep their armed forces in Afghanistan and Iraq to support local authorities in these countries. Otherwise, local Islamists such as the Taliban and al-Qaeda would have overthrown this power long ago. We have to bear considerable costs. pouring money in support of pro-American regimes in Afghanistan and Iraq ... And losses in their troops, people and equipment. It is worth leaving from there, the regimes planted by amers to power will fall, and all costs will be in vain ... Then oil and other resources will already be pumped - others. For example, China, Iran ... The same Russia. The bewitched circle, and the Americans created it themselves ...
          1. Lexus
            Lexus 12 December 2017 20: 40 New
            +2
            Thank you for your persistence in defending your point of view. Good! If you are not expelled from the forum), I will propose to the public a series of articles on this topic. I hope for your participation in the discussion.
            1. Fedya2017
              Fedya2017 12 December 2017 22: 01 New
              0
              Quote: lexus
              I hope for your participation in the discussion.

              And thank you to me. Be sure to take part in the discussion. Write!
  16. Medalist
    Medalist 11 December 2017 22: 36 New
    +4
    Quote: Fedya2017
    Yes, here they call in Sudan, and in Libya ...

    I dare to suggest just such a development of events:
    1.Airplanes from Syria will fly to Egypt
    2. The operation to restore order in Libya from the territory of the ARE will begin
    3. After defeating the enemy in Libya, the Russian Federation will receive bases there for the fleet and aviation with an eye on Gibraltar
    4. In Sudan, they will create a missile base + VKS group will be deployed in Hurghada, so "close the Red Sea" and KSA
    5. Bases in Syria, Egypt and Sudan will allow you to take Israel into ticks and prevent NATO forces from entering the Suez Canal in the event of an attack on Iran.
    ... it’s just that there wouldn’t be a “gut” during a special operation to eliminate the 5th column inside the very top of the Russian Federation
    1. LiSiCyn
      LiSiCyn 11 December 2017 22: 56 New
      +1
      And do we need it? Who will conduct the operation?
      Quote: Medalist
      NATO forces to the Suez Canal in the event of an attack on Iran.

      It is especially interesting who in the forefront will go?
    2. Fedya2017
      Fedya2017 11 December 2017 23: 01 New
      +2
      Quote: Medalist
      I dare to suggest just such a development of events:

      Assumptions deserve attention. Except for the last paragraph ... The current Kremlin "slaves in the galleys" with Israel have a mutual warm relationship. Even love ...
  17. Netzah netzah
    Netzah netzah 11 December 2017 23: 06 New
    +4
    Quote: Medalist
    Quote: Fedya2017
    Yes, here they call in Sudan, and in Libya ...

    I dare to suggest just such a development of events:
    1.Airplanes from Syria will fly to Egypt
    2. The operation to restore order in Libya from the territory of the ARE will begin
    3. After defeating the enemy in Libya, the Russian Federation will receive bases there for the fleet and aviation with an eye on Gibraltar
    4. In Sudan, they will create a missile base + VKS group will be deployed in Hurghada, so "close the Red Sea" and KSA
    5. Bases in Syria, Egypt and Sudan will allow you to take Israel into ticks and prevent NATO forces from entering the Suez Canal in the event of an attack on Iran.
    ... it’s just that there wouldn’t be a “gut” during a special operation to eliminate the 5th column inside the very top of the Russian Federation

    The cotton mary of the sapraўdnag of the vybart Rygorych ... Khlopchyk, the taba yakaya on the right and ours blіzhnyaўshodnіh podzey? But what about tabad so spadabayutstsa susedzі shto you zgodzen gіnuts at their geapalіtychnyh gulnyah?
  18. Netzah netzah
    Netzah netzah 11 December 2017 23: 08 New
    +3
    Quote: PN
    So then the second. And then in fact the first. There has never been a talk of a complete conclusion, only a large part.

    Not, all the same, the third. In March and December 2016 they "deduced".
  19. Zeev Zeev
    Zeev Zeev 12 December 2017 00: 37 New
    +1
    Quote: Netzah Netzah
    Remind me, this time "the objectives of the operation in Syria have been achieved" and "the Russian troops will be withdrawn in the near future"? I am confused, this is the third or fourth.

    The third
  20. aiden
    aiden 12 December 2017 01: 37 New
    +3
    I look here in the comments of the God-chosen and our National Bolsheviks farts tears are not childish. So do it right
  21. BVS
    BVS 12 December 2017 02: 10 New
    +1
    Quote: Vitas
    It would be possible to leave doctors and sappers, to help civilians.

    Is Syria ONE military hospital of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation?
  22. Nikolay R-PM
    Nikolay R-PM 12 December 2017 06: 10 New
    0
    Mi-28, mi-35m, mi-8, lone ka-31sv, the remaining ka-52 remain? That's for sure army aviation - it’s better to be a friend of a motorized infantry, tanker, etc.) I wonder why a couple of 52nds are gone? Still curious in what way they are led away - by sea or transport aircraft? If transport, it is inquisitive to see the volume of disassembly of helicopters before loading.
  23. Themi30
    Themi30 12 December 2017 15: 49 New
    0
    Quote: 7gor
    Frolovna, if you or Assad do not know, then Russians are not fighting in Syria, but Russians!

    Strange, the dead whose names I saw were Russians. Something in your statement is wrong.
  24. Valery Saitov
    Valery Saitov 15 December 2017 08: 04 New
    0
    70-25 = 45 aircraft is enough to control the entire territory of Syria.