Military Review

The Boomerang platform has developed a whole family of specialized machines.

44
In the coming years, a unified combat platform will appear in Russia. In preparation for adopting the Boomerang armored personnel carrier, the industry developed on their base a family of specialized vehicles - anti-tank, air defense, communications, electronic warfare, command and control, sanitary and repair and evacuation, report News.


The Boomerang platform has developed a whole family of specialized machines.


There will be all the cars that will accompany the Boomerang BTR in combat,
Alexander Krasovitsky, Director General of the Military Industrial Company, told the newspaper.

According to him, work on the platform is progressing well, despite the use of a large number of new technologies and components. He added that "the platform shows itself well in tests, and manufacturers are ready to make any number of vehicles that the military will order."

The wheeled armored personnel carriers "Boomerang" are the combat vehicles of the new generation, which use modern technologies, including ceramic armor and uninhabited combat modules.

“However, armored personnel carriers are not fighting alone. We need cars for transporting the command, taking out the wounded, evacuating damaged equipment from the battlefield, and fighting aviation adversary and tanks. Therefore, for placement on the Boomerang wheeled chassis, interchangeable warheads have been developed. This will allow changing the functionality of combat vehicles depending on the situation, ”the material says.

Also for the first time in stories Russian armed forces will create brigades and divisions that will be completely unified. This has so far been achieved only by the Americans, who had brigades based on the Stryker BTR in 2000-s.

As noted by military expert Alexey Khlopotov, the unification of the platform will significantly reduce the cost of production.

It is much easier to produce one chassis and put different modules on it than to make bodies and machines for different tasks. In addition, repair is greatly simplified. A module or chassis damaged in a battle can be replaced at no extra cost,
said the expert.

More efficient use of machines opens up the possibility of replacing one module with another, depending on the tasks being solved.

For example, in some conflicts, cars with air defense functionality are not needed, but repair-evacuation or sanitary vehicles, on the contrary, are required in greater numbers. The modular scheme allows you to quickly adapt,
explained Khlopotov.
Photos used:
www.arms-expo.ru/rusplt.ru
44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Teberii
    Teberii 11 December 2017 12: 03 New
    0
    Logically, let's see what happens.
    1. ProkletyiPirat
      ProkletyiPirat 11 December 2017 12: 14 New
      +1
      I still suspect that I got a mobile house on chicken legs, unable to act on the roads, because the legs are weak.
      1. cariperpaint
        cariperpaint 11 December 2017 12: 24 New
        +4
        uh no. this turtle K17 crawls very well. even with a reserve. About Kurgan I generally am silent. he even tested the autoreview rushed around the training ground like crazy)
        1. ProkletyiPirat
          ProkletyiPirat 11 December 2017 12: 31 New
          0
          crawls well at a height of three meters, a nose congestion and an overestimated center of gravity? I DO NOT BELIEVE! I’ll see a video of overcoming obstacles with simultaneous shooting, then I’ll believe ...
          1. cariperpaint
            cariperpaint 11 December 2017 13: 55 New
            +1
            and how did you determine the center of gravity of the machine?))) I’ll say this turns into turns remarkably) I have a Kruzak and then heels more)
            1. ProkletyiPirat
              ProkletyiPirat 11 December 2017 21: 34 New
              0
              Kruzak is a civilian car? or a truck of the Kremenchug plant? Do you have it 3m high? where is the center of gravity? How much higher is the suspension line? what mass is above this center? What mass is above the suspension line?
              ps I still suspect that the masses will be seriously different ...
      2. Petr1968
        Petr1968 11 December 2017 13: 18 New
        0
        In vain you are so weak.
      3. NEXUS
        NEXUS 11 December 2017 23: 01 New
        +5
        Quote: ProkletyiPirat
        I still suspect that I got a mobile house on chicken legs, unable to act on the roads, because the legs are weak.

        In vain you are so ... take a look yourself wassat

        HOLIDAY FIRE! wassat
  2. assa67
    assa67 11 December 2017 12: 08 New
    +5
    Is preparation for reinforcing the created "light infantry" in progress? .... we will see ...
  3. svp67
    svp67 11 December 2017 12: 11 New
    +2
    family of specialized vehicles - anti-tank, air defense, communications, electronic warfare, command post, sanitary and repair-evacuation
    I didn’t find in the lists self-propelled guns, other artillery support vehicles (which is not a replacement for MTLB-U) and BRM, I’m somewhat surprised ....
  4. Alexey RA
    Alexey RA 11 December 2017 12: 19 New
    +8
    For example, in some conflicts, cars with air defense functionality are not needed, but repair-evacuation or sanitary vehicles, on the contrary, are required in greater numbers. The modular scheme allows you to quickly adapt,

    Will the crews be modular too? He took out a "air defense" memory card from his brain, inserted a "medic" or a "repairman" - and forward? smile
    For some reason, all fans of modularity forget that the modules themselves do not work. And each of them needs a trained crew.
    1. Albert1988
      Albert1988 11 December 2017 22: 05 New
      +2
      Quote: Alexey RA
      For some reason, all fans of modularity forget that the modules themselves do not work. And each of them needs a trained crew.

      And how then do modern machines with different tasks work? So do not talk nonsense - everything will be as usual - for each machine there will be a crew, modularity - this is only for the sake of cheaper production and easier maintenance.
      1. ProkletyiPirat
        ProkletyiPirat 11 December 2017 22: 40 New
        +1
        Quote: Albert1988
        modularity is only for the sake of cheaper production and easier maintenance.

        just some "experts", "ANALYTICS", "military" and civilians forget about it and begin to modulate everything for the sake of modularity :) And as a result we get a problem ..
        1. Albert1988
          Albert1988 11 December 2017 22: 53 New
          0
          Well, I think that all the same, one should not take into account the opinion of all "ikspertof" there and generals of armored troops ...
          1. ProkletyiPirat
            ProkletyiPirat 11 December 2017 23: 02 New
            +1
            The problem is that there are three types of experts, couch, salary and judicial. There is no difference between the first and second.
            1. BMP-2
              BMP-2 12 December 2017 03: 15 New
              +2
              As practice shows, there is no difference between the second and third!
    2. insular
      insular 11 December 2017 23: 30 New
      +1
      Quote: Alexey RA
      Will the crews be modular too? He took out a "air defense" memory card from his brain, inserted a "medic" or a "repairman" - and forward?

      Landing the landing of the corresponding crew is a much faster and easier process than replacing the module.
      Quote: Alexey RA
      For some reason, all fans of modularity forget that the modules themselves do not work.

      For some reason, people who do not even imagine that there is a modular design, imagine this is something similar to replacing a car wheel.
  5. tchoni
    tchoni 11 December 2017 12: 24 New
    0
    The same is news to me. How much about the "boomerang" screaming - so much about the line of cars and remember.
    It remains a little - to wait for the first fully unified division on the "boomerang"
  6. cannabis
    cannabis 11 December 2017 12: 27 New
    +3
    At first there was Stryker ...... after 17 years, the BTR-4 and Boomerang appeared in the Slavs. Copy again? First, jeans, then chewing gum, then pluralism, then democracy and a military uniform with a hundred badges and stripes. Now the tactics and technique. And who are we learning from? Those who have never defeated anyone in open battle, the descendants of bandits and thieves who fled from Europe.
    1. Albert1988
      Albert1988 11 December 2017 22: 06 New
      0
      And you do not admit that the trivial conditions on the battlefield have changed a little, and our equipment. designed at the latest in the early 80s no longer corresponds to time?
      1. cannabis
        cannabis 11 December 2017 22: 11 New
        +1
        I allowed this 30 years ago when I served on this technique. I had to look for new tactics with the officers, because Marders and Bradley were able to destroy our infantry fighting vehicles from a distance of 2 km, and we only from 500 meters. So with Boomerang we were very late.
        1. Albert1988
          Albert1988 11 December 2017 22: 55 New
          0
          Quote: cunning
          I allowed this 30 years ago when I served on this technique. I had to look for new tactics with the officers, because Marders and Bradley were able to destroy our infantry fighting vehicles from a distance of 2 km, and we only from 500 meters. So with Boomerang we were very late.

          That's it, and some people still question the necessity and expediency of creating machines of the Armata / Kurgan / Boomerang lines - yes, we need them like air!
          1. cannabis
            cannabis 11 December 2017 23: 05 New
            +1
            To understand what kind of equipment we need, we must understand what kind of war they will impose on us. Stalin's generals drove 12 and a half thousand tanks to the border, and threw them there. Whether intentionally or not, this is a separate conversation. They, as they tell us, were also preparing to defend their homeland. So you need to have something that can be used in defense and offensive.
            1. insular
              insular 11 December 2017 23: 35 New
              +2
              Quote: cunning
              To understand what kind of equipment we need, we must understand what kind of war they will impose on us.

              "War Never Changes" (C) laughing
              Quote: cunning
              Stalin's generals drove 12 and a half thousand tanks to the border, and threw them there. Whether intentionally or not, this is a separate conversation

              And what does the technique have to do with it?
            2. Albert1988
              Albert1988 11 December 2017 23: 58 New
              +2
              Quote: cunning
              To understand what kind of equipment we need, we must understand what kind of war they will impose on us. Stalin's generals drove 12 and a half thousand tanks to the border, and threw them there. Whether intentionally or not, this is a separate conversation. They, as they tell us, were also preparing to defend their homeland. So you need to have something that can be used in defense and offensive.

              So the fact of the matter is that in modern realities it is unlikely that we will advance with tanks “to Berlin” - we will plow all of Berlin from a decent distance with all kinds of calibers and X-101s, and then we will add iskander prophylactically. So we will need all kinds of BTT more for defense than for dashing tank attacks.
              As for the "Stalin generals" - these very tanks, which they "drove" (in fact, did not drive and not to the border, but this is a separate issue) could both advance and defend - they fully corresponded to the requirements of the time, it was all about proper use ... or non-application ...
              1. cannabis
                cannabis 12 December 2017 00: 08 New
                +3
                Like brains, the people are "powdered" with Caliber, Iskander. Babi kitchen chatter. Tired.
                1. Albert1988
                  Albert1988 12 December 2017 19: 45 New
                  +1
                  Quote: cunning
                  Like brains, the people are "powdered" with Caliber, Iskander. Babi kitchen chatter. Tired.

                  Oh yeah! Well, well - then tell me, what then is NOT a chatter? What then is NOT powdered brains?
                  I bring to your attention that now is NOT the Second World War, and large countries will fight not with tanks, not guns, but with cruise and ballistic missiles across half the world ...
                  1. cannabis
                    cannabis 13 December 2017 08: 55 New
                    0
                    I bring to YOUR attention that our Caliber is capable of delivering a small explosive charge to the enemy, well, even if it’s 500 kilograms. It turns out that this is a simple bomb or four bags of explosives in a car. Or do you want a nuclear won? Do you have a gas mask and a white sheet?
                    1. Albert1988
                      Albert1988 13 December 2017 21: 38 New
                      +1
                      In this case, I bring to YOUR HIS information that now super-mega huge ammunition is not needed to hit targets - high-precision weapons, despite all the electronic warfare, remain extremely effective. One missile missed - the second does not miss. So it is not necessary to distribute everything within a radius of tens of meters if the same iskander calmly gets into the window. Wake up and sing - the 21st century in the yard - in the global war I will steer aviation and the KR / BR, and tanks and other armored combat vehicles will clean up everything that planes with missiles have not finished off.
                      Quote: cunning
                      Or do you want a nuclear won? Do you have a gas mask and a white sheet?

                      But it is precisely the presence on all possible parties to the conflict of vast arsenals of nuclear weapons with the simultaneous impossibility of creating any kind of effective global missile defense system, which makes direct war between the leading powers impossible - no one wants to cover themselves with the same white sheet))) Therefore, the war will be indirect, territories of third countries, as was the case in Georgia in 2008, then in Syria and Ukraine. But for such local conflicts we just need maybe not such a mobile, but very well-protected military equipment, like the same boomerangs, Kurganians and Almaty hi
                      1. cannabis
                        cannabis 13 December 2017 23: 46 New
                        +1
                        Have you ever seen the live operation of ultra-precise munitions? I saw shooting with a laser illuminated target. Enough for me. And about the "getting into the window" ett you turned up a lot, laughed a little. Now about the new reinforcing boomerang iron. Did you have to operate, organize maintenance, repair, evacuation of armored vehicles? Do you know what hard labor it is even in peacetime? And the more so in the military. Previously, each division had its own repair and restoration battalion with a bunch of equipment and machine tools. In the districts there were repair factories, but several. Where are these plants and where are those divisions and who will cook, rivet and tame the damaged Armats and Boomerangs during the fighting? You do not know and did not think about it? And this is an element of the country's security. And who said that the war will be in the territory of 3 or 4 countries? Or did you come up with it yourself? There is already a war on the land of Russia. I do not divide Russia into Ukraine, Belarus and Rasea, it is one country and one people, just different tribes of this people, who are fooled by their rulers, are playing their games so far. But the rulers come and go, and the people live forever.
                      2. ProkletyiPirat
                        ProkletyiPirat 14 December 2017 04: 06 New
                        +1
                        I am amused by situations where supporters of different concepts argue. No analytics. Well, for example konoprava you scold new equipment while arguing this is the lack of repair capacity. How is one related to the other? Yes, no matter how, the same lack of capacity does not make other equipment more maintainable! At the same time, I completely agree with you that the new platforms are not very in terms of field repair, and yes, you can do better. But spending resources on repair facilities in every corner is useless, because this is what the adversary is trying to do, so that we waste resources and slow down our development in other areas. This actually happened with the USSR which the United States defeated in the economic war (yes, the war was not only on the economic front, I am aware). Yes, here, too, there is a way out, so that you can climb onto the tree and don’t prick ***. Only those who can, know and know how can never get in touch with each other and do useful work for the state.
                        Or here you are Albert1988, I agree with you that in modern warfare aviation and the Kyrgyz Republic \ BR, but, you understand that you can’t cover everything with them, and it’s not even their cost, nor their cost-effectiveness ratio. Everything is much more commonplace modern electronics cannot be stored for a long time, the more perfect electronics, the less technical process in it, the less technical process, the faster electronics are destroyed by diffusion of materials. It turns out that we cannot store ammunition for decades, that is, we cannot create a reserve of ammunition in case of war, and we cannot make a reserve of production capacities due to the presence of high-precision weapons on the enemy, because with the mass launch of the KR / BR, the plant will be guaranteed to be destroyed .. Yes, and the very Kurgan, boomerangs and armats, they are still a continuation of the "technique created for the classic war", just in comparison with t72 \ bmp3 \ bt80, etc. This new technology is at a higher technological level. it will be destroyed in exactly the same way by the asymmetric method. In modern warfare, a technique is needed that performs the same tasks but with other methods that are more effective, but this effectiveness must not be measured by the methods of classical warfare.
            3. ProkletyiPirat
              ProkletyiPirat 12 December 2017 00: 43 New
              +2
              Quote: cunning
              we must understand what kind of war they will impose on us.

              Any war can be imposed. Generally ANY including a mixture of global and economic. BECAUSE it is not necessary to predict wars, but to modernize the equipment and army structure, and in order to do this with the least expenditure of resources, it is necessary to conduct analytics, and for analytics, we need an analytical information environment in which analysts will work with their analytical calculations, and receive for their calculations money, in amounts directly dependent on the completeness and usefulness of the calculations ...
              1. cannabis
                cannabis 13 December 2017 08: 50 New
                0
                Thank you for calling my forecast the work of analysts. I did not know the word.
                1. ProkletyiPirat
                  ProkletyiPirat 13 December 2017 10: 18 New
                  +1
                  Well, I would not call it analytics, But it is certainly a predicate, more precisely, several predicates connected by a logical connection. So it can be called an analytical calculation, even if it is useless from a practical point of view. hi
                  1. cannabis
                    cannabis 13 December 2017 10: 29 New
                    0
                    "Predicate", logic, analytics, information environment, resource costs - a lot of verbal manure, meaningless and tiring. The main thing, as I understand it, is all the money that you can demand for this dung.
                    1. ProkletyiPirat
                      ProkletyiPirat 13 December 2017 16: 57 New
                      +1
                      The main thing is the opportunity to get a percentage of what others can save and earn. This is the world of capitalism wink
    2. Ratmir_Ryazan
      Ratmir_Ryazan 11 December 2017 22: 12 New
      +1
      What are you talking about? They have been producing the striker since 2003, and in Russia wheeled armored personnel carriers appeared almost immediately when the Second World War ended ... The Boomerang is our new armored personnel carrier, on a new platform ...
    3. insular
      insular 11 December 2017 23: 33 New
      +1
      Quote: cunning
      First was Stryker

      And Stryker why copied?
      1. cannabis
        cannabis 11 December 2017 23: 37 New
        +1
        The ancestor of the family was a German 8-wheeled reconnaissance vehicle. You can find out its name on the Internet.
        1. insular
          insular 11 December 2017 23: 47 New
          +1
          Quote: cunning
          The ancestor of the family was a German 8-wheeled reconnaissance vehicle

          The ancestor was horse drawn cart transport.

          Well then laugh? Well, what kind of intelligence?
          Should we write about an armored combat vehicle? Which has a task circle - delivery and evacuation of personnel and materiel!
          Historically, this type of equipment, like all others, comes from the First World War, where a conveyor tank was used.
          1. cannabis
            cannabis 11 December 2017 23: 51 New
            +1
            Demagogy and chatter.
            1. insular
              insular 11 December 2017 23: 59 New
              +2
              Quote: cunning
              Demagogy and chatter.

              Demagogy and chatter is much better than feverish nonsense about Stryker and copying from it
  7. Sergey53
    Sergey53 11 December 2017 14: 13 New
    +5
    The fact that a whole line of special vehicles has been developed is really wonderful. The main thing is that they never remain on paper, or do not seem unnecessary to someone. As for many years with a BMPT they were dancing, for example.
  8. Ratmir_Ryazan
    Ratmir_Ryazan 11 December 2017 22: 08 New
    +1
    Good handsome !!! 30 mm cannon, multi-channel sight, armor, reinforced bottom ... Oh, he would have DZ and KAZ he would have been an armored personnel carrier of the 21st century ....