US airspace in Syria! The Ministry of Defense commented on the statement of the Pentagon

249
The Russian Defense Ministry reacted to the statements of the Pentagon that the United States allegedly has airspace in Syria, reports RT.

Major General Igor Konashenkov commented on the words of the representative of the Central Command of the US Armed Forces, Damien Picart, who said that the Russian HVAC allegedly allowed dangerous rapprochement with American aircraft in Syria, entering "our airspace east of the Euphrates."



US airspace in Syria! The Ministry of Defense commented on the statement of the Pentagon


Statements by representatives of the US Army that a part of the airspace that belongs to the United States exists in Syria is bewildering. Unlike the Russian Aerospace Forces, aviation The US-led “international coalition” acts illegally in Syria. Pentagon representatives should remember that Syria is a sovereign state and a member of the UN, therefore, the United States did not and cannot have any “own” sky here
- it is spoken in the message of the Ministry of Defense, arrived in RT.

The department also noted that most of the convergences of Russian and American aircraft in the Euphrates River valley were associated with attempts by US aircraft to interfere with the destruction of IG terrorists *.

It is noted that the X-NUMX of November in the airspace above the western coast of the Euphrates, the American F-23 fighter, actively prevented the Russian pair of Su-22 attack aircraft from carrying out the combat mission to destroy the IG strongpoint in the suburb of Al-Mayadin.

The F-22 aircraft shot off heat traps and released brake flaps with constant maneuvering, simulating an air battle. After the appearance of the Russian Su-35 multifunctional super-maneuverable fighter, the American fighter stopped dangerous maneuvers and hurried off to Iraqi airspace.
- clarified in the department.

In addition, the agency advised "individual representatives of the central command of the US armed forces recommend filtering thoughts and focusing on the destruction of ISIL terrorists in Iraq, rather than provoking incidents in the air."
  • Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

249 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. GRF
    +16
    9 December 2017 16: 09
    And the king is naked! )
    1. +26
      9 December 2017 16: 11
      Quote: GRF
      And the king is naked! )

      Well done our guys and there is nothing to let them go there! They have nothing to protect their barmaley!
      1. +40
        9 December 2017 16: 17
        Quote: volodya
        Well done our guys and there is nothing to let them go there!

        Where not to let? They are already there. And somehow they didn’t really kick them out, so I disagree with the "well done".
        1. +19
          9 December 2017 16: 32
          Maybe it's time to take our "concern" beyond the news in our media? Claims in international courts, requirements in the UN and other international organizations? Maybe it's time to really act on the territory of the enemy? That we will not have money to hire sensible lawyers to protect our reputation?
          1. +17
            9 December 2017 16: 45
            About that and speech. Even if this moment is positive, the situation as a whole is clearly negative. The United States is unlimited with impunity, and there is no end in sight.
            1. +18
              9 December 2017 17: 00
              Quote: User
              The United States is unlimited with impunity, and there is no end in sight.

              But do not we bring down arrogance well, from love?
              Under the guise of stealth - A new genre.
              The main thing is always excuse - they are invisible. Well, missed, that we take backward, except for the snow
              1. +14
                9 December 2017 21: 58
                By the way, it’s a great idea to shoot down the “invisible” F-22 at night, and blamelessly declare that “we didn’t notice it” for accusations or claims. good
                1. +14
                  10 December 2017 02: 49
                  And bring down on the basis of what? That they illegally fly? Then only Syrians can shoot down, not us. They have every right. But only the Syrians will not do this, because the Americans will then roll Syria into a cake, despite our concern. Shayrat proved it. So do not bravura marches. Pin .... until ....... no one will pick up the Stanzas from there, even ours. Until they blame themselves. But for this, just unbearable conditions must be arranged. Leisurely.
                  1. +5
                    10 December 2017 05: 26
                    Quote: Gritsa
                    And bring down on the basis of what?

                    As always, based on the report of the radar operator: “The target is fast, it does not respond to the request” hi
                    1. +1
                      10 December 2017 10: 30
                      Yeah. Right now. Who will take responsibility for this?
                      1. +1
                        10 December 2017 10: 34
                        Quote: notingem
                        Yeah. Right now. Who will take responsibility for this?

                        And since when are we forbidden to shoot down UFOs if they are not aliens?
                      2. +6
                        10 December 2017 10: 53
                        In Russia, officials take bribes in dollars and right now you shy away. Who will allow you? By the way, property and children over the hill should also be taken into account.
                  2. The comment was deleted.
                2. +6
                  10 December 2017 11: 01
                  No matter how we were shot down! It looks like the Defense Ministry has not learned anything! Sent attack aircraft without fighter cover! immediately faded as our drying appeared, but if it was originally there, the fighters understood each other and the attack aircraft worked
            2. +1
              10 December 2017 03: 28
              It seems that they (the USA) in such an ugly affair as managing on an unauthorized territory are guided by affiliation with the UN and the "right of the strong."
              Of course, it is necessary to develop the legal levers of counteraction (for the struggle at the UN), because the "right of the strong" with their military potential and budget is on their side.
          2. +11
            9 December 2017 16: 53
            UN headquarters where is it located? Accordingly, that country dictates its will, restricting the rights of some and not limiting its own. But the UN only states the facts and is concerned.
          3. +9
            9 December 2017 16: 56
            Quote: Maksus
            Maybe it's time to take our "concern" beyond the news in our media? Claims in international courts, requirements in the UN and other international organizations? Maybe it's time to really act on the territory of the enemy? That we will not have money to hire sensible lawyers to protect our reputation?

            what for? maybe it’s worth giving ears to violators of the airspace of a sovereign state.
            especially since
            Quote: Maksus
            "... Unlike the Russian Aerospace Forces, US-led “international coalition” aviation acts illegally in Syria..."
            1. +5
              9 December 2017 18: 38
              In the face in return are not afraid to receive?
              1. +23
                9 December 2017 18: 47
                Quote: a.sirin
                In the face in return are not afraid to receive?

                if we continue to be afraid to get a response, then they will be ... scumbag. It’s worth giving it over the ears, and already opponents will be afraid to get a response.
                such is my "yard policy" request
                hi
                1. +5
                  9 December 2017 19: 05
                  The policy is practical ... And now let’s imagine that the US Air Force pilots didn’t read (or forgot) about the fact that they are cowards, and the “Reptor” - and they gave the Su-35, Su-25 lyuley and, again, to the park - flying behind some horseradish Tu-22M3 (4-5-6)
                  Then what?
                  1. +14
                    9 December 2017 20: 01
                    Quote: a.sirin
                    Then what?

                    because they do not read topwar "Caliber" (because they read only GLONASS digits and digital maps of the area), due to a technical problem, they suddenly deviate from the camp of barmalei and fall into the camp of similar barmalei, but under a star-striped flag ... further options are possible ...
                    the times of undivided US power in the world are slowly leaving
                    1. +2
                      10 December 2017 17: 57
                      The tomahawks fly further
                  2. SOF
                    +8
                    9 December 2017 20: 08
                    . Then what

                    ... another "rookie" of the Maidan hundreds, recruited on the eve of the election?
                    1. +4
                      9 December 2017 22: 44
                      Quote: SOF
                      . Then what

                      ... another "rookie" of the Maidan hundreds, recruited on the eve of the election?

                      They have been here for a long time and most of them are hiding under the Russian flag, our Russian singers have settled in here too, their work will begin soon (elections on the nose), they do not understand what to eat in their hands, which is bad.
                      1. The comment was deleted.
                    2. +2
                      10 December 2017 16: 25
                      In 58 they do not recruit - we already began to think
                  3. +4
                    9 December 2017 22: 29
                    Quote: a.sirin
                    Then what?

                    Nuclear war ... and may the strongest win - the magnificent Olympic principle.
                    1. +5
                      10 December 2017 04: 18
                      There will be no nuclear war. For in it the owners of the Fed will lose the most. Their losses are PARADISE LIFE and ABSOLUTE POWER over the world. No one else has big bets. So if you escalate to a nuclear war, then the owners of the Fed will merge and make concessions (the Caribbean crisis and the situation with the DPRK).
                    2. +2
                      10 December 2017 16: 27
                      Oil painting:
                      olympiad, competition of hammer throwers and archery ... throwing team: 100% of hits ...
                      archer team: 100% hits ...
                      Everyone died ... Olympics, damn it
                  4. The comment was deleted.
                  5. +6
                    10 December 2017 00: 10
                    And then make a mistake, accidentally, with the airfield, well, to confuse him with the base of the barmalei, and unload the whole load, as they were in the 50s, made a mistake. Of course, apologize, and it is significant to punish the “commander” with an apartment or even an entire estate!
                  6. +6
                    10 December 2017 02: 12
                    Quote: a.sirin
                    and gave the Lyuli Su-35,

                    and if, when trying to give us lyuley, the SU-35 will give lyuley itself .... where are you going to do this ??? wassat wassat wassat laughing laughing laughing
                    1. +1
                      10 December 2017 02: 58
                      Also an option. But the Fu-22 is a very good airplane and the Su-35 will have to butt heavily with it. We don’t take Tu-22 and Su-25 into account, they will be babies in this fight.
                      1. +7
                        10 December 2017 03: 14
                        Quote: Gritsa
                        But fu-22 very good airplane

                        what what what who said that ... isn't it the pilot who drifted from the SU-35 ??? wassat laughing laughing laughing
                    2. +1
                      10 December 2017 16: 31
                      It must be understood that the United States will not respond with a tomato blockade - do you understand this or not?
                      It's not about the results of ONE battle (although here I have doubts about the result you described) - it's about the WAR,
                      1. +1
                        10 December 2017 16: 45
                        Quote: a.sirin
                        It must be understood that the United States will not respond with a tomato blockade - do you understand this or not?
                        It's not about the results of ONE battle (although here I have doubts about the result you described) - it's about the WAR,

                        I understand ... and it would also be worth the Americans to understand that it’s much easier to burn them in a nuclear war !!! wink Yes and it’s not a fact that we will finally be hurt if the Americans are crazy about us !!! wink laughing laughing laughing
                      2. 0
                        10 December 2017 18: 56
                        Quote: a.sirin
                        It must be understood that the United States will not respond with a tomato blockade - do you understand this or not?

                        How else to understand the sanctions? This is the "tomato" blockade.
                  7. 0
                    10 December 2017 22: 38
                    And why such confidence that the 22nd will give lyuley 35mu ?? What then fell down?
              2. +23
                9 December 2017 19: 53
                Quote: a.sirin
                In the face in return are not afraid to receive?

                I liked Kostya Tszyu's remark about offending a boxer. For Russia, it should be like this: stop
                EVERYONE CAN OFFEND RUSSIA, BUT NOT EVERYONE HAS TO TIME TO Apologize!
                soldier
                1. +1
                  10 December 2017 16: 32
                  comrade Zhukov (not Marshal) to help you
                2. +1
                  10 December 2017 16: 37
                  A good option! Konstantin (respected) Ju gave lyuley to Mike Tyson
              3. +3
                9 December 2017 21: 57
                Quote: a.sirin
                In the face in return are not afraid to receive?

                Always the one who is afraid, he receives !!!
                1. +1
                  10 December 2017 18: 00
                  "Long-term observations" show that getting in the face of those who are afraid and not afraid occurs with the same frequency ... The one who stands stronger on his feet wins. Economic.
              4. +9
                9 December 2017 22: 00
                The Nazis were "not afraid" of the same and brought their full-time Head to suicide! good So it is necessary with mattresses - beat them first !!
                By the way, both times that we fought against them with "small force" - we won that in Vietnam and in Korea. So - NO, we are not afraid tongue
                "A good American is a dead American !!!" soldier
                1. +1
                  10 December 2017 16: 40
                  A good American is a good American.
                  A bad American is a bad American.
                  In Vietnam, the Communists won (not the Vietnamese and not us).
                  Nobody won in Korea, although Kim Il Sung began.
                  By the way, where on the world map is that country that "we won in Vietnam"?
              5. +6
                10 December 2017 00: 24
                Quote: a.sirin
                In the face in return are not afraid to receive?

                Afraid, go to Mars. You will safely go to the toilet. Americans never fight with the strong. They are always with the winner together. See how they won two world wars ....
                1. The comment was deleted.
              6. +7
                10 December 2017 00: 34
                Quote: a.sirin
                In the face in return are not afraid to receive?

                We’re not afraid for a long time. Therefore
                After the appearance of a number of Russian multi-purpose super-maneuverable Su-35s fighter, the American fighter stopped dangerous maneuvers and hastened to retire

                But they are afraid, the DPRK sent them on an erotic journey, and they constantly clarify the route, so God forbid not to receive “penalty points” for deviating from the route. We also talked embarrassed earlier about the separation of zones in the airspace of the ATS, and now
                Statements by representatives of the US Army that there is a part of the US airspace in Syria cause bewilderment. Unlike the Russian Aerospace Forces, the aircraft of the US-led “international coalition” operates in Syria illegally. Representatives of the Pentagon should remember that Syria is a sovereign state and a member of the UN, therefore, the United States did not have any "own" sky and cannot be
                1. +2
                  10 December 2017 16: 42
                  "We" say a lot of things
            2. +3
              9 December 2017 23: 11
              Quote: self-propelled
              especially since
              Quote: Maksus
              "... Unlike the Russian air forces, the aviation of the US-led" international coalition "acts illegally in Syria ..."


              There is more to this "all the more." The Yankees are overwhelmed to the point that they threaten to shoot down our planes in the sky of Syria:
              1. +4
                10 December 2017 00: 27
                Quote: Lelek
                Quote: self-propelled
                especially since
                Quote: Maksus
                "... Unlike the Russian air forces, the aviation of the US-led" international coalition "acts illegally in Syria ..."


                There is more to this "all the more." The Yankees are overwhelmed to the point that they threaten to shoot down our planes in the sky of Syria:

                So that the jerk does not beat, let the go home blow from there. No one invited them.
                1. 0
                  10 December 2017 11: 10
                  Quote: Victor Dubovitsky
                  let them go home from there. Nobody invited them


                  Goat-bearded Sam with * s in the eyes - he will not even turn pink. Even the UN refused to adopt a resolution on this matter. And how do you propose to do this?
              2. +2
                10 December 2017 04: 26
                Lelek, 23:11. They are in Syria for the sake of the fight against IS, and not with the Russians! This phrase just touches. They are not against IS, they are fighting IS! Everyone understood the phrase: And not with the Russians or someone else! They do not want to fight the Russians against the IS. And they say it in plain text !!! *** Nobody invited them. *** Nobody invites them. They themselves come to where there are vile interests or someone threatens their interests. And their interest is there, and Russia threatens them.
                1. +1
                  10 December 2017 11: 14
                  Quote: Region 34
                  34 region


                  Hey. Here I am about the same to Victor Dubovitsky. The Yankees on all of our “fairies” make their faces rope and tryndyat about their superiority and victory over ISIS. Yes
          4. +8
            9 December 2017 17: 11
            Yes, why spare money on expensive US lawyers to fight with the US government in US courts.
          5. +5
            9 December 2017 17: 22
            Probably the militants removed this case.
            1. +4
              9 December 2017 20: 00
              Quote: figvam
              Probably the militants removed this case.

              Nothing of the kind. Three different videos shot at different times in different places.
            2. +9
              9 December 2017 22: 16
              Quote: figvam
              Probably the militants removed this case.

              At the end of the video, did the F-22 chase after ours? ... full sail
            3. +2
              10 December 2017 02: 17
              Quote: figvam
              Probably the militants removed this case.

              igilists have high-quality equipment for shooting !!! negative negative negative wassat
          6. +1
            9 December 2017 17: 26
            Are you seriously???? Do not make me laugh...
          7. +10
            9 December 2017 18: 04
            Quote: Maksus
            Maybe it's time to take our "concern" beyond the news in our media? Claims in international courts, requirements in the UN and other international organizations? Maybe it's time to really act on the territory of the enemy? That we will not have money to hire sensible lawyers to protect our reputation?

            It is useless to file with international courts, because they have fixed the priority of American law over international.
            Only this year we adopted a law that the Constitutional Court may not recognize the priority of decisions of international courts over Russian ones.
          8. +9
            9 December 2017 20: 39
            Quote: Maksus
            Maybe it's time to take our "concern" beyond the news in our media? Claims in international courts, requirements in the UN and other international organizations? Maybe it's time to really act on the territory of the enemy? That we will not have money to hire sensible lawyers to protect our reputation?

            The money of the oligarchs in foreign banks interfere with the implementation of everything you wrote.
          9. +4
            10 December 2017 04: 10
            Do you think their judicial system is impartial and ideal? Naive. I sometimes wonder that vivid and expressive cases with WADA, IOC, deep. The property of the adherents of the KhPP is not broken. Now the mattress letak only interfered, and soon he will already hit our plane. But even after this, the oligarchy of the Russian Federation only frowns menacingly and glares at "a stab in the back and you won’t get off with Bush’s legs." The owners of the Fed always act on an increasing basis, if they do not meet resistance.
        2. +13
          9 December 2017 16: 40
          [quote = User]
          Well, did the reptiloid run away? (c) a paraphrase from the film "High Security Vacation."
        3. +6
          9 December 2017 17: 25
          This is so far the Americans have not called our. They will call and then they will fly wherever they want. And we are again blah blah blah.
        4. +1
          10 December 2017 00: 36
          Not respected "User". Your friends have already delivered you 27 pluses .... I wonder how many priests appeared on VO before the election
      2. Zug
        +1
        9 December 2017 23: 45
        and they’re flying there really well, they don’t give a damn if they let them go there or not, they wanted to fly in, they don’t care for that
    2. +39
      9 December 2017 16: 25
      the department advised "we recommend filtering thoughts to individual representatives of the central command of the US Armed Forces

      They just said so: "Filter the market, overseas rooster." laughing
      1. +26
        9 December 2017 16: 44
        But the result of this chase
        1. +27
          9 December 2017 17: 40
          Quote: Logall
          But the result of this chase

          And the hunt was so
          1. +13
            9 December 2017 17: 47
            Volodya, brother, Solomon, below, already laid it out ... But I also looked at yours bully bully
            1. +2
              10 December 2017 02: 28
              Quote: Logall
              Volodya, brother, Solomon, below, already laid it out ... But I also looked at yours bully bully

              I laid it out about 3 days ago !! am am feel feel feel laughing laughing laughing
          2. +11
            9 December 2017 17: 49
            laughing laughing Checked whether all the cargo was dropped. Didn’t forget anything?
            1. +4
              9 December 2017 22: 03
              Well, if I understood, I decided to work out "refueling in the air" once more. good Actions are similar in complexity. Of course, at one time Chkalov was sitting on a lip behind a span under a bridge, but this one and this one are very strong pilots. soldier
      2. +20
        9 December 2017 16: 49
        I wonder where the US allies have gone. Usually, the Yankees substitute them for such things. I remember how one of the Europeans (the Belgians in my opinion) ruined. Apparently no one else wants, and the Americans themselves have to climb on the rampage. I'm afraid of them any more surprises to be expected.
        And why did the F-22 of the Su-35 approach not notice its radar? Willing to dump him with such a shame? And why didn’t he frighten him away by targeting rockets at distant approaches? 5 the American generation has departed from 4 Russian - is not it a shame !? At least for decency, it remained to observe the actions of the attack aircraft. hi
        1. +9
          9 December 2017 17: 29
          Quote: Kasym
          And why did the F-22 of the Su-35 approach not notice its radar?

          It is possible that they saw each other perfectly, but the American "air acrobat" decided to take ours "weakly," but it wasn’t there. angry And since acrobatic bailout was not part of the American’s free program, he flew home to train. request
          1. +18
            9 December 2017 17: 46
            They feel the "acrobats" that they have nothing to do with melee combat with the Su-35. Well, where are all these theories of long-range air combat in the given circumstances? It seems to me that Su got quietly when the 22nd was distracted by bullying the attack aircraft. But why didn’t they tell the KP about the Su-35? Maybe they missed? Where are their reconnaissance aircraft, space, radar, etc.? The 22nd could have gotten involved in a training battle (I could have asked for a connection) - the Russians would not have brought down, but they would probably have wanted to try the “taste” of the 22nd. So the "Raptor" was "blown away," in my opinion. hi
            1. +6
              9 December 2017 19: 05
              Most likely, ours specially released the ward bombers alone in order to provoke the Amerzian to such a dirty trick, well, and suddenly come out of nowhere to take off just in time, which our pilots did. The question, of course, is why the 22nd immediately ran away? Is it really so frustrating for them, they just can’t believe it, albeit amerz, but they are also military pilots, why it was frightening to pickey with ours, it is not clear.
              1. +10
                9 December 2017 22: 06
                Because - * punches and geeks !! It was the Americans in Korea who shot ours on parachutes, and this is the limit of baseness. negative It was these stripes of geeks who bombed and bombarded the unarmed Vietnamese peasants with napalm. negative . There is no and never was honor and conscience in Americans in general, and even more so in the military.
                America always and everywhere attacked ONLY a knowingly weaker opponent !!
      3. +6
        9 December 2017 17: 42
        Our whole generals (Konashenkov and Co.) perform a lot ... But is it weak to take and pile? And let beautiful girls from the press center comment on the words of someone from the US Ministry of Defense. Bravado does not win the war.
        1. +9
          9 December 2017 18: 06
          Quote: lexus
          Bravado does not win the war.

          Conventional wars do not win. And the Syrian war is not ordinary for us, but indirect. For the Americans, too, so the only direct military action between our armies can be a "military demonstration" or "provocation." The American has shown his intentions, we are ours. we get the result --- our attack aircraft completed their task. If the next time the enemy wants to raise the degree of escalation, then there may be local battles like in Korea, and since the theater of operations is extremely inconvenient for us and the enemy has an advantage over conventional weapons, then such the escalation will inevitably be compensated by the activation of our nuclear triad to cover our Syrian contingent. As you can see, this prospect stops well-packed Americans. The Air Force from rash actions and sudden movements towards our Syrian group.
        2. +9
          9 December 2017 18: 07
          Lexus So they won and beat the barmaley, so why else to run with the NATO? They purged. And the recognition of Jerusalem put an end to the authority of the United States in the Muslim world. Complete defeat, don’t you? The leaders of the United States and Israel can buy all the leaders of the Muslim world, but the people and the street can not buy. The Turks, who have ruled Jerusalem for several centuries, are increasingly moving away from NATO under such a policy. Whoever supports Trump at the summit of Muslim countries in Turkey will write a “sentence” to him. So they purged the NATO, but they will go on provocations. And your offer is only at hand. Maybe they achieve this? The US has 5 air bases in the region, and the Navy can block the entire Syrian express.
      4. +8
        9 December 2017 22: 22
        Quote: Monos
        They just said so: "Filter the market, overseas rooster

        Be healthy hi
        Damien Picart can be more specific:
        1. +6
          9 December 2017 22: 27
          Vitaly, good evening! smile hi
          Everything has its time. smile
  2. +13
    9 December 2017 16: 09
    One more geography expert!
    1. +22
      9 December 2017 16: 18
      They believe that they are there legally! But Assad and Russia - Outlawed!
      And Wishlist - the law, for them and the like ...
      1. +20
        9 December 2017 17: 24
        Salute guys!
        It is good that our fighters, in particular pilots, do not show the full potential of the stripes, otherwise they would get stuck ....


        ... don’t hi try to approach your Hercules from behind, spent condoms ...
        1. +12
          9 December 2017 17: 36
          Kostya, hi!
          Quote: Solomon Kane
          those would be stuck ....

          You are right, worthless, so that on the heads of civilians d ... Everything coincided!
  3. +7
    9 December 2017 16: 10
    Damien Picart, who claimed that the Russian airspace forces allegedly allow dangerous rapprochement with American planes in Syria by entering "into our airspace east of the Euphrates River."[i] [/ i]
    Here is a brazen type. mattresses think that only their students can drive jihad mobil. Let Beirut 83 not forget
  4. +23
    9 December 2017 16: 11
    I saw the SU35S, a brave Yankee. Well, in front of the attack aircraft, it’s safer to throw pontoons.
    1. +15
      9 December 2017 16: 30
      Quote: newbie
      I saw the SU35S, a brave Yankee. Well, in front of the attack aircraft, it’s safer to throw pontoons.

      he still did not understand where ours came from, he did not see it)))))))))))))))
      1. +11
        9 December 2017 16: 32
        here I am of that opinion.
      2. SOF
        +5
        9 December 2017 20: 17
        Quote: poquello

        he still did not understand where ours came from, he did not see it)))))))))))))))

        ... he’s just so invisible that sometimes he himself doesn’t see anything.
  5. +9
    9 December 2017 16: 12
    “We recommend filtering thoughts for individual representatives of the central command of the US Armed Forces

    I liked it separately! And it’s better to drink a tablet from the head, if of course they don’t have an extension of their neck, so that they themselves would fall away ... Instead of inserting a filter in the form of a Su-35.
    And apparently, in the General Staff sits a kind of Messing and intercepts thoughts ..
  6. +11
    9 December 2017 16: 22
    After the appearance of a number of Russian multi-purpose super-maneuverable Su-35s fighter, the American fighter stopped dangerous maneuvers and hastened to retire into Iraqi airspace

    Brilliant, pleased drinks
  7. +6
    9 December 2017 16: 23
    And now I ask the gentlemen of the experts, shouting that "stealth" is a profanity, to think about the question: How could it happen that a couple of “rook” Su-35 under cover managed to reach the range of a cannon shot (cuff by the standards of modern air combat)? "?. And, mind you, not just come up, but also play with them like a cat with mice! And, what would it be, if the American had an order to destroy these rooks?
    1. +16
      9 December 2017 16: 25
      It is still unknown how everything was there, and who came up to whom.
      1. +7
        9 December 2017 16: 49
        Here it is. Su 35 should not be allowed to join the battle or the simulation of the attack aircraft that he covered. And here at least a violation of the interaction. And 22 after execution and had to quickly leave ... At least the statement is either not accurate, or they are fooling someone.
        1. +3
          9 December 2017 17: 11
          And if there was no escort, how did 35 go there for 1, 2, 3 mines. From the air base?
          1. +5
            9 December 2017 19: 14
            IMHO, ours, most likely they themselves provoked the rapprochement of the 22nd with the rooks, released a few bombers accompanying them, the 35th, they themselves were somewhere nearby, and they appeared so quickly. I see no other reasonable explanation. Moreover, for a long time bombers have not been flying without cover.
          2. +3
            9 December 2017 20: 16
            Quote: Shahno
            And if there was no escort, how did 35 go there for 1, 2, 3 mines. From the air base?

            It takes ten minutes to fly all over Syria, and even less on the afterburner, where Dryka was located inexplicably, but clearly in the air. And it does not matter, the main thing is the brazen Raptor shuganuli wassat
        2. +5
          9 December 2017 17: 13
          Quote: Shahno
          Here it is. Su 35 shouldn’t be allowed to engage in combat or simulate attack aircraft,

          and how do you imagine it?
          1. +5
            9 December 2017 17: 32

            Quote: poquello
            Quote: Shahno
            Here it is. Su 35 shouldn’t be allowed to engage in combat or simulate attack aircraft,

            and how do you imagine it?




            Su 35 was to take on the sight of F 22 with its super-duper radar, And there would be no imitation of air combat. If I didn’t do this, I couldn’t and there’s nothing to throw the beads now.
            This is not the first time Konashenkov has been noted with stupid statements.
            1. +6
              9 December 2017 17: 42
              Quote: Do not care
              Quote: poquello
              Quote: Shahno
              Here it is. Su 35 shouldn’t be allowed to engage in combat or simulate attack aircraft,

              and how do you imagine it?




              Su 35 was to take on the sight of F 22 with its super-duper radar, And there would be no imitation of air combat. If I didn’t do this, I couldn’t and there’s nothing to throw the beads now.
              This is not the first time Konashenkov has been noted with stupid statements.

              a problem, you don’t need to take it 35m to the sight, everything is on the sight there
              1. +2
                9 December 2017 17: 57
                Well, if you wanted to fight really without revealing Yourself, Then what’s called - shot and forgot. And when you need to indicate your presence, intentions and capabilities, then radar is the best tool and perhaps the only
                1. +6
                  9 December 2017 18: 02
                  Quote: Do not care
                  Well, if you wanted to fight really without revealing Yourself, Then what’s called - shot and forgot. And when you need to indicate your presence, intentions and capabilities, then radar is the best tool and perhaps the only

                  that is, it is necessary to have such a radar so that Americans understand that it is time for them to make legs? and it was demonstrated, well, not a radar, but I understood
                2. +4
                  9 December 2017 18: 03
                  Here, judging by the details, the article diverges from reality. Well, this happens with the press from the MO, an artistic presentation. To support patriotism.
                  1. +6
                    9 December 2017 18: 08
                    Quote: Shahno
                    Here, judging by the details, the article diverges from reality. Well, this happens with the press from the MO, an artistic presentation. To support patriotism.

                    blablabla, more specifically
                    1. +1
                      9 December 2017 18: 43
                      I have stated my doubts above.
                      1. +5
                        9 December 2017 18: 53
                        Quote: Shahno
                        I have stated my doubts above.

                        Quote: Shahno
                        Here, judging by the details, the article diverges from reality.

                        but just like the undeniable facts)))))))))))))
                  2. +1
                    10 December 2017 04: 45
                    Well, in terms of artistic (fabulous) works on military subjects, many are far from Zionists (fascists).
                3. +1
                  9 December 2017 23: 06
                  Quote: Do not care
                  That radar is the best tool And perhaps the only

                  What did the F22 radar not turn on, not indicate intentions, so to speak? All round dances drove around the dryers? Or maybe he (the American pilot) took over the experience of how to get there.
            2. +5
              9 December 2017 17: 50
              I don’t care, why do we label lightnings? where does the biser? it may very well be that the lizard flew “according to its own affairs”, along a route previously agreed with us. Well, he did not notice Sushka, he decided to play a trick.
              1. +5
                9 December 2017 18: 57
                Quote: newbie
                I don’t care, why do we label lightnings? where does the biser? it may very well be that the lizard flew “according to its own affairs”, along a route previously agreed with us. Well, he did not notice Sushka, he decided to play a trick.

                when you need to indicate your presence, intentions and capabilities, the radar is the best tool And perhaps the only

                when, but ours don’t even know when they’re intercepting scouts at the border
            3. A.
              +4
              9 December 2017 20: 24
              Even Zadornov said that these are stupid Americans, and in yours this is evident not with the naked eye, but Konashenkov is Russian. One of your main balabol red suit what is worth. And Haley’s rat, it gives out pearls in general kapets, not to mention psaki
            4. +5
              9 December 2017 22: 08
              Quote: Do not care
              Su 35 was to take on the sight of F 22 with its super-duper radar, And there would be no imitation of air combat. If I didn’t do this, I couldn’t and there’s nothing to throw the beads now.
              Actually, we have an exchange of information on departure and goals with this bullshit American coalition, which by the way the Americans have repeatedly used to warn terrorists. So here the mattresses knew that our VKS would work, but decided to hang out. Well, when their “louse” began to spin and create interference, then our SU-35 came up and simply sent that “louse” in three letters, which it did, having disappeared in the airspace of a neighboring state. B / P still spend on all sorts of insects. Quite a lot of Pshli won
        3. +12
          9 December 2017 17: 14
          there could be no interaction disturbance; tea was not the first flight. the Yankees apparently overestimated their “invisibility" and got into a mess. here I am more inclined to agree with a colleague under the nickname Fedorov.
    2. +19
      9 December 2017 16: 25
      I don’t know what you thought up, but according to the article it’s clear that 35 came up later to pacify the bully. this is just the 22nd missed ours.
      1. +6
        9 December 2017 16: 35
        Quote: newbie
        I don’t know what you thought up, but according to the article it’s clear that 35 came up later to pacify the bully. this is just the 22nd missed ours.

        And I don’t know where you got this nonsense hi
        That is, you still acknowledge that the people on our side who controlled the su-25 pair’s trying remained ignorant of the presence of the f22 in the area and the cries of the rooks “they offend us” served as a signal for the su-35 approach to help?
        And as for who called someone - so please note that the f-22 pilot dumped exactly when the situation became unprofitable for him. Not dangerous, namely disadvantageous. Those. his pilot controlled the situation from beginning to end. Otherwise, this provocation was simply not allowed.
        1. +13
          9 December 2017 16: 40
          listen to you there, take it easier with delusions. nonsense written by you. you read the article, do not limit your headlines to your brain.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. +9
              9 December 2017 18: 05
              save eloquence. I can’t say anything, because add to your zero comment, do not add, the result is zero. and your initial comment on the topic I look at the picture, pass on the exam.
              1. 0
                10 December 2017 10: 16
                Quote: newbie
                because to your zero komenty add, do not add, the result is zero. and your initial comment on the topic I look at the picture, pass on the exam.

                No matter how useful it is, knowing the prices to her, an ignoramus about her is a good judge. And, if the ignoramus is recognized, then he also persecutes her.)))
                Krylov
        2. +3
          9 December 2017 18: 49
          how do you know who controlled what? Or was it you who painted pirouettes on the raptor? I doubt
          we don’t know the truth anyway, as both our and "partners" can ride on the ears
        3. +1
          10 December 2017 04: 50
          Quote: tchoni
          And as for who called someone - so please note that the f-22 pilot dumped exactly when the situation became unprofitable for him. Not dangerous, namely disadvantageous. Those. his pilot controlled the situation from beginning to end. Otherwise, this provocation was simply not allowed.

          Discovered Antarctica. Mattress always dumps when the situation is not favorable for them, not trying to break it in a direction favorable for themselves.
          1. 0
            10 December 2017 10: 19
            And rightly so. For since the time of the Sun Song Tzu, it is considered correct to beat the enemy where he is weaker, and where he is stronger or equal - it is better not to touch him.
      2. +9
        9 December 2017 16: 50
        garik hi . This is either a schoolboy or an alley.
        1. +5
          9 December 2017 17: 02
          Vyacheslav, welcome. Yes, God is with them.
          1. +12
            9 December 2017 17: 10
            Slavik, Garik, I welcome you, friends!
            Quote: newbie
            God be with them.

            Someone is with them, but obviously this is not God! Either damn striped or ... Hairy! I am inclined to the second option. I doubt that the first would become associated with this evil spirits ...
            1. +6
              9 December 2017 17: 22
              Hi Alexander yes then I am so, gently, without escalating.
              1. +9
                9 December 2017 17: 27
                Garik, pump it up, do not pump it up, but shakes it every time when it comes to them!
                1. +5
                  9 December 2017 17: 36
                  Sanya, I fully agree with you. Yes, here Glory is really right. not worth it. Saturday night ahead. who knows who knows what news we brought this evening.
                  1. +9
                    9 December 2017 17: 43
                    Quote: newbie
                    brought this evening.

                    What brings us the evening?
                    The silence of loneliness
                    in a dark, comfortable room
                    blue twilight ...
                    Or ringing melodic
                    ruler’s soul - guitars,
                    very wise and old ...
                    Voice of childhood
                    and in a noisy circle of friends
                    bursts of youth.

                    It also brings us evening
                    thoughts of the wind
                    draft of hope
                    expectations easy rustles -
                    though impossible
                    all this is unrealizable a thousand times!
                    Windows in the room
                    like souls, wide open.
                    You have already been captured by this heady wind!
                    Is this happiness?

                    Petal smiles
                    fluttered carefully from your lips
                    and whirling, falls to the floor.
                    The twilight goes out.
                    Only in the heart was born
                    strange quiet music.
                    Maybe about breathing
                    in the haze of time of a melting meeting ...
                    What brings us the evening?
                    1. +3
                      9 December 2017 17: 59
                      Alexander, bravo! no words! more precisely, they are superfluous.
    3. +5
      9 December 2017 16: 36
      Quote: tchoni
      And now I ask the gentlemen of the experts, shouting that "stealth" is a profanity, to think about the question: How could it happen that a couple of “rook” Su-35 under cover managed to reach the range of a cannon shot (cuff by the standards of modern air combat)? "?. And, mind you, not just come up, but also play with them like a cat with mice! And, what would it be, if the American had an order to destroy these rooks?

      War would be. And you would not write your nonsense here, and now. We wouldn’t throw tomatoes with the Turks like with them. Here the conversation is adult. And whoever succeeds in the first is right.
      1. +1
        9 December 2017 17: 39
        Quote: Victor Dubovitsky
        War would be. And you would not write your nonsense here, and now. We wouldn’t throw tomatoes with the Turks like with them. Here the conversation is adult. And whoever succeeds in the first is right.

        You think? You are an optimist.
    4. +9
      9 December 2017 16: 40
      but why did you decide that we didn’t see our hoes?
      You still say that ours did not see him even when he disturbed them. Like they flew to themselves flew, in a different bang, out of nowhere, heat traps were released. the pilots are in shock, the scientists are upset, because they saw the impossible.
      1. 0
        10 December 2017 10: 22
        Quote: just explo
        but why did you decide that we didn’t see our hoes?

        Because they didn’t take them for escort. If they took it, he would have dumped the su-35 before approaching.
    5. +4
      9 December 2017 16: 40
      Quote: tchoni
      And, what would it be, if the American had an order to destroy these rooks?

      And what would have been ours to destroy the stripes?
      At least a local war game with a high degree of probability turning into a full-scale one. fool
    6. +12
      9 December 2017 16: 42
      Behind the tail or into the wing of the Su-35 it is not even recommended to fly behind the Rooks to put it mildly. He soars away and higher - he saw over 50 km that something was wrong, flew up. I think they saw each other "partners" perfectly, climbed,
      ours turned out to be "thicker".
      Who knows, maybe they felt the “capture” of the f-22, but it’s not the heat traps at all.
    7. SOF
      +5
      9 December 2017 20: 24
      . And now I ask the experts gentlemen, yelling that "stealth" is a profanity

      laughing you want to say that this "miracle of technology" frolic, released traps, simulated a fight, but due to its exceptional invisibility, all this time, there was the 35th and in no way could not see it with ordinary eyes ??? wassat
      Yes, you are an expert on transparent aircraft, however. wink
  8. +9
    9 December 2017 16: 24
    Statements by representatives of the US Army that a part of the airspace that belongs to the United States exists in Syria is puzzling.
    And it pleases, this is one of the first statements to which our Defense Ministry without chewing answered ... that something in the world has changed ...
  9. +9
    9 December 2017 16: 25
    The Russian Federation is at the invitation of the legitimate government in Syria, and the hairy-striped law is not written ... they only understand the power
  10. +3
    9 December 2017 16: 28
    Yes, you need to bring them down, a couple of planes will fall, they will clean the puddle.
  11. +5
    9 December 2017 16: 29
    Something I did not understand what kind of “strongholds” we bombed on November 23 “in the suburbs of Al-Mayadin,” if on October 14, according to RT and RIA, I quote, the Syrian troops freed the city and its surroundings from the terrorists of the “Islamic State” Al Mayadina in the province of Deir ez-Zor. This was announced by spokesman for the Russian Defense Ministry, Major General Igor Konashenkov. Presumably, between October 15 and November 23, the Basurmans again regained control of this part of the province and have to take it again. The Syrians (Assad’s army) do not want to fight and do not know how. And here they are much to drape ...
    1. +3
      9 December 2017 17: 29
      Quote: Anyone
      I didn’t understand what kind of "strongholds" we bombed on November 23 "in the suburbs of Al-Mayadin," if on October 14, according to RT and RIA, I quote, the Syrian troops freed the city and its surroundings from the terrorists of the Islamic State Al Mayadina in the province of Deir ez-Zor.

      Yes, it was already easy to lie, and they themselves forget when and what they announced ... Vaughn and Abu Kamal “released” another 9.11.2017., But a month later, for some reason, they also bombed together with the Americans ... And according to Shoigu, "The civil war in Syria is over" three months ago.
  12. +8
    9 December 2017 16: 31
    It’s strange, but how does this “super” Fu 22 plane slip away when the Su 35 appears? it turns out that the gut is thin to drive show-offs before the "rusty" aviation of the Russian Federation! always they are so little that they run shamefully. negative laughing
    1. +4
      9 December 2017 17: 06
      It’s strange, but how does this “super” Fu 22 plane slip away when the Su 35 appears? it turns out that the gut is thin to drive show-offs before the "rusty" aviation of the Russian Federation! they are always so little that they run shamefully

      Pot with such a flag and ... Aren't you afraid that you will be deported to Mexico? drinks
  13. +7
    9 December 2017 16: 32
    He invisibly interfered with the ax of the shields and maneuvering. But rather quickly and apparently he left, probably, in order not to show ALL of his combat capabilities to a fighter suppressing everyone and everything.
    1. +2
      9 December 2017 17: 47
      It’s like a ruff or a goby, it will put its fins, pull it and think that there is FISH. And you pull it out, and there the male sits on the hook. But how puffed up.
  14. The comment was deleted.
    1. +10
      9 December 2017 16: 39
      Quote: GaLe
      I have no doubt that this stuffing is great for warming the soul of the cheers, the Defense Ministry knows its unpretentious audience well

      Well, break all the "stuffing" to smithereens! Provide reliable info, how everything was "really" there ...
      Because otherwise your statements have exactly the same weight, if not less, than the indicated "stuffing" ...
    2. +10
      9 December 2017 16: 45
      Quote: GaLe
      I have no doubt that this stuffing is warming the soul of the cheers, the Moscow Region knows its unpretentious audience laughing laughing well

      laughter for no reason - a sign of foolishness, as if the MO had nothing to do with, pilots f22 howled about their blind planes a little earlier
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. +7
      9 December 2017 19: 06
      For the liberals of Amer’s patriotoffs, it’s unthinkable how Russians are Russian patriots, because the whole “civilized” world is patriotizing omerihoff, but for the money, there are individuals, like you
    5. +2
      10 December 2017 07: 15
      Take away the Russian "tricolor" and place your "mattress" flag, otherwise people may not understand and at the same time pile up in full! Apparently, the "stripes" forgot the lessons of the war in Korea, so they are "puffing" - the main thing is that they don’t "pile" into their pants, although their diapers therefore "hero"!
  15. +5
    9 December 2017 16: 36
    The answer of our side is focused and complete. When repeating a similar situation, you must shoot down. The USA loves and understands only specifics.
  16. +5
    9 December 2017 16: 36
    The American F-22 fighter actively prevented a Russian pair of Su-25 attack aircraft from performing the combat mission of destroying the IS stronghold in the suburbs of Al-Mayadin.

    Campaign pin dos generally lost the coast !!! belay
    So they want to arrange another war game, and even with the participation of Russia, that they are completely insolent. Then the "cry" will be about the "aggressive" Russia !!!!
    Until someone crashes to the ground because of such provocations, they won’t calm down, only what has not been done will be changed and someone’s blood will be shed, which can lead to even more.
    Yes, damn you damned overseas "friends", with which the enemies are no longer needed !!! am
  17. +1
    9 December 2017 16: 42
    Well done flyers, there’s nothing to talk about. But politicians ... who do they work for?
    1. 0
      9 December 2017 17: 37
      Are you talking about ours, or about whom?
      1. 0
        9 December 2017 17: 39
        About ours, unfortunately.
        1. +1
          9 December 2017 19: 58
          Quote: groks
          But politicians ... who do they work for?

          Quote: groks
          About ours, unfortunately.

          Are you already at the front? Our valiant troops bomb Voronezh?
          No way ?! And what, in fact, are not happy with?
          1. 0
            9 December 2017 20: 56
            Are you already at the front? Our valiant troops bomb Voronezh?

            Do not quite understand. Do you have your own troops? Is it the troops of the Russian Federation? Is it the troops of some other country?
            In all cases - what is the merit of our politicians?
            1. +1
              9 December 2017 21: 31
              Quote: groks
              Do not quite understand.

              If you do not understand RUSSIAN idioms, a completely natural question arises: are you Russian?
              1. 0
                9 December 2017 21: 42
                What kind? "Taki" and instead of answering, I got a question. I should not have anything about this?
                Well, what are the merits of our politicians in that they do not bomb?
                Last winter, we drove a garbage truck into a transmission line support, and it was fun without bombing.
                1. 0
                  10 December 2017 13: 03
                  Quote: groks
                  Last winter, we drove a garbage truck into a transmission line support, and it was fun without bombing.

                  I suppose the power transmission line-600 ?! You won’t believe it, but I can’t imagine if your garbage truck is not MOAZ-20.
                  We have a population density of 4 per 1 sq. Km to 1 per 4 sq. Km. And sho us your personal problems?
                  1. 0
                    10 December 2017 14: 16
                    I suppose the power transmission line-600 ?!

                    In the town?
                    We have a population density of 4 per 1 sq. Km to 1 per 4 sq. Km

                    In Voronezh?
                    And sho us your personal problems?

                    Idiom? Russian?
                    After all I want to ask - did you bury the Red and Dead Seas? What is your density so low?
                    1. 0
                      10 December 2017 17: 11
                      Quote: groks
                      did you bury the Red and Dead Seas? What is your density so low?

                      And why do we need to bury your puddle?
                      Quote: groks
                      I suppose the power transmission line-600 ?!

                      In the town?

                      So I think: where do the power transmission towers come from in the city?
                      1. 0
                        10 December 2017 17: 21
                        It’s not me who is persistently using shtetl jargon.
                        There are enough piers in the city. In the end, there is a Google with Yandex. If interesting.
                        Just in case, I’ll ask again - what is the merit of our politicians that Voronezh is not bombed by any “valiant troops” at all?
    2. 0
      9 December 2017 19: 07
      What bad airplanes order? and which ones?
  18. +8
    9 December 2017 16: 43
    But it's good that they are substituted there with their stealth. Just the same, you can really assess the degree of their invisibility by both ground and air locators.
    1. +5
      9 December 2017 17: 39
      The main thing is to take readings of all the parameters of this type of aircraft that interest us.
    2. +3
      9 December 2017 19: 08
      before they were afraid to send F22 / F35 and the rest were close to us, they were afraid that we think the parameters, apparently now the deer are really sitting at the helm
      1. +1
        9 December 2017 23: 17
        Quote: melelele
        before they were afraid to send F22 / F35 and the rest were close to us, they were afraid that we think the parameters, apparently now the deer are really sitting at the helm

        Perhaps already considered.
  19. +2
    9 December 2017 16: 43
    But what did the stormtrooper shot down by the Ottomans teach nothing and our rooks continue to fly unaccompanied? Or now amer !!! do we believe?
    1. +6
      9 December 2017 16: 57
      Quote: mitrich
      But what did the stormtrooper shot down by the Ottomans teach nothing and our rooks continue to fly unaccompanied? Or now amer !!! do we believe?

      and why, shoot them down right away? here is a typical example - nobody knocked anyone down, but I hope the bourgeois understood everything
  20. +11
    9 December 2017 16: 57
    By their horns and between them. The main thing is not to pass, the constant presence in the sky, so that they will not be forgotten.
  21. +5
    9 December 2017 17: 02
    Yes, in close combat against the Su-35, the raptor is the raptor and is the dromaeosaurids. A dinosaur, he is a dinosaur - an endangered species
    1. +3
      9 December 2017 17: 39
      Quote: pafegosoff
      Yeah, melee

      And many such close fights took place between them ???! And so are the distant ...? If tomorrow someone writes with a hangover that the "raptor" itself falls to the ground at the sight of Su and MiG, will you also believe in this? ... Hehe hehe hehe ....
      1. +5
        9 December 2017 19: 09
        He and the glider and engines do not allow to enter into the "dogfight" with Sushki, especially with the SU-35
        the main thing is that it would not start to fall apart, like Fu35 in the air
      2. 0
        10 December 2017 05: 04
        Here the situation for the F-22 was tolerable because the Su-35 was one (Su-25 is a ground attack aircraft not for maneuver combat). It would be good for the F-22 pilot to engage in close combat without using weapons to demonstrate all the advantages of mattress technology over the wretched Soviet one and the skill of "exceptional" mattress pilots over Russian silver-footed men, giving trump cards in the hands of people like you, but alas, the mattress pilot chose "legs in hands and run. "
        1. 0
          10 December 2017 11: 21
          Quote: zoolu350
          in front of Russian blue-legged men, giving trump cards in the hands of people like you, but alas, the mattress pilot chose "feet in hands and run."

          How old are you, 14 - 16 probably? ... Judging by the fantastic nonsense that you write - it is unlikely that you are more than that. At least at that level, your mind ...
          1. 0
            11 December 2017 01: 25
            Quote: Fedya2017

            How old are you, 14 - 16 probably? ... Judging by the fantastic nonsense that you write - it is unlikely that you are more than that. At least at that level, your mind ...

            Do not guess, I am much more years old. As I understand it, any other than your opinion is already nonsense. Fantastic nonsense, it is at least bright. And your sad conclusions, of course, are pulled to the level of a mattress high school, wretchedly.
  22. +1
    9 December 2017 17: 15
    The "allies against the IS" (USA - RF) are growing irritated with each other ... Our people are annoyed that the Americans do not allow their Kurds and other "opposition", which seized the most "tidbit" territories of Syria, to be bombed. The Americans reproach ours for not being defeated by IS in such a time without them. In evidence, they released a release indicating the number of Amer airstrikes on the "our" side of Efrat. for example in Abu Kamal. Indeed, our aviation from the a / b "Khmeimim" did not have time to work simultaneously throughout Syria, even taking into account long-range aviation. The number of airstrikes on IS is approximately the same for aviation of the Russian-Syrian and American coalitions. Despite the “hot line” between the pilots of both sides, there were more frequent cases of mutual violations of agreements and accusations in the air.
    1. +5
      9 December 2017 19: 11
      Quote: Fedya2017
      cases of mutual disturbances became more frequent in the air.

      Oh, Fedya, well, I don’t even know what time ... Apparently, in the hundred thousandth, but nonetheless: NO ONE called these ghouls to Syria. Mattresses, overexcited from their own evil torture, go to direct provocations against our videoconferencing systems, no longer encrypted. But these agreements mean only that for the time being they were ALLOWED to fly somewhere and, as it were, to fight terrorists, yeah. Now, even Syrian Kurds are hinting to mattresses that, they say, "thank you, you are free." But no, they are at the door, they are at the window. Cattle have already claimed the mythical "their airspace", yeah. Apparently, the cattle of this rabble at the genetic level, one gesture "legs on the table" says a lot (means "this is mine"). And it is quite natural that the “patient” is already starting to fail. After all, they will lead to sin, unreasonable.
    2. +3
      9 December 2017 20: 02
      A lot of words. And what did you want to say?
      1. 0
        9 December 2017 20: 55
        Quote: sogdy
        And what did you want to say?

        Yes, you still do not understand ... This is for the smart, not for you.
        1. +2
          9 December 2017 21: 50
          Quote: Fedya2017
          This is for the smart, not for you.

          Panyal .. nevertheless, we don’t have anything smart.
          1. 0
            9 December 2017 22: 36
            Quote: sogdy
            Panyal .. nevertheless, we don’t have anything smart.

            Hmmmmmm ... Listen, don’t take offense ... I'm joking, without malice. Sorry if what ... Frets ?!
            1. +1
              10 December 2017 13: 04
              Quote: Fedya2017
              Sorry if what ... Frets ?!

              FORWARD?
              1. +1
                10 December 2017 13: 34
                Quote: sogdy
                FORWARD?

                Yep ...
  23. +4
    9 December 2017 17: 16
    Or maybe Comrade. Eun at least a letter to talk about the DPRK space over the evil empire? That would be the number. Manufacturers of diapers sent a very large amount to the DPRK.
    And if without jokes, then it’s time to pinch a little and “exceptional”. Kosher, tried to spoil in Syria - 5 out of 6 missiles did not reach. While quieted down. It is time to wipe out and the world parasite from Syria. And who is the "exceptional" soldier, the Planet knows everything. So do not bother with US lards for military purposes. It’s not a plane or a tank that is fighting, a soldier is fighting! A soldier from Amer, like a bullet from shit. Americans are scary only for thieves. Further, everyone knows.
  24. +3
    9 December 2017 17: 17
    it’s necessary to shoot down these fag, the war so the war does not hide his head in the sand, and so they spit on us openly, the liberals will bring the country to death!
    1. +1
      9 December 2017 23: 21
      Quote: alfa19638
      to shoot down these fag

      What if they are not ... homosexual? Shoot the normal guys?
  25. +6
    9 December 2017 17: 17
    They themselves agreed on cooperation to avoid incidents in the air and to establish coordination with the Coalition to fight terrorism. That's from there and the Americans appeared "..air space ..".
    But in general, I want to note that this is a good sign when we do not wipe ourselves out or express concern, but simply fall out of the Su-35 clouds to clear the airspace for our attack aircraft! good It’s dangerous, but the Yankees must know their place.
  26. +5
    9 December 2017 17: 30
    Of course, you can show off in front of the “old people”, and as soon as the “young, strong and full of strength” appears, who can give it too much teeth, he liquidated it and dumped the diapers in Iraq laughing angry
    1. +3
      9 December 2017 17: 41
      Real, typical Yankees. What did you want? Nobody wants to get the teeth.
  27. +3
    9 December 2017 17: 31
    The SU-25 will be older, 35. Well, on 22, Amer, he overheated or played too much, flew diapers, but apparently they didn’t have enough of them after the report, they grabbed mounds.
  28. +4
    9 December 2017 17: 33
    It is only necessary to accidentally bring down an American once and everything will stop immediately. The main thing is to choose the right moment.
  29. +4
    9 December 2017 17: 48
    Quote: Victor Dubovitsky
    He invisibly interfered with the ax of the shields and maneuvering. But rather quickly and apparently he left, probably, in order not to show ALL of his combat capabilities to a fighter suppressing everyone and everything.

    He needs to poke fenders, as time has shown, also carefully. It may fall off. :))
  30. +1
    9 December 2017 18: 01
    I wonder how it really was?
    1. +1
      9 December 2017 18: 54
      here too, and then there is such a discussion laughing , but to the point, one hell of truth we do not know ... hi
  31. +3
    9 December 2017 18: 06
    henceforth, apparently, in support of our rooks, a couple of Su-30SM or Su-35 are needed ...
  32. +11
    9 December 2017 18: 44
    It was necessary to force him to sit down at his airfield.
  33. +3
    9 December 2017 18: 55
    American F-22 fighter actively prevented a Russian pair of Su-25 attack aircraft from performing a combat mission

    But after all, the F-22 sawn g ** but how could he send something against the Su-25?
    1. +3
      9 December 2017 19: 11
      he is a saw th ** but ...
      Wow, he was able to demonstrate something against a 78-year-old plane, fly nearby and shoot traps, WOW breakthrough
      1. +8
        9 December 2017 21: 19
        They are only capable of this.
  34. 0
    9 December 2017 19: 06
    Quote: Young_Communist
    American F-22 fighter actively prevented a Russian pair of Su-25 attack aircraft from performing a combat mission

    But after all, the F-22 sawn g ** but how could he send something against the Su-25?

    What do you want to say?
  35. +2
    9 December 2017 19: 08
    Maybe they brought a lot of air from America with them? And they released him over Syria?
  36. +2
    9 December 2017 19: 10
    I propose to immediately declare Russian airspace over Alaska, California, and ... oh ma ... what is there that is trifling .. over Faitington !!!
    So skip our asymmetric answer ...
    And God forbid, if in this space someone dares to flap the flaps in front of our Swans ...
  37. +2
    9 December 2017 19: 12
    Americans - hypocritical impudent bastards ...
  38. +3
    9 December 2017 19: 17
    We recommend the “Asam” of the United States to obey Russian pilots, and not its command, because otherwise it will be worse for them ... - Everywhere in the world.
    1. +2
      9 December 2017 19: 56
      The main thing is to have the right orientation, and the right pose.
  39. +2
    9 December 2017 19: 40
    Quote: vovanpain
    Quote: Logall
    But the result of this chase

    And the hunt was so

    Fell off beautifully! The airborne equipment according to the ADO, or whatever they are now, without a parachute and not on a “leash” when throwing out is not an order.
    1. +1
      9 December 2017 22: 51
      One was definitely on a leash, which in safety glasses, in the last seconds of the video you can see the halyard going to the belt.
  40. +2
    9 December 2017 19: 45
    Something states in the sky of Syria are insolent! Our business is dropping them from there! negative soldier
  41. +7
    9 December 2017 19: 48
    Again unprofessionally acted.
  42. +2
    9 December 2017 20: 18
    Unlike the Russian aerospace forces, the aviation of the US-led “international coalition” acts illegally in Syria.

    Yes, they put on the "not legal"
  43. A.
    +1
    9 December 2017 20: 28
    Quote: Do not care
    Quote: poquello
    Quote: Shahno
    Here it is. Su 35 shouldn’t be allowed to engage in combat or simulate attack aircraft,

    and how do you imagine it?




    Su 35 was to take on the sight of F 22 with its super-duper radar, And there would be no imitation of air combat. If I didn’t do this, I couldn’t and there’s nothing to throw the beads now.
    This is not the first time Konashenkov has been noted with stupid statements.

    Even Zadornov said that these are stupid Americans, and in yours this is evident not with the naked eye, but Konashenkov is Russian. One of your main balabol red suit what is worth. And Haley’s rat, it gives out pearls in general kapets, not to mention psaki
  44. +2
    9 December 2017 21: 36
    It was necessary for the dryer to catch up with him and imitate sexual intercourse with him, even if he would turn around.
  45. +2
    9 December 2017 21: 57
    no one fired rockets at them (they are invisible!); just random start
  46. +1
    9 December 2017 22: 38
    Well, I told you what will begin - it has begun. This is the Americans, what will you take from them? Someone once told them that they are the Most Important in the world, and so they do it everywhere. And after all, look at how lucky they are - it constantly rolls at them. But even the old woman, they say, is a bitch ... they will run into one day.
  47. +1
    9 December 2017 22: 54
    They must be driven not only from Syria, but also from Europe and Asia in general!
  48. +1
    9 December 2017 23: 58
    This is a good statement, you need to make such statements more often in order to: 1. put the amers in their place, 2. the case is "smelly", it will happen sooner or later, if it works out like with the Turks, then there will be a reason to answer real, and if it works out on the contrary, we warned you.
  49. +1
    10 December 2017 00: 50
    Now imagine what our pilots ... When you really want to shoot down but you can’t ... They are military, and I force them to play politics ...
  50. 0
    10 December 2017 01: 23
    We have a whole Foreign Ministry showing concern. And personally, comrades Zakharova and Lavrov.
  51. +1
    10 December 2017 01: 26
    The Ministry of Defense should not comment but fight. otherwise there is a whole commentator with the rank of major general.
  52. +1
    10 December 2017 05: 36
    A couple of "rooks" is normal, but why do f 22 and su 35 fly one at a time?
  53. 0
    10 December 2017 06: 49
    Yankees only understand the whip...
  54. +1
    10 December 2017 06: 52
    They are still trying to prevent our Aerospace Forces from destroying ISIS, and “landing” them to hell! After all, they are aggressors according to all international standards and Syria has the right to close its airspace to them, with all the ensuing consequences, and the Russian Aerospace Forces will help Syria! And stop making polite jokes with presumptuous robbers, because the one who helps criminals is ultimately a criminal himself! And we need to talk about this on any occasion and in any audience from the UN to all media! And stop expressing “concern” - let the “minke whales” be “concerned” about the power of our videoconferencing!
  55. +2
    10 December 2017 07: 07
    Syrian missilemen Ivanov and Petrov shot down the invisible F22 (everything they don’t see, they shoot down!)
  56. +3
    10 December 2017 07: 45
    Cool guys! However, we fell out of reality, but did not lose caution. They don’t want to mess with the Su-35, but what if something comes from these crazy Russians. They don't understand jokes, they almost punch them in the face.
  57. +2
    10 December 2017 10: 46
    The usual minor episodes were blown out of proportion.
    The American flew close - the attack aircraft left.
    The Su-35 flew close - the F-22 left.
    Nobody was afraid of anyone. But no one wants stupid incidents.
    1. 0
      10 December 2017 11: 30
      Quote: voyaka uh
      The usual minor episodes were blown out of proportion.

      All this is for internal consumption... Propaganda. In fact, there is a “hotline”, pilots have clear instructions, etc.
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Nobody was afraid of anyone. But no one wants stupid incidents.

      This is true. And it is right.
      1. +6
        10 December 2017 12: 59
        In fact, they will want to hear, they will want not to hear, they may even say that everything was fine, but Fedya 2017 jinxed it. drinks
        1. +1
          10 December 2017 13: 18
          Quote: ul_vitalii
          In fact, they will want to hear, they will want not to hear

          This is true... But so far Russia’s actions in Syria are quite satisfactory to the United States - IS has been defeated, the country is effectively divided. There are disagreements over the post-war structure of Syria. and specifically regarding the fate of Assad... I think they will come to an agreement. Assad and the Alawites will still have to be removed from the leadership of power, the Alawites are a national minority... The country is 75% Sunni. Either the division of the country, with the Alawites retaining the coastal territories where they live compactly, then Assad will remain in power, and the Alawites will be safer under the protection of Russian military bases. Time will show...
    2. +1
      10 December 2017 13: 34
      Quote: voyaka uh
      The usual minor episodes were blown out of proportion.
      The American flew close - the attack aircraft left.
      The Su-35 flew close - the F-22 left.
      Nobody was afraid of anyone. But no one wants stupid incidents.

      Why did the American come close? From a desire not to get involved in an incident? And after showing a possible attack of 35, did you stop wanting to? Or did you want to stop wanting?
      1. 0
        10 December 2017 14: 28
        Quote: Victor Dubovitsky
        Why did the American come close?

        The Americans claim that ours are entering the eastern side of the Efrat without approval, violating previously concluded agreements... This is for this specific episode. They shot down the Syrians jumping beyond the Efrat - right away. Now mutual accusations will only increase, from the allies in the war against ISIS, after the defeat of the latter, differences will become increasingly stronger and turn into hostility... There, in general, a new war is brewing, this time more serious. Israel and other neighbors of Syria really don’t like Iran’s consolidation in Syria... And of course this is a reason for US aggression against Iran, they have been sharpening their teeth on the Iranians for a long time... “We’ll see”...
        1. +1
          10 December 2017 15: 07
          Quote: Fedya2017
          Quote: Victor Dubovitsky
          Why did the American come close?

          The Americans claim that ours are entering the eastern side of the Efrat without approval, violating previously concluded agreements... This is for this specific episode. They shot down the Syrians jumping beyond the Efrat - right away. Now mutual accusations will only increase, from the allies in the war against ISIS, after the defeat of the latter, differences will become increasingly stronger and turn into hostility... There, in general, a new war is brewing, this time more serious. Israel and other neighbors of Syria really don’t like Iran’s consolidation in Syria... And of course this is a reason for US aggression against Iran, they have been sharpening their teeth on the Iranians for a long time... “We’ll see”...

          It's time for Assad to declare victory over ISIS, and the need to withdraw all uninvited people.
          It’s clear that it won’t work out quickly, but through the UN, then the UN Security Council, keep pushing and pushing.
          1. 0
            10 December 2017 17: 37
            Quote: Victor Dubovitsky
            It's time for Assad to declare victory over ISIS, and the need to withdraw all uninvited people.

            Moscow has already announced the victory over ISIS, what can we say about Assad... The awards have already rained down and champagne was shot at the ceiling. ISIS remnants are still fighting in Hama and Idlib, and have even expanded their territory. Now Russian-Syrian aviation is working hard there......... Of course they will finish it off, the most frostbitten ISIS remain there. A long guerrilla war will probably begin, because up to 70% of Syrian ISIS fighters are local (Sunnis). And Assad’s main military force is the Iranians (Shiites) and the Lebanese Hezbollah. Well, the Syrians have their own. really, it's more of a village rabble. they have little combat capability... There is little left of the former pre-war army.
            Quote: Victor Dubovitsky
            but through the UN, then the UN Security Council to push and push.

            There is work for diplomats here... The influence of the Americans and their satellites in the UN is very great. Let's see...
            1. 0
              10 December 2017 23: 57
              Quote: Fedya2017
              Quote: Victor Dubovitsky
              It's time for Assad to declare victory over ISIS, and the need to withdraw all uninvited people.

              Moscow has already announced the victory over ISIS, what can we say about Assad... The awards have already rained down and champagne was shot at the ceiling. ISIS remnants are still fighting in Hama and Idlib, and have even expanded their territory. Now Russian-Syrian aviation is working hard there......... Of course they will finish it off, the most frostbitten ISIS remain there. A long guerrilla war will probably begin, because up to 70% of Syrian ISIS fighters are local (Sunnis). And Assad’s main military force is the Iranians (Shiites) and the Lebanese Hezbollah. Well, the Syrians have their own. really, it's more of a village rabble. they have little combat capability... There is little left of the former pre-war army.
              Quote: Victor Dubovitsky
              but through the UN, then the UN Security Council to push and push.

              There is work for diplomats here... The influence of the Americans and their satellites in the UN is very great. Let's see...

              Russia cannot declare Victory and the withdrawal of all those not invited. Only the President of Syria can do this. Assad or not Assad. What we said is the opinion of an outsider, an ally, but an outsider. Decrees and the establishment of Victory Day are not within our competence.
              1. 0
                11 December 2017 20: 05
                Quote: Victor Dubovitsky
                Only the President of Syria can do this. Assad or not Assad.

                Yes, that's true... The Syrian Foreign Ministry made such a statement in September. the Americans simply ignored... Assad needs a platform at the UN for such a statement. but he is unlikely to risk going there without guarantees of safety... After all, the Americans consider him a war criminal who used military poison gases against the civilian population. Although lately, they don’t seem to be insisting on his immediate departure. Before the elections...
        2. +1
          10 December 2017 17: 43
          Vashcheta, after the bombed convoy we closed the sky to the entire coalition.
          There just aren't enough people...
          1. 0
            10 December 2017 18: 12
            Quote: sogdy
            After the bombed convoy, we closed the sky to the entire coalition.

            No... It was at the level of indignant “blah blah blah”... They flew and fly over all of Syria. They conduct electronic reconnaissance of the operation of our radars at both military bases. There was an agreement on separate operation of aviation on both banks of the Ephrata, so as not to bomb our “clients” and theirs by mistake. Although there, at mutual requests, they sometimes worked on both banks... It seems like they were “allies”. But now open hostility between the former “allies” may begin. And provocations from the American coalition... The force is on their side in the air... So they are greyhounds.
            1. 0
              11 December 2017 21: 02
              Quote: Fedya2017
              Quote: sogdy
              After the bombed convoy, we closed the sky to the entire coalition.

              No... It was at the level of indignant “blah blah blah”... They flew and fly over all of Syria. They conduct electronic reconnaissance of the operation of our radars at both military bases. There was an agreement on separate operation of aviation on both banks of the Ephrata, so as not to bomb our “clients” and theirs by mistake. Although there, at mutual requests, they sometimes worked on both banks... It seems like they were “allies”. But now open hostility between the former “allies” may begin. And provocations from the American coalition... The force is on their side in the air... So they are greyhounds.

              Arithmetic - they have so much, but for us - the little table - doesn’t work. It is enough to hook the only one, and it can come back to haunt the capital. To the fullest.
  58. 0
    10 December 2017 15: 40
    Quote: zhekazs
    One was definitely on a leash, which in safety glasses, in the last seconds of the video you can see the halyard going to the belt.

    This is the connection with the cockpit, what they hooked the halyard to, they didn’t have any harness, no helmet, or anything.
  59. 0
    10 December 2017 16: 53
    Did they care for us?
    And they transferred $$ to their children to live overseas.
  60. +2
    10 December 2017 17: 23
    I understand ... and it would also be worth the Americans to understand that it’s much easier to burn them in a nuclear war !!! wink Yes and it’s not a fact that we will finally be hurt if the Americans are crazy about us !!! wink laughing laughing laughing[/ Quote]
    You “finally” will not suffer - you will simply evaporate.
    In this war, which has been going on for a long time, Russia is losing absolutely. This war is called - economic competition of states
  61. +2
    10 December 2017 17: 25
    Nikolay the Greek,
    You “finally” will not suffer - you will simply evaporate.
    In this war, which has been going on for a long time, Russia is losing absolutely. This war is called - economic competition of states
  62. SOF
    0
    10 December 2017 23: 55
    Quote: a.sirin
    From the point of view of the amount of taxes that you pay to the country's budget, you and I - you eat from my palms

    wassat
    ...oooooh, master, taragoi? Have you been missing all this time?
    Your bed has been waiting for you, breadwinner laughing
    1. +1
      11 December 2017 00: 17
      Are you also a boor? Not too much talent for one... person?
      1. SOF
        0
        11 December 2017 18: 31
        ...and .....your face will not crack from delusions of grandeur, a breadwinner from a boat?
        1. +1
          13 December 2017 13: 59
          No, I think. And there is no mania, I pay taxes, and not small ones, at the time of the salary of everyone who works. Only now we are slowly withdrawing business from Russia, alas.
          There are too many of you.
          Or - not so: you and people like you have begun to influence too much
          1. +1
            13 December 2017 14: 01
            By the way, it wasn’t me who said about the “palm”. Like, “we” eat from the palm of our homeland.
            This is not true in principle: it is not the homeland that feeds the people, but the PEOPLE that feeds the homeland.
            That's right
  63. +1
    11 December 2017 00: 16
    Nikolay the Greek,
    We won't get hurt - we'll all die. And earlier than we could
  64. 0
    15 December 2017 12: 08
    These are the Pagans, these Yankees, from the Wayaks to the redheads

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"