Military Review

Golden calf above the Kremlin

169
So, it happened: Putin decided to go to the presidential elections in Russia in 2018 year. The intrigue "will go or not go" is over.




What was the reason for such a long pause? Questions to Putin about whether he will go to the polls have been asked repeatedly, but the president has kept a significant silence.

It was probably a difficult decision. In fact, being in power for eighteen years, it would be time to think about changing the scope of its activities. Yes, not so simple. The king is dancing retinue.

With the collapse of the Soviet Union, a new elite appeared in Russia. Having learned the taste of money and absolute power, she does not want to part with it. With unlimited funds, our new elite rushed to conquer the world. It turned out that the world is not waiting for her. The newly minted rich people clearly indicated the boundaries of their capabilities. Buy houses, teach children, and that's it. For the rest of the world elite, you are no one to call you. Your country is under external control. You will behave incorrectly, we will take away your riches, it is time to spit.

And here our elitushka became thoughtful. Yeltsin, who was in power, could not help. It became clear that without a strong state that has weight on the world stage, our rich will always be pariahs for the rest of the world. They thought, thought, and changed the president.

Of course, Putin does not take away what he has done for the country, and no one detracts from his successes. Russia really returned to the club of leading powers. But all this is not for the country, as such, and not for you and me, the common people. Everything is done for the prosperity and self-satisfaction of our ruling elite.

Why did we go to war in Syria? To protect Assad or preserve its territorial integrity? No matter how wrong! Through Syria, it was supposed to stretch the gas pipeline from Qatar to Western Europe, and this is a huge loss of our gas lobby. Why climbed to Ukraine? A threat to the geopolitical position of our country or a loss for business and gas supplies to Western Europe? Who supplies Ukraine with diesel fuel and buys real estate on the cheap? The answers are obvious. What is the greatness of the country, it's just a business.

Seventy percent of people in the Russian Federation do not live, but survive. Salaries in the public sector do not hold water. There is no work. People are impoverished. And our prime minister is broadcasting how wonderful and wonderful everything is. The ruling class (yes, yes, it already exists) is terribly far from the majority of the Russian people.

They simply do not imagine the life of ordinary people. This was colorfully told to us by the former Minister Ulyukayev in his last word (I recommend reading). I remember the times of the castling of Medvedev’s power on Putin. Nashe Radio conducts a live poll. “Would you like Medvedev to become mayor of your city?” A resident of Sterlitamak said that Mr. Medvedev does not understand anything in the management of the city and will ruin everything, he is a cabinet lawyer, so let him sit as prime minister.

In the Soviet Union there were a lot of remarkable achievements and decisions. Unfortunately, building a power vertical, our rulers take the worst. We sat Kremlin elders to the grave as Secretary General, and we will do the same. And what if a new “king” chases us with a filthy broom, because he has his own lures, no, let ours be sitting. There were all the officials on the hook of the party and the KGB, and ours will be. Only we are more cunning. We will build legislation so that, without violating it, the official will not be able to perform his functional duties and due to this he is always on the hook. Let us confuse the law to such an extent that anyone can be both justified and imprisoned. Not for nothing all the municipal authorities rushed to arrange between themselves and the real activity various laying in the form of offices, and after them the real municipal enterprises and other structures. At the municipal level, an incredible number of various exaggerated events, parades, celebrations, holidays are held and bravura reports, reports, reports are sent to the top. There is no real activity at any level of government. Everywhere the presentation of wonderful performance and achievements. What this led the Soviet Union to, everyone remembers very well.

In the USSR, ideology was the guiding force. In the Russian Federation, the guiding force is money, money and again money.

The country does not mind that V. V. Putin will go on to his next term in office. Because, unfortunately, there are no real competitors.

How to convey to our government what is actually happening? How to make so that the power of professing the golden calf, turned to people? Maybe, just no one will go to these elections? And then at least something will change in the minds of our new boyars.
Author:
169 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. vladimirvn
    vladimirvn 9 December 2017 15: 06
    10
    ..Why did we go to war in Syria? To protect Assad or preserve its territorial integrity? No matter how! It was supposed to stretch a pipeline through Syria from Qatar to Western Europe, and this is a colossal loss of our gas lobby. Why climbed into Ukraine? ..
    I still have not found a clear explanation for myself, why is the Crimean bridge being built? Maybe the event is also from this chain?
    1. Zibelew
      Zibelew 9 December 2017 15: 08
      22
      Quote: vladimirvn
      I still have not found a clear explanation for myself, why is the Crimean bridge being built?

      In Crimea, a couple of millions of Russians live and stand the Black Sea Fleet. The number of personnel of the Black Sea Fleet by the spring of 2014 was 25 people. Less than 000 thousand people left Ukraine from the 18 thousandth Crimean APU group to Ukraine, which also confirms the Russian character of the peninsula.

      1. vladimirvn
        vladimirvn 9 December 2017 15: 09
        17
        Knowing our pragmatic power, this is not an argument for her. Here is money, very big money or geopolitics. And ultimately, money is all the same.
        1. Chertt
          Chertt 9 December 2017 15: 14
          15
          Quote: vladimirvn
          I know our pragmatic power, this is not an argument for it.

          And you know for sure, or the voices tell you that you know. Your malice is visible, no knowledge
        2. Zibelew
          Zibelew 9 December 2017 15: 23
          +4
          Quote: vladimirvn
          Knowing our pragmatic power, this is not an argument for her. Here is money, very big money or geopolitics. And ultimately, money is all the same.

          Well, not everything in money is measured.
          1. syndicalist
            syndicalist 9 December 2017 15: 42
            33
            In Crimea and the Donbass, ours instantly responded to a hypothetical threat to the Russians. In Turkmenistan and other Central Asian republics, there has been a real defeat in the rights of Russian speakers, and so what? I’m not talking about “tanks in Tashkent,” but have we announced at least one note? No, we kiss passionately and discuss joint business projects
            1. SRC P-15
              SRC P-15 9 December 2017 16: 03
              +8
              It became clear that without a strong state that has weight on the world stage, our rich will always be pariahs for the rest of the world. We thought, thought, and replaced the president.

              Well, the state has become strong, it has weight on the world stage, but our rich people turn out to be as they were, and have remained "pariahs" for the rest of the world! What now they can’t "think" and change the president? The current “rich” have become much richer, and therefore stronger ?! But they can't do it, why? Yes, because Putin is not subject to them! And it was not they who put Putin in power, but completely different people - those who were not indifferent to the fate of Russia. I am sure that the "former" KGB officers had a hand here. And Putin, as is known from among them and his entourage, also has roots there. So, dear author, you are exaggerating the role of the "rich" in strengthening Russia. On the contrary, at the command of Putin, they are racing to fulfill his "request" to help the country with finances. And it is precisely such a president, who holds the oligarchs in the hedgehogs, that our country needs.
              1. groks
                groks 9 December 2017 17: 03
                30
                It is clear that the election of President Putin is approaching, but it’s not necessary to write such nonsense.
                Messages from the president have already become synonymous with the first Chinese. So it is also made public, i.e. they poke his nose publicly, stressing to the whole world that he is nobody.
                Inside the country, just kirdyk is approaching. The Foreign Ministry no longer even expresses concern in response to direct insults.
                It seems that some very powerful force, world-class, is playing along with our elite. Trying to push them to meaningful actions to reanimate the country, substituting the West, wherever possible. But not a damn thing. Our power stubbornly drives us to the Maidan, as if this is their goal.
                1. KAV
                  KAV 11 December 2017 23: 21
                  +1
                  Oh, how many plunders gathered here! Right crying wall resting! Well, all-scribblers, wash your puny carcasses with divine tears! The complete idiocy! Right now, so many fairy tales are being invented under the topic of the entry of GDP to the elections, that Mom Don't Cry!
                  One thing is interesting to me. Where did so much g * o * b * n * u * k * o * b come out ??? It was quiet for several years. And then, all of a sudden, like gremlins, out of nowhere ... A whole shobla!
                  Fuck you all to hell from my country! Together with your values ​​and demonocracy! Blow into your adored FSA satellite countries and howl at the moon! Already got it all!
                  With what x * p * e * n * a comparison of the USSR and present-day Russia ?! Where did the author get 70% of the "surviving" ?! What kind of attraction of facts to the scrotum ?! The main abuse of the author that the whole point is money! And what, he’s eating the holy spirit, probably? And the Internet pays them, through which crap on our President ?! The author on the soap!
                  1. groks
                    groks 12 December 2017 08: 06
                    +5
                    And where are you from - living in parallel reality or writing propaganda for money? Jumping at the mention of the name of the president.
                    I. This is our country. And we are offended when she is so stupidly ruined.
                    There will be more comparisons with the USSR as the situation in the Russian Federation worsens.
                    70% don't like it? We have two enterprises of 500 people leaving for BS in January. Here from there.
                    1. astronom1973n
                      astronom1973n 13 December 2017 07: 01
                      +1
                      Quote: groks
                      And where are you from - living in parallel reality or writing propaganda for money? Jumping at the mention of the name of the president.
                      I. This is our country. And we are offended when she is so stupidly ruined.
                      There will be more comparisons with the USSR as the situation in the Russian Federation worsens.
                      70% don't like it? We have two enterprises of 500 people leaving for BS in January. Here from there.

                      In the 90s, under Yeltsin, there were no salaries, no pensions, someone squeaked? No, probably because there was no Internet and there was nowhere to fart from the importance, I agree that there are enough problems. Once again I turn to the dissatisfied with the question and who is the alternative, with the surname please! Ksyu, Navalny or ... Zhirinovsky? Who?
                      1. groks
                        groks 13 December 2017 16: 29
                        +1
                        Everyone squeaked. I worked in 5 (five) places, the wind shook me and I squeaked too. But there was nowhere to go.
                        And now the difference. In the 90s, decline was created artificially. The mismatch of the money supply, as a result, is simply the impossibility of financial interaction. As an example. This could be overcome simply by a strong-willed decision. But now it’s not so. The situation has been brought to such a state that it is very difficult to change something - there will inevitably be a powerful decline in wealth. It is not enough just to take the yacht from Abramovich. I am simply amazed at the talent of those who, after 1917, were able to make industry move. And he did not let the country die of hunger and cold. Here again, there is a difference - in 1917 our country was more independent than now. Farmers honestly say that almost all of our seeds are western. Just starve to death.
                        And do not about Navlny, Zhirinovsky, and about Zyuganov, too. They are the same opposition as I am a Chinese pilot.
                  2. askme
                    askme 13 December 2017 00: 34
                    +1
                    Yes, such shit is not the majority, but a lot, do not pay attention to them. These shitheads were sitting on their priests exactly, mocking the situation when their country was falling apart, the USSR.
                    These bastards in the 90s stupidly viciously, creating different villains in those conditions. Now they again find fault with what is already there. They are not the majority. And the minority is smelly to the extreme. But this will pass) The article is petty, petty little soul written ...
                    1. groks
                      groks 13 December 2017 13: 57
                      +1
                      shit

                      shit

                      This is in one post .... Okay, I’m silent that, according to psychiatrists, fecal vocabulary is a sign of hidden homosexuality. This is a personal matter for everyone, the article was canceled.
                      But. Whoever doesn’t really like modern power, they behave decently, for the most part, and until they withdraw. They give some arguments - why they do not like all this. Do not be rude. But as soon as it comes to the propagandists of EdRa (paid, since it is impossible to interpret behavior differently) and the patriots of the oligarchs (because the patriots of the Motherland do not stand so stiffly for those who plunder the Motherland) - an insulting rod, absolutely no arguments are given.
                      Most precious, have you not sat upright? You fought a mortal battle for ... but for what you fought? After all, you think that the current mess is good. Do you like the power of the oligarchy? Well, it turns out. Do you like the robbery of the people by the oligarchs, do you like the destruction of the remnants of industry and the aftermath of the remnants of the Soviet era? Well, on whose side were you fighting?
              2. Nick
                Nick 10 December 2017 16: 36
                +2
                Quote: СРЦ П-15
                And it was not they who put Putin in power, but completely different people - those who were not indifferent to the fate of Russia. I am sure that the "former" KGB officers had a hand here. And Putin, as is known from among them and his entourage, also has roots there.

                At the initial stage, yes. And in 12, the people approved it, by an overwhelming majority. And this enabled V.V. Putin is somewhat expanding the boundaries of his capabilities, becoming less dependent on centers of power. And in March next year, we, ordinary citizens need to repeat what we did in the 12 year, Support the GDP with the maximum possible number of votes.
                1. SRC P-15
                  SRC P-15 10 December 2017 17: 04
                  +3
                  Quote: Nick
                  And in March next year, we, ordinary citizens, need to repeat what we did in the 12th year, Support the GDP with the maximum possible number of votes.

                  I am glad that the number of my supporters is growing! drinks hi
                  1. Nick
                    Nick 11 December 2017 04: 52
                    +2
                    Quote: СРЦ П-15
                    I am glad that the number of my supporters is growing!

                    We are supporters of GDP. Therefore, your views are close to me.
                    Sincerely ... hi
        3. svp67
          svp67 9 December 2017 15: 50
          +1
          Quote: vladimirvn
          Here is money, very big money or geopolitics. And ultimately, money is all the same.

          Here is the same for me, "Newton’s bin." Politics always has a connection with money, and the more politics, the more there is ... otherwise, no matter how.
          1. Per se.
            Per se. 9 December 2017 23: 04
            +2
            Quote: svp67
            Politics always has a connection with money and the more politics there are, the more there are ... but otherwise.
            All right, but the question is money over politics, or politics over money. What did Stalin have, which billions? For which Peter I did not regret himself, he could drive a noodle, but with requisitions to fill his pockets for himself ... The article has common sense, but for a proper understanding of the role and place of Putin, first you need to understand the main thing, if he can now, and what he wants. If he is for the people, he remains in his heart a communist and a KGB officer, being a "real colonel", he will have to rely on Russia on socialist lines, relying on the army and the people. If he is a friend of the oligarchs, and the communist in him "won the dragon", there will be only attempts with the old oligarchs to squeeze out a share from the owners of capitalism, in whose system Russia got into. The latter is fraught with difficulty, it is impossible, being in a strange pole of power and playing by someone else’s rules, to win in this “casino”, and to build a kind of “parallel capitalism” in Russia, under the rule of dependent bad guys, that is, our homegrown princes, utopia, which is even worse. We, not China, which was given to rise only in order that sooner or later he would destroy Russia. Paradoxically, the West itself does everything for Russia to return to socialism, to revive the power pole independent of world capitalism. With or without Putin, this will be done, for Russia it is a matter of life and death, the Soviet safety margin is running out, and with the bourgeois, Russia will slip into what happened during tsarism, if not worse, with the world already divided and the capitalist world leader system, its rules, under this host created.
            1. Rico1977
              Rico1977 10 December 2017 14: 54
              +3
              Does Putin have millions? AND? Find and show. The librarians and commies are yelling (in fact they are very similar and they pay Americans equally). You are 20 years old, all the world's special services are looking for his money. Have you found? No. Because there are none of them and about what Putin will do there - he is the only one who knows what to do and does
              1. Mordvin 3
                Mordvin 3 10 December 2017 15: 04
                +7
                Quote: Rico1977
                he only knows what to do

                Of course the only one. Until he opened his mouth for the position of the Olympics, Mutko and Zhukov were silent, and then they immediately began to express their "position". Zhukov had already agreed so far that the Americans were pushing us to boycott the OI, but we were going to mow them in the morning and we would be flying the Olympic flag.
              2. Per se.
                Per se. 11 December 2017 05: 50
                +2
                Quote: Rico1977
                Shouting libirasty and commies (in fact, they are very similar and they pay the Americans equally)
                "Kommunyaki" ... Valeria Novodvorskaya's soul, by chance, did not move in, I wonder, but what "... yaks" do you consider yourself to be? For me, if you did not read very carefully, so Putin remained a Communist, at least, so far I hope so. From Zyuganov, and I am not happy. As for the rest, there is nothing to talk about, bang is not a topic.
        4. antivirus
          antivirus 9 December 2017 19: 03
          +3
          But can power be not pragmatic?
          and what else could be ?????
          1. Dart2027
            Dart2027 9 December 2017 19: 14
            +1
            Quote: antivirus
            and what else could be

            Ideologized.
          2. Radikal
            Radikal 9 December 2017 19: 23
            +6
            Maybe folk?wassat
        5. Nick
          Nick 10 December 2017 16: 25
          0
          Quote: vladimirvn
          Knowing our pragmatic power, this is not an argument for her

          Sorry, but! The degree of knowledge, its depth, may be different. Much depends on the level of awareness, intellectual capabilities and the level of analytical ability of the individual. Depending on the conditions listed above, the conclusions may be diametrically opposite. Alas... hi
      2. vladimirvn
        vladimirvn 9 December 2017 15: 18
        +5
        Yes, there are few places in the world where Russians live and suffer hardships. In the republics of Central Asia and the Caucasus, the Baltic states, for example. In the Donbass, by the way, the same is not enough. And about knowledge in more detail. Discover my true motives. Maybe I will believe.
      3. bandabas
        bandabas 9 December 2017 21: 48
        +1
        And how many Russians are there in Ukraine? Or in Kazakhstan, Lithuania and so on?
    2. 210ox
      210ox 9 December 2017 15: 15
      +1
      No, not from that chain .. And from the logistic .. yes .
      Quote: vladimirvn
      ..Why did we go to war in Syria? To protect Assad or preserve its territorial integrity? No matter how! It was supposed to stretch a pipeline through Syria from Qatar to Western Europe, and this is a colossal loss of our gas lobby. Why climbed into Ukraine? ..
      I still have not found a clear explanation for myself, why is the Crimean bridge being built? Maybe the event is also from this chain?
    3. svp67
      svp67 9 December 2017 16: 07
      +8
      Quote: vladimirvn
      I still have not found a clear explanation for myself, why is the Crimean bridge being built?

      And you will go to the Crimea on a personal car and you will understand MUCH MUCH. I, personally, I am FOR the Crimean Bridge. And only glad that my interests, perhaps even by accident, laughing coincided with someone's monetary interests.
      1. Overlock
        Overlock 9 December 2017 16: 47
        +2
        I go to the Crimea in a car 2 times a year for 18 years. By land, it was calmer. On a ferry, it depends on the weather. In time, movement by land and by ferry is comparable (+ - 2 hours). How over the bridge? I do not know. Travel time? I don’t know. But knowing what winters on the Black Sea there are questions. Strong winds with high humidity are ideal conditions for ice. I believe that this problem has been solved by scientists and road workers.
        Wait and see.
      2. krops777
        krops777 9 December 2017 17: 09
        13
        And you will go to the Crimea on a personal car and you will understand MUCH MUCH. I, personally, I am FOR the Crimean Bridge.

        And I do not mind, but why was it taken away from the Yakuts, everything was ready for the construction of a bridge across the Lena. (You will go to Yakutsk on a personal car and you will understand MUCH MUCH)
        1. Nehist
          Nehist 10 December 2017 10: 58
          +2
          And we also want a bridge on Sakhalin ... And everyone promises and promises to us: (((And here, we also sawed off 15 billion evergreens from the regional budget to the federal budget exactly before the elections ...
    4. Sling cutter
      Sling cutter 9 December 2017 17: 48
      21
      Quote: vladimirvn
      Why climbed into Ukraine? ..
      I still have not found a clear explanation for myself, why is the Crimean bridge being built? Maybe the event is also from this chain?

      In general, Ukraine turned out to be a testing ground and here are a few aspects:
      1. To finally consolidate the dismemberment of the USSR, in particular, to separate the single Russian people, as the core of the Union, into three hostile components. It has not yet been rolled with Belarus, and the republic itself is small, resourceless, a united nation, well, Old Man.
      With Ukraine, everything is different, the huge human, industrial, mining, energy, territorial and geographical potential, in the event of reunification with the Russian Federation, in any form, actually restored the Empire. But world imperialism, including our and Ukrainian compradors, could not allow this to happen. It is obvious that until 2014 in the person of Ukraine, we had, if not directly friendly, then quite a loyal state, and, most importantly, had friendly people.
      Divorce is forever, it’s best to fasten it with blood, and they started pouring it, like from a faucet.
      If someone says that the Kremlin could not influence the course of the Kiev coup, it’s a lie! (And, hypothetically, it could have participated).
      2. Crimea, in the case of certain agreements, a very favorable card for all parties.
      A.) In / on the outskirts we are an aggressor, in which case, the authorities will always say the Russian Federation is to blame for everything in the decline in living standards, in the collapse of industry, and even in poor harvests ..
      b.) We have the outskirts - now the eternal bugel. “Do you want, how on the outskirts?”, “Do you want Maidan,” “parasail is a subhuman -blood,” well, + is another enemy. And like this 24 hours a day for 3 years, in a row.
      By the way, both here and in them, propaganda works in a mirror way.
      And sometimes there is a deju vu, if you remove the names and propaganda pictures, it is not clear what country they are broadcasting about.
      3) Donbass is a bargaining chip for the imperialists, reinforcing the bloody divorce of the two republics, like an unhealed wound. You can of course say that something went wrong in the Donbass (for the authorities), Red Flags, social project - Democracy - Russian World -Novorossiya. But all this is simply merged by skillful schemers, and odious personalities are eliminated.
      A striking example is not the taking of Mariupol.

      Conclusion: of the whole situation in pluses, all participants in this geopolitical catastrophe, from the oligarch-camprador bourgeoisie and the closely connected world imperialism with them. Principle: Divide and conquer - made in the "best traditions" of the world behind the scenes and their representatives.
      Py-sy: And the bridge? Well, the bridge ..., his estimate was at first 50 lard, then the waste, in the terminal it will come out in 450 - nothing personal, only business.
      By the way, traffic on the bridge will be paid and it is unlikely that the fare will be cheaper than the ferry. "Plato" rules.
      Capitalism, however ....
      1. Sling cutter
        Sling cutter 9 December 2017 18: 05
        +5
        Quote: Stroporez
        Conclusion: of the whole situation in pluses, all participants in this geopolitical catastrophe, from the oligarch-camprador bourgeoisie and the closely connected world imperialism with them.

        EXCEPT PEOPLE, of course. (did not finish in the heat of attack)
      2. Dart2027
        Dart2027 9 December 2017 19: 16
        +1
        Sorry, but who created Ukraine?
        1. Sling cutter
          Sling cutter 9 December 2017 20: 26
          +5
          Quote: Dart2027
          Sorry, but who created Ukraine?

          Forgive repeat
          On March 17, 1917, the Central Council was established in / in Ukraine - an elected center of many parties and organizations. Its chairman was Mikhail Grushevsky. The Council convened the All-Ukrainian People's Congress, which proclaimed the Ukrainian People's Republic. On November 20, 1917, the Central Council declared the Ukrainian People's Republic - the UPR, which included Kiev, Chernihiv, Volyn, Podolia, Poltava, Kharkov, Yekaterinoslav, Kherson and Tavria.
          The Bolsheviks had nothing to do with this !!!
          1. Dart2027
            Dart2027 9 December 2017 22: 02
            +1
            Quote: Stroporez
            On March 17, 1917, the Central Council was created in / in Ukraine
            which was an empty place that essentially did not solve anything.
            Who really created Ukraine and pursued a policy of Ukrainization of the population?
      3. Vadim237
        Vadim237 9 December 2017 20: 31
        +2
        "Well, what is the bridge ..., his estimate was first 50 lard" - When was she 50? 230 billion - yes it was, in the same place, not one bridge is being built, but two are railway and automobile.
        1. Sling cutter
          Sling cutter 9 December 2017 22: 48
          +1
          Quote: Vadim237
          When was she 50? 230 billion - yes it was, in the same place, not one bridge is being built, but two are railway and automobile.

          Greetings, see the chronology .....
          By the time you write about, the estimate was 211, then 223 and 4,78 to the contractor. And you see how the tender was won hi
      4. Suhov
        Suhov 10 December 2017 01: 16
        +1
        Quote: Stroporez
        A striking example is not the taking of Mariupol.

        If they took Mariupol, there would be no water in Donetsk, and of course in Mariupol taken ... smile
        Maybe that's why they did not take it? hi
        1. Sling cutter
          Sling cutter 10 December 2017 01: 23
          +1
          Quote: Sukhov
          If they took Mariupol, there would be no water in Donetsk, and of course in Mariupol taken ...

          You sketched me laughing Was "Comrade Sukhov" good
          If, yes, if only, they would still drink water “on Privoz.” (I said for Odessa). belay
        2. vasya.pupkin
          vasya.pupkin 10 December 2017 12: 38
          +5
          For Sukhov: Mariupol was "not taken" for another reason. In the 14th, our militiamen were already walking along the Vostochny microdistrict, but then an order came from the Zakhar to let them all go 20 km. They executed the order go away ...
          The fact is that in Mariupol there is a metallurgical plant R, Akhmetova, and that one in M. has a friendship, "looking" for Donbass A.A. Dudaev / drove V.U. Surkov /, you know, they are "friends houses "in London.
          So this is not enough, in the 15th marmot, he came up with a demilitarization chip and made his puppet go from Mariupol to go even further and give P. Shirokino and 6 more important points for free.
          It was for such "procedures" that it was necessary to expel the national hero of NEW RUSSIA I. Strelkov.
          Today, if Mariupol were in the Dnieper, we could send our coal even to Turkey. So, "Comrade Sukhov, take your precious ass off the couch and come to us, you will learn a lot.
          1. Sling cutter
            Sling cutter 10 December 2017 13: 33
            +3
            Quote: vasya.pupkin
            Today, if Mariupol were in the Dnieper, we could send our coal even to Turkey

            Thanks for the comment, Colleague hi
            An important role was played by the Mariupol port, or rather those to whom it belongs.
            You wrote correctly about Ahmetka, but in his business there is still a "small share" of the Rassian oligarchy. And one more circumstance, Mariupol is the "key" to Zaporozhye, and then "Kakhovka, Kakhovka is a native rifle" and Kherson - Nikolaev- Odessa-Tiraspol — not only the bridge is not needed here, but also the outskirts of kirdyk.
            But then the tomfoolery and barking rose, they say we just paid for Crimea, which was really for Ukraine, like a suitcase without a handle, and you take such a bold piece from us? !!! And most importantly, what if all this territory really becomes popular and independent, and with such a prom. potential and infrastructure, it’s quite realistic. The only thought that the People’s Socialist Republic of Novorossia appears will terrify the bourgeois. In this situation, Kuev would not have lasted a year. And then, God forbid, looking at New Russia, freedom-loving moods will wake up in Russia and everything, a kapets of the newly-minted bourgeoisie.
            That’s what the “garn claps” thought of. And then everything was technically “poured with concrete”.
            As Yura Shevchuk sings "I drank yesterday with the general ..." hi
    5. trampoline instructor
      trampoline instructor 9 December 2017 19: 39
      0
      It is strange to me that a person who is not able to learn the rules of the Russian language is trying to build some kind of chain here.
      1. Sling cutter
        Sling cutter 9 December 2017 20: 15
        +8
        Quote: Trampoline area instructor
        It’s strange for me that a person who is not able to learn the rules of the Russian language

        I am not a linguist or editor of wall newspapers, and in a hurry. Thank you for the comment. Russian written, I "pull up."
        Quote: Trampoline area instructor
        trying to build some chains here.

        If you have something to say, say it, but just like that ..., it’s not clear why to puff?
        1. trampoline instructor
          trampoline instructor 13 December 2017 07: 23
          0
          What I wanted to say, I said.
          And about the "wad" - so it is in your part. Enough to view the tape.
    6. Rico1977
      Rico1977 10 December 2017 14: 47
      +3
      Bullshit and not an article. Putin went to the polls for only one reason - there is no one to hand over power so far. And the money in the head of the author of the article judges by itself. Putin for the state is insulting. He can afford any move, but he is guided by only one thing - the interests of Russia. There is nothing more for him. And everything that he does, he does so that Russia develops evolutionarily, without shocks, without blood. So that such narrow-minded throats as the author, as well as his opponents, do not clutch each other's throats and blood does not spill. Because any fight inside the country will be the end of Russia. They’ll finish us right away. And if someone does not understand this, then he is DB. Putin is as simple as 5 cents. The development of the country without shocks, without blood. Yes, you can like Stalin drive the opposition, or such as the author in prison and shoot. And it will be quiet. But he d .. says - let's live together with .. so finally. Enough of each other to destroy the Russian. You live peacefully at last, work for the good of our common country. And thank God that the people understand this. And such as the author, the gorlopans scream all of Stalin on you. Yes, you, the first screamers who were bad under Stalin, would have been shot as critics of the authorities and the party’s solely loyal line, no matter what they did. Putin must be supported and trusted. In the entire history of Russia, this is the best ruler of our long-suffering country.
    7. Motherland Russia
      Motherland Russia 10 December 2017 15: 44
      0
      I apologize, but the article is complete "Nonsense" ...
      Moments:
      - leave the country when ahead of the test, can only ...;
      “President, real man.”
  2. Chertt
    Chertt 9 December 2017 15: 10
    +5
    I made it a rule not to criticize the author "in general", but to dispute specific points. But here is some sort of set of spiteful, template phrases. Flavored with the praise of the USSR (who would argue)
    1. jjj
      jjj 9 December 2017 15: 50
      +2
      People work out the allocated grants until they are requested back
      1. passing
        passing 9 December 2017 17: 29
        +3
        People work out the allocated grants until they are requested back

        then see how the majority relates to your ..
  3. g1v2
    g1v2 9 December 2017 15: 14
    10
    Intrigue existed only in the imagination of experts. If Putin did not intend to go to the polls, he would have announced the name of the receiver and began to spin it for a long time. I think that in the new term, GDP will just begin to train and train its successor. And as for pulling, so the later you declare, the later they will begin to attack you. Moreover, there is no need to conduct some kind of sharp election campaign. Everyone already knows everything. And he will gain 60 percent or 70 does not play a role. request
    Well, and so the article is an ordinary propaganda chatter. Especially about 70 percent of survivors put in. Probably when I wrote a tear let go? Just so little. Write 90 - do not spare the keys. wink
    1. Chertt
      Chertt 9 December 2017 15: 25
      +1
      Quote: g1v2
      Especially about 70 percent of survivors put in. Probably when I wrote a tear let go? Just so little. Write 90 - do not spare the keys.

      used to say "the paper will endure" now "the keys will endure"
    2. svp67
      svp67 9 December 2017 15: 53
      11
      Quote: g1v2
      I think that in the new term, GDP will just begin to train and train its successor.

      This is already evident from the personnel policy that is now taking place in the power structures ... He is not only preparing a receiver for himself, but also a whole "fighting detachment" of people personally PERSONAL for him with his exaltation and entry into power.
      1. Svidetel 45
        Svidetel 45 9 December 2017 23: 35
        +3
        It’s too slowly preparing PERSONALLY loyal to him, and is it still a big question that Stalin has prepared, "cleaned up" the elite and put the country on its feet, although not without costs, and now, under Putin, how many openly hostile elements are so free they feel, as if still in the 10s, that's why they treat Russia and the West insolently, they see. that around the country and the state are their agents of influence.
        1. KAV
          KAV 11 December 2017 23: 44
          0
          Quote: Svidetel 45
          For 10 years, Stalin prepared, "cleaned up" the elite and put the country on its feet, although not without cost.

          Under Stalin, the country's constitution was the same as it is now ?! Under Stalin, everything was the same as now ?! Economics, politics, government ?!
          Do not carry nonsense! If you want to sound smart - keep silent!
    3. Sotskiy
      Sotskiy 9 December 2017 15: 53
      +9
      Quote: g1v2
      If Putin did not intend to go to the polls, he would have announced the name of the receiver and began to spin it for a long time.

      But what about fair and democratic elections? What are the receivers in a democratic society, huh? lol
      Shaw, now the "decision on the appointment" will be taken by the Central Committee of the EP? laughing Plagiarized lol
  4. assa67
    assa67 9 December 2017 15: 21
    12
    live broadcast of "echo of Moscow" or "rain" ...
    Quote: Chertt
    set of spiteful, template phrases

    yes, gas went to Syria to defend their interests, not without it ... but the fact that the igil brought up with mattresses was going to advance to our borders, the author didn’t mention something .... and about Ukraine ... I personally don’t want Bandera scum trampled our land. yes that there, in general it was not
    1. sa-ag
      sa-ag 9 December 2017 15: 31
      +6
      Quote: assa67
      gas went to Syria defending their interests, not without it ...

      A purely imperialist approach - for the sake of corporation interest, mix the country with land
      1. assa67
        assa67 9 December 2017 15: 39
        10
        eva how! Russia came to Syria after the blows of the United States and the formation of igil .... and what is there (Syria, Libya, Iraq) the coalition is doing, as it does not try to grab gas and oil of the whole region? .... you, dear, reproach Russia in a militaristic approach? ... gentlemen, for centuries you have been robbing the whole world, promoting democracy on your bayonets
        1. sa-ag
          sa-ag 9 December 2017 15: 47
          +4
          Quote: assa67
          eva how!

          Egezh, in 2012 a man whose name cannot be called, said that Syria is not our ally and our interests are not there
          1. assa67
            assa67 9 December 2017 16: 06
            +4
            there was a time when Assad tried to "turn" to the west ... but to be an ally of the people who bring light, prosperity and democracy means unquestioning obedience .. and taking into account what happened in Iraq and Libya, the position changed ... well, I don’t want Assad repeat the fate of Saddam and Gaddafi ...
            Quote: sa-ag
            for the sake of corporation interest mix country with land

            look at what the once prosperous Jacob and Libya turned into with your efforts
            1. sa-ag
              sa-ag 9 December 2017 16: 12
              +5
              Quote: assa67
              look at what the once prosperous Jacob and Libya turned into with your efforts

              Yes? And who of the Russian authorities there agreed with the fate of Libya do not recall?
              "Well, I do not want Assad to repeat the fate of Saddam and Gaddafi ..."
              This did not threaten him, he was a stranger, lived in the UK, worked as an ophthalmologist, was quite a pro-Western person, he even at first agreed to Qatar's proposals in 2009. But then they called from the Kremlin and offered their roof to replace the refusal, Assad, not experienced in He believed in politics, and now he really faces the fate of the above, everyone will make him extreme. including the Kremlin
              1. assa67
                assa67 9 December 2017 16: 21
                +8
                and at your fingertips, apparently, an archive of power holders with signatures and seals .... and, in addition, it doesn’t matter who said what at that time, and WHO did it all ... your star-striped masters don’t give a damn about UN resolutions, notes of protest .... on everything except their interests ....
                1. sa-ag
                  sa-ag 9 December 2017 16: 24
                  +4
                  Quote: assa67
                  and, in addition, it doesn’t matter who said what at that time

                  This is just very important, especially if it says the first person of the state
                  1. assa67
                    assa67 9 December 2017 16: 32
                    +7
                    in this case, what can we say about your leaders? ... throughout the day, statements change to diametrically opposite .... your Russophobia and one-sidedness are tired, I apologize .... good luck in this field
                    1. Ulan
                      Ulan 9 December 2017 20: 22
                      +2
                      How do I remember. Trump - I want to build relations with Russia. Established, worse than under Obama.
                  2. KAV
                    KAV 11 December 2017 23: 50
                    0
                    Quote: sa-ag
                    It’s just very important especially if it says the first person of the state

                    Oily ??! And let's remember what your first person in the state said, and what did you do after that ?! Whose cow would moo ... !!!
                2. Overlock
                  Overlock 9 December 2017 16: 56
                  +4
                  President Dmitry Medvedev and Prime Minister Vladimir Putin have publicly argued about the international operation in Libya. The prime minister called the UN resolution “inferior and flawed”: “All this reminds me of a medieval call for a crusade.” Thus, Putin actually repeated the words of Muammar Gaddafi, who stated that a “crusade” had been declared against his country.

                  Medvedev’s reaction was almost immediate. The president called for accuracy in evaluations. And he warned that “in no case is it unacceptable to use expressions that, in essence, lead to a clash of civilizations, such as“ crusades ”and so on. This is unacceptable. Otherwise, everything can end much worse than even this is happening today. And everyone should remember this. ”
                  https://svpressa.ru/politic/article/40816/
            2. Sotskiy
              Sotskiy 10 December 2017 00: 21
              +1
              Quote: assa67
              look at what the once prosperous Jacob and Libya turned into with your efforts

              Dear, you are the first thing a European (civilized) country, such as Yugoslavia forgot. There, the country was re-democratized after the democratized USSR. And you are about Africa and the Middle East.
              1. assa67
                assa67 10 December 2017 16: 54
                +5
                not at all .. didn’t forget .. just the conversation with the opponent was about BV ...
      2. svp67
        svp67 9 December 2017 15: 55
        +2
        Quote: sa-ag
        A purely imperialist approach - for the sake of corporation interest, mix the country with land

        Welcome to the real world. Here it’s at least understandable for what, and not for some EPHEMICAL political goals, when HUGE money was invested in a foreign country and when it ceased to suit its leadership, it easily passed under the wing of the United States ... and we remained “not salty”
        1. sa-ag
          sa-ag 9 December 2017 16: 15
          0
          Quote: svp67
          Here it’s at least understandable for what, and not for some EPHEMICAL political goals, when HUGE money was invested in a foreign country and when it ceased to suit its leadership, it easily passed under the wing of the USA

          Ephemeral goals? Thanks to this work, there was a safety belt in the west and no, but allies. and now there’s no money at all, but you need to invest money, for example, the United States does that and has support (some kind) around the world
        2. Sotskiy
          Sotskiy 10 December 2017 00: 29
          0
          Quote: svp67
          HUGE money, and when it ceased to suit its leadership, it easily passed under the wing of the USA ... and we remained "not saltyly slurping"

          Did it make it easier for you?
          Previously, for a lot of money, we were not cheated at the Olympics and did not remove our flags. Or do you think that our "effective managers" saved a lot of money for the people on this humiliation? laughing laughing laughing
          Get involved! They do not need people!
      3. Svidetel 45
        Svidetel 45 9 December 2017 23: 38
        +1
        Unfortunately, it’s not a “purely” imperialist approach, but we should have one, it’s time for us to stop being kind enough.
      4. kotvov
        kotvov 10 December 2017 11: 49
        +2
        Do you have a headache in the morning? I’ll tell you why they entered Syria to stop the chain of Arab springs, to stop the chaos of the collapse of countries, to destroy the militants who were being prepared to strike in the soft underbelly of Russia. by the way, soon everyone will either be circumcised or cut out.
  5. solzh
    solzh 9 December 2017 15: 23
    +3
    I completely agree with the author.
    Maybe it’s just that no one should go to this election? And then at least something will change in the minds of our new boyars

    You must go.
    1. Sotskiy
      Sotskiy 10 December 2017 00: 37
      +2
      .
      Quote: solzh
      You must go.

      I agree with vlad007 Yesterday, 15: 24
      The intrigue is not whether Putin will go to the polls, but how many people will come to the polls.
      And therefore, in general, will they be legitimate given the turnout? Let the oligarchy at least spend money on re-elections and support his candidate again. You look, and bankrupt fat cats! laughing
      1. Sling cutter
        Sling cutter 10 December 2017 00: 56
        +5
        Quote: Sovetskiy
        And therefore, in general, will they be legitimate given the turnout? Let the oligarchy at least spend money on re-elections and support his candidate again. You look, and bankrupt fat cats!

        Both in the past and the year before last they were not legitimate, to be honest, Duc since 1993, and then two to four by 4 and that's it ... or not all? They treat the Constitution as a “lease agreement”. Now 4, tomorrow they will change their mind, they will say 6 in two ....
        This is already beyond the scope of this, even in the "cards" by their concepts, busting.
        Everything is simplified so much that it becomes uncomfortable, I want to confuse everyone, thimbles, twist, twist, all.
  6. vlad007
    vlad007 9 December 2017 15: 24
    +7
    The intrigue is not whether Putin will go to the polls, but how many people will come to the polls.
    1. vladimirvn
      vladimirvn 9 December 2017 15: 32
      17
      He was recently an observer at the primaries of United Russia. Do not even hide fraud and stuffing. Everything is justified by political expediency and the need for stability. People are stable in shit, and they are stable at the top, with power and appropriated wealth.
      1. svp67
        svp67 9 December 2017 15: 56
        +2
        Quote: vladimirvn
        He was recently an observer at the primaries of United Russia. Do not even hide fraud and stuffing.

        Then the question is PERSONAL to you, but what are you just talking about now, why were there no noise?
        1. vladimirvn
          vladimirvn 9 December 2017 16: 03
          +7
          To make noise is to write against the wind. And then, I have this United Russia before .. Just once again I saw that the election system has not changed since Soviet times. And in all types of elections, she is one and the same.
          1. svp67
            svp67 9 December 2017 16: 10
            +3
            Quote: vladimirvn
            To make noise is to write against the wind. And then, I have this United Russia before ..

            Stop. And for what interest did you go there as an OBSERVER? And you don’t think that YOU HAVE ADDED your hand to the greatness of "EP", and now you are trying to pretend to be the "victim of the regime and system" ... Oh, not good.
            1. vladimirvn
              vladimirvn 9 December 2017 16: 27
              +9
              Sinful. Not good. :) The bosses ordered, we must go, and here we go. Still sick.
              1. Vadim237
                Vadim237 9 December 2017 20: 33
                +1
                Something a little weak in this is believed.
          2. kotvov
            kotvov 10 December 2017 11: 52
            0
            you just have to lie. I myself was an observer from the 90s. I participated in the calculations and according to the law of large numbers, the elections corresponded to what we counted. And if it was as you described, then you are a shame.
      2. Overlock
        Overlock 9 December 2017 17: 01
        12
        I throw a stone at your garden
        In beautiful ties dumb mutt!
        Why don’t you love people so much
        Feeding your “righteous” w. py?
        Who am I? I am an ordinary nurse.
        I live, I feed children on 10.300.
        And there is no longer hope for Christ.
        More and more often I remember the Communists ...
        Teacher, doctor - there is pride and honor ...
        The leader of the plant is honor and glory.
        Both to the resort and to the sanatorium every year
        The country sent its workers.
        And I'm sitting and crying. How do i live?
        I am not a lazy person, I am a citizen of Russia!
        I teach children to love my homeland,
        But here for what - they cannot explain to them ...

        https://ok.ru/yumormedik/topic/67561706427716
      3. Sotskiy
        Sotskiy 10 December 2017 00: 41
        0
        Quote: vladimirvn
        He was recently an observer at the primaries of United Russia. Do not even hide fraud and stuffing. Everything is justified by political expediency and the need for stability. People are stable in shit, and they are stable at the top, with power and appropriated wealth.

        This is stability in a new way! laughing Brezhnev got sick? Wanted a change? Well, here they are, new stability! laughing laughing laughing Damn, the mat on our people is not enough!
  7. sa-ag
    sa-ag 9 December 2017 15: 25
    13
    "... Because, unfortunately, there are no real competitors."
    They simply are not shown on TV, and since there is no plasma torch, then it doesn’t exist in nature either :-)
    1. kvarfax
      kvarfax 9 December 2017 15: 43
      +1
      interesting. And on the Internet they also do not show? Or can you name at least a couple?))
      1. sa-ag
        sa-ag 9 December 2017 15: 45
        +8
        Quote: kvarfax
        Or can you name at least a couple?))

        I’ll not name it, they themselves should not reach TV, but reach with their own heads
  8. Dart2027
    Dart2027 9 December 2017 15: 26
    0
    I would like to ask the author what he wants. In practice.
    1. Overlock
      Overlock 9 December 2017 17: 02
      +7
      in my opinion, social justice or its likeness, at least
      1. Dart2027
        Dart2027 9 December 2017 17: 43
        0
        Quote: Overlock
        social justice or its likeness

        This is understandable, but I asked "practically."
  9. sergo1914
    sergo1914 9 December 2017 15: 28
    10
    I agree with the Author.
  10. peta locksmith
    peta locksmith 9 December 2017 15: 40
    +9
    cit. Through Syria was supposed to stretch the pipeline from Qatar to Western Europe ....

    What, did anyone really think that in Syria "they really defend justice, the lawfully elected president of Assad"? and not someone's selfish interests?
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 9 December 2017 20: 42
      +1
      Well, in order to build something there, you need to calm down, all the warring parties there to clear the area - this is at least a few years, then you need to invest not a small amount of money and if you take all this in a compartment and add up, it turns out that the game is already obviously losing.
  11. 16112014nk
    16112014nk 9 December 2017 15: 42
    +6
    Quote: vlad007
    The intrigue .... in how many people will come to the polls.

    There is no turnout threshold. Even if one person comes (and he comes), the elections will be considered valid. But you still have to go. But since there are no “against all” columns, and I don’t want to give my vote to anyone, I have to ruin the ballot.
    1. Kudrevkn
      Kudrevkn 9 December 2017 15: 59
      +6
      I don’t go to the polls since the collapse of the USSR and "don’t read Soviet newspapers before dinner" (according to Bulgakov)?
      I feel great! And I’m absolutely confident in his position - Putin that the squirrel is in the wheel: it will stop and it will be carried forward from the Kremlin with the feet of its comrades! Like all predecessors before him !? The law of development of Russian (Soviet) society? However!?
      1. 16112014nk
        16112014nk 9 December 2017 16: 28
        +5
        Quote: KudrevKN
        I don’t go to the polls since the collapse of the USSR

        I understand you. He himself has no desire to cast any vote for anti-people power. But, if you don’t go to the polls, then this very power, without any remorse (which by definition it does not have), will simply attribute to its assets. And about the removal from the Kremlin .... well, until 2030 you can wait a bit. Although the lost time is very unfortunate.
        1. Sling cutter
          Sling cutter 9 December 2017 16: 33
          +8
          Quote: 16112014nk
          But, if you don’t go to the polls, then this very power, without any remorse (which it does not have by definition) will simply attribute to its assets.

          He will ascribe to that, but he will know the real legitimacy. They really need a turnout!
          By the way, each vote cast for the candidate is then paid to the candidate in the amount of 150 rubles
          1. 16112014nk
            16112014nk 9 December 2017 16: 42
            +5
            Quote: Stroporez
            paid to the candidate in the amount of 150 rubles

            So here is the thing. So our non-poor president still wants to get rich by more than 3 billion? Then he will probably give it to charity, so that they stop collecting money on the radio for operations for children.
  12. parusnik
    parusnik 9 December 2017 15: 53
    +4
    Again, some kind of faith in a good king, such as another king will come and become better .. He won’t ... From changing the terms of the terms, the amount does not change ... The original amount was received in 1991 .., and the final amount was established by universal suffrage the draft constitution of Russia, which took place on December 12, 1993. 58,43% voted for the adoption of the constitution, 41,57% voted against. Most liked it. I don’t, and the rest who voted against ... Moreover, this Constitution suits those who are in power and those who are eager for it .. In this they are united ..
  13. Nyrobsky
    Nyrobsky 9 December 2017 16: 02
    +3
    Article templates for shobla. Do not see real changes both in domestic and in foreign policy, in contrast to the 90s, when Russia's interests were handed over in bulk and retail, having lost all its more or less weighty friends and allies - it is necessary to try))). To assert that 70% of the Russian population somehow survives and at the same time gives 82-84% of the rating support for GDP indicates an attempt to pull their opinion on the Russian globe.
    1. vladimirvn
      vladimirvn 9 December 2017 16: 11
      22
      Successes in domestic and foreign policy look more or less good from the city of a million people, and not from the settlements of less than 100 thousand of the population, of which we have the majority.
      1. parusnik
        parusnik 9 December 2017 16: 19
        +6
        Successes in domestic and foreign policy look more or less good from the city of a million people, and not from the settlements of less than 100 thousand of the population, of which we have the majority.
        . good
      2. Nitochkin
        Nitochkin 9 December 2017 17: 02
        +8
        Right And if you look from any village, then in general the darkness is on the country.
      3. Nyrobsky
        Nyrobsky 9 December 2017 21: 39
        +3
        Quote: vladimirvn
        Successes in domestic and foreign policy look more or less good from the city of a million people, and not from the settlements of less than 100 thousand of the population, of which we have the majority.

        Well, so you will bother to remember who and in what period drove the company towns and settlements with a population of less than 100 thousand people into hopeless poverty destroying the city-forming enterprises. Is it not Boriska with the young reformers Chubais, Gaidar, Nemtsov, Khakamada, etc., when the miners protested on the "Brokeback Bridge", and Khakamada invited them to "go to the taiga and collect wild plants"? It was during their presence in power that the state farms and collective farms dispersed, depriving villages and villages of thousands of jobs, a well-functioning life and normal existence. Tens of thousands of villages and towns were deserted and closed. Today, the outback is an example of how the "democratic" reforms of the 90s affected the life of the people. So the prerequisites for a "sour" look from the outback were laid not 17 years ago, but a little earlier in 1991. It is clear that after the devastation that the pro-Western liberalists reformed, it was much more difficult to establish life in the outback than in large cities. Today, the same political resorts dream of revenge, return to power and complete the destruction of Russia relying on people like you. Only the people are unlikely to subscribe to a new experiment with the promise of "distributing buns" after the departure of GDP. Once already "ate" when they went for Boriska.
    2. creak
      creak 9 December 2017 17: 28
      +3
      Quote: Nyrobsky
      82-84% rating support for GDP indicates an attempt to pull their opinion on the Russian globe.

      At one time, for an indestructible bloc of Communists and non-partisan votes 99,9% voters.
      What happened then, many remember well ...
    3. Ulan
      Ulan 9 December 2017 20: 32
      +7
      We see real changes and that there could have been much more, for example, in the economy and, above all, in the economy.
      But fact is fact - oligarchs are getting richer, and the rest are getting poorer.
      This year, the wealth of the richest people in Russia in total increased by another 23 billion dollars.
      This is due to what, let me ask if the country's economy glides down smoothly.
      So far, smoothly. The conclusion is unequivocal. even Lomonosov said - if somewhere arrived, then somewhere disappeared.
      Decreased among the rest of the population, which has become poorer.
      Do not want to notice it? Your right, just do not try to hang the rest of the noodles on your ears, as someone Mr. Medvedev enthusiastically does.
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 9 December 2017 21: 11
        +2
        "This is due to what, let me ask if the country's economy glides down smoothly." But it no longer slides to the bottom, but grows smoothly.
      2. Nyrobsky
        Nyrobsky 9 December 2017 23: 16
        +1
        Quote: Ulan
        real changes and that there could be much more, for example, in the economy and, above all, in the economy.

        Ulan, and you did not forget the fact that our economy has long been poorly soldered for the reason that Russia, as the assignee of the USSR, paid the debt of all the breakaway republics? If we take into account the fact that in 1998 Russia was in a state of bankruptcy with a default, then the lion's share of debt repayment fell on the period from 2000 to the present. The last money we owed to the USSR was paid to the Croats only a couple of months ago. If Borka drank all the property of Russia and left a legacy of only 280 tons of gold, then since 2000 this figure has grown by almost 6 times and is about 1800 tons of yellow stainless steel. It turns out that not all oligarchs are tying. Our economy not only does not fall, but also grows to evil “partners” threatening to give GDP growth of 2% this year instead of the traditional growth of 1%. So I’ll end my comment with your question, which I am addressing to you
        Quote: Ulan
        Do not want to notice it? Your right, just do not try to hang the rest of the noodles on your ears,
        1. Nehist
          Nehist 10 December 2017 11: 27
          +3
          Wow!!! With the growth of the economy, the ability of the population also increases to pay! But here it is that same payment ability is steadily and not steadily falling. Isn't it a paradox? I understand that in Russia everything is not like everyone else but not to the same extent !!!
  14. chernig
    chernig 9 December 2017 16: 16
    0
    Begins, escalation, incitement and hatred before the election! How else do you endure the Earth freaks.
    1. Overlock
      Overlock 9 December 2017 17: 14
      +7
      Who are you talking about?
  15. unignm
    unignm 9 December 2017 16: 26
    +1
    In fact, in power for eighteen years.
    Further it is not interesting.
  16. vladimirvn
    vladimirvn 9 December 2017 16: 36
    +2
    You just have to watch the right movies. And everyone will be fine.
  17. Overlock
    Overlock 9 December 2017 16: 42
    +9
    Quote: СРЦ П-15
    On the contrary, at the command of Putin, they are racing to fulfill his "request" to help the country with finances

    Are you talking about capital flight? They fled to return the money to Russia.
    - The Russian government has finally abandoned the idea of ​​forcibly transferring oligarchic companies from offshore to their homeland
    The corresponding report on the complete surrender of the state to the moneybags was prepared by First Deputy Prime Minister Igor Shuvalov. The whole chip of the oligarchs was to get money here, and hide profits abroad. They did not want to lose such an opportunity. Moreover, by 2016, in the offshore, they managed to accumulate $ 1 trillion.
  18. Overlock
    Overlock 9 December 2017 16: 50
    +2
    Quote: Sovetskiy
    Shaw, now the "decision on the appointment" will be taken by the Central Committee of the EP? Plagiarized

    well no! usurpation of power!
  19. Overlock
    Overlock 9 December 2017 16: 52
    +4
    Quote: assa67
    to Bandera scum trampled our land

    What did you mean? About Ukraine or ISIS? If about Ukraine, then Bandera feel good in Ukraine and we do not exert influence on them.
  20. cedar
    cedar 9 December 2017 16: 55
    +4
    "... How to convey to our authorities what is really happening? How to make the authorities professing a golden calf turn to face people? Maybe it’s just that nobody should go to this election? And then at least something will change in the minds of our new boyars. "
    Author: Igor Sizov


    In fact, Sizov, Russia has been in political and economic occupation since 1991, but you do not see this point blank ...
    The authorities do not profess anything, it performs the role of the puppet government assigned to it by the invaders, but you do not see this point blank ...
    The occupation power never turned its face to people anywhere, it always robbed them, stole them and made them slaves, but you do not see this point blank ...
    Putin became the Leader of the National Liberation Movement of Russia, for this adversary is spread rot, but you do not see this point blank ...
    Blind people will not go to the polls, those who understand that we will choose not the president, but to be Russia and its people or not to be, but you do not see this point blank.
  21. Overlock
    Overlock 9 December 2017 17: 13
    +8
    Quote: Nyrobsky
    Do not see real changes both in internal

    "The poverty that exists and is fixed in the country is the poverty of the working population. This is a unique phenomenon in the social sphere - the working poor," Golodets said on Tuesday at the Social Forum as part of Russian Business Week 2017.

    According to her, in the Russian Federation "there is no such qualification that is worthy of a salary level of 7 thousand 500 rubles (minimum wage; approx. TASS)." "Even if a person graduated from high school, then after leaving his work should be assessed at a slightly different level. We will have serious discussions on raising the minimum wage," said the Deputy Prime Minister.

    “Last year, we ended the year with an average wage of 36 thousand 703 rubles, this is the average figure for the economy. But I draw attention to the fact that 4 million 900 thousand people work at the minimum wage level. What kind of labor productivity can we talk about if a person works for a month? so much money
    Quote: Nyrobsky
    To claim that 70% of Russia's population somehow survives


    -The number of poor in Russia in the first quarter increased by 2 million people, said the head of the Accounts Chamber Tatyana Golikova.

    “For the first quarter of 2017, the number of citizens who are below the poverty line is 15%, that is, 22 million. This is more than the annual figures of 2016 - 19,8 million people,” Golikova said during a meeting of the Federation Council on Wednesday
    - The Central Bank recorded an increase in overdue debts of Russians to banks. In January, bad debts of the “physicists” increased by 2,1%, while in the corporate sector the delay reached 12,1%. Money in the banking system will end this year, and defaults of private banks are coming.
    According to Fitch, the total amount owed to banks by banks last year was about 11 trillion rubles. And such debtors - about 40 million people, more than half of the economically active population of the country. Able to service its debts - about 8 million.
    Well, not 70%, but a lot: 40% + 22%
  22. andrej-shironov
    andrej-shironov 9 December 2017 17: 35
    +4
    Author, bravo! Everything is clear and to the point.
  23. IStreebok
    IStreebok 9 December 2017 17: 40
    0
    To put aside the gloom ... We are Russian))) and Death will put everything in its place.
  24. Lexus
    Lexus 9 December 2017 17: 51
    +7
    Forgive me, but the more appropriate name (what we have) is "golden n ... q".
  25. a.sirin
    a.sirin 9 December 2017 17: 52
    +3
    The question is simple; WHY there are no competitors
  26. frame5
    frame5 9 December 2017 18: 02
    +2
    Hmm, this is intrigue as an intrigue ...
  27. Radikal
    Radikal 9 December 2017 19: 19
    +2
    Quote: Chertt
    Quote: vladimirvn
    I know our pragmatic power, this is not an argument for it.

    And you know for sure, or the voices tell you that you know. Your malice is visible, no knowledge

    And you share your knowledge - we will understand! wassat
  28. 1536
    1536 9 December 2017 19: 32
    +2
    There is no constructive criticism. Some State Department in the pants.
    But the facts are there. In the capital of our country, power in many districts belongs to the "opposition". And what became better? Worse! Already rotten cabbage on the streets and in the subway brings that even though the saints take it out, the creation of a “ghetto” on the outskirts is being discussed. The mind is incomprehensible! And the merit in this is those who thoughtlessly vote against, ticking off crooks and crooks, or even just plain enemies with dual citizenship, who came to power not to rule, but to ruin the country. The situation as in the late 1980's - early 1990's. Only, thank God, loafers in the form of all kinds of "zablab" and offended diminished. It is hoped that we will withstand the onslaught of this pack of "deterrents" of Russia and our people. We have one homeland and one country. These who are eager for power have many homelands. Here they have a field of activity, work for which they pay a lot of money. And it is not yet known why we are moving forward so slowly, because politics is not right, or because this gang of "all-bad guys" is interfering.
    1. Anyone
      Anyone 10 December 2017 00: 03
      +4
      Some kind of stream of consciousness)) "Soviet loafers-zavlaby" are those who have done everything that today at least somehow works, flies, rides and shoots.
      Pearl about the "opposition" who seized power in the districts of Moscow you are in trouble telling those who do not live in Moscow.
      And it’s ridiculous to say that those who are eager for “many homelands” today are generally ridiculous, given that the children of officials of our ruling elite who have not left to live / study in which London / Partge can be counted on the fingers. Moreover, one hand is enough.
  29. trampoline instructor
    trampoline instructor 9 December 2017 19: 37
    0
    **** What will happen to steam heating? ―Are you kidding me, professor? ... The house was gone. Everything will be like clockwork. First, every evening, singing, then pipes will freeze in the toilets, then steam heating will burst, and so on. ****
    1. Conductor
      Conductor 10 December 2017 01: 36
      0
      To the point))) Very much to the point))
  30. tank64rus
    tank64rus 9 December 2017 19: 39
    0
    Nothing personal just business. Well, as for Syria, not all oligarchs are grabbing, part of it still falls to the people. Of course, to remove these from the feeder, but who will do it. So Syria is for a long time.
  31. Alsur
    Alsur 9 December 2017 19: 42
    0
    Quote: vladimirvn
    ..Why did we go to war in Syria? To protect Assad or preserve its territorial integrity? No matter how! It was supposed to stretch a pipeline through Syria from Qatar to Western Europe, and this is a colossal loss of our gas lobby. Why climbed into Ukraine? ..
    I still have not found a clear explanation for myself, why is the Crimean bridge being built? Maybe the event is also from this chain?


    Quote: Zibelew
    Quote: vladimirvn
    I still have not found a clear explanation for myself, why is the Crimean bridge being built?

    In Crimea, a couple of millions of Russians live and stand the Black Sea Fleet. The number of personnel of the Black Sea Fleet by the spring of 2014 was 25 people. Less than 000 thousand people left Ukraine from the 18 thousandth Crimean APU group to Ukraine, which also confirms the Russian character of the peninsula.


    Quote: vladimirvn
    Knowing our pragmatic power, this is not an argument for her. Here is money, very big money or geopolitics. And ultimately, money is all the same.


    Quote: Chertt
    Quote: vladimirvn
    I know our pragmatic power, this is not an argument for it.

    And you know for sure, or the voices tell you that you know. Your malice is visible, no knowledge


    I noticed that the two New, who were the first to leave comments, merged in ecstasy, condemning the power of Russia. I will not be surprised that this is the one person who wrote the article. even the construction of a gas pipeline that takes into account the economic interests of Russia is bad.
  32. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 9 December 2017 19: 50
    +2
    Our elite now does not know how to take their feet away from this very west ... They have already offered to invest in Russian OFZs denominated in foreign currency and at low interest laughing
    It was "sent by Putin" to a famous address. I believe that the "salvation" of capital in Russia will cost these "hit men" at decent interest ... Well, ina
  33. samarin1969
    samarin1969 9 December 2017 21: 06
    +4
    And according to the Constitution and in fact, Putin is a more media figure representing power. In order to really take the levers of power, he would have to destroy the bureaucratic kingdom of the “RF” and subjugate the elites. This requires severe measures, "guardsmen" and a massive layer of support from the people ... And this Putin can not do, or does not want.
    1. Svidetel 45
      Svidetel 45 10 December 2017 00: 00
      +2
      Yes, unfortunately, most likely both of them, and it would be time for the President to be not a kind, white and fluffy big liberal, but strict and fair, ready to show decisiveness, ready to stand up for the interests of the whole nation and country, like that as Colonel Kvachkov, but only more prudent and prudent. But, as the song goes, "... no one will give us liberation, neither the king, nor God and hero ...", but the people themselves are not very willing to change the situation, and maybe this is right, because there isn’t the very “guiding and guiding" that would inspire confidence, and everything that claims to have such a role just does not inspire such trust.
    2. cedar
      cedar 10 December 2017 06: 38
      +2
      samarin1969 "... For this we need severe measures," guardsmen "and a massive layer of support from the people ... And this is Putin to do can notor doesn't want to. "

      Can not. Crimea took, just because there would be massive support, if then the people would also support its reforms, now most likely they would live in another country, but ... the couple was not enough.
      Now reforms will not do, just this blind man does not see.
      When the mess begins, instincts begin to work. Some have fear for their own skin, others fear for their children and loved ones. FEAR will cause hitherto indifferent masses of people to become more active, and Martial Law (plus GDP) will direct this popular asset to the solution of urgent problems of the state, country, society.
  34. AndreyS
    AndreyS 9 December 2017 22: 03
    0
    How to convey to our government what is actually happening? How to make so that the power of professing the golden calf, turned to people? Maybe, just no one will go to these elections? And then at least something will change in the minds of our new boyars.
    Indeed, WELL HOW TO DO IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ???? Only there is no answer in this article. Thank you dear AUTHOR for reminding us that
    The country does not mind that V. V. Putin will go on to his next term in office. Because, unfortunately, there are no real competitors.
  35. mark_rod
    mark_rod 9 December 2017 22: 47
    +9
    In vain Putin went on another term .... Everything goes to the point that the attitude towards him will unfold 180 degrees and he will turn into New Yeltsin .... He won a rating in Russia on foreign policy. Now what? The impoverishment of the people can not be overcome by a shirt-guy from the beginning of the 2000s. You have to work right away ... but you don’t want to! I would like to sit in fitness centers, go fishing in Siberia, sink to the bottom of Lake Baikal ... etc. I have the feeling that Putin went on a trip around the world, and he was sent to people from a high bell tower! I can’t speak for myself, but, my friends - state employees barely live on the remnants of a feast from Miller and Naebulina ...
  36. Altona
    Altona 9 December 2017 23: 11
    0
    It seems that the author is reading my comments. I wrote the same thing recently.
  37. Overlock
    Overlock 10 December 2017 00: 30
    +1
    Quote: Vadim237
    But it no longer slides to the bottom, but grows smoothly.

    The growth of the Russian economy in 2017 will be 1,1%, in 2018 - 1,4%, the UN Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific predicts.
    Awesome growth! at the level of statistical error.
    Read more at RBC:
    https://www.rbc.ru/economics/01/05/2017/59073ac39
    a79476495fc9ba4
    1. Rico1977
      Rico1977 10 December 2017 14: 45
      0
      Found ekperdov. RBC is a foreign agent and is funded from the usa
    2. Vadim237
      Vadim237 10 December 2017 19: 11
      +1
      Rather, in 2018, growth will be 2%.
  38. Kent0001
    Kent0001 10 December 2017 01: 05
    +2
    The first normal article. Moreover, it is absolutely adequate. There is no reason to expect good.
  39. Conductor
    Conductor 10 December 2017 01: 34
    +1
    Someone doubted that Pu would not go to the polls?
    1. Overlock
      Overlock 10 December 2017 01: 50
      +2
      none. Everyone was sure of that. They didn’t take power to voluntarily renounce it
  40. Overlock
    Overlock 10 December 2017 02: 15
    +5
    Russian President Vladimir Putin has signed a federal law that allows individuals under foreign sanctions not to be recognized as tax residents of Russia.
    The bill was prepared by the head of the budget and finance committee of United Russia Andrei Makarov. It was adopted by the State Duma in third reading on March 23. 322 deputies voted “for”, 85 “against”, one parliamentarian abstained.
    Thus, the amendment applies to only a few entrepreneurs. Among them are Gennady Timchenko, Arkady Rotenberg, Nikolai Shamalov, Konstantin Malofeev, as well as TV presenter Dmitry Kiselev.
    Why should an ordinary ordinary citizen pay for a billionaire who has fallen under sanctions? After all, we will have to return to them from the budget the money that they paid as taxes for three years ...
    But haven't we all been sanctioned?
    The list of products has decreased, prices have risen, gasoline is getting more expensive, the dollar has strengthened, the ruble has fallen. We are all under sanctions, and preferences - to the elect.
    1. andrej-shironov
      andrej-shironov 10 December 2017 10: 32
      0
      Dear Overlock! Your questions are rhetorical smile Everyone understands everything perfectly, with the exception of those close to the pipe and body.
      1. Overlock
        Overlock 10 December 2017 12: 53
        +1
        I agree. But then, the practical question arises - for whom to vote and vote, are there any?
        1. andrej-shironov
          andrej-shironov 10 December 2017 14: 22
          +1
          I have already decided this question for myself. Since they all choose one we know whom, then I will not go to these elections. At least conscience will be clear.
  41. Romin
    Romin 10 December 2017 04: 05
    +8
    In fact, our country has a very bad political situation.
    And it’s obvious, take a look at the presidential candidates.
    Real goblins got out like Navalny and Sobchak.
    There were pensioners like Zhirinovsky and Zyuganov.
    And the reincarnation of the third term of V.V. Putin.
    Now let's think about why that is.
    And I will be grateful to everyone who expresses their thoughts on this matter ... the truth, it is somewhere nearby
    I think that we are in a political crisis, at the bottom of the political development of society ... only revolution can knock from below, and this is a collapse.
    The system that operates in our country has led to the fact that we do not see a single, not exactly two full-fledged candidates or receivers from V.V. Putin.
    The development systems of the country's leaders were deliberately destroyed by someone. And this is a very, very disturbing situation.
    Let me remind you, even to communist China, the system of rotation of the power nomenclature and especially, especially the training of personnel and receivers, has been adopted.
    The same system operates in the "West", there they practice targeted mentoring and training of receivers and replacements. (The same systems are adopted in the business building of Western companies, if the manager quit, increases or becomes ill, then there are always 2 receivers — this is the standard).

    What do we have in this plan, but nothing! The complete lack of choice! Around VV Putin scorched earth. On the horizon are goblins, retirees and a handful of self-identified people.
    Emphasize Blasted Earth!
    It’s a very big difference to manage the collective farm Lenin Road and the country, to be the leader of the party and to rule the country!
    Vladimir Putin has not presented a single receiver for all the years of his presidency! Stop - and Medvedev (here, in my opinion, a separate branch can work out).
    But today - de facto not a single receiver and scorched earth around!
    What is bad about such a system or form of government, I hope, no need to explain. These are huge risks for the country! We have already passed both the 17th and 91st. These rakes are obvious and well-known, but VV Putin ignores them.
    You tell me, it's not my mind, etc. , And I do not agree with you, if you want a king or secretary general, or maybe immediately to serfs with a serfdom, then I’m not on your way and you don’t have to drag my country there!
    What I saw in the media from political strategists of Vladimir Putin in the project "I am going to the presidency" really surprised me, discouraged and upset. I was surprised by the format, discouraged by insecurity, and surprised by the clowning-post-presentation for the mentally limited, by which people, Russia, as I consider it is not. We gathered volunteers, then a factory, handed out texts and go! Who is this for? Are political strategists stuck in the 90s? How, at this moment, did I sharply feel the abyss in the perception of reality in the eyes of the authorities and many citizens with whom I managed to communicate during this time - one opinion is that we are kept for idiots? Komsomol members are volunteers ...! Here, of those with whom I spoke, no one positively and not without a grin in such a format for a decision to run for election.
    And this served as another proof for me that the people and the authorities have long lived in different "universes." And the fact that many are trying to somehow guess, justify, invent why and ascribe the most cunning plans to the actions of V.V. Putin’s are nothing more than fear ... It’s precisely the fear, from an intuitive understanding of the gap between the worlds and concerns, the desire to find in these actions of the president and the team grains of factors that directly or indirectly positively affect their fate, life. Fools (excuse me), they have not thought about you for a long time, they have their own "universe."
    And from the understanding of these processes, as I see it, the situation of stagnation and lack of Choice has developed. With a sufficiently large number of educated and intelligent people, no one, even if desired, can stand on a par with candidate V.V. Putin and compete with him on equal terms! In our country, everything has been created so that there is no competition in this area.
    For example, what can make all candidates equal?
    The answer is obvious and, as they say, invented before us.
    Debate!
    Yes, direct debate on presidential candidates.
    It is this platform that creates the opportunity to take off the “crown” and communicate on equal terms to everyone, and on the other to show the candidate’s entire experience and knowledge! It is dialogue and communication that creates a competitive advantage for all of us! And this is nature.
    I do not see a single danger for VV Putin's participation in the debate.
    Moreover, I will say a sacred phrase: Stop making the “Tsar” from the president and not touch! This contradicts the evolution of the political system and throws us into oligarchism.
    I think we need to debate here.
    Then the second, global question.
    The president does not rule the country alone, the president rules the country on the basis of the constitution and law of the Russian Federation.
    I'd love to take a look or hear a list of people from the team of Vladimir Putin.
    You tell me why? The choice is already uncontested.
    And I will answer, without competition we get what we have. And many here will punch in the chest, that V.V. Putin is good, but Medvedev, he has appointed himself and the ruler of the government is independent and does not listen to the president. It’s ridiculous to read you, my dears, with such comments.
    So "itchy hands" still have a lot to write, but I invite you, please, to debate on this subject.
  42. cedar
    cedar 10 December 2017 06: 56
    +1
    Quote: Romin
    So "itchy hands" still have a lot to write, but I invite you, please, to debate on this subject.


    Nobody in this world has yet obeyed words, unless authority was based on them, based on the power of ... words. And the power of a word is such a power when no power is any longer a power. This is the power - this power of the word ...

    1. Overlock
      Overlock 10 December 2017 08: 49
      0
      logically, do you want to bomb the territory of the Russian Federation? to solve the problems of our country do you prefer high-explosive bombs?
    2. vasya.pupkin
      vasya.pupkin 10 December 2017 12: 53
      +1
      Oh, I'm afraid in six months / when V.V.P. will conduct the World Cup /, these piglets will sprinkle on the heads of the pan-legcoles. And dugouts in 3-5 coasts will not help them.
  43. kriten
    kriten 10 December 2017 12: 43
    +1
    You won’t do anything. Putin and put in power a golden calf, and he faithfully serves him. And poverty provides the people for many years, flattering it with a demagogy of stability.
    1. AUL
      AUL 10 December 2017 21: 38
      0
      Therefore, I am amused by the assertions of some political strategists present here that, like, “he would be glad, his hands are tied, he lacks power, he created the Rosguard against the oligarchs” and so on and so forth ...
  44. Rico1977
    Rico1977 10 December 2017 14: 44
    +3
    Bullshit and not an article. Putin went to the polls for only one reason - there is no one to hand over power so far. And the money in the head of the author of the article judges by itself. Putin for the state is insulting. He can afford any move, but he is guided by only one thing - the interests of Russia. There is nothing more for him. And everything that he does, he does so that Russia develops evolutionarily, without shocks, without blood. So that such narrow-minded throats as the author, as well as his opponents, do not clutch each other's throats and blood does not spill. Because any fight inside the country will be the end of Russia. They’ll finish us right away. And if someone does not understand this, then he is DB. Putin is as simple as 5 cents. The development of the country without shocks, without blood. Yes, you can like Stalin drive the opposition, or such as the author in prison and shoot. And it will be quiet. But he d .. says - let's live together with .. so finally. Enough of each other to destroy the Russian. You live peacefully at last, work for the good of our common country. And thank God that the people understand this. And such as the author, the gorlopans scream all of Stalin on you. Yes, you, the first screamers who were bad under Stalin, would have been shot as critics of the authorities and the party’s solely loyal line, no matter what they did. Putin must be supported and trusted. In the entire history of Russia, this is the best ruler of our long-suffering country.
  45. The comment was deleted.
  46. Normal ok
    Normal ok 10 December 2017 17: 31
    0
    This was probably a difficult decision. In fact, having been in power for eighteen years, it is time to think about changing the scope of their activities. Yes, not so simple.

    Of course, "not just like that", but on the advice of PiAr technologists.
  47. AUL
    AUL 10 December 2017 21: 33
    0
    Quote: Romin
    For example, what can make all candidates equal?
    The answer is obvious and, as they say, invented before us.
    Debate!
    Yes, direct debate on presidential candidates.

    I do not agree! Pre-election rhetoric is who promises more. And in the future - we see what happens. But asking for the promised is not possible.
    For the rest, I agree with you - the clearing is cleared so carefully that it’s difficult for a really worthy applicant to light up.
  48. Spook
    Spook 11 December 2017 11: 23
    0
    Of course, Putin does not take away what he has done for the country, and no one detracts from his successes. Russia really returned to the club of leading powers. But all this is not for the country, as such, and not for you and me, the common people. Everything is done for the prosperity and self-satisfaction of our ruling elite.


    This is always the case and it is the fundamental basis for any existence of the state, it does not exist otherwise. If you want to challenge this, then discussing with you is stupid.
    1. Stin u
      Stin u 12 December 2017 04: 37
      0
      The one quoted in four lines has one contradiction, where did he find success with Putin? And what did he do with the Country? Since 1999. A kind of boy with a pipe ... leads us into the swamp. Jesus correctly said - judge according to deeds. Putin is a wolf in sheep's clothing. This is what kind of talent it is necessary to possess that we are already buying sewing needles in China. Putin and Medvedev need to repent on Red Square, while crowded and kneeling. 20 years of degradation and collapse. Manages to do it. Chekist - in a word.
  49. Stin u
    Stin u 12 December 2017 04: 21
    0
    "The country does not mind that V.V. Putin goes to his next presidential term. Because, unfortunately, there are no real competitors."

    Well ... So he started so well and how he finished ... In my opinion, Putin would have been good at the post of Minister of Foreign Affairs. Perhaps there he would have shown himself at 100%. For Russia, in domestic politics and economics, it is rather weak, to put it mildly, or, more precisely, NO. He and Medvedev seem to be at the helm since 1999, and what is the result?
    They say-Putin lifted Russia from its knees ... so what? In order to make her cancer? So it is rape "mother" and strangers and their own, which is more offensive. And what to the people - relax and have fun? 20 million beggars - SHAME! Does not pull "TANDEM" in the Russian open spaces, does not pull. Putin as “Figaro” - both here and there. And no where.
    By his own admission - "... like a slave in the galleys ..." I understand that the crap. And there’s no one to row in Russia already. Maybe it would be better if he stood at the helm, plotting the course. Or are these "posts" occupied by someone? For all the years that he rowed on oars as a slave, Russian citizens did not see either a goal or a course. I’m watching on TV - it looks good for a slave.
    And yet it’s interesting - who is at the helm?
    1. Combitor
      Combitor 12 December 2017 05: 46
      0
      Stin U, << They say - Putin raised Russia from its knees ... well? To put her cancer? >>
      I agree with you. In order to be in the "cancer" position, it is not necessary to touch the ground with your knees.
  50. Combitor
    Combitor 12 December 2017 05: 43
    0
    All according to the worked out scenario ...