Military Review
Sign in Sign up

The timing of exit from the repair of the BPC "Admiral Chabanenko" once again moved

28
The timing of exit from the repair of a large anti-submarine ship (BOD) "Admiral Chabanenko" Northern fleet once again they will be reviewed, and not through the fault of shipbuilders, an industry source said Wednesday.


Due to the lack of funding, the entire scope of modernization works that need to be carried out on a ship has not yet been determined.
- He said.

The timing of exit from the repair of the BPC "Admiral Chabanenko" once again moved


BOD "Admiral Chabanenko" - the only representative of the ships of the 1155.1 project in the Russian Navy - got up for repair and modernization at the 35 ship repair plant - a branch of the Zvezdochka Ship Repair Center (part of the United Shipbuilding Corporation) in 2014. At first it was assumed that he would restore technical readiness in the 2016 year, then in the 2017 year.

Even the adjusted plan will not be executed. Due to the lack of funds, it is now impossible even to say roughly when the BOD will leave the 35 CPH.
- Said the source agency.

Earlier it was reported that as of the end of 2015, there was an agreement between industry and the military to increase funding for the entire planned scope of work, but, apparently, it was not implemented, reports Interfax-AVN
Photos used:
shipspotting.com
Military Reviewin Yandex News
Military Reviewin Google News
28 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. 117 factory
    117 factory 6 December 2017 14: 02
    +7
    Well ... It’s not that we can’t build a new one on time, but we cannot repair the old one .. Not the factory workers are to blame, of course, again there is no money.
    1. Grandfather
      Grandfather 6 December 2017 14: 07
      +1
      Quote: Factory 117
      The timing of exit from the repair of the BPC "Admiral Chabanenko" once again moved

      The timing of exit from the repair of the BPC "Admiral Chabanenko" once again moved this "surprise ..." before that, was it not so? the norm ... the identification of "sores" should be so and should be surrendered ... only "unfinished" annoying ... I kind of plow the spirit of the work, and the ship is all one "aground" though I am in the Urals ...
      1. Krabik
        Krabik 7 December 2017 22: 22
        0
        Probably at the pipe plant you make pipes for pumping hydrocarbons to competitors ?!

        Well, as if the result ...
    2. Burbon
      Burbon 6 December 2017 14: 10
      11
      Quote: Factory 117
      Not the factory workers are to blame for this, of course, again there is no money.

      and why there is no money ?? ... cheers-patriots are sure that sanctions are in the brain, in fact they are ridiculous - this is the result .. NPS, Barguzin, now Shepherd and Nakhimov are not known when .... but only in February there will be new, very sensitive sanctions .....
      1. bddrus
        bddrus 6 December 2017 14: 34
        +1
        and you, a true patriot, why are you happy?
        1. Burbon
          Burbon 6 December 2017 14: 53
          +5
          Quote: bddrus
          and you

          do not poke .....
          Quote: bddrus
          real patriot

          Yes
          Quote: bddrus
          why are you happy?

          ? fool fool fool where and when?
          1. bddrus
            bddrus 10 December 2017 08: 22
            0
            then do not poke.
            funny self-appointed "real patriots" love to brand "cheers-patriots" so much
    3. Piramidon
      Piramidon 6 December 2017 15: 00
      +2
      Quote: Plant 117
      Well ... It’s not that we can’t build a new one on time, but we cannot repair the old one .. Not the factory workers are to blame, of course, again there is no money.

      But there are a lot of cheers-patriots who shout: "Give Russian aircraft carriers !!!", "Do you need this trifle in the form of RTOs?" And they do not care that at one time the USSR was seduced by fake by SDI and tried to catch up with the amers.
      1. Krabik
        Krabik 7 December 2017 22: 24
        0
        How did he behave and what did he make of what the Pentagon offered under the SDI program?
        1. Piramidon
          Piramidon 7 December 2017 23: 05
          0
          Well, at least the development of the Taran missile defense system, which our industry did not pull and the project was closed.
          1. Krabik
            Krabik 8 December 2017 02: 48
            0
            The first links on Yandex say that "Taran" is not associated with SDI, are you sure about the topic?
    4. RASKAT
      RASKAT 6 December 2017 16: 14
      +3
      So right, who is there at the 35th SRH for a salary of 20 tr will work? In the Far East, we are in general trouble with personnel in Shipbuilding and repair.
      1. donavi49
        donavi49 6 December 2017 16: 25
        0
        This is the North. In the Far East, by the way, money was allocated for Shaposhnikov.
      2. Piramidon
        Piramidon 8 December 2017 14: 46
        0
        Quote: RASKAT
        who is there at the 35th shipyard for a salary of 20 tr will work?

        Like who? Retired MO. I, after being transferred to the reserve, worked in the TEC of my native division for another 6 years as an employee of the RA.
  2. Romario_Argo
    Romario_Argo 6 December 2017 14: 03
    +4
    suppliers simply do not keep up with government orders, so the breakdowns go
    + changes are constantly being made, types of work are increasing, and yes, the estimate is increasing
    but, no matter how, due to lack of funds, we just have to admit that there will be a deeper modernization than planned
    1. The comment was deleted.
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. Gardamir
    Gardamir 6 December 2017 14: 15
    +2
    and not through the fault of shipbuilders
    the cat left the kittens, but no one was to blame.
  5. senima56
    senima56 6 December 2017 14: 21
    0
    Vorie! The thieves!
    1. bddrus
      bddrus 6 December 2017 14: 34
      +1
      Lyoshenka in condoms! Uryaaaa!
      1. Greenwood
        Greenwood 7 December 2017 05: 44
        0
        Specify which ... This:

        Or this:

        ?? request
        1. Krabik
          Krabik 7 December 2017 22: 28
          0
          Maybe it’s worth Peter Alekseevich ?!
          He proved himself to be very worthy in business:
        2. bddrus
          bddrus 10 December 2017 08: 23
          0
          Bliiin, one is better than the other, I don’t even know - maybe they will create a couple
  6. Sergey53
    Sergey53 6 December 2017 15: 25
    0
    It turns out that since 2014 they did not even begin to repair it. And what have they just announced? What was eaten silently, nothing more?
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 6 December 2017 16: 27
      +2
      There, with the resource of turbines (or rather, with measures to restore the resource), there are some problems.
      Since 2014 years, dismantling and fault detection have been carried out. From 16 onwards, financing and turbine solutions await. If you make turbines according to that option, then it takes 5 years to be limited (or rather 3 of the year - VTG and 2 of the year after VTG) and that's all.
  7. Nemesis
    Nemesis 6 December 2017 18: 57
    0
    And all because Chubais are eating Russia ...
  8. exo
    exo 6 December 2017 21: 10
    0
    These are old ships. And every day in anticipation of repairs at the wall of the repair plant (although it is proudly called modernization), it only leads to more obsolescence.
    And this is a huge problem.
    1. Igor V
      Igor V 6 December 2017 21: 35
      +2
      Not so old. At the beginning of the 90s, Yantar stood completely ready with the crew of the Northern Fleet at the PSZ wall for several years. There was no money for testing! So the Admiral is unlucky. But if then there was such a government policy, now what? Of course, I am not a taxi driver and I can not give advice to economists, but even Eugene Onegin "... knew how to judge how rich the state is and how it lives and why it does not need gold when it has a simple product." And our economists cannot give out a state loan for gold or for gold. And sanctions have nothing to do with it. Our country has always lived under sanctions and this has never been the reason.
      1. exo
        exo 8 December 2017 18: 40
        0
        Still: the newest, by Russian standards, is not quite the same thing as the newest by the standards of the world's leading naval powers. Unfortunately.
    2. Greenwood
      Greenwood 7 December 2017 05: 48
      +2
      This is essentially the newest. Commissioning in 1999. But in fact, this is a Soviet backlog, as well as Peter the Great (commissioned in 1998).