Military Review

In Kamchatka, deployed the second division of the coastal complex "Bastion"

38
In the near future, a separate coastal missile and artillery brigade stationed in Kamchatka will receive the second division of the Bastion complex, reports Interfax Post commander of the troops and forces in the north-east of Russia, Rear Admiral Sergei Lipilin.




The coastal missile system “Bastion” has come to replace the outdated and out-of-date Rubezh and Redut complexes. At the moment, the second such division has been formed and is being trained,
Lipilin said in an interview with the newspaper "Red Star".

Moreover, according to the plans, in the next few years we should receive several more battalions, “Bastion” and “Ball”. Every year one by one
added the admiral.

The agency recalls that 15 November 2016, the complex "Bastion", deployed in Syria, was first used for ground targets - the objects of the "Islamic State" (IG, grouping is prohibited in the Russian Federation). It was announced that the shooting was carried out at a distance of 450 km.

Photos used:
www.youtube.com / RT
38 comments
Ad

Our projects are looking for authors in the news and analytical departments. Requirements for applicants: literacy, responsibility, efficiency, inexhaustible creative energy, experience in copywriting or journalism, the ability to quickly analyze text and check facts, write concisely and interestingly on political and economic topics. The work is paid. Contact: [email protected]

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Sofa General
    Sofa General 5 December 2017 15: 49 New
    +4
    That's all, the Japanese are ready to write the next "notes" and "protests"
    1. Nasrat
      Nasrat 5 December 2017 15: 56 New
      +3
      Kamchatka has nothing to do with Japan ... why should they write protests?
      1. Topotun
        Topotun 5 December 2017 17: 04 New
        +2
        And we will be indignant at the violation of the peace-loving policies of NATO and Japan towards Russia.
      2. Firstvanguard
        Firstvanguard 6 December 2017 04: 03 New
        +1
        Quote: Nasr
        Kamchatka has nothing to do with Japan ... why should they write protests?

        The Kuril Islands also do not belong, however ...
    2. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 5 December 2017 16: 23 New
      +3
      Video to the news
    3. Burbon
      Burbon 5 December 2017 17: 59 New
      +1
      Quote: Sofa General
      That's all, the Japanese are ready to write the next "notes" and "protests"

      while only you do this
  2. 210ox
    210ox 5 December 2017 15: 53 New
    +2
    And I have another question .. Are two divisions enough to cover the peninsula and not only it?
    1. Nasrat
      Nasrat 5 December 2017 15: 58 New
      +3
      And no one covers the peninsula ... They cover Vilyuchinsk ...
      1. bk316
        bk316 5 December 2017 16: 31 New
        +4
        Absolutely. There, except for Vilyuchinsk and its environs, except perhaps to cover the bears.
        1. hrych
          hrych 5 December 2017 16: 55 New
          +1
          Quote: bk316
          only bears to cover the surroundings

          Here, rather, the Japanese should be covered from bears wassat
        2. Alexey RA
          Alexey RA 5 December 2017 18: 46 New
          +5
          Bgggg ... I remembered the old Hochma about the conditional enemy’s landing on exercises:
          The admiral froze in a monumental pose, eagle stomping his fingers on top of the map: - Sooooo ... Well then. Let's get started. At five zero, the conditional opponent, *****, committed a deliberate act of aggression, crossing the border ***** of our state ...- the admiral pulled back a little and made two strokes with his index finger, - ... and here. By the forces of two combined arms armies with the support of aviation and, accordingly, their fleet. Here, uh ... No, here the enemy landed a tactical assault force to the battalion. Chief of Staff, your actions to eliminate the landing?
          NSh, mossy as a ***** mammoth cap-two, who knew for sure that it would never be a capra in this life, majestically broke away from tapping the table with a pencil. I looked at the place where the boss’s finger was drawing the map. Then he closed his eyes. And so froze.
          Silence fell in the room, as the NS continued to remain silent, inexorably galvanizing the spread of the crimson color across the admiral's face.
          - Chief of staff! Captain of the second rank Amelko! .. Bother to explain your actions!
          NS opened his eyes and smiled at the admiral as the grandfather smiles at the mischievous, but beloved grandchildren. Those. - tortured.
          “I will sleep, Comrade Admiral.”
          - WHAT?!..
          “Comrade Admiral, the point you showed is the island.” Naked stone baldness a mile from the mainland. In the strait between the island and the mainland there are rocks, a strong current and a wave two meters high. If the enemy is such an idiot that he lands on the island, then these kamikazes without outside help will leave from there only in one direction - to the cemetery. That is why I will sleep peacefully ... - finished NS. He thought for three seconds and specified: - ... On guard of the beloved Motherland.
          “Uhhh ...” the admiral was embarrassed. In thought, rubbed his nose. - Well, well ... By bold and decisive actions, the enemy’s landing force, ***** him, is destroyed! So, what is next for the training plan? ..
          © u-96
  3. NEXUS
    NEXUS 5 December 2017 15: 55 New
    +4
    Bastions and Balls in Kamchatka need not one or even two units. And the statement that ..
    Moreover, according to plans, in the next few years we should get several more Bastion and Ball divisions. One each year,

    Very strange, given what is happening at our borders and in the waters of our seas.
    1. shans2
      shans2 5 December 2017 15: 57 New
      +4
      "divisions", why this stupid post of yours?
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
        2. marlin1203
          marlin1203 5 December 2017 16: 07 New
          +5
          There is nothing to snitch on the “whole Kamchatka”, there are a couple of important objects, they will be covered.
          1. NEXUS
            NEXUS 5 December 2017 16: 12 New
            +3
            Quote: marlin1203
            There is nothing to snitch on the “whole Kamchatka”, there are a couple of important objects, they will be covered.

            And then we are surprised and indignant at why the NATO destroyers are roaming around our borders, like at home ...
            1. Muvka
              Muvka 5 December 2017 16: 17 New
              0
              Is it forbidden to walk along borders? Or if there are more bastions there, will they stop walking?
              1. NEXUS
                NEXUS 5 December 2017 16: 21 New
                +3
                Quote: Muvka
                Is it forbidden to walk along borders? Or if there are more bastions there, will they stop walking?

                What do you think? To go at gunpoint, while being irradiated by coastal electronic warfare systems, or at home, I walked around, “copied” with what radars where I’m based and just as calmly left, what’s better for the NATO destroyer?
                1. Muvka
                  Muvka 5 December 2017 16: 22 New
                  0
                  They will walk anyway. Put at least 10 divisions, at least 100. Why should they stop walking in neutral waters?
                  1. NEXUS
                    NEXUS 5 December 2017 16: 24 New
                    +3
                    Quote: Muvka
                    They will walk anyway. Put at least 10 divisions, at least 100. Why should they stop walking in neutral waters?

                    Excuse me, but the destroyer Cook was also in neutral waters in the World Cup when this whole story happened to him?
                    1. bk316
                      bk316 5 December 2017 16: 36 New
                      +3
                      According to your logic, half a hundred divisions should be deployed along the coast of the Arctic North. Even under the USSR, there was nothing there in Kamchatka.
                      1. NEXUS
                        NEXUS 5 December 2017 17: 37 New
                        +3
                        Quote: bk316
                        According to your logic, half a hundred divisions should be deployed along the coast of the Arctic North. Even under the USSR, there was nothing there in Kamchatka.

                        Not half a hundred, but at least a dozen ... and not you, I can’t know where there will be another pressure in a year. Now, this is the western direction, and tomorrow?
                        Do not exaggerate and distort the meaning of my words.
                      2. frols
                        frols 5 December 2017 18: 00 New
                        +1
                        As it was not, I served in military unit 19932 E. tongue
                    2. Rokossovsky
                      Rokossovsky 5 December 2017 16: 50 New
                      +6
                      Quote: NEXUS

                      Excuse me, but the destroyer Cook was also in neutral waters in the World Cup when this whole story happened to him?

                      What is the story? About Khibiny and diapers? Throw it, Nexus, do not disgrace! hi
                      1. NEXUS
                        NEXUS 5 December 2017 17: 17 New
                        +2
                        Quote: Rokossovsky
                        What is the story? About Khibiny and diapers? Throw it, Nexus, do not disgrace!

                        And here Khibiny, dear? On Su-24 there is no Khibin from the word at all. fool
                    3. hrych
                      hrych 5 December 2017 17: 20 New
                      +3
                      Quote: NEXUS
                      Very strange, given what is happening at our borders and in the waters of our seas.

                      So in the division of 16 Onyx laughing Those. the second division gives 32 missiles, this is a fleet of large vessels that can be sent to feed crabs laughing They do not say anything about the special warhead, but the predecessor Granite carried a half-megaton charge, given that this one carries 250 kg, then the 300-kiloton charge is native to it in terms of mass and dimensions. A pair of divisions plus the Ball, plus the coastal aviation, RTOs, etc. There are deployed ZGRLS Sunflower. The bastion paired with the Sunflower is a terrible force, well, a little ball good
                      Quote: NEXUS
                      , walked, "sketched" with radars of which where based

                      Bastion and Ball are mobile; they change their location to max.
                      1. Waterfowl
                        Waterfowl 5 December 2017 19: 01 New
                        +1
                        In Kamchatka, in the summer, the problem is to change the location, and in winter it is useless.
                2. Alexey RA
                  Alexey RA 5 December 2017 17: 13 New
                  +2
                  Quote: NEXUS
                  What do you think? To go at gunpoint, while being irradiated by coastal electronic warfare systems, or at home, I walked around, “copied” with what radars where I’m based and just as calmly left, what’s better for the NATO destroyer?

                  No difference. In 1988, Yorktown and Caron had to be pushed out in bulk from the territorial waters of the USSR - despite the "hundredth" and other BOs. And then the Yankees did not understand the first time - it came only after the "Bezavezavetny" deployed the RBU-6000 PU on them, and the Mi-24 appeared in the air.

                  However, it’s the first case that is better for EM NATO - for then it will be able to carry out a combat mission by “taking a picture” of the enemy’s radio-emitting means. In our air defense, this was called an “injection” - when a high-speed aircraft with good BKO at full speed enters the airspace and turns around and leaves after a short period of time. At this time, his RTR airborne vehicles and RTR airplanes at the border write signals and direction-finding sources of radiation raised by the air defense alarm.
                  1. NEXUS
                    NEXUS 5 December 2017 17: 33 New
                    +2
                    Quote: Alexey RA
                    However, it’s the first case that is better for EM NATO - for then it will be able to carry out a combat mission by “taking a picture” of the enemy’s radio-emitting means. In our air defense, this was called an “injection” - when a high-speed aircraft with good BKO at full speed enters the airspace and turns around and leaves after a short period of time. At this time, his RTR airborne vehicles and RTR airplanes at the border write signals and direction-finding sources of radiation raised by the air defense alarm.

                    Here I am talking about ... that is, in addition to the Bastions and Balls, it is necessary to put coastal EW complexes there, and not one or two. I know about NAVAL.
                    For me, one division a year is not enough. At the same time, yes, in conjunction with the Sunflower, this entire defensive line will be effective and reliable.
        3. dr.star75
          dr.star75 5 December 2017 16: 08 New
          0
          Very simple: there is no money - 1, and 2 - there are no capacities for production.
          1. bk316
            bk316 5 December 2017 16: 32 New
            +4
            there is no money - 1, and 2 - there is no capacity for production.

            There is no answer like this: there are no fools to deploy units in the middle of the tundra away from any civilization.
            1. dr.star75
              dr.star75 5 December 2017 16: 48 New
              0
              More supply routes need to be covered. Your avatar is original
              1. bk316
                bk316 8 December 2017 09: 37 New
                +2
                On the avatar is my knee.
                You can’t cover the ways of supplying the coastal complexes, then you need to build airfields and a surface fleet. There was not enough money for this even under the USSR.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Dart2027
      Dart2027 5 December 2017 19: 38 New
      0
      Quote: NEXUS
      Bastions and Balls in Kamchatka need not one or even two units

      Well, after all, they are not only put there.
  4. Rokossovsky
    Rokossovsky 5 December 2017 17: 23 New
    +2
    Quote: NEXUS
    And here Khibiny, dear? On Su-24 there is no Khibin from the word at all. fool

    So enlighten me, what happened to poor Cook there?
    1. Siberia55
      Siberia55 5 December 2017 17: 59 New
      0
      And when our Commander-in-Chief gave the order to deploy the "Bastions" and point it at the "cookie". Exceptional for irradiation, they tasted that they were accompanied and choked quickly in the direction to the side. If I am not mistaken.
      1. Fedya2017
        Fedya2017 5 December 2017 20: 13 New
        +1
        Quote: Siberia55
        Exceptional for irradiation, they tasted that they were accompanied and choked quickly in the direction to the side. If I am not mistaken.

        Did it ever occur to you that “Cook” needed this? To record a "picture" of the radar, for example.
  5. Old26
    Old26 5 December 2017 17: 53 New
    +1
    Quote: 210ox
    And I have another question .. Are two divisions enough to cover the peninsula and not only it?

    No. If you believe the open information, the division is able to cover 600 km along the front. But the coastline of Kamchatka is unlikely to cover 600 km of the coastline. But even if you accept this figure - at least 3 divisions on the east coast of Kamchatka
    1. NEXUS
      NEXUS 5 December 2017 20: 59 New
      +2
      Quote: Old26
      No. If you believe the open information, the division is able to cover 600 km along the front. But the coastline of Kamchatka is unlikely to cover 600 km of the coastline. But even if you accept this figure - at least 3 divisions on the east coast of Kamchatka

      But I’m not talking about the same thing, but I’m thinking not of 3 divisions, but of at least 5.
  6. Nemesis
    Nemesis 5 December 2017 21: 15 New
    0
    This is not bad, but such anti-ship missiles and S-400 air defense systems are needed on Shikotan so that NATO bases in Japan do not relax and Japan does not sharpen its teeth in Russia ...