Military Review

The cruiser "Admiral Kuznetsov" will begin to repair in 2018

41
The cruiser "Admiral Kuznetsov" will begin to be repaired next year, the amount of repair work will depend on the balance of the state armament program. Today, the head of USC, Alexey Rakhmanov, told this to journalists.


Will definitely start in 2018 year. Volumes will depend on the balance of the state armament program. Question to the military
- declared Rakhmanov

The cruiser "Admiral Kuznetsov" will begin to repair in 2018


Former commander of the North fleet Nikolay Evmenov said that "Admiral Kuznetsov" was sent for repairs.

Everything goes according to plans, no transfers are allowed.
- stressed the commander of the Federation Council.

According to him, the participation of the aircraft carrier in long-distance campaigns in the near future is not planned.

In June, Deputy Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Navy, Viktor Bursuk, announced that the repair and modernization of Admiral Kuznetsov would begin in 2018.

In the United Shipbuilding Corporation reported that they are ready to take the cruiser for repairs in the current year. It is planned that the modernization of the cruiser will end at the end of 2020 of the year.
Photos used:
http://coolrobo.ru/
41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Dangerous
    Dangerous 5 December 2017 15: 28
    +3
    Do we need him? Use it in conflicts like Syriac? Well, we have an air base there. And there are hardly any other tasks for him. Well, yes, the generals and admirals know better
    1. siberalt
      siberalt 5 December 2017 15: 36
      +2
      Put a smoke trap on Kuzya, and make a small soot factory there. And there will be self-sufficiency! lol
      1. Winnie76
        Winnie76 5 December 2017 17: 49
        0
        Quote: siberalt
        Put a smoke trap on Kuzya, and make a small soot factory there. And there will be self-sufficiency!

        I would do a museum. Or a casino. And he overtook Crimea, while Erdenysh is still friends.
    2. Foamas
      Foamas 5 December 2017 15: 44
      +2
      Needed until a new one is done.
      And even so, the great competencies in deck aviation will be lost.
    3. Nasrat
      Nasrat 5 December 2017 15: 47
      +1
      Quote: Dangerous
      Do we need him? Use it in conflicts like Syriac? Well, we have an air base there. And there are hardly any other tasks for him. Well, yes, the generals and admirals know better

      Sell ​​to China .... he bakes them like pies .. wassat
      1. hrych
        hrych 5 December 2017 17: 48
        +2
        Quote: Nasr
        Sell ​​to China .... he bakes them like pies ..

        He built so far alone and then let it down into the water. He completed our Varangian-Liaoning, having driven with tugboats to China, and the Varangian did not give up laughing The Turks did not allow the passage of the Bosphorus for a long time, fell into a storm in the Mediterranean Sea, broke the cable, drifted, the crew took off helicopters, and the sailor was killed while trying to overtake. Suez did not give the good, I had to go around Africa. The hull and frames corroded and deformed, there the Chinese cooked something, cooked, so the cruiser is in an incomprehensible state while it seems to be floating. While the tests are underway and while the Chinese are studying at it, at least formally it is accepted into the fleet. For there was no operating experience, but it was a gain. China plans to have 4 pieces of aircraft carriers, but for now, saying that China has a full-fledged AUG is premature.
    4. Proxima
      Proxima 5 December 2017 16: 02
      +4
      Quote: Dangerous
      But do we need him? ............ Well, yes, the generals and admirals know better

      Well, you give! belay You didn’t confuse an aircraft carrier with an iPhone for an hour? Do you offer to sell it or put it into scrap, as "morally obsolete"? Remember how, for example, the battleship Marat sunk by Rudel (Petropavlovsk since 1911) was raised and modernized under Stalin, and he also served us. Upgrading is always much more economical than rebuilding.
      1. Yarik
        Yarik 5 December 2017 16: 25
        +3
        An aircraft carrier is such a thing with catapults. Steam or electromagnetic there. A slide for sledding .... recourse
        1. Kurare
          Kurare 5 December 2017 19: 25
          +7
          Quote: Yarik
          An aircraft carrier is such a thing with catapults. Steam or electromagnetic there. And a slide for sledding ...

          So all British aircraft carriers are slides for sledding? And during the Falkland conflict there were no aircraft carriers? laughing Thanks, very smiled!
          1. Yarik
            Yarik 5 December 2017 19: 31
            0
            Yes, that's all. Acting in isolation from ground-based bases (sorry), and only such activity seems to be somehow in demand for an aircraft carrier (Russian, here are the nuances), for example, you cannot do without EW aircraft. Well, here we go, with a I am in...."
            1. Kurare
              Kurare 5 December 2017 20: 06
              +2
              On American aircraft carriers, for example, a special version of the F-18 Growler is used as EW aircraft. To do the same for Kuznetsov, for example, on the basis of the MiG-29K is quite possible, just give me the money.
              1. Yarik
                Yarik 5 December 2017 20: 27
                0
                Radius? How much can "hang"? on the 29th you can hang. Probably. But ...
                1. Kurare
                  Kurare 5 December 2017 20: 37
                  +5
                  Since the F-18 has always suffered from a short-range problem. On Superhornet, it was partially decided, but still, compared to the same F-14, this is not enough.

                  And for an EW aircraft, hanging is just not the most important thing. They usually work together with a strike group.
            2. Foamas
              Foamas 5 December 2017 20: 31
              0
              You can install a solid fuel accelerator SPRD-99,
              then the An-24 will take off from the springboard.

    5. Kurare
      Kurare 5 December 2017 16: 31
      +9
      Quote: Dangerous
      Do we need him? Use it in conflicts like Syriac?

      In the form in which he was in Syria, his effectiveness was, to put it mildly, not high. It was the first combat application of “Kuznetsov” and, of course, not everything went smoothly.

      Everyone says "why do we need it when there is a ground base?" And when she is gone, then what? And the cover of the Oka fleet, which, as I hope, Russia will still build, what to do? Or will we just swing muscles right in front of the house?

      Write-off, sale, etc. Kuznetsova will mean the loss of carrier-based aircraft in the Russian fleet. It will be almost impossible to restore it. There are no more people like Timur Apakidze and probably are not expected. The fact that carrier-based aircraft survived in the 90s is a Russian miracle, i.e. contrary to all that was destined for her.
    6. Topotun
      Topotun 5 December 2017 17: 06
      +3
      And if you need to show our flag near the coast where there is no air base? Let it be.
      1. Winnie76
        Winnie76 5 December 2017 17: 44
        +2
        Quote: Topotun
        And if you need to show our flag near the coast where there is no air base? Let it be

        What if the Martians attack? It’s easier and more important to set up databases. Nobody will let them go to the bottom. And the planes do not need to put on gum, in Syria it ended sadly.
        1. Dart2027
          Dart2027 5 December 2017 19: 41
          0
          Quote: Winnie76
          It’s easier and more important to set up databases

          Two questions. Show permissions from those countries where you are going to build them, and the estimate on expenses for construction.
        2. Topotun
          Topotun 6 December 2017 10: 40
          +1
          Do you think it’s cheaper to maintain bases especially on foreign territory? Dee and destroy them is not much harder.
    7. Burbon
      Burbon 5 December 2017 17: 55
      +2
      Quote: Dangerous
      Do we need him?

      to you - no, but to us - Yes!
    8. the most important
      the most important 5 December 2017 21: 39
      +1
      Quote: Dangerous
      Do we need him? Use it in conflicts like Syriac? Well, we have an air base there. And there are hardly any other tasks for him.

      YOU, sir, must have missed the news, as the Americans beat the Tomahawks in Syria. They freely approached the coast of Lebanon and launched a bunch of rockets. But with Kuznetsov in the eastern Mediterranean, this feint with ears would be difficult. In general, the fleet is also needed in order to protect itself from gifts from the sea from potential friends.
    9. Manul
      Manul 6 December 2017 00: 09
      0
      Quote: Dangerous
      Well, we have an air base there.

      Fair? We got the argument that we do not need an aircraft carrier. About Mistral they said the same. And how Syria began, so aware. So is the aircraft carrier. And if there is no airfield? And if on its own territory the bridgehead is beaten off from the sea? Airborne cover? Look for submarines? This stamp that the aircraft carrier we do not need is already annoying. You have been inspired and you are all pecking like magpies.
    10. Cxnumx
      Cxnumx 6 December 2017 06: 39
      0
      Quote: Dangerous
      Do we need him?

      Yeah, really, why does Russia need an aircraft carrier cruiser that has no analogues in NATO, we have them like dirt, right? No.
      say some garbage. Khrushchev recalls: replace everything that is possible with rockets and sleep peacefully. the same logic.
  2. NEXUS
    NEXUS 5 December 2017 15: 39
    +5
    The issue of Nakhimov’s modernization is more relevant ... they say that everything is going according to plan, but 5 years of this very modernization have gone and there is no way to see its end. And the main caliber, Zircon, Nakhimych, everything is foggy and incomprehensible. At the same time, Polement-Redoubt is also unclear whether it was brought to mind or processed with a file.
    1. Nasrat
      Nasrat 5 December 2017 15: 49
      +1
      Quote: NEXUS
      ... but 5 years went of this very modernization and its end has not yet been seen ....


      good exactly - not to see !!! Would leave the ship as a museum - a museum of the USSR!
    2. avt
      avt 5 December 2017 16: 49
      +1
      Quote: NEXUS
      More relevant is the issue of modernization of Nakhimov ...

      request Then ,, Lazareva. "And ,, Kuzyu" would be good for the Chinese to sell, but there’s no replacement for him request Now, if they laid a new .....
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS 5 December 2017 17: 19
        +3
        Quote: avt
        Then, Lazarev. "

        Lazarev is likely to be scrapped ... it's easier to build a new one. His condition is much worse than that of Nakhimych, and the latter has been modernized for 5 years. And for the money, this whole modernization is apparently very elegantly obtained. Moreover, after the turn, Petya will go to remake after Nakhimov. So, most likely you should forget about Lazarev.
        Quote: avt
        Now, if they laid a new .....

        I have already spoken about the speedy laying of the destroyer Leader many times. But ... we would let the 22350M frigates into the series to start with a good one.
        1. Dart2027
          Dart2027 5 December 2017 19: 49
          +1
          Quote: NEXUS
          Yes, and the main caliber, Zircon
          So it was said that Zircon will be unified with PU Caliber. Simply put, until there are Zircons, you can safely walk with Caliber and Onyx, and then just recharge.
  3. dr.star75
    dr.star75 5 December 2017 15: 43
    +2
    Does repair depend on the availability of money? if there are very few of them, will the number on board be painted and that’s all? request
  4. Maalkavianin
    Maalkavianin 5 December 2017 15: 50
    +1
    I hoped that Kuznetsov would be firmly updated, and judging by the latest statements ... To scrapping him. Since they don’t really want to upgrade, it’s better to waste. Or sell it to someone if necessary.
  5. HEATHER
    HEATHER 5 December 2017 16: 01
    +3
    It seems that Nakhimov is no longer following the plan. The dates for the year have been moved. I will not confirm, inaccurate inva. But on the slipway everything works in three shifts. It is well shown in the Military Acceptance. And this is the spring video of this year.
  6. Galleon
    Galleon 5 December 2017 16: 23
    +4
    TAKR “Kuznetsov” is a landmark ship, having such a ship in service and skillfully using it is a political issue. To write off such a steamer is a domestic political issue, to play to lower your own rating. The fact that “Nakhimov” has been under repair for 5 years — it does not scratch anyone and does not create emotions in society — he can stand there for another 10 years and no one will ask anyone for that, thick iron will not drown. And "Kuznetsov" is a certain symbol, plays a role in the media, a positive role ...
    Oh, ma ..., if only for this role it was repaired quickly - for a year, for example. And then they will introduce the steamer into a coma - and for years ... They can not do otherwise. I'm already starting to think that it was very cool under the Union of Kronstadt to carry out an average repair of 1134A in 3 years.
    1. dr.star75
      dr.star75 5 December 2017 17: 17
      0
      Unfortunately, it will not work out of repair ..
      1. Kurare
        Kurare 5 December 2017 19: 32
        +3
        Quote: dr.star75
        Unfortunately, it will not work out of repair ..

        Vanguete or "all gone"? winked
  7. Viktorfi
    Viktorfi 5 December 2017 16: 30
    +3
    In my opinion it is easier to euthanize a patient than torment him ..

    From May 14 to August 20, 2015 the ship was under repair at the dock of the 82nd shipyard in Roslyakovo

    From January to June 15, 2016 he was under repair at the 35th shipyard in Murmansk, where technical readiness was restored before a long sea voyage

    From November 2016 to January 6, 2017, “Admiral Kuznetsov” performed combat missions as part of the operational connection of the far sea zone of the Russian Navy off the coast of Syria. During this campaign, the ship first took part in real hostilities. On November 14, 2016, the MiG-29K crashed during an approach, the pilot survived. He returned to Severomorsk on February 9, 2017.

    And apparently from that time until 2020 it will be repaired, undergoing modernization ...

    More in repair than in work wassat
    1. dr.star75
      dr.star75 5 December 2017 17: 18
      +1
      I almost agree with you. Perhaps it is easier to put next to Aurora.
  8. Jack O'Neill
    Jack O'Neill 5 December 2017 16: 36
    +2
    And how much it will undergo modernization, and how much money will gobble up - is unknown. Only one thing is known that will gobble up a lot ...
    Make your Ford, put particle accelerators, a projector of singular points, a photon gun and an anti-aircraft cluster complex there.
    The same type of missile "Mosquito" as a missile / air defense would be very helpful.
    1. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 5 December 2017 23: 05
      +2
      Quote: Jack O'Neill
      The same type of missile "Mosquito" as a missile / air defense would be very helpful.

      RCC as a missile system !? - ORRRRRIGINALLY !!!
      Quote: Jack O'Neill
      And how much will it go through modernization
      According to the plans - 2 of the year ... But, most likely, they will fit in 3.
      Quote: Jack O'Neill
      how much money will gobble up is unknown.
      It is known: look at the estimates of the order ... But there is no "cheap" defense ...
      Quote: Jack O'Neill
      Make your Ford

      We will not build 100-thousanders ... The latest trend: aircraft-carrying ships with vertical / short take-off and landing aircraft on the 50-60 thousand tons. Do not believe? Read the syntax of the chief of shipbuilding, armament and operation of weapons - deputy commander in chief of the Russian Navy for armament, Vice Admiral Bursuk Viktor Iosifovich: we will develop new aircraft like the F-35 ... for future TAKRs or AVUs like Queen Elizabeth / Charles Degol.
      So, still ahead!
      IMHO.
      1. Jack O'Neill
        Jack O'Neill 5 December 2017 23: 26
        +1
        RCC as a missile system !? - ORRRRRIGINALLY !!!

        And here the Moskit anti-ship missile, when I wrote about the Mosquito light rocket, which, by the way, is used as a missile defense system.
        It is known: look at the estimates of the order ... But there is no "cheap" defense ...

        This "order" will still swell ten times ...
  9. axiles100682
    axiles100682 5 December 2017 17: 58
    +2
    Well, it’s not in vain that they called him a cruiser in the article, not an aircraft carrier. An aircraft carrying cruiser can carry out the tasks of both a cruiser and an aircraft carrier. Even if someone believes that we do not need aircraft carriers, then I think everyone will agree that we need the cruiser
    1. Yarik
      Yarik 5 December 2017 20: 33
      +1
      Universal Soldier only in the movie American. wassat