Kamchatka will receive the latest rocket corvettes

47
The Kamchatka brigade of ships protecting the water area will soon be replenished with the latest missile corvettes. According to Rear Admiral Sergey Lipilin, commander of troops and forces in northeastern Russia, in the near future, the Kamchatka brigade of ships will adopt two corvettes - “Loud” and “Thundering”. In addition, the main base of the Pacific fleet the Perfect Corvette intended for the brigade is located; planned measures are being taken on it to commission constant readiness forces.

Kamchatka will receive the latest rocket corvettes




In the near future, the brigade will be replenished with two corvettes - this is “Loud” and “Thundering”. The corvette “Perfect”, intended for the brigade, is located in the main base of the Pacific Fleet, and there are scheduled events for the entry into the permanent readiness forces.
- He said in an interview with the Red Star.

The Corvettes "Perfect" and "Loud" of the 20380 project are carriers of X-35 Uran anti-ship cruise missiles. Corvette "Thundering" project 20385 - carrier of Caliber-NK cruise missiles.

According to Lipilin, "the deep modernization of one of the small rocket ships of the brigade is coming to an end."

Thus, in the year 2018 we get the old ship, but with improved performance characteristics and several times increased combat potential. The ship will be equipped with the Uranium missile system.
- he said.

As soon as this fleet combat unit returns to the brigade, other compound ships will follow a similar modernization path. As a result, we will be able to extend the life of small rocket ships for several decades, as well as significantly increase their combat potential and power.
- noted the commander, reports "Interfax"
  • Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

47 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    4 December 2017 11: 04
    Our ships are designed to war with an adversary who is much stronger ... and weapons, respectively ... I think one rocket is enough to disable ... any ship it lands in ... and it’s not necessary to sink it. .. It will be ours that will fight to the last, and these will immediately go to base ...
    1. 0
      5 December 2017 15: 03
      It depends on which ship. Some American destroyers with a hole of 5x8 meters after the attack did not go to the bottom. Systems are duplicated, compartments overlap, fire extinguishing systems fire automatically. The survivability of the ship’s composition only increases with each new decade.
      For an aircraft carrier, I think it will take eight pieces. It won’t sink, but will no longer work as a floating airfield.
  2. +4
    4 December 2017 11: 07
    Why is it that Uranium ?! !!! Why not Caliber or Onyx ?! The book about the fleet’s missile weapons is lying around. The book is so 10 years old. Uranus didn’t complain even then. Saying that it was outdated even before it was accepted for service! Damn, this different sizes are simply NOT NEEDED! Even Mosquito has the best data !!!
    1. 0
      4 December 2017 11: 34
      And what a normal rocket ... By the way, quite enough ...
    2. +6
      4 December 2017 11: 35
      Quote: Magic Archer
      But why is it Uranium ?! !!! Why not Caliber or Onyx ?!

      And what do you dislike about the X -35? It is this missile that the Uranus complex is equipped with. Unified under the Ball missile system, aircraft carriers.
      Quote: Magic Archer
      The book is about 10 years old. Uranus still did not favor Shirokorad. Having said that it was outdated even before it was accepted for armament! Damn, this variety is simply NOT NEEDED

      Well, if Shirokorad did not complain, then oh!
      Onyx, along with the Caliber, X-35 Uranus and promising Zircon missiles in the next decade, should displace most types of older anti-ship missiles in the Russian Navy. . All of the above missiles are compact, interchangeable and versatile. hi
      1. 0
        4 December 2017 11: 38
        Zircon by 2030 g may displace it.
      2. +2
        4 December 2017 12: 50
        Uranium interchangeability with the rest does not differ at all, there is not even evidence of the possibility of its launch from vertical mines.

        And in general, a small missile is definitely needed too.
    3. +4
      4 December 2017 11: 44
      Quote: Magic Archer
      Why not Caliber or Onyx ?!

      So you will not sink small vessels with these super-missiles. Uranium is very cheap, massive and universal, enters the Coastal Ball, is suspended by a fighter and even by helicopter. You won’t let the supersonic and expensive onyx go through the junior, here’s a compact and cheap thing, it’s launched on targets without strong air defense, missile defense. There should be a whole range of weapons from strategic to ...
    4. +3
      4 December 2017 11: 53
      Quote: Magic Archer
      Why Uranium then ?! !!! Why not Caliber

      The corvettes of project 20380 were laid, even before the successful practical use of the Caliber missiles. After successful combat firing on ISIS in Syria, the Navy leadership decided to install universal launch blocks for the Caliber Onyx missiles on all new ships. But the two vessels, Perfect and Loud, were in the construction phase when conversion was not possible. Ships with Caliber received project number 20385
    5. +1
      4 December 2017 12: 11
      Quote: Magic Archer
      But why is it Uranium ?! !!! Why not Caliber or Onyx ?!

      When the corvettes were designed, there were no calibers yet.
  3. +6
    4 December 2017 11: 07
    Well ... We can build when we want, and read such news early in the morning early ... good
    1. +2
      4 December 2017 12: 28
      hi support comrade!
      1. +3
        4 December 2017 16: 41
        Quote: 1331M
        Well ... We can build when we want, and read such news early in the morning early ... good

        Alexy Yurievich drinks hi Monday, though evening, but for such news, not a sin and drinks drinks drinks
  4. +2
    4 December 2017 11: 10
    In the near future, when is this? Most likely, or under the Christmas tree or next year.
    And the modernized RTO - is this, probably, the Gadfly with 16 Uranus?
    1. +1
      4 December 2017 13: 38
      Thundering - I'll bet on 2019. Here he is now. At the same time, he has a new radar station - for which there are high hopes and for which proceedings are already underway, including judicial ones. In 2018 it is pushed for testing. But they’ll close them quickly. Plus, the transition to the Pacific Fleet.
  5. +4
    4 December 2017 11: 11
    Perfect, Loud, Thundering - this is power, especially for the protection of SSBNs pr. 955 in Vilyuchinsk
    Having the 3 HOOK, like that of the BOD, they will drive Virginia and the Elk away from the Kuril Islands, Kamchatka and the Commander Islands
    1. +4
      4 December 2017 11: 31
      “Loud!” “Thundering!” is it to make it easier for divers?
      1. +1
        4 December 2017 11: 38
        “Loud!” “Thundering!” is it to make it easier for divers?

        wrong wording, rather - the use of diverse fleet forces to organize combat patrols of strategic missile carriers
        1. +6
          4 December 2017 11: 51
          I mean - they make noise in the names lol
          1. +1
            4 December 2017 12: 52
            The names are historical, reception, as I understand it.
      2. +4
        4 December 2017 11: 52
        Quote: novel xnumx
        “Loud!” “Thundering!” is it to make it easier for divers?

        Not Roma, this shtob was not scary lol
        Welcome hi
        1. +3
          4 December 2017 12: 11
          great! Congratulations, did you get a compensation for the ban? laughing
          1. +5
            4 December 2017 13: 17
            Sergey, Roman, I welcome you hi And I have a version on the names of the ships. They are sharpened so that the enemy HEATED where he should. Even the names correspond to this. (Seryoga, just do not throw heavy objects, this is just my amateur version). Roma, and you notice that he is less than a full admiral than you are before a lieutenant general. And his epaulettes are appropriate. Ask, can share experience. wink drinks
            1. +3
              4 December 2017 13: 22
              great! hi drinks so he has a real title, go. taller, and I'm so old and die (not soon, I hope)
              1. +5
                4 December 2017 13: 41
                So what? Higher, then it doesn’t stay too long. And you, too, for some reason it seems to me personally. wink And in general, it’s time for you to exchange land epaulettes for aviation. If you don’t know how, write me a PM - I’ll explain what needs to be done. good drinks
  6. +3
    4 December 2017 11: 14
    The systematic strengthening of the eastern borders of Russia is deliberate. Keep up the pace and have enough money!
    1. +2
      4 December 2017 11: 43
      that would be enough money!


  7. +2
    4 December 2017 11: 15
    It is not clear why such a motley in the arsenal ... why the Uranus surrendered? Would put either Caliber-NK or Onyx.
    1. +1
      4 December 2017 11: 28
      Quote: NEXUS
      Would put either Caliber-NK or Onyx.

      budget ..... everything is decided by the budget ....
      1. +2
        4 December 2017 11: 33
        Quote: Burbon
        budget ..... everything is decided by the budget ....

        Already in another thread wrote about Karakurt ...
        If we lived within our means, given the money that was stolen and exported over a hill, we would have had an aircraft carrier fleet for a long time.
        1. +1
          4 December 2017 11: 41
          Quote: NEXUS
          If we lived within our means, given the money that was stolen and exported over a hill, we would have had an aircraft carrier fleet for a long time.

          I am in the know .... bureaucrats are sometimes planted and how much dough they find? ... and how many they don’t find? ... even Rodchenkov received 600000 rubles in RUSADA .... how is this to be understood?
          1. +3
            4 December 2017 11: 49
            Quote: Burbon
            .this is how to understand it?

            All this Kudrinskaya murmur, which has settled in the economic sector so far in power ... until that moment we will stand and look sadly into the distance, wave a white handkerchief, under the farewell of the Slav woman leaving our money over the hill.
    2. +3
      4 December 2017 11: 32
      confuse the enemy so that he doesn’t even know what to prepare for
    3. +1
      4 December 2017 12: 58
      20385 is small for both universality and Callibres, in addition, this project also suffered from the general misfortune of Russian shipbuilding in recent years - engines + sanctions.

      It was planned for the MTU diesel engine, when they refused to sell the diesel engine, it was replaced by a domestic engine, but with a domestic engine, the driving characteristics, which were not outstanding anyway, fell to "quite so-so."

      It is also interesting that the new corvettes 20386, which the frigates are almost catching up with in terms of displacement, are still being built under the Uranus. This is despite the fact that the presence of UKKS provides advantages for the PLO, which these ships are likely to do most of the time. Apparently, after all, there is a niche for Uranus as well.
  8. +6
    4 December 2017 11: 31
    Again a message from the future. In fact, it has not yet happened, but the fools have already jumped.
    Well ... We can build when we want, and read such news early in the morning.
    With such news, when we are promised in the near future, the entire media space is littered. But we live today.
  9. +2
    4 December 2017 11: 50
    Initially, “Thundering” is the legendary destroyer of the SF and the corvette of the same name should have served there, but since everything is so sad with the new Pacific Fleet ships, I had to make a decision to transfer it ... so I don’t see any special reasons for joy, trishkin kaftan
  10. +1
    4 December 2017 11: 56
    It is very good!! But it would be necessary to launch the Breeze project into production:
    1. +1
      4 December 2017 13: 02
      Not a fact, it is not clear that this corvette with PLO
      1. 0
        4 December 2017 15: 15
        Quote: alexmach
        it is not clear that this corvette with PLO

        With PLO, this is most likely a frigate, i.e. Gorshkovs. A narrower corvette - RCC, light air defense, artillery.

        Although a large cannon and helicopters are like a 5th wheel cart. It would be better drones and more RCC - SAM.
        1. +1
          4 December 2017 15: 40
          Well then. The main value of the corvette is that it is multi-purpose. 20380 have on board a serious hack. That’s the truth with his anti-submarine armament, he’s doing something like this. But here everything very much depends on the tactics of application, maybe he doesn’t really need it for some reason.
          Frigates will not be in reserve for all the seas, and it is unprofitable to build separate BOD-IPC. Although it might be simpler than a balanced universal ship.
    2. 0
      4 December 2017 15: 03
      Quote: Tektor
      it would be necessary to launch the Breeze project into production:

      And what’s the way to protect the crew on these ships other than air defense systems? Are there armored capsules or armory fortunetelling in case of war - lucky - no luck? It’s clear that armor is more expensive, but why for war paper ships? And so, the more survivors, the more concern for the sailor, because the attitude to pawn meat in the past? And then we still have "mental attacks" from the movie Chapaev.

      Although tankers were taken care of, it would be time to remember others as well, the more secure and satisfying the army, the stronger. Stop throwing yourself under the tanks screaming - For the Motherland, for Stalin. fellow
  11. +3
    4 December 2017 12: 09
    From the project, to the embodiment in metal, time passes ... in different ways.
    In our realities, even the construction of something designed yesterday was already an event.
    Saying that we need a lot more, as they have, the most advanced powers ... Well this is unrealistic.
    The asymmetric answer is already the answer, not the whining that everything is gone.
    Want. what would be powerful and menacing, as in the old days ... not worth it.
  12. 0
    4 December 2017 13: 49
    From a cannon on sparrows ... Uranus is small and cheap ... relatively ... a rocket ... ideal for small targets ... as for ... out of date ... no, it’s constantly being upgraded ...
  13. 0
    4 December 2017 14: 00
    Our surface Pacific Fleet in such a terrible state,
    that there every new ship for happiness.
    There, if in a good way, almost all ships ask for needles.
    The parade on Navy Day looks like a parade of patients at a nursing home.
  14. +1
    4 December 2017 14: 11
    in theory, weapons should be combined, uranium is good only against low-security, low-tonnage targets, without its own pro / air defense, against the fleet that surpasses, it is necessary to arm yourself with non-subsonic missiles. because corvettes have no opportunity to oversaturate air defense with goals, stupidly not putting enough launchers into such tonnage.
  15. +1
    4 December 2017 15: 09
    Kamchatka brigade of ships protecting the water area
    And on the Kuril Islands they were planning something. Here the fleet would be replaced while afloat.
    1. +2
      4 December 2017 15: 10
      Replace the fleet ... for now, at least it’s normal to contain what it is!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"