Military Review
Sign in Sign up

Pushkov commented on the words of the American ambassador on the conditions for the abolition of anti-Russian sanctions

39
Russian parliamentarian Alexei Pushkov commented on the statement by US Ambassador to the Russian Federation John Huntsman about the conditions for lifting the sanctions on Moscow, recalling the American invasion of Iraq, the bombing of Libya, and the division of Yugoslavia, reports RIA News.




We learned from Ambassador Huntsman - for the United States important issues of international law and territorial integrity. This is apparently a new trend: with Kosovo, Iraq, Libya was different,
wrote a Russian senator on Twitter.

Earlier, the US ambassador to Moscow, Huntsman, said that the lifting of sanctions on Russia is possible only after "resolving the issue with Ukraine." At the same time, he explained that Washington intervened in the Ukrainian conflict, since “issues of international law and territorial integrity” are important for him.

The first deputy chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the Federation Council, Vladimir Dzhabarov, in turn, called Huntsman’s statement unconstructive, recalling that Russia is not a party to the internal Ukrainian conflict.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. 1331M
    1331M 3 December 2017 10: 07 New
    +8
    Earlier, the US ambassador in Moscow, Huntsman, said that the lifting of sanctions against Russia is possible only after "resolving the issue with Ukraine."
    And then ... laughing laughing laughing Think of something else ... wink
    1. 210ox
      210ox 3 December 2017 10: 16 New
      +5
      The question of sanctions is not a question of Russia and Ukraine .. This is a question of the employees themselves and does not concern us.
      Quote: 1331M
      Earlier, the US ambassador in Moscow, Huntsman, said that the lifting of sanctions against Russia is possible only after "resolving the issue with Ukraine."
      And then ... laughing laughing laughing Think of something else ... wink
      1. Pirogov
        Pirogov 3 December 2017 10: 31 New
        +4
        Quote: 210ox
        The question of sanctions is not a question of Russia and Ukraine .. This is a question of the employees themselves and does not concern us.

        This is a question for all the free countries so far, if the United States allows itself in relation to the Russian Federation what other countries expect ?!
        1. bulvas
          bulvas 3 December 2017 11: 15 New
          +5
          Earlier, the US ambassador in Moscow, Huntsman, said that the lifting of sanctions against Russia is possible only after "resolving the issue with Ukraine."


          Then immediately the question arises about Transnistria, Abkhazia, South Ossetia,
          then again they will make a fuss about the oppression of gays, then bestiality, someone else.

          So we’ll turn into “non-stop”, and the sanctions will be forgotten, just no one will hear us, they will brush aside
    2. Spartanez300
      Spartanez300 3 December 2017 10: 33 New
      15
      It is impossible to agree on something with the United States because they cannot get rid of the idea that they are no longer the navel of the land and that Russia has already risen from its knees, with which it is necessary to negotiate and not impose its will, so they will always and everywhere fool Russia only possible. From all the above, we can only state that only the grave will correct the hunchback. And they can put their own conditions to hell.
      1. Lopatov
        Lopatov 3 December 2017 10: 44 New
        10
        Quote: Spartanez300
        therefore, they will always and everywhere spoil Russia wherever possible

        That's right.
        No "new trend". The United States currently in fact illegally holds its armed forces on the territory of an independent state (Syria), in addition to supporting separatists in Syria and Iraq.
        They are simply unhappy with the existence of Russia as a whole. Regardless of the actions or inaction of Russia, regardless of the socio-political system in it or its ideology
        And you can find a lot of reasons for sanctions.
        As for their cancellation, the faith in the Americans has long ceased to exist. Recall the Jackson-Vanik Amendment. For 21 years after removing the obstacles to emigration, they thought whether to cancel its effect on Russia or not. Moreover, they linked its abolition with the introduction of new sanctions under the Law on the Protection of Thieves, sorry, the Magnitsky Law.
    3. sabakina
      sabakina 3 December 2017 14: 48 New
      +6
      Oh, 1331M, well, you touched on the topic ...! "I certainly believe you ..." Yes, we believe, BUT only to yours!
  2. demo
    demo 3 December 2017 10: 09 New
    +6
    We learned from Ambassador Huntsman - for the United States important issues of international law and territorial integrity. This is apparently a new trend: with Kosovo, Iraq, Libya was different,
    wrote a Russian senator on Twitter.

    For Pushkov:
    Iraq - Russia supported the decision on the invasion.
    Libya - the Russian Federation was silent.
    Kosovo - Russia at that time simply turned away.
    Silenok would not be enough to confront. And the authorities themselves knew who.
    That’s the whole answer to Pushkov.
    1. GRF
      GRF 3 December 2017 10: 14 New
      +6
      What is a side job?
      Huntsman does not press?
    2. dubovitskiy.1947
      dubovitskiy.1947 3 December 2017 10: 19 New
      +8
      Quote: demo
      We learned from Ambassador Huntsman - for the United States important issues of international law and territorial integrity. This is apparently a new trend: with Kosovo, Iraq, Libya was different,
      wrote a Russian senator on Twitter.

      For Pushkov:
      Iraq - Russia supported the decision on the invasion.
      Libya - the Russian Federation was silent.
      Kosovo - Russia at that time simply turned away.
      Silenok would not be enough to confront. And the authorities themselves knew who.
      That’s the whole answer to Pushkov.

      So, in your opinion, is Russia to blame for not using nuclear weapons against the aggressor in Yugoslavia, Libya,
      and everywhere? We then had problems with the usual parts, but only the nuclear ones were normal then. Are you crazy, dear?
    3. Langf
      Langf 3 December 2017 11: 42 New
      +5
      Iraq - Russia supported the decision on the invasion.
      Libya - the Russian Federation was silent.
      Kosovo - Russia at that time simply turned away.
      Silenok would not be enough to confront. And the authorities themselves knew who.

      Exactly - do not connect the unconnectable. If, for example, you, sir, hanging by the edge, were asked whose Crimea, then no one would have declared an attempt on the integrity of the state. There is action, but there are circumstances. Pushkov speaks of committed unlawful acts, and not of a sincere or forced reaction to them. And you perfectly understand this: "... the strength would not be enough." Che something?
    4. KaPToC
      KaPToC 3 December 2017 12: 08 New
      +4
      Quote: demo
      Silenok would not be enough to confront. And the authorities themselves knew who.
      That’s the whole answer to Pushkov.

      Are you ready to fight around the world until the last Russian soldier?

      Quote: demo
      Iraq - Russia supported the decision on the invasion.

      Quote: demo
      Libya - the Russian Federation was silent.

      Quote: demo
      Kosovo - Russia at that time simply turned away.

      Why should Russia protect these countries? No one has answered this question yet.
  3. Vintovkin
    Vintovkin 3 December 2017 10: 12 New
    +2
    Quote: demo
    And the authorities themselves knew who.

    And what has the power changed? Nifiga a fig fellow
    Just don’t push about Medvedev, otherwise Putin won in Georgia, and Dimon surrendered Libya tongue And at the same time)
    1. GRF
      GRF 3 December 2017 10: 18 New
      0
      The ancestors were then, but now a new generation and voila ...)
      Democracy however?
    2. Maverick78
      Maverick78 3 December 2017 11: 15 New
      +2
      I read an interview with Kissinger at one time ... there was a phrase saying that the harsh reaction of Russia in Syria is explained by what Libya did not do as agreed. That is, in Libya there were agreements that the West violated. I think these agreements explain the passivity of Russia.
  4. Fedorov
    Fedorov 3 December 2017 10: 16 New
    +1
    Russian parliamentarian

    It infuriates me a little - they are sitting in the Duma, and not in parliament, but mowing down the west. sad It is necessary for the Duma to think that at least the rackets would not fall from Medvedev’s “boy”.
    1. GRF
      GRF 3 December 2017 10: 24 New
      +1
      Please translate the word "mowing", the atom is not clear what your envy is ...
    2. GRF
      GRF 3 December 2017 10: 38 New
      +1
      In the Duma, Medvedev’s son organized tennis competitions that prevent deputies from thinking. Did I understand your clarification correctly?
      I'm tired, I’m dull, I went to sleep ...
  5. Jedi
    Jedi 3 December 2017 10: 16 New
    +4
    The USA in its repertoire, as always. no
    1. GRF
      GRF 3 December 2017 10: 25 New
      0
      Freedom to the Texans!
    2. aszzz888
      aszzz888 3 December 2017 10: 34 New
      +2
      Jedi Today, 10:16 a.m. New
      The USA in its repertoire, as always. no

      ... like blanks - the amplitude of motion is always the same ...
      1. Jedi
        Jedi 3 December 2017 10: 38 New
        +5
        So they believed that they are “exceptional”. sad
  6. Vintovkin
    Vintovkin 3 December 2017 10: 29 New
    +1

    It seems quite recently ..
  7. ul_vitalii
    ul_vitalii 3 December 2017 10: 32 New
    11
    These ambassadors, donkeys, deer listen only time to lose. Let’s take Michael Bohm, the star of our evening TV, over twenty years of life in Russia, not even any changes in the brains and consciousness, although he has work, he has poor family relationships, has a child, the ability to communicate with Russians of different levels and affluence.
  8. aszzz888
    aszzz888 3 December 2017 10: 32 New
    +1
    ... the merikathios have played in the "exceptional" ... their media help, and the utterances of all sorts of different half-personalities are the product of rabies to influence the actions of Russia ... bully
  9. Sergey53
    Sergey53 3 December 2017 10: 39 New
    +3
    They live by the rule that the law begins to act from the moment it is proclaimed. And it has no retroactive force. And all this is thought up in the course of receipt of questions. Here they live so calmly.
  10. prior
    prior 3 December 2017 10: 58 New
    +1
    What nafig "international law" ?!
    There are only American "Wishlist" ....
  11. Egorovich
    Egorovich 3 December 2017 11: 13 New
    +1
    Matrasia, would you go with your sanctions in the forest.
  12. turbris
    turbris 3 December 2017 11: 28 New
    +2
    The whole world probably laughs when the United States begins to talk about international law, but the main thing is that they themselves do not understand that their policy of double standards is not a revelation to anyone, they continue it with enviable persistence, sneezing absolutely at all.
  13. Sergei75
    Sergei75 3 December 2017 11: 35 New
    +1
    I wonder why we are so worried about the sanctions, we ourselves can do everything, can they be blamed for us, or "not everything is calm in the Kingdom of Denmark"?
    It seems that not everything is as rosy with us as the environment of the “great Pu” wants to convince us of this, and the rich - get richer, the poor - are impoverished even more, requisitions are growing, and the exhaust is zero.
    Russia has become a raw materials appendage of developed and developing countries, we don’t have to conquer, we give everything we need at an affordable price for them, and so that the people don’t buzz we are scared of NATO.
  14. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 3 December 2017 12: 06 New
    0
    important "issues of international law and territorial integrity"
    The main thing is that they lie without batting an eye and believe in themselves. Then they shrug and wonder, but what for us?
  15. razved
    razved 3 December 2017 12: 49 New
    +1
    Comments on Twitter ... Anyone read them? And if he reads, does he pay attention?
  16. turbris
    turbris 3 December 2017 16: 42 New
    +1
    Quote: Sergei75
    Russia has become a raw materials appendage of developed and developing countries, we don’t have to conquer, we give everything we need at an affordable price for them, and so that the people don’t buzz we are scared of NATO

    Well, he started again, who is about Thomas, and he is about Erema - what does it mean to become, why the appendage? I want to prove everything that sanctions affect? Of course they affect, but not in the way you want people like you. Why should Russia not trade in its raw material wealth? Not tired of criticizing your own country, or is it not your country?
  17. Suhow
    Suhow 3 December 2017 18: 39 New
    0
    Washington intervened in the Ukrainian conflict because the questions of law and territorial integrity are crucial for it ...- TALES for those deprived of their brains. They got here because they wanted and want to dominate the planet and at the moment only Russia and China pose a threat to the striped. But Russia is less is compliant and behaving defiantly. You in the Russian Federation now need to survive and not bend down to reach out to other states. As long as Iran, for example, supports you in the similarity of interests, and later as a strong and reliable Ally.
    1. Conductor
      Conductor 4 December 2017 23: 04 New
      0
      Is China more accommodating than the Russian Federation? Poor you know these Chinese)))
  18. Slovak
    Slovak 3 December 2017 18: 40 New
    0
    Waiting for Russia to resolve the issue with Ukraine? So you need to decide. For example, to introduce troops, hang on poles from Petit to the last banderlog of all Natsiks and announce the revival of the Ukrainian SSR. Mattresses and the EU for a month will go into a binge, sober up and calm down. That's all.
  19. Vlad5307
    Vlad5307 4 December 2017 00: 33 New
    0
    Washington intervened in the Ukrainian conflict, since “issues of international law and territorial integrity” are important to it.

    the country in which they are going to build their military bases! And then some Russians broke off all the buzz for them, and now even in Syria they have exposed them as accomplices of terrorists, well, how not to introduce the obsessions! laughing laughing
  20. fif21
    fif21 4 December 2017 06: 26 New
    0
    SSA sets Russia conditions? laughing Yes, for the enth ambassador
    Even I wouldn’t go
    And he gazes, scoundrel,
    To stibrate from the table!

    He’s all Yes and Yes,
    Meanwhile, everything eats and eats.
    Turn away - he's Paul Rasei
    Swallow in one sitting!

    Russia is too tough for you, hamburger eaters wassat
    1. turbris
      turbris 4 December 2017 10: 29 New
      0
      The United States and North Korea have already crap one's pants, so what else can they talk about Ukraine. The great cowboys were not scary at all.