Patrushev: a military solution to the North Korean crisis will not come as a surprise to Moscow

51
Russia is calculating the consequences of a potential military resolution of the situation with the DPRK and are preparing for this, so that such a development will not be a surprise, reports RIA News statement by Security Council Secretary Nikolai Patrushev.





When asked whether there was a threat to Pyongyang because of the actions of Pyongyang, he answered: “Of course, there are.”

We are practically on the border with them. Therefore, we are interested in everything being resolved in a politico-diplomatic way,
said Patrushev.

We calculate it, get ready. It will not be a surprise to us
he said, answering the question whether Russia is preparing measures in case of a military solution to the problem.

Recall, the DPRK on Wednesday night conducted a launch of a new Hwason-15 ballistic missile. The altitude of the flight at the maximum point was 4475 km, the flight range is 950 km. The flight lasted 53 minutes, the rocket fell in the exclusive economic zone of Japan, 250 kilometers from Aomori Prefecture. According to a preliminary analysis of the military experts of the USA, Japan and South Korea, the rocket tested on Wednesday surpasses all previous ones in its characteristics.

Earlier, Russia and China offered Pyongyang to declare a moratorium on nuclear tests and missile launches, and to South Korea and the United States to refrain from conducting exercises in the region to stabilize the situation on the peninsula, but Washington ignored this initiative.
51 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    1 December 2017 09: 10
    Thank God that the authorities are aware of this. No matter how my forecast about a bonfire in a third country comes true with the throwing of firewood and transfer to the third and final world.
    1. +12
      1 December 2017 09: 13
      It is necessary to calculate all the options - this is correct. But I do not believe in a military decision. What is the USA for? Well, let's say they wrap the DPRK, what's next? How will they justify the presence of military bases on the territory of the South Caucasus and Japan? .... Personally, I believe that the DPRK is deeply purple for Americans. The longer it will be possible to frighten the world with the North Korean regime, the more there will be more reasons to scream about the need for bases in the South Caucasus. and against whom they are directed, and so clearly ...
      1. +15
        1 December 2017 09: 16
        In my opinion, it's just a show off that they’re ready ...
        Ready to do, take what? In the event of a military continuation of the problem ... To fight the United States, with the help of China, or to worry again?
        If you are at war with the USA, are you still ready to fight in Europe? But already alone!
        It’s scary to even think ...!
        1. +2
          1 December 2017 10: 05
          Quote: Anarchist
          In my opinion, it's just a show off that they’re ready ...
          Ready to do, take what? In the event of a military continuation of the problem ... To fight the United States, with the help of China, or to worry again?
          If you are at war with the USA, are you still ready to fight in Europe? But already alone!
          It’s scary to even think ...!

          Is it for Korea or what?)) If the United States is hammering powerfully on Korean nuclear and military facilities, then we will not bother, but express our protest, firm and decisive, we will call for negotiations - this is the maximum that we can do. And North Korea, which has received the cabbage soup, will doubt its Kim, and the brewing of familiar compotes will begin. The result is clear.

          “- I know who I am for, the white cap. I am for blacks, of course. ”

          Bring to the bottom in Bruges
          1. +1
            1 December 2017 10: 31
            And North Korea, which has received the soup, will doubt its Kim, and the brewing of familiar compotes will begin. The result is clear.

            You come in a little topic. Read something about the DPRK, about their potential, and then comment.
          2. 0
            1 December 2017 17: 51
            Quote: Leeds
            If the United States and fucking powerfully on Korean nuclear and military facilities, then we do not care,

            Yes?
            It seems that you don’t understand what it’s about, we’ll take care of how, even before using our anti-aircraft missile defense, against the US strike, we don’t need a radioactive desert instead of the DPRK and especially the Yankees on our borders.
        2. +4
          1 December 2017 15: 45
          Quote: Anarchist
          If you are at war with the USA, are you still ready to fight in Europe? But already alone!

          Excuse me, does Europe have the strength to fight at all? Do not have illusions, today's Europe is not the Europe that was 60-80 years old. And nobody especially is going to fight Europe, because maybe there are Iskanders with YaBCH, X-102, and Caliber ... the question is, does Europe need it?
          Quote: Anarchist
          It’s scary to even think ...!

          It is of course. But who is escalating and who is meddling with his fucking democracy? North Koreans? They are only trying to protect themselves from the spread of democracy, so as not to become another Libya or Syria.
          If we didn’t have nuclear weapons, long ago there would be AUG mattresses on our shores and a war would go on, and the United States would only consider grandmothers behind a puddle while millions died here.
        3. 0
          2 December 2017 14: 01
          Quote: Anarchist
          It’s scary to even think ...!


          Then it is already necessary not to think, but to do. The eyes are scared, and the hands are doing like a speaker.
      2. 0
        1 December 2017 09: 16
        Dear Black! I agree, it’s necessary to calculate how to take measures to minimize the bad consequences, yet our people live there, but this is not yet visible, although they may not say so. But about the military decision, I’m not sure that it is not possible.
        1. +3
          1 December 2017 09: 22
          Quote: andrej-shironov
          But about the military decision, I’m not sure that it is not possible.

          Everything is theoretically possible !! But the benefits from the existence of the DPRK for the United States are much greater than from its destruction .... moreover, the Americans are far from certain that at least one nuclear warhead will not explode in the United States. And this is the end for their authorities!
          1. +5
            1 December 2017 09: 26
            hi
            Quote: Black
            But the benefits from the existence of the DPRK for the United States are much greater than from its destruction ....

            I completely agree. All American whistle-blowing around the DPRK sounds great with a theatrical production. They can just play with it, because Eun is still that mystery.
            1. +4
              1 December 2017 10: 18
              Quote: Jedi
              ... Eun is still that mystery.

              ... Just not for this "X-ray" ... Hi Max wink
              1. +4
                1 December 2017 10: 22
                Sanya hi
                Quote: san4es
                Just not for this "X-ray" ...

                So do not forget the roots of Patrushev. wink
          2. +3
            1 December 2017 09: 28
            You see, in my amateurish view, the United States has "matured" the conditions for the real use of nuclear weapons even with partial damage to themselves. My facts are as follows: Trump was badly driven and he needs to play his muscles in order to rehabilitate himself, the United States is vitally interested in a local conflict near the borders of both Russia and China, to weaken them. And the exchange of blows can take place without the participation of the United States and with the help of South Korea and Japan. Once again, the United States will elegantly throw firewood into the fire with the wrong hands.
            1. +2
              1 December 2017 09: 48
              Quote: andrej-shironov
              Trump was badly driven and he needs to play his muscles in order to rehabilitate himself,

              Playing with “muscles” is one thing, and starting a real war with a state that has nuclear weapons is another
              And the exchange of blows can take place without the participation of the United States and with the help of South Korea and Japan.
              Hardly. The South Caucasus is far from delighted with the prospects of the outbreak of war, and the DPRK is not so naive and has repeatedly stated that in any military situation in the United States they would be foolish. So, the scenario of the war between the North and the South is extremely unprofitable for the South Koreans. (Moreover, Seoul is located near the border, in the zone of destruction of the barrel artillery)
              1. 0
                1 December 2017 09: 51
                And yet, the probability of provocations has not been canceled.
          3. wax
            0
            2 December 2017 13: 44
            And this is the end for their authorities!

            An attack on a country has never led to the end of power; on the contrary, people are rallying. But with the fact that the living DPRK for amers is better than the dead, it is entirely possible to agree. Well this is the favorite song of the USA that Russia defends rogue and chemical terrorists and Russia needs to be isolated.
      3. +2
        1 December 2017 10: 30
        Quote: Black
        Personally, I think that DPRK Americans deep purple

        But this is absolutely accurate. Not for nothing that the states, for decades, have been feeding North Korea in every possible way. On the one hand they scold, and from the back, all humanitarian aid is sent by ships. The states, nosebleeds, need another armed conflict in a strategic region where the interests of China, Russia, and Japan clash, which can be pushed between the foreheads. And here, North Korea as a catalyst is just perfect. I won’t be surprised if Eun is in collusion with the states.
      4. +1
        1 December 2017 10: 47
        Quote: Black
        How will they justify the presence of military bases on the territory of the South Caucasus and Japan? ....

        Naively, the states have not been making excuses for a long time who will ask them.
        1. +2
          1 December 2017 11: 04
          Quote: AID.S
          who will ask them.
          China, for example. smile
          1. +1
            1 December 2017 13: 44
            Quote: Black
            China, for example.

            But how?
      5. +1
        1 December 2017 17: 41
        America needs the DPRK because of the land borders bordering Russia. DPRK serves as a kind of buffer in the event of a war with the Americans.
    2. +3
      1 December 2017 09: 25
      The main thing is that this would not be a surprise for our Far East, for the locals there ... or it’s somehow not comfortable living next to a country where crazy Anglo-Saxons are now burning with a vigorous bomb!
    3. +1
      1 December 2017 09: 25
      Last year, they posted a video about the mass transfer by train of all types of air defense air defense systems to the border with the DPRK in the Primorsky Territory. I think they have increased a lot since that time. From today, joint studies with China on combining the air defense system and the missile defense system have begun. computer modeling of various situations during hours, and their blocking options.
    4. +3
      1 December 2017 11: 47
      Russia has a rich history of victories! Let us remember this behind the hillocks ...
      On December 1, 1896, G.K. Zhukov was born - a Soviet military leader, four times Hero of the Soviet Union, a great commander, one of the main creators of the Victory in the Great Patriotic War.
  2. +1
    1 December 2017 09: 12
    There will be no military solution! Stripes are too cowardly to get involved in a war with those who can at least slightly damage them, give change. Although the hawks are frostbitten there, they will not do this.
    1. +2
      1 December 2017 13: 55
      Quote: Ihrek
      There will be no military solution! Striped too cowardly

      About Iraq, too, they said so ....
      1. 0
        2 December 2017 20: 52
        Quote: AID.S
        Quote: Ihrek
        There will be no military solution! Striped too cowardly

        About Iraq, too, they said so ....


        Iraq did not have weapons of mass destruction; they knew about it.
        1. 0
          3 December 2017 10: 21
          The universal answer is: "They knew about it."
          And I remember how our media analysts prophesied the defeat and heavy losses to the Americans and praised Saddam's army in every way. Honestly, he himself counted on the Iraqis to last longer. And everything went quickly and casually. And all the “cowardice” of the penguins was that instead of bayonet attacks, they hit the enemy from inaccessible distances, using their superiority. And North Korea here is no different from Iraq. Well, there are a couple of vigorous bombs. But they still need to be delivered somehow. And "they" know about it.
          1. 0
            3 December 2017 12: 37
            Quote: AID.S
            The universal answer is: "They knew about it."

            the stripes knew about Iraq's lack of mass destruction - and therefore attacked. And if Iraq had WMDs, the stripes are unlikely to attack.
            1. 0
              3 December 2017 18: 17
              Quote: Ihrek
              And if Iraq

              And if Iraq were the USSR, then they certainly would not have attacked. And where is cowardice? No one supported Iraq, Libya, and therefore they were defeated, they did not grow together in Syria, I hope it will not grow together with Korea either. And if everyone turns their backs on Korea, they will get rid of it, leisurely, as with Iraq.
              1. +1
                3 December 2017 21: 59
                Quote: AID.S
                Quote: Ihrek
                And if Iraq

                And if Iraq were the USSR, then they certainly would not have attacked. And where is cowardice? No one supported Iraq, Libya, and therefore they were defeated, they did not grow together in Syria, I hope it will not grow together with Korea either. And if everyone turns their backs on Korea, they will get rid of it, leisurely, as with Iraq.

                Do not attack in any situation.
                1. 0
                  3 December 2017 23: 34
                  Quote: Ihrek
                  Do not attack in any situation.

                  I hope so.
    2. wax
      +1
      2 December 2017 13: 46
      They are counting such a blow so that it does not become cross-border.
  3. +2
    1 December 2017 09: 13
    the rocket fell in the exclusive economic zone of Japan, 250 kilometers from Aomori Prefecture.
    why is everyone repeating about it? there are international waters, there is no "economic Japanese zone." Do the Japanese sing along with the Yankees? and in order to "eliminate the threat" it is enough to lag behind the DPRK, and not to conduct Yankov exercises in this area.-EVERYTHING !.
  4. +1
    1 December 2017 09: 18
    The Americans are not fools (in some cases), of course, they realize that the response from the DPRK will be tough, they will not climb until they are convinced by all 300% of their superiority ... well, and the fact that Russia is preparing for the military development of the scenario sure. My opinion, the main thing is to create reliable protection in the air defense / missile defense against accidental "surprises" from both sides of the conflict (USA / DPRK), and of course to strengthen the land border with heavy weapons and personnel and aviation.
  5. +2
    1 December 2017 09: 21
    We calculate it, get ready. It will not be a surprise to us
    he said, answering the question whether Russia is preparing measures in case of a military solution to the problem.

    ... The correspondent asked N. Patrushev a naive question ... yeah, they say we are sitting, we husk seeds and wait for the weather from the sea ..
  6. +1
    1 December 2017 09: 22
    The flight height at the maximum point was 4475 km

    O'RLY?
  7. +2
    1 December 2017 09: 23
    It will not be a surprise to us,
    Which is a little calming. But as if for the United States itself, the DPRK’s response to an American military adventure was not a surprise.
  8. 0
    1 December 2017 09: 25
    Patrushev: a military solution to the North Korean crisis will not come as a surprise to Moscow

    It would be better if he said: "Any attempt at a military solution to the North Korean crisis will come as a surprise to Washington."
  9. +1
    1 December 2017 09: 48
    The maximum flight altitude was 4475 kilometers, and the range 950 km. Something smells nonsense ... negative I still agree with the range.
    1. +1
      1 December 2017 10: 33
      Ours also tracked this rocket - so it's true.
  10. +2
    1 December 2017 09: 53
    Well done Patrushev!
    When you see such a face, you understand that this person will stop at nothing! Ascetic. Silver plated. All thoughts of the Motherland, every minute, every second. Pavka Korchagin. Putin was not mistaken in it.
    Eh ... there would be such people in schools, so that children learn to respect the older generation, which left us a flourishing, rich country. So that the child sees an example from the first class! To startle even about the thought of the TEACHER, of the MENTOR!
    1. +1
      1 December 2017 11: 04
      His son is also well done, a strong business man. Russian Agricultural Bank heads. Distributes budget money for the benefit of the prosperity of the agro-industrial complex Powers!
  11. +2
    1 December 2017 10: 20
    Quote: Mikhanishche
    Well done Patrushev!
    When you see such a face, you understand that this person will stop at nothing! Ascetic. Silver plated. All thoughts of the Motherland, every minute, every second. Pavka Korchagin. Putin was not mistaken in it.
    Eh ... there would be such people in schools, so that children learn to respect the older generation, which left us a flourishing, rich country. So that the child sees an example from the first class! To startle even about the thought of the TEACHER, of the MENTOR!

    I won’t be surprised if this comedy club grabs this tirade.
  12. 3vs
    +2
    1 December 2017 10: 26
    Fans at the border will put radioactive dust away from our border?
  13. 0
    1 December 2017 13: 50
    Karachun then the US Congress, led by the Zionists ... and all of the United States as a whole ...
  14. 0
    1 December 2017 13: 51
    Russia cannot transfer nuclear technology and directly nuclear weapons. But the contract does not prohibit the transfer of media. Korea has charges, but with flying missiles is a problem. The solution is on the surface.
  15. 0
    1 December 2017 17: 59
    You just need to pull our missile defense and electronic warfare systems to the borders of the DPRK in case one of the parties wants to "practice" in missile launches!
  16. +1
    1 December 2017 23: 53
    Kim needs America. From whom will they then protect the Japanese and South Koreans, and to whom sorry "securities" will incur their part-time debts. He is a very predictable politician. This is all a theater. The Yankees themselves, under the table, buy amphetamine and burning cigarettes from Kim and sell at home. Big business and everything in share
  17. DPN
    0
    2 December 2017 13: 43
    We hope that KIM is not a Gorbachev, will not surrender the country. The Americans with Gorbachev managed to overwhelm the USSR and ruin almost the entire industry in return having received kapstroy and oligarchs.
    In which case, for the FAR EAST, Americans are required to receive in full.