Military Review

At the North Shipyard they laid the boathouse under the ships of 1 and 2 rank

33
Construction of a new slipway with a height of 75 meters has been launched at the Severnaya Verf shipbuilding plant in St. Petersburg. After the construction is completed, the shipyard will be able to build ships of the first and second rank for the Russian Navy, including promising nuclear destroyers of the Leader type. This was announced by the head of the United Shipbuilding Corporation Alexey Rakhmanov.


At the North Shipyard they laid the boathouse under the ships of 1 and 2 rank


This site will allow us to diversify and organize the production of various marine structures and ships with 250 sizes on 70 meters in the largest construction site.
- quotes the press service of the USC head of the corporation.

The construction of the boathouse is designed for two construction sites in which it will be possible to build ships of the type Leader destroyer, icebreakers, and any large-capacity civilian ships. The construction of a new shipbuilding complex is expected to be completed by 2020 year.

According to the head of USC, after the modernization of production, which should be completed in 2019, Severnaya Verf will become the most efficient shipbuilding enterprise within the corporation.

Recall that the creation of a promising Russian destroyer project 23560 "Leader" is engaged in the Northern design office located in St. Petersburg.
Photos used:
http://m.belta.by/
33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. 210ox
    210ox 30 November 2017 15: 34
    +4
    And rightly so. The Russian fleet needs large surface ships .. Let's remember the beginning of the last century. Two Pacific squadrons were lost .. The color and beauty of the imperial fleet .. And for three decades our fleet was restored and built from small to large ships .. I I mean the time before World War II.
    1. maxim947
      maxim947 30 November 2017 15: 46
      +7
      You forgot to mention that during the revolution, almost the entire fleet of the empire was sunk, which has already been relatively restored, both intentionally with our own hands and by our "allies."
      1. 210ox
        210ox 30 November 2017 16: 00
        +4
        Yes, it is. This is especially true of the Black Sea Fleet.
        Quote: maxim947
        You forgot to mention that during the revolution, almost the entire fleet of the empire was sunk, which has already been relatively restored, both intentionally with our own hands and by our "allies."
        1. Tatar 174
          Tatar 174 30 November 2017 16: 18
          +9
          Very good news! If only in our rural areas in the Chelyabinsk region, agricultural complexes for the production of meat and milk, grain and melons would have been laid, as it was in the Soviet years - this would have been wonderful repeat
          1. Victor N
            Victor N 30 November 2017 17: 20
            +3
            My acquaintance laid all that was, bought two sows and created his own pig farm. No thanks even to him ...
          2. Arzoo
            Arzoo 30 November 2017 23: 25
            +1
            Quote: Tartar 174
            Very good news! If only in our rural areas in the Chelyabinsk region, agricultural complexes for the production of meat and milk, grain and melons would have been laid, as it was in the Soviet years - this would have been wonderful repeat

            I don’t know what you have there in Chelyabinsk, but how would Russia have harvested grain crops this year more than the entire USSR in the best years. repeat
            1. Tatar 174
              Tatar 174 1 December 2017 06: 32
              0
              I apologize that I will continue completely off topic. It is not a matter of the Chelyabinsk region only, but of the whole country. We are now actively trading in oil and gas, but everyone needs it and every day, after all, food can be exported, if there is surplus, receiving money for it. Oil can stop buying by moving on with new technologies for energy production, and food is always needed every day and the need for food in the world is growing. And work in the village, apart from agricultural production, cannot be found otherwise.
          3. ZAV69
            ZAV69 1 December 2017 12: 22
            +1
            You’ll laugh, in the neighboring area they want to lay a large pigsty, and the locals stand up on their hind legs, like we will not allow it.
    2. RASKAT
      RASKAT 30 November 2017 16: 21
      +2
      It is interesting where they managed to put such a boathouse in the territory of the plant, such areas did not seem to be there. Most likely they demolished something. If you share with someone please, it’s very interesting.
      1. 1Leningrad
        1Leningrad 30 November 2017 19: 03
        +3
        They broke up the pier (opposite the island), driven in piles, removed the container terminal.
      2. APASUS
        APASUS 30 November 2017 21: 34
        0
        Quote: RASKAT
        It is interesting where they managed to put such a boathouse in the territory of the plant, such areas did not seem to be there.

        It’s impossible to simply demolish something in this situation, although the enterprise has orders not in the best financial situation. Judging by everything, are there structures that guarantee the next order?
  2. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
    Andrei from Chelyabinsk 30 November 2017 15: 37
    +5
    This site will allow us to diversify and organize the production of various marine structures and ships with 250 sizes on 70 meters in the largest construction site.

    Clear. So the aircraft carriers are not going to build even in the distant future. Sadly
    1. DMoroz
      DMoroz 30 November 2017 15: 41
      +1
      project 23000 "Storm" was also developed in St. Petersburg ... Coincidence? ..
      1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
        Andrei from Chelyabinsk 30 November 2017 16: 25
        +9
        Quote: DMoroz
        project 23000 "Storm"

        There is no project, there is only a stupid layout, moreover, from persons previously not involved in aircraft carriers
      2. NEXUS
        NEXUS 30 November 2017 18: 23
        +4
        Quote: DMoroz
        project 23000 "Storm" was also developed in St. Petersburg ... Coincidence? ..

        The version about the construction of the destroyer Leader sounds much more believable, despite the fact that YaSU already has RITM-200 on the Arctic icebreaker ...
    2. x.andvlad
      x.andvlad 30 November 2017 15: 45
      10
      At this stage, an aircraft carrier is far from the main thing for our Navy.
      1. Sergey39
        Sergey39 30 November 2017 15: 51
        +3
        There was information about the development of light aircraft carriers. So they will go there.
        1. x.andvlad
          x.andvlad 30 November 2017 15: 59
          +6
          I agree. And the UDC will come in. But the main thing is the ships of the distant marine zone of the first rank. We can count them on our fingers, and that's all since the days of the Soviet Union.
          1. akribos
            akribos 1 December 2017 00: 12
            +1
            If aircraft carriers are not needed, then the Leader is all the more unnecessary. Simply, he will not have any combat stability. In the ocean, without an aircraft carrier, there is no reason to stick around. We will be like Iran, which had planned to sail on its own not until the corvette destroyer in the Gulf of Mexico. If you adhere to the coastal doctrine, enough frigates. However, if there is a desire to become a Great Power, AUG is necessary. Unfortunately, no how without it. This is even the Indians understand. Thailand, Australia, Eitai, Italy, Spain, France, England, and the USA are with them. Not to mention the rudiments in Japan, Egypt, Turkey, South Korea, and even Holland.
      2. NEXUS
        NEXUS 30 November 2017 17: 20
        +7
        Quote: x.andvlad
        At this stage, an aircraft carrier is far from the main thing for our Navy.

        Namely ... first escort ships of the first and second rank need to be built new, and support vessels. For the first time, ships of the first rank have been in service for 40 years, and these are all ships of the times of the USSR. We need much more the destroyer Leader now than the aircraft carrier Storm. Yes, and light destroyers with gas turbines would not be in the way, although there is an opinion that the frigates of project 22350M should fill this niche.
        1. Alex_59
          Alex_59 30 November 2017 22: 51
          +3
          Quote: NEXUS
          First-class ships with 40 years in service

          And you are again enchanting. COURTS of the first rank!
          No, I can’t with you))))))))))))))))))))
    3. Alex_59
      Alex_59 30 November 2017 15: 46
      +1
      Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
      Clear. So the aircraft carriers are not going to build even in the distant future. Sadly

      Purely by logic, I would like to have an “aircraft carrier” construction in Severodvinsk. Why? Spacious. They are able to work with large size. They know how to work with the atom.
      But this is in theory, because they are not really going to build them.
    4. Bronevick
      Bronevick 30 November 2017 16: 39
      +1
      If they will build, then on the Gulf in the Crimea.
      1. Overlock
        Overlock 30 November 2017 17: 48
        +4
        Zaliv Plant, on April 9, 1974, the Crimean supertanker was launched: tanker length - 295 m, width - 45 m, side height - 25,4 m, draft - 17 m, displacement - 180 thousand tons, deadweight - 150 500 t, carrying capacity - 143 250 t
      2. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
        Andrei from Chelyabinsk 30 November 2017 19: 05
        +2
        Quote: Bronevick
        If they will build, then on the Gulf in the Crimea.

        They won’t be in Crimea for sure, there’s a shipbuilding in the blockage
        1. cyberspace
          cyberspace 1 December 2017 13: 18
          +1
          Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
          They won’t be in Crimea for sure, there’s a shipbuilding in the blockage

          There the question is not only in the blockage of shipbuilding. According to the Montreux Convention, an aircraft carrier cannot pass the Turkish straits. That is, two options remain - Murmansk / Severodvinsk / Roslyakovo and the Far East. The North will be engaged in the construction and repair of nuclear submarines and cruisers, including Nakhimov and Kuznetsov. The shipyard is not yet ready for Far East, after putting it into operation, a number of hulls for the civilian fleet (supertankers, container carriers, gas carriers) will first be built to develop technologies and develop experience by personnel, and only then they will begin to work on aircraft carriers.
    5. d ^ Amir
      d ^ Amir 30 November 2017 17: 47
      0
      Well, so "Severnaya Verf" ... Good evening !!!! it’s St. Petersburg .... they never built aircraft carriers here ... this thing as an aircraft carrier if in our realities where to build it so in Murmansk .... well, in that direction in general ...
      1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
        Andrei from Chelyabinsk 30 November 2017 19: 06
        +2
        Quote: d ^ Amir
        Well, so "Severnaya Verf" ... Good evening !!!! Well this is St. Petersburg ....

        Good evening! :))) In principle, yes, but there’s silence about Sevmash, but he won’t build AB on his
        1. d ^ Amir
          d ^ Amir 30 November 2017 19: 37
          0
          Well, that means all hope for the Far East and Crimea ...
  3. san4es
    san4es 30 November 2017 15: 43
    +9
    ... "North Shipyard". Excursion.
    March 2016
  4. poplar in Kiev
    poplar in Kiev 30 November 2017 15: 52
    +6
    Many times I was at this enterprise. Since 2000, it supplied there titanium and stainless steel. Moreover, not to the plant itself, but to outbid firms that occupied everything there. These firms rented offices and warehouses on the territory of the enterprise. What was there: the metal was resold and the fish salting shop and the old electrodes were repackaged and imported labels were glued onto our fire extinguishers and sold as foreign ones.
    The last time was there already in 2011. maybe something has changed there. But I remember well the worn-out equipment, ancient workshops ..
    1. The comment was deleted.
  5. 1Leningrad
    1Leningrad 30 November 2017 19: 31
    +1
    We have a lot of bright head-gold hands run out.
  6. Fedya2017
    Fedya2017 30 November 2017 21: 58
    +3
    A nuclear-powered destroyer is not needed. It is good of course to have an unlimited range ... But for how many days will there be a supply of food, for example? Not having naval bases throughout the oceans. like amers, every supply destroyer will have to carry supply ships, floating workshops, etc. The Americans at one time built atomic cruisers, but even for them it was expensive and not rational, so they were cut into scrap metal and bet on AUG. And we all want to "invent a bicycle" ...