Military Review

The transfer of "Ivan Khurs" fleet moved to 1 quarter 2018 year

22
The reconnaissance ship Ivan Hurs, being built at the Severnaya Verf shipyard, will be handed over to the Naval the fleet Russia in the first quarter of 2018, said Deputy Defense Minister Yuri Borisov when visiting the Severnaya Verf


As for the reconnaissance ship "Ivan Khurs", this year’s program, unfortunately, apparently cannot be completed.
We hope that at the beginning of December the ship will go to factory tests, and the final acceptance of the ship will be in the first quarter of next year.
- he said.

The transfer of "Ivan Khurs" fleet moved to 1 quarter 2018 year


Earlier, the Defense Ministry reported plans to take "Ivan Khurs" into the Navy in November of this year.

The second ship of the 18280 project was laid in the fall of 2013. It was named in honor of Vice Admiral Ivan Khurs, who made an outstanding contribution to the creation and development of the permanent intelligence of the Navy. The solemn ceremony of launching the vessel took place on 16 this May.

18280 ships are designed to provide communications, fleet management, and radio intelligence. Their displacement is about four thousand tons, the speed reaches 20 knots, cruising range is 8 thousand miles, the crew of the vessel consists of 120 people. The lead ship of the project "Yuri Ivanov", pledged in 2004, was transferred to the Northern Fleet in 2015.
Photos used:
Press Service of the shipyard "Severnaya Verf"
22 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 30 November 2017 11: 08 New
    +1
    Something often began to come news about the postponement of the delivery of finished products for the army and navy. It's not really nice to hear that. In this case, the truth is for 2-3 months.
    1. ImPerts
      ImPerts 30 November 2017 13: 23 New
      0
      The newest American aircraft carrier Gerald Ford originally promised to turn in at 2014, and surrendered to 2017. As far as I know, there are still problems there. Price increased from 5,1 billion to 12,9.
      The new British aircraft carrier promised to turn in 2013 or 2014, surrendered to 2017. I definitely won’t write about the price, but it has increased.
      What is there to say about us?
  2. Chertt
    Chertt 30 November 2017 11: 10 New
    +1
    They wrote about the contract for four ships of project 18280. I hope nothing has changed
  3. creak
    creak 30 November 2017 11: 10 New
    +4
    Deputy the minister hopes, that the ship will be included in the fleet in the 1st quarter of 2018
    The answer is a worthy deputy.MO - instead of the deadlines for the delivery of the ship - hope ...
    Do not be sad
    Whole life ahead
    Hope and wait... fellow
    Some kind of circus tent, only it becomes not funny, but sad when there are such clowns in the arena ....
    1. Serg65
      Serg65 30 November 2017 11: 16 New
      +6
      Quote: ranger
      instead of the deadlines for delivery of the ship - hope

      laughing Well, yes, in Soviet times it would have been kicked out of the factory on New Year’s’s, reported, received a prize, and then completed the whole year ... and with grandmas, and the ship in service bully . And now the military do not care for the factory workers to cry, did it, get it, didn’t do it!
      1. Alexey RA
        Alexey RA 30 November 2017 11: 47 New
        +3
        Quote: Serg65
        Well, yes, in Soviet times it would have been kicked out of the factory on New Year’s’s, reported, received a prize, and then completed the whole year ... and with grandmas, and the ship in service

        Or they would have closed all the documents by December, and the work would have continued in the new year. And it would go - December 30, December 31, December 32, December 33, December 34 ... smile
        I remember that the leader of the Leningrad under Joseph Vissarionovich officially handed over to the fleet on December 5, 1936. And it was only possible to tear it from the factory outfitting wall in July 1938.
        1. Serg65
          Serg65 30 November 2017 11: 51 New
          +3
          hi Приветствуем!
          Quote: Alexey RA
          I remember the leader of Leningrad

          laughing 50% of Soviet ships passed such an epic, and if the director of the shipyard seduced with an awl and a bathhouse, a member of the Central Committee threatened to put it back to where it got out crying
      2. faiver
        faiver 30 November 2017 12: 39 New
        0
        Yes, where does the Soviet time? we have the Austrians built a medical center (quite a while already) so opened it with cutting the ribbon when only the first floor was ready laughing
        his second stage (nursery) was opened in the same way - but this is in 90
        in 2000 they also opened a children's clinic - Gref cut the ribbon laughing
        1. Serg65
          Serg65 30 November 2017 12: 48 New
          +3
          Quote: faiver
          Yes, where does the Soviet time?

          what Well, how, in the last 50 years, ships and ships in Russia were built either in Soviet times. or in the last 10 years, so I compare with what is bully
        2. Alexey RA
          Alexey RA 30 November 2017 17: 33 New
          +1
          Quote: faiver
          Yes, where does the Soviet time? we have the Austrians built a medical center (quite a while already) so opened it with cutting the ribbon when only the first floor was ready

          Hehe hehe .. for some reason I immediately remembered the Willy Brandt Berlin-Brandenburg Airport. smile
    2. DenZ
      DenZ 30 November 2017 11: 38 New
      +1
      Quote: ranger
      Some kind of circus tent, only it becomes not funny, but sad when there are such clowns in the arena ....

      Well, if it remains to state only hopes, this does not mean at all that the top is at the top. All sorts of contractors and subcontractors can also make a big deal with terms that are a consequence of a more likely market economy (as opposed to planned) and a general decline in production in the 90s and zero.
      1. creak
        creak 30 November 2017 11: 52 New
        +1
        Quote: DenZ
        there is a consequence rather of a market economy (as opposed to planned)

        In countries with exclusively market economies, are these ships being built at a pace that we have never dreamed of, name some or guess what? And for some reason we ordered a series of new supertankers in South Korea with its market economy, and not in the DPRK where the economy is exclusively planned. And for some reason, the DPRK receives humanitarian aid from South Korea, and not vice versa ...
        Because with such a planned economy in a couple of years in the Sahara desert, even the sand would end ....
        And the starting conditions for both countries after WWII were the same - poverty and devastation ....
        And if what we have in the economy is a market, then what is a bazaar?
  4. Neputin
    Neputin 30 November 2017 11: 22 New
    +2
    The show in military shipbuilding with the postponement of the delivery of ships continues. Shou must go on ...
  5. tlauicol
    tlauicol 30 November 2017 11: 29 New
    +2
    Gorshkov next in line for the transfer?
    1. Stirbjorn
      Stirbjorn 30 November 2017 11: 41 New
      +1
      yes there is a big choice - still Gren, Makarov, Elbrus
    2. next322
      next322 30 November 2017 11: 42 New
      +3
      in the company of Makarov, Vasily Bykov and Gren ........
  6. x.andvlad
    x.andvlad 30 November 2017 11: 55 New
    0
    I would like to know the specific reasons for the postponement of change, but they, unfortunately, are not called.
    1. Piramidon
      Piramidon 30 November 2017 13: 15 New
      0
      Quote: x.andvlad
      I would like to know the specific reasons for the postponement of change, but they, unfortunately, are not called.

      Well, would you know and what would change? Just curiosity? The people here would have filled up with angry comments, and the construction of this would not have accelerated. Whoever needs it knows.
  7. Vlad5307
    Vlad5307 30 November 2017 12: 51 New
    +2
    Yes, however, long-term construction on the Navy’s side is already, as our government likes to say, an obvious trend. Something is amiss in our USC, can administrative managers somehow overtake effective managers? Spend their money effectively. they cannot build as efficiently as well! soldier
  8. Stasweb
    Stasweb 30 November 2017 13: 02 New
    +1
    Quote: Neputin
    The show in military shipbuilding with the postponement of the delivery of ships continues. Shou must go on ...

    Your English "let us down" (.
    1. Neputin
      Neputin 30 November 2017 19: 40 New
      +1
      Regarding the news, do you have something to say ?, a troll? (about the show - I agree, a mistake, in a hurry)
      1. Stasweb
        Stasweb 6 March 2018 13: 53 New
        0
        When there is nothing to answer, diarrhea is used))