Lavrov called the conditions for the introduction of UN peacekeepers in the Donbass

59
The UN contingent will be introduced into the Donbass after diluting the forces and assets of the parties, but this should be coordinated with Kiev, Donetsk and Lugansk, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said in an interview with the Italian newspaper Libero.

The minister recalled that at a press conference following the BRICS summit in China in September, President Vladimir Putin put forward the initiative to establish a UN mission to assist in the protection of the OSCE SMM in south-eastern Ukraine.



Lavrov called the conditions for the introduction of UN peacekeepers in the Donbass


The essence of the proposal is that the UN forces should ensure only the security of OSCE SMM monitors who will be deployed in the breeding area on both sides of the contact line, as well as when patrolling other conflict areas in accordance with their mandate to implement the Minsk agreements. The UN contingent will be introduced into the conflict zone after the withdrawal of the forces and means of the parties. The deployment of UN officers should be agreed with the authorities in Kiev, and in Donetsk and Lugansk
- he declared.

At the same time, the Minsk agreements continue to be the basis of the settlement, all existing negotiation platforms remain - the Minsk Contact Group and the "Norman format"
- added Lavrov.

In addition, Lavrov said that the Crimea will remain a part of Russia, this topic is closed once and for all.

According to him, it became obvious that thanks to the referendum and the subsequent reunification of the Crimea with Russia, the inhabitants of the peninsula avoided the horrors of the civil war - "that for more than three years, the Kiev authorities were doing in the Donbass", reports RIA News
  • © RIA News / Maxim Blinov
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

59 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    30 November 2017 10: 39
    Lavrov is already carrying something wrong. What is the contingent of the UN? The United States at one stroke organizes an occupying army, just give them the appropriate resolution.
    1. +12
      30 November 2017 10: 43
      Lavrov once again voiced the proposal of the president.
      UN forces should ensure exclusively the safety of OSCE SMM observers
      In this case, the United States, with all their efforts, does not organize the "occupying army". Therefore, Americans are opposed to such a proposal.
      1. +5
        30 November 2017 11: 04
        Quote: rotmistr60
        Therefore, Americans are opposed to such a proposal.


        Hi Gennady.
        And what does the Americans have to do with the settlement process in the southeast of the former Ukraine? In the same way, they are not tied to Minsk and the Norman format in any way. None of these UN-approved documents mention the United States. But with the connivance of the Kiev junta, US army structures quietly (as always) climbed into the "404" territory and began to dictate their own rules. So, in principle, we have the right of the guarantor of the Minsk agreements to send America with its "Wishlist" to the "macaque" (long with two balls). stop
        Interesting: the destroyer James Williams could not enter the port of Odessa because of the foam and the Chanel amber. bully
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. +2
          30 November 2017 11: 14
          Greetings Leo! hi Do not forget that the United States at the UN plays almost the first violin.
          destroyer "James Williams" could not enter the port of Odessa because of the foam and amber "chanel"
          Probably the crews "learned" from the "best" Navy of the world on constant exercises and did not see the coast from fatigue.
          1. +1
            30 November 2017 11: 36
            Quote: rotmistr60
            Do not forget that the United States at the UN plays almost the first violin.


            Good afternoon, Gennady. This is one of the “bugs” that we constantly run into, the next one is that our European “Minsk colleagues” have gone headlong into their regional problems and stopped working practically in Ukraine, with the exception of rebukes against Russia. "Handsome" Macron does not move away from the mirror and microphone, and old Merkel does not repair her chancellor's throne. Well, Trump puffing out his cheeks is trying to take their place in Reshalov with (as always) muscle playing. In Ukraine itself rats are rustling and getting ready on 3.12 to raid Kukuevgrad.
            1. +2
              30 November 2017 11: 53
              "Handsome" Macron does not move away from the mirror and microphone, and old Merkel does not repair her chancellor's throne.
              Briefly, but aptly described the situation with countries guarantors. Let's see how events will develop further.
          2. +2
            30 November 2017 13: 06
            Foam embarrassed? In vain, it’s the ukropatriots who pissed with happiness - the host bark came up, brought the beads ...
        3. +1
          30 November 2017 20: 17
          Normal network nonsense.

          the destroyer type "Arly Burke" stood at the berth 16 of the Sea Terminal. Mooring operations were completed by 9:45.

          "clear traces of foam"
          In the Gulf of Odessa, foaming for other reasons occurs. It does not affect shipping
          1. 0
            1 December 2017 17: 21
            Here is another reason for the collapse of "nenko"
    2. +2
      30 November 2017 10: 44
      It is unlikely that they will go to such conditions ... One breeding of the parties to them like a sickle ...
      1. +14
        30 November 2017 10: 48
        They will simply send in their troops without resolution! As We have already observed more than once.
        1. +3
          30 November 2017 11: 04
          Quote: Anarchist
          They will simply send in their troops without resolution! As We have already observed more than once.

          Watched Yes when it was "somewhere" ...
          In the event of further such "observation", us on head shit, and youspecifically under the door..
          1. +13
            30 November 2017 11: 23
            Quote: Separ DNR
            Watched when it was "somewhere."

            Yugoslavia is a brotherly state!
            And about, specifically, my door:
            Unfortunately, I do not decide anything! The Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs have their own plan in this regard - “Putin’s cunning plan”! Which strictly adheres to the Minsk Conspiracy!
            1. +3
              30 November 2017 11: 38
              Quote: Anarchist
              And about, specifically, my door:
              Unfortunately, I do not decide anything! The Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs have their own plan in this regard - “Putin’s cunning plan”! Which strictly adheres to the Minsk Conspiracy!

              Okay... Yes We call this "door" conditionally "all-Russian" ...

              Quote: Anarchist
              Yugoslavia is a brotherly state!


              Yet, then still , not within walking distance. And now, we and you are specifically "backed up".

              What is called: "There is nowhere to retreat, behind Moscow", and "For Miusthere is no land for us "
            2. +2
              30 November 2017 11: 45
              Quote: Anarchist
              Which strictly adheres to the Minsk Conspiracy!


              hi , Alexander.
              This is the only joint package of agreements with Europe approved by the UN and sealed by the UN Security Council seal, which to some extent binds the hands of the United States, NATO and the Kiev junta to build a bonfire that develops into World War III.
              1. +13
                30 November 2017 12: 37
                My friend, once again remind about Yugoslavia, Iraq? These are the countries that the US invaded in defiance of a UN resolution!
                It has long been clear that they do not care about the UN! They resort to this tool only to jury us!
                1. +2
                  30 November 2017 12: 48
                  Quote: Anarchist
                  My friend, once again remind about Yugoslavia, Iraq? These are the countries that the US invaded in defiance of a UN resolution!


                  Yes it is, but .... But this was a time when Russia was weakened by the efforts of our nat. the traitors were largely dependent on the US and the EU. Now the situation is different. America recognizes only the right of power, and we have shown them our capabilities (not all, of course). Ukraine is a zone of our strategic interests and there is nothing for the Yankees to do there. It is good if they understand this and accept it for execution, but if not, then they are worse off. This was made clear to Washington through Walker.
                  1. +9
                    30 November 2017 12: 59
                    Look at Syria, there we hold them back by force! The war is over!
                    What prevents to do the same in the Donbass? - `` Minsk conspiracy ''!
        2. 0
          1 December 2017 17: 22
          No, they will not introduce! The Russians have a terrible weapon - a mirror !!! tongue
      2. +5
        30 November 2017 10: 48
        The UN contingent will be introduced into the Donbass after diluting the forces and assets of the parties, but this should be coordinated with Kiev, Donetsk and Lugansk, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said in an interview with the Italian newspaper Libero.

        I agree ! Yes Bred Yes . Dill "in the historical homeland", and us ... But us, where to put it?

        And nowhere, we are already at home ...
      3. +1
        30 November 2017 10: 49
        Lavrov called the conditions for the introduction of UN peacekeepers in the Donbass
    3. 0
      30 November 2017 11: 00
      So under the auspices of the UN our military personnel can be.
      1. +2
        30 November 2017 14: 12
        Quote: Resident of the Urals
        So under the auspices of the UN our military personnel can be.

        It is better if under the auspices of the UN and the Red Cross there will be dill prisoners of war.
    4. +1
      30 November 2017 11: 27
      Quote: Altona
      Lavrov is already carrying something wrong. What is the contingent of the UN? The United States at one stroke organizes an occupying army, just give them the appropriate resolution.

      Lavrov calmly puts forward obviously unattainable requirements for Kiev.
    5. 0
      30 November 2017 12: 01
      Quote: Altona
      Lavrov is already carrying something wrong. What is the contingent of the UN? The United States at one stroke organizes an occupying army, just give them the appropriate resolution.

      If, as Lavrov says, first the troops are withdrawn more than a shot, they are agreed with LDNR, the UN is introduced, the idea is to get a wide security zone, automatic firing will stop. Another question is how to exclude the situation of leakage of ukrov through UN members.
      1. 0
        30 November 2017 12: 28
        And the UN should be “right” - those who don’t run after cookies to the White House and American embassies.
      2. 0
        1 December 2017 17: 26
        They will leak out, then send everyone to filter to heaven.
  2. +5
    30 November 2017 10: 44
    Lavrov said that Crimea will remain part of Russia, this topic is closed once and for all.

    Lavrov put an end to the issue of Crimea hi
    1. +6
      30 November 2017 10: 50
      Quote: pvv113
      Lavrov put an end to the issue of Crimea

      who just didn’t put this “point”, what is the use?
      1. +4
        30 November 2017 10: 54
        They will continue to stink about Crimea, although EVERYONE understands that Crimea is Russia!
        1. +3
          30 November 2017 11: 52
          So after all, inside Russia, all sorts of liberoids Yavlinsky, Sobchak, etc.
          1. +4
            30 November 2017 11: 54
            So all stinking from one source are paid. wink
            1. +3
              30 November 2017 12: 30
              And they say "money does not smell", it turns out how they smell!
              1. +5
                30 November 2017 12: 34
                Those for whom money does not smell have a runny nose. lol
                1. +3
                  30 November 2017 12: 35
                  That's it - pathological wink
                  1. +5
                    30 November 2017 12: 38
                    Oh, and even with a fatal outcome ... feel
                    1. +2
                      30 November 2017 14: 43
                      They are tenacious, their dust crying
                      1. +4
                        30 November 2017 14: 45
                        To be sure, you can also add arsenic ... feel
        2. +2
          30 November 2017 11: 53
          Quote: Jedi
          They will continue to stink about Crimea


          And what can they do? They will stink, cry and do dirty tricks. And banderlog and "Europe" without this simply can not live. Yes
          1. +5
            30 November 2017 12: 34
            Quote: Lelek
            And banderlog and "Europe" without this simply can not live.

            And then they pay for it. Why not let the "mute"? lol
      2. +4
        30 November 2017 10: 56
        Nevertheless, the position in the Crimea is unchanged. And then there were already all-scouts with the theme of the drain of Crimea
    2. +1
      30 November 2017 10: 52
      the point was put by the inhabitants of Russia and the Crimea, not the Kalantars.
    3. +4
      30 November 2017 11: 17
      Quote: pvv113
      Lavrov put an end to the issue of Crimea


      hi Vladimir.
      By the way, what's new in Crimea?
      Firstly, the debts of Crimeans to the banks of the former Ukraine were written off (and this is gut):

      Secondly, they began to restore the Crimean telescope (and this is also a source):

      So that quietly-quiet Crimea is put in order.
      1. +4
        30 November 2017 11: 53
        Leo, welcome! Yes, one Crimean bridge is worth it!
        1. +3
          30 November 2017 12: 00
          Quote: pvv113
          Yes, one Crimean bridge is worth


          This is so, but I mentioned the latter (this is against the background of "Ukrainian-quack-quack-krya media", which trumpet hunger, repression, the Department of Tatars and the dominance of Yakuts in Crimea).
          1. +4
            30 November 2017 12: 30
            Let them whine - it's envy
  3. +1
    30 November 2017 10: 52
    Lavrov did not put a period, but a comma. Crimea, of course, is ours, but everything can change. And suddenly Ksyushad will nevertheless pass an allure in the elections? And about the UN contingent, our guarantor, although not 7 spans in the forehead, but clearly does not give reason to doubt the competence of many international issues.
  4. +3
    30 November 2017 10: 52
    "The UN contingent will be introduced into the conflict zone after the separation of forces and means of the parties ......

    It is worth getting there as a UN contingent of the Yankees, the British, Germans or French - how this "contingent" will disperse throughout the territory of the LDP and begin to perform police-occupying functions ... And, consider that the whole business of the republics will be ruined, and the sacrifices made will be in vain ...
    You can’t let anyone in there ...
  5. +1
    30 November 2017 10: 55
    Correctly. It is necessary to push through our solution to this issue.
  6. +1
    30 November 2017 10: 57
    The question remained the question of where the UN peacekeepers will be deployed (territorially) and the composition of the mission ...
  7. +2
    30 November 2017 11: 07
    Russia is the guarantor of what? So they killed and there was nothing for it? The Minsk agreements have not been fulfilled for a day, and Lavrov should conduct all negotiations! And I have a question for Lavrov. What should Bendera do in order for Russia to use force on this lawlessness?
  8. +1
    30 November 2017 11: 15
    the UN contingent is worse than just an OSCE mission.
    worse by the illusion of security and an incredibly expanding field for provocations by the kaklohunta and kaklovodov.
    and there are plenty of provocations there.

    threw a dozen mines in the location of some UN unit, soaked the guards from Vanuatu or some Pakistan ... and it's in the hat
  9. 0
    30 November 2017 11: 16
    If the US Army dare to appear on the border with the DNI and LC, then there will be a real reason to introduce a specific return! In the meantime, the topic from the category - if you throw a brick, will the moon fall?
  10. 0
    30 November 2017 11: 22
    Finns, by the way, love to go to the UN contingents, it’s a direct profession like that among the Finnish military
    I scored six months of service in the United Nations — you can import any car to your home country duty free.
  11. +1
    30 November 2017 15: 00
    Jedi,
    It is a pity that there is no such law to be responsible for the hatred of the motherland
  12. 0
    30 November 2017 15: 26
    According to him, it became obvious that thanks to the referendum and the subsequent reunification of Crimea with Russia, the inhabitants of the peninsula escaped the horrors of the civil war.

    Which, in the Donbass, was arranged by Russia.
    1. 0
      30 November 2017 17: 42
      ... uncle, you ... fool
  13. +4
    30 November 2017 17: 06
    Lavrov says everything correctly.
    "The deployment of the United Nations should be agreed with the authorities both in Kiev, and in Donetsk and Lugansk."
    Strictly by law. And now I will look at the evil farting from Ukraine and the USA, since we must allow them to come here.
  14. +1
    30 November 2017 17: 46
    Anglo-Saxons and EU figures do not need to be trusted. They are all in their own interests and benefits. Without benefit for themselves, they will not do anything. Deceive as always. How many times have they done this.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"