Military Review

The first echelons with the complex "BUK-М2"

32
The first trains with anti-aircraft missile units and new Buk-M2 anti-aircraft missile systems arrived in Buryatia at the unloading station of the city of Ulan-Ude, reports press office Eastern District.


The first echelons with the complex "BUK-М2"


In addition to the Buk-М2 air defense system, the anti-aircraft missile compound was supplemented with the latest launch-charging installations (ROM), radar stations and the Polyana control complex,
says release.

The press service clarified that "this year, the military personnel of the unit underwent retraining at a specialized training center for the air defense forces in the Orenburg region, where they received the latest anti-aircraft missile systems."

After completing the training, the rocket men successfully completed docking combat shooting.

"Buk-M2" is a highly mobile modern anti-aircraft missile system equipped with missiles with an efficiency of hitting aircraft up to 99%. These complexes allow to ensure the defeat of tactical ballistic and aviation rockets.
Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Tektor
    Tektor 28 November 2017 15: 26 New
    +6
    It is Buk-M2, as the best quality / price ratio, and is needed now in the Far East. Its radius of the zone of destruction by low flying targets is about 40 km due to the target illumination station raised to a height of 22 m.
    1. Burbon
      Burbon 28 November 2017 15: 29 New
      +3
      Quote: Tektor
      It is Buk-M2, as the best quality / price ratio

      and with what did you compare to come to this conclusion?
      1. Tektor
        Tektor 28 November 2017 15: 34 New
        +5
        Here, I simply refer to the opinion of Sivkov, who referred to the presence of a high backlight station, providing leveling of the terrain up to 20 m.
        1. just exp
          just exp 28 November 2017 16: 16 New
          +1
          You won’t show in the photo where the Buk SDA has a “target illumination station raised to a height of 22 m.” ?
          otherwise it seems to me that you have confused Buk with S-300.
          1. sivuch
            sivuch 28 November 2017 16: 58 New
            +3
            http://rbase.new-factoria.ru/missile/wobb/buk-2m/
            buk-2m.shtml
            There are pictures
            1. just exp
              just exp 28 November 2017 17: 35 New
              +1
              I wrote about the SOU. they do not always function as part of a battery.
      2. Kasym
        Kasym 28 November 2017 15: 34 New
        +4
        In my humble opinion, Buki will replace the V-Knight S-350. They promised to conduct all tests before the end of the year. The rocket was ready in the summer. She will also go to the naval version of Poliment-Redut. hi
        1. Sergey53
          Sergey53 28 November 2017 15: 45 New
          +5
          It reads in two ways: “Beeches will replace S-350”. I went nuts first.
          1. Kasym
            Kasym 28 November 2017 15: 53 New
            +6
            It happens, I apologize. S-350 Vityaz will replace Bukam. As I understand it, the range of the S-350 was raised to 120 km .. And this is almost S-300 of earlier versions. And the ammunition is large, on one launcher 12 rockets at once. hi
            1. Sergey53
              Sergey53 28 November 2017 16: 19 New
              +1
              Respect sir.
        2. just exp
          just exp 28 November 2017 16: 17 New
          +4
          S-350 replaces S-300P * older versions.
          and over time, in general, all S-300P *.
          and they cannot replace beeches from a word in general, since Buk is military air defense, and Vityaz is object-based.
          1. Kasym
            Kasym 28 November 2017 16: 40 New
            +2
            Countries like mine are not up to fat. Even wealthy CAs cannot afford to deploy layered air defense. Otherwise, not only the S-400 would be bought. Surely, specialists from Almaz-Antei told the Saudis about this.
            Honestly, now is not up to the comments. Read more. In Kazakhstan, the VO site was covered up. After all warned admins. And my special. said that I have access for a week only. And then there is Polit. The review has opened - it has long been covered. A lot of "chernukha" about the republic - that’s closed, but the ANC works for us. These people will not miss such a thing, they can easily kindle the interethnic. Attribute the relationship and demand to close. It became tough with this. Although there may be other reasons, I don’t know. But the fact that there is no access to the Military Review in Kazakhstan. hi
            1. just exp
              just exp 28 November 2017 17: 35 New
              +1
              S-400 was bought not because there were not enough patriots, it was a purely political purchase.
    2. siberalt
      siberalt 28 November 2017 16: 16 New
      0
      Now, “Boeing” over Buryatia is better not to fly! belay
    3. sivuch
      sivuch 28 November 2017 16: 47 New
      +3
      And why not M3 then?
  2. Svarozhich
    Svarozhich 28 November 2017 15: 37 New
    +1
    Oh! Such would be on the Syrian border with Israel and Lebanon!
    1. Herculesic
      Herculesic 28 November 2017 16: 10 New
      +1
      The Israelis will "prove" to you that they can easily defend any air defense system, and even the missile defense system will easily deceive or destroy! Even the one that now exists only in the drawings! wassat
      1. Viktorfi
        Viktorfi 28 November 2017 16: 54 New
        0
        Quote: Herkulesich
        The Israelis will “prove” to you that they can easily defend any anti-aircraft defense system, and even the anti-missile defense system,


        To put on the border?
        AGM-142 Have Nap and no Beech crying
        And given that not far from the border, it’s also easy to take it off the ground ..
        It is possible and shock drones ...
        1. just exp
          just exp 28 November 2017 17: 36 New
          +1
          why, the AGM-142 Have Nap has become invulnerable and cannot be brought down?
          ours and Kharmas can bring down.
          in Syria the problem is not beech, it is in Arabs.
          1. Viktorfi
            Viktorfi 28 November 2017 18: 00 New
            0
            Quote: just explo
            why, the AGM-142 Have Nap has become invulnerable and cannot be brought down?


            Try to knock down good


            Quote: just explo
            in Syria the problem is not beech, it is in Arabs.


            There is no real strong air defense in Syria. Even having planted for everything that they have Russian advisers, the air defense will also be taken out, because simply the level is not the same air defense in quantity.

            Moreover, Damascus is close, if Israel has tracking satellites that immediately detect attempts to deploy the systems, bring in equipment, etc., an advanced electronic warfare system, shock drones, aircraft, and the proximity of Syria, which allows striking tens of kilometers from the ground, then Syria will quickly raise the handles up.
            1. just exp
              just exp 28 November 2017 21: 39 New
              +1
              Try to knock down

              why try there, Thor even knocks Saman down.
              There is no real strong air defense in Syria. Even having planted for everything that they have Russian advisers, the air defense will also be taken out, because simply the level is not the same air defense in quantity.

              Duc air defense is not one, missiles can cover your airfields. then there will be no one to destroy the air defense.
    2. just exp
      just exp 28 November 2017 16: 18 New
      +1
      and that will be ?
      we have S-300V (emnip4) there, it is much higher in class.
      and give the Arabs, so give them what they want, there will be no sense.
    3. alexmach
      alexmach 28 November 2017 16: 20 New
      +1
      You will not believe it, but the Syrians have such complexes. Delivered in 2011.
  3. just exp
    just exp 28 November 2017 16: 19 New
    +1
    and where is the news on the M3?
    1. Vlad.by
      Vlad.by 29 November 2017 13: 27 New
      0
      This is just the question. Why is a new brigade being put up with M2 when the M3 is already in service and supply with new missiles in the container and new radars
  4. Eurodav
    Eurodav 28 November 2017 17: 03 New
    0
    Look Herculesych, one of the Jews under the nickname Viktorfi already paid you !!! That's what intragenic bragging means !:
    "... to put on the border?
    AGM-142 Have Nap and no Buka crying
    And given that not far from the border, it’s also easy to take it off the ground ..
    It’s possible with shock drones ... "
    How do you answer a lover of stuffed pike?
    1. Herculesic
      Herculesic 28 November 2017 17: 17 New
      +2
      I'll climb under the table lol spawn beluga wassat ! What should they answer? Let people think that they really have an omnipotent technique - the truth, it will be worse for them when life refutes their statements!
      1. Viktorfi
        Viktorfi 28 November 2017 17: 23 New
        +1
        Quote: Herkulesich
        Let people think that they really have an omnipotent technique - the truth, it will hurt them,


        No one says that technology is omnipotent, just such systems are usually located inside a multilayer system, and not around the perimeter, and even more so near the borders, where it is easy to remove from the ground and from the air.
        1. dvvv
          dvvv 28 November 2017 23: 23 New
          +1
          strange Jews people, boast of all of their own and are proud of themselves. Any fool knows that it is impossible to defeat on the defensive and if you put the best complex and even several, you can still destroy them. It’s just that if it’s not the poor Arabs who bring weapons to themselves through holes, but the real army, then having attacked the enemy’s air defense systems, you will immediately receive an answer to your attack systems that you will cover with your air defense systems. Otherwise, any complex, even yours, even Amer’s, even Russian, can be destroyed. How many times have I written that in the distant Soviet times we had a map of the defended territory on which NATO airfields were marked and weapons were indicated and how many and what kind of NATO planes and missiles were required to break through air defense and
          how much to destroy in the nuclear and non-nuclear version. And to all of us who served in air defense everything was clear and understandable at the age of 18-20, and you Jews, it seems, are not children, but you carry such garbage.
  5. Kent0001
    Kent0001 28 November 2017 23: 22 New
    +1
    More Buk good and different ... and more S-400, 500 and much more. Such news is only encouraging.
    1. Lycan
      Lycan 29 November 2017 12: 38 New
      0
      For example, S-100500!
      At the touch of a button:
      - Changes the political situation in the world with the change of state. leaders;
      - controls the movement of continents;
      - changes their position underwater / surface;
      - governs the nature of climate change at both poles, coordinating the long-term weather character with the orders of individual states;
      - indexes pensions / scholarships / increase by veteran status / effectively suppresses corruption intentions in the public sector.
  6. dvvv
    dvvv 28 November 2017 23: 47 New
    +1
    Already in the 20th century, and now even more so, no one was interested in these air defense systems, if you fight seriously. Our air defense brigade and regiment of interceptors covered the industrial region of Zaporozhye - Melitopol, and on the map it was written that the main covered objects were the industry of these cities, power plants and hydroelectric power stations. How the Americans carried the caponiers of the Syrians with broken planes inside, while they themselves warned the Russians about the impending attack and it is clear that the Russians told the Syrians about this so that the serviceable planes would grow corners, which can not be said about the caponiers. It was an act of intimidation, a demonstration of opportunities, in a similar way Russia does when it shoots Caliber at the mythical headquarters of ISIS and workshops producing jihadomobiles. They test their capabilities and demonstrate to the enemy to respect. The real answer to Israel, if you respond to the attack, will be a blow to vital facilities like the Americans did in Yugoslavia. It costs 10-20 gauges to spread 10 junction electrical substations in large cities, as the Israeli disaster begins and everything plunges into darkness for a long time. The kondeys will be disconnected and all that is frozen, as well as electric cars. This is a run-in method of waging war with a civilized state, which is lowered to the level of the Middle Ages. This technique doesn’t work at all in Afghanistan ... the Middle Ages are already there, but for pampered Israel, especially in the summer in the heat ... the kapets will be right away. In short, the best air defense systems without Caliber are useless.