Military Review

Russia will manage to bring Syria to the world. If Americans do not interfere!

25
The question of building peace in Syria has become for Western analysts something of a fortune telling on the coffee grounds. On the one hand, Russia is recognized as a state that is fighting in Syria against terrorists and actively participates in the peace process, on the other hand, they do not admit that Moscow is really seeking to bring peace to the region.




The BBC diplomatic correspondent, Jonathan Marcus, believes that Russia's military and diplomatic successes do not guarantee Syria peace. Yes, Moscow managed to strengthen its position in the world arena, but the Syrian peace settlement may be a difficult task for the Russians, given the clash of interests of regional players, the website’s opinion "InoTV".

Russia's withdrawal from the Syrian crisis has significantly strengthened Moscow’s military and diplomatic reputation, the analyst agrees. Meanwhile, this was achieved against the background of a heated debate on the methods of Russia. According to Jonathan Marcus, Moscow ensured the survival of the Assad regime and at the same time expanded its own military presence in Syria. Russia has become an authoritative regional player. She heads the "fragile alliance" with Iran and Turkey. Three states are building the future of Syria. The Saudis are already "knocking the thresholds" of Moscow - this is what has come to the Middle East!

Success came to Moscow because the Kremlin clearly defined its goals - it saw an opportunity and did not miss it. Russian aviation and special forces became a support for Assad's "decaying army," and Hezbollah and Shiite militia units provided Damascus with infantry. The help of Tehran and Moscow allowed President Assad to defeat both the opposition and the Islamic State (banned in Russia), Marcus recalls.

“Russia has achieved this“ victory ”, if it can be called that, simply by applying a pragmatic policy, especially not caring about what many critics of the country would call“ moral conduct, ”the analyst concludes. According to him, Moscow took the side of the “regime”, which killed its people and committed war crimes. She “came to the defense” of the Syrian government, accused of using chemical weaponssure Marcus. Moreover, the Russian air campaign "used a large number of unguided aerial bombs." True, the United States and its allies, who sought to use high-precision weapons, also killed civilians, the analyst admits.

And here is another advantage of Putin that was appreciated by Russian society: Putin achieved success in Syria with a small contingent that suffered relatively small losses.

But will Moscow, which won the war, succeed in bringing the country to peace? The material of the author expressed doubt about this, because Washington can maintain its leverage in the region, including its influence on the Kurds. Following the Kurdish course, the Americans will be able to limit the victories of both Russia and Iran.

Obviously, we note that the author has nothing to say about the current diplomatic victories of the United States in the region, and therefore the author hopes for future victories. They say that the Kurdish question, which the United States will solve in its own way, will put an obstacle in the path of Russian victories. However, the author “forgets” that such behavior in the international arena leads not just to peace, but to a new war and the redrawing of the borders of existing states. Well, this is the usual behavior of the "hegemon." But then it would not be worthwhile to write about “achieving peace”, which Russia allegedly will not do. It is difficult to achieve peace where the US is fueling war!

Observed and commented on Oleg Chuvakin
- especially for topwar.ru
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Shura Perm
    Shura Perm 28 November 2017 07: 55 New
    0
    Great article title! While overseas enemies are sponsoring isis and other offices, Syria will not see peace ...
    1. 210ox
      210ox 28 November 2017 08: 12 New
      +3
      That is, according to the title of the article, we are not capable of peacekeeping because the Amerzian ones interfere with us?
      1. Separ DNR
        Separ DNR 28 November 2017 08: 22 New
        +4
        Quote: 210ox
        That is, according to the title of the article, we are not capable of peacekeeping because the Amerzian ones interfere with us?

        Why not? Quite.
        But there is an "aggravating factor" in this whole action. Namely, the presence of US troops in Syria recourse .
        It's one thing if the USA FOREVER destabilized the situation, and it is completely different when they:
        " HELLO, WE ARE HERE! hi "
        1. Going
          Going 28 November 2017 09: 19 New
          +7
          But then it would not be worth writing about the "achievement of peace", which allegedly will not work out for Russia. It is difficult to achieve peace where the US is fomenting war!


          That says it all.
      2. Orionvit
        Orionvit 28 November 2017 08: 27 New
        0
        Peacemaking is available only where peace is desired. Otherwise, peace is forced by force (which is what happened in Syria). But what kind of peace can there be where the Americans are involved? The article is written correctly until there will be peace in the Middle East of the United States, as well as in the whole world. As long as the "citadel of democracy" exists, it will, by all means, carry this very democracy to everyone.
    2. Vend
      Vend 28 November 2017 10: 04 New
      0
      But will Moscow, having won the war, succeed in bringing the country to peace?
      Russia has enough experience in the peaceful coexistence of different peoples in one country. Settles all parties at the negotiating table and ... Syria will cease to exist, a country with a different name will appear within the territory of Syrian territory. Not Syria, but for example the Syrian People’s Republic. Or something else.
  2. aszzz888
    aszzz888 28 November 2017 07: 59 New
    +2
    ... at least Russia is trying to bring peace to the SAR, which cannot be said about the Merikatos ...
    1. Jedi
      Jedi 28 November 2017 08: 08 New
      +6
      The United States needs peace only in its own country and near its borders. yes
      1. Logall
        Logall 28 November 2017 08: 10 New
        +8
        Ie in Canada and Mexico?
        Max hi!
        1. Jedi
          Jedi 28 November 2017 08: 19 New
          +5
          Hi Sanya! hi
          Quote: Logall
          in Canada and Mexico?

          Exactly. In general, the title sounds strange:
          Russia will manage to bring Syria to the world. If Americans do not interfere!

          What does "if" mean? This is exactly what they do - they interfere.
          1. Going
            Going 28 November 2017 09: 20 New
            +7
            Their business was taken away from them - in their understanding, and they never forgive this, so there is still a long time.
            1. Jedi
              Jedi 28 November 2017 09: 23 New
              +4
              That's right - for the "long dollar" they will go to great lengths.
              1. Going
                Going 28 November 2017 09: 26 New
                +7
                It's like Koschee's "needle", they'll break the dollar and that's it ...
                1. Jedi
                  Jedi 28 November 2017 09: 31 New
                  +4
                  But so far this needle is not broken for various reasons ...
                  1. Going
                    Going 28 November 2017 09: 38 New
                    +7
                    While they are trying to drive her into "teski".
  3. Vard
    Vard 28 November 2017 08: 00 New
    +2
    Russia will manage to bring Syria to the world. If Americans do not interfere!
    They will eat something ... but who will give them ... It seems that Russia, after a long break, has finally begun to do in world politics what it wants ... and not what it is allowed ...
  4. Tusv
    Tusv 28 November 2017 08: 17 New
    0
    Russia's exit from the Syrian crisis has significantly strengthened Moscow's military and diplomatic reputation, the analyst agrees
    .
    OOPS. Analitege, When our Rocket Guards dispose of FABs about the drunkards' heads, they say that we are gone. We have not only entrusted our dear comrades with their ears to bother. Spanking well
  5. shura7782
    shura7782 28 November 2017 08: 29 New
    0
    If the Americans don't interfere.
    Why IF? The author knows the answer, but is disingenuous. The Americans will interfere with us with all their pioneer enthusiasm so that much larger fathers cannot be avoided. The war for Syria passes into another phase of confrontation - Russia-USA. Civil war is what the Americans are thinking.
  6. Berber
    Berber 28 November 2017 08: 32 New
    +1
    The paid journalist does another pseudo-analyst. I'm tired of it.
    1. Dashout
      Dashout 29 November 2017 20: 30 New
      +4
      What Oleg Chuvakin did not please you?
      1. Berber
        Berber 1 December 2017 16: 32 New
        +1
        I like Oleg, I mean who the translation is from.
  7. Viktor.12.71
    Viktor.12.71 28 November 2017 08: 58 New
    0
    Greetings from Kostanay. Well, what's up with ruthenium? I read an article by Roshydromet that was recently deleted, the background of ruthenium was indicated as 7,72x10-5 (minus to the fifth power) Bq in the Argoyash area as extremely high? What is going on there?
  8. Sergey53
    Sergey53 28 November 2017 11: 14 New
    +2
    "Russia will succeed in bringing Syria to peace. If the Americans do not interfere." So, are we going to wait when they interrupt us?
    1. Separ DNR
      Separ DNR 28 November 2017 11: 35 New
      +2
      Quote: Sergey53
      "Russia will succeed in bringing Syria to peace. If the Americans do not interfere." So, are we going to wait when they interrupt us?

      They are already getting in the way. See my comment on the topic above.
  9. Tolik_74
    Tolik_74 29 November 2017 13: 36 New
    +1
    Where there are vultures, there are only wars and devastation.