Military Review

About the national idea of ​​association

33

“Whoever does not regret the collapse of the Soviet Union has no heart.

And who wants to restore it in its previous form - he has no head. ”

V.V. Putin


Analyzing and evaluating recent articles in the blogosphere, including on the website of Nikolai Starikov http://nstarikov.ru, leader of the All-Russian Party the Great Fatherland, one of the most progressive and patriotic parties in the political horizon, according to the most current ideological theme, I offer my own vision of the situation of this range of discussions, taking as an object, as an object of discussion, the blog article by N.V. Starikov and Air Defense "12 Principles: Political and Economic Program of the Great Fatherland Party", which is one of the main party documents, concentrating on its third principle.

"3. The principle of priority of the common good over personal

We must realize that striving for personal benefit to the detriment of public interests ultimately leads to the breakdown of society and the state, and therefore, it hurts every single member of society. Therefore, each of us must understand and accept the principle of the priority of the public good over the personal. The priority of public interest implies the importance of the growth of individual well-being and the quality of personal consumption. "

The older generation well remembers the words from a famous song to the poems of I. Shaferan: “Think before about the Homeland, and then about yourself.” I believe that the formulated name and interpretation of the above Principle, in the root, and in its essence, is not true. Because it, when implemented, will fully return the country in Soviet times. And this is not reasonable, for the simple reason that in such an approach to the legal relations between citizens and the state was the main misconception of the then leadership of the country, which led to a fatal mistake of management and, as a result, to the collapse of the USSR. I will try to explain in detail why.

The national idea (goal) is also inextricably linked with the concept of the country's socio-economic development, like its civil society, with the ideology (rules arising from and determined by the national idea), according to which citizens can, and agree to live together on certain borders territory. The absence, at least one of the mentioned constituent categories: economic or spiritual-moral, also inextricably linked - either ideas or ideologies - sooner or later, leads to the inevitable collapse of the country and the collapse of the state.

The main supporting resource of the country - the carriers of sovereignty and the only source of power, in any state with an internal structure similar to the Russian Federation - are its citizens.

And, precisely, the citizens inhabiting such a state, by their will and consent to the maintenance and functioning of the administrative apparatus for the implementation of state administration (in the publication of laws, on the basis of them - to establish appropriate legal relations and pay the established taxes), create (constitute) the state itself and in the period of its existence, they are constantly engaged in its development, protection of sovereignty, strengthening of economic and defense power, as well as the formation of civil institutions and improved public-state relations.

The state, in turn, through the Constitution (Social Contract) and the legal framework, undertakes to create and ensure conditions for successful coexistence and living of citizens of the country within the boundaries of a certain territory.

At the same time, a guarantee of the dynamic development of Russia and the basis of its existence is the economic model of production relations, the principles of which, under the current conditions of the changing world technological order, were introduced and imposed on Russia from the outside, but are alien to our society and are objectively characterized as occupational.

And, only, since 1993 of the year, the voluntary-compulsory finding of Russia in the “sucking swamp” of the false principles of social and economic development, where the Anglo-Saxons led by the Washington Regional Committee have deceived the country, does not allow us to get out on the dry land of development. Although, you could make a reasonable “exit to the land” without much difficulty, skillfully using, as a “straw” - a unique, richest creative experience gained during the Soviet times, the only world rightholder, which we are after the Great Russian Revolution 1917 of the year.

Staying in the current conditions of development and retaining the imposed paradigm of the economy, all our efforts will “go into the sand” - to a meaningless confrontation with the West, to prove their truth and endless justifiable-humiliating actions of Russia’s not existing fault for any reason.

Today, citizens and the state in Russia, from the standpoint of the institution of law and, exclusively declarative, although, within the framework of the legislative field (i.e., in the context of idle or missing laws), are equal subjects of legal relations. But, which should and can become such "de jure" (in their practical application after the fact), with the fulfillment and observance of one indispensable condition: when introducing into life in society and the state an appropriate mechanism for exercising equity right with the adoption of law-forming laws, changes to existing and amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, which, for 74 of the one-party rule of the CPSU, could not be offered to the people of the USSR, nor by the communists, and in the Russian Federation none of the current parliamentary parties for 26 years after the collapse of the Union, act boiling, unfortunately, as a nominally uniform subjects (not to say - puppets) the existing political system. And their goals and objectives are similar, as two drops of water.

We are talking about the condition of granting the citizens of the Russian Federation the right and the opportunity of everyone, through a legally established mechanism, to dispose of their share of property in the national wealth of the country by the right of their birth and citizenship in the Russian Federation, without the right to single out their share in kind. Now, a similar and similar principle of disposing of its property share is implemented by the owners of the premises in the common property of apartment buildings, within the framework of the Housing Code of the Russian Federation.

Implementation of this principle across the country, in relation to its national property, will be implemented in society and the state fundamental, universal values ​​and the concept of "equality", "solidarity" and "justice", which will automatically be removed from the agenda (eliminated) the mass of negative processes occurring in the internal life, such as corruption, illegal migration, oligarchy, the withdrawal of capital abroad, paid health care, education, access to full legislative and legal information, and etc. A need for one of the parts of the relatively recently created ministry - the department of social protection of the population - is about changing the system policy of which, not later than October 04 of 2017, at the plenary session of the forum “Russian Energy Week”, said our leader : “We certainly need to change a lot in the field of social policy. What I mean: you need to create a system in which state aid will be targeted in the direction of those people and for those categories of citizens who need it, and not for everyone in the same way, which is now observed in the health sector and in social support , and so on."

The life-affirming actions of I.V. Stalin, when, even after an exhausting, perfidious and devastating war, as head of state, he came to the conclusion that the country was pursuing a policy of annually reducing prices for the population for food and industrial essential goods, and the communal resources to ensure the everyday needs of citizens , simply, free (and, if this fact was one of the root causes of his death?).

Actions I.V. Stalin is explicable and understandable - article 6 of the Constitution of the USSR 1936 of the year was established: "Land, its subsoil, water, forests, factories, mines, mines, rail, water and air transport, banks, communications, organized by the state large agricultural enterprises ( state farms, machine-tractor stations, etc.), as well as utilities and the main housing stock in cities and industrial centers are state property, that is, the national property. "
And, precisely because today we live according to other people's rules, citizens, as individuals who receive water, gas, electricity for domestic needs in their homes, even in their standard volumes of consumption for each registered at the place of permanent residence, pay they have communal resources. This happens, despite the fact that, formally, under the Law, they belong to the state, but, consequently, the normative share is to citizens (they, the state and citizen, as subjects of legal relations, are equal in rights), not forgetting that the housing itself, now, far from being, exclusively, state property.

Therefore, the question in the air defense program on the priority advantages of one legal entity over another is also not correct, as is the dispute about the primordial nature of the chicken or the egg. And, equal rights of the state and citizen defined by the Constitution of the Russian Federation as subjects of legal relations, in their mutual striving to ensure the sovereignty of the first and enhance the personal benefits of the second, respectively, along with the duty of the state to protect the rights and interests of citizens, a priori, cannot lead to the collapse of society and the state.

Moreover, the implementation of the principle of shared ownership across the country, in accordance with the Theory of Dovolizm, will ensure conditions for every citizen and lead them to realize, not in words (declaratively and virtually), but in practice, their importance and place in society and the state to govern the country, as well as to bear the Holy duty of preserving the unshakable and unifying burden of personal and common sovereignty of the Motherland.

A country cannot be successful if the welfare of the absolute majority of its citizens remains low and not “sharpened” for self-stimulation of an individual to his maximum (the proposed mechanism would be motivated by this), in striving for this maximum well-being of the efforts of the citizens themselves. It is impossible to achieve success and, in the absence of a desire to strengthen these conditions by the state, in order to continually improve the well-being of each individual, in comparison with similar objective indicators of the well-being of citizens of the outside world.

Conclusion from the above

A nationwide idea and ideology is vital for the country.

For a national idea and a strategic goal for Russia, as well as the Ideology of the Just Rights of Citizens (ISPG) developed on its basis - a peculiar civil spiritual-moral code - at this stage of development and in the conditions of a changing global technological order and the empowerment of every citizen of the Russian Federation with the right and ability to dispose of his share of property in the national wealth, subject to realization and consolidation in the life of society and the state, through The existing established mechanism of the timeframe, with a deep and transparent application of communication and digital accounting and reporting technologies, with direct interdependence and coordination with the sovereign credit and banking system, exclusively within the country.

Its action should be defined indefinitely, and implementation - for the upcoming 10 years of rapid development. Further, life itself dictates and corrects other possible goals and objectives for which future generations will formulate the subsequent idea or extend the current one.

And most importantly. The most important result for Russia, if the proposed mechanism is implemented, will be that the inevitable change of the existing model of socio-economic development and management, which is based on occupation principles, to the concept of Trust Management, based on the principles of the Dolerian Theory principles of conciliarity, high morality, justice, equality, solidarity, mutual assistance, traditional Christian and family values, etc.), which will contribute to fundamental, progressive changes in the lifestyle of Russian citizens and supporters of the Russian World, in creating and maintaining the conditions for their sustainable development and prosperity.
Such a scheme is not ashamed to offer the world community for export.
Author:
Photos used:
Author
33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Chertt
    Chertt 29 November 2017 11: 13
    +3
    When the "Leftists" finally cease q ***** and create, conditionally, the "Union of Left Forces". Already the people are ready and the leaders have been identified, and, very pleased, well-educated people of middle age
    1. IS-80_RVGK2
      IS-80_RVGK2 29 November 2017 11: 46
      +1
      Quote: Chertt
      Already, the people are ready and the leaders have become apparent,

      And who are these leaders? Who is there today for Lenin, Stalin and Trotsky? laughing
      1. Chertt
        Chertt 29 November 2017 11: 54
        +5
        For Lenin, Stalin and Trotsky? with us, Lenin, Stalin, and Trotsky
        The left movement is a little bit wider laughing
        1. Varyag_0711
          Varyag_0711 29 November 2017 12: 55
          21
          For a national idea and a strategic goal for Russia, as well as the Ideology of the Just Rights of Citizens (ISPG) developed on its basis - a peculiar civil spiritual-moral code - at this stage of development and in the conditions of a changing global technological order and the empowerment of every citizen of the Russian Federation with the right and ability to dispose of his share of property in the national wealth, subject to realization and consolidation in the life of society and the state, through The existing established mechanism of the timeframe, with a deep and transparent application of communication and digital accounting and reporting technologies, with direct interdependence and coordination with the sovereign credit and banking system, exclusively within the country.
          I’m wondering, did the author himself understand what he wrote? What is the time frame, what is the legal support, what is the share of the citizen’s property? Another voucher? Who will do this? The article is a set of some crazy ideas that are not implemented in principle. Who will write the legal framework for the division of property among Russian citizens? The oligarchs who own this property?
          Some bullshit! Yes, and Stalin dragged here. Stalin was building a state for the people, and now a state for the oligarchs! The author either flew to us from the Moon, or one of two.
          1. Dimy4
            Dimy4 29 November 2017 15: 29
            0
            The author either flew to us from the Moon, or one of two.

            Hi, I was born! Haha
            1. Varyag_0711
              Varyag_0711 29 November 2017 16: 11
              11
              Dimy4 Today, 15:29 PM ↑
              Hi, I was born! Haha
              Well, what can I say to that? Congratulations!
              No offense, but what is hi, such is the answer.
        2. IS-80_RVGK2
          IS-80_RVGK2 29 November 2017 13: 11
          +1
          Quote: Chertt
          The left movement is a little bit wider

          Left movement is currently a bunch of clowns.
          1. Antianglosax
            Antianglosax 29 November 2017 21: 08
            +1
            Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
            Quote: Chertt
            The left movement is a little bit wider

            Left movement is currently a bunch of clowns.

            Guess who benefits from making them a bunch of clowns and maximize the disconnect, which happens ...
      2. vlad007
        vlad007 29 November 2017 13: 02
        +1
        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
        And who are these leaders? Who is there today for Lenin, Stalin and Trotsky?


        The most famous and competent, in my opinion, representative of the leftist forces is the writer Zakhar Prilepin. He positions himself as a "national Bolshevik", there was such a party (National Bolsheviks) - banned! On Fridays, he broadcasts Russian Lessons on NTV. The network has a lot of videos with Zakhar Prilepin, there is a channel "Tsargrad" where he leads the program "Tea with Zakhar" - this is an interview with famous people.
        Other representatives of the left-wing forces include: writer Sergei Shargunov, by the way, State Duma deputy from the Communist Party, Eduard Limonov.
        1. IS-80_RVGK2
          IS-80_RVGK2 29 November 2017 14: 26
          +1
          Quote: vlad007
          The most famous and competent, in my opinion, representative of the leftist forces is the writer Zakhar Prilepin.

          Well, he can chat, write too. What about such trifles as economics and politics, government?
        2. Sling cutter
          Sling cutter 29 November 2017 17: 32
          +2
          Quote: vlad007
          Other representatives of the left-wing forces include: writer Sergei Shargunov, by the way, State Duma deputy from the Communist Party, Eduard Limonov.

          There is also the Left Front with Udaltsov and PDS NPSR
    2. viktorch
      viktorch 29 November 2017 17: 45
      0
      some have already followed the daredevil - it turned out that the daredevil didn’t have much in Bosko, both in terms of rationalization and ideological preparation.
  2. tasha
    tasha 29 November 2017 11: 51
    +7
    Author! Go to some meeting of HOA participants, it is best when the issue of some common property will be decided ...
    You will understand a lot. wink

    will provide conditions for each citizen and will lead to their awareness

    will not allow and will not lead. Unless with the help of special emitter towers wink
  3. evsyukov_a
    evsyukov_a 29 November 2017 11: 53
    +6
    “You, professor, your will, you thought up something awkward! It may be smart, but painfully incomprehensible. "
    "... with the adoption of law-forming laws, amendments to existing ones and amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, which, for 74 years of the one-party rule of the CPSU, could not be offered to the people of the USSR" - on this statement I suggest the author to get acquainted with what I myself witnessed - discussion of the Constitution 1977 Further citation: “The May 1977 Plenum of the CPSU Central Committee examined the draft Constitution of the USSR submitted by the Constitutional Commission and approved it mainly. Following this, the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR adopted a decree on submitting the draft for public discussion. On June 4, 1977, a new draft The Constitution of the USSR was published in the central and local press, and it began a nationwide discussion, which lasted about four months, and over 140 million people, or more than 4/5 of the country's adult population, took part in the discussion. thousand proposals aimed at clarifying, improving and supplementing the draft Constitution. data during the nationwide discussion were taken into account and used in the finalization of the draft Constitution. ". Something like this...
  4. Dimmih
    Dimmih 29 November 2017 12: 03
    +8
    The ideology of the Fair Law of Citizens (ISPG) is a peculiar, civil spiritual and moral code ...... The use of psychotropic drugs without a doctor’s prescription has a detrimental effect on the brain! Why fan the 10 commandments to the size of a complete works?
  5. Odysseus
    Odysseus 29 November 2017 12: 06
    +9
    I wonder what is going on in the minds of people writing such articles? Most likely they live in a country of pink ponies and communicate with the elves every day.
    Well, what is the "national idea" and the "theory of Dolevism"? I would like to invite the authors to go to Miller, Mamut or Kerimov and tell them that "Think about your Homeland before, and then about yourself."
    Yes, only such dull rogues will not be allowed to reach them even for a kilometer.
    1. andrej-shironov
      andrej-shironov 29 November 2017 15: 55
      +1
      You are in vain! In any case, the author did the work and not just stupidly criticized!
  6. Hlavaty
    Hlavaty 29 November 2017 13: 38
    +4
    empowering citizens of the Russian Federation with the right and opportunity of everyone, through a legislatively established mechanism, to dispose of their share of property in the national property of the country by the right of birth and citizenship in the Russian Federation, without the right to allocate their share in kind.

    The author, at least hint how to implement this in practice!
    In order to determine the share of "property in the national property of the country" you need to at least determine this property. Conduct a national inventory! And here thieves of all levels will become a breast - from a petty official to an oligarch. It will be necessary to show EVERYTHING to the people !!! And there, the tax bunch will have a lot of questions ...
    But in the USSR (a more social state than today's Russia), such attempts ended pitifully for the initiators. Read about the "National Automated System for Accounting and Processing Information", at least on the same Wikipedia - shed a tear.
  7. The comment was deleted.
  8. Sofa General
    Sofa General 29 November 2017 14: 10
    +5
    leader of the All-Russian Party of the Great Fatherland, one of the most progressive and patriotic parties in the political horizon

    After this phrase, the author realized the article would be about nothing ...
    I read it.
    And there is.
    Author. Take off your pink glasses.
    And, if you are such an apologist for Starikov, explain why Starikov himself so carefully avoids answering an elementary question: HOW is he going to come to power, replace EP, if EP, in his own words, controls everything, all areas?
    And, by the way, Starikov’s main message is "Englishwoman shits", so why did his daughter learn from "Englishwoman"?
    1. creak
      creak 29 November 2017 15: 47
      0
      Quote: Sofa General
      why did Starikov himself so diligently evade the answer

      Interestingly, but besides Starikov himself, is anyone else in this Great Fatherland? Some sort of megalomania with complications in the form of infantilism ... The less greatness, the more megalomania ....
      The same Prilepin noted in Donbass, “risked his life” - and if someone did not notice his feat, he had to give an interview on TV dressed in camouflage ... All that was needed was a bulletproof vest — almost like in the song “Head tied, blood on the sleeve” "... Obviously, a person did not play war games in childhood, they did not accept the company ... soldier
      1. viktorch
        viktorch 29 November 2017 17: 41
        0
        I prefer, from the Donbass polit-zashkvary, Kuryagin or Kurginyan, I don’t know what to call him right now, I liked it with my run over the gunner, I’ve annealed it, I’ve annealed it, the sect almost fell apart.
    2. andrej-shironov
      andrej-shironov 29 November 2017 15: 54
      +3
      I put you a plus for the right questions. That's just to learn from the adversaries is not shameful! If only it were done for the homeland.
  9. IS-80_RVGK2
    IS-80_RVGK2 29 November 2017 14: 45
    +2
    Parties of the Great Fatherland, one of the most progressive and patriotic parties in the political horizon

    Hand face. Someone shoot the author. I can’t watch how he suffers from stupidity.
  10. viktorch
    viktorch 29 November 2017 15: 37
    +2
    what a shameless advertisement of the talker Straikov,
    such personalities are mostly talking about good oligarchs who will replace the evil and share with the people, and all in the name of a great national idea, with solidarity and mighty Russia,

    have already changed in Ukraine
    1. To be or not to be
      To be or not to be 29 November 2017 16: 22
      +2
      New Vasyuki -3.
      There used to be New Vasyuki -2- or Russian billion!
      "" We need a "Russian billion"
      22.11.2012 (22.11.2012) 958
      After voicing the idea of ​​“Russian billion” in Videoblog No. 15, I received a large number of letters and questions asking me to clarify my position.

      What is the "Russian billion"? "We must do everything necessary to ensure that Russia's population reaches a billion people."
      https://nstarikov.ru/blog/21958
      Behind the global ideas are not visible people and their needs. Darkly further ????????????
      1. viktorch
        viktorch 29 November 2017 17: 25
        +4
        I think soon we will see articles on the site - tracing paper and with a kurginyan,

        the old talker, carrying nonsense, which dilutes the stuffing of frankly brown ideas, with solidarism and corparativism, and other things "the people and the oligarchs are one."

        in Russia, first of all, there is the question of the opposing desires of the bonuses of “national capital” and the bulk of the population, on all internal and external political and economic issues.

        there can be no talk of solidarity and corparativism in this situation.

        ruin is the most beautiful modern example of such a path
  11. andrej-shironov
    andrej-shironov 29 November 2017 15: 52
    +1
    Dear Oleg! I have two remarks: why can’t you think about your homeland and then about yourself earlier? Yes, the ideal is not achievable, but you must strive for it! And then, everything seems to be written correctly, but what are the mechanisms for implementing all this? In any case, thanks to the author for the work!
    1. chizano
      30 November 2017 22: 32
      +1
      "... You can’t think about your homeland and then about yourself" because:
      firstly, in accordance with the law, these are two equal subjects of legal relations, striving for the manifestation of an equally dependent interest in maintaining sovereignty, both one and the other;
      secondly, a citizen, as a person, is primary in relation to the state, because he, as part of a specific community of people, at a meeting (council, gathering, referendum) "having agreed among themselves", agreeing with the Constitution and paying taxes, form (establish ) state;
      and, thirdly, no one forbids, however, to think so and to do as you put it. But, I believe, then conditions are created when the power of those in power has a “great” temptation to put themselves not on a par with others, but a little higher, and the functionaries of the government begin to dictate their own, sometimes self-serving conditions, hiding behind state necessity. That is, in this case, unfortunately, the representative (local elected) authorities, "from top to bottom", without consulting on behalf of the state with equal peers, begin to turn into a dictatorial regime, not to mention the legislative, executive branch and courts. As we observe in everyday life, "around and around."
      Implementation mechanism. I’ll try briefly, the essence, on the example of one nomenclature of the national heritage - natural gas - produced by PJSC Gazprom from the bowels of our Fatherland.
      The profit received in the interests of the country (for "bins of the Motherland") from the sale of gas abroad, according to the results of the reporting period (I believe, the year) is credited in equal shares of the proceeds to the virtual personal account of every, without exception, citizen, almost 147 of the millionth population RF, living at the time of enrollment, which can be called compensatory accruals.
      And so, for all natural resources, raw materials, system-forming enterprises with state participation, industrial-production enterprises of the fuel and energy complex, as well as participating in foreign economic activity. Each citizen transfers all these funds to trust (at disposal) to the state in accordance with the Constitution, which, in fact (de facto), is happening today. However, each capable citizen, older than 21 year, or parents, before reaching the age of majority of children (21 year), will be entitled to use all or part of the accumulated amount of funds in the interests of personal social needs and socially useful activities, such as: acquisition of housing, for expensive medical operations and services in critical situations, education abroad, etc., as well as for the creation (opening) of a business (farm or peasant farms a), both personally and as part of a group of individuals (squad), etc. The issue of allocating the necessary funds is carried out in a declarative manner by an interested person with the submission of relevant documents (certified certificates, agreements, business plans, etc.) and is decided in working procedure by permanent commissions with the mandatory participation of representatives of authorities and credit and banking institutions at the level of regional municipalities of regions (cities). Based on the results of spending the funds, the relevant accounting documents for the reporting period are provided to the same commission. Prior to the restoration of the used means of compensatory accruals in the personal account, their repeated request for the same purposes is possible in exceptional cases. In the event of a bankruptcy of a business for the creation of which the means of compensatory accruals of a citizen were used, recoverable funds from new receipts, in the amount received earlier, never in the future, can be directed by a citizen for the same purposes. The transfer of compensatory charges as a gift or by inheritance is prohibited.
      1. andrej-shironov
        andrej-shironov 1 December 2017 07: 56
        +1
        Dear Chinzano, I understand you. As for the first one, I will say that what you wrote is true, but only true from the point of view of formalism. But I would still add a share of idealism: think first about the Homeland and the Homeland will think about you. I understand that the mechanism of this is still foggy and not clear. More still relate to education and ideals.
        Regarding the second, I think your mechanism will lead, to one degree or another, to the appearance of loafers or people stupidly risking money, which they did not earn. I must admit that for the most part people are lazy, this is neither good nor bad, it is a fact. It seems to me that your mechanism is not without flaws, although in any case it should be thought over as evidence of the power of intelligence.
  12. Karen
    Karen 29 November 2017 16: 21
    0
    I remember more and more the old ... I’m getting old, I guess.
    That's about the actions to unite the people (Jewish, of course) I read about 30 years ago ... there were people / authors in our time, not that ... hereinafter.
    In general, there was an Anti-Zionist Committee in our country ... Dragoon headed ... Caesar Solodar, it seems, was his deputy ... and so, in his book "Wild Wormwood" it was told how at the beginning of the last century the Zionists walked around cities and villages of the Republic of Ingushetia and called for the fraternization of Jews ... there were all sorts of comic cases when Jews from the lower classes said that they were consonants, but would they agree from their upper classes?
    _____
    In general, they succeeded ... It remains so that they do not interfere, so that you succeed. :)
  13. askme
    askme 3 December 2017 04: 12
    +1
    The left idea in the form of "take everything away and share", "robbed loot" - is as old as the world. The Bolsheviks tried to build a working ideology on it. But this ideology had power, while its altar was poured with the blood of "scapegoats" and dreamed of world evolution. As soon as they stopped cutting each other at the top, as soon as they lost their animal fear, immediately a purulent party nomenclature inevitably formed with its hypocrisy of officialdom combined with secret elite consumption and squabbles for the feeding trough. Old as the world: ideology degenerated into a hypocritical squalor, when wealth and elitism are denied in words, but in fact thieves and nepotism flourish, implicated in the privileges of the elite. That is, the whole history of the Bolsheviks ended with the ugliness of dividing people into a bar and bylo, in the CPSU itself. Such is the nature of the Bolsheviks: this is the nature of vice.

    And all over the world with all the left the same situation.

    Thus, it became apparent that left and right ideas are one thing. That liberalism with its social Darwinism, that communism with its war against the rich are one thing, it is the ideology of social hatred, only from different angles. Two sides of the same coin - hate. And both ideologies are false: in words, good intentions cover up the vice of their preachers. These are false quasi-religions, in fact, based on dogma, on presets that are taken for granted ...

    The world went through both lessons, experienced it personally. People are well aware that fanatics organize revolutions, are the woods of the revolution, and take advantage of their results, the heat from the combustion of the "firewood fanatics" - scum. The USSR ended its days in the insanity of leadership only because at the very top were people who could only shrug off responsibility for others for failure, while at the same time appropriating the results of someone else's decisions that had brought success. Such "leaders" were panicky afraid of responsibility. The shaky hands of Yanaev and the little Gorbachev in the absence of alternatives to them in power are a sentence to communism.

    Our left-wing demagogues like China to cite as an example. Not understanding the essence of China. Which in fact has long since broken with the planned economy and lives in a market economy, the opposite of the foundations of communism. That is, they give out fantasies for reality. As usual, however.

    Our country has received the exhaustive experience of communist ideas, the experience of vice. It is fully analyzed. Fixed on various media in archives. People over 50 years old are well aware of the realities of the USSR. They do not powder their brains. But very young, accustomed to the benefits of a market economy, the old propagandists are trying to brainwash them, of course, but this already has no power. Because there is no truth behind these ideas.

    In the end, young people also understand that they are just trying to fire a fire old experienced comrades like firewood, but the old people themselves do not climb into the fire, they like warmth, rather than burning themselves. This is affected by the old school of the CPSU, the school of cynic functionaries who use enthusiasts as a thing, as cattle, as a consumable. The school that destroyed the empire of Russia and the USSR ... There will be no double) They do not enter the same river twice, no matter how you fantasize the opposite ...
    1. chizano
      3 December 2017 08: 56
      0
      The proposed option does not imply entering the same river of life (water) for the second time. We are talking about a fundamental reconstruction of the way to overcome the same river, after its bending, therefore, in another place, continuing to move forward, but we will not overcome the ford, but along the built Kerch bridge. "Being defines consciousness," it is true. But this is precisely the trouble of our hundred-year period of existence, after the Revolution, that the Great Idea of ​​Justice was proclaimed, but did not descend on the sinful earth, twisted in clouds. The Bolsheviks (Communists) could not offer the people any opportunities for the realization in everyday life and the economy of the state, somewhat distorted by the people themselves, of the principle "Everything is popular, everything is mine." There were and are, only words and demagogy in this matter, here you are right. But the proposed version of a radical change in the way of life of Russian citizens, nobody calls you to revolution. Perhaps the following statement is applicable to your comment: "Everyone thinks to the best of his depravity."
  14. NordUral
    NordUral 3 December 2017 23: 46
    0
    “Whoever does not regret the collapse of the Soviet Union has no heart.
    And who wants his recovery as before [i] [/ i] - he has no head. ”
    V.V. Putin


    And who says that this is how the Union should be revived? it is understood that adjustments are vital. And it will be done. And the Union, I don’t know in what composition only, would be recreated for the benefit of its citizens. No other is given.