National Interest: Russia decided to focus on the development of ground forces

30
In its new armament plan for 2018-2027, the Kremlin will focus on spending on ground forces. Earlier, the Russian authorities paid more attention to modernization fleetwrites The National Interest. Article leads InoTV.





Such attention to ground weapons systems is explained by the recent "Russian experience in Ukraine" and the fact that most of the equipment is already ready for mass production, the newspaper notes.

Tanks T-90 and T-14 Armata, infantry fighting vehicles Kurganets-25 and Boomerang are expected to enter service over the next eight years. Although the number of Armata tanks may be limited due to the high cost of production,
says the senior researcher at the American Center for Naval Analysis, Dmitry Gorenburg.

In parallel with this, Russia will continue to produce new artillery and rocket systems in order to replace the “Soviet legacy”. In particular, the new prospective installation “Coalition” should replace the self-propelled howitzer “Msta”

“At the same time, despite the speed with which the modernization continues — the Russian ground forces receive new reconnaissance and surveillance systems, as well as electronic warfare, not everything goes smoothly. Russia is trying to introduce the doctrine of the setcentric war, which implies the creation of a single information and communication space for coordinated actions of all forces, but is still behind the planned schedule, ”the material says.

There are problems with tactical automated ground control systems,
assures the analyst.

According to him, the Russian military "have mixed feelings about this technology and may decide that it needs to be improved before widespread use." In this case, the development of means of conducting a network-centric war, they "will have to be postponed until 2027 year.

In general, the Russian army has “enough power to contain all its neighbors in the post-Soviet space with conventional weapons, but the Kremlin still has to rely on a nuclear arsenal to stop China or NATO,” the magazine notes.

In terms of impact on military capabilities, Russia is already strong enough to defend itself in a conventional war against any adversary and defeat any neighboring country, with the exception of China. Thus, the new weapons program will be aimed at keeping up with the technological improvements made by its competitors (members of NATO and China),
adds Gorenburg.

In other words, despite the uneven pace, Russia continues to catch up with its rivals. However, it "will lag behind the United States and, possibly, China in certain areas," the publication concludes.
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    27 November 2017 09: 13
    I am amazed at the level of analysts of this portal. Interest Club no more.
    1. +18
      27 November 2017 09: 17
      Quote: BerBer
      I am amazed at the level of analysts of this portal. Interest Club no more.

      And where does the portal? This is not their article! This article is National Interest!
      Read carefully! The portal simply reviewed this article ...
      1. +3
        27 November 2017 09: 43
        Alexander hi The site is often referred to it. But the whole point is that this publication is not some kind of top-end or something. In the West there are more serious analysts.
        Quote: Logall
        Quote: BerBer
        I am amazed at the level of analysts of this portal. Interest Club no more.

        And where does the portal? This is not their article! This article is National Interest!
        Read carefully! The portal simply reviewed this article ...
      2. +5
        27 November 2017 09: 57
        from NI only 10-15 percent of the objective, the rest bullshit biased.
      3. +2
        27 November 2017 10: 51
        It is logical! Russia in the center of the WORLD. We are close to everywhere. Here by land and get to adversary. Do not drown the land, in contrast to the Zaluzh giant irons. Here they will be sinking as cute. Well, we’ll easily get into the puddle through the tiny strait. It is not for nothing that we strengthen and train the land grouping in the Arctic. And with the fleet, that sea, that air, everything is in order with us.
    2. +7
      27 November 2017 09: 25
      Another analytics from Mars ...? laughing However, the emphasis once again of our constant lag is a balm for wounds to a healthy western reader, since the time of Napoleon and Hitler:"Russia is a big pile of rotten potatoes" и "An ear of clay feet!" laughing
      1. +3
        27 November 2017 09: 39
        There is some kind of Indian especially stubborn ..
        Quote: Finches
        Another analytics from Mars ...? laughing However, the emphasis once again of our constant lag is a balm for wounds to a healthy western reader, since the time of Napoleon and Hitler:"Russia is a big pile of rotten potatoes" и "An ear of clay feet!" laughing
      2. +3
        27 November 2017 09: 44
        Quote: Finches
        Another analytics from Mars ...?
        More likely from the future. Otherwise, how to explain this passage
        In this case, the development of means of conducting a network-centric war they "will have to postpone until 2027"
        Is it just to postpone it for ten years and that's all? No, senior scientist Dmitry Gorenburg clearly knows something! laughing
    3. +1
      27 November 2017 10: 24
      Well yes. Fleet, VKS, we have already upgraded. The infantry remained. winked How embarrassed these analysts are. They are already more than divorced managers. belay
      1. 0
        27 November 2017 11: 38
        In May 1945, Private Ivan Ivanovich Ivanov was the first to sign the Infantry Guard at the Reichstag: “I am satisfied with the ruins of the Reichstag!”
    4. +2
      27 November 2017 10: 56
      I think worse. They analyze the information from the network and present it as powerful analytical data. And still we are behind the USA and China in hypersound ....)))))))
      1. 0
        27 November 2017 12: 42
        Quote: Kent0001
        I think worse. They analyze the information from the network and present it as a powerful analytical data.
        Probably, they are not only analyzing, but once again inspiring that Russia, this is a “land power”, we don’t need to develop a fleet ... I hope that it will not wait.
      2. 0
        28 November 2017 18: 10
        [quote = Kent0001] They analyze the information from the network and present it as significant analytical data. [/ quote Let me note that in fact there are no methods of mathematical analysis that really takes into account the totality of the interaction and development of processes in one direction or another. And what does exist? There is a subjective analysis of people who use the potential of their brain, but in reality, basing their analysis on the collection of statistical data, that’s all. Moreover, machine methods using binary code are not capable of analysis, since they do not work as a technological tool for processing super-large data.
  2. +6
    27 November 2017 09: 16
    will lag behind the United States and China in certain areas ”
    you need to pour a spoonful of tar!
    1. +5
      27 November 2017 09: 23
      Volodya hi
      Quote from Uncle Lee
      you need to pour a spoonful of tar!

      Rather, it’s a spoonful of valerian for complacency. wink
      1. +6
        27 November 2017 09: 30
        Hi Max! hi
        Drink poison, even pour it over!
        They don’t take the benefit of money,
        How rope do not twist
        Anyway, stick your whip!
        1. +4
          27 November 2017 09: 35
          good These words would be translated into the Aglitz dialect, and given exceptional read ...
    2. +7
      27 November 2017 09: 24
      This is a balm for the United States, and we ... we need to develop ground forces because, let them look at our map.
    3. +4
      27 November 2017 09: 26
      We have a nuclear thinner on their tar spoon.
      But sho, nuclear weapons are no longer an argument for those who have an envious eye and raking hands ... let them consider that we have not an advanced approach, their problems.
  3. +3
    27 November 2017 09: 24
    In parallel with this, Russia will continue to produce new artillery and rocket systems in order to replace the “Soviet legacy”. In particular, the new prospective installation “Coalition” should replace the self-propelled howitzer “Msta”

    8)))
    Here's a joke about changing socks. Right to left.
    The "coalition" will indeed change 2C19 ... in the artillery of the "senior commanders". After the modernization, the freed-up vehicles will replace 2С3 in the “lower level”, regimental, brigade and division artillery


    In this case, the development of means of conducting a network-centric war they "will have to postpone until 2027."

    The very "network-centric war" from which the Americans themselves are already starting to move away?
  4. +1
    27 November 2017 09: 25
    Such attention to ground weapons systems is explained by the recent "Russian experience in Ukraine" and the fact that most of the equipment is already ready for mass production, the newspaper notes.

    ... this is from their belfry a "vision" of the question ... bully
  5. 0
    27 November 2017 09: 32
    Quote: BerBer
    I am amazed at the level of analysts of this portal. Interest Club no more.

    What did you want from different Gorenburgs?
  6. +1
    27 November 2017 10: 30
    Yes, really ..... analysts. It’s even funny, we can lag behind China only in quantitative terms. NATO is generally an inflatable raft. On the other hand, it is even more profitable for us if our main opponents rely on such inferences.
    1. 0
      27 November 2017 10: 57
      So we will not persuade them.
  7. 0
    27 November 2017 10: 42
    The competence of Western analysts is their problem. They believed that while Putin is watching the winter Olympics in Sochi, a coup could be made in Ukraine. And it - PUK and Crimea fell off. For the United States, it was a big bummer.
    1. 0
      27 November 2017 21: 58
      and in the 8th year under the Olympics, too, it was no accident that it all started ....
  8. 0
    27 November 2017 10: 47
    In principle, the logical direction of development of today.
    In aviation, existing technologies are put into operation.
    The fifth generation is being worked out.
    A lot of work has already been done in the fleet, well, there is some hudder in the production of turbines for the fleet, they are working hard on this.
    At the moment, there are no fundamental obstacles to the development of ground forces and means.
    Yes, and funds for the development of land weapon systems require less.
    All in good time.
  9. 0
    27 November 2017 11: 07
    "The Russian military has mixed feelings about this technology and ... hereinafter." The level of technology is naturally high, but poor skills in using it and cause its rejection. Especially in the higher link.
  10. The comment was deleted.
  11. 0
    27 November 2017 14: 07
    The author you descreditirol yourself from the first lines of the opus))) "The Kremlin will focus on spending on ground troops." Everything further will be more beautiful, it happened))) Learn the hardware))) Otherwise, your words are not only not in the soul, ng with legs on the wings)))
  12. +2
    27 November 2017 22: 14
    National Interest: Russia decided to focus on the development of ground forces

    Actually the way it is. I would like more attention to our aerospace component, but no, looking at the pace of updating / re-equipping the aircraft fleet without any buildup (increase) with the formation of new aviation units (only as part of the reorganization). The likely superiority of the enemy in the aviation component will most likely be leveled by the military and object-based ground air defense systems, which we are traditionally strong in.
  13. 0
    28 November 2017 02: 12
    National Interest: Russia decided to focus on the development of ground forces

    Russia Russian Orthodox-develops ALL troops. And the development of ALL troops is correct.
  14. +4
    28 November 2017 11: 29
    Kremlin still has to rely on nuclear arsenal to stop China or NATO

    Well, NATO, let’s say, is not so eager to try to attack the Russian Federation, but what does China have to do with it? Despite their number, they are not suicides.
  15. The comment was deleted.