Military Review

Beijing has made concessions on missile defense issue from Seoul

26
China and South Korea have stabilized relations and confirmed earlier agreements concerning the deployment of the THAAD missile defense system on the Korean Peninsula, reports Kommersant.




In China, there is a saying that promises must be kept, and actions must be decisive. We hope that South Korea will properly address this issue,
said Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, after a conversation with his South Korean counterpart Kang Kyung-hwa in Beijing.

The Chinese minister was referring to the implementation of the agreement on the normalization of relations between the countries after October more than a year of cooling.

Relations will finally be restored during the first visit to Beijing by South Korean President Moon Zhe Ina (the preparation of the trip was the main content of the ministerial meeting).

"Seoul promised not to deploy new installations of the THAAD complex (there are six of them now) and not to integrate the country's missile defense into the American antimissile system in the region, and also ruled out the possibility of forming a trilateral alliance with the United States and Japan," the article says.

Kang Kyung-hwa also assured Chinese colleagues that the THAAD complex already deployed "would not be used against China under any circumstances."

I believe that these measures will allow us to overcome difficulties and quickly return to normal relations,
added the head of MFA RK.

According to estimates by the Korea Development Bank, the year of Beijing’s unofficial sanctions against Seoul (they started in August 2016 and increased in March 2017) cost “from $ 6,4 billion (direct losses) to $ 20,3 billion (lost profits)”. More than others went to Lotte, a multidisciplinary conglomerate, which provided its own golf course to host THAAD. Its sales in China for the year fell by 88%.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
26 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Samaritan
    Samaritan 24 November 2017 15: 42 New
    +4
    Oh how! Korean refrigerator defeats US missile defense system laughing
    1. Sofa General
      Sofa General 24 November 2017 15: 45 New
      13
      An example of how to fight for your interests. China well done!
      1. Samaritan
        Samaritan 24 November 2017 15: 48 New
        +2
        Well, we can too:
    2. destination
      destination 24 November 2017 15: 50 New
      +6
      I believe that these measures will allow us to overcome difficulties and quickly return to normal relations,
      added the head of MFA RK.
      Golden words. Nobody wants to fight. Well, except for some on our forum ...
      1. Kent0001
        Kent0001 24 November 2017 17: 31 New
        +1
        Yes, our forum is becoming more and more about nothing. It used to be more interesting.
        1. dustycat
          dustycat 25 November 2017 18: 21 New
          0
          What should I do.
          Who left this world, who is busy again, who scored on the site.
    3. NOMADE
      NOMADE 24 November 2017 15: 58 New
      +3
      )) Do not buy Lotte products, this is Chokopai, Milks, chips, etc. This is an international brand) Especially famous in Primorye. And they understand perfectly (not in accounting for us, but in general)).
    4. Paranoid50
      Paranoid50 24 November 2017 16: 32 New
      +5
      Quote: Samaritan
      Korean refrigerator won
      Well, yes - Samsung "side by side". laughing Duc, it’s not an hour, the northern neighbor can peer into it, if anything. Here Kimushka also played his role in the “five”.
    5. Nyrobsky
      Nyrobsky 25 November 2017 00: 19 New
      +1
      Quote: Samaritan
      Oh how! Korean refrigerator defeats US missile defense system

      They judged everything correctly. China at arm's length, and where is that freaking America?
  2. Incvizitor
    Incvizitor 24 November 2017 15: 46 New
    +3
    Seoul promised not to deploy new THAAD installations (there are six now) and not integrate the country's missile defense into the US missile defense system in the region, and also ruled out the possibility of forming a tripartite alliance with the United States and Japan

    Ohhhh soon "exceptional" and will be expelled from there, the old nag is bent, completely decrepit, to put to sleep the time. lol
  3. HEATHER
    HEATHER 24 November 2017 15: 46 New
    +5
    Seoul should listen to Beijing, and both to Moscow.
    1. Sofa General
      Sofa General 24 November 2017 15: 48 New
      +2
      With what fright is Moscow there?
      1. HEATHER
        HEATHER 24 November 2017 15: 50 New
        +1
        With what fright is Moscow there? Who rules the world?
        1. Sofa General
          Sofa General 24 November 2017 15: 55 New
          +3
          Really?
          An example of “taxiing” will not be difficult for you to bring, say, over the past year ...
          1. Anarchist
            Anarchist 24 November 2017 16: 01 New
            14
            Bows in Moscow for Middle Eastern sheikhs! hi
          2. HEATHER
            HEATHER 24 November 2017 16: 06 New
            +4
            An example of “taxiing” will not be difficult for you to bring, say, over the past year ... Syria doesn’t count? I can throw about Egypt. Or will Libya be the topic? Very soon. I can talk about Yellowstone. Your questions are my answers. Drive tightly.
            1. Sofa General
              Sofa General 24 November 2017 16: 26 New
              +5
              In spite I can object - scandals with WADA.
              Syria - hmm ... controversial, very controversial ...
              About Egypt and Libya, I will readily read the information.
              About Eelstone also agrees to replenish the baggage of knowledge.
              Share links, if not difficult.
              1. HEATHER
                HEATHER 24 November 2017 16: 31 New
                +1
                Share links, if not difficult.There are no links. Simple work. I am winding around the world here. WADA is a Kryndets soon to this office. Egypt, Libya, I can take it with me. Elstonestone, study geography.
                1. Sofa General
                  Sofa General 24 November 2017 16: 32 New
                  +2
                  There was no problem with geography.
                  Egypt and Libya - not thanks, you’d better come to us ... for three days.
                  About WADA - why tryndets and where does infa come from?
                  There were no links, only personal feelings? Weak evidence base.
                2. dustycat
                  dustycat 25 November 2017 18: 30 New
                  0
                  Yellowstone said another two.
                  WADA is harder.
                  Although if you revoke WADA admissions and certificates on the territory of RusADA controlled and allow access to competitions on the territory of Russia only with RusADA approval, then the issue with WADA claims will close faster than the message about it will fly through the Western media.
                  The question is whether this will be decided as with the decisions of European and international courts.
                  After the decision on international courts, the question of Yukos immediately took a different turn.
    2. CHEST OF DRAWERS
      CHEST OF DRAWERS 24 November 2017 16: 19 New
      +4
      Quote: VERESK
      Seoul should listen to Beijing, and both to Moscow.

      So it will be soon ...
    3. dustycat
      dustycat 25 November 2017 18: 23 New
      0
      Well so what Putin and Seoul and Beijing tryndel on the phone (judging by the leaks of news in the media)?
      Not only about Syria.
  4. Sergey53
    Sergey53 24 November 2017 15: 46 New
    +1
    The Chinese are well done. They can when they want.
    1. askort154
      askort154 24 November 2017 16: 29 New
      +2
      Sergey53 .....Chinese well done. They can when they want.


      But also South Korea, this is not Romania or Poland. Kang Gyeong-hwa, initially opposed the deployment of a US missile defense on its territory. The Americans pressed, and he retreated. When in April, they brought the first 2 installations, there were popular demonstrations of opponents. And after the "tearing up" with the DPRK, the United States brought 4. more, citing a threat to the DPRK. So, the Chinese did not need much effort. Although, of course, well done! They know how to convince.
  5. Hariton laptev
    Hariton laptev 24 November 2017 16: 24 New
    0
    Handsome men China is a true triumph of diplomacy.
  6. assa67
    assa67 24 November 2017 18: 26 New
    +3
    will China accept economic losses?