Military Review

France presented TITUS armored vehicle at the exhibition

24
At the Milipol 2017 exhibition in Paris, the French armored vehicle TITUS (Tactical Infantry Transport and Utility System) with the wheel formula 6х6, developed by Nexter Systems, is on display bmpd.




The company presented a pre-production sample of TITUS, operated by the RAID anti-terrorism unit of the French police. The first prototype was shown in the military 2013 year.

The TITUS machine is made on the Tatra Т815 chassis performed by 6x6, with axes evenly spaced along the body. The undercarriage also used elements of the Nexter armored personnel carrier demonstrated in the 2010 year.

In the basic version, TITUS has a mass of empty 17 tons, but in the version with enhanced armor, the combat mass increases to 23 tons.



“The car has a length of 7,55 m, a width of 2,55 m and a height on the roof of the 2,73 body. The basic version of the reservation corresponds to the NATO standard STANAG 4569 Level 2, but with the installation of additional modules it can be enhanced to the level 4. It is possible to install a special set of PG Guard to protect against RPGs. Mine protection is declared at the STANAG 4569 Level 4a and Level 4b levels, while the Nexter-developed patented SAFEPRO hull protection design allegedly ensures the survival of personnel in a vehicle when a landmine weighing up to 150 kg is blown up, ”the material says.

France presented TITUS armored vehicle at the exhibition


The armored vehicle is equipped with a 6-cylinder diesel engine Cummins in power options from 440 to 580 HP. with an Allison automatic transmission. The maximum speed is 110 km / h, the power reserve is up to 700 km. In the military version can be equipped with various remotely controlled combat modules.


Photos used:
bmpd
24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. NEXUS
    NEXUS 23 November 2017 13: 49 New
    +8
    It seems to me alone that this device is very similar to Typhoon-U?
    1. destination
      destination 23 November 2017 13: 53 New
      +1
      But, I would say, more elegant, or something ... Still, their designers are better, I must say ... It's beautiful, what can I say ...
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS 23 November 2017 13: 56 New
        +6
        Quote: destination
        But, I would say, more elegant, or something ... Still, their designers are better, I must say ... It's beautiful, what can I say ...

        supposedly ensures the survival of personnel in a car when a mine is blown up weighing up to 150 kg»

        Why not just a ton?
        1. destination
          destination 23 November 2017 14: 10 New
          +2
          Yes, I'm not talking about the performance characteristics of esthetics, you know ... wink Ships here, for example, the Italian BEAUTIFUL descendants of Michelangelo draw, very beautifully, agree, in terms of pleasing to the eye ... hi
          1. NEXUS
            NEXUS 23 November 2017 14: 38 New
            +5
            Quote: destination
            the descendants of Michelangelo draw, very beautifully, agree, in terms of pleasing to the eye ...

            Well, yes ... but our equipment, although it looks like it was trimmed with an ax and finished with a rasp, but at the same time, it’s often our ugly ducklings who flaunt exhibitions and fight around the world.
            1. drunkram
              drunkram 23 November 2017 17: 09 New
              +4
              I disagree categorically. Russian technology is at least one of the most beautiful in the world, if not the most. In particular, aviation and ships of rank 1-2, tanks (T-90A, T-14, BMPT-90) and combat turntables, and even the Urals in general, are brutal bonneters and look very hostile and intimidating, and unlike this pepelats Typhoon-U can withstand real 8 kg and not virtual 150 kg
              1. NEXUS
                NEXUS 23 November 2017 18: 13 New
                +2
                Quote: drunkram
                I disagree categorically. Russian technology is at least one of the most beautiful in the world,

                It is debatable ... when developing weapons, our developers least of all thought about the form.
                Quote: drunkram
                In particular, aviation and ships of rank 1-2,

                I agree with this. We have beautiful planes and ships, you can’t argue here.
                Quote: drunkram
                tanks (T-90A, T-14, BMPT-90) and combat turntables,

                Well, about the T-14 (I'm talking about), this is a new technique ... and to take the T-72, especially the first versions ... it’s real that they cut out an ax, but this does not mean that 72 is a bad tank.
                Quote: drunkram
                and combat turntables

                Crocodile, let's not say the winner of a beauty contest. Functionality, vitality, and so on, yes ... here he is handsome, but the exterior, although predatory, is also not a mister of peace in terms of aesthetics.
                Quote: drunkram
                and unlike this pepelats Typhoon-U can withstand real 8 kg and not virtual 150 kg

                Wow ... but advertising is the engine of commerce. hi
                1. drunkram
                  drunkram 24 November 2017 16: 54 New
                  0
                  And I didn’t say that the creators sought beauty, it just happened by itself
          2. SERGUS
            SERGUS 24 November 2017 13: 20 New
            +1
            Quote: destination
            Italian BEAUTIFUL descendants of Michelangelo draw, very beautifully, agree, in terms of pleasing to the eye ...

            Guys, let's not forget that the main task of military equipment is to carry out the tasks assigned to it, everything else is not important.
        2. APASUS
          APASUS 23 November 2017 20: 14 New
          +1
          Quote: NEXUS
          Why not just a ton?

          I would like to see at least 100 kg. How will they smudge them there on the walls. And one more moment, it seems to me alone that it reminds me of some kind of self-made dog? Devices are not integrated into the driver’s panel, it will fly into his head with these devices, in which case
    2. siberalt
      siberalt 23 November 2017 14: 05 New
      +1
      If with bars on the windows, then it’s an avtozak. And do not shag grandmother.lol
  2. san4es
    san4es 23 November 2017 13: 52 New
    +6
    TITUS (Tactical Infantry Transport and Utility System)
    1. Jedi
      Jedi 23 November 2017 13: 57 New
      +3
      Sanya hi Thank you for the video. I would be surprised if you did not post the news accompaniment. wink
      1. san4es
        san4es 23 November 2017 14: 01 New
        +3
        ... Please ... So more clearly wink
  3. K-50
    K-50 23 November 2017 14: 04 New
    +1
    Again advertising posts. yes
    In the basic version, TITUS has a mass of empty 17 tons, but in the version with enhanced armor, the combat mass increases to 23 tons.

    During the Great Patriotic War, the fall of 50 kg of a bomb near the T-34 led to its capsule and this despite the fact that its “sailing” from the side was much lower, and the combat weight was 29 tons. And here is the “pipe higher and smoke thinner”, but for some reason it’s more stable with THREE TIMES DIRECTLY under the car, undermining.
    Miracles however. recourse sad laughing
  4. adma
    adma 23 November 2017 14: 04 New
    +3
    French technical genius. Senseless and merciless.
  5. igorka357
    igorka357 23 November 2017 14: 38 New
    +1
    100 kg landmine will tear this armored car to pieces, like any other .. laughing , haven’t yet come up with protection against a landmine with a 150 kg box, such tanks are being destroyed by tanks !!!
    1. Sergey53
      Sergey53 23 November 2017 14: 42 New
      0
      Enough and 6 kg.
  6. Nasty
    Nasty 23 November 2017 15: 01 New
    0
    Quote: destination
    But, I would say, more elegant, or something ... Still, their designers are better, I must say ... It's beautiful, what can I say ...

    Oh well, ours are better. But the driven rear wheels are + to the turning radius, although in general, it complicates the design and operation.
    1. Elephant
      Elephant 23 November 2017 16: 03 New
      0
      Unlike our engineers, the Chinese are already copying this model, along with French patents ...
  7. Black water
    Black water 23 November 2017 16: 06 New
    +1
    Quote: Nasty
    Quote: destination
    But, I would say, more elegant, or something ... Still, their designers are better, I must say ... It's beautiful, what can I say ...

    Oh well, ours are better. But the driven rear wheels are + to the turning radius, although in general, it complicates the design and operation.

    ... this is to turn around at the intersection and quickly leave the demonstrators .....
  8. drunkram
    drunkram 23 November 2017 17: 03 New
    +1
    ... 17 tons ...

    ... 23 tons.

    ensures the survival of personnel in a car when a high-explosive mass of up to 150 kg is blown up

    Storytellers are such storytellers, what kind of cross can we talk about if the pepelats has 9 tons per bridge and 500 hp ....
    1. dvina71
      dvina71 23 November 2017 18: 54 New
      +1
      Quote: drunkram
      what kind of cross can we talk about

      Patency is not directly related to power .. Example ..LUAZ..50l.s / .but crawled where a person could not pass .. Modern - Sherp. 3x cyl. Kubota .. power is also about that .. But finally his FIG knows what will stop ..
      Torque is affected by torque. The best engine with high throughput engine with high KM at low speeds. Power for sports cars.
  9. Normal ok
    Normal ok 23 November 2017 18: 13 New
    0
    Along the way, all countries are arming against one adversary - their own people. I feel happy days are waiting for us (((