Polish Defense Ministry Selects Submarine Supplier

55
The Minister of Defense of Poland, Anthony Matserevich, said that at present the agency is choosing a supplier of submarines. The main contenders are manufacturers from France, Germany and Sweden, reports RIA News.



The French proposal is very interesting, especially during the last month there have been very intensive consultations between the Ministry of Defense and the French side,
said Matserevich on Polish radio.

But we are also negotiating with Sweden and Germany. Their proposals are also very interesting. All three are on the table,
added the minister.

According to him, the decision will be made before the end of this year.

Matserevich explained that we are talking about "three or four" submarines. A prerequisite is their arming of cruise missiles.

These are the ships that will defend Poland effectively, therefore, an indispensable condition is that they should be equipped with cruise missiles, at least of medium range - up to a thousand kilometers,
galloping minister of defense.
  • http://www.globallookpress.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

55 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    23 November 2017 11: 42
    Take the french. They build quickly, though they may not give it away.
    1. +2
      23 November 2017 11: 47
      It is absolutely clear to everyone that the figure of the Minister of Defense of Poland, Anthony Matserevich, was specially selected and seated in a chair in order to perform the necessary functions. But at least they would pick up a person with a look appropriate to the minister, the same stupid person is complete, and this is very noticeable
      1. +3
        23 November 2017 11: 53
        And with a very silly expression. So I want to crack it.
        1. +2
          23 November 2017 12: 38
          And I spit.
          1. +6
            23 November 2017 13: 15
            Put him on a submarine and launch on a cruise missile, let him dream, Maybe I'm wrong, but the West has no nuclear submarines with cruise missiles.
            1. +1
              23 November 2017 22: 15
              Quote: Going
              The West has no nuclear submarines with cruise missiles.

              The Swedes are steadily correcting this "oversight." "A26" based on Stirling with 18 Tomahawks in 3's drum PUs. Because of Gotland, such a machine could threaten our coast ...
        2. 0
          23 November 2017 16: 50
          Quote: SHVEDsky_stol
          And with a very silly expression. So I want to crack it.

          The smart discusses the idea, the normal discusses the solution, the stupid discusses the personality. Today I do not want to deny myself the pleasure.
          For stupidity you will always find the mind, if you want to make out. Often stupidity is thinking (thinking!), Just outside our format. But there’s just a zombie talking head. I remembered, the city of Fools, Organchik ... Incidentally, he was also in the ranks.
    2. +2
      23 November 2017 11: 50
      Quote: Sergey53
      Take the french. They build quickly, though they may not give it away.

      Friends from Dill will build them!
      1. +2
        23 November 2017 11: 54
        yeah))) underwater shuttles))))
      2. +8
        23 November 2017 12: 09
        Quote: volodya
        Friends from Dill will build them!


        these can good
      3. +3
        23 November 2017 13: 36
        here both sides are “handsome”, “the French proposal is very interesting,” said Mazzarella, but if Uncle Sam wants to stuff his old stuff, Frenchmen’s fries will be thrown again with the contract, as it was with the turntables))
    3. +1
      23 November 2017 11: 51
      Matserevich needs to act in thrillers. Hitchcock is resting! belay
      1. +2
        23 November 2017 14: 33
        Yes, I already saw him in The Lord of the Rings, he was there in tatters, he caught a fish in a stream.
    4. 0
      23 November 2017 11: 56
      Quote: Sergey53
      Take the french.

      and they’ll take it, in spite of the Germans, although for me the Swedish are the best (fran-germ)
      1. 0
        23 November 2017 12: 40
        They will not take from the French for the reason that they managed with them on the refusal to purchase their air defense system. For the refusal of these to give us the Mistral.
    5. 0
      23 November 2017 12: 05
      What if the Russians take it? laughing The Turkish precedent for NATO with air defense systems is the place to be. Indeed, they really know that Russian weapons systems are the best.
      Then the silent scene will be like that of Nikolai Vasilievich in The Examiner sad
      1. 0
        23 November 2017 12: 20
        Quote: Pax tecum
        What if the Russians take it?

        for one thing that was said so loud they can be shot))) freedom of speech, all things))
      2. +3
        23 November 2017 13: 38
        it doesn’t work, at the Muscovite pl Polish crews will always be unwell due to psycho-genetic characteristics)))
    6. 0
      23 November 2017 12: 16
      Quote: Sergey53
      Take the french. They build quickly, though they may not give it away.

      They have already thrown the French with the purchase of Caracal turntables (to somehow compensate for the loss of the contract on the Mistral), they will also throw with the purchase of submarines ...
      Last year:
      Polish Foreign Minister Vitold Waszczykowski called on “not to hysteria” partners from Paris laughing due to Poland’s refusal to buy helicopters from France. This is a contract for the purchase of 50 H225M Caracal helicopters from Airbus Helicopters.
      “The current Polish government looks very scornfully at the European Union in general and France in particular”
      France, recall, won the tender, competing with Italian and American competitors. The deal was valued at more than $ 3 billion and was supposed to be one of the largest in the framework of the modernization of the Polish army. However, in August it became known about Poland’s intention to terminate the contract. On October 4, the Polish Ministry of Development officially announced its refusal to purchase helicopters. In Paris, however, the arguments of the Poles are considered far-fetched.
      1. +2
        23 November 2017 12: 38
        Quote: PSih2097
        They have already thrown the French with the purchase of Caracal turntables (to somehow compensate for the loss of the contract on the Mistral), they will also throw with the purchase of submarines ...

        And soon the French will pay them a price in order to cover losses with turntables, and even advance money. Yes
    7. +2
      23 November 2017 12: 24
      Quote: Sergey53
      Take the french. They build quickly, though they may not give it away.


      Antoshka, take the Argentinean ones, they are now in trend! Yes
    8. 0
      23 November 2017 13: 53
      Quote: Sergey53
      Take the french.

      no, German is better. Argentines can confirm.
    9. 0
      24 November 2017 06: 53
      Quote: Sergey53
      Take the french. They build quickly, though they may not give it away.

      And the Poles may not take it. Remember the story of the Mistrals and Caracal helicopters. Then the Poles said that they would refuse the order for helicopters if the Mistral went to Russia. So how did this story end? The Poles abandoned the French and canceled the order. Here is the news a year ago.
      https://rg.ru/2016/10/09/polsha-otkazalas-pokupat
      -french-vertolety.html
  2. +2
    23 November 2017 11: 44
    These are the ships that will defend Poland effectively, therefore, an indispensable condition is that they be equipped with cruise missiles, at least of medium range - up to a thousand kilometers

    belay And doesn’t such a range violate any agreement? what
    1. NKT
      +2
      23 November 2017 11: 45
      So it's not land based
      1. +2
        23 November 2017 12: 02
        Understood thanks.
      2. 0
        23 November 2017 12: 04
        Quote: NKT
        So it's not land based

        and if a tsunami boat is thrown ashore 2 km .... will it violate the contract? wassat
        1. +1
          23 November 2017 15: 12
          Quote: Burbon
          and if a tsunami boat is thrown ashore 2 km .... will it violate the contract?

          Yeah. So "Peter the Great" is better not to go into the Baltic Sea anymore. No need to rock ... the international environment laughing
  3. +1
    23 November 2017 11: 45
    What goat is the button accordion? If only Poland learned to swim)))
  4. +1
    23 November 2017 11: 48
    France, Germany and Sweden

    If I'm not mistaken, Germany has problems with its submarine fleet. The Swedes are great “specialists” in hunting for Russian submarines, so it’s better to order deep bombs and acoustics from them.
    An indispensable condition is that they be equipped with cruise missiles of at least medium range - up to a thousand kilometers,
    And why not immediately ask for nuclear warheads?
    1. +1
      23 November 2017 12: 03
      "If I'm not mistaken, Germany has problems with its submarine fleet" ////

      I don’t know ... They built great submarines for Israel.
      1. 0
        23 November 2017 12: 08
        They built great submarines for Israel.

        I'm not talking about the possibility of construction and technology, but about the submarine fleet that Germany has. Probably not enough for your money?
      2. +4
        23 November 2017 12: 20
        Quote: voyaka uh
        They built great submarines for Israel.

        They know how to build them, there are no questions, but now they themselves have no operational submarines in the fleet
        Shoemakers without boots. The Minister of Defense is a lady, so the cost of the aircraft went to zero ... From aviation - good if 40% on the wing, you won’t remember about tanks without tears (95 cars are now operational)
        I’m looking at the actions of this lady and thinking already a sinful thing - maybe fairy tales about 100500 German women raped by Soviet soldiers are not such fairy tales? And they liked it, and now here they are again ... inviting us?
        1. +2
          24 November 2017 20: 23
          Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
          I’m looking at the actions of this lady and thinking already a sinful thing - maybe fairy tales about 100500 German women raped by Soviet soldiers are not such fairy tales? And they liked it, and now here they are again ... inviting us?

          Nothing, after the lady, there will be something transgender at the head of the Bundeswehr, and this something will unconditionally and instantly solve all the petty-bourgeois Bundeswehr problems.
      3. +1
        23 November 2017 12: 45
        In Argentina, the missing submarine is just from Germany.
        1. +1
          23 November 2017 14: 46
          In Argentina, there may also be a bed on which
          sleeping argentinian. After a hearty dinner with a 3-kg steak, he definitely won’t wake up. smile
    2. +1
      23 November 2017 12: 05
      Quote: rotmistr60
      If I'm not mistaken, Germany has problems with its submarine fleet

      but for export they are working full time both day and night ... they promise the Jews a couple of boats to be thrown ....
  5. +2
    23 November 2017 11: 52
    Let them buy. Only more modern and more secret, and our friends in Poland will give us their characteristics and other secrets.
  6. +1
    23 November 2017 11: 56
    I almost jumped from such a photo of this scumbag opening the news.
    1. +1
      23 November 2017 12: 01
      Yeah ... a credible appearance would be on the board among our homeless people, only the suit must be removed.
  7. +1
    23 November 2017 12: 00
    But what about the Volyn massacre and Ukraine? Money nowhere to go? Or will they make a present to the Baltic Fleet? You still have to drown someone. wink
  8. 0
    23 November 2017 12: 01
    Quote: Sergey53
    Take the french. They build quickly, though they may not give it away.

    Give re-equipment of Egypt at reasonable prices!
    And we need technology .. then .. quietly ...
  9. 0
    23 November 2017 12: 16
    skaкAl Minister of Defense.

    Something from Ukraine infected?
    1. 0
      23 November 2017 12: 46
      Why not get infected? Neighbors after all.
    2. 0
      23 November 2017 16: 25
      Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
      Something from Ukraine infected?

      Why do you offend the Poles? Poland strong. They have their own long traditions with liberum veto and other inability to balance desires with possibilities. It is rather the opposite. Russian birds bitten and they turned into Ukrainians. laughing
  10. +1
    23 November 2017 13: 17
    In Germany, do not take ........., and then Argentina bought, and now - lost, can not find ......
  11. +1
    23 November 2017 13: 20
    With such a minister, they don’t need to look for a submarine, but a doctor for the brain for Macherevich!
  12. 0
    23 November 2017 15: 00
    Polish submarine forces- a new joke.
  13. +1
    23 November 2017 15: 27
    If the prerequisite of the Kyrgyz Republic, then only "Scorpene" with NCM (Naval Cruise Missile), 1000 km. and the French agree to lend only in conjunction with a submarine (the Israelis, of course, will not give the Popeye Turbo to the German submarines, for which the problem is not at the technical level, but in the state’s long-term attitude to the defense and motivation of the Germans to serve ...)
  14. +2
    23 November 2017 15: 27
    They say that in order to ruin a small country, she needs to sell an aircraft carrier, and that’s enough submarines.
  15. 0
    23 November 2017 20: 33
    Polish Minister of Defense Anthony Matserevich said that the department is currently choosing a supplier of submarines

    I just read the beginning and I know for the previous winner Who can Antoni Matserevich choose? Well, not Russian
  16. 0
    23 November 2017 23: 51
    Quote: BoA KAA
    Quote: Going
    The West has no nuclear submarines with cruise missiles.

    The Swedes are steadily correcting this "oversight." "A26" based on Stirling with 18 Tomahawks in 3's drum PUs. Because of Gotland, such a machine could threaten our coast ...

    And the Germans supply Israel with boats that can also shoot cruise missiles

    Quote: Warrior with a machine gun
    here both sides are “handsome”, “the French proposal is very interesting,” said Mazzarella, but if Uncle Sam wants to stuff his old stuff, Frenchmen’s fries will be thrown again with the contract, as it was with the turntables))

    Well, call me, dear, what old junk in the form of diesel submarines does the USA have?

    Quote: Jedi
    These are the ships that will defend Poland effectively, therefore, an indispensable condition is that they be equipped with cruise missiles, at least of medium range - up to a thousand kilometers

    belay And doesn’t such a range violate any agreement? what

    No, it does not break.

    Quote: NKT
    So it's not land based

    Yes, even if they were land-based they still do not violate
  17. 0
    24 November 2017 06: 53
    The last three words in the article. Where to stress in one of them?
  18. 0
    24 November 2017 09: 31
    What a sprightly this Matserevich
  19. 0
    25 November 2017 10: 51
    But what about the pride of noble panov- winged cavalry ?? Not trending ??
    Then, to announce a tender for the SSBN, it is necessary
    In Gdansk or Pig-farm they have a place

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"