TSAMTO presents original archival documents about the Battle of Stalingrad

The press service of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation reports that TSAMTO (the central archive of the main defense department) has submitted archival documents describing the course of the Battle of Stalingrad. Among the submissions - documentation for the period summer 1942 - February 1943. All documents are exhibited in the Central Museum of the Great Patriotic War as part of the conference “The Battle of Stalingrad. On the 75 anniversary of the Soviet counteroffensive at Stalingrad. "

Department of Information MO RF cites the comment of the representative of TsAMTO Victoria Konyaeva:

Among the documents submitted, the combat report of the commander of the Stalingrad Front from 24 August 1942 about the heavy bombardment of Stalingrad, which reports a completely burnt down town center, as well as buildings of the Regional Committee, telegraph, House of Books and many others, is of undoubted interest. The report addressed to Stalin lists the factories affected by the bombing, and also said that the city was left without a main source of water.

It is noted that the landmark documents of the exhibition include the report of the commander of the Don Front, Colonel-General (at that time) Konstantin Rokossovsky to the Headquarters of January 31 from 1943. The report reported the capture of Field Marshal Paulus. The report is a personal signature of Konstantin Rokossovsky.

Comments

[Mountain shooter]

Authentic archival documents ... Absolutely "killer" for visionaries from history ...
It’s boring - it’s genuine to read documents ... It’s much more interesting and more convenient for a “correct worldview” to come up with facts and interpret them ... But after all, this practice, whose quintessence is Solzhenitsyn, was “winning” due to the secrecy of archives, now what ? By inertia continue?

[Vladimir16]

The Information Department of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation cites the comment of the representative of TsAMTO Victoria Konyaeva:

Commenting instead of a real document is cruel! This phrase in this comment is alarming:

The report addressed to Stalin lists the factories affected by the bombing, and also says that the city was left without a main source of water.

The Volga did not seem to dry up ... I suspect that the "commentator": something did not understand or did not read carefully.
Why not publish an excerpt from a true document? Why the hell do you need this commentator? Who is she? War veteran? At the "extreme" is she even a historian?

[antivirus]

only a joint demonstration with the archives of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Internal Affairs will give a complete picture (maybe also the Center for Party Archives?) POLICIES AND CONDITIONS IN WHICH THE USSR SURVIVED

[Nasrat]

244 photos of the Battle of Stalingrad:

https://aloban75.livejournal.com/564228.html

continued:

http://aloban75.livejournal.com/563999.html

[Nasrat]

And on the topic archival documents:

Documentary publication "How the Polish armed underground" helped "the Red Army to defeat Nazi Germany. 1944-1945. "

http://archives.ru/library/poland-1944-1945/catal
ogue.shtml

[Vend]

Quote: Mountain Shooter

Authentic archival documents ... Absolutely "killer" for visionaries from history ...
It’s boring - it’s genuine to read documents ... It’s much more interesting and more convenient for a “correct worldview” to come up with facts and interpret them ... But after all, this practice, whose quintessence is Solzhenitsyn, was “winning” due to the secrecy of archives, now what ? By inertia continue?

Secret documents on the Great Patriotic War should not remain at all. And from boring documents, you can create interesting historical articles.

[A. Privalov]

Authentic archival documents ... Absolutely "killer" for visionaries from history ...

You are certainly right. However, what is there about these documents that they had to be kept secret for 75 years?

[Herculesic]

It’s good that we do not allow all the “news” to further falsify the lie about this or that battle, because if such liars were poked with a snout into the undermines, especially from secret archives earlier, they would have nothing to lie. But the country’s history is one, written by the blood of millions of lives, and rewriting it in their own interests is sacrilege over the country. !!!!

[Deck]

Secret archives! About war! What are we hiding? Crimes of the Nazis? Or something else. maybe we want to fix something in history
P, S. Dear Herculesych, please check the spelling, otherwise unnecessary associations with a fifth-grader will come and this will reduce the pathos of speech. No offense.

[rotmistr60]

Perhaps it’s worth sending copies to the school that has become famous, they may find time to read (if they do not ask me to translate into German).

[Altona]

Documents from which died "innocent and did not want to fight," Georgians, Juliuses, Dietrich and other fascist cattle actually published? Or will there be trash again about the "terrible Soviet captivity"?

[antivirus]

Or will there be trash again about the "terrible Soviet captivity"?

- "but I will not be silent here either: Comrades, they don’t report meat to the tiger!"
Well said the boy, the main thing is his mentors. These are our peers. And not even enemies, including other Bandera.

[Altona]

Quote: antivirus

Well said the boy, the main thing is his mentors. These are our peers. And not even enemies, including other Bandera.

-----------------------------------
He is no longer a boy, and his mentors are not fools. He said. Not him, but it is rootless. If necessary, I will talk about it every day. We have about the “innocently killed” citizen of the king almost every day myrrh-streaming, posters hung out “forgive us, sir.”

[Stegosaurus Brontosaurus]

Quote: Vladimir16

The Volga did not seem to dry up ... I suspect that the "commentator": something did not understand or did not read carefully.
... At the "extreme" is she even a historian?

Water is not only a drink. It is needed for a variety of needs.

[1536]

And what is TSAMTO? The Central Archive of the Ministry of Defense has a different abbreviation: TSAMO. TSAMTO is the Center for the Analysis of the World Arms Trade, judging by a request on the Internet. So who provided the documents? And how much can significant events be leveled because of such trifles?