Jacob Kedmi told why the United States is afraid of Russia

November 21, 2017 19

An Israeli political expert, the former head of the Nativ secret service, Yakov Kedmi, explained why Turkey will never leave the North Atlantic Alliance. Kedmi also told what the United States is striving for militarily, what technologies are being developed and what Russia can oppose to this.

19 comments

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

solzh

+2

21 November 2017 19: 40

Kedmi is right, the Americans are very afraid of our ballistic missiles, and as long as we have deterrence weapons they will not attack, unless they modify or create something new from the category of global strike.
1. NEXUS
  
  +3
  
  21 November 2017 21: 39
  
  Quote: solzh
  Kedmi is right, Americans are very afraid of our ballistic missiles
  
  And not only ICBMs, but also new missile launchers such as the X-102. And now they are already working on the creation of an extended-range cruise missile. And if the X-102 has a range of up to 5000 km, then this missile launcher, it is believed, will have a range of at least 7000 km, that is, we are talking about intercontinental distances.
  1. Siberia 9444
    
    0
    
    26 November 2017 05: 35
    
    And you need to get out of START 3, that is, increase the number of warheads! START3 is a US trick to destroy all our warheads (buses) with a global strike, and if there are many of them, then the very meaning of the global strike is lost.
Kleber

0

21 November 2017 19: 51

He didn’t discover anything new. The arms race will always be and only the apocalypse will stop it.
1. racha4
  
  0
  
  26 November 2017 16: 00
  
  Weapons are always in price. If demand falls, mattresses fuel a new military conflict. Business is nothing personal!
MOSKVITYANIN

+2

21 November 2017 20: 35
About tankers, Soloviev correctly said ...
sabakina

+3

21 November 2017 22: 33

Jacob said they would be in the center of Russia. I looked at the map, it is somewhere in the region of the river. Yenisei. Will they get there for sure?
1. MOSKVITYANIN
  
  +2
  
  21 November 2017 22: 46
  
  You can forgive him like that, he never was in the non-chernozem zone of Russia, and even more so in the area of the river. Yenisei ... in the courtyard of the house would not leave bridges ...
  Yes, and our neighbors to match us the same scumbags, not a bad thing ...
2. NEXUS
  
  +2
  
  22 November 2017 02: 28
  
  Quote: sabakina
  Jacob said they would be in the center of Russia. I looked at the map, it is somewhere in the region of the river. Yenisei. Will they get there for sure?
  
  With a breakthrough, it’s very, very fast ... today we don’t have a deep echeloned defense infrastructure. Why? And what kind of idiots will get to fight a nuclear power?
  1. MOSKVITYANIN
    
    +1
    
    22 November 2017 07: 29
    
    Quote: NEXUS
    Upon a breakthrough, very, very quickly ...
    
    What forces and means? What are the groups of NATO troops that are capable of this and are located on the borders of the Russian Federation?
    1. Aaron Zawi
      
      +1
      
      22 November 2017 07: 43
      
      Quote: MOSKVITYANIN
      Quote: NEXUS
      Upon a breakthrough, very, very quickly ...
      
      What forces and means? What are the groups of NATO troops that are capable of this and are located on the borders of the Russian Federation?
      
      Well, for example, almost 100 serviceable tanks remained in the Bundeswehr. And in the UK no less than 100. Why, power.
  2. Boa kaa
    
    +2
    
    25 November 2017 22: 32
    
    Quote: NEXUS
    Today we do not have a deep layered defense infrastructure.
    
    Colleague! In the yard 21 century! What "deep layered defense infrastructure" in a maneuver war without a clearly defined front line, when the entire territory of the country and its entire economy, to the entire depth, are the object of a blow from the opposite side!?
    Maybe you talked about missile defense / air defense? So here, except for the SPRN facilities, we have nothing stationary. Everything is movable and maneuverable! Even ICBMs are located at our PGRK ...
    So, we will assume that you have incorrectly expressed your thought.
    Best regards,
vlad007

0

22 November 2017 10: 09

Mattress makers will operate with cyber weapons and will be more painful, unfortunately. No one is interested and does not need to travel on tanks across endless expanses, it is enough to disable communication and communication facilities.
1. Vadim Sh.
  
  0
  
  22 November 2017 21: 28
  
  They won’t fight at all, there’s not enough spirit, they can only with countries like Guinea Bessau, and then at a distance of the Kyrgyz Republic’s flight, because you can bomb with impunity, or they can fly from others.
Signalman17

0

23 November 2017 04: 49

Quote: Vadim Sh.
They won’t fight at all, there’s not enough spirit, they can only with countries like Guinea Bessau, and then at a distance of the Kyrgyz Republic’s flight, because you can bomb with impunity, or they can fly from others.

Ghfdbkmyj? r fvthjd
Quote: Vadim Sh.
They won’t fight at all, there’s not enough spirit, they can only with countries like Guinea Bessau, and then at a distance of the Kyrgyz Republic’s flight, because you can bomb with impunity, or they can fly from others.

That's right, the Americans are fighting from a cup to the next coffee, flew out, bombed anywhere and vice versa ...
Salia Messer

+1

23 November 2017 07: 48

Americans are not afraid of anyone or anything because of their apparent superiority and narcissism. But they are happy to portray this fear in order to go on the offensive. To kill to exclamations - "Sentry, they are killing us!" much more impressive.
Alexander Shilov_2

+1

25 November 2017 18: 43

Oddly enough, Yasha, but in the new century, humanity under the leadership of the United States crawled to die! Democracy has no future and the destruction of 7 billion will not help the Freemasons. They do not have God's spark and they will die out even by winning. And you done! Such assistance to Russia is very necessary because it is here and now that the issue of being or not being is being decided.
NicolasFrench

0

25 November 2017 22: 54

Constantly I keep it BETTER TO BE A GIRL WITH STEEL FEATHER THAN A FAT TURKEY ON ANOTHER TABLE !!! But who is burning with desire from Western warriors to shed blood for the Yankees? Germans ? so they were taught more than once. Spaniards? Italians? I’ll believe the hats. Well, the Baltic states. And the ns themselves love to fight with the wrong hands and with a weak enemy. So Kedmi went too far ..........
Valery Bolbot

0

30 November 2017 18: 07

But is Israel also very afraid of the superpower Russia?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"