Military Review

Nebenzia: US allegations of Russian support for the Taliban - is utterly absurd

14
UN Resident Representative Vasily Nebenzya commented on reports by Western sources that Russia allegedly supports the Taliban militants (* banned in the Russian Federation) in Afghanistan. According to the Russian diplomat, such accusations fit into the overall Western concept of a disinformation campaign launched against the Russian Federation. RIA News gives the text of the statement of the Russian Permanent Representative:
We consider that a deliberately launched information campaign on the unsubstantiated accusation of our country in supporting the Taliban (*), including their funding and regular deliveries, is unacceptable. weapons. We see this as an attempt to shift the blame from a sick head to a healthy one. Russia has consistently and systematically advocated the retraining of the Taliban movement (*) to a terrorist group, which would exclude the possibility of mitigating the criminal prosecution of its members.



According to Vasily Nebenzi, Russia continues to insist on such an approach in order to eliminate “loopholes” in international legislation that allow terrorists to escape responsibility.

Nebenzia: US allegations of Russian support for the Taliban - is utterly absurd


Recall that earlier, US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson announced that Russia was allegedly supplying weapons to the Taliban militants (*). At the Russian Foreign Ministry, Tillerson’s statements called the “utter absurdity” and advised to better observe where and to whom the United States themselves supply weapons, repeatedly “Overshot in Syria” when dumping containers with weapons. In those cases, American weapons were in the hands of ISIS militants (* banned in the Russian Federation). Now with this American weapon, igilovtsy reached the north of Afghanistan.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
14 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. 210ox
    210ox 21 November 2017 06: 29 New
    +3
    Or maybe it really is necessary? In Amerzian, despite the fact that they shot at us .. The enemy of my enemy is my friend?
    1. siberalt
      siberalt 21 November 2017 06: 35 New
      +2
      And who will listen or read Nebenzyu, if the others were the first to say the opposite? Here, as in sports, whoever is the first has won. lol
      1. Going
        Going 21 November 2017 08: 18 New
        +8
        This fuss at the UN has always been, just not covered so widely, and there were no such technological capabilities as it is now.
        1. pjastolov
          pjastolov 21 November 2017 09: 03 New
          +3
          Quote: Going
          This fuss at the UN has always been

          they want to see what is not - and do not see what is actually
    2. Nyrobsky
      Nyrobsky 21 November 2017 10: 30 New
      0
      Quote: 210ox
      Or maybe it really is necessary? In Amerzian, despite the fact that they shot at us .. The enemy of my enemy is my friend?

      There were no Taliban then. Nevertheless, they shot at us, as they shoot at the Americans today. Only now in Afghanistan there are many who say that now they would not shoot at Shuravi. On the other hand, you are right - why shouldn't we, in the image of the USA, look for “moderate” Taliban to counter the spread of ISIS?
  2. Ankipelgygyrgyn
    Ankipelgygyrgyn 21 November 2017 06: 32 New
    +4
    Interestingly, if we hypothetically imagine that the Taliban had established arms supplies at the level of supplies to dushmans in the 80s, how long would they take the amers out of Afghanistan?
    1. Orionvit
      Orionvit 21 November 2017 06: 58 New
      +2
      Quote: Ankypelgygyrgyn
      how long will they take amers out of Afghanistan?

      You somewhat misunderstand the modern tactics of war from the United States. The states have not fought for a long time, as practice shows, in a traditional battle they are not very. Modern wars, they “win”, either by bombing, that is, remotely, without direct contact with the enemy, or they are stupidly buying. And when asked by the Americans, like: “Have you won the war anywhere?”, You can hear the strange answer: “Of course we won, we bought it.” Amazing things are happening in the modern world.
  3. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 21 November 2017 06: 34 New
    +1
    This absurdity has been going on for several months and obviously not in vain. Most likely, Americans expect a possible disclosure of their direct ties with the Taliban, therefore, by an ingrained habit, they are already transferring arrows to Russia.
    1. Going
      Going 21 November 2017 08: 19 New
      +7
      The United States is setting the stage as a safety net, for another reason, to strengthen sanctions against Russia.
  4. Stegosaurus Brontosaurus
    Stegosaurus Brontosaurus 21 November 2017 06: 58 New
    0
    But on the other hand, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said that
    Moscow has no actual evidence of any conspiracy between the Western coalition and IG


    http://anna-news.info/lavrov-u-nas-net-dokazatels
    tv-sgovora-ig-i-ssha /
  5. Herculesic
    Herculesic 21 November 2017 07: 13 New
    0
    Now, if the Taliban would help the United States Indian fight for their independence and the expulsion of foreigners from their ancestral lands, then Russia would support both the Indians and the Taliban in the fight against American dishonesty!
  6. solzh
    solzh 21 November 2017 09: 29 New
    +1
    How is it in American, to blame from a bad mind to a healthy one. So the Americans will introduce new sanctions.
  7. aszzz888
    aszzz888 21 November 2017 09: 49 New
    0
    Permanent Representative to the UN Vasily Nebenzya commented on reports from Western sources
    ... what nerves you need to have to calmly talk with the insane .. request
  8. NordUral
    NordUral 21 November 2017 14: 04 New
    0
    And the idea is very interesting. These guys will deal with drugs, and with the barbarons, that local, because of the puddle.