Under Astrakhan, C-400 crews shot at Boar

68
In the Astrakhan region, on the Kapustin Yar proving ground, anti-aircraft gunners from the Eastern Military District carried out combat launches of missiles from the C-400 Triumph complex.

The calculations successfully carried out missile launches on one of the most difficult targets, the Boar, which moves along a ballistic flat trajectory. Combat shooting at the Kaban target became the final stage of retraining military personnel of the Okrug’s air defense forces to new missile systems
- it is spoken in the official report of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation.

Under Astrakhan, C-400 crews shot at Boar


Note that the upgraded target missile "Kaban" is equipped with a new powder engine with a large specific impulse, which increased its speed of flight. Boar has a starting mass of 330 kilograms and can fly at a speed of 830-1300 meters per second along a ballistic trajectory with a maximum height from 31 to 50 kilometers to a distance of 107 kilometers within 180-220 seconds.

In addition, the rocket has an effective reflective surface in the wavelength range of 3-10 centimeters. The target is also equipped with equipment, which, even when the rocket rotates, gives steady information to the command center about the missile miss parameters.

After the completion of combat shooting, anti-aircraft gunners carried out the loading of new equipment on railway platforms and marched to the point of permanent deployment in Primorye. Anti-aircraft missile systems C-400 "Triumph" will take over combat duty at the beginning of 2018, reports RG-Force.
68 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    20 November 2017 19: 00
    So we finished, our anti-aircraft defense, "boar" crying lol !
    1. +6
      20 November 2017 19: 04
      Quote: Herkulesich
      So we finished, our anti-aircraft defense, "boar

      I can imagine how his "relatives" abroad were saddened ....
      1. +5
        20 November 2017 19: 08
        The name "Triumph" is loud, but I would like confirmation in battle ... Somewhere in Syria, etc.!
        Assad has been asking for a long time to close the sky of Syria!
        1. +5
          20 November 2017 19: 11
          Quote: DEPARTMENT-M4
          Assad has been asking for a long time to close the sky of Syria!

          We are not yet ready for a general war to do this. So, alas ...
          1. +5
            20 November 2017 19: 17
            Quote: svp67
            Quote: DEPARTMENT-M4
            Assad has been asking for a long time to close the sky of Syria!

            We are not yet ready for a general war to do this. So, alas ...

            Taking a deep and deep breath, Sergey, but I agree with you ... Of course, we are not ready yet, but work is still being done in this direction! They reckon with Russia and even fear it .. soldier
        2. +3
          20 November 2017 19: 40
          Quote: DEPARTMENT-M4
          but I would like confirmation in battle ... Somewhere in Syria, etc.!

          Are there suicides in the world? The parameters of the "wild boar" are impressive. The vaunted Raptor do not hold out much. And finally there are no such pepelats to 3.8M figachat
          1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +3
        20 November 2017 19: 13
        capable of flying at a speed of 830-1300 meters per second

        Not enough to simulate an ICBM. The ICBM flies along the trajectory with the apogee of 1000-1500 km and reaches a speed of 7 km / s at a decrease.
        1. +3
          20 November 2017 19: 31
          About the interception of ICBMs it is clear that the conversation is not going on. Interesting to intercept
          Is she a Scud or a Point in combat?
          1. +8
            20 November 2017 19: 43
            Quote: voyaka uh
            Interesting to intercept
            Is she a Scud or a Point in combat?

            laughing No, they will not intercept. Why offend your own? And Pershing or Jericho1 - completely. And for what purpose are you interested in?
            1. +3
              20 November 2017 19: 49
              Quote: Monos
              And Pershing or Jericho1 - quite


              Oh, not a fact at all.
              1. +8
                20 November 2017 19: 52
                Quote: Viktorfi
                Oh, not a fact at all.

                smile You have the opportunity to check ... in Syria. Try to gasp for Hmeimim.
                1. +2
                  20 November 2017 20: 56
                  Quote: Monos
                  You have the opportunity to check ... in Syria


                  We still have time to check in Syria ...


                  Quote: Monos
                  Try to gasp for Hmeimim.


                  And you try to crave for the USA in Syria wink
                  1. +9
                    20 November 2017 21: 04
                    Quote: Viktorfi
                    And you try to crave for the USA in Syria

                    And who knows, they might be withered. After all, they are not visible and it is not possible to bring down penguins with pterodactyls. In general, Ours will never admit that they shot down, and the Yankees will never admit that they were shot down. Parityshche - the guarantee of Peace in the World bully
                  2. +8
                    20 November 2017 21: 04
                    Quote: Viktorfi
                    And you try to crave for the USA in Syria

                    And whom do you think we are rolling out there? It is the American mercenaries. smile
                    1. +1
                      20 November 2017 21: 42
                      Quote: Monos
                      And whom do you think we are rolling out there? It is the American mercenaries


                      Probably in your fantasies. The last time Assad hit the rebels in the area where Assad did not have the right to succumb, the United States gave him a good hand and he didn’t climb anymore. I remember a couple of corpses wink

                      Don't flatter yourself lol
                      1. +9
                        20 November 2017 21: 53
                        Quote: Viktorfi
                        The last time Assad hit the rebels in the area where Assad did not have the right to succumb, the United States gave him a good hand and he didn’t climb anymore.

                        This blah blah about what? Americans bypass us and, unlike you, are well aware of the capabilities of C-400. Therefore, they fly aside. smile We are not used to flattering ourselves at all. On the contrary - we scold. And what is it that hooked you, my dear? Really still you can’t recover from our drone, which put your air defense on your ears? laughing
                  3. +4
                    20 November 2017 21: 35
                    And you try to crave for the USA in Syria

                    Gentlemen, so you will first get .....
                    Israel burn from 10-12 minutes. to utter destruction, unlike Russia .....
                    1. 0
                      20 November 2017 21: 42
                      Quote: Solomon Kane
                      Israel burn from 10-12 minutes. to utter destruction, unlike Russia .....


                      It seems easier for you to burn longer laughing
                      1. +2
                        20 November 2017 21: 45
                        ... Apparently, it’s easier for you to burn longer.
                        ,
                        regardless of the size of the territory, the outcome for all is sad ...... crying
              2. +2
                20 November 2017 20: 28
                Quote: Viktorfi
                Oh, not a fact at all.

                Why not a fact? Pershing is an obsolete rocket. It is followed from the start and slows down to select a target. Lubrication is almost impossible. A competent officer pointing at a lobeshnik, at the expense of one he will plant without straining. Nowadays, flying time for medium-sized missiles over 15 minutes is nothing
          2. +4
            20 November 2017 19: 56
            Quote: voyaka uh
            Will she intercept Scud or Point in combat?

            They wrote that in the Donbass "Point" was intercepted by Buk M2, which is quite possible with the support of RTV. And we have 2 tracking stations put on the division. So, for a sweet soul, he shatters without additional help
            1. +3
              20 November 2017 21: 24
              The exercises always know where the target will fly from and along which path. In reality, the conditions are not so ideal. I am waiting for India to acquire the S-400. They are
              They like to test purchased equipment (or which has been put out to tender) at their training grounds and with their targets (usually military missiles). Then the anti-missile capabilities of the S-400 will be clear.
              1. +1
                20 November 2017 21: 37
                Quote: voyaka uh
                The exercises always know where the target will fly from and along which path. In reality, the conditions are not so ideal.

                Pancake. Kakakya annoyance. We FSE no like people. During the exercises, they’ll kill you with radio-electronic warfare and hell will help. It’s one on one, and the DB is beautiful, they’ll even tell you where the attack and the starting place are from, when and to whom “bread and salt” to be served in the barrel. You can bring the station into combat readiness foot by foot and even look into the boutiques for eclairs recourse
                1. +3
                  21 November 2017 00: 10
                  It was previously reported that an unknown plane violated airspace over the border of the states of California and Oregon. At the same time, the incident that occurred on October 25 became known only now. Civilian pilots said the facility flew at a speed of almost 700 km / h at an altitude of ten kilometers, approaching aircraft by 20 km. The fighters did not have time to intercept the object, it disappeared

                  So where are the vaunted air defense and air force systems?
                  Gentlemen, Jews praise Patriot not because he is good, ..... but because they (Jews) bought it from the USA and put it in their arsenal ....
                  In this context, the gentlemen of the Jews can only reconcile and look for flaws in the Russian S-400, as compensation for moral costs ....
              2. +1
                20 November 2017 21: 55
                By the way, for those who doubt the ability to intercept the Stealth using the S-400. What is not a Stealth Boar? EPR in the see range 0,02-0,06 m2.
                1. +1
                  20 November 2017 22: 43
                  in stealth, the problem is not interception, but detection - after the radar of the circular view detects it - consider it already downed because the radar of guidance and target designation is much more powerful sensitive and selective - launch and salvage.
                  In the BR there is no particular problem in detection, but the problem is in interception - there is little time for interception - the range and height of interception are usually limited and are calculated at 10 km. Well, and you should not forget that there are restrictions on the speed of interception of the target.
                  1. +2
                    20 November 2017 23: 23
                    in stealth, the problem is not interception, but detection

                    and Vojaka claims that the F-35 radars, in principle, can’t see, even right above the radar they can’t see the flying one and that’s it, that’s just why the Jews took it
                    1. +1
                      21 November 2017 09: 55
                      Well, when they create it from cardboard sticks and shit then it will be like you say, but for now, the signal from such carts is reflected and reflected to its full height - a matter of distance and power.
                  2. 0
                    20 November 2017 23: 50
                    Quote: Yarhann
                    in stealth, the problem is not interception, but detection

                    Uncle. Tell us, when did you serve in the air defense ?. In fact, the opposite is true. It’s not difficult to detect, to intercept - 6 missiles on target, instead of two, as of 1990, now. It’s not a problem to land any “invisible! Ashtray” with one rocket. Well, we’re very hard to blame, for this reason. Fill the boar and any enemy ashtray. This is the difference between 3 seconds and 3 minutes hi
                2. +2
                  20 November 2017 22: 50
                  Quote: _Jack_
                  What is not a Stealth Boar? EPR in the see range 0,02-0,06 m2.

                  The Americans say that their stealth is 0,0001 m2
                  Well, not visible. I’ll close my left eye - I see, my right one - I also see. Both - I do not see. This is me, I’m pretending, or how
                  1. 0
                    20 November 2017 23: 08
                    The Americans say that their stealth is 0,0001 m2


                    well, it's overkill. In reality, the epr of a “simple” fighter was taken in the calculation of 3 square meters. m All tricks (shape, material, clearances) can be reduced by 5 times. Well, 0.5 sq. M. By the way, a 5-fold reduction in EPR is a decrease in range by one and a half times. This is closer to reality.
                    1. 0
                      21 November 2017 01: 48
                      Why bust? The coating absorbs the radar waves, but does not reflect them.
                      There are no reflected waves, there is no object of observation smile
                      And there can be many zeros (translated into M2). If, next to the F-22, a steel ball the size of a ball from a pin pong is launched to fly at the same speed at the same speed, then both objects will have the same size for the radar.
                      1. +1
                        21 November 2017 07: 35
                        The coating absorbs the radar waves, but does not reflect them.


                        The thickness of this coating (with 100% absorption wink ) will be commensurate with the wavelength, that's the trouble. Reductions are achieved mainly due to the elimination of "shiny" points - right angles, edges, crevices, rational reflection (rather than scattering). They even came up with a program - remember the radar along the route and not be substituted with a "bad" angle. And your tennis ball is an advertising trick, if only because in the 3cm range its reflection will be resonant.
                      2. 0
                        21 November 2017 19: 14
                        and 2 square cm. same pin-pong ball than Boar not Stealth by EPR?
              3. 0
                21 November 2017 11: 04
                At our exercises in Sary-Shagan, a soldier with a radio station was sitting near the launch sites of the targets and reported))))
    2. 0
      20 November 2017 19: 45
      Who said that wild boars as well as crocodiles do not fly ..?
      Quote: Herkulesich
      So we finished, our anti-aircraft defense, "boar" crying lol !
    3. 0
      20 November 2017 20: 41
      Meaning BBO will go.
      1. +1
        20 November 2017 22: 23
        apparently 1 of 4 ZRP will shipyard "Star" cover
        1. 0
          21 November 2017 00: 31
          That I think, such a strategic object, they have been covering for a long time, perhaps they covered it before with the help of the S-300.
  2. +11
    20 November 2017 19: 05
    I supplement the article with a photo of this same "Boar". I can not stand without photos or video news.
  3. 0
    20 November 2017 19: 06
    The height, probably in meters, is indicated at the Boar, and not in kilometers?
    1. +2
      20 November 2017 19: 09
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      The height, probably in meters, is indicated at the Boar, and not in kilometers?

      Why? For a ballistic missile is quite normal. Her engine works only on top, and down she already ....
  4. +2
    20 November 2017 19: 07

    Rocket target 96M6M "Boar".

    It looks like an ordinary shell from MLRS
    1. +2
      20 November 2017 19: 12
      Quote: APASUS
      It looks like an ordinary shell from MLRS

      Only if upgraded, since the plumage is rigid, not folding.
      Very similar to a meteorological rocket.

  5. +2
    20 November 2017 19: 52
    Boar target rocket


    Well, what is the name of the target? They would call it "Raptor" .... maybe someone understood something.
    1. 0
      20 November 2017 20: 02
      Quote: Kleber
      They would call it "Raptor" .... maybe someone understood something.

      What's the difference....
      - And will you play under the Game?
      - By Game I Will.
      - Fedya, Game
  6. 0
    20 November 2017 19: 56
    need to add boar petya
  7. +5
    20 November 2017 20: 00
    Characteristics of the Boar target rocket
    1. +3
      20 November 2017 20: 15
      Quote: Alexander War
      Characteristics of the Boar target rocket

      ... and launch soldier
      ... Hi Sanya.
      1. +2
        20 November 2017 20: 15
        Hi namesake drinks
        1. +2
          20 November 2017 20: 18
          Check out Kamaz
          1. +3
            20 November 2017 20: 30
            Quote: Alexander War
            Check out Kamaz

            good ... WAR gaming? .. wink
            1. +2
              20 November 2017 20: 33
              Office http://twower.livejournal.com/689934.html
      2. +2
        20 November 2017 20: 22
        We have a lot of targets!
        1. +2
          20 November 2017 20: 33
          Quote: Alexander War
          We have a lot of targets!

          ... All decommissioned BC from air defense systems soldier
          1. +2
            20 November 2017 20: 34
            There are brand new target missiles
      3. +1
        20 November 2017 21: 30
        And where are the intercepts themselves? Only target launches are shown.
        1. +3
          20 November 2017 21: 54
          Quote: voyaka uh
          And where are the intercepts themselves ?.

          ... High, far ... in near space (not visible) soldier
        2. 0
          20 November 2017 22: 28
          I'll tell you a secret. Wild boars are intercepted by 125 complex and in Lobeshnik. Only shh. Great secret. They are already in our scrap
    2. +1
      20 November 2017 22: 29
      type of image intensifier tube like that of the F-22 Raptor,
      F-22 have no chances
  8. +8
    20 November 2017 20: 01
    “The calculations successfully carried out missile launches along one of the most difficult targets, the Boar, which moves along a ballistic lay trajectory. Combat firing on the target "Boar" was the final stage of retraining of the air defense troops of the district to new missile systems


    Well done fellows, and those who have doubts let them guess.
  9. +6
    20 November 2017 20: 03
    A wild boar is good, but not whether we can also aim at the Eagle.
  10. 0
    20 November 2017 22: 28
    In addition, the rocket has an effective reflective surface in the wavelength range of 3-10 centimeters.
    smart phrase))))) Understand how you want) Whether it’s the EPR of the target, or the wavelength of radiation))))
    1. 0
      21 November 2017 05: 08
      Not an article, but a collection of "mistakes"! Add here another “ballistic flat trajectory” and reading becomes simply unpleasant and insulting for illiterate formulations.
  11. +1
    21 November 2017 04: 48
    The calculations successfully carried out missile launches at one of the most difficult targets, the Boar,
    Congratulations on a successful launch, but hit the boar? lol
  12. +1
    21 November 2017 09: 48
    1300 m / s is 4,5 M - not bad))
  13. 0
    21 November 2017 10: 08
    Well done boys. Hone your skills!
  14. 0
    21 November 2017 11: 12
    dauria,
    "And your tennis ball is an advertising trick, ////

    This is clear. And coatings are constantly being improved. They turn from just
    paints with metal balls in a plastered complex chip connected to a computer.
    And the percentage of absorption / reflection will be tracked directly in "real time"
    and accordingly, as the color of a chameleon crawling over a multi-colored area, the properties of the coating will change.

    In general, this is an interesting, debatable topic. drinks