Leonid Ivashov: If Russia is destabilized, then only from the inside

61
Leonid Ivashov: If Russia is destabilized, then only from the inside


Back in 1912, our eminent thinker, then Colonel of the General Staff Alexey Efimovich Vandam, wrote that it’s bad to have an Anglo-Saxon enemy, but God forbid to have him as a friend. And further - only friendship with him can be worse than the war with the Anglo-Saxons. And he based this statement on a deep historical analysis of the attitude of Britain and the Anglo-Saxon world in general to Russia. And the fact that today Teresa May claims is being fanned in the States, and in 1946, Churchill spoke - this is, in fact, a pattern of Anglo-Saxon geopolitics. Always, starting from the second half of the XIX century, they saw Russia only as an object of extraction and as a possible threat to themselves from the continental world. In the theory of Heartland (1904 year), Halford Mackinder determined that without control over Russia there can be no control over Eurasia. And without control over Eurasia there can be no world domination, as they have been dreaming of for several centuries.



Yes, they patted the Secretary General of the Soviet Union at the end of the 80s, encouraged the Russian president in the 90s, but their political strategy, their strategic attitude towards Russia, was not changed for one hour. Simply, Russia should be controlled by a semi-colonial country, which they can control and direct Russian policy in the direction they need. It is necessary for Russia to perform functions against China - please. Russia needs to work against the Islamic world — they will insist on such work. And the Anglo-Saxons need to ensure that Russia does not in any way collect the post-Soviet space and, moreover, did not consolidate Eurasia. And after all, it was at the initiative of Russia that the Eurasian Economic Union and the Eurasian political organization of Shanghai are being formed.

Russia has attacked the general world order that the Anglo-Saxons formed in closest alliance with the financial Jewish oligarchy. Russia proposed the seemingly amorphous group of BRICS countries. This is, in fact, a union of non-Western civilizations, as long as the coalition type, and then it will develop. BRICS, in fact, is already creating institutions duplicating Western ones. Its monetary fund instead of the IMF, its own bank instead of the World Bank. And the heads of five states representing their civilizations (not just nations - civilizations), agreed that they would settle in trade relations among themselves not through a dollar, but through national currencies. That is, another monetary equivalent appears. Foes can not help but worry that Russia is disturbing the world. Russia itself ceased to obey without question.

The same Cold War continues. In fact, we see nothing new here. There is a repetition of what the Truman doctrine and plans for the USSR envisaged — the 20 / 1 directive of 18 of August 1948 of the year. So Admiral Mahen’s “Anaconda Loop” (1890 year) should be tightened around Russia. It has been dragging on before, especially after the collapse of the USSR, but our then politicians spoke about it with a smile. And NATO never stopped moving to our borders for an hour, military bases were created, the missile defense system surrounded Russia and so on. Today, Russia has begun to notice this and respond to this suffocating Anaconda Loop.

May not only stated the mythical threats from Russia, but also threatened Russia. Moreover, she threatened seriously, not mythically: “I have a very simple message from Russia. I know what you are doing. And do not succeed in this. Britain will do everything necessary to protect itself, and work with our allies. That is why we are reforming NATO so that this crucial alliance can better deter and resist hostile Russian activities. That is why we have increased our military and economic support for Ukraine. ” Masks reset. And yet the question arises. Russia in its structure is a country of the same type as the United Kingdom: a country of capitalist usurious ideology. So, it’s not the ideology here, it turns out, that the ball is right, but geopolitics, which is not canceled by any ideologies?

Theresa May uses plagiarism. In the first part of her speech, she, in fact, repeated the Fulton speech of Winston Churchill and the Truman Doctrine. But the second part, when the threats are already underway, she simply rewrote from the speech of Mrs. Clinton when she was US Secretary of State. This is 2011 the year when presidential candidate Vladimir Putin announced the need to form a Eurasian Union. Then Hillary Clinton almost screamed that we would not allow the re-establishment of the Soviet empire and we would take all the measures and so on. Theresa May just repeats these screams.

And as for our eternal confrontation, the answer lies on the surface. Despite the fact that Russia has become a capitalist country with all the “market” thieves' mechanisms, however, we are two antipode civilizations. We and the Anglo-Saxons (and even more so the Jewish financial oligarchy), the meaning of life is completely different. And the culture of life is different, and the goals of development are different. Because we are a continental power that has united almost 200 nations, nations, ethnic groups, and we live by the product of our labor, the product of the nature around us. The Anglo-Saxon world, or the world of marine civilization, lives by the products of prey. So formed. And Russia for them - first, mining. And secondly - the outpost, which does not allow the whole world to make prey. And therefore they come up with various theories and strategies, how to take Russia, derive various formulas of world domination. Russia is the whetstone they cut their teeth about. And therefore, doing everything possible against us.

Today, it is not even this external aggressive pressure on Russia, including military, that poses a great danger, but I think that our current government is for Russia, which, with pathetic patriotic words, does everything to root out, eradicate our Russianness, our continentality, our independence and the pursuit of justice. This makes our big business. 96 billionaires and multimillionaires will be sold at any time - that's what's scary. And therefore, Western pressure is being exerted in order, first, to destabilize Russia. And, secondly, to intimidate billionaires so that they, like in the 90-s, would withdraw their capital to Washington, London, to global banks. Therefore, intimidation. But you should not be afraid of a military adventure. You just need to prepare for the fact that this adventure can take place, and you need to fight back. Here I am more or less calm.

If Russia is destabilized, then only from the inside. We see what is already happening with the presidential race - people who are pushing themselves for the presidency is a shame for the country. This humiliation is the lowering of the country. And the Anglo-Saxons and the global financial oligarchy did a good deed for Russia, so that we finally looked into history. We break our logic of historical perception. We, indeed, in the episodes - just like now - we see the aggressiveness of the West. But tomorrow some of our leaders will be patted on the shoulder, the rhetoric will change - and we will again consider them friends. I was surprised when October 24 held an international conference at the Academy of the General Staff with the following agenda: “Russia is the USA: allies, partners, opponents”. That is, we are still undecided at the military level - who are they for us, the Anglo-Saxon Americans? When Nikolai Yakovlevich Danilevsky, in his 1869 year, unequivocally argued that Europe has always been, is and will be hostile to Russia.

It turns out that you only need to rejoice that Teresa May is so impartial in expressing herself in our address. As in the film of Danelia, an old Armenian woman tells the heroine: “So, you are not that kind of a bastard.” This means that all is not hopeless in Russia, although, of course, the wavering of our top, our oligarchy, is the Achilles' heel, where the West is driving its arrow.

By the way, British Foreign Secretary Johnson recently issued an ultimatum to Russia - as long as the Kremlin supports Damascus, there will be no leg in Moscow. However, May, in her anti-Russian speech, announced that this same Johnson would come to Moscow the other day. What will it be? Black label for Russia, for its leadership? Let us not forget that Great Britain is the center of the world’s Freemasonry of the most predatory sense. So we get a message from there demanding surrender? How does this relate to elections in Russia?

There are grounds in the West, and especially the Anglo-Saxons, to fear the future of Russia. Most of all they are afraid today that the government of Medvedev - this is an anti-Russian government, the attendants, in fact, of Western capital - will resign. They fear that Putin’s position will be shaken. After all, intelligence reports to them that the sources of the new revolution are ripening in Russia, it is becoming inevitable. Because the situation of 1917 of the year in this 17-th year, in fact, is repeated.

And, of course, there is a similar feeling among those who are now robbing the country, both in power and in Russian capital. And therefore they run, they transfer their assets abroad, as in the same 1917, and so on. And sometimes it even seems to me (I’m not completely convinced) that criticism of Putin, criticism of the Russian leadership as a whole, pressure from the West is a method of soft power, in order to escalate the situation around Russia to preserve the current oligarchic regime. It seems to me that this is important. Here, perhaps, there is a conspiracy - not the president of the Russian Federation with the US president and the prime minister of Great Britain, but a conspiracy of oligarchic and government structures with similar structures of the enemy. He may exist.

God forbid such a government as ours, have anyone else. Where else do we see in the history of serious states that there should be a certain legal adviser to the president, who would hardly be allowed to work as a senior legal adviser even on the collective farm. I'm talking about Medvedev. He wore daddy s owner - and he was moved to the presidency. What is it? And today, Sobchak climbs into the presidency. This is just Masonic affairs. We believe that Masonic structures exist only in the West, and what, we do not have them? Moreover, in 1991, drunks capitulated, surrendered the country, as a matter of fact - and we think that masons are only abroad? It was the same in that 17 year: from the 11 members of the Provisional Government - the established 9, not hiding masons. And today we are seeing the same thing.

Money rules the world. And not Trump, Bushy, May and others. Money. And today, global financial capital has reached the goal that it set in 1907 year and. Billionaires, multimillionaires gathered on one of the islands near the USA and determined that power is a commodity, even the most expensive. Therefore, world power should belong to international financiers, such a formula. And today, lenders have reached world power, and they fear that Russia will take part in the destruction of this colonial slave-owning system, because the dollar has become a slave owner. Well, they fear that the Masonic fifth column will be expelled from Russia, as happened in the 17 year of the last century.

Probably, on the sidelines of the shadow of global global structures, the option of landing on the Russian throne Medvedev is being discussed, but I think that there will be no backstage against Putin. They simply pressure him to become more polite, more correct with the Anglo-Saxons, with the Rothschilds ... There is a shadow bargaining.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

61 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    19 November 2017 07: 58
    Impudent Saxons will climb out of our skin so that they could destroy us with the help of Khodarkovsky, bulk and other scum. It’s bad that they clatter with them in the Kremlin and play democracy.
    1. +15
      19 November 2017 11: 48
      Probably, on the sidelines of the shadow of global global structures, the option of landing on the Russian throne Medvedev is being discussed, but I think that there will be no backstage against Putin. They simply pressure him to become more polite, more correct with the Anglo-Saxons, with the Rothschilds ... There is a shadow bargaining.
      Judging by the content of the article, Ivashov had in mind Putin and Medvedev as agents of the Anglo-Saxons
    2. +3
      19 November 2017 12: 48
      210, sometimes you still need to think.
      The main danger comes from the market thieves' power policy, in which the main liberals of the market economy are located.
      Dumbness is given to every person, but not in order to show it brazenly and pass it off as the truth of the Kremlin.
      1. +5
        19 November 2017 13: 56
        and who, in fact, defines the "power policy" in the Russian Federation ????? ...
        maybe YOU ??? ... or I ??? ... maybe the population ???? ...
        correct answer: the president with his administration and the prime minister with the government ....
        1. +1
          20 November 2017 13: 01
          Quote: kepmor
          and who, in fact, defines the "power policy" in the Russian Federation ????? ...
          maybe YOU ??? ... or I ??? ... maybe the population ???? ...
          correct answer: the president with his administration and the prime minister with the government ....


          not true. Central Bank
      2. +1
        19 November 2017 17: 33
        What can I tell you. I completely agree that the danger comes from the thieves' policy .... Where did it come from? Did they think up it in the Kremlin? They brought it to us. Those from the West with the connivance and betrayal of our authorities. Well, about the stupidity .. I advise you get rid of her ..
        Quote: stas
        210, sometimes you still need to think.
        The main danger comes from the market thieves' power policy, in which the main liberals of the market economy are located.
        Dumbness is given to every person, but not in order to show it brazenly and pass it off as the truth of the Kremlin.
  2. +9
    19 November 2017 08: 18
    What a great article, and in the end it’s not even a choice. Either capitalism, or capitalism. The owners will be the capitalists of their Putin or their Medvedev. What is the difference for us in this case?
    1. +3
      19 November 2017 11: 51
      Ivashov, part of the NPSR is included, and they have their own program. Boldyrev the other day, in the Politcafe very clearly explained the topic of transnational corporations
  3. +11
    19 November 2017 08: 21
    If Russia is destabilized, then only from within

    With which I completely agree. The greater threat to the country than liberal Westerners does not exist, the more they (Westerners) have spread to all universities and are actively “educating” young people with the complete connivance of state structures.
  4. +7
    19 November 2017 08: 34
    Quote: 210ox
    Impudent Saxons will climb out of our skin so that they could destroy us with the help of Khodarkovsky, bulk and other scum. It’s bad that they clatter with them in the Kremlin and play democracy.

    And how can they not fuss? It was not Ivashov who discovered the truth about the same Freemasonry, they have been talking about this for a long time and the lists exist ... And they have tremendous leverage, including money! I can’t imagine that in the media or on TV channels they would openly publish those of the “Russian” oligarchs and officials who are masons ... It seems to me that this is not even possible on independent channels ... There will be a grandiose cracker !!! So Putin doesn’t have anyone to rely on, it was Stalin’s NKVD when he cleaned up the fifth column, and in the 90s these forces worked on the collapse of the KGB, it’s notable who is serving there now, probably their own and others ... army, its highest composition, because we remember the generals, the times of the overthrow of the king ...
    So the Yunarmia, the Popular Fronts, the Russian Guard are created, but who knows when their heads will rot? On the other side, too, do not sleep! This can be said, remembering Kennedy ...
    1. +9
      19 November 2017 09: 47
      I completely agree. To control the elite in Russia, there should be a special body whose task would be to uproot the traitors of Russia from the elite by analogy with how Stalin did it in the 30s before the war, under Ivan the Terrible, such a body was a cause. Ultimately, it was this purge of the Soviet elite that allowed us to win the war and not surrender, not put the country under the Nazis. No matter how much the liberals say or shout that the people won the war, the Soviet people, but in reality Stalin won the war, having cleared the country's leadership of traitors.
      History does not know the subjunctive mood, but it knows historical parallels and possesses them perfectly. It is enough to turn to the 90s to see why Stalin saved Russia and the USSR from the purge in the 30s. If he had not done this, there would have been no feat of the Soviet people, more precisely, he would have been, but it would have been the last blow of the Russian people going to the scaffold ... Thank God that this did not happen. It was fortunate for Russia and the USSR that it was headed by a leader who had cleansed the state leadership before the bloody war, before the Patriotic War.
      On the other hand, the 37th year teaches us yet another lesson that we always need to remember: in order for the Russian army not to be in a situation critical for the state and the Fatherland, in the situation of the Finnish war of 39-40 and the start of the Patriotic War of 19 41, for In order for the army’s purge similar to that of the end of the 30s not to be needed, the state should have a body capable of closely monitoring the personnel of the armed forces, of the education of the officer corps, before clearing out potential traitors from its ranks. Only in this way, by purifying its ranks, by purifying the Russian elite from Russia, will it be able to withstand, first of all, internal and external enemies. The betrayal of the elites is the greatest danger to Russia. Russia is able to withstand any external enemy, but it is defenseless against internal enemies that betray Russia from the inside.

      "People-State-Fatherland" - this is the slogan of every Russian patriot. A strong state, a united nation, a prosperous country for centuries, which can not be broken neither by internal nor external enemies.
      1. +10
        19 November 2017 12: 29
        Quote: The Truth
        People-State-Fatherland "is the slogan of every Russian patriot.

        And where is it about the oligarchs who own 90% of the country's property, whose villas are over the hill - among the people, in the state or in the Fatherland? And without them, it’s as if it’s not about Russia! lol
  5. +5
    19 November 2017 08: 41
    I absolutely agree, money rules the world. The world financial oligarchy is the notorious "world government". There is an opinion that the notorious confrontation between Russia and the "Western world" is actually a confrontation between Masonic "lodges" or "houses" or whatever they have (among the Masons) ...
    1. +3
      19 November 2017 13: 14
      Thieves seized power by bribing corrupt officials to rule the world.
      World thieves for some reason, one of the Jewish faith.
      1. +1
        19 November 2017 19: 55
        Quote: stas
        World thieves for some reason, one of the Jewish faith.


        Not only. The thieves' "rule" includes the Anglo-Saxons, Franks, Gottes and the Baltic states that joined them. In general, each creature is a pair. And what is better in this respect the Dutch?
  6. +4
    19 November 2017 08: 41
    When Vedmedev country will be renamed iPhone? In general, Ivashov is right, but he cannot offer an alternative person to power, which the people will follow, and who will take care of the economy not in the sense of selling the latter, but in the sense of resuscitation! !!!
    1. +3
      19 November 2017 12: 38
      Quote: Herkulesich
      In general, Ivashov is right, but he cannot offer an alternative person to power, which the people will follow, and who will take care of the economy not in the sense of selling the latter, but in the sense of resuscitation! !!!


      But he simply DOESN’t have this alternative person ... There are either talkers who have no idea in the economics of production and management and are afraid to take responsibility, or - impudent craps who identify themselves as presidential candidates who absolutely do not think about Homeland -country-nation and state ...
      For this reason, I would be more pleased to see the economic manager Luzhkov at the head of the country than the talker Zyuganov ...
      Zazyuganov communists, before reproaching me - think about what I’m talking about ...
      It is better to have in the power of an economic thief (and this is not legally proven), who knows how to keep an economy, and not offend his pocket than an empty-headed talker who has everything left in the economy plundered under his nose ... hi
  7. +5
    19 November 2017 08: 42
    If Russia is destabilized, then only from within. We see what is happening with the presidential race - people who put themselves forward for president are a shame for the country.

    Leonid Ivashov attaches great importance to destructive personalities. It is the comments of such personalities that attach importance to scum

    They all eat from Putin’s hands, his desire was enough to prevent them from getting out of the camps. The comic nature of the characters guarantees 100 wins for the candidate from power
  8. +5
    19 November 2017 09: 12
    Thanks Leonid Grigorievich. I have the honor.
  9. +2
    19 November 2017 09: 19
    Gold words! Compradors with oligarchs dominated by death for Russia. And the West is really very afraid that the current government in Russia will fall. And the revolutionary mood is really ripening, as if state employees did not index salaries, but pensioners retired. Soon the election, think about whether to go to it.
    1. +5
      19 November 2017 11: 28
      It's worth going to the polls! hi
      Otherwise, then, after sitting at home in the kitchen, they curse the state and sincerely wonder — I did not choose edro!
      I didn’t go to the polls!
      And it is with your sitting on the ass exactly that you make a good majority party gesheft!
      1. +1
        19 November 2017 13: 37
        KOTYARA 28 region, so it is the king’s dream that 100% would come to the polls, and all 100% will vote for him.
        There is nothing to do in the elections, everything has already been decided in advance for us. Let them hang out.
        But if less than 50% comes to the polls and even 60% of those who come vote, then the Tsar will not be real, but wound up by corrupt media.
        Let them chew their Figwa (people) themselves.
        1. +1
          19 November 2017 14: 25
          Come on!
          And then what?
        2. 0
          19 November 2017 15: 26
          Dear Stas! You have written everything correctly. The main thing is to delegitimize comprador power.
      2. MrK
        0
        19 November 2017 15: 12
        Quote: kot28.ru
        It's worth going to the polls!


        Mark Twain (Samuel Langhorn Clemens): "If something depended on the elections, we would not be allowed to participate in them.. "
        1. The comment was deleted.
  10. +3
    19 November 2017 09: 53
    Streamlined somehow.
    And who are they offering?

    here are quotes about "90s generation"

    This is my generation. Before our eyes, some ideals were crumbling, others were rising, so we, perhaps, are too cynical, we do not know how to apologize and forgive. I look with pity at modern skinny, awkward, ill-adapted boys and girls living in social networks and sitting on their parents' necks: how will they cope if their usual way of life is suddenly broken? Trite - will they survive?

    Yes. In reflection on this subject, he came to the same conclusions. Born at sunset Brezhnev, childhood - perestroika, youth - 90s. Stuffed, be healthy! Only Putin’s stability in domestic politics and the economy made it possible to take root and rise to its feet. Now everyone is happy. Not fabulously rich, but I have everything that I need for my soul and body. If something happens, by hook or by crook I will prevent the rollback. If you need to pick up a weapon - no problem. I'll take it. The 90s created tough selection conditions. Cunning - left. Weak - drank and died. The survivors are tempered. Nietzsche was not mistaken. Those born after the USSR — those who grew up without supervision, without education, without ideals — are empty. They think differently. God grant if this is not so.

    the generation that grew up in a period of devastation, after learning that any social upheavals of a revolutionary nature inherently do not lead to anything in the finale except poverty and humiliation of one’s own country - now, for the most part, in the eyes of Russian liberals, they are the same “quilted jackets” and “anchovies” - for some reason in elections to vote "for stability"and not for "innovative" proposals for the arrangement of Russia on behalf of Mikhail Prokhorov, Navalny or Yashin with Nemtsov.

    http://politrussia.com/society/ne-poteryannoe-pok
    olenie-483 /
    1. +4
      19 November 2017 10: 05
      Quote: algonquin
      the generation that grew up in a period of devastation, having learned that any social upheavals of a revolutionary nature inherently do not lead to anything in the finale except poverty and humiliation of one’s own country - now, for the most part, in the eyes of Russian liberals, it’s the same “quilted jackets” and “anchovies” - for some reason, those who are going to the polls vote “for stability”, and not for “innovative” proposals for equipping Russia on behalf of Mikhail Prokhorov, Navalny or Yashin with Nemtsov.

      All of these spells are not worth a damn, for one reason, not the corrupt officials promote indignation in the country, but the government itself, with its simply wild and ill-conceived reforms, the increasing volume of all kinds of payments from the population, the narrowing of social support, and the increase in prices for everything and all, and these, these only wish to take advantage of the completely just indignation of the citizens of the country, so that as if in 90, to climb on the back of the neck is strange and to "rule" as in 90.
      You write-
      Quote: algonquin
      Only Putin’s stability in domestic politics and the economy made it possible to take root and rise to its feet. Now everyone is happy. Not fabulously rich, but I have everything that I need for my soul and body. If something happens, by hook or by crook I will prevent the rollback. If you need to pick up a weapon - no problem. I'll take it.

      Who are you going to fight against? Today, there are two groups of snickering cats near the hotel. They shot, six people were injured, two are in intensive care. And for the sake of whom? For the sake of one billionaire and the second, a millionaire with a criminal, nickname "Pavlik", you’ll go fight for them ??
      Quote: algonquin
      Nietzsche was not mistaken.

      Nietzsche and fascism, with Nazism, http://www.hist.msu.ru/Science/Conf/lomweb01/petr
      ova.htm are inseparable, you are already ready for this ideology, judging by your words, not only to believe, but also to carry out actions in her name? Are you ready to go far?
      1. +2
        19 November 2017 12: 47
        Quote: badens1111
        Who will you fight against? Today


        You shouldn’t attack this guy in vain ... Most likely, you didn’t understand him ... After all, he later writes: “a generation that grew up in a period of devastation, learning any social upheavals of a revolutionary nature, in essence, do not lead to anything in the finale except poverty and humiliation of one’s own country - now, for the most part, in the eyes of Russian liberals, it is the same “quilted jackets” and “anchovies” - for some reason, those who are going to vote in the elections vote “for stability”, and not for “innovative” proposals for equipping Russia on behalf of Mikhail Prokhorov, Navalny or Yashin with Nemtsov "...
        That is, in essence, to fight as you understand - he is clearly not going to ... hi
        1. +1
          20 November 2017 10: 10
          Quote: weksha50
          in essence, to fight as you understand - he is clearly not going to

          No, my colleague, I understood correctly that anyone who has read Nietzsche begins to talk about something, much less act ... before the eyes of the tragedy of Ukraine and the memory of the horror of the invasion of Europe by Hitler.
          Liberd of various kinds, just now, is trying to saddle the protest and there are quite a few hot, but not smart heads that will ram in their directly criminal activity, that’s what it is about ..
    2. +5
      19 November 2017 13: 43
      You freak your bullshit, explain to the King.
      Do you think that only one Putin is the smartest in Russia and the most worthy.
      Former Communist and Kebist awarded EBN Order for the collapse and the robbery of the country.
      The best in the organized crime group is a godfather who does not have the right to be president, even if he is smart and crafty.
  11. The comment was deleted.
    1. +10
      19 November 2017 13: 18
      In general, I am surprised that so many advocate for Putin, although the oligarchs brought this person to power to replace Yeltsin. If it were not for Berezovsky and Sobchak, Putin would not see these posts.
      1. 0
        20 November 2017 16: 27
        Quote: Greenwood
        In general, I am surprised that so many advocate for Putin, although the oligarchs brought this person to power to replace Yeltsin. If it were not for Berezovsky and Sobchak, Putin would not see these posts.


        it’s not so important how he got power, it is important who he became and how the country is leading.
        yes, maybe Fortune gave power to Putin, but this does not mean that he cannot prove himself at the expense of personal qualities and advantages
        1. 0
          21 November 2017 19: 46
          So far, he has not shown himself very well. And the watch is
          ticking...
  12. +4
    19 November 2017 12: 07
    “Where else will we see in the history of serious states that a certain legal adviser is the president of the country, who would hardly be allowed to work as a senior legal adviser on the collective farm. I’m talking about Medvedev"...

    Well, here Ivashov is somewhat wrong ... Who hasn’t been in the presidency (I’m not talking about the premieres and a little lower) ... Even in the USA there are artists, saxophonists, and ... much more .. . laughing
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. +3
        19 November 2017 12: 48
        Quote from rudolf
        But there were no clowns!


        Um ... Well, yes ... hi
  13. +10
    19 November 2017 12: 08
    Quote from rudolf
    to blow dust off Putin, and if he still leaves some Medvedev after himself,

    Medvedev has no chance, but Kudrin ... Putin pushes him by all means. Then, with this “sweet couple” - Putin-Kudrin - the kapets will come.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. +2
        19 November 2017 12: 38
        The media already had information - "from trusted sources" - that the GDP is considering three candidates for the prime minister - Kudrin, Glazyev and Titov. Here, as they say, one does not need three times to understand who candidate No. 1 is.
        1. 0
          21 November 2017 19: 49
          :-) The level of trust in such information as such that the other three candidates are his ex-wife, a janitor from his house and Patriarch Kirill.
  14. 0
    19 November 2017 12: 57
    Ren-tv on the site?
  15. 0
    19 November 2017 13: 30
    British Foreign Secretary Johnson recently issued an ultimatum to Russia - as long as the Kremlin supports Damascus, his legs will not be in Moscow. However, May in her anti-Russian speech announced that this same Johnson would arrive in Moscow the other day.
    Well, after all, it’s not Johnson’s man to keep his word, in a word, the third sex ....
  16. +1
    19 November 2017 14: 50
    Acknowledgment to L. G. Ivashov for analysis. I allow myself to express an opinion: we need a mass organization of communists, not parliamentarians Zyuganov, but a moral and political union. GDP relies on the Russian Orthodox Church, but what about Muslims, Jews and others. The moral renewal of Russian society is possible only by a mass public organization. NKVD-KGB-ROC
  17. +5
    19 November 2017 15: 01
    Some kind of sudden tantrum. It seems that nothing special happened.
    Putin or Medvedev - what's the difference? Both represent oligarchy. The oligarchy is necessarily tied to TNCs and pro-Western. At the same time, the opposition is pro-Western. A win-win situation for the West.
    And of course it’s right that the greatest threat to Russia is its power. Here, as it were, no one doubted.
    But what to do about it? The dear general does not speak, or speaks some nonsense.
    1. +3
      19 November 2017 16: 36
      Quote: groks
      But what to do about it?

      Option number 1. Revolutionary. Arrange strikes, gather in rallies, organize riots, demand the overthrow of the regime and other blah blah blah.
      Option number 2. Legal. To stop hanging mantras about stability, "in the 90s it was worse" and "there is no one to vote for." Go to the polls. DO NOT vote for Putin and United Russia.
      july
      1. +2
        19 November 2017 17: 26
        But who then to vote for? There are no options. Only if for Ksyushad - in protest. And so it will slip again .... For success, there must be an initiative from above. But this cannot be in the current conditions - any normal person, having reached the top, becomes a non-human mutant.
        There are no conditions for the first option. And I don’t really want these conditions to be created. I have a grandson for a year ....
        But if it goes on like this, then the so-called hamsters office and other, not creating real values. When he lays down, they can save specialists, and the number of managers will be thinned.
        1. +3
          19 November 2017 17: 41
          Quote: groks
          But who then to vote for?

          See PDS NPSR, Left Front site.
          A coalition of left and right forces is being created.
      2. 0
        21 November 2017 19: 50
        Both options are excellent, but in the second there is one but! And who to vote for? ;-)
  18. The comment was deleted.
    1. +3
      19 November 2017 17: 49
      Quote: samarin1969
      .Leonid Grigorievich went on to cooperate with the "non-systemic opposition" (Boldyrev and K) - maybe he really decided on real actions, or maybe the Trojan horse? The coming year will show.

      1
      Team of People's Leaders
      pdsnpsr.ru ›news ... komanda-narodnykh-liderov_2109201
      7
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. +2
          19 November 2017 18: 07
          Quote: Golovan Jack
          Foreign ... and "L" to "P" change again - so it will be more correct. IMHO, of course.

          All of you designated citizens are sitting near the Humpback Bridge and on the arena, and there are cellists as well, and this is not IMHO - this is a fact!
  19. +2
    19 November 2017 17: 48
    Quote: Evrodav
    Quote: 210ox
    Impudent Saxons will climb out of our skin so that they could destroy us with the help of Khodarkovsky, bulk and other scum. It’s bad that they clatter with them in the Kremlin and play democracy.

    And how can they not fuss? It was not Ivashov who discovered the truth about the same Freemasonry, they have been talking about this for a long time and the lists exist ... And they have tremendous leverage, including money! I can’t imagine that in the media or on TV channels they would openly publish those of the “Russian” oligarchs and officials who are masons ... It seems to me that this is not even possible on independent channels ... There will be a grandiose cracker !!! So Putin doesn’t have anyone to rely on, it was Stalin’s NKVD when he cleaned up the fifth column, and in the 90s these forces worked on the collapse of the KGB, it’s notable who is serving there now, probably their own and others ... army, its highest composition, because we remember the generals, the times of the overthrow of the king ...
    So the Yunarmia, the Popular Fronts, the Russian Guard are created, but who knows when their heads will rot? On the other side, too, do not sleep! This can be said, remembering Kennedy ...

    Throw you nonsense to carry - "... there is no one to rely on ..." I would like - I found it! It relies on those whom it considers necessary to rely on! And she feels great at the same time! sad
  20. 0
    19 November 2017 18: 05
    Quote: weksha50
    “Where else will we see in the history of serious states that a certain legal adviser is the president of the country, who would hardly be allowed to work as a senior legal adviser on the collective farm. I’m talking about Medvedev"...

    Well, here Ivashov is somewhat wrong ... Who hasn’t been in the presidency (I’m not talking about the premieres and a little lower) ... Even in the USA there are artists, saxophonists, and ... much more .. . laughing

    And for the United States it makes no difference who the president is - at least an artist, or a clown, but at least a scavenger! This post is a classic ziz chairman! Other people lead! wassat
    1. 0
      21 November 2017 19: 51
      So in Russia exactly the same now ...
  21. +1
    19 November 2017 19: 49
    "If Russia is destabilized ..." And why "will be," if it already is. belay
    The stabilization of Russia is hindered by a liberal government acting strategically on the basis of the anti-people’s Constitution of the Russian Federation. And, every day, Russia is being corroded by an alien ideology of thousands and thousands of state-owned NGOs distributed to us throughout mother Russia. And these are all-wheel wedges and wheels of our economy and manufacturing business. A quarter of a century of stagnation and plunder of Russia, and its people, each individually! No “voting” helps. People damn democracy. Where we are going? belay No one knows. For it is forbidden!
    The system needs to be changed. hi We are aging and leaving. And children and grandchildren are disinherited by the Unified State Examination in schools and by the “lap-dog” in “modern universities” and various HSE, and even then to the level of an incomplete higher education. But the state does not even want to hear this.
  22. +1
    20 November 2017 09: 49
    Unfortunately, in Russia there is no chance of a peaceful change of power, course or vector (this is like anyone else), it is irretrievably lost. All legislation is imprisoned for maintaining power in the hands of a very narrow circle of people. The situation is somewhat reminiscent of a monarchy, only a relative and an ideologically and socially close element are appointed to the receivers. Whether or not to go to the polls is purely personal, how to go to the cinema. True, there is one interesting point, if before the military was driven only to "grandiose performances", now they demand to attend "local premieres". Maybe the percentage of turnout is really critical for them and failure to appear will greatly complicate the life of the majority party and their plowmen?
  23. +1
    20 November 2017 09: 50
    May God grant Health to Leonid Grigorievich - he said well to the point. It is a pity in the elections, GDP and liberals did not give you the go.
  24. +1
    21 November 2017 17: 55
    Yes, and Pu, and Me have long been billionaires. They will agree how to milk us ... They already sing that there is no money for retirement ... Even nails and hammers are made in China. But is it difficult for them to understand that production gives taxes. No production, no jobs, no taxes ... It's that simple. It is necessary to restore production. and not kissing Kudrin sucker ...
    1. 0
      21 November 2017 19: 52
      I almost vomited when I imagined vaguely with Kudrin.
  25. 0
    21 November 2017 20: 28
    Quote: The Truth
    To control the elite in Russia, there must be a special body whose task would be to uproot the traitors of Russia from the elite ...
    And who will control the regulatory body? Another supervisory authority? )) The point is in the system. Take the police, for example. How many do not control it, how many do not check, do not rename or reform, all one, the cops (tm) are obtained at the output. And all because there is a system error. In all countries, law enforcement agencies protect citizens, while in our country law enforcement agencies are fighting crime. Do you see the difference? )) Also with our government as a whole. Everything is turned upside down. Upside down, nothing, as a rule, does not work normally.
  26. 0
    23 November 2017 15: 53
    Quote: andrej-shironov
    So in Russia exactly the same now ...

    Such an impression takes place to be ... sad
  27. 0
    23 November 2017 16: 37
    And what remains if there is no support - the bourgeoisie is mainly oriented to the West, calls for the development of small and medium-sized businesses as the basis of the economic power of the state remain calls, the military-industrial complex is only following orders, the army has just begun to gain strength, and special services are and special services so that no one understands what they are doing until they themselves tell. Moreover, constant scandals in the coverage of various events, actions, words, historical facts of the development of our country. So it turns out that the general is right. He has something to compare with, since Yugoslavia was destroyed in a similar way.
  28. 0
    23 November 2017 21: 43
    Alas, we have little choice now: either Putin’s sovereign thieves in the Kremlin, who are forced to save the country at least for their own sake, or compradors from Bolotnaya, who have been retailing the country since the 90s, and who will be sold in bulk from the Kremlin and together with the Kremlin, tea is not Newton’s bin, is it already understood?
  29. 0
    23 December 2017 06: 09
    The main danger to our state comes from the frank poverty of our pensioners, those who, while doing business, see what will happen to them in the future, and begin to “get out” - to provide themselves with a comfortable old age. Therefore, until people become confident in their future, economic crime (corruption, etc.) cannot be defeated!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"