Back in 1912, our eminent thinker, then Colonel of the General Staff Alexey Efimovich Vandam, wrote that it’s bad to have an Anglo-Saxon enemy, but God forbid to have him as a friend. And further - only friendship with him can be worse than the war with the Anglo-Saxons. And he based this statement on a deep historical analysis of the attitude of Britain and the Anglo-Saxon world in general to Russia. And the fact that today Teresa May claims is being fanned in the States, and in 1946, Churchill spoke - this is, in fact, a pattern of Anglo-Saxon geopolitics. Always, starting from the second half of the XIX century, they saw Russia only as an object of extraction and as a possible threat to themselves from the continental world. In the theory of Heartland (1904 year), Halford Mackinder determined that without control over Russia there can be no control over Eurasia. And without control over Eurasia there can be no world domination, as they have been dreaming of for several centuries.
Yes, they patted the Secretary General of the Soviet Union at the end of the 80s, encouraged the Russian president in the 90s, but their political strategy, their strategic attitude towards Russia, was not changed for one hour. Simply, Russia should be controlled by a semi-colonial country, which they can control and direct Russian policy in the direction they need. It is necessary for Russia to perform functions against China - please. Russia needs to work against the Islamic world — they will insist on such work. And the Anglo-Saxons need to ensure that Russia does not in any way collect the post-Soviet space and, moreover, did not consolidate Eurasia. And after all, it was at the initiative of Russia that the Eurasian Economic Union and the Eurasian political organization of Shanghai are being formed.
Russia has attacked the general world order that the Anglo-Saxons formed in closest alliance with the financial Jewish oligarchy. Russia proposed the seemingly amorphous group of BRICS countries. This is, in fact, a union of non-Western civilizations, as long as the coalition type, and then it will develop. BRICS, in fact, is already creating institutions duplicating Western ones. Its monetary fund instead of the IMF, its own bank instead of the World Bank. And the heads of five states representing their civilizations (not just nations - civilizations), agreed that they would settle in trade relations among themselves not through a dollar, but through national currencies. That is, another monetary equivalent appears. Foes can not help but worry that Russia is disturbing the world. Russia itself ceased to obey without question.
The same Cold War continues. In fact, we see nothing new here. There is a repetition of what the Truman doctrine and plans for the USSR envisaged — the 20 / 1 directive of 18 of August 1948 of the year. So Admiral Mahen’s “Anaconda Loop” (1890 year) should be tightened around Russia. It has been dragging on before, especially after the collapse of the USSR, but our then politicians spoke about it with a smile. And NATO never stopped moving to our borders for an hour, military bases were created, the missile defense system surrounded Russia and so on. Today, Russia has begun to notice this and respond to this suffocating Anaconda Loop.
May not only stated the mythical threats from Russia, but also threatened Russia. Moreover, she threatened seriously, not mythically: “I have a very simple message from Russia. I know what you are doing. And do not succeed in this. Britain will do everything necessary to protect itself, and work with our allies. That is why we are reforming NATO so that this crucial alliance can better deter and resist hostile Russian activities. That is why we have increased our military and economic support for Ukraine. ” Masks reset. And yet the question arises. Russia in its structure is a country of the same type as the United Kingdom: a country of capitalist usurious ideology. So, it’s not the ideology here, it turns out, that the ball is right, but geopolitics, which is not canceled by any ideologies?
Theresa May uses plagiarism. In the first part of her speech, she, in fact, repeated the Fulton speech of Winston Churchill and the Truman Doctrine. But the second part, when the threats are already underway, she simply rewrote from the speech of Mrs. Clinton when she was US Secretary of State. This is 2011 the year when presidential candidate Vladimir Putin announced the need to form a Eurasian Union. Then Hillary Clinton almost screamed that we would not allow the re-establishment of the Soviet empire and we would take all the measures and so on. Theresa May just repeats these screams.
And as for our eternal confrontation, the answer lies on the surface. Despite the fact that Russia has become a capitalist country with all the “market” thieves' mechanisms, however, we are two antipode civilizations. We and the Anglo-Saxons (and even more so the Jewish financial oligarchy), the meaning of life is completely different. And the culture of life is different, and the goals of development are different. Because we are a continental power that has united almost 200 nations, nations, ethnic groups, and we live by the product of our labor, the product of the nature around us. The Anglo-Saxon world, or the world of marine civilization, lives by the products of prey. So formed. And Russia for them - first, mining. And secondly - the outpost, which does not allow the whole world to make prey. And therefore they come up with various theories and strategies, how to take Russia, derive various formulas of world domination. Russia is the whetstone they cut their teeth about. And therefore, doing everything possible against us.
Today, it is not even this external aggressive pressure on Russia, including military, that poses a great danger, but I think that our current government is for Russia, which, with pathetic patriotic words, does everything to root out, eradicate our Russianness, our continentality, our independence and the pursuit of justice. This makes our big business. 96 billionaires and multimillionaires will be sold at any time - that's what's scary. And therefore, Western pressure is being exerted in order, first, to destabilize Russia. And, secondly, to intimidate billionaires so that they, like in the 90-s, would withdraw their capital to Washington, London, to global banks. Therefore, intimidation. But you should not be afraid of a military adventure. You just need to prepare for the fact that this adventure can take place, and you need to fight back. Here I am more or less calm.
If Russia is destabilized, then only from the inside. We see what is already happening with the presidential race - people who are pushing themselves for the presidency is a shame for the country. This humiliation is the lowering of the country. And the Anglo-Saxons and the global financial oligarchy did a good deed for Russia, so that we finally looked into history. We break our logic of historical perception. We, indeed, in the episodes - just like now - we see the aggressiveness of the West. But tomorrow some of our leaders will be patted on the shoulder, the rhetoric will change - and we will again consider them friends. I was surprised when October 24 held an international conference at the Academy of the General Staff with the following agenda: “Russia is the USA: allies, partners, opponents”. That is, we are still undecided at the military level - who are they for us, the Anglo-Saxon Americans? When Nikolai Yakovlevich Danilevsky, in his 1869 year, unequivocally argued that Europe has always been, is and will be hostile to Russia.
It turns out that you only need to rejoice that Teresa May is so impartial in expressing herself in our address. As in the film of Danelia, an old Armenian woman tells the heroine: “So, you are not that kind of a bastard.” This means that all is not hopeless in Russia, although, of course, the wavering of our top, our oligarchy, is the Achilles' heel, where the West is driving its arrow.
By the way, British Foreign Secretary Johnson recently issued an ultimatum to Russia - as long as the Kremlin supports Damascus, there will be no leg in Moscow. However, May, in her anti-Russian speech, announced that this same Johnson would come to Moscow the other day. What will it be? Black label for Russia, for its leadership? Let us not forget that Great Britain is the center of the world’s Freemasonry of the most predatory sense. So we get a message from there demanding surrender? How does this relate to elections in Russia?
There are grounds in the West, and especially the Anglo-Saxons, to fear the future of Russia. Most of all they are afraid today that the government of Medvedev - this is an anti-Russian government, the attendants, in fact, of Western capital - will resign. They fear that Putin’s position will be shaken. After all, intelligence reports to them that the sources of the new revolution are ripening in Russia, it is becoming inevitable. Because the situation of 1917 of the year in this 17-th year, in fact, is repeated.
And, of course, there is a similar feeling among those who are now robbing the country, both in power and in Russian capital. And therefore they run, they transfer their assets abroad, as in the same 1917, and so on. And sometimes it even seems to me (I’m not completely convinced) that criticism of Putin, criticism of the Russian leadership as a whole, pressure from the West is a method of soft power, in order to escalate the situation around Russia to preserve the current oligarchic regime. It seems to me that this is important. Here, perhaps, there is a conspiracy - not the president of the Russian Federation with the US president and the prime minister of Great Britain, but a conspiracy of oligarchic and government structures with similar structures of the enemy. He may exist.
God forbid such a government as ours, have anyone else. Where else do we see in the history of serious states that there should be a certain legal adviser to the president, who would hardly be allowed to work as a senior legal adviser even on the collective farm. I'm talking about Medvedev. He wore daddy s owner - and he was moved to the presidency. What is it? And today, Sobchak climbs into the presidency. This is just Masonic affairs. We believe that Masonic structures exist only in the West, and what, we do not have them? Moreover, in 1991, drunks capitulated, surrendered the country, as a matter of fact - and we think that masons are only abroad? It was the same in that 17 year: from the 11 members of the Provisional Government - the established 9, not hiding masons. And today we are seeing the same thing.
Money rules the world. And not Trump, Bushy, May and others. Money. And today, global financial capital has reached the goal that it set in 1907 year and. Billionaires, multimillionaires gathered on one of the islands near the USA and determined that power is a commodity, even the most expensive. Therefore, world power should belong to international financiers, such a formula. And today, lenders have reached world power, and they fear that Russia will take part in the destruction of this colonial slave-owning system, because the dollar has become a slave owner. Well, they fear that the Masonic fifth column will be expelled from Russia, as happened in the 17 year of the last century.
Probably, on the sidelines of the shadow of global global structures, the option of landing on the Russian throne Medvedev is being discussed, but I think that there will be no backstage against Putin. They simply pressure him to become more polite, more correct with the Anglo-Saxons, with the Rothschilds ... There is a shadow bargaining.