Military Review

The newest Russian radar patrol aircraft A-100 made the first flight

86
The newest Russian radar and guidance aircraft A-100 made its first flight on Saturday, the press service of the VEGA concern (part of the Russian Electronics holding of the Rostec state corporation) reported that it was developing the car.


18 November, 2017, the first flight of the multifunctional aviation complex of the A-100 radar patrol and guidance took place
- Said in concern.

The newest Russian radar patrol aircraft A-100 made the first flight


As explained in the "Vega", during the first flight "the aerodynamic characteristics of the aircraft, the operability of the avionics and parts of the target equipment of the RTK [radio engineering complex] were checked."

The press service recalled that the A-100 was created on the basis of the Il-76MD-90А military transport aircraft, on which "a fairing with a unique antenna system and the latest special radio equipment was installed", which allow the new machine to quickly build up the radar field in a given direction .

In addition, aviation the complex can detect and track air and other targets, as well as participate in the management of fighter and strike aircraft when pointing at air, ground and sea targets
- explained in the "Vega".

Aircraft A-100 is created in the framework of the experimental design work "Premier 476". It should replace the A-50 and A-50U aircraft. Earlier it was reported that the serial supply of new machines to the troops will begin in 2020, reports TASS
Photos used:
© Press Service of the concern "Vega"
86 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. The leader of the Redskins
    The leader of the Redskins 18 November 2017 13: 14 New
    26
    This is good news - I sit high, I look far!))) laughing
    1. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 18 November 2017 13: 26 New
      20
      And remember, there was news that in 2019 they will begin to fly, and mass production almost in 2021? I still argued that everything that we expect will not be later than 2018.
      1. pvv113
        pvv113 18 November 2017 13: 31 New
        20
        I remember this news. There, in the comments, one wise guy argued that Russia does not need such aircraft
        1. figwam
          figwam 18 November 2017 13: 41 New
          +6
          Hooray! it happened!
      2. 210ox
        210ox 18 November 2017 14: 09 New
        +5
        Yes, Sergey, that’s true. And most importantly, the news is not from Rogozin .. Thank God this vanguard official was silent.
        Quote: Lord of the Sith
        And remember, there was news that in 2019 they will begin to fly, and mass production almost in 2021? I still argued that everything that we expect will not be later than 2018.
        1. kenig1
          kenig1 18 November 2017 14: 12 New
          14
          You have all the troubles from Rogozin.
          1. astankard
            astankard 18 November 2017 15: 08 New
            +2
            If only from Rogozin ...
          2. ver_
            ver_ 18 November 2017 16: 34 New
            0
            ... yeah - still haven't driven the mattresses onto a trampoline ..
            1. astankard
              astankard 19 November 2017 12: 53 New
              +2
              What does he drive then? With your idiotic giggles and long tongue?
              .....
              The Vostochny Cosmodrome - curated, oversaw - total theft .... How many times have they tried to sell secret developments for Bugor, under Putin? Twice.
              Trampolines? On Russian engines, now only the 3rd rocket takes off .... This is in recent years, since Russia, like the United States, has reduced the number of launches by almost half ... From 1997 to about 2010, our rocket engines were used only on the 6-8th rocket ....
              For 2014, the Americans made 23 missile launches, on our engines 9 ..
              2015 - 20 starts, with the participation of our engines -9.
              2016 - 22 launches, our 8
              2017 is 25, ours are 6.
              So Rogozinsky "trampoline", it's stories for idiots.
              Before shouting "cheers", you need to look at what is happening in the country as a whole.
              But in general .. we have a professional army, and we still have year-olds who, if they wish, go to the army, this is in the best case ... Have you been in the army? .. Noticeable.
              You can and should be a patriot, and a lousy idiot is a crime.
              1. The comment was deleted.
              2. turbris
                turbris 19 November 2017 14: 51 New
                +2
                Relentless critic of astankard! Take a closer look at the budget of Russia and the USA, see the difference? You probably still live in the USSR? Until
                Quote: astankard
                guttural idiot
                you’re just putting yourself up if you think that we with the USA can play on the same field. I also want to remind you that there are a lot of “critics” like you on the site, and if you want, with something to stand out, offer something constructive.
                1. astankard
                  astankard 20 November 2017 11: 12 New
                  0
                  I am a realist, and I say what I see and know, what is stupid to deny!
                  It seems that you are the same as Rogozin - what are you talking about, what about the budget? And what is the matter with him?
                  Compare the prices and salaries of workers in the USA and Russia, and better keep quiet.
                  I am doing my own thing, and not shaking my tongue like you and Rogozin denying the obvious.
                  1. Nikolai Grek
                    Nikolai Grek 20 November 2017 15: 51 New
                    +3
                    Quote: astankard
                    I am a realist, and I say what I see and know, what is stupid to deny!
                    It seems that you are the same as Rogozin - what are you talking about, what about the budget? And what is the matter with him?
                    Compare the prices and salaries of workers in the USA and Russia, and better keep quiet.
                    I am doing my own thing, and not shaking my tongue like you and Rogozin denying the obvious.

                    and lope your salary in America ??? winked winked wassat wassat lol lol lol
                    1. astankard
                      astankard 20 November 2017 16: 32 New
                      0
                      I expected similar childish stupidity. ) Not about you - about the sword belt?
                      1. Nikolai Grek
                        Nikolai Grek 20 November 2017 17: 31 New
                        +1
                        Quote: astankard
                        I expected similar childish stupidity. ) Not about you - about the sword belt?

                        so how much was your sn in america in the last month ??? winked winked laughing laughing
                2. astankard
                  astankard 20 November 2017 11: 43 New
                  0
                  I’ll add about BUDGETS, otherwise you won’t understand anything anyway. so at least the “sergeant” will explain! )))
                  The United States bought Russian engines because they were three times cheaper than American ones. Explain why?
                  Because the salary of the average worker is 40 thousand rubles, and they have 4 dollars. The same is for ALL subcontractors.
                  Now let's take the “most expensive” F-35, for a price of $ 90 million apiece, and compare it with our new Su-57 ... It’s clear that these are aircraft of different classes, and it’s impossible to compare how some fools do it, but!
                  The cost of an export Su-57 costs from $ 100 million, and this is an export "cut" option.
                  What do we have at the output?
                  The fact that our planes are cheaper for the State at our expense, but at the world level are .. at the world level !!!
                  The United States, when building an airplane, spends more on salaries (it ALWAYS was included in the cost of the product) than Russia.
                  The same thing with all the weapons, and indeed with all the products that we sell over the hill.
                  Therefore, there is no need to talk about some kind of huge American budget, where not a small share goes - it’s understandable, especially in the field of high technologies .... Therefore, people run there.
                  And Rogozin is a cheap populist.
                  1. turbris
                    turbris 21 November 2017 11: 41 New
                    +1
                    In my opinion you are stuck on salaries, as when youth were on the Maidan. Not salaries need to be compared, but what remains after all payments for life, given that the Americans live mainly on credit and pay all kinds of insurance, they do not have much left for life. Therefore, do not fake about salaries, based on fools.
                    Quote: astankard
                    Now let's take the “most expensive” F-35, for a price of $ 90 million apiece, and compare it with our new Su-57 ... It’s clear that these are aircraft of different classes, and it’s impossible to compare how some fools do it, but!

                    Of course, airplanes of different classes, generations +5, but everyone is trying to compare what they even have no idea about, only advertising LTHs are printed in the press, no one will print real combat capabilities in the public domain, therefore there is nothing to compare.
                    1. astankard
                      astankard 21 November 2017 14: 32 New
                      0
                      It is foolish to deny such things at cost as wages.
                      So let's not ....
                      I did not discuss the combat capabilities of the aircraft, but said something completely different.
                      If you still do not understand, goodbye, there is nothing to discuss.
    2. DEPARTMENT-1
      DEPARTMENT-1 18 November 2017 14: 05 New
      +6
      Quote: Leader of the Redskins
      This is good news - I sit high, I look far!))) laughing

      Whoever owns the information, owns the world ... Russia has learned it well!
      1. astankard
        astankard 18 November 2017 15: 07 New
        +4
        Russia has shown it well in Syria.
        1. Roma
          Roma 1977 18 November 2017 17: 58 New
          +2
          And it would be better in Ukraine would show ...
          1. Orionvit
            Orionvit 18 November 2017 18: 47 New
            +3
            Quote: Roma-1977
            And it would be better in Ukraine would show ...

            Better be И in Ukraine ... More precisely.
          2. astankard
            astankard 19 November 2017 13: 00 New
            0
            We do not have a declared war with Ukraine, and normal, Russian people who are not related to the regime also live there.
    3. nomad62
      nomad62 18 November 2017 19: 08 New
      +1
      The good news
      Only now, back in the USSR in 1983 (34 (!) Years ago) three IL-50s were converted into the A-76.
      And on the Soviet "swans" and "bears" fly, damn it, so far.
      1. Nikolai Grek
        Nikolai Grek 19 November 2017 00: 50 New
        +2
        Quote: nomad62
        And on the Soviet "swans" and "bears" fly, damn it, so far.

        what they do not suit you and what do you offer in return ?????
        1. Krabik
          Krabik 19 November 2017 21: 09 New
          0
          To offer a replacement, you need to develop tactics and strategy, and create a technique for it.

          And for this we need people who are not Kudrinskaya hardening, which are not in the government and will not be.

          As the saying goes "Tsung Tswang."
          1. Nikolai Grek
            Nikolai Grek 19 November 2017 21: 26 New
            +2
            Quote: Krabik
            To offer a replacement, you need to develop tactics and strategy, and create a technique for it.

            And for this we need people who are not Kudrinskaya hardening, which are not in the government and will not be.

            As the saying goes "Tsung Tswang."

            what what what Another "great" strategist drew !!! wassat laughing laughing laughing
            1. turbris
              turbris 20 November 2017 11: 12 New
              +1
              This is certainly a great number of "great strategists", we are turning any topic into politics, discussing a plane, the authorities are to blame for everything, you haven’t developed an understanding of tactics and strategy. I just do not understand why they are sitting in the VO, go to the "Political Review", there they have the place.
              1. Nikolai Grek
                Nikolai Grek 20 November 2017 15: 49 New
                +1
                Quote: turbris
                This is certainly a great number of "great strategists", we are turning any topic into politics, discussing a plane, the authorities are to blame for everything, you haven’t developed an understanding of tactics and strategy. I just do not understand why they are sitting in the VO, go to the "Political Review", there they have the place.

                among their own liberals they are not interested !!!! they want to be in the company of normal people !!! wassat wassat laughing laughing laughing
  2. brick
    brick 18 November 2017 13: 16 New
    +2
    Great news ! ))))
  3. san4es
    san4es 18 November 2017 13: 16 New
    14
    Interestingly, the possibilities of the Russian Premier have already been discussed in the West. So, in a material published not so long ago by the American publication Right Side News, the emphasis is placed on the fact that the use of this aircraft with early warning radar can significantly increase the capabilities of Russian air defense systems. In particular, as the author of the article, journalist Michael Snyder emphasized, the A-100 will give new opportunities to the S-500 Prometheus anti-aircraft missile system.
    “This complex, combined with the Premiere, will be able to intercept intercontinental ballistic missiles,” the author of the publication emphasized.

    ... Invisibility does not existsoldier
    1. Going
      Going 18 November 2017 13: 23 New
      11
      The US thinks they exist. lol
      1. san4es
        san4es 18 November 2017 13: 27 New
        +7
        Quote: Going
        The US thinks they exist. lol

        ... they have there bully
        1. mat-vey
          mat-vey 18 November 2017 14: 00 New
          +2
          It was them who spread across the ocean from their ancestors - Wells is a British naglosax ...
    2. poquello
      poquello 18 November 2017 13: 54 New
      +2
      IMHO it is more important for guidance
  4. Herculesic
    Herculesic 18 November 2017 13: 44 New
    +4
    This project only saves Taganrozhtsev from the closure of the aircraft plant. ..
    1. Vlad.by
      Vlad.by 18 November 2017 16: 42 New
      +2
      But the Be-200 is not?
      1. Aviator_
        Aviator_ 18 November 2017 21: 16 New
        0
        Only the Ministry of Emergencies ordered them a little, but the Moscow Region did not order.
        1. Nikolai Grek
          Nikolai Grek 19 November 2017 00: 51 New
          +2
          Quote: Aviator_
          Only the Ministry of Emergencies ordered them a little, but the Moscow Region did not order.

          what what what otherwise they are eager to produce 10 aircraft per day !!!! laughing laughing laughing
  5. sabakina
    sabakina 18 November 2017 13: 48 New
    +5
    IL-76 made a flight. What's the news? They would write, "The latest radio complex has taken off." And then the plane is the plane ... Victims of the exam!
    1. HEATHER
      HEATHER 18 November 2017 13: 57 New
      +3
      Do not swear much. Not everyone in Aviation rummages. And do not pay attention to victims. Spit on them and take care of your health. drinks
      1. sabakina
        sabakina 18 November 2017 13: 58 New
        +3
        Dimych! I haven’t seen you for a long time! drinks
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. sabakina
            sabakina 18 November 2017 14: 06 New
            +3
            Come on, pull on your shoulder straps, otherwise you have to look up and down ...
            1. HEATHER
              HEATHER 18 November 2017 14: 14 New
              +3
              You pull on the shoulder straps How to get out. Yourself, like in a sex! wassat
              1. sabakina
                sabakina 18 November 2017 14: 41 New
                +4
                Dimych, thanks for the video. Something like that on your video at 1:00, I myself saw in 1986 in the winter at 7:00 in the morning. True, there THIS something "shot" back some kind of point (the peasants and I called it the "bullet"), which stood still and glowed until it dawned. Judging by the direction, it flew over the Susaninsky / Sudislavsky district, where our missile points were then located.
              2. Aviator_
                Aviator_ 18 November 2017 21: 27 New
                +1
                In the first minute - an analogue of the “Petrozavodsk miracle”, when the missile launch from Plesetsk gave a similar atmospheric picture. At night in the summer, 1984, while in the Altai taiga, personally observed the start of Savitskaya (and someone else) from Baikonur. A very beautiful sight, the separation of steps is clearly visible, under the curtain - 4 of yellow fire (the discarded side steps burned.
      2. Ustin
        Ustin 19 November 2017 07: 51 New
        0
        It will take another three to five years of great work for the complex to go into the parameters. Moreover, in my opinion, I have to participate in the tests, which I’m not going to impose on people who are fumbling in aviation, from three machines. but what's the point then ...
    2. ver_
      ver_ 18 November 2017 16: 40 New
      0
      ..dyk - on the photo there is a mushroom on the roof ..
    3. Orionvit
      Orionvit 18 November 2017 18: 57 New
      +3
      Quote: sabakina
      IL-76 made a flight. What's the news?

      Can you read?
      during the first flight "the aerodynamic characteristics of the aircraft, the performance of the avionics, and parts of the target equipment of the RTK [radio complex] were checked."
      The Russian language says: "and parts of target equipment". Anyway blurt out the language. And for the victims of the exam. Do not insult people and do not judge by yourself, even if you can’t read the article normally.
  6. HEATHER
    HEATHER 18 November 2017 13: 54 New
    +1
    I want a video. Namely A-100. UNDERSTANDING.
    1. Vita vko
      Vita vko 18 November 2017 15: 26 New
      +1
      What is there to watch? Externally, the usual IL-96. The head fairing remains the same, which means the frequency range has not changed. A new antenna has appeared above the cockpit, probably to control fighter jets. Information was also skipped that there will be side antennas with a synthesized dressing for ground reconnaissance and target designation. I would like to hope that, unlike the A-50, the new A-100 will still become 3-coordinate, and on top is an AFAR with the corresponding capabilities for generating low-potential ultra-wideband signals. But this, if it will be known, is only from foreign sources. You should not expect that the internal compartments, like some performance characteristics, will be announced in the next 20 years.
      1. Orionvit
        Orionvit 18 November 2017 19: 03 New
        +1
        Quote: Vita VKO
        The head fairing remains the same, which means the frequency range has not changed

        Do you judge the frequency range by fairing? Very curious. And I always thought that this indicator depends on the antenna, which is hidden under this cowl. laughing
        1. Vita vko
          Vita vko 18 November 2017 22: 45 New
          +1
          Quote: Orionvit
          Depends on the antenna, which is hidden under this cowl.

          Of course, according to your logic, at least 2 options are possible:
          - the antenna is more than a fairing
          - the antenna is much smaller than the fairing.
          It’s a pity that such “logic”, which can be misleading ..., the designers will not be able to appreciate, their imagination is not so off-scale lol
          1. Orionvit
            Orionvit 19 November 2017 06: 49 New
            +1
            Quote: Vita VKO
            - the antenna is more than a fairing
            - the antenna is much smaller than the fairing.
            It’s a pity that such a “logic” can be misleading

            Something you write nonsense. Following your “logic” (with which, apparently, you are not quite friends, but are on your own “wave”), I dare to remind you that you forgot the third option, that under the fairing, there is no antenna at all. (did not have time to deliver, or the enemies stole). laughing How, then, do you define "frequency response"? Perhaps you can determine the power and engine parameters just by looking at the hood of the car? Or computer settings, just looking at the system unit? But at the same time, and the characteristics of the ship's sonar, looking at the fairing. By the way, at the institute, on the subject of "antenna-feeder devices", I had a five.
            1. Vita vko
              Vita vko 19 November 2017 08: 53 New
              0
              Quote: Orionvit
              I dare to remind you that you forgot the third option, that under the fairing, there is no antenna at all. (did not have time to deliver, or the enemies stole). How, then, do you define "frequency response"?

              Really - tin! belay Reagan with his star wars can only nervously smoke on the sidelines.
              Quote: Orionvit
              at the institute, on the subject of "antenna-feeder devices", I had a five
              It is a pity that the basics of operational-tactical camouflage were not taught at your institute. I think you would have five in this discipline.
              1. Orionvit
                Orionvit 19 November 2017 18: 28 New
                +2
                It is a pity that the basics of operational-tactical camouflage were not taught at your institute.
                I did not think that the aerodynamic fairing, from a purely functional device, turned into something designed to deceive vigilant enemies, especially since they would not have counted the "frequency". After all, anyone looking at the A-100 will never suspect a radar patrol aircraft in it. laughing
      2. HEATHER
        HEATHER 20 November 2017 14: 06 New
        0
        Externally, the usual IL-96. Strange. Or it seemed to me that this is an IL-76?
    2. Nikolai Grek
      Nikolai Grek 19 November 2017 00: 59 New
      +2
      Quote: VERESK
      I want a video. Namely A-100. UNDERSTANDING.

      http://in24.org/technology/29598?utm_sourc
      e = warfiles.ru
      1. HEATHER
        HEATHER 20 November 2017 14: 07 New
        +1
        Nikolai Grek good drinks Senkyu believe mach. Or whatever is right.
        1. Nikolai Grek
          Nikolai Grek 20 November 2017 15: 51 New
          +2
          Quote: VERESK
          Nikolai Grek good drinks Senkyu believe mach. Or whatever is right.

          hi hi yes there is nothing !!! drinks drinks drinks soldier soldier soldier lol lol lol
  7. Troll
    Troll 18 November 2017 13: 54 New
    0
    They, that is, pilots and specialists, foil caps (lead underpants) or what else .. Pills? During sentinel flights, give out?
    As I understand it, the radiation there is not sickly, and the staff, unlike ground stations, is located very close to the emitter.
    1. HEATHER
      HEATHER 18 November 2017 13: 59 New
      +4
      I understand that radiation there is not sickly Are you friends with physics? Everything is fine there. Don’t worry about us.
      1. Troll
        Troll 18 November 2017 14: 01 New
        0
        Personally, I’m not worried about you. Do not exaggerate
        1. sabakina
          sabakina 18 November 2017 14: 04 New
          +3
          Quote: Troll
          Personally, I’m not worried about you. Do not exaggerate

          And for me? wink
          1. HEATHER
            HEATHER 18 November 2017 14: 19 New
            +2
            And for me? wink Leave him alone, nasty! laughing If a person does not understand the danger and its overcoming, let him at least read literature. And then diby statements are annoying.
            1. Troll
              Troll 18 November 2017 14: 40 New
              0
              And you, of course, are not the easiest clever. And of course you know that A50 personnel watching the war in the Strait suffered from increased fatigue and baldness.
              And of course you know how with this on the new A100, you know everything, but you are lazy to tell. Do not be lazy. Clever women should not be lazy.
              1. HEATHER
                HEATHER 18 November 2017 14: 50 New
                +6
                But nothing that I, actually, is the former A-50 comez? Do not go where you do not rummage. Learn the history of Germany. While we are kind.
                1. serg2.72
                  serg2.72 18 November 2017 20: 02 New
                  0
                  And I'm an engineer of the largest radio center in the USSR ...
                  Naturally, sanitary standards, and on the A-50, 100 do not go beyond the standards adopted in the "shaggy" years, but you better not know these standards ..
              2. turbris
                turbris 21 November 2017 15: 17 New
                0
                The effect of radiation on the human body is well understood, but the effect of electromagnetic radiation is rather weak. Of course, there are sanitary standards, but each person has his own electromagnetic field, so baldness is not on this topic and children are born normally, but of course fatigue takes place.
            2. sabakina
              sabakina 18 November 2017 14: 45 New
              +5
              Dimych, by trolling the troll, this is awesome! Although it’s boring for me ... Well, it’s in the bathhouse!
              1. HEATHER
                HEATHER 18 November 2017 14: 54 New
                0
                .Well him in the bath!And you know, Valera is interesting. What can be put forward by a body that doesn’t rummage in technology? I’m afraid of dying of death! Many spouses have bred today. such a nickname. It’s just not fumbling in the topic. And to teach, if you want, without problems. Troll! Do you hear? Your move.
                1. sabakina
                  sabakina 18 November 2017 14: 58 New
                  +2
                  Valera? belay Have you brought Valera yet? am (c) With light steam or irony of fate.
                  1. HEATHER
                    HEATHER 18 November 2017 15: 34 New
                    0
                    Have you brought Valera yet? Taking a walk ...
        2. tso1973
          tso1973 18 November 2017 18: 11 New
          0
          You asked the wrong one! Well, the comet without a cap made of foil on the A-50 flew here and it’s angry, and I doubt that he knows anything about radiation, he was told that it’s not harmful, he believed!))) In general, at such frequencies what radar even works a wooden stick will be a screen, not to mention the material of the fuselage, and the directivity of the antenna also plays a role!
      2. The comment was deleted.
  8. q75agent
    q75agent 18 November 2017 14: 10 New
    0
    in Syria it is necessary to run in, so that any coalition and Israel does not live peacefully wink
    1. The comment was deleted.
  9. HEATHER
    HEATHER 18 November 2017 14: 24 New
    0
    As explained in Vega, during the first flight I DO NOT BELIEVE! Video where? I also caught fish on the Moon.
  10. Radikal
    Radikal 18 November 2017 14: 27 New
    +2
    "Plate" has become larger, or it seems to me? winked
  11. Zomanus
    Zomanus 18 November 2017 14: 28 New
    +4
    But I'm waiting for an analogue of the American Hokai.
    For in the Arctic, such aircraft are well needed.
    And not only there, for a propeller-driven airplane can hang in the air for hours.
  12. midshipman
    midshipman 18 November 2017 14: 45 New
    10
    Constantly the employees of the research institute, where I work, are currently traveling to Taganrog to debug their part of the system. I am glad that Evgeny Aleksandrovich (the head of work at our research institute on this subject) is a responsible specialist.
    And I had to lead the development of the entire system on the A-50. Ivanov V.P. and Brukhansky I.A. (then were the leaders of the current "Vega") were excellent specialists and responsible leaders. I remember my first flight on the A-50. That was a long time ago. I have the honor.
  13. BVS
    BVS 18 November 2017 14: 52 New
    +1
    Quote: Lord of the Sith
    And remember, there was news that in 2019 they will begin to fly, and mass production almost in 2021? I still argued that everything that we expect will not be later than 2018.

    And what was the shift, and mass production will begin earlier, in 2018? Or is it still not earlier than 2021? After all, the distance from the first take-off to mass production is large, for which there are examples, for example, Su-57 (factory index T-50).
  14. Beaster
    Beaster 18 November 2017 15: 15 New
    0
    It would be painted, at least, and it’s painful to look, as if from patches they blind.
    1. faiver
      faiver 18 November 2017 15: 30 New
      +5
      Well, thanks, at least they didn’t write that from the second color laughing
      usual thing the first instance flies without color ...
    2. IL-18
      IL-18 18 November 2017 17: 49 New
      +6
      Yeah, but if you painted, you would have written that the plane is not new - painted laughing
  15. Natalia777
    Natalia777 18 November 2017 15: 49 New
    0
    Russia is SUPER! And yet, despite dozens of military-technical innovations, I am sure that the most important superweapon of the latest and most unknown technologies to Russia is kept secret. It cannot be otherwise.
    1. Bronevick
      Bronevick 18 November 2017 17: 41 New
      +1
      And the apostle Andrew shouted: "I will leave the pier,
      If you don’t reveal the secret "
      And the teacher answered: "Calm, Andrew,
      There is no secret here. "
    2. serriy
      serriy 18 November 2017 18: 16 New
      0
      Russia keeps the most important superweapon of the latest and unknown technologies

      Exactly. good "The most important superweapon of the latest and most unknown technologies" is a big secret. As on the poster at the metallurgical plant - “OUR FORCE IS IN OUR SAILS!” drinks
      1. Golovan Jack
        Golovan Jack 18 November 2017 18: 40 New
        +8
        Quote: serriy
        "OUR POWER IS IN OUR SAILS!"

        And there is nothing to steal my slogan, ahem, alma mater ....

        MIIT (transport), for example, had the slogan "Every passenger has a soft spot" at the same time, svyaznjukov had "Communication without marriage", and here we had about swimming trunks, yes ...
  16. sg.nikolay
    sg.nikolay 18 November 2017 16: 42 New
    0
    all equipment on one face
  17. Rockerman
    Rockerman 18 November 2017 19: 25 New
    +2
    I advise you to look at the wingtips. Khibiny in the performance for the aircraft AWACS?
  18. foreman
    foreman 18 November 2017 21: 53 New
    +1
    newest!? day before yesterday !!!
  19. Radikal
    Radikal 18 November 2017 22: 57 New
    0
    The press service recalled that the A-100 was created on the basis of the Il-76MD-90A military transport aircraft,
    Strange - new, modern equipment, but the "carrier" is still the same. It seems that it was about the IL-96 - it has a larger internal volume, well, and a number of advantages, in particular comfort for the crew, and calculation. Who will speak out?
  20. turbris
    turbris 19 November 2017 11: 57 New
    0
    As I understand it, an aircraft can conduct not only aerial radar reconnaissance, but also conduct ground-based radar reconnaissance, monitor the ground (sea) radio-electronic situation - if this is so, then we get a multi-function reconnaissance and this is its main difference from the A-50. Given the vast size of our country, the ability to build up a radar field in threatened areas in a short time means a lot, therefore it is necessary for the Russian Aerospace Forces.
  21. The comment was deleted.
  22. The comment was deleted.
  23. The comment was deleted.