"Prince Vladimir" withdrawn from boathouse

66
On the eve of the ceremony of launching the lead missile submarine strategic cruiser of the Borey-A project. This is the nuclear submarine missile cruiser Prince Vladimir, which was withdrawn from the boathouse of the Sevmash shipyard in Severodvinsk. The ceremony was attended by Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Navy Admiral Vladimir Korolev, Governor of the Arkhangelsk Region Igor Orlov, representatives of the command of the White Sea Naval Base of the Navy, general director of the Central Design Bureau MT Rubin Igor Vilnit, general director of the Design Bureau Malakhit Vladimir Dorofeev and other officials. In addition, the ceremony was held with the participation of sailors of the North fleet and members of their families.

Department of Communications and Information MO RF cites the statement of the commander-in-chief of the Russian Navy:
The conclusion from the boathouse of the lead missile submarine cruiser Borey-A project "Prince Vladimir" is the result of the highest professionalism of the Sevmash shipbuilders, who create an oceanic nuclear missile shield here on Pomeranian land. It is symbolic and significant that this event opens the stage of preparation for the great historical date in the history of the Navy - the 60th anniversary of the Russian nuclear submarine fleet, which we will celebrate in 2018. It is also important to note that behind the Sevmash’s back 78 years of unique shipbuilding experience, 132 nuclear submarines, 41 diesel-electric ones. As an unrivaled example of the capabilities of your enterprise, the strategic nuclear missile cruiser Dmitry Donskoy took part in the Main Naval Parade in Kronstadt. The start of the construction of the Borey-A project nuclear submarine-rocket carriers is proof that the Russian school of submarine shipbuilding has maintained and is developing its best traditions, the foundation of which is brilliant work and the high responsibility of scientists, designers, shipbuilders. All this in combination allows you to keep up with scientific and technological progress, and often overtake it by several steps. We know what we need to successfully complete tasks at sea, and you build ships that allow us to effectively ensure a naval presence in the oceans. Thanks to this understanding, the equipment of the Russian Navy's strategic nuclear forces with modern submarines exceeded 80%.

Admiral Korolev added:
The creation and construction of a series of strategic missile submarines of the Borey-A project, and then the creation of the Borey-B submarines with the subsequent construction of 5 nuclear submarines of the X-th generation are justified by the provisions of the Marine Doctrine of Russia and aimed at maintaining the high level of equipment of strategic submarine groups in the Pacific and Northern fleets. This task was assigned to us by the Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation and we will carry it out.




According to the commander-in-chief of the Russian Navy, the St. Andrew’s flag is now seen in different points of the World Ocean: from the Arctic to southern latitudes. Korolev noted that if in the 2013 year the naval content of the warships of the fleet was 5,9 in thousands of days, then in an incomplete 2017 it surpassed the mark in 17 in thousands of hours. Held around 500 tactical exercises and training.

"Prince Vladimir" withdrawn from boathouse


Commander of the Russian Navy:
These figures indicate that we returned to the sea, as befits the Navy of the state with the longest sea border. Without selfless, responsible work of shipbuilders, this would be impossible!


Today, Sevmash is working on the creation of more 4-x serial nuclear submarines of the Borey-A project: Prince Oleg, Generalissimo Suvorov, Emperor Alexander III, Prince Pozharsky.
66 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +13
    18 November 2017 06: 30
    Well done. It is always a pleasure to read such news.
    1. +11
      18 November 2017 06: 49
      Quote: Black
      Well done. It is always a pleasure to read such news.

      Compare the carriers of the triad. World leader against gas stations
      Land-based ICBMs:
      - USA - LGM-30 Minuteman, the latter was produced in 1981;
      - Russia - 15P165M (mine) and 15P155M (mobile), are produced.
      SSBN:
      - USA - USS Louisiana (SSBN-743) of the Ohio type, launched on 23.10.1992/XNUMX/XNUMX;
      - Russia - "Prince Vladimir" type "Borey-A", launched on 17.11.2017/XNUMX/XNUMX.
      Aircraft missile carriers:
      - USA - B-52 Stratofortress, the last produced in October 1962;
      - Russia is a strategic missile carrier Tu-160, the last one was deflated on 16.11.2017/XNUMX/XNUMX.
      The number of deployed warheads as of September 30, 2017: 1393 to 1561.
      The production of warheads in the United States ceased in 1992.
      1. +3
        18 November 2017 07: 32
        the ax of war lies in the USA, we can take it out, take it away from the "partners".
      2. +2
        18 November 2017 08: 29
        This comparison is ridiculous.
        Compare the "flatness" of our submariners.
        The number of combat-ready long-range aircraft.
        1. +8
          18 November 2017 10: 13
          Quote: golikov
          Compare the "flatness" of our submariners.

          Do you have such data? If so .. is it strange that the CIA and the FSB are still not breaking your door?
        2. +6
          18 November 2017 11: 24
          Quote: golikov
          Compare the "flatness" of our submariners.

          Then it is better to compare laughing What does it give? Great moral fatigue and drug parties on board with light ladies? How recent scandal?
          Quote: golikov
          The number of combat-ready long-range aircraft.

          Neither B-2 nor B-1b are carriers of strategic air-based cruise missiles, therefore, even if they belong to the triad, they will not survive the entrance to our air defense zone. They carry free-falling bombs, guided bombs and short-range missiles. Their only strategic KR carrier is the B-52, we have the Tu-160 (16 pcs + 1), Tu-95 (60 pcs) and Tu-142 (27 pcs. The base model of the Tu-95RC). Well, the Tu22M3 will still be the carrier of strategic KR, and these machines are 62 pieces + 1 Tu22MR for 2017 and at least 30 pcs. until 2020 they will be upgraded to Tu-22M3M. The main thing is that the Tu-160 and TU-22M3 received a unified new engine NK-32-02
          More details: https://investfuture.ru/news/id/vsled-za-tu-160-v
          -rf-obnovyat-bombardirovshchiki-tu-22m3 © Investfuture.ru
      3. +6
        18 November 2017 08: 55
        Quote: hrych
        The production of warheads in the United States ceased in 1992.

        Destruction of warheads in Russia ceased in 2016
        What you won’t do for parity and for dear Comrade McCain
      4. +2
        18 November 2017 11: 10
        Quote: hrych
        Quote: Black
        Well done. It is always a pleasure to read such news.

        Compare the carriers of the triad. World leader against gas stations
        Land-based ICBMs:
        - USA - LGM-30 Minuteman, the latter was produced in 1981;
        - Russia - 15P165M (mine) and 15P155M (mobile), are produced.
        SSBN:
        - USA - USS Louisiana (SSBN-743) of the Ohio type, launched on 23.10.1992/XNUMX/XNUMX;
        - Russia - "Prince Vladimir" type "Borey-A", launched on 17.11.2017/XNUMX/XNUMX.
        Aircraft missile carriers:
        - USA - B-52 Stratofortress, the last produced in October 1962;
        - Russia is a strategic missile carrier Tu-160, the last one was deflated on 16.11.2017/XNUMX/XNUMX.
        The number of deployed warheads as of September 30, 2017: 1393 to 1561.
        The production of warheads in the United States ceased in 1992.

        stupid comparison.
        how many launchers like missile defense around Russia. and what they loaded we do not know.
        and Russia has no positions with such a short flight time to the United States.
        1. +4
          18 November 2017 11: 49
          Quote: ID90
          stupid comparison.
          how many launchers like missile defense around Russia. and what they loaded we do not know.
          and Russia has no positions with such a short flight time to the United States.

          There is no stupid comparison. How many missile defense systems around the Russian Federation we know, and they can only be loaded with the subsonic Tomahawk, which can fly to Moscow for more than an hour, and ICBMs can fly to New York for 20 minutes. From Boreev and Dolphins fly 10 minutes or less, depending on how close it is to the United States. From Pole to Washington less than 5,7 thousand km, ICBMs fly from 6 to 8 km per second, i.e. even from the Pole the ICBM flies to the US capital on average 800 seconds, i.e. minutes 13. Go ahead, gnaw at the pillar of science hi
          1. +1
            18 November 2017 16: 33
            Quote: hrych
            Quote: ID90
            stupid comparison.
            how many launchers like missile defense around Russia. and what they loaded we do not know.
            and Russia has no positions with such a short flight time to the United States.

            There is no stupid comparison. How many missile defense systems around the Russian Federation we know, and they can only be loaded with the subsonic Tomahawk, which can fly to Moscow for more than an hour, and ICBMs can fly to New York for 20 minutes. From Boreev and Dolphins fly 10 minutes or less, depending on how close it is to the United States. From Pole to Washington less than 5,7 thousand km, ICBMs fly from 6 to 8 km per second, i.e. even from the Pole the ICBM flies to the US capital on average 800 seconds, i.e. minutes 13. Go ahead, gnaw at the pillar of science hi

            respected.
            I read your comparison more carefully.
            yes lying and manipulating.
            Ohio was founded in 1992.
            and it was necessary to compare the B-52 with the Tu-95
      5. +5
        18 November 2017 11: 10
        Compare the carriers of the triad. World leader against gas stations

        Do not be like CNN. Compare the comparable.
        1) USA - LGM-30 Minuteman repeatedly underwent repairs and upgrades. According to characteristics as a solid fuel rocket, ours is not inferior. The weakness is only in the component of overcoming missile defense, which we, in contrast to the American, practically do not have.
        2) Ohio nuclear submarines undergo reconditioning repairs and rearmament with new missiles, some are retrained and converted into multipurpose ones with rearmament under cruise missiles. And by the way, there are 18 of them, not 3 like ours. "Prince Vladimir" handed over to the Navy will not be very soon. And UGM-133A Trident II (D5) so far is doing our "Mace-30" for most indicators except the possibility of starting during the movement of the submarine. Not to mention the unstable reliability of our rocket. Here is the "Blue" pleases, so there, and the generational boat is commensurate with the "Ohio"
        3) Compare the B-52 Stratofortress with our Tu-95. Be honest to the end. What we are stronger in is Tu-160, but you wrote about it in vain on 16.11.2017/XNUMX/XNUMX. He still has to go through a long test cycle after a long downtime of the plant’s facilities and they can come into operation not earlier than in a year. At the same time, several older cars will go into repair at once.
        4)
        The production of warheads in the United States ceased in 1992

        And for another ten years we will try to achieve the CWO of these American blocs.
        I'm not that not a patriot. But you have to be objective. Yes, we can fight back, but our nuclear forces are still inferior in some respects to the American ones. And plus we have a different structure of the nuclear component. Plus, we are very ahead in tactical nuclear weapons, while so far we are losing outright in terms of the number of cruise missiles.
        1. +7
          18 November 2017 11: 27
          Berkut24, if it’s shitty with us, why are they squandered?
          1. +6
            18 November 2017 12: 24
            Quote: sabakina
            Berkut24, if it’s shitty with us, why are they squandered?

            they have a principle ... laughing
            and not everything is wonderful here ...
            even in Soviet times there were pros and cons ... in some ways lagged behind, in some ways they circumvented.
            and now, besides, NATO needs to be taken into account ... they don’t need any special qualities;
            hi
            1. +1
              18 November 2017 14: 02
              Quote: Deadush
              they don’t need much quality either;

              Interestingly, how many NATO members will subscribe to die for the ambitions of a "superpower"? What can the very same Germany, France, Spain, Italy ... share with Russia because of what they can pop into the cauldron of nuclear war?
          2. +3
            18 November 2017 13: 21
            Quote: sabakina
            Berkut24, if it’s shitty with us, why are they squandered?

            The innate incontinence ....
            recourse
        2. +4
          18 November 2017 12: 22
          Quote: Berkut24
          ABM, which we, unlike the American, practically do not.

          Of course, of course, but the A-235 type is, but its type is not.
          Quote: Berkut24
          but our nuclear forces are still inferior in some respects to the American

          Which one? What are you saying? According to all indicators, throughout the line they are in full flight, or rather in complete. They completely have no mobiles, they failed Midjitman, there is no heavyweight, Peskiper is unsuccessful and removed from service, the BZHRK also could not do at all. We have mobile ones with separate individual guidance blocks, throwing tests of Barguzin and Sarmat. Heavyweight Voevoda still stands guard over the Motherland under fifty dollars of rockets, each capable of ending American statehood.
          Quote: Berkut24
          we lose outright by the number of cruise missiles.

          Their KR, that is, sea-based Tomahawks, which you have in mind and which really do not carry a nuclear charge an order of magnitude greater than ours, and therefore for your information, do not belong to strategic forces at all. All BGM-109A missiles were decommissioned under START-I in the early 1990s, as was their land modification BGM-109G Gryphon. Therefore, do not mislead yourself and others, the only strategic KR in the USA is the AGM-86 ALCM carried by the old B-52, because even the AGM-129 ACM has failed and since 2007 the missiles have been withdrawn from service. wassat And probably about our new CDs and that they were created specifically for nuclear modification.
          1. +4
            18 November 2017 15: 01
            Of course, of course, but the A-235 type is, but its type is not.

            They are "a bit" only around Moscow. Not intended for kinetic impact on the target - only a counter blast of a nuclear warhead. In the event of an attack on Moscow, dozens of nuclear explosions await us in the stratosphere above the city. It's all. I hope that the S-500 will correct the situation. If you are not a Muscovite, then consider that ABM is not for you.
            Which one? What are you saying? According to all indicators, throughout the line they are in full flight, or rather in complete.

            Damn, I wrote specifically for you - we and the USA have a different structure of nuclear forces. We have a pronounced terrestrial component and a little air. The Americans have the main strike component marine and medium aviation. We in the States mock mainly from our territory, to the States, taking into account the NATO countries, from our own borders. This is us in the ass now. Our flight time is 35 minutes versus 6 minutes with the Americans. Decision making time is critical here !!!
            Their KR, that is, sea-based Tomahawks, which you have in mind and which really do not carry a nuclear charge an order of magnitude greater than ours, and therefore for your information, do not belong to strategic forces at all. All BGM-109A missiles were decommissioned under START-I

            What they have is quite enough for the removal of the coastal defense structure. Americans never abided by the treaty. Tomorrow they will say that they are withdrawing from the treaty (as they have withdrawn from the ABM treaty) and the very next morning, 2000 nuclear heads from nowhere will appear in the Kyrgyz Republic. Launch missile defense systems in Poland are adapted for ground launch of the Kyrgyz Republic. We do not have access to test their missile defense for the diversification of products in launchers. Flight time to the Kaliningrad region is about a minute. Those. even there will be no time to make a decision and we will lose at once the entire defensive area. Do not entertain yourself with the thought that everything is fine at the border; look at the totality of facts. You can read any articles you want, but I graduated from a military school with a specialization in PRO / SPRN and look at all this from my perspective. No one will play with us under the rules and contracts. All that stops them is the inevitability of the answer. Now it is, again, in aggregate.
            But it will be the answer in the USA. If transnational corporations decide that they no longer need either the dollar or the United States with their debts and it is time to sweep the chess pieces off the chessboard due to the impending loss, then they will start the bucket without hesitation. The United States will receive the answer, and the assets of the richest families of the planet will peacefully survive in some Brazil and Australia, so that later they can buy up everything left for cheap and make money on restoring the little survivor.
            War - is a classic continuation of politics. And politics is a continuation of the economy. And the war has not ended for several millennia. It either goes into the hot phase, then returns to diplomacy. And so it will be until huge wealth is concentrated in the hands of a small number of people. It is they who declare each other wars, armistice and crises. They don’t care how many and what kind of missiles or planes and who. It is important that some countries can be used against others, the economy of one country against the economy of another.
            1. +2
              18 November 2017 15: 33
              Quote: Berkut24
              This is us in the ass now. Our flight time is 35 minutes versus 6 minutes with the Americans.

              You are possible. 3 Squids, 3 Boreas, 6 Dolphins say that our flight time of 6 minutes is available to us and the number of Ohio with the Trident-2 medium-range missile (according to rocket engineers), which is given out as an ICBM and which is truly their basis for the Triad, will not affect to our guaranteed strike, 12 boats of 16 missiles with separable blocks, although one salvo of one boat is enough for the destruction of the United States, China or the EU. Our PUs inland and geography provides ample time for a guaranteed answer ...
              The A-235 has a range of long-range missiles of one and a half thousand kilometers, so circle around Moscow in this radius and realize that the main population of the Russian Federation will be protected (though not from a massive attack, but the United States’s situation is even worse considering our maneuvering units)
              Quote: Berkut24
              and the very next morning, 2000 nuclear heads will appear from nowhere in the Kyrgyz Republic

              These are your dreams. There is the possibility of control officially and there is intelligence, and they have the President - a businessman, and we have a intelligence officer.
              Once again, do not fantasize about Kaliningrad, etc. A guaranteed answer is inevitable, why should they burn Kaliningrad, or take the Primorye to the Chinese, if their cities burn down unambiguously. And who told you that they will attack first? Why not us? laughing Our Doctrine is proactive, and not defensive, as in the USSR. Our fleet and coastal complexes are sharpened in order to create the frontier for the application of their systems and Caliber, Onyx and Zircon, together with aviation, they are able to restrain the enemy.
              Quote: Berkut24
              and the assets of the richest families of the planet will peacefully survive in some Brazil and Australia

              You do not understand the main thing, wealth is now not green cut paper, not zeros in computers, and not even gold, now it is a valuable metal for industry, well, a means of decorating light women. In besieged St. Petersburg, it was impossible to exchange a bag of potatoes for diamond earrings. Nowadays, the main wealth is made up of wells and places of extraction of energy carriers and raw materials, plants and manufactures matter, transportation transport capacities above the indicated ones, i.e. raw materials and energy in one direction and finished goods in the opposite. Those. transport arteries. We control most of the planet’s resources, build competitive transport routes that control the United States (maritime), and production from the Golden Billion goes to China, at least consumer goods. And what is this super-duper elite hiding in Brazil? With gold bars? With chopped paper? All their assets, all their power in mining, transport and production. And what will they do in Selva? Contemplate each other's faces laughing This theory is untenable. And when the World Order collapses, their superpower collapses, but they still have power and wealth, although patriots will destroy them over time, including and America.
              1. +2
                18 November 2017 16: 13
                1) But I didn’t even talk about cut paper. In the world, almost all companies in one way or another belong to the 500 richest families. In the early 90s in our country, state assets systematically passed into the hands of some "new Russians", who suddenly had hundreds of millions of dollars in their hands for these purchases. Is that their money? No. This money was given from behind a hill. Our "oligarchs" are just temporary stewards of real masters. And so around the world.
                2) And yet, stop referring to A-235. This is some kind of trouble! "Nudol" is not in service. The S-500, which it should be part of, is also not in service. There are no these missiles. There are A-125 around Moscow, and focus on them. Everything else is the hope that it will work as it should, there will be positive test statistics and by the 20th year they will adopt the first complex.
                1. +3
                  18 November 2017 16: 46
                  Quote: Berkut24
                  stop referencing A-235

                  Then do not refer to the American missile defense system, it did not further advance the same A-135, which had long been on duty and smoothly transferred to the A-235. What do we have worse SPRN radars? No ours are superior. Let them hook at least Ynraketu, who flies over Japan, then let's talk about their achievements.
                  Quote: Berkut24
                  Our "oligarchs" are just temporary stewards of real masters

                  Putin's nationalization took place, although many didn’t get it, Gusinsky, Abramovich, Khodorkovsky were thrown out of the country by the poor, two sniffed a bucket, one died the death of the brave. And these were the richest. They could not carry plants, wells and television channels abroad. Sibneft, Yukos entered the state structures of Rosneft, Gazprom, etc. Deribaska, Vekselberg with golden eggs Faberge and Potanin adopted the rules of the game of GDP, adopted the relevant laws, Sakhalin-1 and Sakhalin-2 were taken away from the Americans. Off-topic and a long history, but the counter-revolution and counter-privatization in the Russian Federation have been carried out, almost all the main assets with plants, wells, transport and banks have been nationalized, secretly or explicitly. There was a period that Muscovites bought up factories throughout the Russian Federation, the state secretly bought it out. The banking system closed on two banks with a controlling stake in the state - Sberbank and VTB, the rest depend on them. And so on, I repeat, a long history is off topic, but a number of reforms have been implemented, Putin’s agricultural holdings have led the Russian Federation to the leading exporters of millet, agricultural products exceeded arms exports, and it is second only to the United States. Soloviev, Satanovsky crowed in a patriotic spirit on TV, although Kabbalists and Zionists laughing and do not hide it. And so on and so forth. Ukrainians were just unlucky for you, there was no such leader, although the starting opportunities were almost perfect.
                  1. +1
                    18 November 2017 21: 41
                    Then do not refer to the American missile defense system, it did not further advance the same A-135, which had long been on duty and smoothly transferred to the A-235. What do we have worse SPRN radars? No ours are superior.

                    You can carry on nonsense further, but not to me. I repeat - this is my specialty, I know it from the inside.
                    You Ukrainians were simply unlucky, there was no such leader, although the starting opportunities were almost perfect.

                    ??? I finished the service at the Kapustin Yar training ground. And he quit in the suburbs, from where he went to school and entered in the distant 1983 ...
                    They had fun about agricultural holdings, and now I work with these agricultural holdings and with banks lending to them. Question did not try to study deeper?
                    1. 0
                      18 November 2017 21: 54
                      Quote: Berkut24
                      You can carry on nonsense further, but not to me. I repeat - this is my specialty, I know it from the inside.

                      What are we saying wassat And why not in the topic then about 68 53T6 missiles standing on duty, Don-2 radar, long-range missiles A-925 replacing 51T6 that are being removed from duty, with five successful launches laughing

                      Quote: Berkut24
                      ??? I finished the service at the Kapustin Yar training ground. And he quit in the suburbs, from where he went to school and entered in the distant 1983 ...

                      So it was necessary to drive with a bang for the discrepancy wassat Although someone needs to scrub the floors and peel potatoes wassat
                      Quote: Berkut24
                      They had fun about agricultural holdings, and now I work with these agricultural holdings and with banks lending to them. Question did not try to study deeper?

                      There is no need to study here, however, import substitution, however, export, however, the shelves are bursting with grub wassat
                    2. 0
                      18 November 2017 22: 13
                      No missile defense, but Shoigu visits him wassat
                      http://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/4539059
                      1. +2
                        19 November 2017 12: 56
                        Take a flag, go to a demonstration, sing a hymn in front of the Kremlin. Maybe it’s better. Better yet, serve in the army - it really helps inveterate optimists to correct their brains and make them pragmatists.
                    3. +1
                      19 November 2017 18: 00
                      Quote: Berkut24
                      Take a flag, go to a demonstration, sing a hymn in front of the Kremlin. Maybe it’s better. Better yet, serve in the army - it really helps inveterate optimists to correct their brains and make them pragmatists.

                      It’s your tradition to ride and ride wassat What should I serve if 25 years of service will be in the summer of 2018 wassat You can’t convince your brother of anything, even take the Crimea, even the Caucasus Range, even destroy the Caliphate, Russia is always bad for you. At least launch the fourth nuclear missile carrier into the water, at least release the hundredth Yars. Therefore, there is actually nothing to talk to you about, your arguments are running out, tantrums begin. Build your independence until we come drinks
      6. +6
        18 November 2017 12: 17
        Quote: hrych
        Compare the carriers of the triad. World leader against gas stations

        Invalid comparison ... request
        "throw caps" begin
        and you forgot about the amount ... Yes
        1. +5
          18 November 2017 12: 35
          Quote: Deadush
          "throw caps" begin

          Not with caps, but with war blocks laughing
          Quote: Deadush
          You forgot about the amount

          No, I haven’t forgotten, here are the data of American nuclear scientists for 2012

          But they are not able to calculate our tactical nuclear charges, they did not fall under the treaty, 40 thousand units were produced in the USSR belay including nuclear artillery shells, free-falling bombs, mines, torpedoes and tactical missile blocks. It is believed that there are now from 5 to 25 thousand, and how many are actually a secret laughing And especially protected. BB ICBM on the contrary, enemy controllers were allowed to this topic, sort of like laughing .
          1. +4
            18 November 2017 13: 33
            and the most interesting and did not count - the technique Yes
            ships, planes, tanks, etc.
            the advantage will not be in our direction and rather big.
            and bch nonsense turns out ... request

            https://ria.ru/infografika/20160829/1475498691.ht
            ml
            and even then, not considering that the Yankers love to hide and lie
            1. +3
              18 November 2017 13: 55
              We are hiding and no less. We have the most tanks combined, including China and the United States with Britain. And I brought you an authoritative source - their newsletter, which has been issued since 1945, and what are you ..., a picture ...

              But the ships have nothing to compare, we are a continental power, they are maritime, their ships of our firmament are not terribly terrible, except Ohio and that’s all. On land, we cut them like a pig, especially taking into account armored vehicles and nuclear weapons. In short, alarmists already have enough to fly with fear. The Russian Federation is the most powerful state, and even this is not clear to you. And our main advantage is strategic nuclear forces and tactical nuclear weapons, everything else is nonsense, including aviation, ships, armored vehicles and, of course, the number of personnel.
              1. +5
                18 November 2017 14: 17
                you bring pictures too, especially for the 12 year ... and from the AiF, and not the newsletter ... and "the office also writes" request
                recalls the beginning of 40's ... little blood on the territory of the enemy ...
                you can continue to enjoy our greatness
                1. +2
                  18 November 2017 14: 59
                  Quote: Deadush
                  you can continue to enjoy our greatness

                  Do not believe me, listen to the Supreme, if you do not believe him, I suggest making sepuku, and not wait for defeat laughing ... pay attention to the key phrase "... geography ..."
                  1. +1
                    18 November 2017 16: 41
                    Quote: hrych
                    Quote: Deadush
                    you can continue to enjoy our greatness

                    Do not believe me, listen to the Supreme, if you do not believe him, I suggest making sepuku, and not wait for defeat laughing ... pay attention to the key phrase "... geography ..."

                    and listen while standing? laughing and every pause ku talk? laughing
                    1. +5
                      19 November 2017 12: 48
                      Quote: ID90
                      and listen while standing? and every pause ku talk?

                      prostrate and knock on the floor with his head in a fit of passion ...
                      if the head before this is not spinning from the greatness of the state (as in Khrych)
                      1. 0
                        19 November 2017 18: 08
                        Quote: Deadush
                        if the head before this is not spinning from the greatness of the state (as in Khrych)

                        Do not touch me better, Girl, I really trudge from Caliber, the fourth Borea, the hundredth Yars, the new White Swan, satellite constellation, the first place in the export of millet and oil, from victories over Georgians, Bandera, daishaks. And most importantly, for some reason I am not at all ashamed of this. And you only on Navalny and other losers pray and weaken laughing With what I congratulate drinks
    2. +2
      18 November 2017 07: 56
      Quote: Black
      Well done. It is always a pleasure to read such news.

      It’s somehow calmer at heart, Russia is alive and developing! drinks
      1. jjj
        +2
        18 November 2017 11: 47
        "Azukh" in the second reincarnation. Next up is the Beeches. Interestingly, will it come to new BDRMs?
    3. +2
      18 November 2017 14: 13
      Korolev noted that if in 2013 the flooding of naval warships was 5,9 thousand days, then for incomplete 2017 it exceeded the milestone of 17 thousand hours.
      Quote: Black
      Well done. It is always a pleasure to read such news.

      5.9 thousand days is equal to 141600 hours. And the milestone is 17000 hours.
      What makes you happy?
      Eight "stupid pluses"?
      Well then, Uriayayaya!
      1. +2
        18 November 2017 16: 25
        Quote: devis
        Korolev noted that if in 2013 the flooding of naval warships was 5,9 thousand days, then for incomplete 2017 it exceeded the milestone of 17 thousand hours.
        Quote: Black
        Well done. It is always a pleasure to read such news.

        5.9 thousand days is equal to 141600 hours. And the milestone is 17000 hours.
        What makes you happy?
        Eight "stupid pluses"?
        Well then, Uriayayaya!

        You can cry. Proceed. crying The louder the cry, the closer your "victory". crying
        And the Russians have always preferred “Hurray,” and so are the Winners.
    4. Maz
      0
      18 November 2017 14: 18
      Work Brothers!
  2. +1
    18 November 2017 06: 33
    Good news. It’s bad that this submarine will not be able to display the St. Andrew’s flag at different points in the ocean. Due to its secrecy .. bully BUT! Let the horror be thoughtful!
    1. +2
      18 November 2017 14: 14
      Quote: 210ox
      Good news. It’s bad that this submarine will not be able to display the St. Andrew’s flag at different points in the ocean. Due to its secrecy .. bully BUT! Let the horror be thoughtful!

      Urya !!!!!!!
      1. 0
        18 November 2017 19: 55
        Hmm, are sick .. ?? .... belay
  3. +4
    18 November 2017 06: 33
    How, Ukrainians have not yet protested?
    1. +1
      18 November 2017 06: 36
      Nope, So far, only the Swedes and the Baltic states. lolOh! not right. Only the Swedes. The Baltic states were concerned about the Tu-160M2.
    2. +1
      18 November 2017 06: 37
      What a protest. So they don’t have a fleet?
      1. +5
        18 November 2017 06: 55
        Quote: 210ox
        What a protest. So they don’t have a fleet?

        No, they claim that Prince Vladimir was an ukrom.
        1. +2
          18 November 2017 06: 57
          They don’t claim it anymore. The cruise ship "Prince Vladimir" already runs. They even renamed their unfinished corvette with gritting teeth .. And they also wanted to call Vladimir.
          Quote: kos2910
          Quote: 210ox
          What a protest. So they don’t have a fleet?

          No, they claim that Prince Vladimir was an ukrom.
    3. +1
      18 November 2017 14: 18
      Quote: kos2910
      How, Ukrainians have not yet protested?

      5.9 thousand days is equal to 141600 hours. And the milestone is 17000 hours.
      Probably counted.
  4. +2
    18 November 2017 06: 41
    Seven feet under the keel! drinks
  5. 0
    18 November 2017 06: 49
    Are there many of them in the series? A dozen are needed, and no less.
    1. +1
      18 November 2017 10: 01
      Well so will Borey-B yet.
  6. +1
    18 November 2017 07: 32
    And what kind of "first" lady broke champagne?
  7. +1
    18 November 2017 07: 37
    Big ship - a big sail !!! drinks
  8. +2
    18 November 2017 08: 55
    Touched by a photo of a burdened priest, the main worker. Without his work, this would not have been possible!
    1. +2
      18 November 2017 14: 26
      Quote: Vasya Vassin
      Touched by a photo of a burdened priest, the main worker. Without his work, this would not have been possible!

      A photo of the priest, separately?
      But you are not upset that the country is Orthodox, and with this, is there an inalienable tradition (rite)?
      1. 0
        18 November 2017 14: 38
        But in general. Do you remember such a tale: What a pop, such a parish.
        So today everything is upside down.
        What a parish, such are the priests.
        And let someone convince me of this. (Ministers on Lexus !! Mersah !! ..... and then hamsvo ... But in Lada is not comfortable?)
        (I do not pour offended water).
      2. +1
        18 November 2017 16: 44
        Quote: devis
        Quote: Vasya Vassin
        Touched by a photo of a burdened priest, the main worker. Without his work, this would not have been possible!

        A photo of the priest, separately?
        But you are not upset that the country is Orthodox, and with this, is there an inalienable tradition (rite)?

  9. +2
    18 November 2017 09: 20
    Quote: Vasya Vassin
    Touched by a photo of a burdened priest, the main worker. Without his work, this would not have been possible!

    it’s impossible without it ... Normal pop. A beautiful boat! I wonder how it is in terms of quiet running?
  10. +4
    18 November 2017 12: 07
    The beauty! Though from Aviation, the beauty of submarines is not inferior to our cars!
    1. +1
      18 November 2017 16: 22
      Quote: VERESK
      the beauty of submarines is not inferior to our cars

      A pair of plates was interrupted by a hand-made koklaughing From the Barents Sea to Kamchatka, about 6 thousand kilometers, Mace flew less than 20 minutes, which corresponds to the distance from Murmansk to New York laughing well, plus or minus a couple of hundred kilometers, over a minute ICBM flies more than 400 km. Those. from Severomorsk from the pier to New York fly 20 minutes and no half an hour good
  11. Maz
    +3
    18 November 2017 14: 21
    Quote: devis
    Korolev noted that if in 2013 the flooding of naval warships was 5,9 thousand days, then for incomplete 2017 it exceeded the milestone of 17 thousand hours.
    Quote: Black
    Well done. It is always a pleasure to read such news.

    5.9 thousand days is equal to 141600 hours. And the milestone is 17000 hours.
    What makes you happy?
    Eight "stupid pluses"?
    Well then, Uriayayaya!

    We are pleased that our Fleet is able to calm down any minor misunderstanding on the globe with one stroke of the screw. And with one spit, they can erase this misunderstanding if they poorly understand the patient attitude and perceive good nature as weakness.
  12. +2
    18 November 2017 16: 27
    Yesterday I read this news and in the evening after work I noted the second toast. Continue again today? drinks
  13. +1
    18 November 2017 18: 59
    Quote: Berkut24
    1) But I didn’t even talk about cut paper. In the world, almost all companies in one way or another belong to the 500 richest families. In the early 90s in our country, state assets systematically passed into the hands of some "new Russians", who suddenly had hundreds of millions of dollars in their hands for these purchases. Is that their money? No. This money was given from behind a hill. Our "oligarchs" are just temporary stewards of real masters. And so around the world.
    2) And yet, stop referring to A-235. This is some kind of trouble! "Nudol" is not in service. The S-500, which it should be part of, is also not in service. There are no these missiles. There are A-125 around Moscow, and focus on them. Everything else is the hope that it will work as it should, there will be positive test statistics and by the 20th year they will adopt the first complex.


    Yah? In May 16, even exercises with the airborne forces were conducted, with missile launches. And the s-500 has nothing to do with the A-235. The missiles are different, the s-500 will complement it. But that officially does not stand in service does not mean that it is not It’s just that she’s still on combat duty. They’ll bring it to mind, prepare the documentation and that’s all. In the meantime, Amur can cope with covering the territory where almost half of the country lives. Only unlike the mythical missile defense of the United States, they are guaranteed to destroy flying missiles, since they’re using apple. And a high-altitude nuclear explosion will not harm the ground infrastructure and people, there is no radioactive contamination of the area, there may be maximum problems with radio communications due to electromagnetic radiation, but even at such an explosion height is not a fact.
  14. 0
    18 November 2017 20: 03
    An excellent occasion to drink a glass .. and for the health of others, and for the peace of the distant. Accents put yourself in the measure of corruption.
  15. 0
    19 November 2017 07: 54
    "if in 2013 the flooding of the warships of the fleet was 5,9 thousand days, then for incomplete 2017 it exceeded the milestone of 17 thousand hours" if I can count, then 17 thousand hours is 708,3 days. Is something not growing together or am I misunderstanding something?
  16. The comment was deleted.
  17. +4
    20 November 2017 14: 39
    hrych,
    but what comments are we deleting, "the truth hurts my eyes" ... or are the "cleaners" trying as friends?
    Nobody has yet canceled freedom of speech in the country Yes