Military Review

The first batch of upgraded flamethrower systems TOC-1А is ready for the transfer of the Russian Ministry of Defense

25
Omsk Transport Engineering Plant (Omsktransmash, as part of Uralvagonzavod JSC, part of Rostec State Corporation), by order of the Russian Ministry of Defense, upgraded heavy flamethrower systems TOC-1А, their first batch will be transferred to the military before the end of the month. This was reported on Friday by the press service of the enterprise.


The first batch of upgraded flamethrower systems TOC-1А is ready for the transfer of the Russian Ministry of Defense


The Omsk Transport Engineering Plant commissioned the Ministry of Defense to upgrade its TOS-1A heavy flame-thrower systems. The changes affected both the appearance and the internal equipment of combat vehicles. The first batch of upgraded TOC-1А will be sent to the customer by the end of the month
- said in a statement.

The press service clarified that the flamethrower itself received a new launcher, and the transport-loading vehicle of the complex received a crane installation. Experienced overhaul of TOC-1A "Omsktransmash" performed last year and as a result received permission from the Ministry of Defense to overhaul military vehicles.

TOS-1A - the most mobile, protected and powerful flamethrower system in the world based on the chassis tank T-72, designed to disable lightly armored and automotive vehicles, set fire to and destroy structures and buildings, destroy enemy manpower, reports TASS
Photos used:
RIA News
25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Bronevick
    Bronevick 17 November 2017 14: 14
    +5
    Awesome weapon.
    1. Warrior-80
      Warrior-80 17 November 2017 22: 55
      +2
      I don’t understand that everyone is worn with this “sunshine” and an effective weapon in its niche against entrenched barmaley, but its range is at the level of a peter, I’m not talking about if the enemy’s counter battery covers it, in general, as they say here today, it’s a weapon against the Papuans
      1. LAWNER
        LAWNER 18 November 2017 13: 04
        +1
        8 km ATGM does not hit ..... But if you "cross" Solntspek "and" Polonaise "...... 300 km (radius) and 300-caliber .... I want to look at the counter-battery protection
  2. esaul
    esaul 17 November 2017 14: 17
    +3
    "I am tormented by vague doubts" (c) - are minke whales, together with all NATO brains, not able to "tear apart" TOS? After all, thermobaric shells are in service! Specialists, briefly explain. The Chinese, after all, our more technologically advanced models are successfully torn apart and not steamed.
    1. destination
      destination 17 November 2017 14: 28
      +3
      So, they don’t consider it necessary, because it’s a melee weapon in which any peasant like me, for example, will pick up and burn this wunderwafel in the back of the kitchen gardens.
      1. hrych
        hrych 17 November 2017 14: 43
        11
        Quote: destination
        any peasant

        Turn into fried meat wassat There is a tactic for using weapons systems, moreover, I’ll tell you a secret that they are armed with parts of the RBM, i.e. burn out the infected area from any mold, solve mine clearance problems, etc. implies that the peasant is already overwhelmed by mustard gas wassat And also the range was increased, a little like that, but the ATGMs were exceeded, in order to approach the launch range of the bazooka, the peasant liquefied and mixed with a plastic pipe wassat Also, the doctrine of the USSR, implied a tank attack of the T-72, air defense on the basis of the T-72, TOS on the basis of the T-72 because it is the best means of protection against all the parasitic factors of weapons of mass destruction, well, and tracked all-terrain vehicle. I repeat, protection is not from enemy fire, but from chemistry, bacteria, radiation, light radiation, etc. But burning barmaley is like an unexpected bonus. good
        1. destination
          destination 17 November 2017 14: 49
          +4
          smile Do you believe in it yourself? I know all the folds of my locality, I’ll get to you so that no one hears you. You will get to know everything quietly and peacefully, like you never were ... wink Plastuns we ...
          1. hrych
            hrych 17 November 2017 14: 58
            +8
            Quote: destination
            I know all the folds of my terrain

            Here is the mustard gas on folds and go wassat
            Quote: destination
            Plastuns we ...

            Against the vigorous bonba, it’s certainly difficult, but if you learn a little manenko, then you can ... wassat drinks
            1. destination
              destination 17 November 2017 15: 30
              +3
              1-1. There is no arguing against the atomic bomb. drinks hi
              1. Going
                Going 17 November 2017 15: 52
                +9
                Quote: esaul
                "I am tormented by vague doubts" (c) - are minke whales, together with all NATO brains, not able to "tear apart" TOS? After all, thermobaric shells are in service! Specialists, briefly explain. The Chinese, after all, our more technologically advanced models are successfully torn apart and not steamed.


                I'm not special. , but the shooter is easy to copy, the whole point is in the shell, but it is not copied.
                1. svp67
                  svp67 17 November 2017 15: 58
                  +3
                  Quote: Going
                  I'm not special. , but the shooter is easy to copy, the whole point is in the shell, but it is not copied.

                  I beg of you. In its design there is nothing that experts do not know. Here the question is different. As this system, I mean our TOS will be applied. By and large, they must be made unmanned, since due to the large geometric dimensions and unmasking factors, as well as because of the not very long range, these systems are VERY vulnerable.
                  Each of their successful combat use is a whole military operation involving a large number of other units of ground and special forces
            2. Warrior-80
              Warrior-80 17 November 2017 23: 07
              0
              I read about the newcomer 9 (chemical weapons) here the other day, and was not sure that nuclear weapons are the most formidable in the world, if the effect of it is such as they are written on the Internet, then it can in certain cases argue with yao
      2. NEXUS
        NEXUS 17 November 2017 18: 01
        +4
        Quote: destination
        This is a melee weapon.

        Melee weapons are AK or RPG-7 ... and here the range is 6 km. In the new TOSOCHKA flamethrower system, the range will be increased several times ... there is an assumption, at least Grad will.
    2. JD1979
      JD1979 17 November 2017 15: 08
      +1
      Too simple, too cheap, too fast to do. No comparison with the F-35 in terms of funding and development time.
    3. Setrac
      Setrac 18 November 2017 21: 36
      +1
      Quote: esaul
      "I am tormented by vague doubts" (c) - are minke whales, together with all NATO brains, not able to "tear apart" TOS?

      They do not need them, in the war against terrorists they are on the other side of the front line, they help terrorists, and they do not roll these weapons against the regular army.
  3. Jedi
    Jedi 17 November 2017 14: 18
    +8
    TOS-1A - the most mobile, protected and powerful flamethrower system in the world based on the chassis of the T-72 tank, designed to disable lightly armored and automotive vehicles, arson and destruction of structures and buildings, destruction of enemy manpower, reports TASS

    Something I strongly doubt that the tank that fell under the TOS-1A thermobaric ammunition will survive. At least his crew. Who in the subject - tell me.
    1. esaul
      esaul 17 November 2017 14: 26
      +4
      Quote: Jedi
      TOS-1A - the most mobile, protected and powerful flamethrower system in the world based on the chassis of the T-72 tank, designed to disable lightly armored and automotive vehicles, arson and destruction of structures and buildings, destruction of enemy manpower, reports TASS

      Something I strongly doubt that the tank that fell under the TOS-1A thermobaric ammunition will survive. At least his crew. Who in the subject - tell me.

      Judging by the fact that the information previously found in the sources about the purpose of the TOCs, it was said that it was intended to destroy the enemy "... in protected shelters" similarly with tanks.
      1. 73bor
        73bor 17 November 2017 22: 49
        +1
        Destruction of any targets is rather a pleasant bonus, as well as a means of areal burning of OM on the way of troops!
    2. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 17 November 2017 15: 15
      +1
      This moment also surprises me!
  4. Herculesic
    Herculesic 17 November 2017 14: 18
    +1
    In how, how long have they been adopted, and here is modernization !!! hi By the way, it looks in reality more impressive than in a photo or video! !!!!! good
  5. Slovak
    Slovak 17 November 2017 15: 01
    +2
    As humanitarian aid, it is necessary to donate them to the DNI and LC. On the farm, how come in handy!
  6. Dead duck
    Dead duck 17 November 2017 15: 18
    +6
    The next stage of modernization is to install a nuclear mini-charge in each missile. winked
    1. rruvim
      rruvim 17 November 2017 15: 46
      0
      It is better to install unwinding tubes connected to the Power of Siberia in each launch vehicle. It will burn for a long time, 50 years ... fellow
  7. Former battalion commander
    Former battalion commander 18 November 2017 11: 42
    0
    I doubt the effectiveness of this weapon ... The shells are expensive, their efficiency is small, the installation itself is not logical in design. Not a protected box with missiles and a super secure and overweight chassis. Where is the point? It can’t be put into the attacking chain in any way, so why is the hull from the tank? Excessive and unused weight is a sign of incompetence of the designer or customer. This design can be justified only by the presence of a large number of free and deductible hulls from tanks. But also do not seriously rely on the use of junk.
    1. hydrox
      hydrox 18 November 2017 21: 47
      0
      Quote: Former battalion commander
      But this is not to seriously rely on the use of junk.


      The most frivolous thing is what you do: rely on the bottomlessness of the Russian budget.
      Your second frivolity is ignoring the overturning moment and the rocking of the launch system during volley launches of three hundred millimeter drifts. Or do you think that a motor league has the resource and maneuverability to carry a 15-ton tower?
      And the last, almost unprintable :: Shells are flying so slowly that the response can arrive even before the end of the salvo - or can your wife recover the loss of calculation in a week or two? lol