Strange rating International SOS. Danger level for tourists around the world

53
Company International SOS released a report on the subject of forecasting safe visits to various countries of the world next year. The report is visualized by a map, on which each country is indicated by a shade of one of five colors: red - the most dangerous; orange - high level of danger, yellow - medium level of danger, green - safe; lilac - countries with varying levels of danger to tourists.

The main emphasis in the preparation was placed on the provision of medical care and the general level of security when visiting countries.



The most secure countries are Iceland, Finland and Norway. Somalia, Syria, South Sudan, Mali, Afghanistan, Libya, Yemen, North Korea, Haiti and some others are among the most dangerous.

Ukraine, for example, is classified in the group of countries according to the “average level of danger”. According to the compilers of the rating, is it safer and much better with medical care in Ukraine than in Kazakhstan, Armenia or Mongolia?

Strange rating International SOS. Danger level for tourists around the world


Practically all EU countries, including France, which in recent years has been confronted with a series of terrorist acts, are among the safest, and the number of carriers of various infections from Africa and the Middle East has increased several times over the past few years. Authors of the rating attributed the United States to the safest countries for visiting by tourists, where mass executions at concerts, in churches, and acts of terrorism at sports competitions are becoming the norm of today.

Russia and China are listed as countries with “variable risks.”
53 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +17
    17 November 2017 11: 45
    Of course, how could it be otherwise, the United States is all in the green. And the fact that people are being shot there like mad dogs, not only on the street, but in schools, at concerts, and even in church. This is their norm. fool
    1. +18
      17 November 2017 11: 49
      Quote: askort154
      Of course, how could it be otherwise, the United States is all in the green.

      not correctly painted - the states should be in white - a white hoodie to them so to face
      1. +8
        17 November 2017 12: 01
        And are Egypt green with Turkey? Well, yes, then the map was painted correctly ...
        1. +6
          17 November 2017 12: 14
          Quote: destination
          And are Egypt green with Turkey? Well, yes, then the map was painted correctly ...

          strange revolution in Egypt is orange, and the country is green request
          1. +2
            17 November 2017 15: 58
            Quote: Partyzan
            the revolution in Egypt is orange and the country is green

            Watch carefully. Egypt in yellow. Although, what difference does it make, radish horseradish is not sweeter.
      2. +2
        17 November 2017 12: 41
        and white slippers ...
        1. +4
          17 November 2017 12: 56
          Quote: Slovak
          and white slippers ...

          you supplemented correctly
      3. +2
        17 November 2017 12: 42
        Or maybe the states are better in blue? laughing
        Quote: Partyzan
        Quote: askort154
        Of course, how could it be otherwise, the United States is all in the green.

        not correctly painted - the states should be in white - a white hoodie to them so to face
      4. +2
        17 November 2017 13: 00
        Quote: Partyzan
        not painted correctly - the states should be in white

        With brown bloopers ... so% 80-90 off white ...
      5. +2
        17 November 2017 16: 21
        Quote: Partyzan
        not painted correctly


        The main thing here is not who said what, but who calculated what was said. And the calculation was carried out by the RIGHT people (receiving salaries from the center - USA. WORLDWIDE REACH. HUMAN TOUCH), hence the red, yellow and green. fellow
    2. +1
      17 November 2017 12: 05
      And without insurance, no one will render medical assistance in the USA, well, or fly into a penny.
      1. +2
        17 November 2017 16: 00
        Quote: Azazelo
        And without insurance, no one will render medical assistance in the USA, well, or fly into a penny.

        When you open a state visit visa, honey. insurance is required. In my opinion so.
    3. +1
      17 November 2017 15: 56
      Earlier in New York, on the street, in broad daylight, on the sidewalk, a terrorist crushed tourists from Argentina. Let this “rating” be now shown to their relatives.
  2. +3
    17 November 2017 11: 47
    Russia and China are listed as countries with “variable risks.”

    What is wrong with security? Like terrorism, unlike Europe, where from time to time something explodes, we do not. In China, the same kind of quiet. At the expense of medicine, well, not everything is going smoothly, but I would not say that it’s really bad, except for the fact that the ambulance does not arrive as fast as I wanted. The compilers blundered a little. The rating needs to be reviewed a bit.
    1. +9
      17 November 2017 11: 55
      Quote: solzh
      What is wrong with security?


      Don't look right, politically illiterate.

      It will take someone to influence the number of tourists in Russia - they will announce an increased level of danger.

      Hence the uncertain status
      1. +4
        17 November 2017 12: 45
        As usual, all these ratings are divorced from reality. It seems that the people who make up these ratings live in their parallel reality.
    2. +2
      17 November 2017 16: 43
      Quote: solzh
      unlike Europe, where from time to time something explodes, we do not.

      In the St. Petersburg subway, did the air conditioner rush? In the Caucasus, have they stopped killing guards and storming houses?
      It's hard to say in China, there is no information. Only with the Uighurs I know for sure.
  3. +10
    17 November 2017 11: 48
    Why collect informational garbage around the world and dump it on VO pages? That is my question ...

    On garbage topics it’s always crowded and much-commented !!! .... (practice shows)
  4. +4
    17 November 2017 11: 48
    American daily executions and French monthly terrorist attacks are "poor", as in a kindergarten.
  5. BAI
    +4
    17 November 2017 11: 55
    And what is "variable risk"? Is it safe for someone, someone is not, or is it safe today, tomorrow is not?
    1. +4
      17 November 2017 12: 01
      I met a bear in the forest - it is life-threatening, in the city it is doubly dangerous (and in the drum, which is in the zoo). And if you don’t go to the forest and zoo, then it’s safe. Total average: variable hazard. Well, somehow, probably.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  6. +7
    17 November 2017 11: 58
    But in / in Ukraine it’s safe, as in Greenland. A civil war is going on in the country, periodically fascists of various sorts blow up and shoot each other across the country, and it is generally unrealistic to receive normal medical care.
  7. +3
    17 November 2017 12: 02
    And why did the author care so much about Ukraine? Does he have a complex in relation to this country? Why not Belarus or Moldova? And how does he characterize his disagreement with Russia's rating? With the fact that everything is fine with medicine in Moscow? So let it ride through the regions. Safely? Also a moot point. You can call areas in Moscow where it is better not to walk alone in the evening. As for me, everything is fair.
    1. +1
      17 November 2017 13: 10
      What area is unsafe in Moscow? At least one fantasy, for fun.
      1. +2
        17 November 2017 13: 36
        Personally, Konkovo ​​and Chertanovo are alarming me. Well, I don’t like them, that's all! Here for you, by the way, I copied the map:
        1. +2
          17 November 2017 14: 24
          Nonsense in a square, Kapotnya is safe, and Tverskaya and Presnensky is dangerous, you yourself are not funny. laughing As for the likes / dislikes, I really like Chertanovo, and Konkovo ​​is a normal area, obviously no worse than Biryulyovo. Most large markets are either withdrawn / or closed. In addition, no one forces you to forcefully climb Izmailovsky Park at night, although for some reason it seems to me that it is better not to walk in the parks in New York, London, or Berlin at night.
          1. +3
            17 November 2017 15: 36
            You look at him in profile, it’s the same type of “Kiev-cosmopolitan”, even an urgent period (not across the river, not at the point) took place in Kiev.
        2. +2
          17 November 2017 14: 52
          Your safety is at your feet. Yes
          The New York City Police Department presented an interactive crime map ... Using the map data, residents and visitors can protect themselves from danger, refusing to visit dangerous areas.

        3. +5
          17 November 2017 15: 33
          Lushe map as you have in kuev with security place.
          No, the truth is very interesting ...
          And you are a man from Kiev about Moscow. Anyway, don’t tell me anything worthwhile. Tell me a Muscovite in the 4th generation.
          1. 0
            17 November 2017 15: 43
            BETTER learn to write Russian without errors. I can tell you about criminal Kiev with a quarter-century delay. Now I travel there and on excursions (last time in March 2017). Well and most importantly, I am glad that your personal opinion refutes my, and at the same time state statistics.
            1. +4
              17 November 2017 16: 46
              Learn to write BETTER in Russian no mistakes

              This hohlyatsky joke like that? You mean a tattoo on the body?
              They write either "in Russian" or "in Russian", but not in any way "in Russian."
              Literacy found, a literature teacher ... am
    2. +4
      17 November 2017 16: 08
      You are in New York, or in Los Angeles, or somewhere in San Francisco, for example, move a couple of blocks from the recommended tourist routes, instantly find out what real America is. In terms of "security." Lose your wallet instantly, that's for sure.
  8. 0
    17 November 2017 12: 05
    Quote: BAI
    And what is "variable risk"? Is it safe for someone, someone is not, or is it safe today, tomorrow is not?

    This means in which region of Russia in which clinic you will get.
    For example, based on my sufficiently reliable information, I highly advise against getting into Sklif.
    I can also name enough clinics that you shouldn’t get into.
    I know enough clinics of a very high level.
    And this is Moscow.
    In the regions there are worthy medical facilities, but much less.
    And it’s not for me to tell the Muscovite about the transport accessibility of individual towns of our vast Motherland ..
    These are the variable risks.
    I have a longtime friend Englishman.
    So he, alone with a guide, walked over 250 km. in the mountains and volcanoes of Kamchatka.
    I will never dare to such a thing.
    My risk threshold is much lower.
    1. +2
      17 November 2017 16: 54
      I don’t advise getting into Sklif.

      I do not advise anyone to go to the clinic at all, and the sklif is very good FOR CERTAIN CASES (you just need to understand the specifics of the institution).
      But that’s not the point, can you imagine the current level of healthcare at 404, but what about 404 in Bulgaria? Look at my profile picture in Bulgaria, they just wanted to roll my leg in plaster (I think I would have cut it off in 404)
      Yes, and transport accessibility, for example, in Canada is also not so hot.
      In general, the "" variable "is either something else or just a lie.
  9. Say
    +1
    17 November 2017 12: 11
    There is nothing strange in this leaflet. Whatever they wanted, that was painted. You can release your multi-colored leaflet.
    If there is no tourist infrastructure, then at least nobody will go there to paint green.
  10. +4
    17 November 2017 12: 14
    The organizations that make silly ratings and forecasts have not yet been translated. Now all this resembles Yandex weather, it is impossible to believe something, every 4 hours a completely different forecast. Moreover, the meteorological center, in contrast to the Stalin era with the hut of a meteorologist, where there was only a thermometer, a barometer and a weather vane, now has a satellite constellation, a supercomputer and other modern means. Also with these ratings. It is not known what methods they rely on and what statistics they operate on. Yesterday they just wrote that the average salary in Moscow is 92 thousand rubles. And which Muscovites did not specify. Whether this is true or not is unknown. A certain Valentina Matvienko, for example, believes that the average Russian who receives 32 thousand rubles of salary may well save 60 thousand a month on an apartment. Here is also with these ratings. You will come to the USA, and a nigga will rob you there in the evening. What will you think of the US ranking? Or, in Brussels, Moroccans die off after a football match. Nonsense complete with these ratings and forecasts.
  11. +2
    17 November 2017 12: 21
    Rating as rating. Who ordered and paid, he chose the colors for coloring. First time or what?
    1. +2
      17 November 2017 14: 12
      I agree, a normal rating. You do not forget, a rating according to the degree of danger for the American tourist. Our American tourist risks getting faces in the face just because he is American, and we are clearly not alone in this (judging by the map). And in the ass that they don’t have, they will lick it with a probability of 90%, hence the color on the map.
      1. +4
        17 November 2017 18: 51
        Namely, for mattresses this rating ...
  12. +2
    17 November 2017 13: 14
    In the old days, sometimes the USSR was depicted on maps in red.... And security for foreigners in the USSR was provided much better than in other countries ... laughing

    PS But in general it’s strange that Russia wasn’t painted over with red ... Glimpses of common sense remained, or what? recourse
  13. 0
    17 November 2017 13: 37
    Quote: askort154
    ... the US is all in green. And the fact that people are being shot there like mad dogs, not only on the street, but in schools, at concerts, and even in church.

    Well, what did you want? The hand washes the hand and the raven does not peck out the raven's eye, and it has turned green.
  14. 0
    17 November 2017 14: 23
    Who better than the terrorist to know where they plan the attack.
  15. 0
    17 November 2017 14: 33
    Actually, of course, it’s difficult to judge how they would have provided medical assistance with us if I suddenly turned out to be a tourist. But how can I be rendered to me as a citizen of this country approximately guess and the color is correct.
    1. +1
      17 November 2017 14: 54
      Do not confuse, for "medical tourism" paid another rating card.
  16. +2
    17 November 2017 14: 53
    this card is clearly for madmen. Well, for example, northern Australia and you decided to wash the legs in a small rivulet and there you will find something that does not shoot ... but the map is a solid world. . And of course, Ukraine is a country of continuous tourism, especially in the anti-terrorist operation zone, where, on block 0 in Mayorsk, the so-called the gates to the civilized tseevropu checked by the trotters of the OSCE, painted PU-n - PNH. and you won’t understand how to behave if five rows of cars tearing at the exit and a thorn with mines along the sides without pedestrian paths and dirt, puddles and bustle. and you are waiting for a dozen light soldiers with grenades for a grenade launcher in the form of a bandolier. and other joy Tipo 2 pistols on the hips, knives and machine guns Extreme
  17. +1
    17 November 2017 15: 37
    Quote: zhekazs
    Or maybe the states are better in blue? laughing
    Quote: Partyzan
    Quote: askort154
    Of course, how could it be otherwise, the United States is all in the green.

    not correctly painted - the states should be in white - a white hoodie to them so to face


    .... better at once, blue ...
  18. +1
    17 November 2017 17: 03
    For some reason, the author of the article is offended and upset about a certain “rating” issued by a certain company. In general, I think that it’s not even worth mentioning about such emissions of these young men. And even more upset about this. The folk wisdom says - "they are not offended by fools." One can only sympathize with them.
  19. 0
    17 November 2017 18: 07
    But what should you do if you have twice as many murders per capita? We get acquainted while there is something.
    http://crimestat.ru/world_ranking_homicides
  20. +2
    17 November 2017 19: 00
    Not even surprised. After assigning the highest economic rating to countries with a debt of 200% of GDP, I began to guess that ratings are not at all what we think.
  21. +1
    17 November 2017 21: 17
    Judging by green Europe and the green States, the customer of the rating is immediately understandable. Because getting in your ear in Paris is very simple, and it’s quite easy to be robbed in Barcelona or Naples.
  22. 0
    17 November 2017 23: 23
    I do not understand for. what did Mongolia get so much? laughing
  23. +6
    18 November 2017 02: 22
    You need to publish your rating, at the same time thank the pale-faced people for limited access to their reservations, and recommend that the lucky ones run across barriers in their form in the form of colleges and schools, as well as Baptist churches, well, and the rest that God sends.
  24. 0
    18 November 2017 09: 53
    Quote: faridg7
    Our American tourist risks getting faces in the face just because he is American

    -----------------------------------------------
    If only from stubborn gopniks or if he starts to bully himself. And beat a person for that. that he is an American is not comme il faut. By the way, Americans are very interesting and sincere people. They are simple with their cockroaches. By and large, they do not care after all about the "evil" Russia they broadcast propaganda from each iron.