Presented a list of media that can receive the status of a foreign agent in the Russian Federation

55
The Ministry of Justice of Russia submitted a list of media outlets that, on the basis of amendments to the Law on Mass Media, can be granted the status of a foreign agent. Recall that Russia is implementing a set of responses to the inclusion of the Russia Today TV channel in the list of “foreign agents” by the US Department of Justice.

The list of the Russian Ministry of Justice included such media as Radio Liberty / Free Europe, Voice of America, Crimea. Realia, Azatliq Radiosi, Sibir. Realia, IdeL. Realia, Kavkaz. Realia, TK Present tense, "Factograph" project. The list - 9 of mass media, which operate in Russia on the basis of financing from abroad - primarily deals with the funds allocated by the US Congress for overt anti-Russian activities. Some of the presented media carry out informational activities aimed at the cultivation of separatist sentiments in the Russian Federation.



Presented a list of media that can receive the status of a foreign agent in the Russian Federation


Meanwhile, now the dispute over “how to respond to Russia’s response from her side” has come to the USA. In the circle of US senators, it is stated that Russia has now found a pretext to "get rid of the media that is popular with the opposition." At the same time in Washington, no one discloses the concept of "get rid of." In fact, the status of the media agent, according to representatives of the Russian parliament, does not imply any introduction of bans on the activities of the media. And he assumes a thorough reporting to the supervisory authorities about funding and informing his viewers / listeners / readers that the media works for foreign funds.
55 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +17
    17 November 2017 05: 50
    But isn’t it time to simply ban our work?
    1. +4
      17 November 2017 05: 54
      Quote: 210ox
      But isn’t it time to simply ban our work?

      I agree. The principle should be "ALL FOR ALL." We have this St. ... to x ...., and ours there 1-2.
      So make a mirror answer.
      1. +9
        17 November 2017 06: 00
        Again, they can !!! fool In fact, these are anti-Russian voices that carry out subversive activities against our country, and they need not only to be declared those that they really are, but also to recognize all these stations as terrorist, with all the ensuing consequences! !!!
      2. +20
        17 November 2017 07: 46
        Wouldn’t it be better to develop people's brains so that they can think and distinguish truth from crap? Once banned already and it did not help and even hurt. A person must be able to process information, and for this it should do all.
        1. 0
          17 November 2017 12: 56
          Quote: Hagalaz
          Wouldn’t it be better to develop people's brains so that they can think and distinguish truth from crap? Once banned already and it did not help and even hurt. A person must be able to process information, and for this it should do all.

          Yes, but for those who are not able to handle the TV there.
        2. +1
          17 November 2017 15: 03
          Quote: Hagalaz
          Wouldn’t it be better to develop people's brains so that they can think and distinguish truth from crap?


          AS ??? HOW, with the current Russian media ??? Take at least newspaper magazines, at least a radio, at least a TV .... After all, "slurping" goes through them - even what, only here our government, at point-blank range, does not see this and does not hear ...
          1. 0
            17 November 2017 15: 36
            Quote: weksha50
            AS ??? HOW, with the current Russian media ??? Take at least newspaper magazines, at least a radio, at least a TV .... After all, "slurping" goes through them - even what, only here our government, at point-blank range, does not see this and does not hear ...

            What does the media have to do with it? The ability to think critically and compare, and filter information is laid in childhood! Upbringing! First of all, parents! Then education (with this, we now have huge problems), well, choose the right school for the child, then the right university, where they train not only narrow specialists, but also improve general the level of education. And of course point - parents. Only they can develop abstract thinking in a child.
            Then, as an adult, he will have immunity from any brainwashing!
            And to ban the media, declare the station terrorist, close, plant, expel, build fences and curtains ... THIS:

            What usually ends:

            You can, of course, fence yourself off with a wall, as you have tried, this will delay the last stage, but then it will crash more ...
            It is necessary to work, brothers (s)
            1. 0
              17 November 2017 18: 26
              Quote: AllXVahhaB
              What does the media have to do with it? The ability to think critically and compare, and filter information is laid in childhood! Upbringing! First of all, parents! Then education (with this, we now have huge problems), well, choose the right school for the child, then the right university, where they train not only specialists, but also increase the general level of education. And of course the main thing is the parents. Only they can develop abstract thinking in a child.
              Then, as an adult, he will have immunity from any brainwashing!

              Quote: AllXVahhaB
              It is necessary to work, brothers (s)



              Ahem .... I apologize ... Are you telling me personally or to the whole people ???
              Why, few people now have the opportunities that you have listed in relation to your parents and their possible choice ...

              And in this case, your wishes - I apologize again - a look at the world through pink glasses ... Pink - have nothing to do with LGBT people ... hi
              1. 0
                18 November 2017 02: 27
                Quote: weksha50
                Why, few people now have the opportunities that you have listed in relation to your parents and their possible choice ...

                Well yes, I remember: "We are not such, Life is so" (c) You, therefore, completely cancel personal responsibility? Should someone else bring up your children? What does it have to do with it?
                Quote: weksha50
                And in this case, your wishes - I apologize again - a look at the world through pink glasses ... Pink - have nothing to do with LGBT people ...

                Yes, I understand everything - the mentality is this: either catch a goldfish, or wait for a pike on the stove ...
                Only it's not my pink glasses. I understand perfectly well that no one will do my work for me, and on the blue border (blue - nothing to do with LGBT people ...) no one will bring me anything. I myself create opportunities and raise my children myself. I wander around the country, earning (engineer-surveyor). And he could also sit at home on his ass, scold power, times, the media, world Zionism ... And wait for mercy from the government ...
        3. 0
          17 November 2017 15: 11
          Quote: Hagalaz
          Wouldn’t it be better to develop people's brains so that they can think and distinguish truth from crap?

          Yes, no ... Well, it’s necessary to work, think ... It’s easier to throw an unrealistic moronic call in advance, such as:
          Quote: Herkulesich
          recognize all these stations as terrorist, with all the ensuing consequences! !!!

          And, like, the job is done! Unrealizable stupidity was frozen and as if by a patriot, and nothing needs to be done ...
      3. GRF
        0
        17 November 2017 09: 36
        Quote: Mavrikiy
        Quote: 210ox
        But isn’t it time to simply ban our work?

        I agree. The principle should be "ALL FOR ALL." We have this St. ... to x ...., and ours there 1-2.
        So make a mirror answer.

        Why cheat yourself info? I am sure that "our" noodles you do not impose?
        It is much healthier to receive more information, especially useful, such as a report on media sponsors. And it, in principle, should be reported to the audience by everyone!
      4. 0
        17 November 2017 15: 01
        Quote: Mavrikiy
        I agree. The principle should be "ALL FOR ALL." We have this St. ... to x ...., and ours there 1-2.
        So make a mirror answer.

        There are 1-2 of us there, not because they are forbidden, but because no one is doing this. And And the mirror answer will not ban them from us (this will only show our weakness), but to open as many of ours with them. And not only in English, but also in Spanish, French, German and many others ... Only this is a long and painstaking work! We are used to chopping at random, throwing hats and whatever happens ... But it turns out as always ...
    2. +1
      17 November 2017 07: 09
      Isn't it time to ban being a fool?
      What strange proposals to violate the constitution
      1. jjj
        +1
        17 November 2017 10: 42
        Not much will be on the lists. And the States themselves gave Russia the opportunity to chart media space on the eve of the election
    3. 0
      22 November 2017 22: 38
      then the effect will be stupid when people don’t know how and where they lie / do not agree on Western media and begin to paint for themselves pictures about paradise in the west ..
  2. +3
    17 November 2017 05: 57
    The demons started stirring ... twitching ... finally took them for a sore spot ... we must continue slowly and with sadistic pleasure to turn it 360 degrees around the axis ... let's look at their twitching.
  3. +13
    17 November 2017 05: 58


    Is the list too short? "Echo of Moscow", Novaya Gazeta - pour water on an American mill. Why deprive them of attention? In addition, there is reason to be hysterical ...)))
    1. +1
      17 November 2017 06: 35
      Quote: Litvinov


      Is the list too short? "Echo of Moscow", Novaya Gazeta - pour water on an American mill. Why deprive them of attention? In addition, there is reason to be hysterical ...)))

      And not only deputies of the Duma - 90% of wealthy people of Russia are treated abroad, 70 percent teach children abroad, and every third Russian has relatives outside the Russian Federation))))
      1. +2
        17 November 2017 07: 34
        "And not only the deputies of the Duma ...."
        A very, very sluggish attempt to justify deputies, foreign agents.
        Although ... They are not agents at all, they are enemies of the people. However, like 90% of the wealthy people of Russia ....
        1. 0
          17 November 2017 15: 48
          Quote: I doubt it
          Although ... They are not agents at all, they are enemies of the people. However, like 90% of the wealthy people of Russia ....

          Could you clarify in numbers what “wealthy person” means to you? What is this income per year? And then suddenly I, too, fall under your definition of an enemy of the people ...
          You know: someone has small diamonds, while someone has thin cabbage soup ...
      2. 0
        17 November 2017 15: 45
        Quote: Krasnodar
        And not only deputies of the Duma - 90% of wealthy people of Russia are treated abroad, 70 percent teach children abroad, and every third Russian has relatives outside the Russian Federation))))

        Well, yes ... I was resting in Tunisia in the summer and my relatives live in Houston, and classmates in Germany ... Apparently I am also a foreign agent recourse
        And Peter I, so he, in general, put the production of foreign agents into the stream - how many sent to Europe to study!
        And Lomonosov, what an evil foreign agent !!! Do you remember?
    2. 0
      18 November 2017 19: 20
      I agree. Listen to the Echo and the Voice of America, sometimes just about Russian.
  4. +3
    17 November 2017 05: 59
    It will not be enough. InA Media workers lose their rights for 10 years. Civil service, voting rights, etc.
    1. 0
      17 November 2017 07: 11
      Another thief. Only now, when a negative situation arises against them, they immediately shout: "And we are for what?"
      1. 0
        17 November 2017 15: 57
        Quote: ADmA_RUS
        Another thief. Only now, when a negative situation arises against them, they immediately shout: "And we are for what?"

        Say "for what" or you will find your own?
  5. +8
    17 November 2017 06: 17
    At the same time, nobody in Washington reveals the concept of "getting rid." In fact, the status of a media agent, according to representatives of the Russian parliament, does not imply any prohibitions on the activities of the media.

    We must go to meet Washington and actually get rid ...
  6. +7
    17 November 2017 06: 27
    Create a commission with a guy who is stubborn like McCain, who will filter all their material. Naturally, before going on the air and shoot a frank heresy "as undesirable." And let them work for the good of the motherland. Develop democracy and freedom of speech. And what? I would have shut their filthy mouths long ago.
    Moreover, we need a commission to investigate the interference of mattress workers in our elections. The people also want to know the whole truth.
  7. +1
    17 November 2017 06: 38
    We assume that this is only the beginning and at least some actions will be taken against the Russian media daily discrediting the country and working exclusively in the interests of the West. These media are well-known to everyone, and it’s time for some shaggy one to send to a construction site of n / x with a company of like-minded people.
    1. 0
      17 November 2017 15: 53
      Quote: rotmistr60
      These media are well-known to everyone, and it’s time for some shaggy one to send to a construction site of n / x with a company of like-minded people.

      Why send it somewhere? He does not receive a salary at GazPromMedia? So anyone needs this ...
  8. +3
    17 November 2017 07: 01
    Well, and what is this "mirror response"? In the USA, only "Russia Today", and we have nine in America. It would be “mirror-like” if only one of their “in-agent points” were left in Russia, and the remaining 8 were expelled altogether.
    1. 0
      17 November 2017 15: 56
      Quote: askort154
      Well, and what is this "mirror response"? In the USA, only "Russia Today", and we have nine in America. It would be “mirror-like” if only one of their “in-agent points” were left in Russia, and the remaining 8 were expelled altogether.

      And what, our 8 to open there weakly?
      Or maybe money is a pity? Will not be enough?
      Considering how much our MinKult cries out for all sorts: Leviathans \ Tryapitsins \ Battalions \ Citadels \ Matil
      dy and others like them ... I think no problem ...
  9. +2
    17 November 2017 07: 34
    If even in the USA, Trump recognized SNS as false, then why is it in our honor and not on the list? In general, all their channels should be in it. Since there is nothing good to expect from the mattress pad.
  10. +2
    17 November 2017 08: 07
    Crimea Realities, Caucasus Realities, Siberia Realities - these are the regions of the USA that they want to separate from Russia ...
    I don’t understand why they are still not recognized by foreign agents ?! And why if they conduct obvious anti-Russian activities, the necessary legal measures aimed at bringing them to justice are not applicable to them ?!
    1. 0
      17 November 2017 16: 01
      Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
      Crimea Realities, Caucasus Realities, Siberia Realities - these are the regions of the USA that they want to separate from Russia ...

      I propose to open: Texas Realities, California Realities, Alaska Realities, Hawaii Realities ... I can personally head the last agency good
  11. +2
    17 November 2017 08: 28
    In the current information age, it will not be possible to ban. In Soviet times, they tried to stifle the “voice of America” — still, many listened. The Forbidden fruit is sweet. Information on foreign financing is quite sufficient.
    1. +2
      17 November 2017 09: 17
      Quote: Resident of the Urals
      In Soviet times, they tried to stifle the “voice of America” — still, many listened. the Forbidden fruit is sweet

      There is fun in Russia
      Listen to the BBC at night
      This saying was born in those good old days ... And the same rake, as we see, remains the favorite sporting equipment of our powers that be.
      1. +1
        17 November 2017 09: 38
        No, I would say that mattresses are now stepping on this rake)
      2. jjj
        +2
        17 November 2017 10: 48
        Quote: ranger
        There is fun in Russia
        Listen to the BBC at night

        Usually the value of enemy voices is greatly exaggerated. Their broadcasting style was such that they immediately understood that they were bringing something to you. Later, a phrase began to be pronounced in a similar manner: "Fu, practical"! And everything fell into place
        And it was extremely inconvenient to read the "works" of samizdat because of their overwriting and a dull font. All these products were a "balm" only for those who have not yet begun to be treated in institutions like Kashchenko or Kanadchikova’s dacha.
        1. +1
          17 November 2017 12: 14
          Quote: jjj
          Usually the value of enemy voices is greatly exaggerated.

          The value of hostile voices increases as confidence in domestic sources of information falls. It was no accident that at one time they said: “There is no news in Truth, and there is no truth in Izvestia.” Because someone at the top decides what we should know and what we have not yet grown up to as small children. And for the kids, the fairy tales from Good Night are enough for the kids "... But upstairs, on Olympus, they are all adults and only they can know what is really happening - well, like educators in kindergarten ....
          Only people have grown out of children's pants, do not be mistaken in this regard.
      3. 0
        17 November 2017 16: 04
        Quote: ranger
        This saying was born in those good old days ... And the same rake, as we see, remains the favorite sporting equipment of our powers that be.

        Well, those in power, just, as you can see, they only disclose information about financing. But their favorite equipment, as can be seen from the comments, is not at all with them ...
  12. +2
    17 November 2017 08: 34
    It has long been necessary to do this. Again, as in the situation with sanctions, the American authorities, in pursuit of their domestic political goals, provide services to our pro-government circles of society, forcing our, generally pro-Western authorities, to react symmetrically.
  13. +2
    17 November 2017 08: 42
    Why the status of a foreign agent will receive only some American media, and not all those funded by the US?
    And when will this happen? Or, again, in another stupid “sign of goodwill” they will pull with the execution of this, by the way, decision that has not yet been made?
  14. +1
    17 November 2017 09: 11
    But what about the rain? Or is it like echo matzah Gazprom paid yyyy? What gives or takes this status?
    1. +2
      17 November 2017 09: 26
      "But what about the rain?"
      Probably this channel is under a cap ... A controlling stake (over 51%) in the hands of Gazprom does not mean that the GPs are sub-shareholders, but that the Faberge matzo are in the grip of the holder of a controlling stake and therefore кthe anal is not a big danger for Russia; they can do anything with it, at any moment, with a flick of the wrist.
      1. 0
        17 November 2017 16: 11
        Quote: KondratKo
        A controlling stake (more than 51%) in Gazprom’s hands does not mean that GPs are sub-shareholders, but that Faberge matzo are in the grip of a controlling stake holder and therefore this channel does not pose a great danger to Russia, which can be done with it anything, at any time, with a flick of the wrist.

        Like Echo, these are such sedimentation tanks for the collection of feces. A moderate oppositionist, that is, a person who respects the people and loves the motherland, but who criticizes (in the case) the authorities in general and officials in particular, plunging into the information field of these settlers, emerges as a convinced cheer patriot! For what these information resources are kept, for which they are paid - these are ordinary provocateurs-gapons ...
  15. +1
    17 November 2017 09: 56
    Only these organizations make extra ads. They’re not so big audience listening to them and reading on the Internet. But now there’s a clear increase in those who want to taste the forbidden fruit.
    1. 0
      17 November 2017 16: 14
      Quote: Thunderbolt
      Only these organizations make extra ads. They’re not so big audience listening to them and reading on the Internet. But now there’s a clear increase in those who want to taste the forbidden fruit.

      So what? Well, they’ll come in, revered, maybe they will come in the next day ... And then they will also disappear into the IGORITY ...
  16. The comment was deleted.
    1. 0
      17 November 2017 16: 24
      Quote: geoan
      but I’m thinking that it’s time to introduce the law on CRIMINAL! responsibility for distortion of information about the Russian Federation.

      I have long been convinced that Russia's main problem is not fools and roads, but sincere, zealous! Tell me, dear, and who will determine what information about the Russian Federation is true, and what is the distortion of truth? And most importantly, by what criteria?
      Your four lines are so parallel to reality that at the beginning I thought - you are a minor victim of the exam. Then he looked at your flag and calmed down - you can, you get a discount ...
  17. +2
    17 November 2017 13: 42
    Forgotten "Echo of Moscow", a number of television channels (especially RBC). I have the honor.
    1. 0
      17 November 2017 15: 18
      I hate Ekho Moskvy and therefore don’t listen, but Putin recently said at a meeting with human rights rabble that the “ear” is funded by the state ... Regards ... hi
    2. 0
      17 November 2017 16: 25
      Quote: midshipman
      Forgotten "Echo of Moscow", a number of television channels (especially RBC). I have the honor.

      Comrade Midshipman, why are shoulder straps on land?
  18. +1
    17 November 2017 15: 01
    “The list contains 9 media outlets that operate in Russia on the basis of financing from abroad”...

    I’ll never believe that such media as Rain and Echo (and the like) do not get a penny for their virtually subversive and shaky activities ...
    And I won’t believe that SK-FSB-FSK cannot find any traces of foreign financing ...
    1. +1
      17 November 2017 15: 20
      I support one hundred% hi
    2. 0
      17 November 2017 16: 26
      Quote: weksha50
      I’ll never believe that such media as Rain and Echo (and the like) do not get a penny for their virtually subversive and shaky activities ...
      And I won’t believe that SK-FSB-FSK cannot find any traces of foreign financing ...

      They GazPromMedia normally pays! Why are they lousy penny cents?
  19. 0
    22 November 2017 22: 40
    not waiting for the danger, teachers of all levels must be tackled, and then Western mentors have already taken care of them so successfully that if the boys are in the Bundestag repenting "for ill-treatment of the Nazis" ..