Military Review

Even the US sanctions are not needed: Siluanov and Nabiullina will ruin the Russian economy

76
The policy of the leadership of the Russian Central Bank in the person of Elvira Nabiullina began to cause discontent not only among the expert community, but also among representatives of the domestic business. While the Bank of Russia throws in trillions of rubles to save private credit organizations, enterprises that create real jobs and competitive products are left with nothing.


76 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. solzh
    solzh 16 November 2017 19: 24 New
    +3
    What are the trillions to save private credit organizations? What are you talking about? Again, the conspiracy theory of the world of Judaism does not give rest?
    1. Igar
      16 November 2017 19: 30 New
      +9
      only one “Discovery” was given more than a trillion ...
    2. raid14
      raid14 16 November 2017 19: 37 New
      +7
      List of sanitized banks in Russia
      http://www.bankodrom.ru/spisok-saniruemyh-bankov-
      v-rossii /? d = 1
      According to Fitch, since 2014, 1,14 trillion rubles have been spent on bank rehabilitation, and 1,6 trillion rubles on payments to depositors of banks without licenses. Moreover, according to analysts, the direct losses of the state from bank bankruptcy would be 500 billion rubles. less than what was ultimately spent on reorganization.
      http://www.bankodrom.ru/novosti/163045/
      1. solzh
        solzh 16 November 2017 20: 12 New
        +3
        Reorganization of a problem bank is beneficial for its customers - individuals and legal entities. Individuals are given the opportunity to preserve their savings in full, while in the event of bankruptcy, they can count on no more than 1,4 million rubles. In your opinion, it turns out it is better to bankrupt a bank, it is more profitable to whom? To the state? And do not care about people?
        direct state losses from bank bankruptcy would be 500 billion rubles. less than what was ultimately spent on redevelopment
        1. raid14
          raid14 16 November 2017 21: 40 New
          +4
          Individuals get the opportunity to preserve their savings in full, while in the event of bankruptcy they can count on no more than 1,4 million rubles

          For this, there is deposit insurance, in accordance with the Federal Law "On Insurance of Individuals' Deposits with Banks of the Russian Federation" No. 177-ФЗ dated December 23, 2003.

          To implement the law, the state created a special organization - the Deposit Insurance Agency (DIA), which returns to the depositor the amount of his savings instead of the bank.
          In your opinion, it turns out it is better to bankrupt a bank, it is more profitable to whom? To the state? And do not care about people?

          Reorganization is beneficial to owners and shareholders, (read to bankers), investors (people) will receive their hard-earned money in any situation.
          1. solzh
            solzh 16 November 2017 22: 23 New
            +4
            Bank reorganization is not displayed on the ordinary activities of the bank. In this case, the bank still functions, serves customers, accepts payments and issues deposits. In the event of reorganization, the investor may claim not only his own capital, but also the interest placed on him. DIA will return to the depositor, subject to bankruptcy, the amount not exceeding 1,4 million rubles. you can forget about the interest to the depositor. As for bankers, bankruptcy saves them, but reorganization makes them pay their debts. Something like this. If you are interested, I can describe in more detail the benefits of reorganization from bankruptcy. Yours faithfully hi
            1. Abel
              Abel 21 November 2017 22: 14 New
              0
              Quote: solzh
              As for bankers, bankruptcy saves them, but reorganization makes them pay their debts

              In principle, it is understandable, but the payment of debts at whose expense? Infusions from the budget to save "affiliate banks"?
              1. solzh
                solzh 22 November 2017 21: 31 New
                0
                Sorry, I just saw your question. Debt repayments are made roughly speaking yes, by means of injections from the budget, by issuing securities, at the expense of banks' property, and so on.
            2. would
              would 22 November 2017 12: 00 New
              0
              DIA will return to the depositor, subject to bankruptcy, the amount not exceeding 1,4 million rubles. you can forget about the interest to the depositor.


              Interest can not be forgotten because they are also insured. The main thing is that together with them the amount would not be higher than 1.4 million.

              https://www.asv.org.ru/insurance/faq/

              8,18 item.
              1. solzh
                solzh 22 November 2017 21: 13 New
                0
                Clause 2, Article 11 The amount of compensation for deposits of the Federal Law dated December 23.12.2003, 177 N 29.07.2017-ФЗ (as amended on July 31.07.2017, XNUMX) "On insurance of deposits of individuals with banks of the Russian Federation" (as amended and supplemented, entered into force from XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX) reads:
                Deposit reimbursement at the bank in respect of which the insured event occurs, is paid to the depositor in the amount of 100 percent of the amount of deposits in the bank but no more than 1 rublesunless otherwise provided by this Federal Law.
                About interest is not a word.
                1. would
                  would 23 November 2017 06: 12 New
                  0
                  And you would have looked at my reference, everything is said there.

                  About interest is not a word.


                  You will not believe, but it is said.

                  paid to the depositor in the amount of 100 percent of the deposit amount


                  Because every time a percentage is accrued, it is added to the deposit amount.
                  1. solzh
                    solzh 23 November 2017 13: 29 New
                    0
                    when interest is accrued it is added to the deposit amount

                    Suppose you put 1 rubles for 1000 year. at 6% per annum. In order for interest on the deposit to be added to your deposit, you need to come to the bank and renew the contract for a new term. This is an example of Sberbank, almost any bank charges interest 1 time at the end of the contract. I looked at your link, read it, the Federal Law is indicated there, read them.
                    1. would
                      would 23 November 2017 14: 02 New
                      0
                      In order for interest on the deposit to be added to your deposit, you need to come to the bank and renew the contract for a new term. This is an example of Sberbank, almost any bank charges interest 1 time at the end of the contract.


                      You are mistaken again. The accrual period depends on the contribution. For example, for me interest is accrued monthly, directly on the deposit balance, this is first. Secondly, you don’t need to re-register anything, which you essentially wrote because the interest is accrued for the period specified in the contract, and not only after the execution of a new contract. By the way, you don’t even know that to renew a deposit, you often do not need to renew a contract; there is an automatic renewal.

                      Secondly, as said on the DIA website

                      In accordance with the current legislation, from the moment a license is withdrawn from a bank for banking operations, the deadline for fulfilling its obligations to depositors is considered to have expired (Article 20 of the Federal Law of 02.12.1990 N 395-1 "On Banks and Banking Activities"). Thus, all interest due on the deposit (accrued on the day preceding the day of revocation of the license) is added to the main deposit amount and is included in the calculation of insurance compensation.


                      For example, on 01.07.2006, a depositor placed an amount of 50 rubles in a one-year contribution with quarterly interest payment at a rate of 000% per annum by capitalizing on the main deposit account. Funds were not withdrawn from the account. Then, upon the occurrence of an insured event in connection with the revocation of a license from the bank on 10, the bank's obligations included in the calculation of insurance compensation will amount to 02.11.2006 rubles, including: 51 rubles. - by the main amount of the deposit; $ 695,64 - at accrued interest for the full quarter; $ 50 - for interest for an incomplete quarter on the day preceding the day of revocation of the license.


                      And here is the very Federal Law that you recommended to read, but you yourself did not read

                      From the moment a credit organization revokes a banking license:
                      1) the deadline for fulfilling the obligations of a credit institution that arose prior to the day of revocation of a banking licenseunless otherwise provided by federal law. At the same time, the amount of monetary obligations and obligations to pay the obligatory payments of a credit institution denominated in foreign currency is determined in rubles at the exchange rate established by the Bank of Russia on the day the credit institution revoked the banking license or on the day specified by the Federal Law, or in the established them okay;


                      Article 20, Federal Law "On Banks and Banking"

                      That is, even if the agreement specifies the frequency of accrual per year, then after the license is withdrawn, even before the expiration of the year from the moment of deposit, interest on the past term is still required to accrue and pay.

                      So I recommend that before you discuss the accumulative contributions to begin with, at least in general terms, find out what it is and how it works. Because now you’ve made a mistake in the basics several times in a row. You do not even know what is the frequency of interest accrual and that it is different, what can be discussed here then?
                      1. would
                        would 23 November 2017 14: 17 New
                        0
                        That is, even if the agreement specifies the frequency of accrual per year, then after the license is withdrawn, even before the expiration of the year from the moment of deposit, interest on the past term is still required to accrue and pay.


                        Of course, not more than 1.4 million rubles with respect to the entire amount.
                    2. would
                      would 23 November 2017 14: 15 New
                      0
                      Speaking of

                      This is an example of Sberbank, almost any bank charges interest 1 time at the end of the contract.


                      An example of Sberbank? Good. Let's check how this is an example of Sberbank. We take and read the terms of the "Manage" deposit

                      "Interest is accrued monthly."

                      "The interest accrued is added to the deposit amount, increasing income in the following periods."

                      Renew the contract?

                      Extension Terms
                      Automatic prolongation is carried out on the terms and at the interest rate, valid for the deposit "Replenish OnL @ yn" on the date of prolongation.

                      The number of extensions is not limited.


                      So before you give something as an example, it would be worth it to study something and find out that there are more than one kind of contributions. And if one percent is accrued at the end of the contract, then the other monthly.
              2. solzh
                solzh 22 November 2017 21: 34 New
                0
                By the way, the rehabilitation is carried out according to a new scheme - through the recently created Fund for the Consolidation of the Banking Sector (FCS), controlled by the Central Bank. Thus, the Bank of Russia itself acts as a sanatorium. Through such a scheme, Otkritie Bank is sanitized without the involvement of the DIA.
            3. Sling cutter
              Sling cutter 22 November 2017 19: 56 New
              +1
              Quote: solzh
              Bank reorganization is not displayed on the ordinary activities of the bank.

              I will explain to you more clearly! Money has already been stolen, and the Central Bank is pouring budget money into the bank, that is, ours.
              So see?
          2. Alber
            Alber 18 November 2017 20: 04 New
            +2
            Quote: raid14
            Individuals get the opportunity to preserve their savings in full, while in the event of bankruptcy they can count on no more than 1,4 million rubles

            For this, there is deposit insurance, in accordance with the Federal Law "On Insurance of Individuals' Deposits with Banks of the Russian Federation" No. 177-ФЗ dated December 23, 2003.

            To implement the law, the state created a special organization - the Deposit Insurance Agency (DIA), which returns to the depositor the amount of his savings instead of the bank.
            In your opinion, it turns out it is better to bankrupt a bank, it is more profitable to whom? To the state? And do not care about people?

            Reorganization is beneficial to owners and shareholders, (read to bankers), investors (people) will receive their hard-earned money in any situation.

            Quote: solzh
            Bank reorganization is not displayed on the ordinary activities of the bank. In this case, the bank still functions, serves customers, accepts payments and issues deposits. In the event of reorganization, the investor may claim not only his own capital, but also the interest placed on him. DIA will return to the depositor, subject to bankruptcy, the amount not exceeding 1,4 million rubles. you can forget about the interest to the depositor. As for bankers, bankruptcy saves them, but reorganization makes them pay their debts. Something like this. If you are interested, I can describe in more detail the benefits of reorganization from bankruptcy. Yours faithfully hi

            Whatever you call it, reorganization, profanity, all these schemes, all these derivatives, futures, bills and loans were invented by usury in order to fool ordinary people. And for any government, excuse me for being rude, obie ... enrich the people, do not even doubt it. There are practically no factories, the collective farms are also almost all liquidated, and what to fill the treasury with? So they will rob people with new and old taxes and strangle with noises
            1. Abel
              Abel 21 November 2017 22: 15 New
              0
              So it turns out that the banks turned into usurious offices.
        2. Gardamir
          Gardamir 17 November 2017 09: 45 New
          +3
          Reorganization of a problem bank is beneficial to its customers
          When will the reorganization of the economy begin? And then what kind of duplicity? You said above that this is a conspiracy, now on the contrary, what is the use, where is the truth?
          1. solzh
            solzh 17 November 2017 10: 21 New
            +1
            What duplicity? I asked a question about the conspiracy but I did not say that it was a conspiracy. Remediation is beneficial to customers. So there is no duplicity. You better tell me specifically what you want to tell me?
            1. Gardamir
              Gardamir 17 November 2017 10: 30 New
              +1
              want to tell me?
              It’s just that there are people and there is power, all these Chubais, Shuvalovs, and, above, those interested in filling their pockets are more than caring for the country they are in charge of, and the Jewish Masonic conspiracy has nothing to do with it.
        3. Abel
          Abel 21 November 2017 22: 12 New
          0
          And where is the advertised financial control system?
        4. nickname7
          nickname7 22 November 2017 09: 45 New
          0
          The bank, in theory, needs to be saved in order to prevent the loss of depositors, BUT there is one thing, but where did the bank’s money go? Incompetent, irresponsible or thieves leadership? If the thief is given money, he will steal again. If the money in the bank has disappeared, the first is to remove the leadership, to investigate, if a thief, then prison and confiscation, if incompetence, then a ban on taking office. appoint a new leadership, and only then give money.
    3. Abel
      Abel 21 November 2017 22: 10 New
      0
      Otkritie Bank is a private bank. How much pumped money into it. Who provided the bank with personal information of citizens for the distribution of unfair advertising and fraud?
  2. Fedya2017
    Fedya2017 16 November 2017 21: 44 New
    +7
    Yeah ... The culprits were again mentioned for the 100500th time, but not a word about the “tsar-hope” himself.
    1. Gardamir
      Gardamir 17 November 2017 10: 06 New
      +5
      not a word.
      You can not offend him. So against him is the fifth column, Americans, Ukrainians. She is very tired, she only has enough strength to support the banks, and to give the Rottenberg orders for receiving money.
      1. Fedya2017
        Fedya2017 17 November 2017 19: 03 New
        +1
        Quote: Gardamir
        Very tired

        Well, he claims to be doing more than Stalin and other Soviet leaders combined ... https://yandex.ru/video/search?filmId=56391197335
        66726922&text=%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE%
        20%D0%BF%D1%83%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BD%20%D1%83%D1%82%D
        0%B2%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B6%D0%B4%D0%B0%D0%B5%D1%82%20
        %D1%87%D1%82%D0%BE%20%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%
        82%D0%B0%D0%B5%D1%82%20%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D
        1%88%D0%B5%20%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%81
        %D0%BA%D0%B8%D1%85%20%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B6%D0%B4%D0%
        B5% D0% B9 & noreask = 1 & path = wizard & reqid =
        1501012745453807-721574315848603262804525-man1-35
        30-V
      2. Alexander Borisov
        Alexander Borisov 18 November 2017 13: 13 New
        +1
        And what, you wanted to receive an order for the construction of the Kerch bridge, and Rothenberg crossed the road for you? As far as I know, the task of building the Kerch Bridge is very difficult and there were no people who really wanted to build it, but don’t saw the money, except Rotenberg, Timchenko first proposed this project, but said he wouldn’t.
  3. unignm
    unignm 16 November 2017 22: 02 New
    +2
    they want money but give it to the wrong ones? Well Duc ....
  4. Eurodav
    Eurodav 16 November 2017 22: 44 New
    +2
    Quote: solzh
    What are the trillions to save private credit organizations? What are you talking about? Again, the conspiracy theory of the world of Judaism does not give rest?

    Is she not there? Prove or shut up! No offense, huh?
    1. solzh
      solzh 16 November 2017 23: 45 New
      +4
      Is she not there?

      Are you talking about freemasonry? If so, then no. All the hysteria around the world conspiracy is designed for people not quite smart.
      Prove or shut up!
      I’m not going to prove it, I don’t need it, but to prove to others - let others prove it. I can’t shut up, or rather I can when I die, but it will not be soon.
      No offense, huh?

      What insults in our time. On the offended ... For lived, were always ready, honest pioneer.))))) Regards (for some reason, emoticons are not inserted)
      1. Shurale
        Shurale 17 November 2017 07: 04 New
        +4
        The usual troll ... There is an opinion, there is no evidence and it is not going to provide them ... Do not respect yourself with such a conversation.
        1. solzh
          solzh 17 November 2017 09: 05 New
          +2
          Not respecting yourself is answering the gross questions of a person who considers himself smarter than others, who wants to humiliate another person. So do not be clever.
          Your quote: "Conversation with such do not respect yourself." I see you respect yourself very much.
  5. Eurodav
    Eurodav 16 November 2017 22: 46 New
    0
    Quote: Fedya2017
    Yeah ... The culprits were again mentioned for the 100500th time, but not a word about the “tsar-hope” himself.

    Who is the king-father for you? Or are you not Fedya 2017?
  6. Eurodav
    Eurodav 16 November 2017 22: 50 New
    0
    Do not whine! We are great! So modest ...
  7. Eurodav
    Eurodav 16 November 2017 23: 51 New
    +2
    Quote: solzh
    What are the trillions to save private credit organizations? What are you talking about? Again, the conspiracy theory of the world of Judaism does not give rest?

    Does not give! Refute? Or do you snake in the bushes?
    1. solzh
      solzh 16 November 2017 23: 59 New
      +1
      See the answer above. I can and in the bushes, and snake, and dog, and other animal poses, too, I can anyone and anywhere)))
  8. Eurodav
    Eurodav 16 November 2017 23: 53 New
    +3
    Quote: solzh
    Is she not there?

    Are you talking about freemasonry? If so, then no. All the hysteria around the world conspiracy is designed for people not quite smart.
    Prove or shut up!
    I’m not going to prove it, I don’t need it, but to prove to others - let others prove it. I can’t shut up, or rather I can when I die, but it will not be soon.
    No offense, huh?

    What insults in our time. On the offended ... For lived, were always ready, honest pioneer.))))) Regards (for some reason, emoticons are not inserted)

    “I’m not going to prove it, I don’t need it, but to prove it to others - let others prove it.” - but what is the meaning of your talk?
    1. solzh
      solzh 17 November 2017 00: 02 New
      +2
      and the meaning of your chatter?

      And the meaning of human existence?
      1. Shurale
        Shurale 17 November 2017 07: 06 New
        +4
        A vivid example of the troll’s actions, switching to another topic if it was proved to him that he can’t provide anything except trolling on the topic under discussion ...
        1. solzh
          solzh 17 November 2017 08: 53 New
          +1
          And what topic was in the article, do not tell me, otherwise I forgot. If you want to talk about Judaism, create an article, talk, discuss, at the expense of the troll, but no, I am not a troll, but just an elf. And by the way, the entire branch should be read comments, not part. And my answers were to his rudeness the rudeness of the Eurodava
          1. Gardamir
            Gardamir 17 November 2017 10: 10 New
            +1
            about freemasonry
            you started a conversation. in the article, it is said, they help the banks and they don’t give a damn about the people. You reduced it to a conversation about the Jewish masons, you came up with it yourself, you made fun of it.
            1. solzh
              solzh 17 November 2017 10: 17 New
              +1
              A little bit wrong, I ridiculed trillions of rubles and asked about Judaism, the conversation itself went about banks, then there was rudeness on the part of the Eurodav, then the shurale blamed me for trolling. That's all
  9. mavrus
    mavrus 17 November 2017 01: 13 New
    +4
    I didn’t even watch the video, I’ll definitely watch tomorrow. It's too late today.
    But finally they called the main pests. It can also be explained when these bureaucrats launched an attack on the weakening of the ruble with the help of all kinds of "ingenious economists" from the beginning of the year ...
    Four months, they spent state funds rubbing in the media that tomorrow the ruble would definitely fall, and he continued to strengthen ... It’s clear ... they don’t know how to work, and they’re doing some sort of business, and the Russians are paying for it. Here, at least the treasury was not very pleased. But now? The ruble went down, and let them screech to the whole world, which increases the purchase of currency many times over, the ruble falls more, and they continue to buy ...
    And most importantly, they promise to buy daily in increased volumes, right up to December 6, currency at an inflated price. This is not a squandering of state funds.
    What, the mind was not enough to buy earlier? I admit that was not enough. But why the squeal that we will continue to buy up and "for the price we will not stand?" How can I explain this? Besides the fact that they’re scrolling through their dark affairs, or they are fulfilling someone’s order (and everyone guesses whose one) there are no other versions and cannot be.
  10. Bosch
    Bosch 17 November 2017 06: 04 New
    +6
    If the passengers mentioned above are sitting in their seats, then someone needs this.
  11. XII Legion
    XII Legion 17 November 2017 10: 51 New
    16
    Russian economy will be ruined by Siluanov and Nabiullina

    Did they come from the airless space or did someone appoint and support them?
    Everything is done according to the script.
    Nothing personal and nothing more.
  12. Severok
    Severok 17 November 2017 11: 16 New
    +3
    The entire economic bloc of the government, together with the Central Bank and its leadership, has long deserved the confiscation of property, including their relatives, along with deportation to places distant 100 km from the regional, paradise and republican centers with a population of no more than 100 people, ensuring their minimum pension and pay. It is also worth adding State Duma, Obldudsky, Republican and Sovetoped .. Council of Federations. Absolutely worthless creatures for the people and the country.
  13. cedar
    cedar 17 November 2017 14: 24 New
    +6
    According to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the Central Bank is not subordinate to the government, court, lawmakers, i.e. authorities. Again. The Central Bank stands above all the authorities. The Government of the Russian Federation, the Prosecutor's Office and the Constitutional Court did not have a decree for him.
    His decree is the US Federal Reserve, where the Central Bank of the Russian Federation pushes and accumulates gold reserves and where it regularly buys bonds, thereby supporting the economy, and therefore the military-industrial complex and the US Armed Forces, which have been hammering us with sanctions for three years, i.e. are waging an economic war.
  14. The comment was deleted.
  15. kot28.ru
    kot28.ru 17 November 2017 15: 20 New
    +4
    It's time to return the article for sodomy and sweep their relatives with a broom from state agencies!
  16. Sotskiy
    Sotskiy 17 November 2017 19: 45 New
    +1
    Again about the "fish"?
    "Carcass" rotted, and the "head" blooms and smells?))
    What was the banking system created for, for the development of economic activity of business and increase in consumer demand, by the method of lending and, as a result, the development of the economy? Where did the activity of industrial production and consumer demand go?) What? No industry? Where did it go? Go bankrupt? Damn it! What? Nothing to fill the budget with? So put money at 0,25% in US bonds. Little? (How is it, by the way, loans for your own business and the population are also available at 0,25%?). New taxes can be introduced, ("people" shavat) on the disposal of shoes, toilet paper, etc., excise tax on fuel on 10% raise (you can come up with another "transport" tax), squeeze out the rest of the remaining tolls for tolls and parking lots, cancel the tax deductions, "optimize" healthcare and education ... What again is LITTLE "squeezed out" ?!
    Guys, can it be easier to exchange YOU together with your “effective economic policy” for the General Secretary and the planned economy, well, until you have killed and plundered everything?
    1. Abel
      Abel 21 November 2017 22: 22 New
      0
      You still forgot about raising the excise tax on tobacco. They care about the health of the nation so that the excise tax is higher than the cost
  17. chief.matros
    chief.matros 17 November 2017 20: 06 New
    +5
    I know about several factories in the city of Krasnodar, and not only that, during the Soviet era, they produced products bought up by the West, and the main orders were from the USA, Canada, Italy, Spain, other European countries, they began to revive at the beginning of 2000- x, but at the moment they have become bankrupt due to underfunding, and competition (before the imposition of sanctions), this is the policy of the Central Bank. If a Western corporation opens its branch in Russia, there are no obstacles to lending to it, if a domestic one is horseradish with butter. Conclusion: even though you reap, and even though you-you-you still get-x @ th.
  18. Sergey53
    Sergey53 17 November 2017 20: 39 New
    +2
    Why banks are allocated money, although they do not finance industry but are engaged in speculation with their own currency. And enterprises do not allocate money, although they really earn money. What kind of economy does Mr. Siluanov, Nabiullina and Mr. Medvedev build? And the fact that they did not give it to the banks is invested in American securities. And our budget is executed with underfunding.
  19. Slavors Gart
    Slavors Gart 17 November 2017 21: 00 New
    +2
    That would be so many enterprises opened - like banks ......., every 100 meters - there is a bank ..... jewelry ... bank ......, and all these banks really only profit on the population, taking loans abroad at the lowest interest rates, and vparivaya the population at high rates ......, to take monjo only to “drug dealers” at such interest rates in our banks .. and that’s just very cool.
  20. Elena Khazova
    Elena Khazova 18 November 2017 11: 03 New
    +3
    VO, when will you finish hitting the economic bloc by publishing materials of the monarchist tsar-grad? Or are you also monarchists who want to overthrow the legally elected President? Do you work for Masha? To the elections - well, it’s necessary right ...
    I’ll tell you frankly - I’m not even looking for a video of these goods. BASICALLY.
    Nabiullina works for Russia, and works well. Dot.

    LEN
    1. badens1111
      badens1111 18 November 2017 11: 21 New
      +3
      Quote: Elena Khazova
      I’ll tell you frankly - I’m not even looking for a video of these goods. BASICALLY.
      Nabiullina works for Russia, and works well.

      Now, look and do not tell anyone else that she. Gref and Kudrin with Silanova work well.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6d1_GvYWSvs
      Disgusting work.
      Everything rests on the loot.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cosx5Mb3Gc
    2. Aleksandr_5
      Aleksandr_5 20 November 2017 13: 19 New
      0
      "Nabiullina works for Russia, and works well. Point." - Bullshit! No.
  21. Alexander Borisov
    Alexander Borisov 18 November 2017 13: 36 New
    0
    The fact is that bankruptcy of banks can lead to bankruptcy of the real sector of the economy, which is serviced by this bank and saving systemically important banks. The Central Bank rescues enterprises engaged in industrial and agricultural production, services in high-tech fields, small business, etc. that the Central Bank allowed such a state of affairs in these banks. This suggests that the Central Bank of the Russian Federation unsatisfactorily fulfills its obligations to control the banking system of the Russian Federation and the leadership of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation should answer for this.
    1. Semyonych
      Semyonych 23 November 2017 13: 30 New
      0
      My dream is that the bank where I took a commercial loan at 25% per annum went somewhere and forgot about my existence. Our banks, this type of "blood clots" in the blood vessels, clogged everything. Money, like blood, should go freely.
  22. 89536931581
    89536931581 18 November 2017 17: 00 New
    +1
    Thank Putin for such specialists. Can they fire them or influence their decisions and the policy of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation - see the Constitution of the Russian Federation and the Federal Law on the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, how the governing body is formed and how the president can influence all the Government (to resign), the Duma ( dissolve if she rejects the candidatures of new prime ministers three times) - whose representatives are included in the governing body of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation. Putin has Primavkov’s experience in pulling the Russian Federation out of the economic crisis - reducing 1) the Central Bank’s rates, 2) monopoly tariffs (they are overpriced because they include huge revenues from their leadership, overpricing, for example, the Antimonopoly Service it requires Gazprom to stop buying pipes through intermediaries, which is more expensive, and buy directly from factories, which is cheaper) to buy pipes, 3) control of currency flows from exporters, 4) progressive personal income tax for replenishing the budget mainly at the expense of those who can afford foreign real estate, and not at the expense of the main part of the low-income population with fees like resort. These measures made it possible to overcome the crisis after the default of August 1998, when oil was cheaper than now, there was no Reserve and Stable funds. But Putin stubbornly slows down with the use of measures that have shown their effect. Putin himself took a major step to drown the economy of the Russian Federation - he brought the Russian Federation to the WTO despite the protests of farmers and machine builders. As a result, they lost some government support measures prohibited by WTO rules. BUT, entry into the WTO did not save either the country from sanctions, or exporters of metallurgical and chemical products from anti-dumping measures. Well, the furniture maker Serdyukov at the head of the Ministry of Defense, and now at the head of the Rostec air defense division (defense order and a lot of money), this is Putin’s undermining of the RF’s defense capability. After all, Putin could forbid Medvedev to appoint Serdyukov as a min-rum and may put pressure on Chemezov to fire Serdyukov.
    1. Gleb Zheglov
      Gleb Zheglov 19 November 2017 09: 26 New
      0
      Jump on. Maybe everything will work out. Around a bonfire, for example
      1. 89536931581
        89536931581 20 November 2017 14: 33 New
        0
        in fact, you have not refuted a single thesis, not a single logical argument to refute my point of view and to support your own. sculpt some kindergarten teasers instead.
    2. Macross
      Macross 20 November 2017 12: 02 New
      0
      We need the WTO, since it solved problems with electronics, and not with something else. And the fact that the WTO has its own rules does not mean that they did not act, like other countries. Only the WTO has been analyzing all possible claims for years, as Putin stressed. Rostec was organized to track and stabilize industrial groups. Serdyukov, like Chubais, is a separate issue, since it is not clear for what merits they have not yet been sent to the comfort zone.
      Control over the flow of currency was assigned to Nabiullina, and Siluanova was given to help her. And the first thing they did was to begin testing the liquidity of a bloated banking sector.
      1. 89536931581
        89536931581 20 November 2017 14: 30 New
        0
        To solve the problem with electronics, you need to invest in your science and production and create conditions for development — reduction of red tape, the absence of amateurs and mediocre appointees from top positions — and not in the USA and the 2018 World Cup, which will not pay off, taking into account the huge costs of its preparation.
        1. Semyonych
          Semyonych 23 November 2017 14: 51 New
          0
          And you do not know? They have already invested in electronics. In the year 18, everyone, even grandmother with seeds, must have a new cash desk, with the ability to send checks (for a fee) through space somewhere. Approximately 40000000 new CCPs.
          1. would
            would 23 November 2017 15: 13 New
            0
            But these ticket offices are far from their own and invested more in foreign manufacturers and outbid, but not in domestic electronics and science.
  23. Tair
    Tair 18 November 2017 18: 47 New
    0
    This means that small private credit enterprises are not large domestic businessmen - their point of view is strange.
  24. Gleb Zheglov
    Gleb Zheglov 19 November 2017 09: 24 New
    +1
    All mixed up, began to hysteria, like banderlogs. The song is old and stupid. The Central Bank in principle does not create jobs. Money goes to banks and the economy. For the Central Bank, the stability of the banking system without bankruptcy of the largest banks is important. For the whole economy also
  25. The comment was deleted.
  26. Macross
    Macross 20 November 2017 11: 39 New
    0
    The banking system has long begun to recover. The question is that they kept more money than necessary in banks. What for eggs put in one basket? And so it was clear that there were more banks in Russia than Western banks combined. And most banks played against the ruble. Even if we take banks, they were created at the expense of foreign capital, which was taken abroad. Raising bets gave dubious customers or transferred huge amounts abroad.
    I do not understand what it is about? Since they say one thing in reality, the work of banks, we see another, which are engaged in this and that they transfer a large amount of money abroad. And lending to the real sector is already kind of affordable, the interest rate is reduced.
  27. Sergey Kiryushin
    Sergey Kiryushin 20 November 2017 17: 20 New
    0
    Hmm, not a simple topic. The fact that the banking system is being cleaned today makes most businessmen think that working in the white can be profitable. The only question is, in what way is beneficial? The benefit of preserving your freedom and part of the money is one benefit. The benefit of making more profit is another benefit. While everything goes to the benefit of the first. But I would like to - to the second. But our government always turned out to be wonderful to ban, but never managed to competently control. After all, why can not you lend to the real sector of the economy at a lower interest rate? Yes, because it will be necessary to monitor the spending of these funds. It means working more. It’s much easier to “raise” a bet and let only those who survive can survive. And this is with a deficit of external borrowing due to sanctions. I agree with those who offer "free hands" for the development of small and medium-sized businesses, and not try my best to milk and tax already available! Yes, the budget will not be sweet. Perhaps this will slow down rearmament, space and something else there. But this slowdown will be a temporary and possible economic surge, which will make it possible to play it back, and subsequently accelerate it, because economic development will lead to increased investment in science. But we prefer with caution, carefully, "God forbid it does not work out" and there are no people who are ready to answer for this. For now is not Yeltsin’s time and they may ask.
  28. Penzyac
    Penzyac 20 November 2017 18: 47 New
    0
    Quote: unignm
    they want money but give it to the wrong ones? Well Duc ....

    In any case, a bank whose lending is not the main source of income (in fact) is not a bank, but some kind of "Horns and Hooves" office (most likely, it’s kind of a casino) ...
  29. Forever so
    Forever so 22 November 2017 12: 26 New
    0
    Well, after all, the prime lawyer said many years ago - The main thing in the economy of the BANK. Everything else is secondary. so the course on keeping Russia as a market for the migrant community is maintained stably. Well, who saw the enterprise market ?? only BANKS. so that the right way we are led by Medvedev and Putin, to the very anus of the migratory community, to repent and pray.
  30. perets
    perets 22 November 2017 14: 12 New
    0
    How it all started ... only we can have such a madhouse !!!soldier
  31. Meshchersky
    Meshchersky 22 November 2017 19: 40 New
    +1
    I would like to speak about the economic block of the Russian government, but such words are forbidden in the HE ... but they are not worthy of others.
  32. yana406
    yana406 23 November 2017 10: 56 New
    0
    no way to watch the video, describe the situation