Military Review

Zyuganov: I am ashamed of Russia because of the "Madame from" House-2 ""

150
The leader of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation Gennady Zyuganov said that he was ashamed of the country after the statements of one of the presidential candidates, reports RIA News.




One Madame from "House-2" as a "candidate for the call" begins to carry nonsense, I feel ashamed for the country,
said the Communist leader at a press conference.

According to Zyuganov, the decision on his participation in the presidential race "will be taken at the December congress of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation by the entire party team."

He stressed that the elections should go with the "specific program and team" that the Communists have.

Recall the plans to participate in the presidential election, said the former TV host of the project "House-2" Ksenia Sobchak.

According to the agency, “Liberal Democratic Party leader Vladimir Zhirinovsky, journalist Yekaterina Gordon, head of the Avanti business patriotism association for business patriotism Rakhman Yansukov and leader of the Women's Dialog party Elena Semerikova also intend to nominate their candidacies.

The Yabloko party plans to put Grigory Yavlinsky to the polls. Political scientists Andrei Bogdanov, one of the founders of the Nashi movement Boris Yakemenko, and the leader of the Revival movement Alexander Chukhlebov also announced their plans to run.

The election campaign should start in December, the elections themselves are scheduled for March 2018.
Photos used:
Gennady zyuganov
150 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Ami du peuple
    Ami du peuple 16 November 2017 09: 58 New
    41
    And I am ashamed of Zyuganov. The revisionist and compromiser who exchanged communist beliefs for buns from the government. In 1996, he had a chance, but the "eternal oppositionist" had missed this chance ... in general.
    So now Ksyushad is the most worthy opponent for him, and I won’t be surprised if she collects more votes than “daddy Zyu”.
    1. The black
      The black 16 November 2017 10: 01 New
      14
      ... yes, leave you already aunt horse alone. wassat..hotyaayayaya ... this is an amoeba whose environment appropriates banal horseism. FOR HORSE SATISFIED cutest animals! smile
      1. cniza
        cniza 16 November 2017 10: 37 New
        +8
        That's it, forget and score, and then they themselves are promoting it in full.
        1. Piramidon
          Piramidon 16 November 2017 11: 07 New
          +8
          Quote: cniza
          That's it, forget and score, and then they themselves are promoting it in full.

          And who is her PR, except for herself and the fans of House-2? By the way. Ksyushad already considered her PR campaign successful and refused to nominate her candidacy. Well, some have forgotten that such a horse exists, you need to be remindedap
          1. NIKNN
            NIKNN 16 November 2017 12: 00 New
            +8
            Quote: Piramidon
            ap

            - Holmes, why do you think Ksenia Sobchak nominated herself as a presidential candidate?
            “That's elementary, Watson.” She considers herself already savvy enough for this.
        2. Vanek
          Vanek 16 November 2017 11: 46 New
          +2
          Quote: cniza
          Score


          - To her land! , And then kicked!*

          hi

          I imagine it that way ...
    2. 79807420129
      79807420129 16 November 2017 10: 08 New
      18
      According to the agency, “LDPR leader Vladimir Zhirinovsky, journalist Yekaterina Gordon, head of the Avanti business patriotism entrepreneurship development association, Rakhman Yansukov, and the leader of the Women's Dialogue party, Elena Semerikova, also intend to stand for election. The Yabloko party plans to run for election of Grigory Yavlinsky. Political analyst Andrei Bogdanov, one of the founders of the Nashi movement Boris Yakemenko and leader of the Vozrozhdenie movement, Alexander Chukhlebov, also announced plans to run for office.

      The company is just super good You don’t know whether from a wild rzhach under the table to fall down or blush with shame. And it’s time for Zyugu to spout beds in the country. yes
      1. The black
        The black 16 November 2017 10: 12 New
        +5
        Quote: 79807420129
        The company is just super

        So this is one of the goals of all these schutchevs, Gordons and Chukhlebovs - to turn the elections into a laughing stock and a show ....
      2. Rey_ka
        Rey_ka 16 November 2017 10: 12 New
        12
        Now our choices are turning into shows! Elections among the exhibits of the Kunstkamera!
      3. badens1111
        badens1111 16 November 2017 10: 16 New
        +5
        Quote: 79807420129
        The company is just super

        Zyuganov will not go to the polls. Nominated either by Melnikov or Afonin.
        But here the nomination of clowns, Polonsky, dogs and so on, that's for sure, the circus.
        1. Piramidon
          Piramidon 16 November 2017 15: 19 New
          +1
          Quote: badens1111
          Nominated either Melnikov or Afonin.

          Does anyone except you know them? It seems to me that Ksyusha is better known.
          1. badens1111
            badens1111 16 November 2017 16: 53 New
            +2
            Quote: Piramidon
            Does anyone else know them?

            Well, if you are special in Ksyusha, then vote for these clowns, though then do not be offended if, instead of the country, there will no longer be a circus, but a bloody big top.
      4. Sars
        Sars 16 November 2017 10: 49 New
        +4
        There Anfisa with large formations signed up.
        The theater picked up a very promising one - after the elections, you can perform tours all over the country, Petrosyan has a rest.
      5. Angel_and_Demon
        Angel_and_Demon 16 November 2017 11: 22 New
        +6
        I'm Out Of Business

        The face opened - I became his face,
        And he told me lightly and sadly:
        “There are no prophets in his own country, -
        But in other fatherlands - not a lot. ”
        it's funny - if it weren’t so sad hi
      6. turbris
        turbris 16 November 2017 11: 58 New
        +3
        That's really embarrassing! Who turns an election into a bluff? First of all, not passing “eternal” presidential candidates - Zyuganov, Zhirinovsky, Yavlinsky, etc. And where are the youth in these parties, on which, as they claim, they rely on? The Communist Party in its role, with Zyuganov there will only say goodbye to the cemetery, and the LDPR remains the party of one person, it is strange that there are people who vote for them.
    3. badens1111
      badens1111 16 November 2017 10: 08 New
      +8
      Quote: Ami du peuple
      And I am ashamed of Zyuganov. Revisionist and Compromiser

      Well, as long as you, the “crayfish” and the pike “left” pull each blanket on themselves or the notorious cart in different directions, then obviously you are not a damn thing, not capable of anything. Not nice, but actually like that.
      And besides, quasi-power ones, such as the “communists of Russia," all sorts of similar ones, upon closer examination, are a draft of the government. Ups, what do you suggest next?
      Continue to blow into the tune. In the likeness of Zhirinovsky, the same for the poor, Russians, Martians and Venusians, anyway pennies paid.
    4. dauria
      dauria 16 November 2017 10: 11 New
      16
      And I am ashamed of Zyuganov.


      And I for the members of the CPSU, Putin, Shoigu, Matvienko, Medvedev, Sobyanin, Gryzlov .... There are many of them in the government. Among the oligarchs, too.
      After all, the Communists swore by something, didn’t they? wink And then someone dreams back to socialism. What for ? Build industry and privatize again? wassat

      Yes, Zyuganov is also sick. He is an “Ihnen” communist. Just such a role.
      1. turbris
        turbris 16 November 2017 12: 03 New
        +9
        But about the members of the CPSU - you are in vain, you still didn’t have enough labels to hang on; among the members of the CPSU there were a lot of decent and honest people who believed in socialism and communism and there was no need to offend them. They are not to blame for the fact that traitors were wound up in the Politburo and the Central Committee of the CPSU.
        1. Esoteric
          Esoteric 16 November 2017 13: 11 New
          +2
          Quote: turbris
          They are not to blame for the fact that traitors were wound up in the Politburo and the Central Committee of the CPSU.

          Let's not ... But what about the principles of democratic centralism? Or did they appear "suddenly out of nowhere" in the Central Committee of the CPSU?
          Do you continue to believe in communism? Or should this utopian trend be inserted into the name of the party at all costs? Socialism is real and tangible, capitalism is and will be everything that his hand touches ... what What kind of system is communism? Is he real? Maybe enough to wait for him and call him the grave digger of capitalism? recourse
          1. turbris
            turbris 16 November 2017 17: 43 New
            0
            No, everything is clear with communism, but socialism is as real as capitalism. In Russia, something special turns out in general, I don’t even know what to call it.
    5. stolz
      stolz 16 November 2017 10: 19 New
      +6
      A circus performance called "Elections" begins. The team of clowns is the same, without changes. Together, in a single impulse, she began to suppress new ones who want to perform in this gala performance. We wish them success.
      1. Esoteric
        Esoteric 16 November 2017 13: 14 New
        +2
        Quote: Stolz
        A circus performance called "Elections" begins.

        The most entertaining circus performance awaits us after the end of Putin’s last presidential term ... Here we will have a good laugh, who will survive, of course ...
    6. Romey
      Romey 16 November 2017 10: 20 New
      +9
      An opportunist and renegade in the service of the presidential administration. He had a real opportunity to help create a bloc of all national-patriotic forces, put forward a common strong candidate and fix political positions before the inevitable shocks and the threat of revenge demshiza. Instead, Zyuganov simply torpedoed this idea and I wonder how honest patriots-communists like Sobolev or Grudinin will react to this. And in general, what is Gennady Andreich and the leadership in general thinking about? Or think for them in the department of domestic politics of the AP?
      1. badens1111
        badens1111 16 November 2017 10: 47 New
        +2
        Quote: romey
        Instead, Zyuganov simply torpedoed this idea.

        Come on ...
        Here is the answer for you, but at the same time understand for yourself the name "torpedoes"
        On December 23-24, the Communist Party’s pre-election congress will be held, at the beginning of which Zyuganov will announce his decision whether to run for president or not. If so, the rest of the event will be devoted to the theses of the election campaign and the appointment of proxies in the regions. If not, then the election of another candidate from the Communist Party will be held.
        So, he doesn’t go to the polls, he will be another candidate. We are waiting for the congress.

        By the way, the starting federal campaign promises to be unique for the Communists not only because of Zyuganov’s absence: for the first time two “red candidates” will take part in the presidential election. More precisely, one is definitely from the Reds, but the second ... a renegade, a mimicrant under the Reds = Suraikin.

        A week before the Communist Party, the party "Communists of Russia" will announce its nominee. Obviously, they will be 39-year-old Maxim Suraikin.-project of Surkov's laboratory.
        Well, that’s true ... http: //lawinrussia.ru/content/psevdolevye
        Everything under the election started to fuss, gurgle and smell ...
        1. Romey
          Romey 16 November 2017 10: 57 New
          0
          So, he doesn’t go to the polls, he will be another candidate. We are waiting for the congress.

          So after all, he already announced his decision, adding a message about the support of his candidacy from the regional party organizations. The Congress will probably just fix the result.
          1. badens1111
            badens1111 16 November 2017 14: 33 New
            0
            Quote: romey
            So after all, he has already announced his decision, pr

            Who told you this? Journalists from Channel 1, as always, distorting what was said?
            Mdya ... here are gullibles ... as if not gossip so bam, I suffered to write the province, as not a fact. So silently and not to hear
            Communist Party spokesman Alexander Yushchenko has denied reports that Communist Party leader Gennady Zyuganov will run for president of Russia. According to him, the question of nominating the Communist leader as a candidate is still open, and the final decision will be made only after the party’s congress in December.
            https://www.stav.kp.ru/daily/26753/3784222/
            1. Romey
              Romey 16 November 2017 15: 48 New
              +1
              Well, God forbid! Guys, you have a lot of wonderful people in the party besides G.A. Zyuganov.
      2. Ivan Ivanov
        Ivan Ivanov 16 November 2017 11: 35 New
        0
        Quote: romey
        An opportunist and renegade in the service of the presidential administration. He had a real opportunity to help create a bloc of all national-patriotic forces

        Nationalists and monarchists there too? Not the fact that the idea is good. How then to come to an agreement in case of fundamental disagreements?
        1. Romey
          Romey 16 November 2017 15: 38 New
          +1
          And what are our fundamental disagreements, if our views are identical on the future structure of the economy and the revival of Russia, on specific goals and objectives? Our whole problem is the past, and looking only there we forget about the future. Instead of Zyuganov Boldyrev or Grudinin, nominate colleagues from the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, agree to the formation of a government of popular trust, and we, supporters of the PDS of the NDPR, communists, conservatives, nationalists, monarchists, individual representatives of the national and patriotic-minded bourgeoisie, who are disgusted to see what our common Motherland, we will support you. As in 1993 or 1996. We will rest on ideology and historical problems a century ago - we will bury Russia forever. We do not have time for ideological squabbles, all discussions after the victory. No, not at these elections, but when the moment will come for the inevitable collapse of the semi-colonial comprador regime and we will be able to prevent the open return of the demshiza as a united front.
    7. To be or not to be
      To be or not to be 16 November 2017 10: 27 New
      +1
      What Sue. What XU. two of a Kind !
      With a common objective function, to fool people laughing
    8. Stas157
      Stas157 16 November 2017 10: 38 New
      +9
      Quote: Ami du peuple
      And I am ashamed of Zyuganov.

      That's what I thought, reading an article, that someone would write this. And it is necessary, the first comment about it! And you’re not ashamed of yourself, are you our bashful? Equaled both the Communists and the horses! Or, am I still wrong, are you not ashamed of Sobchak?
      Quote: To be or not to be
      What Sue. What XU. two of a Kind !
      With a common objective function, to fool people laughing

      Still the same! Who is your honest then? Maybe this trader Putin and Medvedev? Or some kind of Zhirinovsky? Call if easy. I’m sure you won’t do it.
      Quote: vladimirvn
      Is he ashamed of the country ??? And what did he do to make the country better, with such a mandate of trust from the people that he had all these years ?!

      Was he the president? What could he do? Raise the country to the barricades, do you propose this?
      1. To be or not to be
        To be or not to be 16 November 2017 10: 53 New
        +5
        To argue with isisms? Why, Yes, there is no. Ism ... then solid fishing
        ... Zyu .. at the head of the Communist Party for decades ... Theory NO. Practice-NO. But. Comes out with red here am such a person
        1. badens1111
          badens1111 16 November 2017 10: 58 New
          +4
          Quote: To be or not to be
          Theories NO. Practices NO

          Lies.
          We look we read the same Program.
          We look at what Grudinin achieved, we look at what Ivan Ivanovich Kazankov achieved in the forms of the FOLK enterprise and we understand, for this, the future, and this is the development of both theory and practice.http: //www.sovross.ru/articles/1625/ 3640
          7 and
          https://www.leftfront.org/?p=1018
          What are you not happy with?
          http://dev2.nakanune.ru/news/2017/11/14/22489260/
          1. IS-80_RVGK2
            IS-80_RVGK2 16 November 2017 11: 57 New
            +1
            Quote: badens1111
            Lies.

            Yes? But will it not make it difficult for you to give a link to any works that clearly explain the reasons for the previous failure? And as for the practice, I do not see any distinct agitation among the population. It’s just not in fact. There is no clear explanation of how we will carry out the transition from one socio-economic formation to another. I especially liked the line about opportunism in the Communist Party program. The opportunists write that they are fighting opportunism.
            1. badens1111
              badens1111 16 November 2017 14: 48 New
              +1
              Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
              Communist Party program line about opportunism

              Receive and sign.
              Incidentally, I.V. spoke quite accurately about the approach of the Communists to solving problems. Stalin during his speech at the XVIII Congress of the CPSU (B.): “It is impossible to demand from the classics of Marxism, separated from our time by a period of 45 - 55 years, that they foresee all and all sorts of cases of zigzags of history. It would be ridiculous to demand that the classics of Marxism develop ready-made solutions for us on any and all theoretical questions that may to arise in every single country after 50 - 100 years, so that we, the descendants of the classics of Marxism, have the opportunity to lie calmly on the stove and chew ready-made solutions, but we can and must demand from our Marxists-Leninists that our time is not limited to separate general provisions of Marxism, so that they delve into the essence of Marxism and, based on the essence of Marxism, learn to concretize certain general provisions, refine and improve them ...

              What kind of "betrayal" and "renegade" are we talking about ?! And only overtly blinded ultra-left orthodoxes can ignore this circumstance. Anyone who is guided by the aforementioned Stalinist attitude, they will certainly be blamed for the mythical "opportunism", etc.
              Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
              There is no clear explanation of how we will carry out the transition from one socio-economic formation to another.

              So the Suraikins have ?? Yes, come on ..
              If we look at the contents of the program of the same Surayka traitorous flock (as well as with their election manifesto under the pathetic title “Ten Stalinist blows on capitalism”), then we will see their palliative and very inconsistent character (and this is rather mildly said). It is known that the key issue is resolving the issue of ownership. Private ownership of the means of production does not consistently solve the range of problems facing the economy, destroys the social environment of the common man. In addition, Suraikin people do not say a word about Russia's withdrawal from the WTO (see their election program). That is, they believe that it is possible to switch to socialism, preserving the rule of foreign capital! As if he would provide an opportunity to take such a step! Delirium and only.
              So how is it with "Comrade Maximus" who in fact is a provocateur and strikebreaker?
              Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
              And as for the practice, I do not see any distinct agitation among the population.

              The regions led by Levchenko and Lokot, despite the rampage of anger and insinuations, including from the Urallevaks, speak differently.
              For some reason, the same Grudinin, an outstanding manager of agriculture, is by no means on the side of the ultra and just leftists, behind whom, apart from the cod of phrases and drumming that they say the mustache is gone, there is nothing but he is on the side of the Communist Party, why?
              You, ultra and leftists, what can you show for yourself, except for constant chattering, screaming and screaming, but in fact the game is on the enemy’s side, on the side of the already tired oligarchy, are you keeping them or something?
              It’s fashionable to give the five of them a slap in the face, they beat the enemy with their fists, but you don’t have an understanding of this, and by this you are just a ballast hanging with kettlebells.
              Notice to myself, I am not a member of the party and have never been there, and I understand the harmfulness of your chatter .. but you, no, for whom in this case you will work, if not against the left movement as a whole?
              And the last.
              The bow between nationalists, Urallevak and liberals, as Ukraine has shown, is fatal, even if the slogans of the ultra-Levacs seem to be about some kind of justice and some good, in fact, everything turns out the way it happened in the neighboring country, do you want this?
              1. IS-80_RVGK2
                IS-80_RVGK2 16 November 2017 18: 53 New
                0
                Quote: badens1111
                What kind of "betrayal" and "renegade" are we talking about ?! And only overtly blinded ultra-left orthodoxes can ignore this circumstance.

                Here it is. Now political, further on Lenin, that’s what it is called. I don’t have to hang noodles on my ears. Opportunism is also opportunism in Africa. And you are very comfortable. Who criticizes us is a retrograde, a vile conservative and generally behind the times. Yes, all of you in bulk, Stalin quoted by you would at least miserably throw out the party.
                Quote: badens1111
                So the Suraikins have ?? Yes, come on ..

                You do not take the conversation aside. To be honest, at the moment, it doesn’t matter what a certain Suraykin has there. I asked you to provide a link to materials that clearly explain the reasons for the failure of socialism in the USSR. Give a link or admit that you do not have one.
                Quote: badens1111
                The regions led by Levchenko and Lokot, despite the rampage of anger and insinuations, including from the Urallevaks, speak differently.

                I’m not interested in separately the regions where Levchenko and Lokot sit at the helm, I’m interested in how the whole country is campaigning.
                Quote: badens1111
                It’s fashionable to give the five of them a slap in the face, they beat the enemy with their fists, but you don’t have an understanding of this, and by this you are just a ballast hanging with kettlebells.

                And let you keep your fantasies to yourself? Why the hell did you write me to ultra-left? What do you even know about me? Nothing.
                Quote: badens1111
                Notice to myself, I am not a member of the party and have never been there, and I understand the harmfulness of your chatter .. but you, no, for whom in this case you will work, if not against the left movement as a whole?

                Why so? Since you are the right Communist and ardent agitator for the Communist Party from all sides? Maybe everything is explained simply and you are a communist exactly as long as the denyuzhka for campaigning goes?
                1. badens1111
                  badens1111 16 November 2017 19: 32 New
                  0
                  Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                  Yes, all of you in bulk, Stalin quoted by you would at least miserably throw out the party.

                  You do not understand what is said?
                  Stalin during his speech at the 45th Congress of the CPSU (B.): “One cannot demand from the classics of Marxism, separated from our time, from 55 to 50 years old, that they foresee all and all sorts of cases of zigzags of history. It would be ridiculous to demand that the classics of Marxism work out for us, ready-made solutions to all and any theoretical questions that may arise in each individual country after 100 - XNUMX years, so that we, the descendants of the classics of Marxism, have the opportunity to lie calmly on the stove and chew ready-made solutions. But we can and must demand that Marxist-Leninists of our time, so that they are not limited to memorizing certain general principles of Marxism, that they understand the essence of Marxism and, proceeding from the essence of Marxism, learn to concretize certain general principles, refine and improve them ... "
                  Who in your ideologists suddenly drew such a profile that even outdid Stalin? Max Suraikin or something? Well, yes ... they found authority ... cod yes, a lot, no sense. No one.
                  Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                  I’m not interested in separately the regions where Levchenko and Lokot sit at the helm, I’m interested in how the whole country is campaigning.

                  It’s satisfactory in the whole country. There are places and misfortunes, but what do you mean, do you have the central heating channel at your disposal? Really ...?
                  Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                  And let you keep your fantasies to yourself? Why the hell did you write me to ultra-left? What do you even know about me? Nothing.

                  Well, I’m not attacking you, but why did you attack me, didn’t I point out specifically and incorrectly, point out specifically who is the weight?
                  Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                  Since you are the right communist and ardent agitator from all sides

                  Again not true.
                  Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                  Maybe everything is explained simply and you are a communist exactly as long as the denyuzhka for campaigning goes?

                  And again speculation.
                  It seems that you are not what you pretend to be what you really are. Regrettably.
                  Figures from the "Communists of Russia" and the "CPSU" are very offended when they are called spoilers.
                  And even sue. But there is no arguing against mathematics. The statistics of the number of invalid ballots clearly shows that voting for these parties is really, first and foremost, voting by mistake. These votes were intended by the Communist Party, but they were stolen. And by the way, pay attention: no other parliamentary party, except the Communist Party, has spoilers with similar names. This clearly shows who really is the opposition to the current government, and who only imitates the opposition.
                  1. IS-80_RVGK2
                    IS-80_RVGK2 17 November 2017 09: 38 New
                    0
                    Quote: badens1111
                    You do not understand what is said?

                    I just understand Stalin perfectly. And that is why your vanguard and modern quasicommunism is clear to me as a day. In the Communist Party of the Communist Party there are no more Communists than in the Republican Party of the USA, well, except probably extremely naive people.
                    Quote: badens1111
                    Who in your ideologists suddenly drew such a profile that even outdid Stalin? Max Suraikin or something? Well, yes ... they found authority ... cod yes, a lot, no sense. No one.

                    What do you constantly fuss about this your Suraykin to me? Until you mentioned him, I didn’t even know who he was.
                    Quote: badens1111
                    The whole country is satisfactory.

                    That is, translating into a five-point system in three. And if you face the truth, even that is not there.
                    Quote: badens1111
                    In some places, there are troubles, but what do you mean, do you have the central heating channel at your disposal? Really ...?

                    Did Lenin have a canal at his disposal? Or maybe you still need to fine-tune the work in the field in party cells and take your ass off the seat not only before the elections, so that you poorly chat with the people for half an hour and promise a lot of things without explaining how all this can be done in the spirit of all the other capitalist parties. Need to work. Where is the field work? I don’t see her, and only I would be okay.
                    Quote: badens1111
                    Well, I’m not attacking you, but why did you attack me, didn’t I point out specifically and incorrectly, point out specifically who is the weight?

                    I ask you specific questions, you don’t want to answer them, you start to bustle, rush at me with some delusional accusations and in the end you start to make a victim of yourself. Well, these are so mossy demagogic tricks that there is nowhere else to go.
                    Quote: badens1111
                    Again not true.

                    A person agitates for communism while not being a communist. Now this is how to understand? I have one explanation so far. You are a paid promoter. Of which, before the election, just herds in the media are worn.
                    Quote: badens1111
                    It seems that you are not what you pretend to be what you really are. Regrettably.

                    The thief shouts - "hold the thief!" It's funny
                    1. badens1111
                      badens1111 17 November 2017 18: 22 New
                      0
                      Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                      I ask you specific questions, you don’t want to answer them, you start to bustle, rush at me with some delusional accusations and in the end you start to make a victim of yourself. Well, these are so mossy demagogic tricks that there is nowhere else to go.

                      You wrote nonsense. Take these questions for example to Afonin, I am responsible for myself, as I think, but not in the answer for what and how they think there.
                      So all your ardor, idle.
                      Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                      A person agitates for communism while not being a communist. Now this is how to understand?

                      Yes, that's how it is to be understood, does it really not reach that not having a cardboard is confirmation of what Idea a person adheres to?
                      Equally, such a question can be addressed to you, there is a lot of criticism, but there is no indication from whom you are engaged in this criticism.
                      Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                      You are a paid promoter. Of which, before the election, just herds in the media are worn.

                      I repeat, utter stupidity. However, it’s absolutely violet to me what other labels will appear. I have my point of view, you are engaged in idle talk and criticism without speaking for anyone.
                      Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                      The thief shouts - "hold the thief!"

                      It is applicable to you, to the fullest extent, this is the demagogic device of those whom I have spoken about.
                      1. IS-80_RVGK2
                        IS-80_RVGK2 17 November 2017 21: 19 New
                        0
                        Quote: badens1111
                        You wrote nonsense. Take these questions for example to Afonin, I am responsible for myself, as I think, but not in the answer for what and how they think there.

                        I asked you to answer for Afonin? Again hit the verbiage?
                        It was your ardor. You curl there like in a frying pan. And the questions were not answered.
                        Quote: badens1111
                        Yes, that's how it is to be understood, does it really not reach that not having a cardboard is confirmation of what Idea a person adheres to?

                        Clear. You are a communist without a cardboard, or rather without a cardboard, and not a communist. laughing
                        Quote: badens1111
                        Equally, such a question can be addressed to you, there is a lot of criticism, but there is no indication from whom you are engaged in this criticism.

                        Yes with me, your cheap propaganda crashed. Grandfather Zyuganov in vain paid you a denyuzhku. Manipulator you are useless. I criticize from all progressive humanity and completely free.smile
                        Quote: badens1111
                        I have my point of view, you are engaged in idle talk and criticism without speaking for anyone speaking out.

                        Your point of view is just idle talk. What you have clearly shown.
                        Quote: badens1111
                        It is applicable to you, to the fullest extent, this is the demagogic device of those whom I have spoken about.

                        Do not try to talk to me, it will not work. smile
                      2. badens1111
                        badens1111 17 November 2017 22: 01 New
                        0
                        Quote:
                        I asked you to answer for Afonin? Again hit the verbiage?

                        You forgot how to read, as well as understand the meaning of the written?
                        Quote: badens1111
                        Quote: badens1111
                        You wrote nonsense. Take these questions for example to Afonin, I am responsible for myself, as I think, but not in the answer for what and how they think there.

                        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                        You curl there like in a frying pan. And the questions were not answered.

                        It’s of little interest to me where you curl and why, but the words circling are not very smart. You know how to do it.
                        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                        Yes with me, your cheap propaganda crashed. Grandfather Zyuganov in vain paid you a denyuzhku. Manipulator you are useless. I criticize from all progressive humanity and completely free

                        Another stupid thing. However, if you are so pleased to take it, consider pre-submitting evidence of your lies.
                        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                        Your point of view is just idle talk. What you have clearly shown.

                        I agree with your assessment of YOU myself, I have no objections. The true Suraikinist is, therefore, a mimicrant.
                        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                        Do not try to talk to me, it will not work.

                        except you, chatter here, no one is engaged.
        2. Romey
          Romey 16 November 2017 11: 10 New
          +2
          There is a theory, there is a practice. There is a program 95% coinciding with the programs of other patriotic opposition forces, including the right. Those who were called red-brown in the 90s. There is a real opportunity to work for the future. It is not visible only the political will, integrity and common sense of the leadership of the Communist Party. Some sort of genotbe ... Well, Gennady Andreich will get his 13% of the vote, then a couple of years will be judged for fraud in the elections. That's all. And apparently it suits him quite well.
          1. badens1111
            badens1111 16 November 2017 11: 40 New
            +1
            Quote: romey
            There is a theory, there is a practice. There is a program 95% coinciding with the programs of others

            So, don’t betray what doesn’t correspond to reality. The Communist Party program and its postulates are 90 percent muffled up by all kinds of imitators, from LDPR to SR and others like that. and CP other trifles, promises but does nothing and will not do, the Communist Party does.
            And those conditions and within the conditions created in the country.
            Quote: romey
            Well, Gennady Andreich will get his 13% of the vote, then a couple of years later will be judged for fraud in the elections. That's all. And apparently it suits him perfectly.

            What did you actually cling to Zyuganov’s physics? Is he the personification of IDEA? Or is it still not him? And what about the party as such? And who goes to vote, is he for himself?
            You really don’t see how elections are so heap of some quasiparticles, and then when you think we’ll get it, you’ve spread it again like you, the result is a bunch of phantoms that nobody needs, in the form of supposedly “left” parties .. Is this obvious to you , not?
            However, the conversation is not about parliamentary elections, but about something else.
            And the other implies, you choose what?
            What is the further vector of the country's development, in what direction and for whom? That is the trap.
            In relation to this, in my opinion, it looks like this: the elections were held, Putin won, but the single candidate of the left forces takes second place, which means that taking this into account, Putin himself is obliged to form the Government not on the basis of the well-fed party of universal approval of EP , a complete cast from the late CPSU, but on the basis of what the people gave out, directly showing what they expect from the President.
            And we have a circus, Polonsky dogs, supposedly the opposition ... and even this presidential clowning is torn ..
            1. IS-80_RVGK2
              IS-80_RVGK2 16 November 2017 12: 13 New
              0
              Quote: badens1111
              What did you attach yourself to Zyuganov’s physics?

              And the fact that for many he is just the personification of the party, as in his time, Stalin. And he gives an extra reason for his behavior to kick the Communists. The idea is that it is an idea. But the appearance of the carriers of this idea also plays a role.
              Quote: badens1111
              You really don’t see how it’s not elections that are so many quasi-parties

              All this is visible. As you can see Zyuganov’s behavior, which is well characterized by his famous phrase about Russia that has exhausted the limit of revolutions. Yes, he will win the election tomorrow; he will not know at a loss what to do with the power that has fallen into his hands.
              Quote: badens1111
              In relation to this, in my opinion, it looks like this: the elections took place, Putin won, but the single candidate of the left forces takes second place

              At the moment, the probability of seeing a live Santa Claus is several times higher than this option.
              Quote: badens1111
              What is the further vector of the country's development, in what direction and for whom? That is the trap.

              There will be a slow dive into the swamp. Which, in principle, our government has designated with its economic forecasts. However, if the capitalists unleash another global war, the situation could change dramatically.
              1. badens1111
                badens1111 16 November 2017 17: 12 New
                0
                Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                The idea is that it is an idea. But the appearance of the carriers of this idea also plays a role.

                From the same ... well then, let’s we choose not by the mind, but by the pretty face, for example, Chef Chef’s anfisk, what is bad? And the physics is cute and everything else is beyond measure, but the question is, does she even think about something in the breaks between shopping and champagne in bed?
                But what is bad in this case, Katerina, who is Gordon? The blonde is all \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\:: t: nbsp; well-groomed, the lawyer for the rights of women is beating, can you choose her? ? In general, then it is not clear why she was going to the presidency, enough of Putin is sitting in the place, owning the situation ..
                Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                At the moment, the probability of seeing a live Santa Claus is several times higher than this option.

                Well, based on the fact that everything is in Zyuganov’s physics for you, then yes, for sure, get Zhirik, a cool clown and they will vote for him, though then they will scratch the shard again and ask so badly. But alas, they made a choice.
                Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                There will be a slow dive into the swamp. Which, in principle, our government designated by its economic forecasts.

                If, you and others, go for all kinds of spoilers. Deceptions and clowns like worshipers, everything will end even faster and worse. Clowning calculation is just that.
                Think, who needs clowning in a matter of principle, the choice of the leader of the country? What causes such hysteria from the side of the dogs and the like?
            2. Romey
              Romey 16 November 2017 16: 29 New
              0
              So, don’t betray what doesn’t correspond to reality. The Communist Party program and its postulates are 90 percent muffled by all kinds of imitators, from LDPR to SR and others like them.

              Colleague! You did not understand. I do not consider the clowns you listed above even as politicians. Only a very indecent word is spoken in the language. I meant the PDS program of the NDSR. Personally, I see this format as the most promising and relevant modern realities. I hope to agree.
              What did you actually cling to Zyuganov’s physics? Is he the personification of IDEA? Or is it still not him? And what about the party as such? And who goes to vote, is he for himself?

              Sorry, but the person is also something that means. If you drop the accusations of renegade and other things, then even in this case G.A. Zyuganov is a typical loser, which cannot but affect the political reputation of the party. IMHO, the view from the side of the voter who is tired of all the current clowning with old characters.
              And the other implies, you choose what?

              We choose a program, a change of course, a vector of development ... Therefore, we, as air, need a joint effort.
              1. badens1111
                badens1111 16 November 2017 17: 23 New
                +1
                Quote: romey
                I meant the PDS program of the NDSR. Personally, I see this format as the most promising and relevant modern realities. I hope to agree.

                Talks and negotiations as far as I know go, but there it will be seen.
                Quote: romey
                then even in this case G.A. Zyuganov typical loser

                An imposed opinion. If you shoot in an appropriate form, then your acquaintances after a certain time will start to treat you not very well. If you submit material that is voiced by the same Uncle Zyu, so that besides the meaning of what has been said, only a general phrase is heard, you will speak as you speak now.
                But in this case, the issue is not in him; he will most likely not go to the polls.
                Was Medvedev elected-lucky ?? Was Yeltsin successful with his 2% popularity? Or did everyone decide two types who voted for Yeltsin-Lebed and Zhirinovsky plus the threat of bloody reprisal in the country with everyone who could not stand Yeltsin’s spirit? Plus a lot of money spent to the election fraud 1996.
                Quote: romey
                We choose a program, a change of course, a vector of development ... Therefore, we, as air, need a joint effort.
                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pd-yy7AYcT4
                Well then, do not fight against the Communist Party, but join forces, that’s why I need to explain the simplest things to the non-partisan ....
                1. Romey
                  Romey 16 November 2017 18: 40 New
                  +1
                  Well then, do not fight against the Communist Party, but join forces, that’s why I need to explain the simplest things to the non-partisan ....

                  So I am about the same. The main thing is that there is reciprocity. Personally, my position is: to end the civil war in our heads, to take into account the mistakes of the past, both imperial and Soviet, to analyze modern realities and move to the future ... In any case, the useless butts of monarchists and communists in the current difficult situation are extremely harmful. Here's an example of the latest scandal with “Matilda”: another bullshit film of the next bullshit director threw firewood into the fire tearing, I believe not without the help of the authorities. Believe me, there is more that unites us than it divides us.
                  1. badens1111
                    badens1111 17 November 2017 18: 28 New
                    0
                    Quote: romey
                    So I am about the same. The main thing is that there is reciprocity

                    I agree.
                    Quote: romey
                    Personally, my position is: to end the civil war in my head, to take into account the mistakes of the past, both imperial and Soviet, to analyze modern realities and move to the future ..

                    I support the same.
                    Quote: romey
                    In any case, the useless butts of monarchists and communists in the current difficult situation are extremely harmful.

                    And here ... there is, so to say, a part of those same monarchists oriented towards the Anglo-Saxon varinat of the accession of the offspring of the Windsor in Russia, and there can be no compromise with these, which concerns those who are on the left, Ulalevachki with a clear Trotskyist phrase are equally unacceptable. to agree if the leaders of all movements extinguish their exorbitant ambitions with the desire to climb into the only leaders.
                    Quote: romey
                    Believe me, there is more that unites us than it divides us.

                    For me, those who perceive the History of Russia as a continuous and indivisible process, with all victories and defeats, are like-minded people, but those who try to tell a fairy tale like the well-known characters here that the Red Project is something foreign, worthless and criminal cannot be as something suitable for the country.
                    Quote: romey
                    Here, for example, take the last scandal with Matilda: another bullshit film of the next bullshit director threw firewood into the fire, I think not without the help of the authorities

                    Not without it .. to whom it is beneficial to tear apart in society.
          2. To be or not to be
            To be or not to be 16 November 2017 16: 41 New
            0
            That both classes and class struggle recognize ??? Or is it no longer relevant in modern conditions?
        3. Stas157
          Stas157 16 November 2017 11: 19 New
          +6
          Quote: To be or not to be
          here is solid fishing

          What happened on fishing terrible that you did not like Zyuganov so disliked? Killed whom? Or did you want to show that he goes fishing with Medvedev and Zhirinovsky, and thereby messed himself up?
          Quote: To be or not to be
          ..Zyu .. at the head of the Communist Party for decades ... Theory NO. Practice-NO. But. Appears with a red face like that am

          I agree with that. But why then immediately align it with the Horse? After all, the current president does not have this either. There is no ideology (except liberal!), A coherent economic program ... However, no one is equal to Ksyushad with Putin!
          1. weksha50
            weksha50 16 November 2017 11: 46 New
            +2
            Quote: Stas157
            What happened during fishing terrible that you did not like Zyuganov so disliked? Killed whom?


            And I remembered something about the bathhouse in Belovezhskaya Pushcha ... They took a steam bath, bblinnn ... recourse
            Now - for picnics and fishing different - an allergy ... I’m waiting for everything: what other dirty tricks will I get drunk? laughing
          2. To be or not to be
            To be or not to be 16 November 2017 16: 46 New
            0
            Why align - but only because it exploits the bright ideals of the elderly and old women.
      2. To be or not to be
        To be or not to be 16 November 2017 11: 06 New
        +2
        "What could he do? Raise the country to the barricades, do you propose this?"
        That’s what you don’t have to do in the current situation - to raise the country to the barricades. This is what the West and the USA are waiting for. This is the path to collapse. To collapse .. The country needs a calm internal situation.
        Communist Party has something to do For example. especially in the places where the dominance of the power of officials. The power of officials and their petty-bourgeois insides washed away more than one state.
        1. badens1111
          badens1111 16 November 2017 11: 27 New
          +2
          Quote: To be or not to be
          Communist Party has something to do

          She does it, but what do the “imitators from the Reds” in the form of the “Communists of Russia” do, where are the shopkeepers and the sackers a dime a dozen?
    9. creak
      creak 16 November 2017 10: 39 New
      +1
      Quote: Ami du peuple
      changed communist beliefs

      And why do you think he had them? An ordinary man with a party card, which was only a means of successfully climbing the career ladder ... Yes, and his environment is not better. ..For example, the notorious late Voronenkov is a member of the Communist Party faction in the State Duma ...
      Verily, what is pop, such is the coming ...
      1. badens1111
        badens1111 16 November 2017 10: 59 New
        +4
        Quote: ranger
        Verily, what is pop, such is the coming ...

        Let's look at the number of traitors in the Liberal Democratic Party, Slovak Republic and United Russia? Remember Apple? Want?
        There are mistakes, regrettably ... but only he who doesn’t ever do anything is not mistaken.
        1. creak
          creak 16 November 2017 11: 25 New
          +2
          [quote] [badens1111
          Let's look at the number of traitors in the LDPR, SR and EP? Would you like? Quote

          Well, on your advice, let's look at the same EP - that we will see a considerable number of repainted former members of the CPSU - changed their shoes on time and again in the ranks of another party - the main thing is that it is at the helm ....
          For example, a prominent United Russia and patriot Zheleznyak, who does not crawl out of TV, this failed political commissar and former member of the CPSU — who do you think he is? A man who betrayed the ideals of socialism or a true patriot of Russia? And he sent his daughters to study in England solely from patriotic motives, well, how did Peter 1 noble children? And he’s not the only one there - you don’t want to take a closer look, according to your advice?
          PS In general, the speech in my comment is specifically about Zyuganoy and Co., posing as true Marxists of Leninists, and not about those who changed party affiliation two or three times, in accordance with the current political situation ...
          1. badens1111
            badens1111 16 November 2017 17: 26 New
            0
            And why aren’t you shouting so violently about it regarding EP, but are you so keen to kick the Communist Party? It looks strange.
            Which side do you belong to
            Quote: ranger
            true Marxists of Leninists


            Quote: ranger
            and not about those who two-three times changed their party affiliation, in accordance with the current political situation ...

            Oh how ... well do I have to. Do you have to believe this in your opinion?
            He accused some of them that they were supposedly not communists, but he was afraid to say a second word, famously ... Are you also changing in connection with the situation?
    10. siberalt
      siberalt 16 November 2017 10: 48 New
      +2
      And let Zu ask the Russians how much ashamed of him? what
      1. Stas157
        Stas157 16 November 2017 11: 24 New
        +5
        Quote: siberalt
        And let Zu ask the Russians how much ashamed of him?

        I think, all the same, less than Ksyushad! But then let's go further, ask how many Russians are ashamed of Putin and Medvedev? ... I am sure that there will be many.
        So what did you want to achieve with your question?
      2. To be or not to be
        To be or not to be 16 November 2017 11: 26 New
        0
        Presidential elections in Russia
        June 1 and July 16, 3

        Voter turnout: 69,8% in the first round, 69,4% in the second
        1 round
        1. Yeltsin, Boris Nikolaevich
        26 665 495 35,28
        2. Zyuganov, Gennady Andreevich
        24 211 686 32,03

        2 round
        1. Yeltsin Boris Nikolaevich
        40 402 349 53,82
        2. Zyuganov Gennady Andreevich
        30 104 589 40,31
        “On February 20, 2012, at a meeting with representatives of the“ non-systemic opposition, ”President D. Medvedev announced the 1996 election literally as follows:“ It is unlikely that anyone has any doubts about who won the 1996 presidential election. It was not Boris Nikolaevich Yeltsin "
        2.
        26 March 2000 year
        1. Putin, Vladimir Vladimirovich
        39 740 467 52,94
        2. Zyuganov, Gennady Andreevich
        21 928 468 29,21

        March 3, 14
        Communist Party set
        6. Kharitonov, Nikolai Mikhailovich, Russian political and statesman, deputy of the State Duma of the IV convocation from the Communist Party faction, member of the Agrarian Party of Russia.
        1. Putin Vladimir Vladimirovich
        49 565 238 71,31
        2. Kharitonov Nikolay Mikhailovich
        9 513 313 13,69

        March 4, 2
        Dmitry Medvedev 70,28
        Zyuganov Gennady Andreevich 17,72

        5 March 4, 2012
        1. Putin Vladimir Vladimirovich 45 602 075 63,60
        2. Zyuganov Gennady Andreevich 12 318 353 17,18
        1. Stas157
          Stas157 16 November 2017 11: 44 New
          +6
          Quote: To be or not to be
          Presidential elections in Russia

          Judging by the elections, Zyuganov’s dynamics are sad. If at the very beginning he could argue with candidates from power, then this hour he openly merges votes. Therefore, it is clear that the Communist Party urgently needs to change the candidate. It won’t be any better.
          But, all this is not an excuse for Zyuganov to align with horses.
    11. Ivan Ivanov
      Ivan Ivanov 16 November 2017 11: 46 New
      0
      Quote: Ami du peuple
      And I am ashamed of Zyuganov. The revisionist and compromiser who exchanged communist beliefs for buns from the government.


      According to the MBH, in option 96 there were 2: Yeltsin’s victory in the elections or power dispersal and the ban of the Communist Party, an alternative to Yeltsin’s victory was the introduction of a state of emergency. what kind of buns are there. it was about whether or not there was a civil war.
    12. ID90
      ID90 16 November 2017 12: 08 New
      0
      Quote: Ami du peuple
      And I am ashamed of Zyuganov. The revisionist and compromiser who exchanged communist beliefs for buns from the government. In 1996, he had a chance, but the "eternal oppositionist" had missed this chance ... in general.
      So now Ksyushad is the most worthy opponent for him, and I won’t be surprised if she collects more votes than “daddy Zyu”.

      the manual oppositionist decided to have a good laugh.
    13. Primoos
      Primoos 16 November 2017 13: 42 New
      +1
      Quote: Ami du peuple
      And I am ashamed of Zyuganov. The revisionist and compromiser who exchanged communist beliefs for buns from the government. In 1996, he had a chance, but the "eternal oppositionist" had missed this chance ... in general.
      So now Ksyushad is the most worthy opponent for him, and I won’t be surprised if she collects more votes than “daddy Zyu”.

      But I’m not ashamed of anyone! You won’t be ashamed of any stuff. The main thing is that you shouldn’t be ashamed of yourself, for your actions.
    14. Chaos
      Chaos 16 November 2017 17: 59 New
      0
      comrade Zyu no matter how you twist for Russia, for your homeland. A horse D2 and the Crimea will give up and sell the whole country, we are for her slaves, not people.
  2. vladimirvn
    vladimirvn 16 November 2017 10: 01 New
    +7
    Is he ashamed of the country ??? And what did he do to make the country better, with such a mandate of trust from the people that he had all these years ?!
    1. badens1111
      badens1111 16 November 2017 10: 05 New
      +3
      Quote: vladimirvn
      Is he ashamed of the country ??? What did he do

      Let me inquire, but what have you done?
      1. vladimirvn
        vladimirvn 16 November 2017 10: 34 New
        0
        Many things. And for this "comrade" voted for many years.
        1. badens1111
          badens1111 16 November 2017 10: 54 New
          +4
          Quote: vladimirvn
          And for this "comrade" voted for many years.

          They did it right. Criticism is useful, criticism is in the hands of those who have made your life not very fun.
          Did you have the opportunity to read the State Duma’s press releases on symbolic votes? And did you speak out on these or those persons? I just had ... I saw Zhirik, for example, and then Zhirik, with the hands of these head-clawed members of the parting party of one clown, with joy for all that is offered by ER. It is asked, so who is our simulacrum, and who is the responsible opposition?
          The Industrial Policy Act, whose? Yes, from the Communist Party. And even the Erovtsy are forced to vote for it, because they were ordered from above, the result is obvious.
          In general, there will be a congress of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, there you’ll see who they will choose as candidates, for now everything, fortune-telling on coffee grounds and throwing mud at political opponents.
          “By the way, about the communists ... Many today say:“ Oh, these communists are some kind of nightmare! ” And when you ask: "Why a nightmare? Explain specifically?" "No one can really answer. They’re becoming nonsense. I would advise those who have such verbiage to read the program of the Communist Party. Incidentally, it contains a lot of concrete proposals, and not just like other parties, slogans and slogans, and it is shown in concrete figures what happened to our economy after the collapse of the USSR. Impressive !!! "M. Zadornov.
          http://www.sovross.ru/articles/1625/36397
          1. Ivan Ivanov
            Ivan Ivanov 16 November 2017 11: 54 New
            +1
            I agree, Zhirik is a classical starball, and what do we want from the SJ with a minority in the Duma, and completely liberal economic institutions?
      2. To be or not to be
        To be or not to be 16 November 2017 10: 56 New
        +1
        "Let me inquire, but what have you done?"
        W S AND W A L !! ... like millions of people .. Moreover, he is a deputy of the people = how they like to say "servant of the people" .. laughing
        1. badens1111
          badens1111 16 November 2017 11: 25 New
          0
          Quote: To be or not to be
          W S AND W A L !!

          Oh .. well, Mr. Survivor is forced to tell you, if Yeltsin had succeeded in banning the Communist Party, then YOU WOULD NOT SURVIVE at all.
          1. To be or not to be
            To be or not to be 16 November 2017 11: 36 New
            +1
            Yeah. Tits laughing would be taken from us ..laughing
            That. The party leadership and the state were not communists for a long time, but already lived in communism. for themselves beautiful made Complete their separation from the primary party organizations and the main mass of the country's communists. The tops on their own lived in their transcendental .. lower classes of the party voted unanimously Do not understand this now - step on the same rake again and again
            1. badens1111
              badens1111 16 November 2017 11: 54 New
              +2
              Quote: To be or not to be
              Yeah. Tits

              And for the late CPSU there is no question of who was standing there at the top, it has long been clear, understand-traitors and shifters.
              But you, as it is strange to argue, since then there were these ... then it follows from you that everything remained so? A strange logic.
              That’s why the majority of the betrayers dug in different campuses from EP and its forerunner to the CP and LDPR, but you have no complaints about them. Why is that?
              Quote: To be or not to be
              The tops on their own lived in their transcendental .. lower classes of the party voted unanimously Do not understand this now - step on the same rake again and again

              So you don’t understand. It is only surprising why you don’t understand this.
              In this case, stubbornly peck the same Communist Party, but point blank you do not notice the barchuk in other parts, what is it with you, an order, a position or self-deception?
              1. To be or not to be
                To be or not to be 16 November 2017 12: 07 New
                0
                "At the same time stubbornly peck the same Communist Party, but point blank you do not notice the barchuk in other parts"
                And are we really talking about groups with a non-standard orientation ?? laughing
                Do not be offended .. bring the science of socialism to the masses. The future will soon follow ... With the digital economy ... "" the world has nothing to lose the edge of its chains "," but it will gain "..socialism. As a historical inevitability hi
      3. Varyag71
        Varyag71 16 November 2017 11: 07 New
        +2
        Quote: badens1111
        Let me inquire, but what have you done?

        Typically, such questions are asked by those who have done absolutely nothing on their own, and reproach others.
    2. rocket757
      rocket757 16 November 2017 10: 06 New
      +3
      The country, people who trusted the Communists is very ashamed of them ... that's for sure.
      And the aunt, who is not a losh ... (no need to offend animals !!!) the people themselves will "ride" ... ... at the same time and have fun!
      1. Rey_ka
        Rey_ka 16 November 2017 10: 49 New
        0
        People? A ride? I would not be so sure. Situevina in America, remember that all 1005 were hoping for Clinton, and it turned out like Mikhalych!
        1. rocket757
          rocket757 16 November 2017 11: 52 New
          +3
          Every might and our power, we not all openly love ... but what choice?
          The Yankees had a more interesting situation ... but most serious political scientists confidently said that only Sanders could make a competition. I remember it perfectly ... and after Bernie of the same party, in the impudent way, they drove !!! the voters who were supposed to be for Clinton just got angry and voted against her! Such a human reaction is normal .... at how about those who voted for the communists (against alkanaft) for the union !!! after well-known events, they are already voting against them, definitely. For example, I voted for the union and indirectly for commies, and now I will not for them under any sauce.
  3. Masya masya
    Masya masya 16 November 2017 10: 03 New
    +6
    Is it not a shame for yourself to run for such a company? Maybe he will remove the candidacy, so as not to burn with shame?
    1. Solomon Kane
      Solomon Kane 16 November 2017 10: 46 New
      +7
      Marina Vitalievna, my respect! hi love
      The choice has already been made. And clowns are needed for extras ...... laughing

      Uncle Vova is the commander ...
      1. Masya masya
        Masya masya 16 November 2017 10: 59 New
        +6
        Hello, Konstantin! love
        Quote: Solomon Kane
        clowns are needed for extras ....

        In this crowd only, God forgive me, there are not enough gays and there would be a complete set ... lol
      2. badens1111
        badens1111 16 November 2017 11: 03 New
        +5
        Quote: Solomon Kane
        Uncle Vova - Commander

        No problem.
        But then clowning with the elections, at the expense of all kinds of dog-Polonsky, why arrange?
        Putin needs carte blanche as a way to legitimize everything that has been tricked into the 90s, so the choice is for and for the sake of the country and its people or against the same.
        Let Putin win again, if only he understands that all the fuss in liberal bargains with corruption and other filth is tired of everyone in the country. And that the support in the country should not be on those who choose the WEST, but on those who choose RUSSIA .
        1. Solomon Kane
          Solomon Kane 16 November 2017 11: 14 New
          +5
          But then clowning with the elections, at the expense of all kinds of dog-Polonsky, why arrange?

          What do you mean why? The more characters - the more interesting the action, as in a theater ....
          And the more demons in the first act, the louder the applause the main character will break in the final of the production .....
          1. badens1111
            badens1111 16 November 2017 11: 24 New
            +2
            Quote: Solomon Kane
            And the more demons in the first act, the louder the applause the main character will break in the final of the production ....

            Well, yes .. what is there .. smear the fifth column?
            1. Solomon Kane
              Solomon Kane 16 November 2017 11: 32 New
              +3
              In this performance, "The Fifth Column" is represented by not the best cast ... negative can say - no ..
              1. badens1111
                badens1111 16 November 2017 11: 57 New
                +1
                Quote: Solomon Kane
                can say - no ..

                That is again a deception? For the sake of what?
      3. Stas157
        Stas157 16 November 2017 11: 30 New
        +3
        Quote: Solomon Kane
        The choice has already been made. And clowns are needed for extras ...... laughing

        Uncle Vova is the commander ...

        Compared to the Soviet, truly patriotic songs with which the country, all as one got up on the labor and military feat, this kind of scanty happened. Moody.
      4. Ivan Ivanov
        Ivan Ivanov 16 November 2017 11: 56 New
        0
        Quote: Solomon Kane
        The choice has already been made. And clowns are needed for extras ......


        why juggle a particular deputy slightly went too far, as reported in the news. with Uncle Vova and jargon bust but the message is correct.
    2. Stas157
      Stas157 16 November 2017 10: 50 New
      +5
      Quote: Masya Masya
      Is it not a shame for yourself to run for such a company? Maybe he will remove the candidacy, so as not to burn with shame?

      Oh, how funny! You tell Putin this! Have a good laugh together.
  4. Billgejtz
    Billgejtz 16 November 2017 10: 03 New
    +5
    about ksyushadi he is right
    1. Stas157
      Stas157 16 November 2017 10: 58 New
      +5
      Quote: BillGatez
      about ksyushadi he is right

      But the majority here seems to doubt it! They attacked the old Zyuganov, because how dare this blurt out towards Sobchak! How much annoyance people have! Zyuganov that, who deceived someone, robbed, threw? No? Personally, I can say this only towards the current government.
      1. turbris
        turbris 16 November 2017 17: 51 New
        +1
        No, he just rightly said about Sobchak, why so much irritation, but because he had done nothing else.
  5. The black
    The black 16 November 2017 10: 04 New
    +2
    One Madame from "House-2" as a "candidate for the call" begins to carry nonsense, I feel ashamed for the country,
    said the Communist leader at a press conference.
    Ah, the little rascal ... you see, he’s still looking at Madhouse-2 wassat
  6. san4es
    san4es 16 November 2017 10: 04 New
    +3
    One Madame from "House-2" as a "call candidate" begins to carry all sorts of nonsense, I am ashamed of the country

    ... Must be inserted at the Komsomol meeting soldier ... and also for non-payment of $$ - contributions
    1. Solomon Kane
      Solomon Kane 16 November 2017 11: 09 New
      +4
      She paid her dues - lay back ..... wink
  7. Humpty
    Humpty 16 November 2017 10: 06 New
    +3
    For Yavlinsky Gennady Andorevich not ashamed? . Compared with Yavlinsky, the biography of Ksyushadi seems more boring, in some ways even cleaner.
    1. The black
      The black 16 November 2017 10: 28 New
      +6
      Quote: Humpty
      compared with Yavlinsky, Ksyushadi’s biography seems more boring, in some ways even cleaner.

      Well, yes ... Grishka was selling his Motherland, and Ksyushka was his ..blood ... laughing
    2. Ivan Ivanov
      Ivan Ivanov 16 November 2017 11: 58 New
      0
      Grishka is still a politician for 30 years and Sobchak is a political circus
      1. Humpty
        Humpty 16 November 2017 15: 08 New
        0
        Quote: IvanIvanov
        Grishka is still a politician for 30 years and Sobchak is a political circus

        I do not want to repeat, read his biography. It will not be boring .
  8. Shurale
    Shurale 16 November 2017 10: 06 New
    +2
    But it’s a shame for me for Zyuganov that he took the money in the election !!! Bastard selling !!!
    1. Stas157
      Stas157 16 November 2017 11: 07 New
      +3
      Quote: Shurale
      But it’s a shame for me for Zyuganov that he took the money in the election !!! Bastard selling !!!

      It looks like you are the owner of exclusive information! Do not share this value, where did you get this? Friendship told you Zyuganov, or Putin?
      Under Yeltsin, when Zyuganov won the majority of votes, it is a well-known fact that there was a forgery of votes. That is, there was no need to buy anyone. And if Yeltsin bought Zyuganov, then why did he sue for unfair elections? Did not pay extra?
      Or do you think Putin paid him? Then what happens, he won the election and Putin? To whom he sold, you tell me.
    2. badens1111
      badens1111 16 November 2017 11: 10 New
      0
      Quote: Shurale
      It's a shame that he took his money in the election with money!

      Lies. You confused with Zhirinovsky. That's right ... took it. So far it’s working out.
      The more power depends on Zhirinovsky, the more property his party grows.

      Who doesn’t remember? Before voting on Chernomyrdin for the post of prime minister, V. Zhirinovsky declares in “Results” that “the LDPR will not give a single vote, it will vote against.” It votes - unanimously - for Chernomyrdin. Evil languages ​​in the Duma claimed that each pressed “for” the button cost the authorities no less than five thousand dollars. Evil tongues cannot be dealt with. Just like the incentives that allowed Zhirinovsky to either not accept the anti-people’s budget, then support it. Either ridicule Kirienko’s appointment, then change the faction’s position to the opposite Not many parties, it must be said, on the anniversary (they deserve it!) Were personally congratulated by President Yeltsin.

      Then they will be surprised where the politicians with the manners of the Führer got money for the elections. Http://www.compromat.ru/page_25572.htm
    3. Ivan Ivanov
      Ivan Ivanov 16 November 2017 11: 59 New
      0
      if you mean state security, then each party has it
    4. Rey_ka
      Rey_ka 16 November 2017 12: 28 New
      0
      better at this stage to understand the venality of a person than when he will be at the trough
  9. Runoway
    Runoway 16 November 2017 10: 09 New
    +2
    Yavlinsky, Zyuganov, Mironov ....... who is it? Condates for extras? What did they do, how did they prove themselves? Since the 90s, they have lost the elections, nobody needs them, why are they declared ??? Circus
  10. Alex66
    Alex66 16 November 2017 10: 10 New
    +1
    The Communists have a chance, but not with Zyuganov, who merged his victory, who agrees with anti-people’s laws, he doesn’t condemn them in words, and he has no business to surrender for the sake of stability. It’s a pity he doesn’t understand that it’s time to give way to the young.
    1. Stirbjorn
      Stirbjorn 16 November 2017 10: 33 New
      +1
      there is a chance if they unite with the PDS of the NDSR and nominate a common candidate from patriots - the same Boldyrev, or Grudinin ... because Zyuganov will go to the polls once again, the circus is worse than Sobchak
      1. badens1111
        badens1111 16 November 2017 17: 30 New
        +1
        Quote: Stirbjorn
        the same Boldyrev, or Grudinin

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pd-yy7AYcT4
    2. Ivan Ivanov
      Ivan Ivanov 16 November 2017 12: 00 New
      0
      What does it mean to agree? Does he have votes in the Duma to fight them?
  11. aszzz888
    aszzz888 16 November 2017 10: 12 New
    +1
    ... and here again they promoted "Madame from" House-2 "...
    The Yabloko party plans to run for election of Grigory Yavlinsky.

    ... but what about without Grigory ... bully
  12. Zhelezyakin
    Zhelezyakin 16 November 2017 10: 18 New
    +3
    Mr. Sue should also learn from Madame Prezhvalskaya, at least, self-PR!
  13. andrewkor
    andrewkor 16 November 2017 10: 18 New
    +2
    “Candidate on call” is strong! I came up with it myself or PR managers helped. We must remember. Almost as a “woman with low social responsibility”!
  14. Altona
    Altona 16 November 2017 10: 40 New
    +4
    I will stand up for Zyuganov. He’s an old man, so you can’t judge strictly, we will soon be the same. Regarding the Communist Party, the party needs to be reorganized. The party has a program, but a lot of the party is flirting with the church, flirting with the tsarist period of history and others kinds of flirting. The big drawback is the lack of a solid skeleton, the party is still the party of one person like the LDPR. I can list a lot. In general, the left must unite and clear its ranks. And consider changing course not only through elections. Lenin acted much more cunningly; he simply raised power from the land, where the tsar dropped it, and then the liberals. He dispensed with bourgeois elective little stuff-dryuchki. Lenin also took power on a wide front with the Left Socialist Revolutionaries, and in some places with the Anarchists, who were abundantly represented in the Soviets. No need to divide into sects and find out who is left and right.
    1. IS-80_RVGK2
      IS-80_RVGK2 16 November 2017 12: 26 New
      0
      Quote: Altona
      but a lot in the party

      And most importantly, the superfluous is its leader.
      Quote: Altona
      In general, the left must unite and clear its ranks.

      Do they even exist? Clowns running around with Soviet symbols, a cheguevara on a T-shirt and waving red flags are unlikely to be considered as such, because they have no intelligible thoughts in their heads, but one chaos and garbage.
      Quote: Altona
      Lenin acted much more cunningly, he simply raised power from the earth

      Actually, there was an armed seizure of power.
      Quote: Altona
      No need to divide into sects and find out who is left and right.

      But what about Lenin's - in order to unite, must one finally disengage oneself?
  15. Stalingradpobeda
    Stalingradpobeda 16 November 2017 10: 41 New
    0
    Only Vladimir Vladimirovich is a worthy candidate. Vote for Putin.
    1. Nasrat
      Nasrat 16 November 2017 10: 52 New
      +2
      Quote: Stalingradpobeda
      Only Vladimir Vladimirovich is a worthy candidate.

      It accidentally happened... bully
    2. Anatole Klim
      Anatole Klim 16 November 2017 11: 10 New
      +1
      Quote: Stalingradpobeda
      Only Vladimir Vladimirovich is a worthy candidate. Vote for Putin.

      Well, compared to other candidates allowed for the election, of course only he!
      1. Star
        Star 16 November 2017 11: 19 New
        +1
        Well, in the ballots without options, if only the first will be elected, otherwise it will win against everyone ....
  16. Star
    Star 16 November 2017 10: 46 New
    +1
    A law should be adopted on the deprivation of citizenship of people who consciously support directly or indirectly movements, laws, etc. aimed at undermining their own state.
  17. SCHWERIN
    SCHWERIN 16 November 2017 10: 53 New
    0
    And I am ashamed of you.
    Last year, the leader of the party, which has undeniable merits, repeats the same phrase: “We have a strong team” and hereinafter ... The leader during his speech at the PM PM plays Iphone!
    1. Ivan Ivanov
      Ivan Ivanov 16 November 2017 12: 02 New
      0
      with PR yes problems, the team can be updated. but the program of norms.
      1. SCHWERIN
        SCHWERIN 16 November 2017 17: 51 New
        0
        The program should be a real, without upheaval, class section. But no leader.
  18. Star
    Star 16 November 2017 11: 04 New
    +2
    Madame from "House 2" is not Madame, this is one of the leaders of the 5th .....
    "Ugolok" promised revenge and then the circus began.
    Goal
    1. To expand the foundations of society
    2. Hack our elections (you look at the "circus" and they will "win")
    3. provoke riots
    4. Overthrow the existing regime
    5. Enter your troops to ensure the security of our arsenal
    end.....
  19. The comment was deleted.
  20. Nemesis
    Nemesis 16 November 2017 11: 11 New
    +1
    Sobchak has no relation to Russia, let Ukraine be ashamed of her
  21. Seraphimamur
    Seraphimamur 16 November 2017 11: 21 New
    0
    Of all these, Putin remains the most adequate presidential candidate. Can someone offer another worthy candidate? Anal not to offer.
    1. Ivan Ivanov
      Ivan Ivanov 16 November 2017 12: 03 New
      +1
      let's see who the communists nominated
  22. Stegosaurus Brontosaurus
    Stegosaurus Brontosaurus 16 November 2017 11: 23 New
    0
    Quote: Ami du peupe
    ... Ksyushad is the most worthy opponent for him, and I won’t be surprised if she collects more votes than “Daddy Zyu”.

    And I will be surprised. I will be surprised at the number of people who want to see her as the supreme commander!
  23. sauvage
    sauvage 16 November 2017 11: 28 New
    +1
    made a circus from these choices
  24. weksha50
    weksha50 16 November 2017 11: 36 New
    0
    "One Madame from" House-2 "as "call candidate" begins to carry all nonsense, I am ashamed of becoming a country "....

    Hmm ... No worse than the late Zadornov turned out ... Godfather will not be offended by this? Although he had long had to unfasten his goddaughter on the ass and put in a corner ... So that we - for him and his goddaughter - would not be ashamed ... hi
    With all due respect to GDP, he too allowed his goddaughter to dissolve the language ...
  25. Ural resident
    Ural resident 16 November 2017 11: 43 New
    +1
    I wonder if Sobchak will collect a million signatures?
    It’s time to raise the threshold for presidential candidates.
    And then this is really an insult to the people - soon homeless people will be candidates for president, for fun.
  26. 1536
    1536 16 November 2017 12: 35 New
    0
    But in this so-called Communist Party are there leaders younger and more modern? If this party really expresses the interests of a large group of people who are ready to lead their party to victory in the elections, then you need to find a popular leader who speaks the way millions of citizens speak and think, from the age of 20 to 40-45 years. And this "comrade" teaches everyone what to do, from the height of his "superiority", making it clear that he certainly knows this, and the people have long been making fun of such "politicians" or sighing heavily, recalling Soviet times. It would be funny if it were not so sad. Reminds some training of football players of one team who carry out the installation of their coach.
  27. cedar
    cedar 16 November 2017 13: 27 New
    +1
    Ksenia was thrown to warm up the electorate wound up by the household. The middleweight wrestler also came to life and a voice came ...
    It all starts, as usual ... BUT, the Anglo-Saxons are driving a powerful wave against Russia and Putin, I hope, is preparing not only for the elections ...
  28. dvvv
    dvvv 16 November 2017 14: 13 New
    0
    the idea of ​​communism, or rather its social justice, has been sold for a long time and there is no sense from the Zyuganov party, therefore its participation is only extras. Yavlinsky ... this phenomenon must be prohibited by law ... If 3 times it was put forward and flew, then see from the field. Ksyushad is the same phenomenon only younger - ringing a lot of good zero. Probably decided to revive the show and in addition to sprinkled with flour and ashes invite new clowns and Ksyushad is very suitable for his show with his manners and reputation. And so, if you do not play in democracy, then on the terms of a pre-trial agreement to roll over Putin to positions and not spend money
  29. badens1111
    badens1111 16 November 2017 14: 29 New
    0
    Quote: Esoteric
    Socialism - it is real and tangible, capitalism - is and will be everything that his hand touches ... What kind of system is this - communism?

    Well, if you do not understand what it is then what are you talking about?
    They tell you about socialism, you are talking frank bullshit, about communism, for which no conditions have been created yet. But the history of the development of society does not stand still otherwise you would have lived in the slave-owning world of the darkest centuries ..
  30. Altona
    Altona 16 November 2017 15: 35 New
    +1
    Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
    And most importantly, the superfluous is its leader.

    ---------------------------------------
    Nevertheless, he has a party, but you do not.
    Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
    Do they even exist? Clowns running around with Soviet symbols, a cheguevara on a T-shirt and waving red flags are unlikely to be considered as such, because they have no intelligible thoughts in their heads, but one chaos and garbage.

    ------------------------------------
    You are a serious person and you don’t think of yourself as a clown. They have clear thoughts and they are formulated. If you cannot comprehend these thoughts yourself, then who is to blame for you?
    Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
    Actually, there was an armed seizure of power.

    ------------------------------------------
    He was armed because armed soldiers and sailors simply entered the Winter Palace and deposed the Provisional Government. By the way, the Provisional Government and Kerensky did not authorize and did not choose to represent Russia. And by the way, about the armed seizure of power. Did Yeltsin seize power in an unarmed way in October 1993 by shooting the Supreme Council building? You somehow relate events.
    Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
    But what about Lenin's - in order to unite, must one finally disengage oneself?

    ----------------------------------
    I wrote above that Lenin took power by uniting with the Left Social Revolutionaries, which were filled with the Soviets. The Soviets were a completely legitimate body, for they were elected by people. We have a source of power, people, according to the Constitution, if you are not in the know. And certainly not Vladimir Putin. You pulled out the phrase from the “Statement of the Iskra editorial board of 1900, which has nothing to do with the takeover of power in 1917. This is just about the left movement, in which there are only economic demands or direct criticism of Marxism, and it is about social Democrats. Now, there are quite a lot of people who share precisely Marxist and Leninist views.
  31. Greenwood
    Greenwood 16 November 2017 16: 51 New
    0
    It’s time for the Communist Party to nominate a new candidate, young and energetic. With Zyuganov, there’s no chance of even getting closer to Putin’s voices.
    1. Sergei75
      Sergei75 16 November 2017 17: 56 New
      +1
      Zyuganov, with his tip of the old sclerotics, who are afraid of young guys, because they can squeeze out their warm places, discredited all the ideas of the Communists and the case of V.I. Ulyanov (Lenin).
      He would change the name of the bastard party.
  32. Dedrusav
    Dedrusav 16 November 2017 18: 02 New
    0
    But what is it that Russia nominates gaers and degenerates as candidates? The country doesn’t wave a naked penis, so there is nothing to shame it.
  33. Chaos
    Chaos 16 November 2017 18: 08 New
    0
    Yavlinsky also climbs where they do not ask. Due to the difficult foreign policy situation around the Russian Federation, I propose to cancel the presidential election. GDP leave by the President for an indefinite period. At least another 5 years.
  34. nafanal
    nafanal 16 November 2017 18: 14 New
    +1
    Whose cow would mumble. s .. tsyknult butt in 96g. now sit exactly on w .. fifth point
  35. rruvim
    rruvim 16 November 2017 18: 20 New
    0
    May come to this December congress. And waving a party ticket to shout "No to Zyuganov!" All the same, they will not let me ... sad Tired of "scumbag."
  36. Dzafdet
    Dzafdet 16 November 2017 18: 55 New
    0
    Quote: Ami du peuple
    And I am ashamed of Zyuganov. The revisionist and compromiser who exchanged communist beliefs for buns from the government. In 1996, he had a chance, but the "eternal oppositionist" had missed this chance ... in general.
    So now Ksyushad is the most worthy opponent for him, and I won’t be surprised if she collects more votes than “daddy Zyu”.

    He was simply convinced that life is better than a lead pill in the head. And all the ballots were immediately destroyed. Democracy, however. Now the main democrat-bribe taker of nanotechnology is mastering ... drinks
  37. Whaler
    Whaler 17 November 2017 09: 28 New
    0
    Are you not ashamed of Voronenkov? !!! Here is H (uvachok) M (dreaming) O (to die) .... the communist is a capitalist ... pah, trash negative
  38. Div Divich
    Div Divich 17 November 2017 20: 54 New
    0
    Because of people like Zyuganov and Zhirinovsky, there is no one to vote for in the presidential election, Putin alone, there is no choice ...

    The old ones do not want to leave, but the new ones are not allowed.
    1. turbris
      turbris 18 November 2017 11: 26 New
      0
      Or maybe it is not necessary to let new ones in order to prevent a new revolution? The situation is complicated in the world, in the country, and it is better to be with an authoritative leader recognized in the country and the world than with a newcomer unknown to anyone.
      1. Div Divich
        Div Divich 18 November 2017 11: 44 New
        0
        Putin is not eternal, it is necessary to create a stable system of governing the country, and not to manage the country manually for one person.
        1. turbris
          turbris 18 November 2017 20: 32 New
          0
          I think he is already working on young cadres, the governors can see it, it will be interesting to look at the composition of the government after his election, who will be the prime minister and this is a possible successor.