Military Review

The Pentagon responded to Russia's proposal for joint strikes on the IG *

48
The coalition led by the United States does not conduct military operations against terrorists with third parties outside the coalition, a Pentagon spokesman said commenting on the Russian proposal for joint air strikes against the Islamic State * in Syria.


The Pentagon responded to Russia's proposal for joint strikes on the IG *


The coalition does not inflict airstrikes in Iraq or Syria based on requests from the Syrian regime or the Russian Federation. If we receive data or information from a third party that IG terrorists are present in our area of ​​responsibility, we can conduct our own investigation to confirm the truth of such data
- said the representative of the department.

If such information is deemed to be true, we will begin our own planning process (air strikes), regardless of third parties.
- He said, adding that such a process will be conducted taking into account the minimization of civilian losses for the population.

The Russian Ministry of Defense reported on Tuesday that the command of the Russian group of troops in Syria twice proposed to the US coalition joint action to destroy the columns of the terrorist group IG * on the eastern bank of the Euphrates.

The Russian military also said that the United States refused to inflict airstrikes on the forces of the terrorist group IG * leaving the Syrian Al-Bukemal, claiming that the militants fall under the Geneva Convention. According to the military, the US side was unable to respond to requests from the command of the Russian group in Syria about why the IG fighters * deploying in combat equipment and heavy weapons carried out in the area controlled by the international coalition to redeploy the Syrian troops in the Al- Bukemalya transmits RIA News


Islamic state * (IG *) is a terrorist organization banned in Russia
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
48 comments
Ad

The editorial board of Voenniy Obozreniye urgently needs a proofreader. Requirements: impeccable knowledge of the Russian language, diligence, discipline. Contact: [email protected]

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Kent0001
    Kent0001 15 November 2017 20: 44 New
    11
    Hollow bearded only they stick their nose out of the American zone.
    1. Going
      Going 15 November 2017 20: 48 New
      35
      It’s time to close this zone altogether and ask the United States to exit Syria.
      1. Pirogov
        Pirogov 15 November 2017 20: 56 New
        +8
        Quote: Going
        It’s time to close this zone altogether and ask the United States to exit Syria.

        It’s possible to ask, but will there be any sense?
        1. Going
          Going 15 November 2017 21: 00 New
          14
          Who said what to ask, I said close.
          1. Tatyana
            Tatyana 15 November 2017 21: 46 New
            10
            the American side was unable to respond to requests from the command of the Russian group in Syria about why IS * militants coming out on military equipment and heavy weapons are regrouping in a zone controlled by an international coalition to carry out new attacks on Syrian troops in the Al-Bukemal region,

            Because they are the main vampiric bastards!
            1. bouncyhunter
              bouncyhunter 15 November 2017 22: 11 New
              +7
              Tanya, good evening! hi love
              the American side was unable to respond to requests from the command of the Russian group in Syria

              I could not ??? Do not tell my sneakers - I DIDN’T WANT !!!
              The coalition does not strike in Iraq or Syria based on requests from the Syrian regime or the Russian Federation

              What evidence is needed after these words to support the barmalei mattresses ???
              1. Tatyana
                Tatyana 15 November 2017 22: 30 New
                +2
                Good evening Paul? drinks
                bouncyhunter
                What evidence is needed after these words to support the barmalei mattresses ???
                Yes, it’s just that the USA, together with ISIS, are fighting against all the peoples of the BV for their enslavement and their “biological” elimination as extra people for the Golden Billion!
                1. bouncyhunter
                  bouncyhunter 16 November 2017 10: 01 New
                  +1
                  Quote: Tatiana
                  Good evening Paul?

                  Well, yes, Pavel, did you expect to see Dormidont Yevlampievich? wink
                  Quote: Tatiana
                  Yes, it’s just that the USA, together with ISIS, are fighting against all the peoples of the BV for their enslavement and their “biological” elimination as extra people for the Golden Billion!

                  I emphasize that the mattress of the inhabitants of this region does not consider people at all. negative
              2. 79807420129
                79807420129 15 November 2017 22: 51 New
                +6
                Quote: bouncyhunter
                What evidence is needed after these words to support the barmalei mattresses ???

                And I, Pasha, think that they asked the stripes only out of politeness, before that they could have done without them, they only gritted their teeth with envy, but now even more so. drinks hi
                1. bouncyhunter
                  bouncyhunter 16 November 2017 10: 04 New
                  +1
                  Vlad! hi These striped animals both interfered and will interfere. But one horseradish will stick to victory. am
              3. The comment was deleted.
              4. Nyrobsky
                Nyrobsky 16 November 2017 00: 05 New
                +1
                Quote: bouncyhunter
                The coalition does not strike in Iraq or Syria based on requests from the Syrian regime or the Russian Federation
                What evidence is needed after these words to support the barmalei mattresses ???

                After this evidence, there is already no .... I think Pasha that after our documented and informational consolidated their proposals and the subsequent rejection, quite a real blow will be inflicted on the barmales.
                1. bouncyhunter
                  bouncyhunter 16 November 2017 10: 02 New
                  +1
                  Hello Dima ! hi I really hope that your words will be materially embodied. soldier
          2. Cutter
            Cutter 15 November 2017 23: 23 New
            +2
            Quote: Going
            Who said what to ask, I said close.

            Close .... !!!!! hi And if also on face .... am am Need to beat, and immediately in the face ... hi
        2. hrych
          hrych 15 November 2017 21: 01 New
          +4
          Quote: Pirogov
          It’s possible to ask, but will there be any sense?

          Well, the Tu22M3 blow was probably a blow - where you need a blow.
          The picture on icebreakers is almost out of the question because we have a polar front because we declared the underwater ridges of Lomonosov and Mendeleev our shelf ...
      2. Cutter
        Cutter 15 November 2017 23: 16 New
        +1
        that the United States refused to strike airstrikes on the forces of the IS * terrorist group leaving Syrian Al-Bukemal, claiming that the militants are subject to the Geneva Convention.

        It’s impossible, it’s impossible .... laughing Who beats his “friends”? Hooks ... negative angry
    2. Star
      Star 15 November 2017 20: 58 New
      11
      It's time to start hammering them throughout Syria. For us, there should not be any zones not agreed with the Syrian government. It is necessary to make clear to unsolicited guests with weapons in their hands. That soon, and "guests" will move into the category of terrorists with the ensuing consequences.
      And ISIS should not feel safe under my mother’s skirt.
    3. KCA
      KCA 15 November 2017 22: 04 New
      +2
      Yes, do not care for the zones, take the Syrian SU-22 into a box, and let them iron, and so we, the observation flight
    4. Tusv
      Tusv 15 November 2017 22: 10 New
      +2
      Quote: Kent0001
      Hollow bearded only they stick their nose out of the American zone.

      So, the Yankees should also be hollowed so that Viktorovich would be nodded into the phone, as in that joke:
      - Did you speak with your wife?
      “How did you guess?”
      - So you nodded half an hour into the phone
  2. poquello
    poquello 15 November 2017 20: 45 New
    +7
    good reason to reduce their area of ​​responsibility
  3. Angel_and_Demon
    Angel_and_Demon 15 November 2017 20: 48 New
    +8
    The coalition does not inflict airstrikes in Iraq or Syria based on requests from the Syrian regime or the Russian Federation. If we receive data or information from a third party that IG terrorists are present in our area of ​​responsibility, we can conduct our own investigation to confirm the truth of such data
    - said the representative of the department.
    If such information is deemed to be true, we will begin our own planning process (air strikes), regardless of third parties.
    and while we plan - they are already fading
    1. Smog
      Smog 15 November 2017 21: 09 New
      +2
      Quote: Angel_and_Demon
      while we plan - they are already fading

      So for this, they “plan” that they would fade.
      1. Angel_and_Demon
        Angel_and_Demon 15 November 2017 21: 10 New
        +7
        Quote: Smog
        So for this, they “plan” that they would fade.

        Here is the correct ideology of the USSR - without planning - nowhere laughing
  4. Rurikovich
    Rurikovich 15 November 2017 20: 50 New
    +4
    Oh you! Dare to point out a chosen country of God how to conduct its exceptional democratic ones for the benefit of peace and in defense of democracy of war bully After all, America has the exclusive right to do everything as America alone needs. For it is endowed with this right from above by the very viceroy of God on Earth, that is, the American president! fellow
    Ugh ... negative The country of frightened adyetau request
  5. Herculesic
    Herculesic 15 November 2017 20: 52 New
    +1
    It’s not for that that the Ishilov’s people are saved from recycling, so that we can destroy them together with the Yankees + Who will give offense to other people’s uncles wassat Here they will be taken out to the USA lol then the Russian Aerospace Forces can begin the operation "weed seedlings" - wassat the destruction of terrorists together with those who spread them around the world as a deadly virus.
    1. Reserve officer
      Reserve officer 15 November 2017 21: 23 New
      +2
      “The coalition does not strike in Iraq or Syria on the basis of requests from the Syrian regime or the Russian Federation .... we receive data or information from a third party ...."

      Something tells me that this is the third person - ISIS.
  6. pvv113
    pvv113 15 November 2017 20: 57 New
    +1
    US-led coalition does not conduct military operations against terrorists with third parties

    So that terrorists do not take offense
  7. Simon
    Simon 15 November 2017 21: 02 New
    +1
    The US will never bomb its geeks!
  8. kefan
    kefan 15 November 2017 21: 05 New
    +2
    They found someone to offer, this is probably such a delicate trolling from the MO.
  9. BMP-2
    BMP-2 15 November 2017 21: 07 New
    +2
    Well, well, if they are not satisfied with joint attacks on the IS, then perhaps a proposal for a joint attack on the Pentagon would be more attractive to them? wink lol
  10. Vlad5307
    Vlad5307 15 November 2017 21: 09 New
    +3
    The Russian Ministry of Defense reported on Tuesday that the command of the Russian group of troops in Syria twice proposed to the US coalition joint action to destroy the columns of the terrorist group IG * on the eastern bank of the Euphrates.

    So you just need to show / teach them again how to properly fight terrorism and destroy the bearded "children" throughout the territory of the ATS. And do not share it with the defenders of "democracy" into zones. Then the "partners" will have a real chance to leave the SAR with a "proudly raised head and a sense of accomplishment"! wassat
    1. Going
      Going 15 November 2017 21: 18 New
      +8
      Everything goes to this.
  11. Machete
    Machete 15 November 2017 21: 31 New
    +2
    Since when have terrorists come under the Geneva Convention?
    Is it that the state army and all the criteria are imposed on it, as to the usual any other army?
    1. olegyurjewitch
      olegyurjewitch 16 November 2017 21: 24 New
      0
      Quote: Machete
      Since when have terrorists come under the Geneva Convention

      This is according to the Americans. It is necessary to extinguish both those and others!
  12. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 15 November 2017 21: 32 New
    +2
    Get it without talking. As they say in Siberia - an honor would be offered, but God saved the loss ... And how to shake. And we will understand then.
  13. rruvim
    rruvim 15 November 2017 21: 32 New
    +2
    It turns out. that our command acts separately from international law. Why offer aggressors joint blows? Thus, to give legitimacy to the actions of the "coalition" led by the Americans on sovereign Syrian territory. Or our videoconferencing system does not contact diplomats at all, and even substitutes our allies from Iran, who do not officially fight and, therefore, do not recognize the participation of other countries in the civil war. Only the Russian government of the SAR allowed to participate in its defense. All other "interested" parties are only "incognito" in international law. It is wrong to offer amers to act together in the Syrian sky.
  14. Bazilevs81
    Bazilevs81 15 November 2017 21: 53 New
    +1
    So hollow yourself !!!!
    1. rruvim
      rruvim 15 November 2017 22: 02 New
      +1
      Exactly!!!
  15. The comment was deleted.
  16. Aimpoint
    Aimpoint 15 November 2017 22: 12 New
    0
    "The US-led coalition does not conduct military operations against terrorists with third parties outside the coalition."
    Well, as if everything is correct. If there was a Russian Federation in this coalition, I think no problems would arise. They have their own little world there
  17. keeper03
    keeper03 15 November 2017 22: 45 New
    +2
    Coalition of terrorists! Ugh on you! No.
    Ugh on you again! angry
  18. gari1234
    gari1234 16 November 2017 01: 30 New
    0
    In addition to public accusations, we can’t do anything, I think so far there is not enough political will.
  19. iouris
    iouris 16 November 2017 01: 40 New
    0
    What is Russia seeking from the Pentagon? I don’t understand anything.
    1. kartalovkolya
      kartalovkolya 16 November 2017 06: 29 New
      0
      And what is there to understand, because they offered cooperation, but they refused and you can "wash your hands", because now they are responsible for the consequences!
  20. tolmachiev51
    tolmachiev51 16 November 2017 05: 20 New
    +2
    The answer is worthy of amers- "we’re not fighting against our own !!!"
  21. Wolka
    Wolka 16 November 2017 05: 52 New
    +1
    It’s high time to turn off the “cooperation” shop with the Yankees and its Toshibilovskaya coalition, close the Syrian sky and wet nonhumans everywhere until there is not one left ...
  22. kartalovkolya
    kartalovkolya 16 November 2017 06: 27 New
    0
    Of course there is nothing new in the two-faced US policy, but I want to remind them of what one famous proverb says: “He who sowed the wind will reap the storm” and when the bearded are killed in Syria, it is not known where they will run, although it is already known that they will run and they are already running to the West, and I think the United States will not be deprived of their "attention and care"!
  23. Tarasios
    Tarasios 16 November 2017 06: 50 New
    0
    Officially refused? So that's good, actually. It will then be more difficult for Amer to cling to the results of the victory of the Syrian army and Russia. And, accordingly, fewer nishtyaks will get.
    Americans did not use the chance to legalize in the region at least to some extent. Paphos and self-confidence replace common sense ...
  24. Black water
    Black water 16 November 2017 07: 54 New
    0
    ".... the militants fall under the Geneva Convention.", I propose to introduce the term "Washington Convention" so that everything is clear immediately ...... and does the Geneva Convention really apply to terrorists? Are they the legally recognized side of the conflict? ... apparently somewhere in the Pentagon there is a door with the inscription IG and at the reception there is an office manager in the martyr's belt ...
  25. steelmaker
    steelmaker 16 November 2017 08: 37 New
    +1
    Our military surprised me. And that is to say the least. But have the bombs themselves already run out? Or is the Pentagon legal in Syria? They themselves need to be bombed together with ISIS. If the Syrians themselves are weak, let the Iranians deal with them.