Severodvinsk is preparing to launch the Prince Vladimir nuclear submarine

33
The first nuclear submarine missile carrier of the Borey-A project, Prince Vladimir, will be launched in Severodvinsk on November 17, said Igor Dygalo, a spokesman for the information and mass communications department of the Russian Defense Ministry for the Navy.

17 November 2017 of the year at the enterprise "PO SEVMASH" in Severodvinsk will be held the solemn ceremony of launching (withdrawing from the slipway) the head missile submarine cruiser of the strategic purpose of the project "Borey-A" "Prince Vladimir"
- said Dygalo.

Severodvinsk is preparing to launch the Prince Vladimir nuclear submarine


According to him, it is planned that the solemn ceremony will be attended by representatives of the main command of the Russian Navy, representatives of the administration of Arkhangelsk and Severodvinsk, the leadership of the United Shipbuilding Corporation, the Central Design Bureau of TsKB MT Rubin.

After the withdrawal of the nuclear submarine, the Prince Vladimir missile carrier will pass all the necessary stages of factory and state tests, which will be provided by the SEVMASH company’s crew and the crew of the submarine under the command of the captain 2 of the rank Vladislav Druzhin
- noted the representative of the Russian Navy.

Strategic missile submarine cruiser Knyaz Vladimir was designed by the Central Design Bureau for Marine Engineering Rubin and belongs to the fourth generation of nuclear submarines. The nuclear submarine missile-carriers of the Borey-A project have improved characteristics of a number of ship systems compared to their predecessors, submarine project "Borey".

Nuclear submarine cruisers of this project, after being incorporated into the Navy, in the near future will form the basis of naval strategic nuclear forces, reports RIA News

  • Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +23
    15 November 2017 14: 37
    "From here we dictate our will to the rest of the world community"

    Russia can afford colossal spending on weapons. On the nuclear submarine, the Tu-160 missile carriers, on updating nuclear weapons (these are billions and billions) and replacing poplars

    Hold the Olympics, APEC, build 8 nuclear power plants, a bridge to the Crimea and work out a project for a bridge to Sakhalin, the World Cup next year =]

    And then you go to the VO website and read snot from Romanians and Moldavians and local poor people about the fact that Russia is 2% of the global economy and that it’s better to arrange your country than to get into some kind of Syria.
    1. +3
      15 November 2017 14: 42
      it needs to be printed in 2 days as a fait accompli .... or else - you are ready to pawn ... it will be laid down - hurray laid down - work is underway - deadlines are shifted to the right - everything goes according to the schedule - it will be launched - and with a dozen more such news .... we are only interested in a fait accompli!
      1. +7
        15 November 2017 15: 39
        Read the "Made with us" website. There is just such a rule, and it is strictly adhered to.
        1. 0
          15 November 2017 15: 48
          Quote: Anton
          Read the "Made with us" website.

          it's my choice what when and where to read - write-reflect! .. is that clear?
    2. +1
      15 November 2017 18: 44
      And then you go to the VO website and read snot from Romanians and Moldavians and local poor people about the fact that Russia is 2% of the global economy and that it’s better to arrange your country than to get into some kind of Syria.

      being determines consciousness, have you heard? I've heard about the rogues from my friend, he complained that it means that it’s becoming more and more difficult to find successful types of clothes from 40 mowers in his new shop in the center of a God-saved country, can you give me addresses?
  2. +1
    15 November 2017 14: 47
    Quote: s-t Petrov
    what is better to deal with the arrangement of your country

    wassat fool from this begins any country - the goal of welfare !!!! ....
    1. +11
      15 November 2017 14: 50
      But in Libya, it was cool with this matter, huh?)

      What would you wish those Libyans who went to overthrow their king because they were given little (as they thought?)

      I would wish them what they have now.

      Do you think we have few such characters?) I personally contemplate every year changes in the country for the better, roads, bridges, interchanges and other infrastructure under construction.

    2. +15
      15 November 2017 14: 58
      The Yugoslavs lived in two-story stone mansions, drove expensive German cars, the horns came, they took everything, including the state, citizens lived even better in Libya, now they killed men and sell women and children like cattle. The most expensive thing in the world is safety, and well-being is not expressed in fashionable rags, expensive cars and gadgets that even the Chinese have learned to spank. I remember the moaning of the Serbs, they say Russia help, give a rocket, but late. For safety, we also need to destroy internal enemies like you, to start re-educating in uranium mines laughing
    3. +3
      15 November 2017 15: 59
      Quote: Burbon
      Quote: s-t Petrov
      what is better to deal with the arrangement of your country

      wassat fool from this begins any country - the goal of welfare !!!! ....

      Then blow in Monaco. There, the highest per capita GDP. But do not be offended if a gang of bandits who arrived in the same place, a couple of hundred in number, terrorizes everyone. It’s possible to the Pope’s Throne. To the Vatican. There is not even an army of its own, in the name of goodness. All in the name of welfare. A Swiss with a halberd is not a big burden on the budget.
      1. 0
        15 November 2017 16: 22
        Quote: Victor Dubovitsky
        Then blow in Monaco.

        uncle petya you .....?
        1. +3
          15 November 2017 16: 42
          Quote: Burbon
          Quote: Victor Dubovitsky
          Then blow in Monaco.

          uncle petya you .....?

          Yes, I'm not bourbon. And did not offer candy. Offered BUSINESS of all your life. Quickly fly to a place where there is a lot of food. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzFED8lhu6E
          1. +2
            15 November 2017 16: 59
            Quote: Victor Dubovitsky
            And did not offer candy. Offered BUSINESS

            immediately see the children of the country of TIPS !! ... advise your mother-in-law and wife ... is that clear? I wrote - that the welfare of the country is the most important thing in this country ... and if you are used to living in slums without amenities - your business, if you are used to the fact that doctors go to the patient in the taiga for 4 hours - the same is your business, if you are used to you need to study and be treated in Russia exclusively for money - this is all the more your business, if the exam is the pinnacle of knowledge testing - your business is the same, but thank God such people as you do not exceed 10 percent .... so off .... can not answer, I will not read nonsense.
            1. +4
              15 November 2017 17: 49
              Quote: Burbon
              Quote: Victor Dubovitsky
              And did not offer candy. Offered BUSINESS

              immediately see the children of the country of TIPS !! ... advise your mother-in-law and wife ... is that clear? I wrote - that the welfare of the country is the most important thing in this country ... and if you are used to living in slums without amenities - your business, if you are used to the fact that doctors go to the patient in the taiga for 4 hours - the same is your business, if you are used to you need to study and be treated in Russia exclusively for money - this is all the more your business, if the exam is the pinnacle of knowledge testing - your business is the same, but thank God such people as you do not exceed 10 percent .... so off .... can not answer, I will not read nonsense.

              Bring your ravings about pies and vinaigrette in the appropriate forum. On a female, usually peri-hemonic site.
      2. The comment was deleted.
  3. +3
    15 November 2017 14: 54
    This is good news, at least better than reinforcing the power of the Baltic Fleet with a boat with a machine gun and a window leaf for conducting aimed pistol fire at an enemy aircraft carrier! good
    A serious argument for the grin of the West!
    1. +5
      15 November 2017 16: 02
      Quote: raw174
      This is good news, at least better than reinforcing the power of the Baltic Fleet with a boat with a machine gun and a window leaf for conducting aimed pistol fire at an enemy aircraft carrier! good
      A serious argument for the grin of the West!

      For ocean open spaces - nuclear submarines. For near-Baltic hooligans - boat. And not vice versa. Everywhere everything should correspond.
  4. +3
    15 November 2017 17: 24
    If on Borey more or less everything is clear, then on Ashen, when is a clearance expected at the end of the tunnel? They promise to launch another Ash-tree in the water in 18, and when will they give the fleet to Kazan?
    1. +1
      15 November 2017 18: 35
      Quote: NEXUS
      and when will Kazan deliver it to the fleet?

      this is when Viktor Dubovitsky gives the go-ahead, and not like before ....
      1. +2
        15 November 2017 20: 05
        Quote: Burbon
        Quote: NEXUS
        and when will Kazan deliver it to the fleet?

        this is when Viktor Dubovitsky gives the go-ahead, and not like before ....

        Do not lean out without a report. Or didn’t you read the charter?
    2. +3
      15 November 2017 18: 48
      According to the plan, Kazan is promised to be operational at the end of 2018, at the same time the descent of Novosibirsk. But plans for new weapons are always being adjusted.
      1. +2
        15 November 2017 20: 10
        Quote: Veteran
        According to the plan, Kazan is promised to be operational at the end of 2018, at the same time the descent of Novosibirsk. But plans for new weapons are always being adjusted.

        Adjustment of plans is no longer considered a state crime. The Beria regime in the past also disfigured the concept of PLAN. The punishment for the stupidly prescribed positions of the plan gave rise to universal deception, home registry and concealment of opportunities. As a result, they received a complete loss of economic and production management. The plan is not a dogma, but guidelines and a list of works for allies.
        Failed execution is 80% stupid planning, not bad work. It would be bad to work, not to ruin the Aral Sea. Nobody succeeded, but we managed.
        1. +3
          15 November 2017 22: 05
          Correction of plans for commissioning ships to the right in terms of time should have reasonable limits, in this case, according to "Prince Vladimir", it still does not go beyond this (planned for August, will be lowered in November). But one cannot consider normal proofreading by terms of readiness, for example, BDK, etc. 1171, or other ships provided with supplies of main engines, is this “silly planning”? Biased and strange explanation.
          1. +1
            16 November 2017 00: 30
            Quote: Veteran
            Correction of plans for commissioning ships to the right in terms of time should have reasonable limits, in this case, according to "Prince Vladimir", it still does not go beyond this (planned for August, will be lowered in November). But one cannot consider normal proofreading by terms of readiness, for example, BDK, etc. 1171, or other ships provided with supplies of main engines, is this “silly planning”? Biased and strange explanation.

            If you keep in mind how MUCH and WHAT departments, factories, and even COUNTRIES are involved in the construction of such expensive pieces of iron, it will become clear that annual disruptions are now almost a system. The collapse of the conveyor called the industry of the USSR, when everything was subordinated to a single plan and the system of punishment, supply, set up for decades, was working poorly, and now it all collapsed to hell. I was a leading designer of products going to these ships .. Plant in the depths of Siberian ores. At the Ministry of Coal Industry of the USSR. At the "Arctic" (the one still in 1968), we made more than 2 thousand of these products. Weakness. And not only to the Arctic. The entire submarine and surface fleet used our products. The plant is alive, once looked at his site. Make these boxes. But with what difficulties? From the factory there was a fence and some workshops. The tool shop now sells foreign electrical equipment. And how to renew molds, stamps, etc. to do as before 30 thousand a year is all this? How many such industries simply disappeared?
            1. +3
              16 November 2017 14: 27
              [quote] If you keep in mind, HOW MANY and WHAT departments, factories, and even COUNTRIES are involved in the construction of such expensive glands, it will become clear that annual disruptions are now almost a system. / quote]
              Yes, I know, in 1970 I myself took part in the acceptance of a submarine-new building in terms of RES and communications. But the multiplicity of manufacturers involved in the creation of the ship is characteristic of all countries that are engaged in shipbuilding. and they don’t have a system of annual breakdowns.
              [quote] The collapse of the conveyor called industry ... / quote]
              [quote] now all this collapsed to hell / quote]
              This, probably, is the main reasons for the failure to fulfill plans, and not their "stupidity". The old system of cooperation has been destroyed, but the new one has not been created. Manufacturers hire subcontractors - “dark horses”, who either disrupt the order, or disappear, or drive “counterfeit”.
              In addition, the USC’s financial appetites are constantly growing, Rakhmanov has already stated that the USC has a financing gap in the fifth building (“Prince Oleg”), and this may delay the time it will be launched.
              1. The comment was deleted.
              2. 0
                16 November 2017 15: 10
                [quote = Veteran] [quote] If you keep in touch, HOW MANY and WHAT departments, factories, and even COUNTRIES are involved in the construction of such expensive glands, it will become clear that annual breakdowns are now almost a system. / quote]
                Yes, I know, in 1970 I myself took part in the acceptance of a submarine-new building in terms of RES and communications. But the multiplicity of manufacturers involved in the creation of the ship is characteristic of all countries that are engaged in shipbuilding. and they don’t have a system of annual breakdowns.
                [quote] The collapse of the conveyor called industry ... / quote]
                [quote] now all this collapsed to hell / quote]
                This, probably, is the main reasons for the failure to fulfill plans, and not their "stupidity". The old system of cooperation has been destroyed, but the new one has not been created. Manufacturers hire subcontractors - “dark horses”, who either disrupt the order, or disappear, or drive “counterfeit”.
                In addition, the USC’s financial appetites are constantly growing, Rakhmanov has already stated that the USC has a financing gap in the fifth building (“Prince Oleg”), and this may delay the time it will be launched. [/ Quote]
                What is the country that you meant, accepting the ship on time, according to plan, and not falling apart at that time into 15 parts - republics, plus, from which another 9 republics participating at that time did not fall off, each in its volume in the construction of this ship .
                You vain compare Norway with Russia. Compare Poland with Norway. Get that Gdansk died completely and irrevocably, approximately like Mariupol, Nikolaev, other plants and shipyards of the USSR.
                And yet, stupid plans. They must take into account not the desired, but the real. Plans based on the desire to please the management are waiting for just such a fate.
                1. +3
                  16 November 2017 18: 22
                  2000 years have passed since the 17 of the year, and we have the shipbuilding "things are still there." See how China's shipbuilding has developed over this time. In 2001, its share in the global ship market was estimated at only 6%, South Korea at that time 34%, and Japan - 32%. But already in the first 10 anniversary of the century, the quantitative gap was overcome; in 2009, the share of China in the reg. tonnage of constructed ships amounted to 28,6%, losing only to South Korea, and this despite the impact of the global financial crisis. In 2010, China bypassed South Korea in terms of the tonnage of ordered vessels.
                  And China began with the creation of many joint ventures that produced separate system units for ships - from engines and navigation aids to items of equipment for crew accommodation. In 1999, the General State Company of the CSP of China, which combined all the core production, including repairs, was reorganized. In the process of corporatization, two large vertically integrated structures were created: Kit. state Shipbuilding Corporation (KGSK) and Keith. Shipbuilding Industrial Corporation (KSPK). The industry has received a concessional lending regime. The conditions for granting loans to Chinese shipowners for the purchase of KGSK and KSPK products include installment payments of 80% of value for 8,5 years at 5,1% per annum for insurance of 12% of the amount. To support KGSK and KSPK to receive orders in related industries within China and abroad, these corporations are annually allocated funds for marketing and consulting activities. Shipbuilding companies are exempt from paying 3% land tax allocated to local budgets. Since 2000, when industry support was first laid down in the 5-year development plan, production volumes have grown almost 17 times. As state aid measures, subsidies were provided for loans, leasing operations, insurance and other traditional steps that are in the arsenal of any government. As a result, the number of shipyards exceeded 3 thousands.
                  As for the “stupid plans”, in our case it is more relevant for USC enterprises that are ready to declare their readiness to “build everything and in the shortest planned time”, not paying attention to the lack of normal subcontractors, which they “grab on the go after receiving the order” ”, And the adventures begin with supplies, their time and quality.
                  1. 0
                    16 November 2017 21: 24
                    Quote: Veteran
                    2000 years have passed since the 17 of the year, and we have the shipbuilding "things are still there." See how China's shipbuilding has developed over this time. In 2001, its share in the global ship market was estimated at only 6%, South Korea at that time 34%, and Japan - 32%. But already in the first 10 anniversary of the century, the quantitative gap was overcome; in 2009, the share of China in the reg. tonnage of constructed ships amounted to 28,6%, losing only to South Korea, and this despite the impact of the global financial crisis. In 2010, China bypassed South Korea in terms of the tonnage of ordered vessels.
                    And China began with the creation of many joint ventures that produced separate system units for ships - from engines and navigation aids to items of equipment for crew accommodation. In 1999, the General State Company of the CSP of China, which combined all the core production, including repairs, was reorganized. In the process of corporatization, two large vertically integrated structures were created: Kit. state Shipbuilding Corporation (KGSK) and Keith. Shipbuilding Industrial Corporation (KSPK). The industry has received a concessional lending regime. The conditions for granting loans to Chinese shipowners for the purchase of KGSK and KSPK products include installment payments of 80% of value for 8,5 years at 5,1% per annum for insurance of 12% of the amount. To support KGSK and KSPK to receive orders in related industries within China and abroad, these corporations are annually allocated funds for marketing and consulting activities. Shipbuilding companies are exempt from paying 3% land tax allocated to local budgets. Since 2000, when industry support was first laid down in the 5-year development plan, production volumes have grown almost 17 times. As state aid measures, subsidies were provided for loans, leasing operations, insurance and other traditional steps that are in the arsenal of any government. As a result, the number of shipyards exceeded 3 thousands.
                    As for the “stupid plans”, in our case it is more relevant for USC enterprises that are ready to declare their readiness to “build everything and in the shortest planned time”, not paying attention to the lack of normal subcontractors, which they “grab on the go after receiving the order” ”, And the adventures begin with supplies, their time and quality.

                    Time can be measured for centuries. But we are trying to measure not time, but BUSINESS. How many were built over the years? Still living, the auto industry is a brake on the birth of a new, modern, successful. Dare to eliminate what has not yet been destroyed? The private trader has not been given anything that makes a profit. The railway is state, non-oil, gas industry, energy. the most important engineering industries are either state-owned or given to a small extent, without a casting vote in joint-stock companies. Something I do not remember the case when Carter, Reagan and others set prices for their goods. We are involved in everything the state. But it should not be involved in business. It should make parties to disputing subjects, leading the parties to the law. Soviet technology, backward, costly in favor. Consuming 5 times more energy and 10 times more raw materials than the damned capitalist. Hence, expensive, not high-quality and uncompetitive. China is now not communist. There the means of production are private. Hence the results. From the PDA there was one sticker left. Why are we all the owner, if he lives well without us. Make friends with the mayor and break off the treasure of the past.
                    In 2000, my factory was bought for 59 thousand rubles. For the price of a one-bedroom apartment in Penza. Now it is the basis of the Cherkizovsky bird association. Why will they notice ME? That's when there will be NOTHING TO TAKE FROM THE COMMUNITY (BUDGET), then ....
                    1. +3
                      16 November 2017 21: 56
                      You wanted an example of success in the development of shipbuilding over the past one and a half decades - I brought it, and at the same time did not agitate at all for the Soviet system of organization of production, which really does not exist in China. This is an example of CASE. And we don’t have centuries in stock, and therefore a radical revision of the concept of organizing the work of industry and the creation of new industries is required.
                      1. 0
                        16 November 2017 22: 31
                        Quote: Veteran
                        You wanted an example of success in the development of shipbuilding over the past one and a half decades - I brought it, and at the same time did not agitate at all for the Soviet system of organization of production, which really does not exist in China. This is an example of CASE. And we don’t have centuries in stock, and therefore a radical revision of the concept of organizing the work of industry and the creation of new industries is required.

                        Privatization gave not profitable firms to private hands. The scope of service. Trade. Do you notice any success there? Did the seller FIRST say hello to you in the USSR? Are you dumped on the counter for your choice of fifty jeans at once? This is the result of work for our own interest, when the report is not for the number of customers served, but for money. Femer does not report for overfulfillment in terms of plowing, the water utility does not report for drainage of swamps, flooding of deserts ....
                        I’m thinking that if the state leaves industry, then the results will be in three to five years. But one question is, can we all withstand that the October Revolution brought about an ever-widening stratification, when the rich are even richer and the poor are even poorer? Wait until the MIDDLE class grows, which is a stabilizer in ANY COUNTRY? It is to the average businessman that unemployed schwonders who want to select and share, and multimillionaires who can ruin anyone through dumping, are equally dangerous. The middle class, which is the majority in the state, ruling and setting laws, taxes, antitrust and other legislation, a steeply rising tax scale, which forces the rich to pay for the poor .... Can we survive FULL PRIVATIZATION without Maidan? Answer this question for yourself. And everyone else will become unnecessary.
  5. +1
    15 November 2017 18: 40
    ... and gasoline went up again ... And in 2018. not expensive yet sickly ...
    1. +1
      15 November 2017 22: 25
      in the army breech. it's in
  6. 0
    15 November 2017 19: 43
    It's time, promised in August to do it.
  7. +2
    15 November 2017 22: 07
    Kiev will finally be able to be proud of naval power - they sincerely consider Prince Vladimir the great Ukrainian (!!!) prince.
  8. +3
    17 November 2017 00: 32
    Victor Dubovitsky,
    I do not need to answer your question. In addition, I did not ask questions, and there is nothing to fall off.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"