Minsk ready to send Belarusian peacekeepers to Donbass

32
The Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Belarus, Vladimir Makei, speaking at a joint press conference with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, commented on the journalists' question about the possibility of the participation of Belarusian military personnel in the international peacekeeping mission in the Donbas. According to the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Belarus, Belarus does not exclude the participation of its troops in the UN peacekeeping mission in the Donbass.

Makey's statement is a Ukrainian agency. UNIAN:
If necessary, we are ready to allocate the appropriate peacekeeping contingent, if it is acceptable to all interested parties, in order to participate in solving peacekeeping tasks. The President of Belarus, Alexander Lukashenko, still in 2014, spoke about the readiness to send Belarusian peacekeepers to the Donbass.




Minsk ready to send Belarusian peacekeepers to Donbass


Recall that earlier there was a meeting of the special representatives of the Russian Federation and the United States in Ukraine. Vladislav Surkov and Kurt Volker discussed the deployment of peacekeepers in the Donbas. The main differences between Russia and the United States are that Russia supports the idea of ​​introducing peacekeepers along the line of contact between the belligerents - that is, where they are shooting. The US and Kiev are demanding the introduction of peacekeepers on the border of Donbass with Russia. This position of Kiev and Washington is puzzling for one simple reason: peacekeepers in the case of dozens of conflicts were introduced exactly where the fighting took place.
  • http://www.mil.by
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    15 November 2017 14: 32
    good offer! simple and logical.
    1. +4
      15 November 2017 14: 40
      Quote: Black Water
      good offer!

      The proposal is good, but Kiev will be categorically against it, since the Republic of Belarus is a member of the Collective Security Treaty Organization, and, according to the Ukrainian authorities, Belarusian peacekeepers cannot be a priori neutral.
      By the way, today the vice-speaker of the Verkhovna Rada Gerashchenko said
      I regard this vote of the Belarusian delegation in the third UN resolution committee on the Crimea as an act that runs counter to flashy statements about neutrality. This is the second knife in the back of Ukraine after the same last year’s vote

      1. +1
        15 November 2017 14: 44
        . This is the second knife in the back of Ukraine after the same last year’s vote

        Somewhere we already heard about "knives in the back." When will the ASU come up with something of its own?
        1. +3
          15 November 2017 14: 56
          this is not a knife in the back, this is a threat to a member in ... a chocolate stain heather
        2. +2
          15 November 2017 15: 00
          Averchenko wrote about “A Dozen Knives in the Back of the Revolution” ... So, you see, they’ll throw it over.
      2. 0
        15 November 2017 15: 43
        Quote: Ami du peuple
        Deputy Speaker of the Verkhovna Rada Gerashchenko said

        Forever lying Gerashchenko can now only indistinctly mumble, blow his nose and give out any nonsense.
        It is said that it’s done, and there will be no amers in the Donbass.
    2. +1
      15 November 2017 15: 06
      Good
      This means: the interests of the Russian world - separately from Belarus. Why aren't the "brothers"?
      1. +1
        15 November 2017 15: 44
        Quote: Victor N
        It means:

        What kind of stupidity did you freeze? Do you prefer American, NATO peacekeepers ??
        1. 0
          15 November 2017 17: 27
          Better Russian. On the Russian-Polish border near Lublin.
  2. +4
    15 November 2017 14: 38
    send Belarusian peacekeepers to Donbass

    Why not? Do not introduce the same NATO bulldogs
    1. +9
      15 November 2017 14: 41
      there are more Chinese or Indians suitable, in extreme cases, South Africa))
    2. +10
      15 November 2017 14: 42
      If necessary, we are ready to allocate the appropriate peacekeeping contingent

      After these words Makei can safely expect that our Opps will hold another rally against the sending of Belarusian peacekeepers. And I also think:
      Quote: pvv113
      Why not? Do not introduce the same NATO bulldogs

      soldier
      1. +1
        15 November 2017 15: 21
        Opps will hold another rally against the sending of Belarusian peacekeepers

        But what without them?
      2. +1
        15 November 2017 15: 46
        Quote: Jedi
        After these words Makei can safely expect that our Opps will hold another rally against the sending of Belarusian peacekeepers

        Yes, you beat this pathetic bunch of grant-eaters on them, let them calm them down, especially violent people will sit in the KGB basement rooms and that’s all.
        And so, well, who else but brothers will help)))
        1. +5
          15 November 2017 15: 49
          Quote: badens1111
          Yes, you beat this pathetic bunch of grant-eaters on them, let them calm them down, especially violent people will sit in the KGB basement rooms and that’s all.

          So, besides the security forces, nobody has been paying attention to them for a long time, now they are out of resentment and lack of attention and organize actions with or without. lol
  3. +6
    15 November 2017 14: 39
    not, not that, in this situation serious provocations are practically guaranteed.
    1. +2
      15 November 2017 14: 55
      Quote: Warrior with a machine gun
      not, not that, in this situation serious provocations are practically guaranteed.

      Yes, besides its chiefs from NATO, the junta does not recognize anyone as peacekeepers. Against the rest, provocations will be applied, such as fired upon by the Separs.
  4. +1
    15 November 2017 15: 12
    Quote: Piramidon
    Quote: Warrior with a machine gun
    not, not that, in this situation serious provocations are practically guaranteed.

    Yes, besides its chiefs from NATO, the junta does not recognize anyone as peacekeepers. Against the rest, provocations will be applied, such as fired upon by the Separs.

    .... let the peacekeepers shoot in response to the defeat during the shelling ... it will be easier to later determine the origin of the shooters .... the peacekeepers have a problem in that they are constantly waiting for a stab in the back and provocations. they are preparing for this ........ and let's launch the Turks, they are in NATO and they have 7 Fridays a week, we can expect everything from them))). I think that silence will come on the demarcation line)))) while the Ukrainian side will ask the United States "... what to do?"
  5. +2
    15 November 2017 15: 23
    Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Belarus Vladimir Makei, speaking at a joint press conference ...

    Some surname is suspicious ... wassat Captive American pilot is not his relative an hour?
    1. +1
      15 November 2017 15: 29
      this is his cousin smile
      1. 0
        15 November 2017 17: 28
        And a sexual partner.
    2. +1
      15 November 2017 17: 30
      Vladimir Makei is one of the main Euro-Atlanticists and Russophobes in the Lukashenko team. And it’s not very masked.
  6. 0
    15 November 2017 15: 52
    I wish we heard the rest from the CSTO!
  7. 0
    15 November 2017 15: 58
    Quote: Black Water
    good offer! simple and logical.

    But for now these are just words! Will input be made? Question...
    -30 today, in Norilsk, but it doesn’t scare me! Simple and logical? But these are also just words - I spent all day at home ... Well, not at work ...
  8. 0
    15 November 2017 15: 59
    Quote: Nikolai Fedorov
    Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Belarus Vladimir Makei, speaking at a joint press conference ...

    Some surname is suspicious ... wassat Captive American pilot is not his relative an hour?

    Hahaha, they’ve killed! Right, damn it!
  9. 0
    15 November 2017 16: 01
    Quote: den3080
    this is not a knife in the back, this is a threat to a member in ... a chocolate stain heather

    Did Antonina do something good? Why are you offering her a bonus?
  10. 0
    15 November 2017 16: 03
    Quote: Piramidon
    Quote: Warrior with a machine gun
    not, not that, in this situation serious provocations are practically guaranteed.

    Yes, besides its chiefs from NATO, the junta does not recognize anyone as peacekeepers. Against the rest, provocations will be applied, such as fired upon by the Separs.

    The militias will leave for the peacekeepers, so the provocation will be difficult to carry out ...
  11. 0
    15 November 2017 16: 19
    Another big question is who benefits from the proposal of the Belarusians: New Russia or the Kiev regime.
  12. +1
    15 November 2017 16: 35
    Minsk ready to send Belarusian peacekeepers to Donbass
    ... to the border with us? wassat
    1. +1
      15 November 2017 17: 31
      Exactly. And you thought Lukashenko will protect Donbass from his ever-godsend godfather?
  13. 0
    16 November 2017 02: 17
    From the LPR and the DNI do not shell Kiev. Peacekeepers from Belarus should be introduced to Kiev. And close the border for the supply of "non-lethal" and "lethal" weapons, cookies and other joys.
  14. +3
    16 November 2017 03: 40
    Thank you ... Your red-and-white can only be sent to Kalyma, under the escort of the Federal Penitentiary Service of the Russian Federation ... Red-and-white are the same Bandera ... And Lukashenko is not an ally of Russia ... The Crimea film is prohibited in Belarus ... The St. George ribbon is prohibited , instead of it, a ribbon of colors of the flag of Belarus, with a flower of an apple tree ... I didn’t recognize Crimea as part of Russia ... It supplies fuel and lubricants for Ukraine to the ATO and participates in joint development of new types of weapons with Ukraine, in particular new ATGMs ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"