Syrian Foreign Ministry: the presence of US troops in the country violates the foundations of the UN

58
The Syrian Foreign Ministry called aggression any foreign military presence in the country without the consent of the government, reports RIA News.



In Damascus, stressed that this applies to American troops.

It is (...) a violation of the sovereignty of Syria and a flagrant violation of the foundations of the UN,
the statement said MFA.

The agency demanded that Washington immediately withdraw the military from the country. Diplomats also noted that the actions of the United States threaten the security of the republic, so it reserves the right to "appropriate reaction".

Earlier, the head of the Pentagon, James Mattis, said that the UN actually allowed the United States to fight the militants in Syria, because it had adopted resolutions against the IG group (banned in the Russian Federation). He also said that the Pentagon does not plan to withdraw its units before a diplomatic resolution of the situation in the country.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov noted in turn that Mattis’s statements contradict the Geneva accords, as well as US assurances that their only goal in Syria is to fight terrorism.
58 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    15 November 2017 10: 02
    US presence at the UN violates all human principles and morality ..
    1. +9
      15 November 2017 10: 13
      The presence of the United States on the political map of the world violates all that is possible ... laughing
      1. +9
        15 November 2017 10: 18
        "Exceptional" raised the question of their exclusion from the list of states of planet Earth.
        1. +6
          15 November 2017 10: 52
          Quote: Going
          Exceptional "raised the question of their exclusion from the list of states of planet Earth.

          Pentagon chief James Mattis said that the UN actually allowed the United States to fight the militants in Syria ...... .... He also said that the Pentagon has no plans to withdraw its units before a diplomatic settlement of the situation in the country.
          How much can you listen to this nonsense? What a de-regulation, when they themselves are yelling that Assad is overthrown. It is clear to the latest homeless person from Burundi what the Americans are doing there. The United States will understand that there is nothing to do there when the losses shout about it. So, that only by crowding out, they themselves will not leave, even though here the galactic UN will prescribe them ...
  2. +13
    15 November 2017 10: 02
    You cannot drive the United States out of Syria. negative
    1. +6
      15 November 2017 10: 07
      And the UN, too .. Yes hi
      Quote: Jedi
      You cannot drive the United States out of Syria. negative
      1. +12
        15 November 2017 10: 09
        hi UNanists can only shake the air with words, but they are not able to really upset the United States. Yes
        1. +5
          15 November 2017 11: 22
          Quote: Jedi
          UNanists only shake the air with words

          as in the old song - "he is a pianist and teacher" laughing
          Welcome hi
          1. +5
            15 November 2017 11: 27
            Vitaliy, hi! hi You and I have already discussed the topic of polite expressions. wink
      2. +3
        15 November 2017 10: 17
        From the UN nowadays you can’t blind even a scarecrow wink
    2. +3
      15 November 2017 10: 16
      Hi, Max! Only by force
      1. +7
        15 November 2017 10: 18
        Volodya, hello! hi The United States is imposing its will on everyone by force, for so long it has not been a sin to them to taste the same dish. wink
        1. +1
          15 November 2017 10: 20
          This will upset them very much, the states do not understand such an attitude towards their loved ones wink
          1. +5
            15 November 2017 10: 28
            They understand, only the language of power and understand. They do not accept, but understand. angry
            1. +1
              15 November 2017 10: 44
              The language of power is yes, understand. But the attitude towards oneself is built on the principle of “what for us?”
              1. +6
                15 November 2017 10: 46
                Like all gopniks, when he flies into a portrait. Yes
                1. +3
                  15 November 2017 11: 04
                  Comparison of the USA with the gopniks is very accurate!
                  1. +6
                    15 November 2017 11: 12
                    And with whom else to compare them? Not with plush bunnies, then? By Senka and a hat.
                    1. +1
                      15 November 2017 11: 15
                      It's a shame for the "partners" lol
                      1. +5
                        15 November 2017 11: 18
                        And to me (that's strange wink ) - no.
        2. +4
          15 November 2017 10: 39
          It’s impossible, they came for peaceful purposes! This is politically incorrect, intolerant and, at least, VOLUNTARISM! laughing
          1. +7
            15 November 2017 10: 44
            Quote: kaban7
            Voluntarism!

            But but but! "Not to be expressed in my house!" lol
  3. +3
    15 November 2017 10: 06
    The UN has long been a toy in the hands of the United States. Yes, and not only the UN ...
  4. +7
    15 November 2017 10: 08
    The United States has long behaved like Hitler, climb wherever they want and no one decree to them. Mattis in this case is very reminiscent of Guderian.
    1. +7
      15 November 2017 10: 19
      Quote: Altona
      The United States has long behaved like Hitler, climb wherever they want and no one decree to them. Mattis in this case is very reminiscent of Guderian.


      Indeed, and not just a haircut.
  5. 0
    15 November 2017 10: 19
    Duc right strong. The question is, figs are talking about UN membership ...
    1. +1
      15 November 2017 11: 59
      Quote: Krasnodar
      Duc right strong. The question is, figs are talking about UN membership ...
      Who is very poor here .... wassat A country of level “B”, for the money and wants to become party “A” ?! wassat
      1. 0
        16 November 2017 03: 42
        Who feeds and dresses a girl, she dances!
  6. +3
    15 November 2017 10: 24
    This is not the first statement by the Syrian government, which aims not only to defeat terrorism, but also to return the dictatorial regime of tyrant Assad back.

    Civil war, do not forget about it. It began before the terrorists entered Syria, using it to weaken the civil war.
    Syria will now be divided and Assad is trying pathetic attempts to regain all of Syria. The country that he received not by right, like his father is a dictator. A country in which people had no right to express their opinion, nor the right to justice or normal life.

    The United States has a VETO in the UN Security Council and therefore, as the United States defended the opposition, they will. Just as Russia uses its veto to defend itself and Assad in the UN Security Council, the United States will act in the same way.
    Everyone here writes that the UN is subordinate to the United States, but they forget that Russia makes excellent use of the leverage in the UN Security Council to protect itself and does this with marked constancy, and the so-called UN submission to the United States, the United States does not help.


    Therefore, the miserable cries of the Syrian Foreign Ministry at the UN do not bother anyone. The dog barks - the caravan goes on.

    Although I completely agree that the UN should cease to exist, as it only creates problems and cannot solve them.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. +3
        15 November 2017 10: 45
        Perhaps the United States has the legal right to obtain Syria? And who else, because the USA is a stronghold of legality in the world, according to the law, everything in the world belongs to them, as well as the right to spit on all international rights and interfere in the internal affairs of other countries.
        1. +1
          15 November 2017 11: 44
          Quote: kaban7
          Perhaps the United States has the legal right to obtain Syria?


          No.
          The United States allows Syrian citizens to make the choice that Assad’s father has deprived of for decades, whose cause Assad himself continued to destroy the right of people to live in normal conditions.

          Of course, the United States will have something to do with it.
          Just like Russia and Iran will have from Assad. I think there are adequate people here who understand that Russia is protecting Assad not because of humanity, not to protect the poor Arabs. Russia has not just forgiven Syria for my debt of 10 billion. For all this Assad will owe Russia. Russia retains a base there, which is beneficial to it, retains influence in the region, etc.
          The Syrian people do not care about Russia and the United States. That is cruel reality. All a question of interests and geopolitics. Of course, the fight against terrorism is also a factor, but again it is not taken into account for the Syrians, but in order to protect itself since the spread of igles, its strengthening can lead to the creation of a base for terrorist attacks around the world, not to mention the neighboring igles countries.
    2. +3
      15 November 2017 10: 43
      Assad is trying pathetic attempts to regain all of Syria


      as for me so pathetic attempts at you. attempts

      Civil war, do not forget about it. It began before the terrorists entered Syria


      yeah suddenly started.

      a tranu in which people had no right to express their opinion, nor the right to justice or normal life.


      you tell these stories in your circus.

      The United States has a VETO in the UN Security Council and therefore, as the United States defended the opposition, they will.


      defended the opposition? Well, okay

      Therefore, the miserable cries of the Syrian Foreign Ministry at the UN do not bother anyone. The dog barks - the caravan goes on.


      it is called law и right. you all went to your door


      Although I completely agree that the UN should cease to exist, as it only creates problems and cannot solve them.


      but I believe that Israel should cease to exist as an artificial state, which is less than the granny from a neighboring apartment.

      1. +1
        15 November 2017 11: 12
        Quote: c-Petrov
        Assad is trying pathetic attempts to regain all of Syria


        as for me so pathetic attempts at you. attempts

        Civil war, do not forget about it. It began before the terrorists entered Syria


        yeah suddenly started.

        a tranu in which people had no right to express their opinion, nor the right to justice or normal life.


        you tell these stories in your circus.

        The United States has a VETO in the UN Security Council and therefore, as the United States defended the opposition, they will.


        defended the opposition? Well, okay

        Therefore, the miserable cries of the Syrian Foreign Ministry at the UN do not bother anyone. The dog barks - the caravan goes on.


        it is called law и right. you all went to your door


        Although I completely agree that the UN should cease to exist, as it only creates problems and cannot solve them.


        but I believe that Israel should cease to exist as an artificial state, which is less than the granny from a neighboring apartment.

        Duc of Syria is not much more years old than Israel - it was artificially formed by the decision of the Britons and Franks - tearing the lands seized from the Ottomans during the WWII, with Palestine leaving to the British, and Syria to the French, who allocated another garbage - the state of Arab Christians Lebanon.
        As a result, Israel is a highly developed state (18th place in the world HDI - for comparison, Germany is 6, Russia is 49), and Syria, despite the oil and large territory with a population, even in the best years remained a third world country, and by no means the fault of the States, Masons, Martians and Zionists.
    3. 0
      15 November 2017 10: 52
      Quote: Viktorfi
      This is not the first statement by the Syrian government, which aims not only to defeat terrorism, but also to return the dictatorial regime of tyrant Assad back.

      Civil war, do not forget about it. It began before the terrorists entered Syria, using it to weaken the civil war.
      Syria will now be divided and Assad is trying pathetic attempts to regain all of Syria. The country that he received not by right, like his father is a dictator. A country in which people had no right to express their opinion, nor the right to justice or normal life.

      The United States has a VETO in the UN Security Council and therefore, as the United States defended the opposition, they will. Just as Russia uses its veto to defend itself and Assad in the UN Security Council, the United States will act in the same way.
      Everyone here writes that the UN is subordinate to the United States, but they forget that Russia makes excellent use of the leverage in the UN Security Council to protect itself and does this with marked constancy, and the so-called UN submission to the United States, the United States does not help.


      Therefore, the miserable cries of the Syrian Foreign Ministry at the UN do not bother anyone. The dog barks - the caravan goes on.

      Although I completely agree that the UN should cease to exist, as it only creates problems and cannot solve them.

      The dictator is not a dictator - before the Civil War, people there did not die like flies, and the Iranians did not think to open bases in the Ramat a Golan area. By the way, in one of the London museums there is a letter from Grandfather Assad (leader of the Alawites) to the British, where he asks the British to protect Jews and other minorities from Arab nationalism :)))
      If not for Sayz-Piko, the Alavites would have served in the MAGAV and the IDF along with the Druze and Circassians, so not everything is so simple.
      1. 0
        15 November 2017 12: 22
        Quote: Krasnodar
        The dictator is not a dictator - before the Civil War, there people did not die like flies


        The Civil War is like that. There are victims in it. A lot of.

        Again, do not mix civil war and the igil that you climbed there.


        Of course, you can put hamsters in a cage, give them some food and do with hamsters, anything - this is also an option. It suits some hamsters winked



        Quote: Krasnodar
        Iranians did not think to open bases in Ramat a Golan


        The strengthening of Iran in Syria was already in process at that time. Therefore, in the end, we would come to a similar situation regarding Iran, as now.
    4. +4
      15 November 2017 11: 26
      Quote: Viktorfi
      but also bring back the dictatorial regime of tyrant Assad back

      and what do you mean by "dictatorship and tyranny"? ....
      compliance with the law, certain rules and regulations, or the ability to live without pointers?
      1. +2
        15 November 2017 11: 33
        Quote: Deadush
        "dictatorship and tyranny"? ....
        compliance with the law, certain rules and regulations, or the ability to live without pointers?



        At least compliance with the law, separation of the judiciary from the executive, the right to legal protests, the right to a fair trial, freedom of the press. And much more that was not in Syria under the rule of dictator Assad.
        1. +4
          15 November 2017 11: 52
          Where did you find this? ...
          The whole press is selling and controlled like the rest ...
          This is all ephemeral ...
          And why should it all be like someone decided?! ...
          Always for something you have to pay.
          When you own one, you lose something else.
          And you better tell others about it ... there are a lot of “good” Arabs with a “right” way of life.
          1. 0
            15 November 2017 12: 08
            Quote: Deadush
            Where did you find this? ...
            The whole press is selling and controlled like the rest ...
            This is all ephemeral ...


            In more or less normal countries, there is a confrontation of forces. Democrats and republicans have an influence and for those, thereby creating democracy in the sense that one does not allow the others to take complete control over everything.
            In other countries, this is also provided by different parties in which different forces.
            Therefore, when, for example, the press is corrupt and controlled, for example, by both Democrats and Republicans, then they press on each other, they come up with incriminating evidence, investigations, etc.





            Quote: Deadush
            And why should it all be like someone decided?! ...


            Actually, I agree here. Just internal problems in these countries should not affect other countries to interfere with other countries, create problems for other countries. Dictatorships in our modern world do not really hold out when people are oppressed. It must be remembered that Assad built about 80% of the population on oppression, erecting the Alawites, who are few in the country's administration, the army, etc.
            This approach could not last forever.

            In Israel, under Assad, it was quite quiet on the border. True, Assad at that time was already very hooked on the needle of Iran and the Hezbollah terrorists controlled by Iran. This has created tension in the region beyond all else.
            1. +4
              15 November 2017 12: 18
              Quote: Viktorfi
              Assad built on the oppression of approximately 80% of the population, erecting the Alawites, who are few in the government, the army, etc.

              always a minority rules the majority!
              the only thing in the USSR was some kind of equality and opportunity, and that was the "party members".
              Quote: Viktorfi
              Just internal problems in these countries should not affect other countries to interfere with other countries

              Duc, neighbors as they say do not choose laughing
              1. 0
                15 November 2017 13: 32
                Quote: Deadush
                always a minority rules the majority!


                This is different. You go to another steppe completely.
                It depends on what aspect.
                In religious it is not so. Show me at least one stable country where a religious minority rules a religious majority.
                Do not confuse different things.
                Especially if you look at the picture of the Muslim confrontation in the world, which goes along the religious movements of Islam.
                Muslims have been killing each other for hundreds of years.
                Therefore, it is naive to expect that a religious minority will keep forever a religious majority.



                Quote: Deadush
                Duc, neighbors as they say do not choose


                Yes, that's why various kinds of problems arise.
                1. +4
                  15 November 2017 14: 24
                  it’s better not to touch religion at all, this is a separate song.
                  Quote: Viktorfi
                  This is different. You go to another steppe completely.

                  from what?! ... has the most direct and direct relation to management
        2. 0
          15 November 2017 11: 53
          Quote: Viktorfi


          At least compliance with the law, separation of the judiciary from the executive, the right to legal protests, the right to a fair trial, freedom of the press. And much more that was not in Syria under the rule of dictator Assad.

          Separation of the judiciary from the executive is not good :)
          So you won the court, and then you have to run after the bailiffs (oclap) so that this decision is enforced ..
          How do you like it?
          1. 0
            15 November 2017 12: 14
            Quote: Krasnodar
            Separation of the judiciary from the executive is not good :)
            So you won the court, and then you have to run after the bailiffs (oclap) so that this decision is enforced ..
            How do you like it?


            Is this how you see the situation, or is it that you were joking so? wassat
        3. +1
          15 November 2017 12: 15
          And what, did the Syrians live poorly or were forbidden from practicing any religion ??? Who declared Assad dictators? - Saudis, Yankees and Israel! Who did not like the independence of Syria and its leadership in terms of pipelines. Nothing personal, business (what a bad word!). Everything in the world of capitalism is decided by those who have more money and arrogance. The Saudis have more money, Israel has the arrogance, but the Yankees equally have both.

          And in general, as soon as Israel does not like it - it starts throwing th ... but at the fan, which is what our colleague's commentary from there shows.
          1. 0
            15 November 2017 12: 37
            Quote: Severok
            And what, did the Syrians live poorly or were forbidden from practicing any religion ???


            Yes.


            Quote: Severok
            Who declared Asadov dictators?


            Assad’s behavior fits this definition. The person who leads the dictatorial regime, the sole ruler of the state, overwhelming. So it was.


            Quote: Severok
            And in general, as soon as Israel does not like it - it starts throwing th ... but at the fan, which is what our colleague's commentary from there shows.


            Israel is just the same beneficial silence in Syria. As correctly noted, life in or near countries with problems reduces the desire to invest in it, to conduct field development, etc.

            Israel just doesn’t want Hezbollah’s terrorists not to receive weapons from Iran and not settle in Syria on the border, as this will ultimately lead to conflict.

            Indeed, if you recall, the UN Security Council, including Russia, voted in a resolution for the disarmament of Hezbollah. Several times by the way. Have you implemented the resolution? No.
            Also, countries are forbidden to transfer weapons to Hezbollah - and this is violated. Iran supplies them with weapons.
            Therefore, Israel has no choice. If the UN Security Council does not comply with its decisions, then Israel has to do the work itself, as this threatens the country's security.

            By the way, although Russia does not consider Hezbollah openly as terrorists, it understands perfectly well the needs of Israel and therefore does not prevent Israel from striking at it, at caravans of weapons, etc. Assad helps to keep weapons and transport, for which he also pays a certain price. Assad owes help to Iran and Hezbollah and therefore helps them.
            Russia agrees with the position of Israel in this matter and does not interfere with Israel.

            Moreover, Russia does not need a strong Iran in Syria. In words, Russia can be an ally of Iran, but in fact, as we see, it does not help them against Israel and does not interfere with Israel.
  7. Gml
    +1
    15 November 2017 10: 25
    violates UN foundations
    And there
    Ukrainian draft resolution on Crimea approved
    And how to dance? On the one hand and on the other hand?
  8. 0
    15 November 2017 10: 38
    Mattis also said that the Pentagon has no plans to withdraw its units until a diplomatic settlement of the situation in the country.
    Russia also needs to help diplomatically resolve the situation in Venezuela with its units, but legally, at the invitation of Maduro ...
  9. +1
    15 November 2017 11: 00
    Well, finally. I expected that after the victories there should be a political extrusion of all outsiders.
    I hope this is only the first remarks; diplomatic pressure on the United States and its allies will gradually unfold now.
    1. Gml
      +1
      15 November 2017 11: 06
      diplomatic pressure on the United States and its allies will unfold
      By whom? who will push then?
  10. 0
    15 November 2017 11: 21
    Well, where are the UN gatherings, where are our, Chinese, Iranians and Syrians raising the question with an edge?
  11. +1
    15 November 2017 11: 43
    "The Syrian Foreign Ministry called aggression any foreign military presence in the country without coordination with the government."...

    Woke up, mmlynnn ... I was all waiting - when will they be honored? It turns out that it was necessary to free most of the territory with the help of Russia, and then - I'm sure - after an energetic Russian kick, all the same, to declare aggression ...
    To be honest, it’s both embarrassing, annoying, and spiteful from such behavior of the majority of countries and their politicians ... And I’m sure. that more than half of the countries and their politicians, this gendarme - the USA - have long been sick of it ...
    Yeah. ... So intimidating the whole world is still cool ... recourse
  12. +1
    15 November 2017 12: 10
    it's an occupation
  13. 0
    15 November 2017 12: 37
    The Syrian Foreign Ministry must shout about it to the whole world !!! And the more often, the better!
    ... and let them go from here! ...
    soldier
  14. +1
    15 November 2017 12: 57
    That's how interesting! Or what I do not understand? Only in Syria there is no democracy in the Middle East ?! Or are there others where kings and sultans rule? Why don't the states put things in order there? Why do they decide which ruler is a dictator and who is not? And then there are also European monarchies - why are they considered democratic?
  15. 0
    15 November 2017 15: 59
    Quote: Viktorfi
    The Syrian people do not care about Russia and the United States.

    Maybe you shouldn’t judge by yourself?
    And as for spitting on the Syrian people and caring for ordinary people in distress, how much humanitarian aid has been delivered by the USA, EU countries, Israel to Syria?
    Do you want to remember production videos and screams about chemical weapons, bombing of residential areas by “coalition countries”?
    Do you have any remnants of conscience for you, an ordinary person, to make statements about the civil war and everyone in the white forces of the United States, when it has long been clear what IS and the whole set of abominations that actually destroyed Syria? The set of abominations that robbed, mined and destroyed unique objects of world cultural heritage? When even in the United States themselves voices are heard about the enormity of support for the insane, devouring the human internal organs of cannibals.
    Are you there in your mind, man?
  16. 0
    15 November 2017 16: 53
    ... you need to make sure the Yankees themselves immediately get out of Syria ...
  17. 0
    15 November 2017 17: 51
    Even as it violates. It will be necessary to sue them again.
  18. 0
    15 November 2017 20: 58
    UN foundations violates Assad’s use of chemical weapons, carpet bombing and the transfer of the “presidency” by inheritance, rather than the presence of Americans. So whose cow would moo.