Military Review
Sign in Sign up

In the US, fear of reducing control in the Russian nuclear complex

61
The level of security of the Russian nuclear complex may be reduced due to the country's withdrawal from “bilateral cooperation” with the United States on these issues, reports RIA News Statement by Special Assistant to the President of the United States on WMD Non-Proliferation Christopher Ford.




Speaking at a conference at the Hudson Institute, he noted that "Moscow will need to allocate significant financial and human resources to ensure adequate security of its nuclear infrastructure, but this is not always a question that Russia is putting before itself."

According to Ford, this circumstance may lead to the aggravation of problems in the nuclear sector.

Today, when Russians are working to create new nuclear weapons and new delivery systems for nuclear weaponsBy expanding its infrastructure, these problems may become even more acute in the coming years,
said the special assistant to the American president.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
Military Reviewin Yandex News
Military Reviewin Google News
61 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. 210ox
    210ox 15 November 2017 08: 41
    29
    We’ll figure it out without snotty .. Advisers were found ..
    1. destination
      destination 15 November 2017 08: 48
      11
      Well, yes, as they stopped letting them into Yasny, the same, as they did under Borka, they immediately became bad for the “partners” ... laughing
      1. Vladimir16
        Vladimir16 15 November 2017 09: 19
        +5
        Vile articles about the Russians are regularly published in the media. IN is no exception. Some mattress said that the Russians have security problems in the "nuclear complex." And this star is racing printed in the media.
        There are facts ???
        Who do you work for? And at whose expense?
        1. figwam
          figwam 15 November 2017 09: 36
          +1
          The level of security of the Russian nuclear complex may decrease due to the country's withdrawal from "bilateral cooperation" with the United States on these issues,

          Such a statement once again proves that nothing changes in the worldview of the FSU, the whole world is natives for them.
        2. edeligor
          edeligor 15 November 2017 10: 04
          0
          Quote: Vladimir16
          And this star is racing printed in the media.

          This fact also surprises me. The question is what for ?! To know the conditional opponent? So with this a long time ago busting ...
          1. Dorren
            Dorren 15 November 2017 10: 36
            +3
            Come on, on the contrary, it’s nice to read that the level of control (USA) over our nuclear complex has decreased and that its security level has significantly decreased (for the USA).
        3. dzuar saubarag
          dzuar saubarag 15 November 2017 12: 09
          +2
          Look deeper - news can be not only pleasant. And the publication of these vile articles on VO only conveys to us that it would become clear what kind of "weather" is in the world. Therefore, these abominations are useful for maintaining good spirits and defenses!
    2. stolz
      stolz 15 November 2017 08: 49
      +4
      Let them be better worried about the expansion of NATO, for
      Today, when the Russians are working to create new nuclear weapons and new nuclear weapons delivery systems, expanding their infrastructure, these problems may become even more acute in the coming years.
      1. DMB_95
        DMB_95 15 November 2017 10: 50
        0
        Today, when the Russians are working to create new nuclear weapons and new nuclear weapons delivery systems, expanding their infrastructure, these problems may become even more acute in the coming years.
        Exactly . Creating “even more acute” problems for our enemies is one of our top priorities.
    3. Same lech
      Same lech 15 November 2017 08: 49
      19
      At the time, under Yeltsin, the Americans were admitted to the holy of holies of our country at our nuclear facilities and they had the opportunity to assess the real nuclear potential of Russia ...

      I counted and count now it is a betrayal of our country and our people... it must be stopped.
      1. aszzz888
        aszzz888 15 November 2017 08: 54
        +7
        Same lech Today, 08: 4 ... I considered and still consider it a betrayal of our country and our people ... this must be stopped.

        ... they allowed state secrets into the "holy of holies"! ... it just doesn’t fit into my head that the merikatos lived on these special objects, and THESE flags were standing there! ... it had to be humiliated like that !!!. .. request
        1. Vladimir16
          Vladimir16 15 November 2017 09: 22
          0
          Quote: The same LYOKHA
          I thought and I think now it betrayal of our country and our people... it must be stopped

          You would bother to express your anger more competently. You wrote from the fact that the Russian people betrayed someone.
          A little slower horses, a little slower ... wink
          1. Same lech
            Same lech 15 November 2017 10: 03
            +4
            You would bother to express your anger more competently. You wrote from the fact that the Russian people betrayed someone.


            Such is the Russian language ... the meaning of a word or sentence can be understood in different ways depending on the situation and the depth of its knowledge. . smile
            I will try to decipher what you said ...

            Treason of the Russian people (by the way, I did not write the word Russian) ...

            this means that a group of some politicians or high-ranking people (officials) as you wish ... betrayed the interests of our people by creating a threat to their security by giving out to a potential enemy all the characteristics of the nuclear potential of RUSSIA.
            The quantity, composition, quality, location and production capabilities of nuclear weapons and their carriers.
            Based on this information, the US State Department is pursuing its policy towards RUSSIA ... the same US instant strike strategy is the result of such a betrayal of our top officials from the time of Yeltsin.

            That’s what I had in brief. hi
      2. Evdokim
        Evdokim 15 November 2017 09: 00
        +4
        Quote: The same LYOKHA
        At the time of Yeltsin, the Americans were admitted to the holy of holies of our country at our nuclear facilities

        We walked, looked well and that's enough. hi
    4. Monos
      Monos 15 November 2017 08: 54
      10
      In the US, fear of reducing control in the Russian nuclear complex

      That is, the amers were driven by a filthy broom from our nuclear facilities. Correctly fear! Now you can’t walk around the regime with a beer or dig deeper into secrets. smile
    5. Ami du peuple
      Ami du peuple 15 November 2017 08: 57
      10
      Quote: 210ox
      Without snotty we will understand ..

      It's all a little thinner. It is these “snotty” statements that prepare “world public opinion” for the need for full international (read: state) control over Russian nuclear facilities, because “Moscow does not allocate significant financial and human resources to ensure adequate security of its nuclear infrastructure”
      It is clear that this is not possible at the moment, but with the internal political destabilization of the Russian Federation, the "partners" may try to "provide assistance to Russia in nuclear safety issues ..."
      1. iliitchitch
        iliitchitch 15 November 2017 09: 11
        +4
        Quote: Ami du peuple
        It's all a little thinner. It is these “snotty” similar statements that prepare “world public opinion” for the need for full international (read: state) control over Russian nuclear facilities

        The thinnest is nowhere, yes. How long will they cook? And then - control and accounting? What rubbish. As there Zhirik came up: "there would be guns, but there is oil," here he is right. In an extreme case, we take ourselves how much oil is needed. Some kind of public opinion.
        1. Ami du peuple
          Ami du peuple 15 November 2017 09: 31
          +2
          Quote: iliitch
          How long will they cook?
          As much as necessary, so much will be. They still have time and finances.
          Quote: iliitch
          And then - control and accounting?
          Yes, and, moreover, use in the interests of the "world community"
          Quote: iliitch
          What rubbish.
          In the 89th year, even a hypothetical teaching about the presence of American controllers in Arzamas-16 seemed to be nonsense. AND?
          Quote: iliitch
          How did the Zhirik get there
          Zhirinovsky’s opinion is especially significant, yes
          Quote: iliitch
          In extreme cases, we take
          For now, just give
          Quote: iliitch
          Some kind of public opinion
          And here is one that, as we have to admit, is not at all on the side of Russia in the countries of the consolidated West. And then every bast in a row ...
    6. Finches
      Finches 15 November 2017 09: 12
      +4
      Another moan pin ... Americans satisfied! laughing
    7. To be or not to be
      To be or not to be 15 November 2017 10: 09
      +1
      "In the US, they fear a decrease in control in the Russian nuclear complex"
      Nothing new ... their usual practice .. even boring! ("Thief screams:" "hold thief" "")
      This should be read: "The United States began developing in its nuclear complex. The smoke screen and switching the attention of the world community to similar ones in the Russian Federation"
    8. Vlad.by
      Vlad.by 15 November 2017 21: 53
      0
      Let him keep an eye on his Westinghouse. And then they don’t see their problems, but strangers hypertrophy.
  2. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 15 November 2017 08: 50
    +7
    Yes, they can only envy our achievements in the nuclear industry. Just one system with fast reactors is worth it. What about a closed fuel cycle? A "tolerant fuel"? We burned our own plutonium at the stations ... Well, so we do not have to “accumulate” it for long.
    1. GRF
      GRF 15 November 2017 09: 09
      +2
      Yeah, in the open field, where the reactors that used to produce it used to stand ...


      Someone squanders good, and someone once created it in "paradise" conditions ... It is a pity that we are all ...

      So what about not for long, is it a lie, not that system, but for this - we don’t know how to print money ...
      1. kuznec
        kuznec 15 November 2017 09: 21
        +2
        Eugene, not in the open field, but in the mountain, and did not "stand", but stand, I hope, "under the steam." Do not worry, run for a short time :-)
        1. GRF
          GRF 15 November 2017 09: 51
          +1
          This field is visible from my window ...
          And the tractors work, yes ... But on the other, and they do, the other ... Pleasing ...

          Yes, I don’t worry, there are enough reserves in the bins, thanks to the ancestors ...
          Yes, and the reduction in stocks scheduled for the 18th, like a brake ...

          He was sober ...

          And I do not mean ghk ...
  3. aszzz888
    aszzz888 15 November 2017 08: 52
    +7
    ... the mericatos walked around our special objects and that's enough ... it's time to think and make appropriate decisions with your own head ... angry
    1. Jedi
      Jedi 15 November 2017 08: 54
      10
      Hi! hi Let them worry for their nuclear arsenal - it’s with them, and not with us, the dumbfounded ones are sitting on the button! am
      1. aszzz888
        aszzz888 15 November 2017 08: 57
        +3
        Jedi Today, 08:54 p.m. ↑

        Hello old hi ! ... Maxim, wrote the comets above, To the same Leha ... it’s just a complete loss, as the current youth says, what was happening in our special facilities !!!
        1. Jedi
          Jedi 15 November 2017 09: 02
          +8
          Yes, I read.
          Quote: aszzz888
          ... allowed into the "holy of holies" state secrets! ...

          They let the goat into the garden, but he liked it! negative
    2. Going
      Going 15 November 2017 09: 08
      10
      It does not fit in my head what this could be and what a wise guy advised EBN.
    3. alstr
      alstr 15 November 2017 10: 00
      +1
      Alas, not only took a walk, but also bought a lot of our technologies for nothing because there was nothing for people to live on, and the ministry did not give a penny.
      So they worked on grants. (((True, they didn’t do any new developments - they just started to use their old zagashniks.
  4. Pacifist
    Pacifist 15 November 2017 08: 52
    11
    This is said by people who have been lost ... Karl lost !!! 4 nuclear munitions! and the on-duty change of nuclear strike forces was found to be using drugs and alcohol during the shift ... gentlemen, go on foot on an erotic route, they are worried. Take care of yourself.
    1. aszzz888
      aszzz888 15 November 2017 09: 00
      +2
      Pacifist Today, 08:52 AM
      This is said by people who were lost ... Karl lost !!! 4 nuclear munitions! and the on-duty change of nuclear strike forces was found to be involved in drug and alcohol use during the shift.

      ... campaign, for a long time we had to unilaterally withdraw from the contract ...
  5. Fedorov
    Fedorov 15 November 2017 08: 55
    +5
    Everything is lost. The client leaves, the plaster is removed. and what would they be more afraid of, a lid for them from a tin can on a collar weighing 150 tons from the Saratov region
  6. Non liberoid Russian
    Non liberoid Russian 15 November 2017 08: 55
    +3
    that's it, problems, for those who are looking for these problems .... for a couple of hundreds of kilotons in TNT equivalent
  7. Romanenko
    Romanenko 15 November 2017 08: 59
    +4
    It would be better to keep an eye on yourself, some schools of Westinghouse are worth ...
    1. urman
      urman 16 November 2017 10: 41
      0
      Quote: Romanenko
      some jambs Westinghouse what are

      And drug addicts on duty at the rockets.
  8. annodomene
    annodomene 15 November 2017 09: 01
    +6
    That's even the Russian requirements for providing nuclear warheads two orders of magnitude tougher than those of the IAEA, IMHO. T.ch. first of all let them put things in order at home fool , and then they tell the big uncles how to ensure security in the nuclear weapons center.
  9. bald
    bald 15 November 2017 09: 05
    +4
    The woodpecker said and beat the back of his head on a tree. There were so many contracts, but our naive trust ... !!! It's time to finish, cook all kinds of toilet papers.
  10. Verkhomnapule
    Verkhomnapule 15 November 2017 09: 34
    0
    good they put ghouls, fear Russia correctly !!!
  11. Kleber
    Kleber 15 November 2017 09: 39
    +1
    The whole essence of the article lies in the fact that Russia continues to design and build, and does not ride on the Maidan.
  12. Kent0001
    Kent0001 15 November 2017 09: 41
    +1
    Let them control their drug addicts, who are on guard in the system of nuclear weapons of the United States.
  13. SklochPensioner
    SklochPensioner 15 November 2017 09: 48
    0
    "... this is not always the question that Russia poses for itself."

    It's about security issues.
    (censorship))) I’ve slept somewhere for ten or fifteen years, sleepiness brought nonsense) ...
    1. urman
      urman 16 November 2017 10: 43
      0
      Quote: SklochPensioner
      I’ve slept somewhere for ten or fifteen years, sleeplessness carried nonsense) ...

      Yes, not just smoked again.
  14. rocket757
    rocket757 15 November 2017 09: 57
    +4
    They kicked their spies away from objects important for our survival and safety ... this is the concern for SAFETY.
    Let them chug now and BE AFRAID !!! for the whole world it will be more useful in terms of security!
  15. Tolik_74
    Tolik_74 15 November 2017 10: 13
    0
    Cho smoked in a pintagon, glass wool or something.
  16. Reserve buildbat
    Reserve buildbat 15 November 2017 10: 14
    +3
    That is, as I understand it, in Russia, control over the safety of nuclear facilities has improved, which greatly upsets the "observers" who have lost the ability to steal even the crumbs of our technology
  17. Alexander Abdrakhmanov
    Alexander Abdrakhmanov 15 November 2017 10: 14
    +1
    If you contact America, you will ruin all of science in Russia. You cannot allow a cannon shot at our facilities. They have already been under Yeltsin once — they have ravaged thousands of factories in Russia. We do not need an overseer; we’ll figure it out ourselves. We looked at the photo once - and then for the United States this is a lot. The most lying country in the world, you can still insert Ukraine there. Than to entrust something to them - first you have to torture a whole thing.
  18. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 15 November 2017 10: 39
    +1
    The subtext of such a statement is understandable - we can help you with security, just let it happen. The answer suggests itself - look for fools elsewhere.
    1. rocket757
      rocket757 15 November 2017 10: 58
      +3
      Yes there are fools, that's not a question.
      Americans by inertia mutter, do not want to admit that for some time Russia has escaped from this pool ... I hope for good.
  19. Eurodav
    Eurodav 15 November 2017 11: 38
    +1
    Dad don't teach mom, mom knows how easy it is!
    (folklore)
  20. dzuar saubarag
    dzuar saubarag 15 November 2017 12: 17
    +1
    In general, it looks like a veiled threat. We won’t be surprised if some "oppressed people" in a desperate attempt to attract the attention of the "world community" to their grievous fate commit (try) a terrorist attack on your objects! I hope that the relevant services will not weaken the vigilance! From the "Western partners" we can expect such special events ... angry
  21. Victor-M
    Victor-M 15 November 2017 14: 12
    +1
    The security level of the Russian nuclear complex may decrease due to the country's exit from “Bilateral cooperation” with the USA on these issues

    Bilateral cooperation with the United States consists in unilateral control by the United States.
    Speaking at a conference at the Hudson Institute, he noted that “Moscow will need to allocate significant financial and human resources to ensure adequate security of its nuclear infrastructure,

    Unlike some US, Russia did not lose nuclear bombs. laughing
  22. qwests
    qwests 15 November 2017 14: 58
    0
    it is necessary to invite their specialists, before that check for competence and if it is confirmed, such .... pile up cells so that they themselves refuse inspections and inspections and no longer stutter.
  23. Chever
    Chever 15 November 2017 16: 53
    0
    Today, when the Russians are working to create new nuclear weapons and new nuclear weapons delivery systems, expanding their infrastructure, these problems may become even more acute in the coming years.

    "Bullshit ..." (C)
  24. Sergey53
    Sergey53 15 November 2017 17: 49
    0
    We will think that everything is at the highest level. You worry about yourself. There is nothing to poke your nose where you do not need. You are our caring.
  25. razved
    razved 15 November 2017 21: 33
    0
    Merikos are concerned that they will no longer be able to control what is being done in the nuclear complex. To safety they are like to the moon. They only need control.
  26. sharp-lad
    sharp-lad 16 November 2017 03: 30
    0
    Judged by themselves! laughing
  27. vinni-puk
    vinni-puk 16 November 2017 07: 13
    0
    Woodpeckers, you watch yourself!
  28. bratchanin3
    bratchanin3 16 November 2017 10: 47
    0
    In the American establishment there are many idiots and generally not adequate individuals, and what, will they all be quoted?
  29. Simon
    Simon 16 November 2017 10: 56
    0
    Well, let them get angry, and we will do what we want! tongue