Military Review

A batch of new Suntsep systems will be delivered to the RCB protection division of BBO.

17
Representatives of the RCB protection division began accepting new flame-throwing systems "Sunpipek" at the factory, reports press office Eastern District.




Specialist officers of the RHB defense unit of the Eastern Military District, stationed in the Amur Region, began accepting several heavy TOS-1A Solntsepek heavy flamethrower systems at the factory tank T-72,
says release.

These machines in this unit will arrive for the first time. Acceptance of new equipment is planned to be completed before the end of this year.

The press service recalled that “the TOC-1A flame-thrower system is designed to disable lightly armored and automotive vehicles, arson and destroy structures and buildings, destroy enemy personnel, located in open areas and in fortifications, fragments, shock wave created on the target area with the massive use of unguided rockets in thermobaric and smoke-igniting equipment. "
Photos used:
http://voenchel.ru
17 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Warrior with machine gun
    Warrior with machine gun 14 November 2017 16: 28 New
    +7
    now they’re "kidnapping" there)))
  2. Kleber
    Kleber 14 November 2017 16: 40 New
    +5
    The receipt of equipment in the army and navy is always good news.
    1. Mikhail Zubkov
      Mikhail Zubkov 14 November 2017 17: 48 New
      +1
      The range of fire and, in general, the power of the system, we must think, were increased ... Not an export option!
      1. Kleber
        Kleber 14 November 2017 17: 51 New
        0
        Well, the exact performance characteristics for no one will tell.
      2. just exp
        just exp 15 November 2017 00: 05 New
        +2
        what for ? The sun was generally improved by Pinocchio, its application provided that he would go in the same order as the tanks and direct fire, which is why he was on the tank chassis.
        and if you need a range, ALREADY HAVE ALREADY been a Grad, to which thermobaric ammunition has been made for a long time, moreover they are for both Tornado and Hurricane. and there the range and power are even greater.
  3. Simon
    Simon 14 November 2017 18: 25 New
    +2
    Friends, a hell of a machine came out for our enemies, now they will sunbathe under our Sunshine! wassat
  4. NKT
    NKT 14 November 2017 18: 28 New
    +1
    The press service recalled that "the TOS-1A flamethrower system is designed to disable lightly armored and automotive vehicles, set fire to and destroy structures and buildings ....


    It was not developed for this at all, and therefore was assigned to the army of the Russian Chemical Forces.
    1. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 14 November 2017 18: 41 New
      +3
      Quote: NKT
      It was not developed for this at all, and therefore was assigned to the army of the Russian Chemical Forces.

      EMNIP, we have all flamethrowers and, in general, incendiary weapons refers to the RKhBZ Troops.
      1. Lopatov
        Lopatov 14 November 2017 18: 57 New
        +1
        Quote: Alexey RA
        we have all flamethrowers and generally incendiary weapons

        All flamethrowers. Ever since the First World War.
        However, with TOC it is not so simple. Formally, the thermobaric munition has the same relation to incendiary weapons as the OF art. metallized hexogen shells
        1. Alexey RA
          Alexey RA 14 November 2017 19: 04 New
          0
          Quote: Spade
          All flamethrowers. Ever since the First World War.

          Well, yes ... it's not for nothing that flamethrower tanks were called chemical tanks.
          But it’s interesting - to whom did these guys relate: directly to engineers or chemists as part of an engineering unit?
          1. Lopatov
            Lopatov 14 November 2017 19: 29 New
            +1
            Quote: Alexey RA
            But it’s interesting - to whom did these guys relate: directly to engineers or chemists as part of an engineering unit?

            To chemists. The so-called “OBRO” was present at the SHISBr state - a separate battalion of knapsack flamethrowers.
            The most interesting thing was with the tankers. Some SHISBr included engineer-tank (tankers) and flamethrower-tank (chemists) regiments

            As for incendiary weapons, not everything was under the chemists. It was used independently by artillerymen and aircraft.
            1. Alexey RA
              Alexey RA 14 November 2017 19: 46 New
              +2
              Quote: Spade
              To chemists. The so-called “OBRO” was present at the SHISBr state - a separate battalion of knapsack flamethrowers.

              Clear. That is, the storm squad groups were given flamethrowers from this battalion. And the battalions and companies of flamethrowers, regardless of current subordination, belonged to chemical forces.
              Quote: Spade
              The most interesting thing was with the tankers. Some SHISBr included engineer-tank (tankers) and flamethrower-tank (chemists) regiments

              And here everything is logical. Engineering tank regiments are minesweepers. And flamethrower tanks are chemists.
              Although the OSh of an engineering and tank regiment is a song: the regiment consisted of a command, four companies (3 ytr and 1 ro) and three platoons (sapper reconnaissance, machine gunners and control). smile There are no battalions in the regiment.
          2. Paranoid50
            Paranoid50 14 November 2017 19: 38 New
            +2
            Quote: Alexey RA
            who did these guys relate to:

            Rather, the second, for these were not purely flamethrower groups. Yes, flamethrowers as part of the pioneer assault units. Something like this.
            1. Lopatov
              Lopatov 14 November 2017 19: 55 New
              +1
              Quote: Paranoid50
              Rather, the second, for these were not purely flamethrower groups.

              Purely flamethrower links - two flamethrowers and a link commander. Which were attached to the assault groups. They were given, and were not subordinated, because because of the peculiarities in the "replenishment of the BC" they were forced to operate quite autonomously, they tried to reload points in the immediate rear, but on the outskirts. For obvious reasons. On the one hand, it is dangerous, on the other hand, it is noticeable and audible due to the operation of the compressors
              1. Paranoid50
                Paranoid50 14 November 2017 20: 14 New
                +2
                Quote: Spade
                On the one hand, it’s dangerous, on the other, it’s noticeable

                Thanks, okay. Well, yes, keeping the mixture on the front end is fawn.
                1. Lopatov
                  Lopatov 14 November 2017 20: 27 New
                  +2
                  It just turned out that the fawn is not with flammable mixture, but with the charging of cylinders with compressed air. This is the compressor that dragged the truck. They had two, and later three companies of flamethrowers, a whole autorot for these purposes.
                  Well, regarding the links, apparently, there was some kind of reserve, which replaced those who went to replenish the BC as part of the assault groups.
                  1. Paranoid50
                    Paranoid50 14 November 2017 20: 34 New
                    +4
                    Quote: Spade
                    This is a compressor

                    Yes, in order to drown out the sound of the compressor, it seemed that artillery preparation was required.