Ivan Kalita - politics outside morality

39
March 31 is the day of the death of Grand Duke Vladimirsky, a cunning, cruel and intelligent politician Ivan Kalita. The period of his rule is estimated ambiguously. Some researchers consider this prince a great collector of Russian lands, others a traitor to the people and a zealous servant of the Golden Horde Khan Uzbek. He was awarded epithets: "miser", "hypocrite", "treacherous Tatar man". Ivan apparently received his nickname from the habit of constantly carrying around a wallet (“kalita”) with money to distribute alms.

The exact date of birth and death of Ivan Kalita is not known either. Historians point out only the approximate year of his birth 1288, although many doubt this (other sources indicate 1283 year). There is a problem with determining the date of death of Kalita - 1340 or 1341 year. The future grand duke was born the fourth son of the Moscow ruler, Daniil Alexandrovich, and for a long time could not count on the throne of Moscow. For a long time, Ivan remained in the shadow of the elder brother of Moscow Prince Yury Danilovich. His great grandfather Alexander Nevsky is often compared to Ivan Danilovich, trying to find the origins of peaceful coexistence with the Golden Horde.

Ivan Kalita - politics outside morality
Ivan Kalita, distributing alms.Koshelev R.


Officially, Ivan Kalita was married twice. His first wife, Princess Elena, who passed away in 1331, seems to have been his peer. There is no information about what kind the princess was, however, it is known that she gave birth to four sons and four daughters during the marriage, and before her death she took the monastic vows and was called Solomonis. Nothing is known about the date of marriage either, but it should be assumed that the prince was married, as was customary, as a youth. Helen was the mother of Simeon Gordomu, Ivan the Red and Andrei Serpukhovsky.

The second wife of Kalita is Princess Uliana, whose origin has not been established for certain. It is known that the princess was much younger than Ivan Danilovich, had a daughter, Maria, and outlived her husband by twenty years. Under the will of the prince she got a lot of wealth and land.

Researchers call the names of the eight children of Kalita:
• Simeon the Proud and Ivan the Red (heirs and grand dukes);
• Andrey Serpukhovsky;
• Daniil and Feotinia (there is practically no information about them);
• Maria (wife of Rostov-Borisoglebsky prince Konstantin);
• Evdokia (wife of Prince Vasily of Yaroslavl);
• Feodosia (princess of the Belozersky principality, wife of Prince Fyodor Romanovich).


The Moscow principality Ivan Danilovich received in 1320 year. For approval as a prince of Moscow, he went to the Golden Horde, where he first met with Khan Uzbek. Already at the first meeting, Khan showed his disposition to Ivan Danilovich, but he demanded that Alexander, the prince of Tver, be forced to come to the capital of the Horde.

V.P. Vereshchagin. Grand Prince of Moscow Ivan Kalita


The political activity of this amazing man began with an original and cunning move. Kalita enlisted the support of Metropolitan Peter, luring him with numerous promises from Vladimir to Moscow. By the demand of Peter the temple of the Mother of God was erected. Already in the early years of his reign, Kalita understood the full force of church influence on the minds of the Russian people. Capital investment, as shown storyjustified itself. 1326, on the square, was laid the Church of the Assumption of Our Lady, it was the first stone building in Moscow of such magnitude. After the death of Peter the Orthodox department remained here, which immediately alerted other influential princes.

This tense period in the history of fragmented Russia was characterized by the strengthening of Tver and numerous demonstrations against the Horde yoke. Voknyazheniyu Ivan Danilovich was preceded by a bloody feud between his brother Yuri Danilovich and Dmitry Tversky, as a result of which Yuri was hacked. A little later, Dmitry of Tver was killed in the Horde, and the princely throne passed to the aforementioned Alexander. The young prince refused to go to the khan for a label and concluded an agreement with Novgorod. The rebellious Alexander was supported by Pskov and the inhabitants of Tver. During the uprising in Tver, the Tatar ambassador of Chol-khan and his entire court, including servants, were brutally murdered, which caused indignation of Khan Uzbek.

Ivan Danilovich took advantage of the current situation in order to eliminate his main political opponents and headed for the Horde. Khan handed him a label on the great reigning and supplied with fifty thousand troops. Kalita headed the punitive Tatar detachment against his own people. Under the command of Ivan Danilovich stood also Suzdal. As Karamzin describes the events, Kalita moved slowly in the hope that Alexander would come to his senses, but after finding out that Tver and Pskov were not going to concede, he was forced to approach Opoka. As a measure of intimidation, he persuaded the Metropolitan to impose a curse on the rebels, but even this did not make them obey.

The Tatars under the leadership of Kalita suppressed the uprising, burned the villages and completely destroyed the land of Tver, a huge number of the local population was driven into slavery. Prince Alexander, leaving his young wife, fled to Lithuania, but then returned and again settled in Tver. In 1339, Alexander was summoned to the Horde at the denunciation of Kalyta, where he and his son were executed in a painful way. Grand Duke Throne Ivan Danilovich received the blood of the Russian people, cunning and betrayal. However, from this point on, raids into the territory did not recur. The tribute was collected on time and regularly sent to Uzbek, although it was heavy. Kalita cruelly suppressed unrest, collecting surplus in his own treasury.

Ivan Danilovich was nicknamed Kalita for his prudence and economy. Countless riches, which he amassed, collecting tribute to the khan, were directed to the expansion of the Moscow principality and the strengthening of its power. At the beginning of the rule, the territory of the principality was only 35 thousand square kilometers, and at the end Moscow was one of the strongest centers of Russia. Long before receiving the label for the Vladimir throne, Kalita was engaged in buying up small and medium-sized plots of land and devastated territories of his neighbors, thereby expanding the boundaries of his possessions. For example, three cities with districts - Uglich, Belozersk and Galich were bought at once. Kalita did not disdain even immoral means, therefore he did not deserve special love of the Russian population. Large territories were torn away from Tver during the period of the suppression of the rebellious Alexander and the rebels. Nevertheless, it cannot be denied that it was thanks to his policy that Moscow gained influence throughout the territory of North-Eastern Russia. Kalita dictated his will to such freedom-loving cities as Pskov and Novgorod, and also sent tribute collectors to Pechora. More than once the people of Novgorod tried to buy off Ivan Danilovich, but the cunning prince always remained adamant.

Sergey Efoshkin. blog Prince John Kalita


In domestic politics, Ivan Danilovich proved himself no less successful. The economic and economical prince controlled expenses, trying to attract as many trade people as possible, developing craft and agriculture. In 1339, the Kremlin was surrounded by an oak wall, Moscow was replenished with new stone buildings. Despite the apparent adherence to the canons of Orthodoxy, Kalita adhered to the principle of religious tolerance in deciding on employment issues. Preference was given to people with outstanding business skills. Tatars, Orthodox Lithuanians, Russians fleeing from the wrath of the specific rulers flocked to Moscow. The pace of development of the principality were among the highest in the entire history of ancient Russia.

In Moscow, criminal offenses were severely punished, so the level of security in the principality has increased significantly. A great attention was paid to Kalita and legislation in the sphere of civil turnover, especially inheritance.

The merit of “unprincipled”, as some researchers call it, the policy of Ivan Danilovich became the forty-year-old calm of the Russian lands. The raids stopped, because the Horde Khan received the tribute set by him regularly and in full, while his friendly relations with Kalita allowed the Uzbek and his entourage to remain confident in their power.

Ivan Danilovich managed to take advantage of Moscow’s geographical advantages, making it not only a political but also a spiritual as well as an economic center. Kalita is deservedly considered one of the first rulers who began the reunification of fragmented Russia.

The “Russian land gatherer” 31 of March died either in 1340 or in 1341. The data on his death are confused, and today it is impossible to say what exactly caused his death. The sons of Kalita, who ascended the throne of Moscow, Simeon the Proud and Ivan Krasny, continued the policy of their father, which allowed the Moscow principality to acquire enormous political weight and finally gain a foothold in the role of the center of Russia.

A.Vasnetsov.Moscow Kremlin under Ivan Kalita
39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    31 March 2012 08: 47
    The main mistake .. or maybe a deliberate distortion ... is that the events and actions of that time are evaluated from the point of view of today's ethical standards ... but in those days everything was different ... for example, the first whip is a charming custom for a scammer, now replaced by administrative responsibility for defamation ... etc. plus ... a relatively unbiased presentation ...
    1. +2
      31 March 2012 12: 59
      I support. By the way, not only this article suffers from this cute "ailment".
      1. recitatorus
        +3
        31 March 2012 14: 02
        We all suffer from this ailment to one degree or another! .. Too much we like simple and beautiful stories ...
  2. Georg Shep
    0
    31 March 2012 10: 50
    Yes, despite the many negatives of the reign of Ivan Kalita, the main thing was achieved - the preservation and increase of Russian land and statehood.
  3. Charon
    +5
    31 March 2012 11: 05
    The logic of the prince's actions was in complete agreement with the mores of that time. And all the revelations are nothing more than a wave of his fists after a fight.
    Best of all, and the end result speaks for its benefit.
    But the expansion of the territory is one thing. The territory can be expanded with fire and sword, having received uninhabited lands. But if the population began to live better, richer and safer, this is called state wisdom. And spit on the moans of a few offended boyars.
    1. recitatorus
      +2
      31 March 2012 14: 06
      The main unity and strengthening of the country! But the boyars - this is the matter of ten. It was precisely on the foundation laid by Rus Kalita and was able to throw off the Mongol yoke!
  4. +3
    31 March 2012 11: 58
    Charon,
    I agree with you -Ivan Kalita was a worthy ruler !!!!! fellow
  5. -7
    31 March 2012 12: 02
    There is no specifics at all! The author describes the period of the reign or life of a certain person (ruler), while he has no idea when he was born and gave his soul to God, but describes how he originally and cunningly ascended the throne! And the phrase - "he went to the Horde or paid tribute to the Horde" especially makes one think. IS THIS WHERE TO BE? This is the first time I hear about Khan Uzbek! I will not list further. Today's morals may have changed in comparison with that time, but why does the author mislead the people with his ignorance of the topic ?! Just so it was or what ???
  6. cvet2010gordeeva
    +4
    31 March 2012 12: 44
    1. Ruler of the Golden Horde Uzbek Khan (1282-1341)
    2. Regarding the date of birth of Ivan Kalita, I confess I don’t know the date of birth, but neither Karamzin, nor Solovyov, nor other eminent researchers, nor even (I bow down before the wisdom of this source) Wikipedia knows it. But I don’t know for one simple reason: information is lost
    3. According to the date of death, the same story
    4. And about the fact that you do not know Khan Uzbek - I sympathize)))
    1. -4
      31 March 2012 15: 02
      Quote: cvet2010gordeeva
      The ruler of the Golden Horde Uzbek Khan (1282-1341gg.)

      What did you mean by that ??? What was such a person?
      Firstly, what was his name then, and where is he mentioned because Uzbek Khan is a title, not a proper name! But what did he do so outstandingly so that he would be paid a tribute and where is it said? Secondly speaking, the Golden Horde, suggests the idea that the horde is not alone and what is it in general, the state or something else? And where was this very horde to be so afraid of and pay tribute to?
      Quote: cvet2010gordeeva
      Regarding the birth date of Ivan Kalita, I repent I do not know the date of birth, but neither Karamzin, nor Solovyov, nor other eminent researchers know her, nor even (I prostrate myself before the wisdom of this source) Wikipedia. But I don’t know for one simple reason: information has been lost

      If the information had been lost, then no one would ever hear about Ivan Kalita or the known Khan of Uzbeks! I generally will not say anything about Wikipedia, because in my opinion there are some written moments that have nothing to do with the real state of things! And the most interesting, who writes it ???
      Quote: cvet2010gordeeva
      And about the fact that you do not know Khan Uzbek - I sympathize)))

      I sympathize with you because you have more questions than you have answers!
      1. 0
        31 March 2012 21: 27
        AND! Nosovsky and Fomenko Incorporated
        1. 0
          April 1 2012 05: 51
          rexby63
          I take these scientists calmly, and I do not put their conclusions at the forefront, and there are questions from me on them, so I don’t understand your pathos with writing their names!
          They would answer the questions posed by me, you can talk substantively, and there’s simply nothing to talk about!
      2. 0
        31 March 2012 22: 36
        At one time it was held in the 7 class ... and Tsar Peter 1 is the title ... minus ..
        1. +1
          April 1 2012 06: 01
          ward
          I am glad for you that you passed something in the 7th grade!
          The title is TSAR, proper name - PETER ALEKSEEVICH ROMANOV !!!
          Now tell me who is Uzbek Khan, am I all in attention ???
    2. 0
      19 August 2018 09: 27
      ... Yaroslav Vsevolodovich = Ivan Kalita, after the death of his elder brother from a wound received on the river Vozha - * self-destructive * with the neighbors of Yuri Dolgoruky became a full-fledged Master .. He concentrated in his hands spiritual authority (John Presbyter) and military ..
      Khan John Rurik Varangian Troyanets (grandson of Gostamysl) arrived in Russia at the beginning of the 12th century (somewhere in the year 1210-12) ..
      Rurik -droil- Vsevolod -
      Vsevolod -droil- Yuri Dolgoruky and Ivan Kalit .. (Ivan Kalif) ..
      ... and the Uzbek Khan just dreams of someone ..
  7. +1
    31 March 2012 12: 59
    ... cunning and betrayal. However, from this moment the raids on the territory did not repeat.

    http://topwar.ru/12958-ivan-kalita-politika-vne-morali.html


    No comments
  8. +1
    31 March 2012 15: 24
    So, for several decades, they did not burn villages and did not lead the damned Orthodox to full.
    According to this result, Ivan Kalita to the Prince of Moscow bow to the Earth.

    "Despite his apparent adherence to the canons of Orthodoxy, Kalita adhered to the principle of religious tolerance in resolving issues of recruitment. People with outstanding business qualities flocked to Moscow. Tatars, Orthodox Lithuanians, Russians flew to Moscow, fleeing the wrath of specific rulers. The pace of development of the principality turned out to be the same. of the highest in the history of Ancient Rus. "
    Another bow

    "In Moscow, criminal offenses were severely punished, so the level of security in the principality increased significantly. Kalita paid great attention to legislation in the field of civil circulation, especially inheritance."

    And the third bow !!!

  9. Strabo
    +2
    31 March 2012 18: 50
    How deeply historical falsification has penetrated us. I think those who so impudently lied from the Torah can be proud of themselves. they succeeded. Yes, there was no IGA. This was simply hammered into us, and this fact, sucked from the finger, hide all the horrors of the forcible baptism of Russia. Enough to believe in this nonsense that the grand dukes went to the Tatar-Iongols for "blessing".
    In vain minus Sibiryak he is just right. Well open your eyes, well read more. After all, even on the ancient frescoes of the Tatar-Mongols, all with Russian faces and light beards. That the Horde is a militia-army. Khan is a military commander. How many more generations will believe in this lie about Yoke?

    http://clck.yandex.ru/redir/AiuY0DBWFJ4ePaEse6rgeAjgs2pI3DW99KUdgowt9XtO8xHuNro5
    yZmnfAM-5RtYXpjSkoKP1r9B7ahS6Fz9Vl8dOV0kY8VSEYF_EEXvWPI63Dc6ScL7CESwehD1e-Ce-BiW
    zZxygj4zmMYdnq_NJ_PIsvLz9dEPStnN5iy9P54I9XswpNU7CQ?data=UlNrNmk5WktYejR0eWJFYk1L
    dmtxdVA3QjZrYy10ZFZ6U3BfN00xd3JFV2hKZU8weUZyTk5sR2kzT1RFV1pMN1gxVWV4UkNBQjFVUXdp
    bU1xaTNzQmhERHF5c0VNcnlYdjFvUXRfd0ZMeWI4dmlRRlhDekhuMWFMaEgtR25IOGFwYlp5ODFSdmlx
    WGxCMHhHaTl4eTFn&b64e=2&sign=1d25fe427c428f5aa67b5ad1f6711352&keyno=8&l10n=ru&mc
    = 3169 & i = 4 Here is a small link on this topic. There are indisputable facts that the yoke was not If anyone is interested.
    1. +1
      31 March 2012 22: 41
      I talked with the Tatar guys who are moving this version ... to the question about the evidence ... according to the logical calculations ... that is, they could not provide evidence ... the version of course is kind of beautiful and for the sake of the day ... but how they say sucked from a finger ...
    2. Arc76
      +1
      April 1 2012 11: 24
      In medieval European miniatures, the Arabs fighting the crusaders are also depicted as eropeoids, so frescoes are not an argument.
    3. Marat
      +2
      April 1 2012 18: 24
      My father studied in Kazan during the war and afterwards talked with historians from Kazan University - I know that in Tatarstan this idea is very popular (as well as in our country) it is possible that the "terrible yoke of the Mongols and Tatars" is greatly exaggerated - the Eurasian boiler was simply seething and processes were going on civil strife and unification - while Kalita played a great and most useful role (I'm not sure if he understood it himself)

      Although on the other hand we both have written and oral history, that the Mongols beat us hard once (including the Battle of Kalka - where the Russians were our allies) - since then there has been a history of refugees to Hungary or slaves sold to Egypt (Mamelukes) and seized power there

      I want to note the main thing - no matter how we interpret the story - we must not allow it to split us - take the example from the Kazakhs - none of us hold an evil on the Mongol for the defeat that took place more than 700 years ago
      On the contrary - we have Mongolian clans (for example, Genghisides - tore)

      Kazakhs do not have any hostility in the Mongols - only sympathy as to a people related by customs and common history

      The Russians should also apply to the Mongols - a common history has made you relatives. Mongolia is the 16th republic and should become a part of our new Eurasian Union. But the Tatars in general, its core and foundation is the same as the Russian people
  10. Strabo
    +2
    31 March 2012 20: 38
    For those who know a little history. It has long been no secret that there was no “Tatar-Mongol yoke”, and no Tatars with the Mongols conquered Russia. But who and why falsified history? What was hidden behind the Tatar-Mongol yoke?
    There are a large number of facts that not only unequivocally disprove the hypothesis of the Tatar-Mongol yoke, but also say that the story was deliberately distorted, and that this was done with a very definite purpose ... And minus DUZZES or those who like this nation-degrading lie .
    1. -1
      31 March 2012 21: 35
      Yes, I minus you and I'm not afraid to say so. Because I trust SM Solovyov more. , Klyuchevsky V.O. Shakhmatov AA, Rybakov BA, Gumilev LN, than two well-known "academicians". By the way, are the above scientists also stupid? Yes, buddy, pride is a terrible sin
      1. 0
        31 March 2012 22: 08
        Academician, in the pair that you call - Fomenko Anatoly Timofeevich. Moreover, the academician - without quotes. Are you a specialist in the topology of mathematical sets? But A.T. Fomenko - yes.
        So .... would be pseudoscience - a new chronology ... would not be printed in Berlin. In London. In the States.
        1. 0
          April 1 2012 11: 11
          In the topology of mathematical sets


          I know about it. And I read Nosovsky with Fomenko. But the interest among Western publishers in the works of Nosovsky and Fomenko causes some surprise. They do not feel such sympathy for their new Chronoloists. The question is - how many times in almost three hundred years have I. Newton republished "The Corrected Chronology of Ancient Kingdoms" and in what circulation? And I. Newton has more merits than your idols
        2. 0
          24 August 2018 08: 12
          .... for the very gifted Mongolia was founded in 1920. Will you eat the earth? ..
      2. Strabo
        +3
        31 March 2012 22: 31
        Yes, I’m not afraid of your cons to write off the destruction of 300/2 of the population and a third of cities during the Christianization of Ancient Russia (Pater Dius wrote about this reasonably in the article “Orthodox Russia before the adoption of Christianity and after” and Leo Prozorov in the book “Pagans of Baptized Rus”). But the Rybakovs and Gumilevs you listed, and others, well, they couldn’t write differently; There was a time like that. For you, I specifically cite the fact that the whole history of Russia was written by the Germans, and later others faithfully copied. Well, we are honored by the fact that I was minded by scientists, I doubt very much. Here you and 3 classes do not smell.
        1. +1
          April 1 2012 11: 15
          Besides Gumilyov and Rybakov, have I ever named anyone else? And Gumilyov’s bias is hard to suspect; he wasn’t particularly published in Soviet times. And your gurus, as they felt the weakness of power, and set off in all serious ways. Historians, Ha!
      3. +1
        April 1 2012 05: 33
        Quote: rexby63
        Because I trust SM Solovyov more. , Klyuchevsky V.O. Shakhmatov AA, Rybakov BA, Gumilev LN, than two well-known "academicians".

        Two not unknown academicians just take into account the opinion of Solovyov, Gumilyov, etc., so there is still a big question, what do you believe in when you come to such conclusions !!!
        1. +1
          April 1 2012 12: 58
          Well, from this place in more detail, how and where they take into account the opinion of Solovyov and Gumilyov.
          1. serge
            +2
            April 1 2012 14: 08
            There are sources more authoritative than Rybakov and Shakhmatov. Novgorod, Suzdal, Ustyug and many other annals. The tale of the battle on the Kalka River, The tale of Batu’s arrival in Ryazan, The tale of the ruin of Kiev ... Yan Dlugosh, Matvey Mehovskiy, Plano Karpini, Juweini, The Secret Tale of the Mongols (Yuan-chao bi-shi), Rashid-ad-Din, Byzantine sources ...
            1. +1
              April 1 2012 17: 45
              I agree, only you should address this commentary to fans of the "new chronology"
      4. equal
        +1
        April 1 2012 20: 54
        Unfortunately, scientists are also people and write to order, and also use each other's materials without verification. Under Peter, the Germans rewrote history
        Russian Empire. In ten years, we, that is, our grandchildren, will consider that the United States won the Great Patriotic War. Because this is what the "new" scribes of history want. About other countries and there is no talk, absolutely different stories and geography are taught in schools.
    2. 0
      7 July 2018 11: 47
      ..project of Ulyanov = Lenin = Blanca with burry comrades ..
  11. +4
    31 March 2012 21: 56
    Dental, amazing, fearsome ...

    Break spears why? ....

    Lovely girl Elena Gordeeva, cvet2010gordeeva (I hope she will forgive me for such liberties) - outlined the story of Ivan Kalita in a good language and is accessible, as TRADITIONAL history interprets it.

    There are people who are closer, more experienced, more reliable NEW chronology.

    Well, of course, there will be no common ground. Or very few.

    What is the argument about? I don’t understand.
    It’s good that Ivan Kalita turned out to be not an ancient ukr.
    God’s - to God, Caesar’s - to Caesar.
    So far, the new chronology has not been accepted as the main and approved for teaching ... will have to do .. traditional.
  12. +1
    31 March 2012 22: 47
    Helen, forgive Christ for our wretched sake ... we don’t understand what we are doing ... if your child spends too much time on the military review site .. try to accustom him to healthier activities ... wine, women and cards ...
    1. +2
      April 1 2012 13: 36
      blame, women and cards ..


      This is when young and everything is possible, then of course. Did I thirty years ago start arguing about some new theory there
  13. dmb
    +1
    April 2 2012 13: 54
    "Some say that there is God. Others, that there is no God. Both are unprovable" And the article is not bad and without any special blunders. As for the question of the Iga, I like the approach of A. Bushkov. As a science fiction writer, he is not interesting to me, but his historical studies (for all their controversy) make me think and read different sources. Most worrisome is the fact that they are trying to deprive our people of a past of which they are proud. For me personally, the Battle on the Ice and the Battle of Kulikovo will not be minor skirmishes between neighboring feudal lords. but the great history of my homeland. And it was thanks to them that I was proud of my country during the Soviet years. Those who disagree may point to the "Great Battles" of other nations thanks to which humanity has become better. And for those who appeal to humanism, I recommend reading the "Old Testament". They learn a lot of useful things about oppressed Jews in particular.
  14. +1
    11 June 2018 08: 46
    ... Ivan Kalita = Khan Batuy = Yaroslav Vsevolodovich - the grandson of Khan Eney Rurik Varyag the Trojan called up for RULE .. did not need the blessing of any khans of the Uzbeks .. For his father Vsevolod was the ruler ...
  15. 0
    7 July 2018 11: 38
    Quote: Strabo
    Yes, I’m not afraid of your cons to write off the destruction of 300/2 of the population and a third of cities during the Christianization of Ancient Russia (Pater Dius wrote about this reasonably in the article “Orthodox Russia before the adoption of Christianity and after” and Leo Prozorov in the book “Pagans of Baptized Rus”). But the Rybakovs and Gumilevs you listed, and others, well, they couldn’t write differently; There was a time like that. For you, I specifically cite the fact that the whole history of Russia was written by the Germans, and later others faithfully copied. Well, we are honored by the fact that I was minded by scientists, I doubt very much. Here you and 3 classes do not smell.

    .. to help - Mongolia was founded in the year 192nd, respectively, the nation and nationality .. And no one could write about the Mongols before 1920 .., but replacing the concepts of Mogols, the great ones with the Mongols is easy and simple .. This was done by the elect of God Ulyanova = Blanca ..
    Also in 1920 they * re-christened * the Volga Bulgars to the Tatars .. And they received the Tatar-Mongol invasion .. The Jews have a lot of minds about the muck ..
  16. 0
    7 July 2018 11: 43
    Quote: Strabo
    Yes, I’m not afraid of your cons to write off the destruction of 300/2 of the population and a third of cities during the Christianization of Ancient Russia (Pater Dius wrote about this reasonably in the article “Orthodox Russia before the adoption of Christianity and after” and Leo Prozorov in the book “Pagans of Baptized Rus”). But the Rybakovs and Gumilevs you listed, and others, well, they couldn’t write differently; There was a time like that. For you, I specifically cite the fact that the whole history of Russia was written by the Germans, and later others faithfully copied. Well, we are honored by the fact that I was minded by scientists, I doubt very much. Here you and 3 classes do not smell.

    ... by the way, Yaroslav is not Danilovich .. Yaroslav - Vsevolodovich .. Vsevolod is the son of Rurik Ioann the Varangian of the Trojan ...